Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts

eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Negative Results, Sensory and Motor Systems

The Effects of a Ketogenic Diet on Sensorimotor Function in a Thoracolumbar Mouse Spinal Cord Injury Model

Kyle A. Mayr, Charlie H.T. Kwok, Shane E.A. Eaton, Glen B. Baker and Patrick J. Whelan
eNeuro 17 July 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0178-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0178-20.2020
Kyle A. Mayr
1Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
2Department of Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
3Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kyle A. Mayr
Charlie H.T. Kwok
1Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
2Department of Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
3Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Charlie H.T. Kwok
Shane E.A. Eaton
3Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glen B. Baker
4Department of Psychiatry (NRU), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick J. Whelan
1Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
2Department of Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
3Department of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patrick J. Whelan
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Spinal cord injury and peripheral nerve injuries are traumatic events that greatly impact quality of life. One factor that is being explored throughout patient care is the idea of diet and the role it has on patient outcomes. But the effects of diet following neurotrauma need to be carefully explored in animal models to ensure that they have beneficial effects. The ketogenic diet provides sufficient daily caloric requirements while being potentially neuroprotective and analgesic. In this study, animals were fed a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet that led to a high concentration of blood ketone that was sustained for as long as the animals were on the diet. Mice fed a ketogenic diet had significantly lower levels of tyrosine and tryptophan, but the levels of other monoamines within the spinal cord remained similar to those of control mice. Mice were fed a standard or ketogenic diet for 7 d before and 28 d following the injury. Our results show that mice hemisected over the T10–T11 vertebrae showed no beneficial effects of being on a ketogenic diet over a 28 d recovery period. Similarly, ligation of the common peroneal and tibial nerve showed no differences between mice fed normal or ketogenic diets. Tests included von Frey, open field, and ladder-rung crossing. We add to existing literature showing protective effects of the ketogenic diet in forelimb injuries by focusing on neurotrauma in the hindlimbs. The results suggest that ketogenic diets need to be assessed based on the type and location of neurotrauma.

  • function
  • ketogenic diet
  • plasticity
  • spinal cord injury
  • therapies

Significance Statement

There is an urgent need for therapeutics to improve outcomes for patients with neurotrauma. Here we test the effects of a noninvasive diet-based therapy. Ketogenic diets, which are high fat and low carbohydrate based, have been shown to be effective in treating epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease, and show promise for treating other neurotrauma and neurodegenerative conditions. Here we show that while we were successful in producing high ketone concentrations in mice, the effects on the recovery of function and pain following a thoracic spinal cord hemisection or spared nerve injury were minimal. Therefore, ketogenic diets, while effective in certain cases, should be evaluated depending on the injury type.

Introduction

Nerve injuries to the CNS and peripheral nervous system comprise a heterogeneous group of conditions that cause significant disability and also share common characteristics. There are multiple underlying causes contributing to peripheral nerve injury and spinal cord injury (SCI) such as neurotrauma, demyelination, and autoimmune disorders (Ahuja and Fehlings, 2016). In addition to movement disorders, patients with neural injuries have high incidences of persistent pain. Epidemiological data suggest that 53% of SCI patients experience pain (Burke et al., 2017), with the global prevalence of neuropathic pain (i.e., pain as a result of nerve injuries) estimated at 7% (van Hecke et al., 2014). More importantly, persistent pain inhibits patients from adhering to rehabilitative therapies (Turk and Rudy, 1991); thus, pain and loss in motor functions form a negative feedback loop that further perpetuates disabilities (Thompson et al., 2016).

For patients with nerve injuries, improvement in motor functions and reduction in chronic pain are important for quality of life (Adams and Hicks, 2005; Jensen et al., 2007). However, few therapies exist to target both pain and motor functions simultaneously, in part because of the diversity in etiologies and disease progress. Most therapies targeting neurodegeneration and pain are symptomatic and do little to halt further loss in function (Scholz et al., 2009). Existing pain therapies including gabapentin and opioids all have side effects (Teasell et al., 2010), with the development of tolerance and dependence hindering treatment success. Overall, patients rely on combinatorial therapies, requiring multiple types of medications and management, thus resulting in suboptimal rates of adherence to their prescriptions. The identification of a more comprehensive therapy that targets pain and movement disorders is urgently needed for improving care in nerve injuries (Simpson et al., 2012; Teasell et al., 2010).

A key feature of nerve injury is neuroplasticity, which broadly manifests as changes in neuronal excitability and may aid spontaneous recovery by allowing sprouting of neural fibers reinforcing reflex and propriospinal pathways (Bareyre et al., 2004; Finnerup and Baastrup, 2012). However, mechanisms underlying neuroplasticity may also negatively impact on pain and spasticity (Brown and Weaver, 2012) when maladaptive synaptogenesis occurs. Changes in levels of neuromodulators including serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline are crucial facilitators of neuroplasticity (Azmitia, 1999; Nitsche et al., 2006; Marzo et al., 2009). Importantly, each of these neuromodulators engages in diverse physiological functions, including cognition, mood regulation, movement, and somatosensation; the therapeutic potential in targeting these neuromodulatory systems is hampered by their diverse physiological roles.

Different diet regimes hold promise as non-pharmacological alternatives to treat neural injury. Metabolism influences brain activity (Ruskin and Masino, 2012), and metabolic functions, in turn, depend on the diet (Flint et al., 2015). Studies investigating the clinical utility of metabolic therapies, such as the ketogenic diet (KD), indicate effectiveness in epilepsy, brain cancer, type 2 diabetes, and neurodegeneration (Barañano and Hartman, 2008). KD promotes the use of ketone bodies as energy sources by minimizing glucose metabolism and increasing ketolysis. By replacing glucose with ketone bodies, a direct consequence is enhanced cellular capacity in energy generation, increasing the availability of high-energy molecules including ATP and phosphocreatine (Ruskin and Masino, 2012). Other work has shown an indirect link between KD and the increase in inhibitory neuromodulators such as adenosine and GABA (Yudkoff et al., 2007). Hence, KD may be associated with a role in balancing neuronal excitability. In SCI, KD increased mobility, range of motion, and dexterity in the forepaws of rats following a high cervical SCI (Streijger et al., 2013). Interestingly, a combinatorial therapy that included KD, ibuprofen, ghrelin, and a peptide (C16), did not improve motor function (Streijger et al., 2014). However, there has been little research on the effects of KD on lumbar SCI or peripheral nerve injury. This is important since cervical segments control precision movements of the digits, during grasp for example, compared with more rhythmic movements of the hindlimbs that can be generated by spinal circuits.

The current study explores the therapeutic potential of KD in regulating motor and pain dysfunctions in nerve injuries. In C57BL/6 mice, two of the most common nerve injury models including a thoracic hemisection (SCI) and the spared nerve injury (SNI) were performed to mimic damage to the CNS and peripheral nervous system, respectively. A battery of sensory and motor behavioral tests were performed before and after the injuries to test baseline and postinjury effects of KD. The levels of neuromodulators were compared between mice fed standard chow and KD.

Materials and Methods

All animals used were C57/BL6 male mice between 8 and 16 weeks of age during testing. All animal experiments were approved by the University of Calgary animal care committee and are catalogued under the protocol AC15-0026.

