Abstract
The ATP-sensitive P2X2 ionotropic receptor plays a critical role in a number of signal processes including taste and hearing, carotid body detection of hypoxia, the exercise pressor reflex and sensory transduction of mechanical stimuli in the airways and bladder. Elucidation of the role of P2X2 has been hindered by the lack of selective tools. In particular, detection of P2X2 using established pharmacological and biochemical techniques yields dramatically different expression patterns, particularly in the peripheral and central nervous systems. Here, we have developed a knock-in P2X2-cre mouse, which we crossed with a cre-sensitive tdTomato reporter mouse to determine P2X2 expression. P2X2 was found in more than 80% of nodose vagal afferent neurons, but not in jugular vagal afferent neurons. Reporter expression correlated in vagal neurons with sensitivity to α,β methylene ATP (αβmATP). P2X2 was expressed in 75% of petrosal afferents, but only 12% and 4% of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and trigeminal afferents, respectively. P2X2 expression was limited to very few cell types systemically. Together with the central terminals of P2X2-expressing afferents, reporter expression in the CNS was mainly found in brainstem neurons projecting mossy fibers to the cerebellum, with little expression in the hippocampus or cortex. The structure of peripheral terminals of P2X2-expressing afferents was demonstrated in the tongue (taste buds), carotid body, trachea and esophagus. P2X2 was observed in hair cells and support cells in the cochlear, but not in spiral afferent neurons. This mouse strain provides a novel approach to the identification and manipulation of P2X2-expressing cell types.
Significance Statement
Inhibitor and knock-out studies have demonstrated the critical role of P2X2 in multiple sensory signaling pathways. Nevertheless, P2X2 expression patterns are controversial, as biochemical studies suggest widespread expression, whereas functional studies suggest restricted expression. Functional characterization is further complicated by heteromeric P2X2/3 channels that have hybrid pharmacology and biophysical properties. We have developed a P2X2-cre mouse to determine the expression pattern of P2X2. In the periphery, P2X2 expression is found in almost all nodose sensory afferents but is limited to only minor subsets of trigeminal and DRG afferents. Centrally, P2X2 is mostly expressed in neurons projecting mossy fibers to the cerebellum. Thus, we provide novel evidence for the specific expression of P2X2, which is more limited than previously thought.
Introduction
P2X2 is one of seven members of the P2X purinergic receptor family (Brake et al., 1994; Dunn et al., 2001; Khakh et al., 2001). P2X2 is a cation-permeable plasma membrane ion channel activated by extracellular ATP, which can form either functional homomeric channels or functional heteromeric channels with P2X3 (Brake et al., 1994; Chen et al., 1995; Lewis et al., 1995). Based on pharmacological and genetic knock-out studies, P2X2 plays important roles in a number of peripheral organs, including taste cell signaling to gustatory sensory afferents (Finger et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2011), hypoxic signaling in carotid bodies (Rong et al., 2003), protection from noise-induced ototoxicity (Yan et al., 2013), the exercise pressor reflex (McCord et al., 2010), and mechanical transduction in sensory afferents innervating the airways (Weigand et al., 2012) and bladder (Cockayne et al., 2005). Nevertheless, the precise role of P2X2 in peripheral afferents and in other systems is hindered by the lack of selective tools.
P2X2 and P2X3 homomeric channels can be discriminated by the desensitization of their ATP-evoked currents (limited desensitization/persistent currents for P2X2 channels, rapid desensitization for P2X3) and their sensitivity to α,β methylene ATP (αβmATP; P2X3 is activated by this ATP analog, whereas P2X2 is not; Dunn et al., 2001; Khakh et al., 2001). Nevertheless, co-expression of P2X2 and P2X3 causes the formation of heteromeric P2X2/3 channels that evoke mixed/persistent currents in response to both ATP and αβmATP (Lewis et al., 1995). Furthermore, the kinetics of P2X channel desensitization are modulated by numerous factors (Bianchi et al., 1999; Sokolova et al., 2006), thus decreasing its effectiveness as a diagnostic for discriminating P2X2, P2X3, and P2X2/3 channels. Biochemical detection of P2X2 reveals similar inconsistencies: immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization has revealed robust and widespread expression of P2X2 in peripheral and central neurons and smooth muscle (Brake et al., 1994; Kidd et al., 1995; Collo et al., 1996; Vulchanova et al., 1996; Kanjhan et al., 1999; Petruska et al., 2000b; Yao et al., 2000, 2003; Gourine et al., 2003; Spehr et al., 2004; Ambalavanar et al., 2005; Cockayne et al., 2005; Simonetti et al., 2006; Staikopoulos et al., 2007; Song et al., 2012), although functional studies of ATP- and αβmATP-evoked currents suggest a much more limited expression pattern. As such there is considerable uncertainty regarding the expression of P2X2, despite its established role in cellular signaling, particularly in the peripheral nervous system (Rong et al., 2003; Cockayne et al., 2005; Finger et al., 2005; McCord et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2011; Weigand et al., 2012).
Here, we used genetic targeting of the endogenous P2X2 locus to generate a knock-in reporter mouse that expresses Cre recombinase in P2X2-expressing cells. After crossing this strain with a cre-sensitive tdTomato reporter mouse strain, we visualized P2X2 expression in sensory ganglia, the CNS and in peripheral tissues. We found robust reporter expression in nodose vagal neurons but not in jugular vagal neurons, and reporter expression was limited to few neurons in the trigeminal ganglia and dorsal root ganglia (DRG). We confirmed the expression of P2X2 in tdTomato-expressing vagal neurons by assessing Ca2+ influx in response to the P2X2/3 agonist αβmATP using fura-2 AM. Reporter expression was used to visualize P2X2-expressing terminals in the tongue, carotid body, trachea and esophagus as well as in the nucleus tractus solitarius (nTS) in the dorsal medulla (the location of central terminations of nodose sensory afferents). Elsewhere in the CNS, reporter expression was largely limited to medullary and pontine neurons protecting mossy fibers to the cerebellum, although reporter expression was also noted in a small number of cerebellar Purkinje neurons, cerebral cortical neurons and caudoputamen neurons. Lastly, we observed expression in hair cells and support cells in the organ of Corti in the cochlea. Thus, this reporter mouse demonstrates the specific expression of the purinergic receptor P2X2 and provides a novel tool to study the structure and function of these particular cells.
