Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts
  • Log out

eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Methods/New Tools, Disorders of the Nervous System

Snca-GFP Knock-In Mice Reflect Patterns of Endogenous Expression and Pathological Seeding

Anna Caputo, Yuling Liang, Tobias D. Raabe, Angela Lo, Mian Horvath, Bin Zhang, Hannah J. Brown, Anna Stieber and Kelvin C. Luk
eNeuro 11 August 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0007-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0007-20.2020
Anna Caputo
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuling Liang
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias D. Raabe
2Department of Medicine, Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Lo
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mian Horvath
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bin Zhang
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah J. Brown
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Stieber
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelvin C. Luk
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kelvin C. Luk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

α-Synuclein (aSyn) participates in synaptic vesicle trafficking and synaptic transmission but its misfolding is also strongly implicated in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other neurodegenerative synucleinopathies in which misfolded aSyn accumulates in different regions of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Although increased aSyn expression levels or altered aggregation propensities likely underlie familial PD with SNCA amplification or mutations, the majority of synucleinopathies arise sporadically, indicating that disease can develop under normal levels of wild-type (wt) aSyn. We report here the development and characterization of a mouse line expressing an aSyn-green fluorescence protein (GFP) fusion protein under the control of native Snca regulatory elements. Regional and subcellular localization of the aSyn-GFP fusion protein in brains and peripheral tissues of knock-in (KI) mice are indistinguishable from that of wt littermates. Importantly, similar to wt aSyn, aSyn-GFP disperses from synaptic vesicles on membrane depolarization, indicating that the tag does not alter normal aSyn dynamics at synapses. In addition, intracerebral injection of aSyn pre-formed fibrils into KI mice induced the formation of aSyn-GFP inclusions with a distribution pattern similar to that observed in wt mice, albeit with attenuated kinetics because of the GFP-tag. We anticipate that this new mouse model will facilitate in vitro and in vivo studies requiring in situ detection of endogenous aSyn, thereby providing new insights into aSyn function in health and disease.

  • α-synuclein
  • green fluorescent protein
  • knock-in mouse
  • Lewy pathology
  • preformed fibrils

Significance Statement

α-Synuclein (aSyn) participates in synaptic vesicle function and represents a major component of the Lewy pathology found in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and related neurodegenerative diseases. The function of aSyn and the sequence of events leading to its aggregation and neurotoxicity are not fully understood. Here, we present a new mouse model in which enhanced green fluorescence protein (GFP) was knocked in at the C terminus of the Snca gene. The resulting fusion protein shows identical expression and localization to that of wild-type (wt) animals, is functional, and is incorporated into pathologic aggregates in vitro and in vivo. This new tool allows for monitoring aSyn under a variety of physiological and pathologic conditions, and may uncover additional insights into its function and dysfunction.

Introduction

α-Synuclein (aSyn) is a protein prominently expressed in neurons and enriched at presynapses (Maroteaux et al., 1988). Although its precise functions are not fully understood, collective evidence suggests that aSyn regulates synaptic vesicle trafficking and fusion (Nemani et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2014; Logan et al., 2017; Burré et al., 2018). aSyn also constitutes the major component of Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, intraneuronal inclusions characteristic of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and a group of neurodegenerative diseases known as synucleinopathies (Burré et al., 2018; Bendor et al., 2013; Goedert et al., 2013). While mutations or amplification of the aSyn gene can lead to familial PD (Polymeropoulos et al., 1997; Krüger et al., 1998; Singleton et al., 2003; Zarranz et al., 2004; Koros et al., 2017; Schneider and Alcalay, 2017), the majority of PD cases are sporadic and develop in the presence of normal levels of wild-type (wt) aSyn.

Several aSyn animal models have been generated to study aSyn function and pathobiology (Visanji et al., 2016). Accumulation of aggregated aSyn, loss of dopaminergic neurons, and behavioral impairments have been reported in multiple lines. However, the majority of these models rely on the overexpression of human aSyn, often bearing disease-associated mutations, under the control of a heterologous (i.e., non-Snca) promoter, and in the presence of endogenous mouse aSyn expression (Masliah et al., 2000; van der Putten et al., 2000; Kahle et al., 2001; Matsuoka et al., 2001; Giasson et al., 2002; Tofaris et al., 2006; Emmer et al., 2011). These features potentially confound data interpretation, especially in relation to normal aSyn function and its role in sporadic PD. These models also poorly recapitulate the prion-like propagation of pathologic aSyn suggested by the staged distribution of aSyn deposits in diseased human brains (Braak et al., 2003; Alafuzoff et al., 2009; Beach et al., 2009). Recent studies demonstrating that aSyn pathology formation and spread can be initiated in wt mice following inoculation of recombinant aSyn preformed fibrils (PFFs; Luk et al., 2012; Masuda-Suzukake et al., 2014; Rey et al., 2018) or human brain derived aSyn aggregates (Masuda-Suzukake et al., 2013; Recasens et al., 2014; Peng et al., 2018) further support this hypothesis, thus enabling the modeling of these processes without aSyn ectopic expression. Exposure to PFFs also induces aSyn pathology in primary neurons, allowing for cellular and molecular characterizations (Volpicelli-Daley et al., 2011). These models provide additional structural and temporal resolution for observing aSyn pathogenesis, yet they do not allow monitoring aSyn in real time. To this aim, two mouse models overexpressing human aSyn tagged with green fluorescence protein (GFP) have been reported (Rockenstein et al., 2005; Hansen et al., 2013). Transient overexpression of aSyn-GFP has also been used in primary neurons (McLean et al., 2001; Fortin et al., 2005; Volpicelli-Daley et al., 2014a). These models have provided valuable insights about the trafficking of aSyn at synapses (Fortin et al., 2005), aSyn aggregate formation and development (Unni et al., 2010; Osterberg et al., 2015), and their link to synaptic/axonal dysfunction (Scott et al., 2010; Volpicelli-Daley et al., 2014a) and cell death (Osterberg et al., 2015).