Ketogenic diet administration

The following two standard diets were used with the animals in this study and were given ad libitum: Pellet diet (PD) and 6:1 KD. All animals were initially fed a standard pellet diet ad libitum [Pico-Vac Mouse Diet 20 (Lot 5062), LabDiet] given in the hanging feeding rack of the cages. KD animals were fasted for 1 evening (12 h), a week before testing and were given ∼15 g of frozen KD chow daily (catalog #S3666, Bio-Serv) to ensure ketone blood levels were above the threshold for ketosis (Smith et al., 2016). Nutritional composition and macronutrient levels are listed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Nutritional composition of administered diets

Ketone blood sampling

Blood ketone concentrations were sampled using blood draws from the tail. Approximately 1.5–2 µl was extracted by making a superficial cut ∼1 mm from the end of the tail using a #10 scalpel blade (catalog #10 010–00, Fine Science Tools). The blood was massaged out of the tail, and this was tested using a ketone blood monitor (Freestyle Precision Neo, Abbott Laboratories) and keto testing strips (Abbott blood β-ketone test strip, Abbott Laboratories). All values were recorded in the software for offline analysis.

HPLC tissue collection

In a cohort of 26 animals, mice were randomized and coded before being sacrificed after 28 d of being in ketosis. KD animals underwent the standard KD diet paradigm as outlined above. On the day of tissue collection, animals were sacrificed using high doses of isoflurane (5%) in an induction chamber. The spinal column was extracted by cutting the sacrum and cervical vertebral levels using large scissors. The spinal cord was extracted using a 10 ml syringe loaded with aCSF with fluid pressure initiated in the lumbar region. The spinal cord was trimmed to contain only the lumbar enlargement (L1–L6), and the spinal cords were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. The spinal cord was analyzed for biogenic amines by modifications of a previously reported method (Parent et al., 2001). Tissue was homogenized in ice-cold 0.1N perchloric acid containing EDTA (10 mg%) and ascorbic acid (50 μm). The homogenate was centrifuged and 10 µl of supernatant was used in the HPLC assay using an Atlantis dC18 column (Waters) and an electrochemical detector.

Surgical intervention

All surgical procedures were performed using aseptic techniques under isoflurane anesthesia between 1% and 2% delivered by 0.4 L/min medical grade oxygen (100% oxygen; Vitalair 1072, Hosokawa). The area of surgical intervention was shaved using animal shears, cleaned with betadine 5% solution, and sterilized with 95% ethanol.

Spared nerve injury

Once anesthetized and prepared, a superficial cut of 1 cm was made in the left hindleg in the skin above the midline of the femur, above the knee joint to below the hip joint. The skin was resected from the fascia by blunt dissection to properly view the musculature of the triceps surae and the biceps femoris. The muscles were separated along where both intersect. The sciatic nerve was isolated between the trifurcation of the common peroneal (CP)/Tibial nerve (Tib) and the sural nerve with surrounding fascia removed. Both the CP and Tib were ligated using one 6–0 suture (catalog #18 020–60, Fine Science Tools). The nerves were then cut on the distal end of the suture to create a full transection of both the Tib and CP while leaving the sural nerve intact. For sham procedures, the nerves were exposed and identified but were left intact. Open wounds and musculature were sutured using a 4–0 dissolvable suture in an interrupted fashion with tissue adhesive (Vetbond, 3M) on the skin and sutures to secure the knots. SNI procedures were verified during surgeries and post hoc.

Spinal cord injury

A superficial incision was made 2 cm in length along the midline of the thoracolumbar vertebral column (T10–T13) where the curvature of the back is most pronounced. The skin and fascia were dissected away from the underlying musculature to expose the underlying vertebrae and surrounding muscles. An incision along both sides of the midline of the T10–T11 dorsal spinous processes was performed, and a muscular resection exposed the underlying vertebrae. The underlying vertebrae were blunt dissected using curved forceps (catalog #11 154–10, Fine Science Tools) to expose the dorsal processes and the intervertebral disk. The intervertebral disk was removed, and the underlying spinal cord was exposed. Partial laminectomies (half of the vertebrae) were performed between the T10–T11 vertebrae to expose sufficient spinal cord for a hemisection while maintaining structural integrity and preserving the dorsal roots (rongeur, catalog #16 221–14, Fine Science Tools,). The spinal cord hemisection was performed using a 30 gauge one-half inch needle (catalog #305106, BD) inserted into the midline of the spinal cord until the ventral vertebrae were reached. The cord was then cut in a perpendicular motion toward the lateral edge of the vertebrae, hemisecting the spinal cord on the left side of the animal. For sham procedures, the spinal cord was exposed with a laminectomy, but no hemisection was performed. Animals were given buprenorphine at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, i.p., before removing from isoflurane anesthetic. Animals were assessed daily after injuries to verify proper pain management and whether any postoperative complications had occurred. No extra analgesic was required following the day of surgery. SCIs were verified visually at the time of surgery and post hoc.

Behavioral and pain testing

Randomization

All experiments were randomized and blinded. Randomization was performed using a random number generator (www.random.org) each day of experimentation to make sure animals were not habituated to specific boxes or positions in the tests. Animals were tested in cohorts of 12, divided into the following three groups: SHAM, Injury+PD, and Injury+KD. All animals in each cohort were assigned a reference number between 1 and 12. On testing days, the random number generator provided a 2 × 6 matrix of randomly assigned numbers between 1 and 12 indicative of either the position of placement in the testing apparatus or the order in which an animal was tested. This method ensured that animals were not habituated to either the specific location in the testing apparatuses or the time of day that the testing was performed.

von Frey

Mechanical allodynia was assessed by measuring the hind paw withdrawal threshold to von Frey hairs (vFhs). Animals were placed individually into Plexiglas testing chambers on a raised mesh surface to allow access to the hindpaws and were habituated for 30 min before testing. Baseline mechanical sensitivity was determined for each animal before the injuries. A range of vFhs were used (0.2–2 g), the presence or absence of a withdrawal response was recorded, and the withdrawal threshold was calculated using the up-down method of Dixon (Chaplan et al., 1994).

Open field test

For open field tests (OFTs), animals were habituated to the room for 1 h before tests were administered. Animals were placed into the open field boxes (Cleversys Systems) four boxes at a time. The open field protocol was set for 30 min from the time of insertion into the arena. The center of the box was defined by 25% of the size of the total arena in the center of the box. The periphery was defined as the total area of the box minus the center area and covers the periphery around the center to the walls of the open field.

Ladder rung

For ladder-rung testing and scoring, we adapted previously reported methods (Metz and Whishaw, 2009). The ladder-rung system was constructed of Plexiglas sides and used a 2-mm-diameter round, 100-mm-long steel bar for the rungs. The rungs were spaced randomly, and the spacing was not changed throughout the experiments. Animals were habituated and exposed to the test on 3 separate testing days before injuries occurred. During habituation and data acquisition, animals were passed over the ladder rung a total of three times, and the average step scores and faults were determined daily. Animals were introduced into the right side of the apparatus to allow full visualization of the injured left hindlimb. The order of the animals placed on the ladder rung was randomized on each testing day. Each session was recorded using a high-speed camera (VIXIA HF R52 HD, Canon) recorded at 60 frames/s with a 1080p resolution. Scoring was performed post hoc by separate personnel who were blinded to the condition of the mice. Scoring was based on the 6 point scale outlined in the study by Metz and Whishaw (2009; Table 2), with a score of 0 denoting when a hindlimb completely missed the rung leading to a break in the weight-bearing gait. By comparison, a score of 5 would indicate a slight malposition of the hindlimb on a rung of the test, with a score of 6 being perfect placement on the ladder rung. Decoding and interpretation of the data were performed by other personnel in the laboratory to minimize bias.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Ladder-run foot scoring scale

Statistics

All data were tested for normality using the D’Agostino and Pearson tests. Data that were normally distributed were subsequently analyzed using parametric tests; nonparametric tests were used to analyze data that were not normally distributed. Analysis of behavioral data was performed using repeated-measures two-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni multiple comparisons or a mixed-effects analysis. The factors were treatment (KD vs PD) and time (before and after injuries). Analysis of baseline behavioral changes, neuromodulator levels (HPLC), and ketone blood concentrations between KD and PD animals were performed with unpaired t tests or Mann–Whitney tests. For all statistical analyses, Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software) was used. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used throughout represented by an asterisk in figures.