Materials and Methods
Knock-in mouse model development
The gene for the murine P2X2 receptor (P2rx2 gene, NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_153400.4) is located on chromosome 5. Eleven exons have been identified, with the ATG start codon in exon 1 and TGA stop codon in exon 11. In order to develop a knock-in mouse that expresses Cre recombinase dependent on P2X2 expression, the P2X2 TGA stop codon was replaced with a 2A-Cre cassette (Fig. 1). The targeting vector homology arms were generated by high fidelity Taq PCR using BAC clone RP23-333M22 and RP23-354O18 from the C57BL/6J library as template. The targeting vector was assembled with recombination sites and selection markers: neomycin resistance gene (NeoR) flanked by self-deletion anchor (SDA) sites for positive selection and diphtheria toxin A fragment gene (DTA) for negative selection. Correct targeting vector synthesis was confirmed by appropriate digestion by restriction enzymes. The linearized vector was subsequently delivered to C57BL/6 ES cells via electroporation, followed by drug selection, PCR screening, and Southern blotting confirmation. After gaining 94 neomycin-resistant clones, 18 potentially targeted clones were confirmed, five of which were expanded for Southern blotting. After confirming correctly targeted ES clones via Southern blotting, clones were selected for blastocyst microinjection, followed by founder production. Founders were confirmed as germline-transmitted via crossbreeding with wild type. All aspects of knock-in mouse development were performed by Cyagen US Inc (California). Founders were mated to produce heterozygous and homozygous mice (P2rx2tm1.1(cre)Ttc , MGI:2665170) in expected Mendelian proportions. These mice express P2X2-2A-Cre from the endogenous P2X2 gene. Upon translation, the 2A peptide self-cleaves (Furler et al., 2001) to release P2X2 and Cre as separate peptides. P2rx2tm1.1(cre)Ttc mice develop normally and were observed to have no apparent phenotype. Homozygous P2rx2tm1.1(cre)Ttc were crossed with the ROSA26-loxP-STOP-loxP-tdTomato mice (B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J, #007909, The Jackson Laboratory) to produce P2X2 Cre/+/ROSA26-tdTomatofl/+ (P2X2-tdTomato mice), with cell-specific expression of tdTomato via Cre recombination. Specific alleles were confirmed by genotyping per developers’ instructions. Both male and female mice (six to eight weeks old) were used for experiments. Offspring were weaned at 21 postnatal days and up to four littermates were housed per cage under normal condition (20°C, a 12/12 h light/dark cycle). Mice were provided with standard rodent chow and water ad libitum. All procedures were in accordance with the animal protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Development of the knock-in P2X2 Cre mouse. A, Targeting strategy for the replacement of the P2X2 TGA stop codon with a 2A-Cre cassette (2A self-cleaving peptide in purple, Cre in dark gray). Homology arms (blue and red lines) were generated for the P2X2 gene [exons, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) in orange] and the latter portion of the neighboring Pole gene (exons, and 3′ UTR in green). Homology arms of targeting vector include a neomycin resistance gene (NeoR) flanked by SDA sites for positive selection. A Diphtheria toxin A fragment gene (DTA) was placed in a non-homologous region of targeting vector as a negative selection for non-homologous recombination. B, PCR of P2X2 gene in offspring from a pairing of heterozygous P2X2 Cre mice. As expected, offspring have a mendelian distribution of mutant (i.e., P2X2 Cre, at 394 bp) and wild-type (at 319 bp) alleles.
Tissue collection and immunofluorescence
Mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation and transcardially perfused with ice-cold PBS followed by perfusion fixation with ice-cold 3.7% formaldehyde (FA). Vagal ganglia, petrosal ganglia, trigeminal ganglia, thoracic DRG (T1-T5), and carotid body were dissected out and postfixed for 1 h in 3.7% FA at 4°C. Medulla, spinal cord, and tongue were collected and postfixed for 4 h in 3.7% FA at 4°C. Brains were collected and postfixed overnight in 3.7% FA at 4°C. For the cochlea, the temporal bones were collected and postfixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. The temporal bones were washed three times in PBS for 10 min and transferred to 10% EDTA (dissolved in H2O, pH 7.2) solution for overnight decalcification at 4°C. Tissue firmness was checked by pressing tissue with forceps to ensure adequate decalcification.
All tissues were washed in PBS to remove residual FA and transferred to 20% sucrose solution for cryoprotection. Tissue were mounted in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound and snap frozen in dry-ice before cryosectioning: sensory ganglia (20 μm), carotid bodies (20 μm), tongue (40 μm), cochlea (40 μm), spinal cord (20 μm), medulla (40 μm for coronal, 80 μm for sagittal), and brain (80 μm). All slices were collected onto Superfroast plus slides. Slides were then air-dried at room temperature in the dark overnight. For immunofluorescence, sectioned tissue was permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS (PBSTx) for 15 min followed by blocking with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/10% donkey serum (DS)/0.3% PBSTx. Sectioned tissue was incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C. Sensory ganglia slices were stained for immunoreactivity to TRPV1 (goat, 1:150, sc-12 498, Santa Cruz), the neurotrophin receptors tyrosine receptor kinase A (TRKA; rabbit, 1:300, 06-574, Millipore) or pgp9.5 (rabbit, 1:300, AB5925, Millipore). Carotid body slices were immunostained against tyrosine hydroxylase (TH; rabbit, 1:300, AB112, Abcam). Sequentially sectioned medulla slices were stained against TRPV1 (guinea pig, 1:150, GP14100, Neuromics). After washing with 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS (PBST) three times for 10 min, tissue was incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies [chicken anti-goat 647 (1:300, A212345, Invitrogen), donkey anti-rabbit 488 (1:300, A21206, Invitrogen), and donkey anti-guinea pig 647 (1:300, AP193SA6, Millipore)] in 1% BSA/5% DS in 0.2% PBST for 1 h. Tissue was washed with 0.2% PBST three times for 10 min and rinsed briefly with H2O. In some cases, sectioned tissue was counterstained with either green or blue fluorescent Nissl staining (1:600, NeuroTrace 500/525 or 435/455, Fluorescent Nissl Stain, Invitrogen). Slides were air dried and mounted with DPX mounting medium (Sigma) or mounted with VECTASHIELD Antifade Medium with DAPI (Vector laboratories).