Nonetheless, aSyn is differentially expressed in specific neuron subtypes (Hawrylycz et al., 2012; Uhlén et al., 2015; Taguchi et al., 2016), and its function and propensity to aggregate are dependent on expression levels (Nemani et al., 2010; Scott and Roy, 2012; Logan et al., 2017; Luna et al., 2018), thus making the use of the endogenous promoter highly desirable. We therefore generated a mouse in which GFP was knocked in at the C terminus of the endogenous Snca gene. The resulting mouse displays aSyn-GFP expression at wt levels, primarily in neurons and with the same distribution as wt aSyn. Moreover, the fusion-protein localizes correctly to synaptic vesicle and participates in the synaptic vesicle cycle. Importantly, aSyn-GFP is incorporated in Lewy-like pathology seeded by exposure to PFFs. We anticipate that this new tool will allow for further studies aimed at better understanding aSyn physiology and pathobiology.

Materials and Methods

Animals

All housing, breeding, and procedures were performed according to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals and approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were anesthetized with a mix of 100 mg/kg ketamine, 10 mg/kg xylazine, and 0.5 mg/kg acepromazine before performing transcardiac perfusion with PBS + heparin (2 USP/ml). The Snca-GFP KI line was created by homologous recombination: a synthetic mouse Snca exon 6 with a short linker (the primary sequence around the linker being …EPEA-KL-MVSKG…) was inserted directly after the last amino acid of the mouse Snca coding sequence, followed by the enhanced GFP coding sequence and the remainder of the SNCA 3’UTR (Fig. 1A). A synthetic DNA construct (Blueheron Inc.) consisting of ∼200 nt of the genomic Snca sequences upstream of exon 6 and all of exon 6 (with the above linker and eGFP sequence inserted directly after the C terminus of Snca) was cloned directly downstream of the floxed Neomycine (Neo) cassette of PL452 (NCI). A ∼500-nt-long Snca upstream arm of homology was added upstream of the Neo cassette. This construct was introduced by BAC recombineering into pL253 (NCI) harboring ∼12 kB of the genomic SNCA region containing at its center SNCA exon 6. The resulting targeting vector contained a 14,183-nt-long Snca allele with integrated floxed Neo cassette as well as Snca exon 6 containing KL–eGFP downstream of the Snca protein. The targeting vector was linearized with NotI and introduced into V6.5 ES cells by electroporation. After geneticin selection ES clones were screened by Southern blotting (HindIII digestion) and five positive clones were found and further validated by a second round of Southern blotting (PvuII digestion) using a different probe (Fig. 1A). The positive clones generated a wt ∼12 kB and a mutant ∼9kB PvuII fragment. Positive clones were subjected to chromosome counting. Clone 2B9, which had the correct number of chromosomes, was injected into C57/B6 mouse blastocysts. Heterozygous and homozygous mice were obtained and confirmed by PCR (Table 1) using primers encompassing the fusion region (exon 6) that amplify a longer fragment when the GFP sequence is present (Fig. 1A,B) and resulted in phenotypically normal mice until 24 months of age. No effect on survival was observed (data not shown). Snca-GFP mice were bred with a Cre-recombinase expressing line (The Jackson Laboratory stock 006054) to remove the Neo cassette. Animals negative for the Neo gene were identified by PCR (Table 1) and selected for subsequent breeding (Fig. 1B), although no differences were observed between Neo positive and Neo negative or mice. C57BL/6J were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (JAX 000664) and CD1 mice from Charles River (Strain 022). Snca−/− mice (Abeliovich et al., 2000) were maintained on a B6C3H background. Snca-GFP mice will be made available through The Jackson Laboratory Repository (Stock No. 035412).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Design and validation of Snca-GFP KI mouse. A, The GFP sequence was knocked in (KI) at the C-terminal end (exon 6; E6) of the Snca gene, resulting in the expression of aSyn-GFP under the endogenous regulatory elements (for additional details, see Materials and Methods). Right panel, Southern blot analysis of geneticin-resistant ES cells electroporated with the targeting vector in A following enzymatic digestion with the restriction enzyme PvuII. Note the additional PvuII restriction site introduced by the integration of the targeting vector. B, PCR amplification of wt and Snca-GFP exon 6 from heterozygous and homozygous mice. Exon 6 comprises the fusion region. C, Brains from heterozygous and homozygous Snca-GFP mice fluoresce when illuminated under blue light. D, Quantification of aSyn mRNA levels in brain homogenates of heterozygous or homozygous KI mice compared with wt littermates. Data are expressed as fold change of aSyn normalized to actin. Mean and SD values are shown (N = 5–6 per condition). No statistically significant difference was found between groups using one-way ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison test). E, Levels of aSyn and aSyn-GFP in brain homogenate from wt, heterozygous, and homozygous mice. Graphs show quantification of the immunoblot data expressed as intensities of aSyn or aSyn-GFP (detected using Syn9027) normalized to GAPDH levels. Complete blot and standards are shown in Extended Data Figures 1-1, 1-2, 1-3. Mean and SEM values shown (N = 2–4 per group).

Antibodies

All antibodies used in this study are outlined in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Primer, Sequence, Use

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Antibodies used in this study

Reagents and chemicals

All reagents were purchased from ThermoFisher and chemicals purchased from Sigma unless otherwise indicated.

Recombinant aSyn monomers and PFFs

Recombinant mouse aSyn and aSyn-GFP were produced as previously described (Luk et al., 2012; Karpowicz et al., 2017) . In brief, plasmids encoding the two proteins were introduced in Escherichia coli using heat shock and proteins were purified following lysis using size exclusion and anion exchange chromatography. Purified protein (monomer) was concentrated to 5 mg/ml for aSyn wt and 15 mg/ml for aSyn-GFP (360 μm) and kept frozen until use. Recombinant PFFs (mouse wt aSyn) were produced by shaking 500 μl of recombinant aSyn monomer (5 mg/ml, 360 μm) at 37° C for 7 d. Fibril formation was confirmed by sedimentation assay (see Sedimentation assay section). Right before their use, PFFs are diluted in PBS and sonicated for 10 cycles (30 s ON, 30 s OFF, high intensity) in a bath sonicator at 10°C (BioRuptor; Diagenode).