Results

Mice fed ketogenic diet had increased ketone levels and no changes in body weight

We first examined the efficacy of the KD in producing a steady ketosis state in uninjured mice. All animals were tested for blood ketone levels before and following diet administration (Fig. 1A). Animals fed a KD showed the concentration of blood ketones (unpaired t test: t = 6.624, df = 18, p < 0.0001), reaching an average of 1.8 mmol/L ketones that is indicative of ketosis (Ruskin et al., 2009). Animals fed a PD had an average blood ketone level of 0.7 mmol/L. When animals in ketosis were fed PD, they showed a decrease in blood ketone levels 60 min following ingestion (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA; time × diet: F(4,12) = 28.51, p < 0.0001; time: F(1.327,3.980) = 22.78, p = 0.0079; diet: F(1,3) = 51.35, p = 0.0056; Fig. 1B), suggesting that maintenance of high blood ketone levels reliably indicates the state of ketosis. No significant difference in weight between animals fed either KD or PD was detected during the course of the study (mixed-effects analysis: time × diet, p = 0.0164; time, p = 0.005; diet, p = 0.131; Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Blood ketone levels and stability 1 week after administration of ketogenic diet in uninjured mice. A, Blood samples were collected from the tail vein and determined by ketone testing strips and monitoring. Significantly higher ketone blood concentrations were found in mice fed the ketogenic diet compared with a conventional pellet diet. N = 10 each for KD and PD; ****p < 0.0001. B, Mice fed a ketogenic diet reliably remained in ketosis with KD being introduced 7 d prior. In addition, within 1 h of being given a pellet diet, mice were no longer in a state of ketosis. N = 2 for KD; N = 3 for PD. C, Comparison of body weights between mice who were fed the ketogenic and pellet diets without surgical intervention; no significant difference was detected at each time point between the diets. N = 6–10 each for PD and KD. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM.

Levels of monoamines in the mouse spinal cord were unaffected by the ketogenic diet

To investigate whether changes in diet influence expression of monoamines, crucial neuromodulators of locomotion and nociception, we next measured levels of monoamines within the lumbar spinal cord of mice fed with KD or PD using HPLC.

Mice fed KD had significantly lower levels of the essential amino acids tyrosine (unpaired t tests: t = 3.221, df = 21, p = 0.0041; Fig. 2A) and tryptophan (unpaired t tests: t = 2.489, df = 22, p = 0.0209; Fig. 2B). This suggests a lower availability of substrates for the production of monoamines. However, no changes were detected between the diet groups in levels of noradrenaline (unpaired t test: t = 1.022, df = 22, p = 0.3177; Fig. 2C), dopamine (unpaired t test: t = 0.4043, df = 22, p = 0.6899; Fig. 2D), or serotonin (unpaired t test: t = 0.1737, df = 22, p = 0.8637; Fig. 2E). Furthermore, levels of the main metabolite of serotonin, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, remained unaltered (unpaired t test; t = 0.6498, df = 21, p = 0.5228; Fig. 2F).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

The effect of diets on neuromodulator content in the lumbar spinal cord of mice. A, B, Mice fed the ketogenic diet had significantly lower content of the monoamine precursors tyrosine (A) and tryptophan (B); **p = 0.0041 and *p = 0.0209, respectively. C–E, No changes were detected in the levels of monoamines noradrenaline (C), dopamine (D), and serotonin (5-HT; E). There were also no changes in the content of the main metabolite of serotonin, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA; F). N = 18 for PD; N = 6 for KD. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM.

The ketogenic diet had no effect on sensorimotor recovery in the context of a peripheral nerve injury

We sought to understand the effects of KD in sensorimotor recovery following peripheral nerve injury. SNI was performed as animals exhibit motor deficits and pronociceptive phenotypes.

We first examined general locomotion before and after SNI surgeries using open field tests. Mice were allowed to move freely in the open field boxes, and activity was recorded for 30 min. Before SNI surgeries (baseline), mice showed no difference in total distance traveled (Fig. 3A), crossing from the periphery of the box to the center (Fig. 3C), and duration of in-place activity in the OFT (Fig. 3E). Interestingly, the duration of in-place activity in the center, when the animal is active, but not moving outside of a prescribed area, was increased in KD mice compared with PD mice (unpaired t test: t = 2.676, df = 22, p = 0.0138; Fig. 3G). No significant time spent in the center locomoting was observed (Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.054; Fig. 3I). These results indicate that at baseline, mice fed a KD may be less opposed to spending time in the center of the box, which is suggestive of an anxiolytic effect.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

The effect of diet on open-field locomotor behaviors in a model of peripheral nerve injury. Peripheral nerve injury was modeled by SNI; comparison of general locomotor behaviors were made at before (baseline) and after SNI. A–F, No significant differences were observed between the diets in distance traveled (A, B), duration of in-place activity (C, D), and number of crossings from the periphery of the open field box to the center (E, F). G, At baseline, mice fed the ketogenic diet displayed more in-place activity in the center of the box. *p = 0.0138. H, However, no effects of diet were observed after SNI between mice fed a pellet or ketogenic diet. Duration of locomotion in the center of the open field box is a proxy measure of anxiety-like behaviors. The more time spent in the center of the box suggests less anxiety as mice innately avoid bright open spaces. I, At baseline, no significant movement to the center was observed; p = 0.054. J, No effects of the diet were observed after SNI. N = 7–8 for SHAM; N = 8 for SNI + PD; N = 8 for SNI + KD. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM.

General locomotive behaviors were tracked for 28 d after SNI surgeries. No differences were detected between the diets in total distance traveled (Fig. 3B), duration of in-place activity (Fig. 3D), and crossing over from the periphery to the center (Fig. 3F). No changes in the duration of in-place activity (Fig. 3H) or locomotion (Fig. 3J) in the center were observed.