Wholemount immunostaining of trachea and esophagus
The mouse trachea was split lengthwise by making a single cut through the midline. The esophagus was cut around the stomach and then split lengthwise. The mucosal and muscle layers of the esophagus were separated carefully by small sharp dissection scissors. We stained the trachea by first permeabilizing with 1% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich) in filtered 1× PBS for 6 h at room temperature, then washed three times for 20 min in filtered 1× PBS using rotator. Permeabilized tracheal tissues were incubated with rabbit anti-RFP primary antibody (1:200, 600-401-379, Rockland antibodies) in PBS with 1% BSA for 48 h at 4°C (repositioned five to six times during incubation), washed in filtered 1× PBS ten times using rotator at 4°C, incubated with secondary antibody goat-anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen) with dilution 1:100 in filtered 1× PBS for 5 h at room temperature. Trachea were then washed in filtered 1× PBS (three times, rotator, 4°C), incubated in anti-fade glycerol (pH 8.6, 10× Tris-buffered saline mixed with glycerol) for 24 h at room temperature and stored in anti-fade glycerol at 4°C. The esophageal tissues went through the same treatment as the trachea, but the main difference was that we amplified the tdTomato signal by using a streptavidin-biotin protocol. In short, after the primary antibody step, the tissues were washed in 1× PBS and then incubated with goat biotin‐XX conjugate anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (1:100, B2770, Invitrogen) in 1% PBS/BSA overnight at room temperature (repositioned one to two times during incubation), washed in filtered 1× PBS 10 times using rotator at 4°C, and incubated with streptavidin conjugated with fluorescent dye Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen) with dilution 1:100 in filtered 1× PBS for 5 h at room temperature. All stained tissues were then positioned muscular or mucosal side up on a glass slide and covered with coverslip 24 × 50 mm. In the first stained preparation, we found numerous randomly distributed oval solid artifacts. Optimization of staining procedure revealed that these artifacts attributable to the use of 1% goat blocking serum. In control experiments, omitting goat serum eliminated these artifacts, while including goat serum reproduced them. Therefore, in all subsequent staining, goat serum was omitted.
Visualization of reporter expression in sectioned and wholemount tissue
Images were taken with either Olympus FV1200 laser scanning confocal microscope or Andor Dragonfly spinning disk confocal microscope using Fusion software, and projection images were processed with Imaris software. In all cases the identification of anatomic structures and subnuclei were based on the mouse brain map (Paxinos and Franklin, 2012). Z stack images (10× and 20×) of the mouse esophagus and trachea (wholemount) were taken using Andor Dragonfly spinning disk microscope. Nerve terminals in the epithelial and subepithelial layers of the trachea were traced using Neurolucida 360 software (MBF Biosciences), as previously described (Dickstein et al., 2016): the 20× images were spaced at 0.6 μm. First, automatic nerve terminal detection (Rayburst crawl) was used, seeds were validated, then manual tracing was used to complete the tracing.
Vagal ganglia dissociation
Male 6- to 12-week-old P2X2-tdTomato mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation followed by exsanguination. As previously described (Stanford and Taylor-Clark, 2018), vagal ganglia were isolated in Ca2+-free, Mg2+-free HBSS, then incubated in HBSS containing collagenase (2 mg/ml) and dispase (2 mg/ml), then mechanically dissociated with fire-polished pipettes. Individual neurons were washed with L-15 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, then plated onto poly-D-lysine and laminin-coated coverslips. Neurons were incubated at 37°C in antibiotic-free L-15 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and used within 24 h.
Live neuron Ca2+ imaging and analysis
Neurons were incubated with 4 μm fura-2 AM for 30–60 min at 37°C. Coverslips were loaded into a chamber on an inverted microscope and perfused with heated (33–34°C) HEPES buffer (154 mm NaCl, 1.2 mm KCl, 1.2 mm MgCl2, 2.5 mm CaCl2, and 5.6 mm D-glucose). Slides equilibrated for 10 min before the start of the experiment and an image was taken to visualize tdTomato fluorescence (535-nm excitation, 610-nm emission). Changes in [Ca2+]i was monitored using sequential excitation at 340 and 380 nm (510-nm emission) with images taken every 6 s using a CoolSnap HQ2 camera (Photometrics) and evaluated ratiometrically using the 340/380 ratio. All drugs were diluted in HEPES buffer. αβmATP (10 μm) was used to determine the functional expression of P2X2/3 channels (Taylor-Clark et al., 2015). The EC50 for αβmATP-evoked activation of P2X2/3 channels is ∼3–9 μm (Khakh et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2001). Capsaicin (1 μm) was used to determine the functional expression of the nociceptive ion channel TRPV1 (Taylor-Clark et al., 2015). Neurons were further characterized by response to KCl (75 mm) before ionomycin (5 μM), which evoked a maximal Ca2+ response. Image analysis was performed by using Nikon Elements (Nikon) by drawing individual regions of interest (ROIs) that around the intracellular region for each cell and tracked over time. ROIs with an unstable, high, or noisy baseline were eliminated from analysis. Neurons which failed to exhibit an increase in [Ca2+]i to either αβmATP, capsaicin or KCl challenges (>30% the ionomycin maximal response) were eliminated. Relative changes in [Ca2+]i were determined ratiometrically using fura-2 fluorescence: 340/380 ratio (R). This negates the impact of cell to cell variations in fura-2 AM loading. Data are presented as changes in the 340/380 ratio (ΔR = R1 – R0), where R0 is the average 340/380 ratio before mATP treatment. As before (Stanford and Taylor-Clark, 2018; Stanford et al., 2019), an individual neuron was considered to be sensitive to a given agent if Ragent > (Rbl + 2*SDbl) + 0.075, where Ragent is the average 340/380 ratio during treatment, Rbl is the average 340/380 ratio before treatment, and SDbl is the SD of Rbl. Neurons were grouped by tdTomato expression and sensitivity to αβmATP and capsaicin. Data and statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism 7. Mean Ca2+ responses were compared using Student’s t test; p = 0.05 was taken as the threshold for significance.