Electron microscopy

Wt aSyn (2.5 mg/ml, 180 μm), aSyn-GFP (7.5 mg/ml, 180 μm), or wt aSyn + aSyn-GFP (assembled as 1:1 monomer mixture) were diluted in PBS, absorbed onto Formvar/carbon film-coated copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences), washed twice with water, and negatively stained with 0.4–2% uranyl acetate. Grids were visualized with a Jeol 1010 transmission electron microscope (Peabody).

Sedimentation assay

Monomers were thawed and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min at room temperature (RT). They were then diluted to 2.5 (wt aSyn, 180 μm) and 7.5 mg/ml (aSyn-GFP, 180 μm) in PBS; 100 μl of aSyn, aSyn-GFP, or aSyn + aSyn-GFP (1:1) was aliquoted in Eppendorf tubes and shaken at 1000 rpm at 37°C for 24 h; 6 μl of each reaction was collected at the indicated time points, diluted in 60 μl of PBS, and layered on a 25% sucrose cushion before undergoing ultracentrifugation (30 min at 100,000 × g). Supernatant and pellet fractions were separated. Pellets were resuspended in 120 μl of 12.5% sucrose; 25 μl of 5× SDS sample buffer were added to each tube, and 30 μl was loaded on 15% acrylamide gels for SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins were then stained with Coomassie Blue ON and destained with 10% isopropanol, 10% acetic acid, and water before image acquisition with an infrared scanner (LiCor Odyssey).

Sequential extraction

Neurons were washed twice with PBS and lysed in TBS (50 mm TRIS and 150 mm NaCl; pH 7.6) + 1% Triton X-100 (TX-100). Lysates were sonicated (10 cycles, 1 s ON, 30 s OFF, medium intensity in a bath sonicator at 10°C (BioRuptor; Diagenode) and then rotated at 4°C for 20 min. Lysates were then spun at 100,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C, supernatants were removed and labeled as TX-100 soluble fraction. The pellet was washed once with 1% TX-100 TBS, sonicated, and ultracentrifuged. Supernatants were discarded and pellets dissolved in 1/10 volume of TBS, 2% SDS, sonicated, and ultracentrifuged. Supernatants were collected as SDS soluble fraction and pellets were discarded. Protein content was measured by BCA in the TX-100 soluble fraction. Equal amount of total proteins from TX-100 soluble fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE (4–20% gradient gel). An equal volume of the SDS soluble fraction was loaded alongside. Proteins were detected by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies.

Immunofluorescence

Primary neurons

Neurons were fixed at the indicated Days in vitro (DIV) with warm 4% paraformaldehyde containing 4% sucrose with or without 1% TX-100 for 15 min at RT. Cells were permeabilized and non-specific binding sites blocked using PBS containing 0.1% TX-100, 3% BSA, 3% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 20 min. Primary antibodies were added to cells for 1 h, followed by three washes with PBS and 1-h incubation with the appropriate secondary antibody (1:1000). Cells were washed three times with PBS, once in water and mounted using Fluoromount-G.

Forty-micrometer brain sections and intestinal whole mounts

Tissues (brain and intestines) were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldheyde. Brain sections were cut using a compresstome (Precisionary) and intestine samples were opened along the mesenteric border and pinned down before fixation. Sections were permeabilized and blocked in PBS containing 10% FBS, 3% BSA, 0.5% TX-100 for 1 h at RT, incubated with primary antibodies ON at RT, washed three times with PBS, incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h at RT, washed, and mounted using Fluoromount-G (brain sections) or 1:1 PBS/glycerol (intestine).

Six-micrometer sections

Sections were produced and treated as described in the immuonohystochemistry section with the modification that after the ON incubation with primary antibodies, sections were incubated with a fluorescently labeled secondary antibody for 2 h at RT, and mounted using fluoromount-G.

Images were captured on a Nikon Ds-Qi1Mc digital camera attached to a Nikon Eclipse Ni microscope (6-µm sections), a Leica Confocal SP8 for colocalization studies (primary neurons and 40-µm sections), a PerkinElmer Lamina Scanner (full 40-µm sections), or using the InCell Analyzer 2200 (GE Healthcare) when using 96-well plates). Analysis was performed using Fiji or Developer software (GE Healthcare, 96-well plates).

Immunohistochemistry

PBS-perfused mouse brains were post fixed in ethanol (70% in 150 mm NaCl) ON at 4°C, cut in 3-mm slabs, and embedded in paraffin. Tissue was then sectioned at 6 µm using a microtome and applied on glass slides. Before staining, sections were de-paraffinized, rehydrated (xylene, 95%, 90%, and 75% ethanol) and treated with 5% hydrogen peroxide (in methanol). Sections were blocked in TBS containing 3% FBS and 2% BSA for 1 h at RT, incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C ON, with biotinylated secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT (Vector Laboratories), horse radish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin for 1 h at RT (Vector Laboratories), and signal was revealed using DAB peroxidase substrate products (dark brown, Vector Laboratories). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin for 1 min and mounted using Cytoseal Mounting Media. Images were captured on a Nikon Ds-Qi1Mc digital camera attached to a Nikon Eclipse Ni microscope or using a Lamina Scanner (PerkinElmer; 20× objective).

Synaptic vesicle cycling

Hippocampal neurons were plated on MatTek dishes and kept in culture for 18–21 d. Cells were then incubated in Krebs Ringer HEPES buffer (5 mm KCl, 140 mm NaCl, 10 mm HEPES, 10 mm glucose, 2.6 mm CaCl2, and 1.3 mm MgCl2) for 15 min before starting the imaging sessions. Images were acquired with a Leica microscope and a 40× air objective. Cells were imaged (every 3–5 s) in KRH solution for 2–3 min to establish a baseline signal. The media was then switched to high potassium (HK; 90 mm KCl, 55 mm NaCl, 10 mm HEPES, 10 mm glucose, 2.6 mm CaCl2, and 1.3 mm MgCl2) or KRH solution for 2 min. Individual vesicles were fragmented using ImageJ/FIJI and intensities before and after stimulation were determined as ratios after subtracting background signal and adjusting for image drift (Lazarenko et al., 2018).