To investigate the effect of diet on nociception, von Frey hair tests were performed to measure mechanical withdrawal thresholds at baseline and after SNI surgeries. There were no differences at baseline (Fig. 4A), but the mechanical withdrawal threshold was significantly lower after SNI (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA: time × treatment: F(8,80) = 1.343, p = 0.2347; time: F(2.98,59.6) = 2.29, p = 0.0879; treatment: F(2,20) = 7.185, p = 0.0045; Fig. 4B). Post hoc analysis revealed that mice fed a KD had significantly lower mechanical withdrawal thresholds 3 d after SNI compared with a PD (KD vs PD, 0.9 vs 0.5575 g; p = 0.0231), but not in the latter time points. This indicates an initial worsening of allodynia (pain evoked by normally non-noxious stimulations) after SNI in KD animals.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

The effect of diet on other sensorimotor behaviors before and after peripheral nerve injury. Comparison of mechanical withdrawal threshold (von Frey hair test) and fine motor behaviors (ladder rung) made before (baseline) and after SNI. A, No difference in the mechanical withdrawal threshold between the diets at baseline. B, Mechanical withdrawal threshold was significantly lower in SNI mice compared with sham mice, indicating the development of mechanical allodynia (pain evoked by normally innocuous stimulations). Post hoc Bonferroni analysis revealed a significant difference between the SHAM+PD and SNI+KD groups on days 3 and 7 after SNI; %p = 0.0038, #p = 0.0117, respectively. The SNI+PD group also had a lower mechanical withdrawal threshold compared with SHAM+PD on day 7 after SNI, $p = 0.0428. Three days after SNI, the SNI+KD group also had significantly lower mechanical withdrawal threshold compared with the SNI+PD group; *p = 0.0231. C, During Ladder rung, there was no difference in the step score of animals at baseline between animals fed the KD vs PD. D, Over the course of 28 days recovery, diet produced no significant changes in recovery. N = 7 for SHAM group, N = 8 for SNI+KD and SNI+PD groups. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM.

To quantify the effects of diet on the recovery of fine motor skills, the ladder-rung test was used to qualitatively score the motor ability of the animals. Animals showed no statistical difference before SNI between groups fed either a PD or KD at baseline (unpaired t test: t = 0.7329, df = 21, p = 0.4717; Fig. 4C). Following injury, animals initially had a reduced ability to cross the ladder-run platform, which recovered over time. However, no difference in recovery was observed between animals fed KD or PD (Fig. 4D; two-way ANOVA; time × treatment: F(6,60) = 1.796, p = 0.1152; treatment: F(2,20) = 1.882, p = 0.1783).

Before the commencement of sensorimotor behavior tests, animals were in ketosis with ketone levels of 2.0 mmol/L ± 0.580 compared with the PD-fed animals with mean ± SD ketone levels of 0.653 mmol/L ± 0.195 mmol/L (unpaired t test: t = 9.228, df = 22, p < 0.0001). Before sacrificing the animals, we took a blood sample and determined the ketone concentrations. The PD average was 0.725 mmol/L ± 0.084, while the KD blood ketone concentration was 2.238 mmol/L ± 1.509 (unpaired t test: t = 3.954, df = 21, p < 0.0007).

The ketogenic diet had no effect on sensorimotor recovery in the context of a spinal cord injury

We next sought to examine the effects of a KD on neurotrauma to the CNS, in particular the thoracolumbar spinal cord. We used the spinal cord hemisection model to produce a repeatable injury. We first examined the motor behavior of the mice in open field boxes. Before SCI (baseline), mice showed no significant differences in motor behaviors when fed KD or PD. Specifically, we found no difference in the distance in the open field (Fig. 5A), time spent in place in the open field (Fig. 5C), total crosses of the outside periphery to the inside area (Fig. 5E), the duration of in-place activity in the center of the open field (Fig. 5G), and time spent locomoting in the center of the box (Fig. 5I).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

The effect of diet on open-field locomotor behaviors in a model of spinal cord injury. SCI was modeled by a hemisection at T12–T13, on the left side of the spinal cord. A comparison of general locomotor behaviors was made before (baseline) and after SCI. A, B, Distance traveled after 30 min in the OFT; there was no significant difference at baseline between PD-fed and KD-fed animals (A) or following injury (B). C, D, No difference in the number of crosses from the periphery of the open field box to the center. E, G, At baseline, mice fed the ketogenic diet displayed no differences in activity in place in the entirety of the arena (E) or in the center of the box (G). F, H, No significant effects of diet were observed for in-place activity after SCI between PD- and KD-fed mice in either the arena (F) or the center of the box (H). The duration of locomotion in the center of the open field box is a proxy measure of anxiety-like behaviors. The more time spent in the center of the box indicates less anxiety as mice innately avoid bright open spaces. I, Nonsignificant difference at baseline in mice fed a KD versus mice fed a PD during locomotion in the center of the open field (Student’s t test, p = 0.548). J, No effects of the diet were observed after SCI except for in the time domain; two-way ANOVA, p = 0.008. There were no significant differences between animals in the KD group and the PD group following injury (two-way ANOVA, p = 0.8994). N = 8 for SHAM, N = 8 for the SCI+PD group, N = 8 for SCI + KD group. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM.

General locomotor behaviors were tracked for 28 d following SCI. No differences were detected between the diets in total distance traveled in the open field (two-way ANOVA; time × treatment: F(8,84) = 2.617, p = 0.0131; treatment: F(2,21) = 0.5886, p = 0.5640; Fig. 5B), duration of in-place activity (Fig. 5D), crossing from the periphery to the center of the box (two-way ANOVA; time × treatment: F(8,84) = 2.907, p = 0.0065; treatment: F(2,21) = 0.007431, p = 0.9926; Fig. 5F). No differences were present between treatment groups in the duration of in-place activity in the center of the box (Fig. 5H), along with no difference in the time spent locomoting in the center of the open field (Fig. 5J).

vFh tests were performed to investigate nociception following SCI. At baseline, animals fed PD chow did not show any marked differences from animals fed a KD (unpaired t test: t = 0.385, df = 22, p = 0.7038, Fig. 6A). Following SCI, no significant changes to the withdrawal threshold over the course of recovery were found (two-way ANOVA, time × treatment: F(6,84) = 0.9613, p = 0.457; trea.tment: F(1,14) = 2.02, p = 0.178; Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

The effect of diet on other sensorimotor behaviors before and after spinal cord injury. SCI was modeled by a hemisection T12–T13, left side of the spinal cord. Comparison of mechanical withdrawal threshold (von Frey hair test) and fine motor behaviors (ladder rung) was made at before (baseline) and after SNI. A, B, No difference in mechanical withdrawal threshold between the diets at baseline (A) or after SCI (B). C, There was no difference in the step score of animals at baseline between animals fed the KD versus those fed the PD. D, Diet produced no significant changes over the course of 28 d on the rehabilitation of motor recovery. N = 8 each for SHAM, SNI+KD, and SNI+PD. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM.

To quantify the effects of diet on the recovery of fine motor skills, the ladder-run test was used to qualitatively score the motor ability of the animals. Animals showed no statistical difference between groups fed either PD or KD at baseline (unpaired t test: t = 0.1162, df = 22, p = 0.9086, Fig. 6C). Following injury, both injury groups had a reduced ladder-run score, compared with the sham mice (two-way ANOVA; time × treatment: F(8,84) = 5.024, p < 0.0001; treatment: F(2,21) = 23.87, p < 0.0001, Fig. 6D). However, no difference in recovery was observed between animals fed a PD or KD in SCI animals.

Preinjury, animals were in ketosis with mean ± SD ketone levels of 1.97 ± 1.25 compared with the PD-fed animals with ketone levels of 0.75 ± 0.241 (unpaired t test: t = 3.651, df = 21, p < 0.0015). Before sacrificing the animals, we obtained a blood sample and determined the ketone concentrations. The PD average was 0.750 mmol/L ± 0.259, while the KD concentration was 2.063 mmol/L ± 0.830 (unpaired t test: t = 4.752, df = 16, p < 0.0002).