Results
To investigate the expression of P2X2, we generated a knock-in P2X2 Cre mouse (Fig. 1), which was crossed with the cre-sensitive ROSA26-loxP-STOP-loxP-tdTomato reporter mouse. The resultant P2X2-tdTomato mice express the red fluorescent tdTomato in P2X2-expressing cells.
Cryostat sections of the vagal ganglia from four P2X2-tdTomato mice showed robust and selective expression of tdTomato in nodose vagal sensory neurons, whereas there was little tdTomato expression in jugular vagal sensory neurons (1045 vs 16 tdTomato+ neurons, respectively; Fig. 2A). Vagal ganglia from two of these P2X2-tdTomato mice were assessed for NeuroTrace (Nissl) staining (data not shown) to calculate the percentage of neurons that expressed tdTomato. More than 80% of nodose neurons were tdTomato+, compared with just 2% of jugular neurons (Fig. 3A). This is consistent with data from vagal ganglia from P2X2-tdTomato stained for the neuronal marker pgp9.5, which again showed that few nodose neurons failed to express tdTomato (Fig. 2B). tdTomato expression in nodose neurons was noted in >75% of both TRPV1+ and TRPV1– populations (Figs. 2A-D, 3B). Very few tdTomato+ neurons also expressed TRKA, which was widely expressed in jugular neurons (Fig. 2C,D). We then investigated tdTomato expression in the trigeminal and thoracic DRG of P2X2-tdTomato mice. In sections counterstained with NeuroTrace, we found only 3.6% of trigeminal neurons were tdTomato+, and these were equally distributed between the maxillary/ophthalmic and mandibular regions (Figs. 2E,F, 3A). The rare tdTomato+ trigeminal neurons were mostly TRPV1+ (Figs. 2E,F, 3B). Few DRG neurons (12.3%) expressed tdTomato (Figs. 2G, 3A), although these were equally split between TRPV1+ and TRPV1– populations (Figs. 2G, 3B). Lastly, we found extensive tdTomato expression within the petrosal ganglia, with 75% of petrosal neurons from four ganglia expressing the marker (Fig. 2H).
tdTomato expression in P2X2-tdTomato mice is restricted to subsets of sensory afferents. A–C, tdTomato (red) expression in vagal ganglia, with the demarcation of the nodose and jugular regions delineated by dotted line. A, Counterstained for TRPV1 (green) expression. B, Counterstained for TRPV1 (blue) and pgp9.5 (green) expression. C, Counterstained for TRPV1 (blue) and TRKA (green) expression. D, tdTomato (red) expression in nodose neurons identified in C. Left, Counterstained for TRPV1 (green) expression. Middle, Counterstained for TRKA (green) expression. Right, Counterstained for TRPV1 (blue) and TRKA (green) expression. E–G, tdTomato (red) expression counterstained for TRPV1 expression (blue) and with NeuroTrace (green). E, Maxillary/ophthalmic region of the trigeminal ganglia. tdTomato+ neurons identified by white arrows. F, Mandibular region of the trigeminal ganglia. G, DRG. H, Petrosal ganglia, counterstained with NeuroTrace (green). Scale bars: 100 μm (A–C, E), 50 μm (D, F, G), and 20 μm (H). Data are derived from five vagal ganglia, five trigeminal ganglia, four DRG, and four petrosal ganglia.
Quantification of tdTomato and TRPV1 expression in vagal, trigeminal, and DRG afferents. A, The % of neurotrace+ neurons that express tdTomato and TRPV1. B, The % of TRPV1+ neurons and TRPV1– neurons that also express tdTomato. Data are derived from two vagal ganglia, five trigeminal ganglia, and three thoracic DRG.
To link tdTomato expression to P2X2 expression in the P2X2-tdTomato mouse, we investigated the sensitivity of vagal sensory neurons to the P2X2/3 agonist αβmATP. Previous studies indicate that virtually all nodose and jugular neurons express P2X3, but P2X2 is only expressed in nodose neurons (Cockayne et al., 2005; Kwong et al., 2008; Nassenstein et al., 2010; Surdenikova et al., 2012; Trancikova et al., 2018). αβmATP only causes significant vagal neuron activation in neurons that express both P2X2 and P2X3 (Lewis et al., 1995; Dunn et al., 2001; Khakh et al., 2001). Here, we assessed Ca2+ fluxes in dissociated P2X2-tdTomato vagal neurons in response to αβmATP (10 μm) and the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin (1 μm) in 478 tdTomato+ and 200 tdTomato– neurons (Fig. 4). The mean response to αβmATP was significantly greater in tdTomato+ neurons compared with tdTomato– neurons (0.29 ± 0.01 vs 0.06 ± 0.01, p < 0.05). Out of the 478 tdTomato+ neurons, 399 neurons responded to αβmATP (83.4%; Fig. 4C). Only 39 of the 200 tdTomato– neurons (19.5%) responded to αβmATP (Fig. 4C). The mean αβmATP response of αβmATP-sensitive neurons was greater in tdTomato+ neurons than tdTomato– neurons (0.35 ± 0.01 vs 0.22 ± 0.04, p < 0.05). There was no difference in mean capsaicin response between tdTomato+ and tdTomato– neurons (0.35 ± 0.02 vs 0.39 ± 0.04, p > 0.05). However, there were more capsaicin-sensitive neurons in the tdTomato+ population (261 out of 478, 54.6%) than in the tdTomato– population (72 out of 200, 36.0%). As such, the mean capsaicin response in capsaicin-sensitive neurons was significantly smaller in tdTomato+ neurons compared with tdTomato– neurons (0.66 ± 0.03 vs 1.08 ± 0.09, p < 0.05). Overall, the data indicate that tdTomato expression in vagal neurons of P2X2-tdTomato mice is a selective marker of αβmATP sensitivity.
Responsivity to αβmATP correlates with reporter expression in vagal neurons from P2X2-tdTomato mice. A, Brightfield image of dissociated vagal neurons overlaid with tdTomato (red) expression. Scale bar: 40 μm. B, Mean ± SEM [Ca2+]i responses of tdTomato+ (red, n = 478) and tdTomato– (black, n = 200) vagal neurons to αβmATP (10 μm), capsaicin (Caps, 1 μm), and KCl (75 mm). C, Euler diagram denoting the number of vagal neurons in each specific subset as determined by tdTomato expression and responsivity to αβmATP and capsaicin.