For fixed samples, cells on coverslips were washed and incubated in KHR for 15 min at RT and then either fixed immediately before treatment, incubated with HK for 2 min before fixation (HK), or washed for an additional 15 min using HRK before fixation (HK + 15-min recovery). Cells were then processed for immunostaining as described above.

Western blotting

Cells were lysed in lyses buffer (0.5% TX-100, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 10 mm TRIS, and 100 mm NaCl; pH 8.0) with phosphatase and protease inhibitors. Nuclei and debris were removed by centrifugation (5 min at 1000 × g). Total protein content was determined by BCA, and equal amounts of total protein were separated on 4–20% gradient gels. Proteins were then transferred to 0.22-µm nitrocellulose membranes (1 h at 100 V at 4°C). Membranes were blocked in 7.5% BSA and incubated with the indicated primary antibodies ON followed by appropriate secondary antibodies (LiCor) for 1 h at RT. Image acquisition was performed using a LiCor Scanner and image analysis performed using ImageJ/FIJI (NIH).

Primary neurons and PFF transduction

Primary hippocampal neurons were derived from P0-P2 wt or Snca-GFP pups or from CD1 E16–E18 embryos (Extended Data Fig. 6-2 only). Postnatal hippocampi were dissected in MEM 10 mm HEPES, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, digested with 1 mg/ml Papain for 30 min, and dissociated with a 1-ml tip in MEM 10% FBS, 2 mm GlutaMax, sucrose, 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were centrifuged at 1000 RPM for 4 min, resuspended in MEM, 2% B27, 2 mm GlutaMax, 0.5% penicillin/streptomycin, and plated at the density of 4.5 × 104/cm2. Embryonic hippocampi were processed as previously described (Volpicelli-Daley et al., 2014b).

Extended Data Figure 1-1

Full 9027 Western blotting for Figure 1E. Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

Extended Data Figure 1-2

Coomassie staining (left) and Western blotting with the anti-aSyn antibody (Syn9027, right) of different amounts of recombinant mouse aSyn and aSyn-GFP. Download Figure 1-2, TIF file.

Extended Data Figure 1-3

Western blotting (Syn9027) of brain homogenates of the indicated genotype loaded along with the indicated amount of recombinant aSyn and aSyn-GFP proteins. Download Figure 1-3, TIF file.

PFF transduction was conducted at 10 DIV by adding 2 μg/ml (96-well plate and coverslips) or 10 μg/ml (biochemistry) of PFFs diluted in PBS and sonicated with a BioRuptor (Diagenode) bath sonicator for 10 cycles of 30 s ON, 30 s OFF, high setting. Cells were processed 7 or 14 d post-transduction (DPT).

Live imaging

Sncawt/GFP neurons were cultured on MatTek dishes for 10 d, transduced with 2 µg of wt PFFs, and incubated for five additional days. Neurons were then transferred to the imaging chamber (5% CO2, 37°C) and allowed to equilibrate for 30 min. Five fields of view were selected and images were taken every 15 min using a Leica DMI 6000 microscope.

Intracerebral injection of PFFs

A total of 2.5 μl of 2 mg/ml of sonicated mouse wt PFFs were stereotaxically injected in the hippocampus (coordinates: −2.5 mm relative to bregma; 2 mm from midline; 2.4 mm beneath the skull; Fig. 8) of male mice of the indicated genotype (two to four months of age, three mice/genotype; Zhang et al., 2019). Mice were perfused 30 d postsurgery. Additionally, as shown in Extended Data Figures 8-1, 8-2, PFFs were stereotaxically injected into the ventral striatum (AP: +0.2 mm bregma, lateral: 2.0 mm from midline, depth: 3.6 mm beneath the dura), dorsal striatum (AP: +0.2 mm, lateral: 2.0 mm, depth: 2.6 mm), and overlaying cortex (AP: +0.2 mm, lateral: 2.0 mm, depth: 0.8 mm) of mice (females) of the indicated genotype and mice were perfused at 30 (one mouse/genotype; data not shown) or 90 d postinjection (one mouse/genotype).

RT-PCR

Mice were perfused, brain removed in conditions that minimize RNA degradation, and half hemispheres were frozen for further processing. Frozen tissue was thawed and immediately homogenized in 2 ml of RTL buffer + 2 mm DTT (QIAGEN). mRNA was extracted from 300 μl of homogenate using the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN) according to manufacturer’s instructions; 200–800 μg of mRNA were converted to single strand cDNA with SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using random hexamers and the protocol detailed by the vendor. Brain derived cDNA and primers targeting mouse aSyn (Table 1) were used in Syber Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific) real-time PCR reactions monitored by a 7500 Fast Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Actin and SNAP 25 were used as internal controls (Table 1). Data are expressed as fold change over the wt genotype.

Measurements of GFP signal in mouse blood

Total blood was collected in EDTA containing tubes by cardiac puncture in deep terminal anesthesia and right before transcardial perfusion (see specific section); 25 μl of blood were lysed by addition of 225 μl of lysis buffer, and 5 μl of lysate were diluted in 190 μl of water and analyzed for fluorescence using a spectrophotometer (excitation: 488 nm; emission: 530 nm).

Experimental designs and statistical analysis

Details for each experiment and statistical analysis are described in the figure legends. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (v7) or GraphPad Prism (v8 for Fig. 7C).