Discussion

There is an urgent need to assess the potential of new therapeutic solutions, including diet-based interventions, to improve recovery following neurotrauma. Our study concluded there were minimal effects of the KD, a common form of metabolic therapy, on recovery from neural injuries (Streijger et al., 2013; Li et al., 2020). At baseline, before the injuries, we observed no significant differences in locomotor behaviors using the open field and ladder-run paradigms, or mechanosensory behaviors tested with von Frey hairs. Animals who were on the KD diet also had no differences in the levels of neuromodulators (dopamine, serotonin, and noradrenaline) in the spinal cord, although we did observe a decrease in levels of tyrosine and tryptophan. Similar reductions in tryptophan have been found in rats fed a KD (Heischmann et al., 2018). Following SNI-mimicking injury to the peripheral nervous system, an increase in mechanical allodynia (pain evoked by normally non-noxious stimulus) was observed in KD-fed animals compared with those fed a normal PD during the early phase of pain development. No other changes were detected in locomotor behaviors. In our SCI model, KD did not mitigate nociception or locomotor disability following thoracic spinal cord hemisection. Altogether, our data suggest that KD is not a suitable therapy for improving disability after peripheral or spinal cord injuries affecting the hindlimb.

This study was conceived on the premise that KD contributes to the reprogramming of cellular metabolism, thus modulating processes related to disorders of the CNS, including aberrant neuronal activity, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration (Cullingford, 2004). The KD replaces glucose with ketone bodies as the source for generating high-energy molecules, including ATP. It has been reported that by switching to ketone bodies, cellular energy production becomes more efficient (Ruskin and Masino, 2012). We hypothesized that this change in cellular metabolism would regulate cellular processes consequential to nerve injuries. Importantly, pain and motor deficits resulting from nerve injuries share similar cellular mechanisms. Immediately after a nerve is injured, neurodegeneration occurs followed by robust inflammatory processes, which aid the removal of cellular debris and subsequent sprouting of neural fibers (Benowitz and Popovich, 2011). These processes require precise temporal and spatial signaling of a plethora of trophic factors, relying on receptor binding on efferent neuronal targets for successful circuit remodeling (Hermann and Chopp, 2012). Importantly, errors in these intricate processes would result in aberrant neuronal function, thereby perpetuating motor deficits and pain following nerve injuries (Kohama et al., 2000; Hains et al., 2005). Often, these changes can occur quickly, for example leading to the hyperexcitability of neurons within 24 h of peripheral nerve injury (Iwata et al., 1999).

There are other reports which elucidated the molecular underpinnings in the benefits of KD. In a murine model of kainic acid-induced seizures, KD activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, which suppressed the expression of proinflammatory tumor necrosis factor-α and cyclooxygenase-2 (Jeong et al., 2011). Using the progressive genetic model of Alzheimer’s disease (APP/V7171 mutation), mice on the KD had overall lower levels of amyloid-β (Van der Auwera et al., 2005), a neurotoxin that on accumulation forms plaques and leads to cellular death (Mark et al., 1995). However, the same study also reported that KD did not alter behavioural outcomes including object recognition. Another study also found no improvements in memory functions in the APP/V7171 mutation model after a KD diet (Van der Auwera et al., 2005). An older study, using a different epileptic model (bicuculline-induced seizures) also found the effect of KD to be age dependent: KD initiated at postnatal day 16 protected animals against the tonic-extensor phase of bicuculline-induced seizures, whereas these effects were diminished if KD was initiated at postnatal day 26 (Uhlemann and Neims, 1972).

Our current study showed no overall improvements in nerve injury-induced sensorimotor deficits after KD, which is in contrast to other published observations. Rats fed a KD for 3–4 weeks showed reduced thermal hyperalgesia in a model of complete Freund’s adjuvant-induced chronic inflammation (Ruskin et al., 2009). In a murine model of obesity and prediabetes, the development of mechanical allodynia and loss of peripheral axonal termination was not observed in KD-fed animals, suggesting a neuroprotective mechanism (Cooper et al., 2018). Despite differences in an animal model of choice and testing modality, one experimental concern could be the duration of testing, as the pathogenesis of pain and motor deficits is dynamic and could differ between early and late phases of the injury (Kawasaki et al., 2008).

While no studies that we are aware of have addressed the effects of KD on thoracic SCI or peripheral nerve injury, there have been reports of the beneficial effects of KD on the recovery of reaching behavior in high cervical injuries in both mouse studies (Streijger et al., 2013) and human studies (Yarar-Fisher et al., 2018). These effects on reaching behavior in mice were confined to supination and grasping, suggesting regional effects on the cervical motor circuit. Other metrics showed a rapid increase in use behavior of the affected limb in KD cohorts. Importantly, our study concentrated on hindlimb, and connectivity onto the Central pattern generator (CPG) is different with large projections from the reticulospinal tract contributing to locomotor activity along with the inherent plasticity of the CPG itself (Girgis et al., 2007). Also, we used mice, whereas rats, which score lower on the BBB scale for motor recovery following SCI (Byrnes et al., 2010), were used in the forelimb study. To our knowledge, the time course of testing used in this study was comprehensive. The testing evaluated the most significant time points for motor recovery following injury, characterizing changes both before the onset of injury, and up to 4 weeks after. Most of the behavioral observations steadily plateaued before the end of the study. However, we do note that some of the metrics observed following SCI forelimb recovery occurred following 6 weeks of KD treatment. Surprisingly, none of these beneficial effects were observed if a KD was combined with other treatments (ibuprofen, ghrelin, and C16; Streijger et al., 2014). Future studies could extend the testing period beyond 4 weeks, and include measures of thermal sensitivity and neurite outgrowth to fully elucidate the effects of the KD. Our study used a hemisection model for SCI, producing a relatively mild injury and hindlimb-specific effects on ascending afferent projections. It is, therefore, possible that KD could be effective in a severe contusion model.

Another experimental consideration relates to the time required for animals to calibrate to the state of ketosis. Varying paradigms have been reported, ranging from introducing KD for 10 d to 4 weeks before the commencement of experiments (Uhlemann and Neims, 1972; Jeong et al., 2011). In our study, animals fasted for 12 h and behavioral testing commenced after 3 weeks of their being fed a KD. We also reported that animals were no longer in a state of established ketosis 1 h after the introduction of the normal pellet diet, indicating that the sustainability of ketosis is dependent on dedicated, timely feeding of the KD. In this work, we ensured that all animals were in states of ketosis before neural injury. However, when animals first enter ketosis, there are spikes in adenosine levels, which could have beneficial short-term effects (Yang et al., 2017). Future studies, with careful monitoring of the state of ketosis, could introduce the diet after nerve injuries to test the therapeutic potential of a KD in alleviating the maintenance of neuropathic pain and motor disability.