Sensory neurons in the vagal, petrosal and geniculate ganglia project central terminals via the tractus solitarius into the nTS in the brainstem medulla. In sections of the medulla of P2X2-tdTomato mice, we found robust tdTomato expression in fibers within the tractus solitarius and the nTS, in particular in medial and dorsal subnuclei such as the commissural subnucleus (SolC), gelatinous subnucleus (SolG), dorsal lateral subnucleus (SolDL), medial subnucleus (SolM), intermediate subnucleus (SolIM), and central subnucleus (SolCe; Fig. 5A,B). We also found some tdTomato+ fibers innervating the ventral subnucleus (SolV) and ventrolateral subnucleus (SolVL) and in the area postrema (Fig. 5B). These data are consistent with previous reports that nodose afferents innervate these medulla subnuclei (Kim et al., 2020). Previous studies have also shown that the central projections of TRPV1+ vagal afferents terminate mainly in the medial and dorsal nTS subnuclei and the area postrema (Kim et al., 2020). Here, we found substantial overlap of TRPV1 immunoreactivity and tdTomato within these areas, but the tdTomato+ fibers in lateral and ventral subnuclei did not express TRPV1, thus indicating that P2X2+TRPV1+ and P2X2+TRPV1– fibers have distinct central terminations (Fig. 5C), consistent with electrophysiological recordings of C- and A-fibers (Kubin et al., 1991, 2006). Serial sections indicated that tdTomato+ fibers were found along the entire rostral-caudal axis of the nTS (Fig. 5D). There was little tdTomato expression in the medulla other than within the tractus solitarius/nTS/area postrema. In particular, there were only a few sparse tdTomato+ terminations within the spinal trigeminal nucleus and the paratrigeminal complex, consistent with rare tdTomato expression in trigeminal afferent neurons. We did note tdTomato expression in minor subsets of neurons within the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus and the external cuneate (Fig. 5B,D). Lastly, we found tdTomato+ neurons within the lateral reticular nucleus (Fig. 5D-G), which project mossy fibers to the cerebellum. Only a few tdTomato+ neurons were found in the neighboring caudal ventrolateral medulla (Fig. 5D-G). Almost none of the neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla expressed tdTomato (Fig. 5D). In the thoracic spinal cord, we observed some tdTomato+ fibers within the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn (Fig. 6), consistent with expression of tdTomato in a minor subset of DRG afferents. There was little tdTomato expression in other spinal areas.
tdTomato expression in the medulla of P2X2-tdTomato mice. A, B, tdTomato (red) expression in the dorsal medulla counterstained with NeuroTrace (green). A, Sagittal section at midline. B, Coronal section at −300 μm (relative to obex). C, tdTomato (red) expression counterstained for TRPV1 (green) expression in coronal section at −390 μm (relative to obex). D, tdTomato expression in serial coronal sections from rostral to caudal, with labeling for the position relative to obex. The intensity of native tdTomato expression is shown in rainbow pseudocolor. E–G, tdTomato (red) expression in the ventrolateral medulla counterstained with NeuroTrace (green). E, Coronal section at −540 μm (relative to obex). F, higher magnification of inset in E. G, Sagittal section at 1.08 mm lateral to midline. The following structures are identified: area postrema (AP), central canal (CC), external cuneate nucleus (ECu), dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMX), hypoglossal motor nucleus (12N), lateral reticular nucleus (LRt), nucleus tractus solitarius (nTS), SolC (C), SolCe (Ce), SolDL (DL), SolG (G), SolIM (IM), SolM (M), SolV (V), SolVL (VL), and tractus solitarius (TS). Scale bars: 50 μm (A), 300 μm (B, C), and 500 μm (D).
tdTomato expression in the thoracic spinal cord of P2X2-tdTomato mice. A, B, Coronal sections with tdTomato expression (red), with (A) and without (B) counterstain by NeuroTrace (green). C, Higher magnification of superficial dorsal horn laminae. Scale bars:100 μm (A, B) and 50 μm (C).
We extended our investigation of tdTomato expression to the entire brain of P2X2-tdTomato mice (Fig. 7). As expected, we again found tdTomato expression in the nTS and the lateral reticular nucleus. Interestingly, we also found tdTomato expression in a subset of neurons within the basal pontine nuclei (Fig. 7B,C), which also project mossy fibers to the cerebellum. Consistent with this, tdTomato+ mossy fiber axons within the white matter layer and mossy fiber terminations within the molecular layer were observed throughout each lobule of the cerebellum (Fig. 7D,E). In addition, a minor subset of cerebellar Purkinje cells was tdTomato+ (Fig. 7F). No tdTomato+ neurons were observed in the deep cerebellar nuclei. We found very few neurons within the hippocampus expressed tdTomato (Fig. 7G,H), but some tdTomato+ fibers were noted within the molecular layer surrounding the dentate gyrus granule cell layer (Fig. 7I). In the cerebral cortex, tdTomato expression was found in a small number of pyramidal neurons, many of which were found in Layers V and VI. In addition, a small number of neurons in the caudoputamen expressed tdTomato.
tdTomato expression within the brainstem and brain of P2X2-tdTomato mice. A, tdTomato (white) expression in sagittal section at 1 mm lateral to the midline. Ecu, external cuneate nucleus; nTS, nucleus tractus solitarius. B–L, tdTomato (red) expression counterstained with NeuroTrace (green). B, Basal pontine nucleus. C, High magnification of area identified in B. D, Cerebellum. E, High magnification of area identified in D showing white matter and internal granule layer. F, High magnification of area identified in D showing internal granule layer, Purkinje cells and the molecular layer. G, Hippocampus. DG, dentate gyrus. H, Suprapyramidal blade of the dentate gyrus. GC layer, granular cell layer. I, Apex of the dentate gyrus. J, Cerebral cortex; inset shows tdTomato expression without NeuroTrace. L5, layer 5; L6, layer 6; WM, white matter. K, L, Caudoputamen with (H) and without (I) NeuroTrace. Scale bars: 2 mm (A), 400 μm (D), 300 μm (G), 100 μm (B, J), 80 μm (H, I), 60 μm (C, F, K, L), 50 μm (J, inset), and 40 μm (E).