Results

Snca-GFP knock-in (KI) mice express wt levels of aSyn-GFP fusion protein

We generated a novel mouse line that genetically encodes fluorescent aSyn by using homologous recombination to insert the cDNA for enhanced-GFP into the Snca locus of murine embryonic stem cells (Fig. 1A; see also Materials and Methods). The construct was targeted to the 3′ end of exon 6 while keeping the surrounding endogenous regulatory elements intact. The modified Snca-GFP gene was predicted to transcribe a fusion protein consisting of wt murine aSyn with a C-terminal GFP-tag. Embryonic stem cells containing the recombined construct following electroporation were confirmed by Southern blot analysis (Fig. 1A, right panel), and a validated clone (1B6) was implanted in C57BL/6 blastocysts to yield founder lines. Two founder mouse lines were derived, and offspring with normal karyotypes were further expanded by breeding out onto a C57BL/6 background. PCR genotyping with primers targeting exon-intron boundaries revealed mice with either wt, heterozygous (Sncawt/GFP), or homozygous (SncaGFP/GFP) KI genotypes (Fig. 1B). Both KI genotypes were fertile and did not show detectable differences in lifespan nor any overt behavioral defects up to two years of age.

Upon illumination with blue light, brains and spinal cords from Sncawt/GFP and SncaGFP/GFP mice fluoresced brightly, in line with expression of the aSyn-GFP fusion protein in tissues where aSyn is normally abundant (Fig. 1C). Quantification of aSyn mRNA by RT-PCR showed that total transcript levels did not differ between KI and wt mice (Fig. 1D). We further confirmed that this represented the expression of an intact aSyn-GFP fusion protein by subjecting brain homogenates from wt and KI mice to immunoblot analysis. Probing with antibodies against aSyn and GFP showed a 45-kDa product corresponding to the predicted molecular weight of aSyn-GFP in SncaGFP/GFP and Sncawt/GFP littermates that was absent from wt controls (Fig. 1E). Furthermore, no significant cleavage products were detected by either antibody. However, a monoclonal antibody to aSyn (Syn9027; Fig. 1E; Extended Data Figs. 1-1, 1-2, 1-3) and a rabbit polyclonal antibody (SNL1; data not shown) both showed stronger reactivity for aSyn-GFP relative to the untagged form by immunoblot. Nonetheless, Snca wt/GFP mice expressed both aSyn-GFP and untagged aSyn at ∼50% of the amount of aSyn seen in Snca GFP/GFP and wt mice, respectively (Fig. 1E, lower panel). These results indicate that Snca-GFP mice express physiological levels of an aSyn-GFP fusion protein with minimal disruption of endogenous mouse aSyn mRNA and protein levels.

Regional and subcellular localization of aSyn-GFP in Snca-GFP mice is identical to wt animals

Since the endogenous promoter and regulatory elements remain unmodified in Snca-GFP mice, we predicted that the regional and subcellular distribution of aSyn-GFP would be comparable between wt and both KI genotypes. Examination of native GFP fluorescence in 40-µm-thick brain and spinal cord sections revealed abundant aSyn-GFP expression particularly in the hippocampus, substantia nigra, striatum, cerebral cortex, globus pallidus, thalamus, and olfactory bulb (Fig. 2A), mirroring the endogenous pattern previously reported for C57BL/6 mice (Taguchi et al., 2016). Detection by immunofluorescence also showed no obvious differences in regional aSyn distribution between sections from Sncawt/wt, Sncawt/GFP, and SncaGFP/GFP mice (Fig. 2B). In addition, GFP-fluorescence overlapped almost completely with that of aSyn in Sncawt/GFP mice, further indicating the intact tagged protein is normally expressed and does not perturbate the distribution of wt aSyn (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Distribution of aSyn-GFP in brain and spinal cord. A, Expression pattern of aSyn-GFP in the brain from a homozygous (SncaGFP/GFP) animal. Endogenous GFP fluorescence is shown. Individual brain areas are shown on the right. B, Immunofluorescence showing aSyn expression patterns in wt, Sncawt/GFP, SncaGFP/GFP, and Snca−/− mice using a pan-aSyn antibody (SNL1). C, Co-localization of aSyn-GFP and endogenous aSyn in the hippocampus (CA3) of a Sncawt/GFP mouse labeled with SNL1. CTX = cortex; HIP = hippocampus; CP = caudate putamen; LGP = lateral globus pallidus; MGP = medial globus pallidus; TH = thalamus; SNr = substantia nigra pars reticulata; OB = olfactory bulb; SI = substantia innominata. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 2 mm (B), 20 µm (C).

Co-immunostaining of GFP with markers for different CNS cell types showed that aSyn-GFP is expressed by neurons (Tuj1-positive) but is not detectable in astrocytes (GFAP-positive), oligodendrocytes (CNPase-positive) or microglial (Iba1-positive) cells (Fig. 3A). Within neurons, aSyn-GFP co-localized with glutamate vesicular transporter (vGLUT; Fig. 3A,B), a presynaptic marker, but not with Tuj1, consistent with the known enrichment of aSyn in presynaptic vesicles in excitatory neurons (Maroteaux et al., 1988; Burre, 2015). aSyn-GFP was also detectable in brain areas containing non-glutamatergic neurons (e.g., striatum and olfactory bulb; Fig. 3B), where it co-localized with glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) positive neurons (data not shown). Together, these results suggest that the in vivo distribution of the aSyn-GFP fusion protein closely matches that of wt aSyn at the regional, cellular, and subcellular levels.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Expression of aSyn-GFP in different CNS cell types. A, Co-localization between aSyn-GFP and markers for neurons (vGlut and Tuj1), oligodendrocytes (CNPase), astrocytes (GFAP), and microglia (IBA1) in a SncaGFP/GFP mouse. aSyn-GFP is expressed in neurons (Tuj1-positive cells) and enriched in synaptic vesicles containing vGlut. HIP = hippocampus; CP = caudate putamen; CC = corpus callosum. Scale bar: 10 µm. B, Sagittal brain section from a SncaGFP/GFP mouse stained with an antibody against vGlut. Arrows indicate brain areas in which aSyn-GFP signal is enriched in regions with low vGlut expression. OB = olfactory bulb; SI = substantia innominata; SNr = substantia nigra pars reticulata. Scale bar: 1 mm.