Mirroring this behavioral observation are our molecular findings showing no changes in the levels of neuromodulators after the commencement of KD. We chose to study the levels of dopamine, serotonin, and noradrenaline as they share common mechanisms underlying pain and motor functions (Hains et al., 2001; Scott et al., 2006; Rommelfanger et al., 2007). Their levels were determined in the spinal cord, which is a proxy measure of monoamine release at the terminals rather than cell bodies originating from the brain. Nonetheless, the pathophysiology of pain and motor disabilities is complex, and systemic administration of KD is likely to affect multiple downstream signaling pathways despite the monoamine systems. Of particular interest is the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factors (Keefe et al., 2017) and other inflammatory mediators, which may be modulated by KD (Vizuete et al., 2013) and have an established role in nerve repair (Zhang et al., 2000), plasticity (Seebach et al., 1999), and pain (Coull et al., 2005). Moreover, KD can decrease oxidative stress following traumatic brain injury (Greco et al., 2016). It was found by Streijger et al. (2013) that KD upregulated glucose transporter 1 and monocarboxylate transporter-1, and it is possible that this also occurred in our work. In addition, our study detected a decrease in the levels of tyrosine and tryptophan from KD mice, which are substrates that are important for the production of monoamines (Wurtman and Fernstrom, 1975). A plausible explanation for the mismatch in levels of precursors and monoamines is the bioavailability of converting enzymes, including tyrosine hydroxylase controlled by changes in diets (DeCastro et al., 2005). Alternatively, the diets used have different concentrations of the amino acids tryptophan and tyrosine with the KD diet (catalog #3666, Bio-Serv), having lower amounts of both (Table 1). To complete the findings, further investigation of the expression of other amino acid precursors and converting enzymes would be beneficial.