Next, we investigated tdTomato expression in the carotid body, tongue, trachea, and esophagus, tissues that are thought to be innervated by P2X2-expressing afferents (Rong et al., 2003; Finger et al., 2005; Yu et al., 2005; Kwong et al., 2008; Mazzone and Undem, 2016). In the carotid body, we observed dense terminations of glossopharyngeal tdTomato-expressing fibers innervating TH-expressing glomus type 1 cells (Fig. 8A,B). We found tdTomato-expressing fibers innervating fungiform, filiform, and circumvallate papillae on the tongue (Fig. 8C–E). Intragemmal tdTomato+ terminations were observed in fungiform taste buds, along with the occasional perigemmal tdTomato+ terminations. In addition, tdTomato was observed in a subset of cells within the taste buds, which are likely taste cells (Huang et al., 2011). In wholemount preparations of the trachea, we found tdTomato-expressing fibers throughout the entire trachea, although there were far more innervating the dorsal membranous part of the trachea (trachealis muscle regions) than in the anterolateral membranous parts over the cartilaginous rings and ligaments (data not shown). In the membranous portion, tdTomato-expressing fibers were observed from the epithelial layer through to the adventitia (Fig. 8F). Distinct patterns of tdTomato-expressing fibers were noted in each layer. In the adventitia, dense cabling of fibers coursed parallel to the epithelial surface (Fig. 8G). In places, individual thin, punctate-like fibers were observed branching off the larger tdTomato-expressing axons that appeared to travel in bundles (Fig. 8G, inset). Multiple fibers climbed up to the smooth muscle layer, which was densely innervated with a host of parallel fibers following the transversal axis of the trachealis muscle (Fig. 8H). We found numerous tdTomato-expressing intraepithelial terminations within the membranous part of the trachea. These tended to have similar structures: parental axons proceeding up through the submucosal layer and then undergoing numerous branching in the subepithelial layer resulting in dense highly arborized structures intercalated with the tracheal epithelium (Fig. 8I,J). Nerve tracing software was able to show that each branch in the arbor was connected to the same parental axon, but we were unable to determine whether the nearby arbors were derived from the same nerve. Lastly, we observed tdTomato-expressing fibers within the mucosal and submucosal layers of the esophagus (Fig. 8K). Often axons ran together through these layers in bundles of more than five axons, but individual punctate-like terminations could also be observed.
tdTomato expression in nerves innervating carotid bodies, taste buds, trachea, and esophagus of P2X2-tdTomato mice. A, Carotid body type 1 cells expressing TH (green) are innervated by nerves expressing tdTomato (red). B, Higher magnification of area identified in A. C–E, Taste bud on the surface of the tongue is innervated by nerves expressing tdTomato (red). DAPI staining (blue) identifies cell nuclei. D, E, Higher magnification of area identified in C. Arrowhead denotes intragemmal fibers, arrow denotes perigemmal fiber. Note the expression of tdTomato in a subset of taste cells within the taste bud. F–J, tdTomato-expressing fibers throughout the epithelial, submucosal, trachealis muscle, and adventitial layers in a wholemount preparation of the trachea. F, Complete z projection, with tdTomato expression pseudocolor indicating the z depth (total of 182 μm). G, Extensive cabling of tdTomato-expressing fibers (red) in the adventitial layer with some of the muscle layer (63 μm in depth). Inset, Higher magnification of area identified in G. Arrowhead highlights an example of a punctate multibranched fiber branching off a thick bundle of broad axons. H, tdTomato-expressing fibers (red) innervating the trachealis muscle layer (25 μm in depth). I, J, tdTomato-expressing intraepithelial terminations (red) within the epithelial layer. Terminal arborizations were traced using Neurolucida software (J). K, tdTomato-expressing fibers (red) in the submucosa and mucosal muscle layers in a wholemount preparation of the esophagus. Scale bars: 100 μm (A, C, F, G, H, I, J, K) and 30 μm (B, D, E, G, inset).
Lastly, we investigated the expression of tdTomato in the cochlea, based on reports that P2X2 is important for purinergic-mediated adaptation and protection against noise-induced ototoxicity (Yan et al., 2013; Cederholm et al., 2019). We found robust expression of tdTomato in numerous specialized cells within the organ of Corti, including in the inner hair cells, outer hair cells, Deiters cells, Hensen’s cells, and the outer pillar cells (Fig. 9). No tdTomato expression was noted in the basilar membrane. We also found tdTomato expression in the superficial interdental cells on the spiral limbus, and in some cells within the spiral ligament. Importantly, tdTomato was not found in any spiral sensory neurons within the spiral ganglia, nor in their fibers that innervate the hair cells.
tdTomato expression within the cochlear of P2X2-tdTomato mice. A, Section with tdTomato expression (red) including afferent cell bodies in the spiral ganglion, the spiral limbus, spiral ligament, and the organ of Corti, counterstained with NeuroTrace (green) and DAPI (blue). The tectorial membrane is missing from this section. B, Higher magnification of the organ of Corti from A. The following additional structures are identified: basilar membrane (BM), inner hair cells (IHC), outer hair cells (OHC), outer pillar cells (OPC). Scale bars: 100 μm (A) and 30 μm (B).
Discussion
P2X2 expression has previously been assessed in multiple cell types using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, RT-PCR, and functional sensitivity to ATP and other P2X ligands. Although it is generally agreed that P2X2 is expressed on at least some peripheral afferent neurons, there is substantial disagreement regarding the precise details of its expression. Here, we have used a genetic approach, producing a knock-in P2X2 Cre mouse that allows for the visualization of P2X2 gene expression systematically. We replaced the endogenous P2X2 stop codon with a 2A-Cre cassette. 2A is a self-cleaving peptide, thus expression of Cre recombinase peptides is expected to match P2X2 peptide expression on a one-to-one basis. This gene-targeted Cre expression system is more efficient than internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequences (Furler et al., 2001; Gao et al., 2012) that have often been used in other knock-in Cre reporters.