aSyn-GFP is enriched in presynaptic vesicles in Snca-GFP primary neurons

To further determine the utility of these KI mice for studying aSyn pathobiology, we compared the expression levels and subcellular localization of aSyn-GFP in primary neurons derived from Sncawt/GFP, SncaGPF/GFP, and wt mice. Hippocampal and cortical neurons (Fig. 4; data not shown) prepared from postnatal Sncawt/GFP and SncaGPF/GFP mice developed normally in culture, with aSyn-GFP detectable by DIV7. aSyn-GFP was mainly enriched in vesicles (Fig. 4A), similar to what is seen in Snca-GFP brains. As previously reported for wt aSyn, aSyn-GFP was also present in the cell body during early developmental stages (Extended Data Fig. 4-1). Both wt aSyn and aSyn-GFP expression in cultured neurons increased with age before plateauing at DIV10, indicating that the addition of the GFP-tag does not alter the developmentally regulated expression of aSyn in neurons (data not shown). In mature cultures, aSyn-GFP colocalized strongly with Synapsin 1, a marker of synaptic vesicles (Fig. 4A). In addition, aSyn and aSyn-GFP strongly overlap in Sncawt/GFP neurons (Fig. 4B). Therefore, neurons prepared from Snca-GFP mice exhibit the expected synaptic distribution of aSyn and Synapsin 1.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Expression, subcellular localization and synaptic vesicle cycle of aSyn-GFP in primary neurons. Primary hippocampal neurons were derived from newborn pups and kept in culture for 14–21 d. A, Co-localization of aSyn-GFP with the presynaptic marker Synapsin 1. B, Co-localization between endogenous GFP signal and an anti-aSyn antibody (9027) in Sncawt/GFP neurons. Immunocytochemistry showing distribution of aSyn in wt neurons is shown in Extended Data Figure 4-1. C, Western blotting of lysates from neurons of the indicated genotypes using antibodies against aSyn, GFP, and GAPDH. Complete blot is shown in Extended Data Figure 4-2. D, Heterozygous primary hippocampal neurons were imaged before and after stimulation with 90 mm KCl. E, Quantification of fluorescence intensity of GFP positive vesicles before (F0) and following (F1) treatment with control (KRH, Krebs Ringer HEPES) or stimulation buffer (HK, 90 mm KCl). The data are expressed as the F1/F0 ratio (mean ± SEM from two subfields per dish, >70 vesicles per dish, N = 3–4 dishes from two to three independent cultures). Asterisks indicate statistical significance (p = 0.0061) as determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test with Welch’s correction. Comparison of aSyn and Synapsin 1 redistribution by immunostaining is shown in Extended Data Figure 4-3. Scale bars: 20 µm (A, B), 10 µm (crop), 10 µm (D).

Extended Data Figure 4-1

Mature Sncawt/wt primary hippocampal neurons were stained with the same anti-aSyn antibody as in Figure 4 (9027). The staining confirms the cell body and vesicular localization of untagged aSyn. Scale bar: 10 µm. Download Figure 4-1, TIF file.

Extended Data Figure 4-2

Full 9027 Western blotting for Figure 4C. Download Figure 4-2, TIF file.

Extended Data Figure 4-3

Sncawt/GFP neurons were fixed before, after a 2-min exposure to 90 mm KCl, or after a 15-min recovery from HK stimulation and co-stained with an anti-Synapsin 1 antibody. Scale bar: 10 µm. Download Figure 4-3, TIF file.

Immunoblot analysis of hippocampal culture lysates with aSyn and GFP antibodies confirmed the expression of a single major species consistent with intact aSyn-GFP at the expected ratios with respect to the wt protein in each genotype (Fig. 4C; Extended Data Fig. 4-2). Taken together, aSyn-GFP maintains normal subcellular expression and distribution without disrupting the morphology of synaptic vesicles.

aSyn-GFP participates in the synaptic vesicle cycle with kinetics similar to wt aSyn

To further establish that aSyn-GFP has similar functional properties to wt aSyn, we examined its ability to participate in synaptic vesicle cycling in primary hippocampal neurons. In wt neurons, aSyn is dispersed following stimulation with 90 mm KCl and partially repopulates into vesicles after stimulus removal (Fortin et al., 2005). We therefore performed live imaging on DIV18–DIV22 Sncawt*/GFP hippocampal neurons to monitor the redistribution of aSyn-GFP during stimulation. Addition of KCl induced a marked decrease in aSyn-GFP intensity in individual vesicles within 2 min of treatment (Fig. 4D,E), in agreement with the dynamics previously reported for wt aSyn (Fortin et al., 2005). Similar results were observed in SncaGFP/GFP cultures (data not shown). Neurons were also fixed and immunostained for Synapsin 1, which is known to disperse following stimulation and redistribute back to synaptic vesicles shortly after the stimulus end (Chi et al., 2001). Unlike Synapsin 1, aSyn-GFP did not fully re-establish its vesicular localization after a 15-min recovery period following KCl treatment (Extended Data Fig. 4-3). These results further support that aSyn-GFP is functionally similar to its wt counterpart.