In summary, our study represents the initial exploration into the therapeutic potential of KD in nerve injury-related disease and showed that KD might not be suitable as a therapy for pain and motor recovery for the hindlimb. A translational approach was used to study the effects of pain and motor recovery from sciatic nerve injury and T10–T11 SCI. Our outcome measures showed a minimal effect of the diet and provided a mechanistic insight describing no change in levels of monoamine release at spinal terminals. Other studies could consider a different direction to further elucidate the effect of KD, including a later initiation of the diet or a refocus on a different disease phenotype.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We thank Michelle Tran, Gail Rauw, and James Wong for technical assistance on HPLC experiments.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • C.H.T.K. was funded by a Post doctoral fellowship Grant from Canadian Institutes of Health Research and by the Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI). K.A.M. was funded by a studentship from the Branch out Neurological Foundation and by the HBI. The research was funded by the Frank Leblanc Chair in Spinal Cord Injury Research. G.B.B. received funding from the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Adams MM, Hicks AL (2005) Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 43:577–586. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101757 pmid:15838527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Ahuja CS, Fehlings M (2016) Concise review: bridging the gap: novel neuroregenerative and neuroprotective strategies in spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Transl Med 5:914–924. doi:10.5966/sctm.2015-0381 pmid:27130222
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Azmitia EC (1999) Serotonin neurons, neuroplasticity, and homeostasis of neural tissue. Neuropsychopharmacology 21:33S–45S. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00022-6 pmid:10432487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Barañano KW, Hartman AL (2008) The ketogenic diet: uses in epilepsy and other neurologic illnesses. Curr Treat Options Neurol 10:410–419. doi:10.1007/s11940-008-0043-8 pmid:18990309
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Bareyre FM, Kerschensteiner M, Raineteau O, Mettenleiter TC, Weinmann O, Schwab ME (2004) The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat Neurosci 7:269–277. doi:10.1038/nn1195 pmid:14966523
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Benowitz LI, Popovich PG (2011) Inflammation and axon regeneration. Curr Opin Neurol 24:577–583. doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834c208d pmid:21968547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Brown A, Weaver LC (2012) The dark side of neuroplasticity. Exp Neurol 235:133–141. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.11.004 pmid:22116043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Burke D, Fullen BM, Stokes D, Lennon O (2017) Neuropathic pain prevalence following spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain 21:29–44. doi:10.1002/ejp.905 pmid:27341614
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Byrnes KR, Fricke ST, Faden AI (2010) Neuropathological differences between rats and mice after spinal cord injury. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:836–846. doi:10.1002/jmri.22323 pmid:20882614
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL (1994) Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods 53:55–63. doi:10.1016/0165-0270(94)90144-9 pmid:7990513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Cooper MA, Menta BW, Perez-Sanchez C, Jack MM, Khan ZW, Ryals JM, Winter M, Wright DE (2018) A ketogenic diet reduces metabolic syndrome-induced allodynia and promotes peripheral nerve growth in mice. Exp Neurol 306:149–157. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.05.011 pmid:29763602
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Coull JAM, Beggs S, Boudreau D, Boivin D, Tsuda M, Inoue K, Gravel C, Salter MW, De Koninck Y (2005) BDNF from microglia causes the shift in neuronal anion gradient underlying neuropathic pain. Nature 438:1017–1021. doi:10.1038/nature04223 pmid:16355225
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Cullingford TE (2004) The ketogenic diet; fatty acids, fatty acid-activated receptors and neurological disorders. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 70:253–264. doi:10.1016/j.plefa.2003.09.008 pmid:14769484
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    DeCastro M, Nankova BB, Shah P, Patel P, Mally PV, Mishra R, La Gamma EF (2005) Short chain fatty acids regulate tyrosine hydroxylase gene expression through a cAMP-dependent signaling pathway. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 142:28–38. doi:10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.09.002 pmid:16219387
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Finnerup NB, Baastrup C (2012) Spinal cord injury pain: mechanisms and management. Curr Pain Headache Rep 16:207–216. doi:10.1007/s11916-012-0259-x pmid:22392531
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Scott KP, Louis P (2015) Links between diet, gut microbiota composition and gut metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc 74:13–22. doi:10.1017/S0029665114001463 pmid:25268552
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Girgis J, Merrett D, Kirkland S, Metz GAS, Verge V, Fouad K (2007) Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery. Brain 130:2993–3003. doi:10.1093/brain/awm245 pmid:17928316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Greco T, Glenn TC, Hovda DA, Prins ML (2016) Ketogenic diet decreases oxidative stress and improves mitochondrial respiratory complex activity. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 36:1603–1613. doi:10.1177/0271678X15610584 pmid:26661201
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Hains BC, Johnson KM, McAdoo DJ, Eaton MJ, Hulsebosch CE (2001) Engraftment of serotonergic precursors enhances locomotor function and attenuates chronic central pain behavior following spinal hemisection injury in the rat. Exp Neurol 171:361–378. doi:10.1006/exnr.2001.7751 pmid:11573989
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Hains BC, Saab CY, Waxman SG (2005) Changes in electrophysiological properties and sodium channel Nav1.3 expression in thalamic neurons after spinal cord injury. Brain 128:2359–2371. doi:10.1093/brain/awh623 pmid:16109750
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Heischmann S, Gano LB, Quinn K, Liang L-P, Klepacki J, Christians U, Reisdorph N, Patel M (2018) Regulation of kynurenine metabolism by a ketogenic diet. J Lipid Res 59:958–966. doi:10.1194/jlr.M079251 pmid:29605816
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Hermann DM, Chopp M (2012) Promoting brain remodelling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation. Lancet Neurol 11:369–380. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70039-X pmid:22441198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Iwata K, Tashiro A, Tsuboi Y, Imai T, Sumino R, Morimoto T, Dubner R, Ren K (1999) Medullary dorsal horn neuronal activity in rats with persistent temporomandibular joint and perioral inflammation. J Neurophysiol 82:1244–1253. doi:10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1244
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Jensen MP, Kuehn CM, Amtmann D, Cardenas DD (2007) Symptom burden in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:638–645. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.002 pmid:17466734
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Jeong EA, Jeon BT, Shin HJ, Kim N, Lee DH, Kim HJ, Kang SS, Cho GJ, Choi WS, Roh GS (2011) Ketogenic diet-induced peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ activation decreases neuroinflammation in the mouse hippocampus after kainic acid-induced seizures. Exp Neurol 232:195–202. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.09.001 pmid:21939657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Kawasaki Y, Xu Z-Z, Wang X, Park JY, Zhuang Z-Y, Tan P-H, Gao Y-J, Roy K, Corfas G, Lo EH, Ji R-R (2008) Distinct roles of matrix metalloproteases in the early- and late-phase development of neuropathic pain. Nat Med 14:331–336. doi:10.1038/nm1723 pmid:18264108
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Keefe KM, Sheikh IS, Smith GM (2017) Targeting neurotrophins to specific populations of neurons: NGF, BDNF, and NT-3 and their relevance for treatment of spinal cord injury. Int J Mol Sci 18:548. doi:10.3390/ijms18030548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Kohama I, Ishikawa K, Kocsis JD (2000) Synaptic reorganization in the substantia gelatinosa after peripheral nerve neuroma formation: aberrant innervation of lamina II neurons by Aβ afferents. J Neurosci 20:1538–1549. pmid:10662843
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Li J, Liu Y, Liu H, Chen L, Li R (2020) Ketogenic diet potentiates electrical stimulation‐induced peripheral nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats. Mol Nutr Food Res 64:e1900535. doi:10.1002/mnfr.201900535 pmid:31914235
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Mark RJ, Hensley K, Butterfield DA, Mattson MP (1995) Amyloid β-peptide impairs ion-motive ATPase activities: evidence for a role in loss of neuronal Ca2+ homeostasis and cell death. J Neurosci 15:6239–6249. pmid:7666206
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Marzo A, Bai J, Otani S (2009) Neuroplasticity regulation by noradrenaline in mammalian brain. Curr Neuropharmacol 7:286–295. doi:10.2174/157015909790031193 pmid:20514208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Metz GA, Whishaw IQ (2009) The ladder rung walking task: a scoring system and its practical application. J Vis Exp 28:1204.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    Nitsche MA, Lampe C, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W (2006) Dopaminergic modulation of long-lasting direct current-induced cortical excitability changes in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 23:1651–1657. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04676.x pmid:16553629
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Parent M, Bush D, Rauw G, Master S, Vaccarino F, Baker G (2001) Analysis of amino acids and catecholamines, 5-hydroxytryptamine and their metabolites in brain areas in the rat using in vivo microdialysis. Methods 23:11–20. doi:10.1006/meth.2000.1102 pmid:11162146
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Rommelfanger KS, Edwards GL, Freeman KG, Liles LC, Miller GW, Weinshenker D (2007) Norepinephrine loss produces more profound motor deficits than MPTP treatment in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:13804–13809. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702753104 pmid:17702867
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Ruskin DN, Masino SA (2012) The nervous system and metabolic dysregulation: emerging evidence converges on ketogenic diet therapy. Front Neurosci 6:33. doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00033 pmid:22470316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Ruskin DN, Kawamura M, Masino SA (2009) Reduced pain and inflammation in juvenile and adult rats fed a ketogenic diet. PLoS One 4:e8349. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008349 pmid:20041135
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Scholz T, Krichevsky A, Sumarto A, Jaffurs D, Wirth GA, Paydar K, Evans GRD (2009) Peripheral nerve injuries: an international survey of current treatments and future perspectives. J Reconstr Microsurg 25:339–344. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1215529 pmid:19301234
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Scott DJ, Heitzeg MM, Koeppe RA, Stohler CS, Zubieta J-K (2006) Variations in the human pain stress experience mediated by ventral and dorsal basal ganglia dopamine activity. J Neurosci 26:10789–10795. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2577-06.2006 pmid:17050717
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Seebach BS, Arvanov V, Mendell LM (1999) Effects of BDNF and NT-3 on development of Ia/motoneuron functional connectivity in neonatal rats. J Neurophysiol 81:2398–2405. doi:10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2398 pmid:10322075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JTC, Wolfe DL (2012) The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 29:1548–1555. doi:10.1089/neu.2011.2226 pmid:22320160
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Smith J, Rho JM, Teskey GC (2016) Ketogenic diet restores aberrant cortical motor maps and excitation-to-inhibition imbalance in the BTBR mouse model of autism spectrum disorder. Behav Brain Res 304:67–70. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.015 pmid:26876011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Streijger F, Plunet WT, Lee JHT, Liu J, Lam CK, Park S, Hilton BJ, Fransen BL, Matheson KAJ, Assinck P, Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W (2013) Ketogenic diet improves forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rodents. PLoS One 8:e78765. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078765 pmid:24223849
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Streijger F, Lee JHT, Duncan GJ, Ng MTL, Assinck P, Bhatnagar T, Plunet WT, Tetzlaff W, Kwon BK (2014) Combinatorial treatment of acute spinal cord injury with ghrelin, ibuprofen, C16, and ketogenic diet does not result in improved histologic or functional outcome. J Neurosci Res 92:870–883. doi:10.1002/jnr.23372 pmid:24658967
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Teasell RW, Mehta S, Aubut J-A, Foulon B, Wolfe DL, Hsieh JTC, Townson AF, Short C (2010) A systematic review of pharmacologic treatments of pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:816–831. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Thompson EL, Broadbent J, Bertino MD, Staiger PK (2016) Do pain-related beliefs influence adherence to multidisciplinary rehabilitation? A systematic review. Clin J Pain 32:164–178. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000235 pmid:26735864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Turk DC, Rudy TE (1991) Neglected topics in the treatment of chronic pain patients—relapse, noncompliance, and adherence enhancement. Pain 44:5–28. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(91)90142-k pmid:2038489
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Uhlemann ER, Neims AH (1972) Anticonvulsant properties of the ketogenic diet in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 180:231–238. pmid:5010672
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Van der Auwera I, Van der Auwera I, Wera S, Van Leuven F, Henderson ST (2005) A ketogenic diet reduces amyloid beta 40 and 42 in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2:28. doi:10.1186/1743-7075-2-28 pmid:16229744
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    van Hecke O, Austin SK, Khan RA, Smith BH, Torrance N (2014) Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Pain 155:654–662. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.11.013 pmid:24291734
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Vizuete AF, de Souza DF, Guerra MC, Batassini C, Dutra MF, Bernardi C, Costa AP, Gonçalves C-A (2013) Brain changes in BDNF and S100B induced by ketogenic diets in Wistar rats. Life Sci 92:923–928. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2013.03.004 pmid:23557853
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Wurtman RJ, Fernstrom JD (1975) Control of brain monoamine synthesis by diet and plasma amino acids. Am J Clin Nutr 28:638–647. doi:10.1093/ajcn/28.6.638 pmid:1093382
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Yang Q, Guo M, Wang X, Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Ding H, Dong Q, Cui M (2017) Ischemic preconditioning with a ketogenic diet improves brain ischemic tolerance through increased extracellular adenosine levels and hypoxia-inducible factors. Brain Res 1667:11–18. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2017.04.010 pmid:28427869
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Yarar-Fisher C, Kulkarni A, Li J, Farley P, Renfro C, Aslam H, Bosarge P, Wilson L, Barnes S (2018) Evaluation of a ketogenic diet for improvement of neurological recovery in individuals with acute spinal cord injury: a pilot, randomized safety and feasibility trial. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 4:88. doi:10.1038/s41394-018-0121-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    Yudkoff M, Daikhin Y, Melø TM, Nissim I, Sonnewald U, Nissim I (2007) The ketogenic diet and brain metabolism of amino acids: relationship to the anticonvulsant effect. Annu Rev Nutr 27:415–430. doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093722 pmid:17444813
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Zhang J-Y, Luo X-G, Xian CJ, Liu Z-H, Zhou X-F (2000) Endogenous BDNF is required for myelination and regeneration of injured sciatic nerve in rodents. Eur J Neurosci 12:4171–4180. pmid:11122329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Eran Perlson, Tel Aviv University

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Dianna Willis, Isobel Scarisbrick.