The vagal ganglia are composed of nodose afferent neurons and jugular afferent neurons, both of which project sensory nerve terminals to multiple visceral organs. We found that almost all nodose neurons expressed tdTomato compared with almost none of the jugular neurons, thus indicating the selective expression of P2X2 in the nodose portion of the vagal ganglia. Unlike in guinea pigs and larger mammals, the nodose and jugular ganglion are fused in mice. In these studies, we have, based on the idiosyncratic gross anatomy of each ganglion, subjectively assigned a hard line separating the nodose and jugular portions. This is likely an oversimplification of the distribution of nodose and jugular neurons, which are sometimes not perfectly delineated (Nassenstein et al., 2010; Surdenikova et al., 2012). As such, a small number of P2X2+ and P2X2– neurons may have been inappropriately assigned. Overall, our data are consistent with single neuron RT-PCR and RNA-seq analysis of nodose and jugular neurons, which show that while P2X3 is expressed by almost all vagal neurons, P2X2 expression is restricted to nodose neurons (Kwong et al., 2008; Nassenstein et al., 2010; Surdenikova et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2017; Trancikova et al., 2018; Kupari et al., 2019). ATP or αβmATP produces little to no activation of jugular afferents because of the rapid desensitization of homomeric P2X3 channels, whereas these purinergic agonists evoke robust activation of dissociated nodose neurons and nodose peripheral terminals because of their persistent activation of heteromeric P2X2/3 receptors (Undem et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2005; Kwong et al., 2008; Nassenstein et al., 2010). Indeed, knock-out of P2X2 converts ATP-evoked currents in nodose neurons into rapidly desensitizing P2X3-like currents (Cockayne et al., 2005). We found that Ca2+ influx responses to αβmATP in individual vagal neurons were correlated with tdTomato expression, confirming that the functional presence of P2X2-like responses was consistent with P2X2 reporter expression. P2X2 expression was noted in both TRPV1+ and TRPV1– nodose populations, consistent with previous studies (Undem et al., 2004; Kwong et al., 2008; Taylor-Clark et al., 2015).
Compared with the vagal ganglia, there is greater uncertainty regarding the expression of P2X2 in the DRG and trigeminal ganglia. P2X2 immunoreactivity was reported to be in the majority of DRG neurons (Petruska et al., 2000b; Cockayne et al., 2005), and this immunoreactivity was absent in P2X2 knock-out mice (Cockayne et al., 2005). Nevertheless, using mixed or persistent ATP-evoked currents as a marker of P2X2 expression, there are reports that P2X2 expression ranges from ∼10% to 50% of DRG neurons (Cockayne et al., 2000, 2005; Dunn et al., 2000; Petruska et al., 2000a,b). Our data indicate that ∼12% of DRG neurons express P2X2. This restricted expression is consistent with single neuron RT-PCR and RNA-seq analysis of DRG neurons (Kwong et al., 2008; Surdenikova et al., 2012; Usoskin et al., 2015; Trancikova et al., 2018; Hockley et al., 2019). P2X2 immunoreactivity has also been reported to be in a large number of trigeminal neurons (Spehr et al., 2004; Ambalavanar et al., 2005; Simonetti et al., 2006; Staikopoulos et al., 2007). Mixed or persistent ATP-evoked currents have been noted in ∼15–75% of trigeminal neurons (Spehr et al., 2004; Damann et al., 2006; Luo et al., 2006; Simonetti et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2015). Our data indicate that ∼4% trigeminal neurons express P2X2. It is possible that P2X2’s contribution to “persistent” ATP-evoked currents in trigeminal neurons has been overestimated because of context-dependent P2X3 desensitization kinetics (Bianchi et al., 1999; Sokolova et al., 2006) and the contribution of other purinergic channels such as P2X1, P2X4, and P2X5, which are also expressed in trigeminal neurons (Kuroda et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2015).
Previous immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization studies have demonstrated widespread and robust P2X2 expression throughout the rodent CNS, including in the nTS, area postrema, ventrolateral medulla, medial vestibular nucleus, spinal trigeminal nucleus, hippocampus, hypothalamus, thalamus, striatum, substantia nigra, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex (Kidd et al., 1995; Collo et al., 1996; Vulchanova et al., 1996; Kanjhan et al., 1999; Yao et al., 2000, 2003; Gourine et al., 2003). However, based on the inconsistencies of previous P2X2 detection in sensory ganglia, we briefly investigated the CNS expression of P2X2 with our reporter mouse. In general, we found P2X2 expression in the CNS was limited compared with previous reports. Consistent with the widespread expression of tdTomato in nodose and petrosal neurons we found tdTomato-expressing central terminals within multiple subnuclei throughout the nTS and in the area postrema. Thus, P2X2-expressing terminals target the same areas as terminals that express 5HT3 (another nodose neuronal marker that is expressed in very few jugular neurons; Kim et al., 2020). The nTS is the major target of vagal, geniculate, and petrosal ganglia afferents and is involved in reflex control of the cardiovascular, respiratory, and digestive systems. Consistent with the expression of tdTomato in few trigeminal neurons, there was little tdTomato expression in the spinal trigeminal nucleus or the paratrigeminal complex in the medulla. This distinguishes the P2X2-tdTomato expression observed here from 5HT3-tdTomato expression, as 5HT3 is expressed in a large number of trigeminal afferents (Kim et al., 2020). This suggests that vagal terminations in the paratrigeminal complex (Driessen et al., 2015; McGovern et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2020), which may play a role in defensive reflexes from the airways, are exclusively via jugular afferents. There was limited tdTomato expression in the thoracic spinal cord, with the majority observed in fibers terminating in the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn. These are most likely to be the central projections of the limited number of DRG afferents that express P2X2.
There was little tdTomato expression throughout the rest of the brainstem, with the exception of a subset of neurons in the pontine nucleus and lateral reticular nucleus, both of which project glutamatergic mossy fibers to the cerebellum (Kratochwil et al., 2017). In particular, we found only sparse P2X2 expression in the intermediate/caudal ventrolateral medulla and virtually no P2X2 expression in the rostral ventrolateral medulla. Previous studies of ATP-evoked modulation of respiratory neurons within these regions have suggested that these actions correlated with P2X2 immunoreactivity (Gourine et al., 2003; Yao et al., 2003). P2X2 expression in mossy fibers has been reported previously (Collo et al., 1996; Kanjhan et al., 1999), and these channels are thought to be distributed along the projections to the cerebellum (Florenzano et al., 2002). Indeed, we observed robust tdTomato expression in a large number of mossy fibers within the cerebellum. tdTomato expression was limited in other brain regions to very few neurons. Of note, we found few P2X2-expressing neurons within the hippocampus, despite immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization studies identifying widespread P2X2 expression in neurons within the CA1-3 and dentate gyrus (Kidd et al., 1995; Kanjhan et al., 1999), and a transgenic mouse model with a P2X2 fusion protein with yellow fluorescent protein identifying P2X expression in hippocampal mossy fibers (Haustein et al., 2014).