aSyn-GFP is detectable in multiple peripheral cell types

Since expression of aSyn-GFP in Snca-GFP mice remains under the control of the endogenous promoter and regulatory elements, we predicted that its distribution in peripheral organs would also parallel that of the wt protein. We therefore surveyed aSyn-GFP expression in a variety of organs across multiple anatomic regions. As previously reported for wt aSyn (Barbour et al., 2008), GFP fluorescence was prominent in blood (primarily erythrocytes; Fig. 5A) and bone marrow (data not shown). Endogenous GFP fluorescence in blood was also detectable in SncaGFP/GFP mice by spectrophotometry (Fig. 5B) and confirmed by immunoblotting in lysates prepared from sedimented red blood cells (Fig. 5C). We also detected GFP fluorescence in unfixed colon samples (Fig. 5D, left panel) in which aSyn-GFP could be found in neurons of the myenteric plexus. Although the native GFP signal was lost after fixation, expression of the fusion protein was confirmed in this tissue using an anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 5D, right panels). In contrast, GFP fluorescence in most other fixed tissues tested was indistinguishable from wt mice suggesting levels below our detection limit, consistent with previous studies.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Expression of aSyn-GFP in peripheral cells. A, Total blood from Sncawt/wt or SncaGFP/GFP mice visualized using either endogenous GFP fluorescence, an anti-GFP, or anti-aSyn antibody (9027). B, Spectrophotometric reading of GFP signal from lysed total blood from either Sncawt/wt or SncaGFP/GFP mice. Data are shown as mean ±SEM, and statistical significance is indicated by asterisks (two-tailed unpaired t test with Welch’s correction; N = 3 animals/genotype, p < 0.0001). C, Western blotting confirmation of the expression of aSyn-GFP in red blood cells. Asterisks denote non-specific bands. D, aSyn-GFP in the myenteric plexus of the colon of unfixed whole mounts from SncaGFP/GFP mice detected using endogenous fluorescence (left) or an anti-GFP antibody in fixed samples (right). Wt aSyn in Sncawt/wt mice was detected in fixed samples (right) using an aSyn antibody (SNL-1; N = 3 per genotype). Scale bars: 10 µm (A), 100 µm (D, left), 50 µm (D, right).

GFP-tag partially inhibits but does not abolish aSyn fibril assembly

The normal distribution and functioning of aSyn-GFP in Snca-GFP mice led us to examine its utility for investigating the pathobiology of aSyn, specifically its formation into amyloid fibrils that accumulate within intracellular Lewy pathology found in PD and DLB (Arima et al., 1998; Takahashi and Wakabayashi, 2001). Since previous studies showed that the presence of a GFP-tag can alter the rate of aSyn aggregation (Afitska et al., 2017), we tested whether recombinant aSyn-GFP can self-assemble into fibrils under conditions where wt aSyn readily polymerizes. Independent reactions containing either recombinant wt aSyn or aSyn-GFP monomer were incubated with agitation as previously described (Luk et al., 2016). Within 6 h of the start of the reaction, the majority of wt aSyn had converted to insoluble species which accounted for nearly all aSyn by 8 h (Fig. 6A-C). In parallel reactions, aSyn-GFP also accumulated in the insoluble fraction over time but with significantly delayed kinetics (Fig. 6A-C). When equimolar concentrations of untagged aSyn and aSyn-GFP were combined, both forms aggregated at a similar rate that fell between that of each individual protein (Fig. 6C; Extended Data Fig. 6-1). Inspection of the products from these reactions by electron microscopy (Fig. 6D), revealed the presence of filamentous structures compatible with those previously reported for aSyn (Luk et al., 2009). Of note, aSyn-GFP fibrils assembled in vitro are able to induce aSyn pathology in wt and Snca-GFP neurons (Karpowicz et al., 2017; Extended Data Fig. 6-2; data not shown). Taken together, aSyn-GFP is fibril assembly competent, albeit with slower kinetics, which may be mitigated in the presence of untagged aSyn monomer.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

aSyn-GFP is assembly-competent in vitro. A, Recombinant wt, aSyn-GFP or a (1:1) mixture of both were agitated for the indicated times at 37°C. Insoluble pellet (P) and soluble supernatant (S) fractions were separated after ultracentrifugation and visualized by Coomassie Blue staining after SDS-PAGE. B, Quantification of data in A, expressed as the relative percentage of protein in the pellet fraction over time. Data (N = 3–5 per time point, from two different batches of monomers) were fitted to a sigmoidal curve. Complete blot is shown in Extended Data Figure 6-1. C, Time to 50% pellet (absolute EC50) was calculated after fitting the data (mean+ SEM) to a sigmoidal curve. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to analyze statistical significance; *p < 0.05, ***p = 0.002. D, Transmission electron microscopy images of negatively stained fibrils from the indicated monomer(s) after 7 d of shaking show fibril formation from all the monomers tested (N = 4). Pathogenicity of aSyn-GFP PFFs is shown in Extended Data Figure 6-2. Scale bar: 100 nm.

Extended Data Figure 6-1

Full Western blottings (Syn9027) for Figure 6A, right panels. Download Figure 6-1, TIF file.

Extended Data Figure 6-2

Wt (CD1) primary hippocampal neurons were treated with wt or GFP-tagged aSyn PFFs and stained for phosphorylated aSyn (pSyn) and NeuN 14 d post-PFFs addition. The presence of pSyn signal in aSyn-GFP PFFs-treated neurons demonstrate that these fibrils are competent in inducing aSyn pathology. Scale bar: 20 µm. Download Figure 6-2, TIF file.

Incorporation of aSyn-GFP into pathologic aggregates following PFF-seeding in Snca-GFP neurons

We and others have previously demonstrated that aSyn fibrils internalized by neurons can template the conversion of endogenously expressed aSyn into fibrillar forms that accumulate as Lewy-like inclusions (Volpicelli-Daley et al., 2011). We therefore determined whether primary hippocampal neurons from Snca-GFP mice are permissive to such pathologic seeding following exposure to aSyn PFFs and incorporated aSyn-GFP into insoluble intraneuronal inclusions. Neurons from Sncawt/GFP mice developed inclusions resembling Lewy neurites and Lewy bodies when exposed to mouse wt PFFs, although the level of pathology, as measured by pSer129 aSyn (pSyn) immunostaining, was reduced relative to similarly treated wt neurons (Fig. 7A,B). In agreement with our in vitro data showing that the rate of aggregation is reduced when only aSyn-GFP is present, pathology formation at the same time point was further reduced in SncaGFP/GFP neurons. Nevertheless, pSyn was still detectable in a small proportion (∼0.005% of wt) of PFF-exposed SncaGFP/GFP neurons (Fig. 8A,B).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