In this manuscript, the authors investigate the extent to which a ketogenic diet can improve sensorimotor behavior follow either a CNS (T10-11 hemisection SCI) or a PNS (sciatic nerve spared nerve injury) injury. Previous studies in other SCI models, as well as brain injury and diseases, have suggested that a ketogenic diet may be neuroprotective and/or analgesic through several putative mechanism. This is the first study to look at its effect on hindlimb function following a thoracic level injury. The authors present data that the ketogenic diet had no beneficial effect on sensorimotor behavior in either injury paradigm, even though the diet was sufficient to increase ketone levels. The diet also had no effect on the spinal cord levels of monoamines, which given their role as neuromodulators of locomotion and nociception, might be expected to change if the diet was acting via this mechanism. Interestingly, there was decreased tryptophan and tyrosine in the spinal cords of KD mice. Overall, this is a well-written manuscript describing a potential therapeutic approach that has received considerable interest given its utility in other pathological conditions and the relative ease of administering. I think it is important to publish studies that do not support the hypothesis, especially given this level of interest as a potential therapeutic approach.

However, mechanistic explanations for why results differ from other findings in the SCI field are not well addressed and there are still questions regarding timing of treatment, duration of treatment, outcome measures, etc that make it difficult to conclusively conclude that this is not a viable therapeutic for this type/location of injury.

Major Comments:

1. Could the changes in tryptophan and tyrosine simply be due to the differences in diet composition? It would be helpful to comment on the amounts of these in each of the diets. Wouldn’t you expect to see the opposite based on the components of a ketogenic diet? Is the tryptophan and tyrosine depletion a consequence of alterations in metabolic activity?

2. Body weights were not significantly lower by diet alone, yet there was a significant effect of the interaction (diet x time) in the mixed-effect analysis. Since time here is influenced by the surgery status, this should be commented on.

3. Why might mechanical allodynia be increased in the KD mice? Increased inflammation? Is it a sign of a more intact sensory systems or altered neuronal activity?

4. Although the authors do mention that forelimb recovery was improved in rodent models of SCI, they did not mention human pilot studies that show improved motor outcomes in upper extremities (i.e. Yarar-Fisher et al, Spinal Cord Ser Cases, 2018).

5. The authors have done an excellent job showing that functional outcomes are not improved by KD. However, since they only looked at behavior and a single tissue endpoint, it complicates the interpretation of the results being an assumption that no beneficial or detrimental effects are occurring at the tissue level (i.e. on inflammation, oxidative stress, metabolic changes). Do authors suggest that no underlying mechanism is changed, thus no functional changes? For example, inflammation could lead to increased tryptophan catabolism, yet no inflammation markers are looked at. This should be addressed.

6. It is acknowledged that the type of injury/location is different from other reported studies, but are the expected underlying mechanisms for cited literature simply not affected by KD in this model? If so, why might this region of spinal cord not have the beneficial effect when compared to cervical? It is interesting that the SCI and peripheral nerve would both not show changes here, yet another SCI model showed benefit. Would this indicate that the diet itself (both are ketogenic but might have a differences in composition), rather than anatomical location, could have an effect?

7. Overall, it looks like statistical methods are described appropriately, but why are there many more PD versus KD group mice? How were the animals assigned to the diet groups?

8. The last sentence in the Abstract seems to directly contradict the results shown. “This suggests that ketogenic diets need to be assessed based on the type and location of neurotrauma” comes directly after discussing that the diet had no effect in either the T10-11 injury or the SNI injury. Maybe you mean this statement in comparison to prior studies, but this is confusing and needs to be better explained if that is the point you are trying to make.

9. The authors talk in the discussion about the timescale of the post-injury behavior in their study vs. the published cervical study. In looking at those data, pellet reaching was not significant until at least 6 weeks, although cylinder reaching was at 2 weeks. How convinced are the authors that they looked out late enough, or that they used the best behavioral outcomes, to see any potential effect. Have they considered additional outcome measures, such as CatWalk, where you can get more detailed aspects of locomotion such as gait pattern and sensory-motor control? I’m not so sure that the difference in effect vs. non-effective in the prior published study and this study is largely due to injury type/location.

10. The heading “The ketogenic diet had a moderate effect on sensorimotor recovery in the context of peripheral nerve injury” is not consistent with the data shown. There is no improvement in recovery in either model. This is misleading.

11. Figure 2 demonstrates no changes in monoamines. Where any other measures of “plasticity” measured (such as HIF, BDNF, etc)

Minor Comments:

1. Can you provide additional details on randomization? Was baseline behavior done prior to diet randomization, so that groups were balanced based on baseline behavior?

2. In Figure 3I, the authors talk about a “trend”. The difference is not significant.

3. Period instead of comma on page 12, first paragraph, between “behavioral outcomes” and “object recognition"

4. Page 12, second paragraph. Comma after “peripheral nerve injury”.

View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 4
July/August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effects of a Ketogenic Diet on Sensorimotor Function in a Thoracolumbar Mouse Spinal Cord Injury Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The Effects of a Ketogenic Diet on Sensorimotor Function in a Thoracolumbar Mouse Spinal Cord Injury Model
Kyle A. Mayr, Charlie H.T. Kwok, Shane E.A. Eaton, Glen B. Baker, Patrick J. Whelan
eNeuro 17 July 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0178-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0178-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
The Effects of a Ketogenic Diet on Sensorimotor Function in a Thoracolumbar Mouse Spinal Cord Injury Model
Kyle A. Mayr, Charlie H.T. Kwok, Shane E.A. Eaton, Glen B. Baker, Patrick J. Whelan
eNeuro 17 July 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0178-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0178-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • function
  • ketogenic diet
  • Plasticity
  • spinal cord injury
  • therapies

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Negative Results

  • Evaluation of the HPA Axis’ Response to Pharmacological Challenges in Experimental and Clinical Early-Life Stress-Associated Depression
  • Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase γ Is Not a Predominant Regulator of ATP-Dependent Directed Microglial Process Motility or Experience-Dependent Ocular Dominance Plasticity
  • GSK3β Impairs KIF1A Transport in a Cellular Model of Alzheimer’s Disease but Does Not Regulate Motor Motility at S402
Show more Research Article: Negative Results

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Arginine Vasopressin-Containing Neurons of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Project to CSF
  • An Atoh1 CRE knock-in mouse labels motor neurons involved in fine motor control
  • Neural correlates of vocal auditory feedback processing: Unique insights from electrocorticography recordings in a human cochlear implant user
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.