We exploited the robust expression of tdTomato throughout P2X2-expressing peripheral nerves to study their anatomy. As expected, glossopharyngeal afferents (projected from petrosal neurons) innervating the glomus type 1 cells in the carotid body expressed P2X2. Type 1 cells are the principle peripheral chemoreceptors, and P2X2 receptors are required for hypoxic signaling (although not CO2 detection) from the carotid body (Rong et al., 2003). The structural relationship between the P2X2-expressing fibers and the type 1 cells is consistent with previous immunohistochemical studies (Yokoyama et al., 2019). Gustatory afferents innervating taste buds in the tongue expressed P2X2, consistent with the critical role of this receptor in taste cell-afferent signaling (Finger et al., 2005). Previous research has also shown P2X2 expression in taste buds using RT-PCR, and signaling of taste cell P2X2 may act as autocrine, positive feedback signal to amplify taste-evoked ATP secretion (Huang et al., 2011). Our data suggest that P2X2 expression occurs in only a subset of taste cells.
We investigated P2X2-expressing terminals in the trachea and esophagus, which are likely projected from nodose neurons (Ricco et al., 1996; Yu et al., 2005; Kwong et al., 2008; Prescott et al., 2020). Previous studies of vagal afferent terminations in the mouse trachea using GFP expression following intraganglionic injections of an AAV-GFP construct have identified two classes of vagal afferents in the membranous area of the trachea: dorsal terminal structures that had fibers running largely in parallel to the smooth muscle but did not penetrate the epithelial layer, and small intraepithelial terminals (Hennel et al., 2018). Based on the similar morphology, it is likely that the P2X2-expressing terminals observed in the trachea in the current study are a combination of dorsal terminal structures and small intraepithelial terminals, thus suggesting that these terminals are projected by nodose (P2X2-expressing) neurons. Interestingly, the major vagal nerve terminal type found in the ligamentous part of the mouse trachea (termed “anterolateral segmental array”) by Hennel et al. (2018) was not labeled in P2X2-tdTomato mice, indicating that these probably originate from jugular neurons. Previous tracheal studies have identified A-fiber terminals with complex dendritic arbors innervating the epithelium and subepithelial layers over the cartilage rings in rats (Yamamoto and Nakamuta, 2018) and in the subepithelial layer over the ends of the cartilage rings in guinea pigs (Mazzone et al., 2009). Despite the fact that tracheal A-fibers are likely projected from nodose neurons (Mazzone et al., 2009), they were not detected in either the present study in P2X2-tdTomato mice or in the AAV-GFP mouse study by Hennel et al. (2018), suggesting species differences in A-fiber innervation of the trachea. This interpretation is somewhat complicated by the lack of αβmATP sensitivity in nodose Aδ fibers innervating the guinea pig trachea (Canning et al., 2004), suggesting that these nodose fibers surprisingly do not express P2X2. However, there are no published reports of P2X2 expression in guinea pig nodose neurons labeled from the trachea, so definitive conclusions are not possible at this time. We also observed tdTomato-expressing fibers in the esophageal mucosa, which is innervated by nodose, jugular and DRG afferents (Yu et al., 2005; Surdenikova et al., 2012; Ru et al., 2015). Similar nerve structures were identified in the mouse esophageal mucosa following vagal intraganglionic injections of AAV-GFP (Harsanyiova et al., 2020). Thus, it is likely that the esophageal fibers identified here are projected by nodose (P2X2-expressing) neurons.
Lastly, we found evidence of P2X2 expression in hair cells and their support cells within the organ of Corti in the cochlea. Previous studies have shown that both inner and outer hair cells express P2X2, which mediate ATP-induced cationic currents (Housley et al., 1999; Järlebark et al., 2002). We found no expression of P2X2 in the spiral ganglionic afferents that innervate the inner and outer hair cells, in disagreement with some immunohistochemical studies and dissociated patch clamp studies (Järlebark et al., 2002; Weisz et al., 2009; Ito and Dulon, 2010). Knock-out of P2X2 has no effect on auditory thresholds in non-aged mice (Yan et al., 2013), indicating that this channel is not critical to neurotransmission between the inner hair cells and the type 1 spiral afferents. Nevertheless, P2X2 knock-out accelerates noise-induced ototoxicity (Yan et al., 2013). Noise evokes local ATP release which causes P2X2-mediated dampening of the cochlea amplifier by modifying the electromotility properties of the outer hair cells (Yu and Zhao, 2008; Housley et al., 2013; Cederholm et al., 2019). This paracrine humeral purinergic signaling is thought to complement the medial olivocochlear reflex suppression of the cochlear amplifier that is mediated by the type 2 spiral afferents that innervate the outer hair cells (Froud et al., 2015). Our observation of P2X2 only in the hair cells and support cells is consistent with recent research that directly implicated the outer hair cell rather than the spiral afferents in the P2X2-mediated pathways (Cederholm et al., 2019).
In summary, the P2X2-cre reporter mouse demonstrates that P2X2 expression is limited to subsets of neurons and specialized cells in the cochlea. Previous reports using biochemical techniques have overestimated the number of cell types that express P2X2. This mouse provides a genetic approach to the identification and manipulation of P2X2-expressing cell types. The current study used ROSA26-loxP-STOP-loxP-tdTomato mice to visualize cre-mediated recombination in the P2X2-cre-expressing cells. It should be noted that the excision of the loxP-flanked stop region on cre expression is irreversible, thus tdTomato expression cannot discriminate between transient and current P2X2 expression in a given cell. It is possible that some of the tdTomato expression described here is because of transient P2X2 expression.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health’s Office of Director SPARC Commonfund Program Grant OT2OD023854, the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant U01NS113868, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants R01DK110366 and U01DK116311.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.