aSyn-GFP forms LB like aggregates in primary neurons. A, Primary hippocampal neurons were treated with mouse wt aSyn PFFs at 10 DIV and phosphorylated synuclein (pSyn) was detected by immunofluorescence after two additional weeks. MAP2 was used to confirm presence of neurons and to normalize pSyn levels. In each experiment, cultures from all three genotypes were present on individual plates and subjected to same treatments and handling. Three to four wells/batch of culture were used and normalized to wt cultures (N = 3 from three independent cultures). Live imaging of aSyn-GFP pathology formation is shown in Movie 1. B, Quantification of data in A normalized to wt cultures (9–12 wells from N = 3 independent cultures/genotype; mean ± SEM). Asterisks indicate statistical significance following two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test; p < 0.0001. C, Sequential extraction in 1% TX-100 (TX) and 2% SDS (SDS) of PBS or PFF treated Sncawt/GFP neurons indicates that aSyn-GFP shifts to the insoluble fraction on PFF exposure. Complete immunoblots are shown in Extended Data Figures 7-1, 7-2. D, Immunostaining of PFF-treated Sncawt/GFP neurons with an anti-pSyn antibody (81A) following extraction with 1% TX-100, shows nearly complete overlap with endogenous GFP fluorescence (7 d post-PFF addition). Scale bars: 10 µm (A), 40 µm (insets), 20 µm (D).

Extended Data Figure 7-1

Additional Western blotting (Syn9027) of Sncawt/GFP neurons treated for 14 d with PBS or PFFs and sequentially extracted with 1% TX-100 followed by 2% SDS. Download Figure 7-1, TIF file.

Extended Data Figure 7-2

Western blottings of primary Sncawt/GFP hippocampal neurons following exposure to PBS or PFFs and sequential extraction with 1% TX-100 (TX) and 2% SDS. Phosphorylation of aSyn-GFP insoluble aggregates was revealed using the MJFR13 antibody. Total aSyn was detected using the anti-aSyn antibody 9027. Download Figure 7-2, TIF file.

In both Sncawt/GFP and SncaGFP/GFP neurons, co-labeling with antibodies to pSyn and GFP revealed near-complete co-localization within inclusions following TX-100 extraction (Fig. 7D; data not shown), indicating that aSyn-GFP was co-incorporated in phosphorylated aggregates and that aggregates are insoluble. Live imaging of PFF induced GFP containing aggregates in Sncawt/GFP neurons also show how aSyn-GFP acquires a serpentine like structure and display atypical (compare to aSyn-labeled synaptic vesicles) intracellular motility (Movie 1). Biochemical analysis of TX-100 insoluble proteins from these cultures also confirmed that aSyn-GFP shifted to this fraction after PFF treatment (Fig. 7C; Extended Data Fig 7-1) and that the GFP-tagged insoluble material is phosphorylated (Extended Data Fig. 7-2).

Movie 1.

Live imaging of PFF transduced Sncawt/GFP neurons. Sncawt/GFP neurons plated on MatTekTM were transduced at 10 DIV with 2 μg/ml of mouse wild-type PFF and image, 5 days post-transduction, for the indicated time every 15 min at 37°C, in the presence of 5% CO2. Arrows indicate vesicular aSyn-GFP and arrowheads serpentine-like or aggregated aSyn -GFP. Scale bar: 10 µm.

We further determined whether aSyn-GFP can also undergo pathologic conversion in vivo by using intracranial injection to target PFFs into the mouse brain, a model that allows the induction and propagation of aSyn pathology in presence of wt levels of this protein. For this, we selected the hippocampus, because of previous reports (Luna et al., 2018; Nouraei et al., 2018) and our present data showing high levels of aSyn/aSyn-GFP expression in this region. In agreement with this, injection of wt mouse aSyn PFFs into the hippocampus induced the formation of pSyn-positive inclusions within 30 d postinjection (Fig. 8A,B). Pathology levels were highest in wt mice, followed by Sncawt/GFP animals, with very low pathology observed in SncaGFP/GFP mice (Fig. 8A-C). Similar results were obtained by injecting PFFs simultaneously into the dorsal striatum, ventral striatum, and overlaying cortex (Extended Data Figs. 8-1, 8-2). In both injection paradigms, pSyn highly co-localized with GFP visualized using an antibody or by its endogenous GFP fluorescence (Fig. 8B; Extended Data Fig. 8-2, 8-3), indicating that the fusion protein is incorporated in aSyn aggregates similarly to what we observed in cultured neurons (Fig. 7A,D). Of note and consistent with the injection data, Snca-GFP mice do not develop pathology during normal aging (data not shown) marking a notable difference with previous models overexpressing GFP-tagged aSyn (Hansen et al., 2013).

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Intracranial injection of aSyn PFFs induces formation of intraneuronal pathology in Sncawt/GFP mice. Five micrograms of recombinant mouse aSyn PFFs were injected into the hippocampus of Sncawt/wt, Sncawt/GFP, or SncaGFP/GFP mice. Brains were analyzed 30 d postinjection (dpi) by immunohistochemistry using anti-pSyn (81A; A) and immunofluorescence using an anti-pSyn (81A) or anti-GFP antibody (B). C, Quantification of the data in A. Plots indicate mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate statistical significance following one-way ANOVA (brain area) with Tukey’s post hoc test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005. CA = cornu ammonus; DG = dentate gyrus. Scale bars: 50 µm, 10 µm (crop). Co-localization of PFF-induced pathology in other brain regions are shown in Extended Data Figures 8-1, 8-2, 8-3.

Extended Data Figure 8-1

Five micrograms of recombinant PFFs were injected into the dorsal striatum, ventral striatum, and cortex of wt, heterozygous, and homozygous Snca-GFP mice. Pathology was analyzed at 90 d postinjection (dpi) by immunohistochemistry using an antibody (81A) against pSyn. Scale bars: 50 µm. Download Figure 8-1, TIF file.

Extended Data Figure 8-2

Immunofluorescence using an antibody against pSyn (81A) and an anti-GFP antibody on sections of Sncawt/GFP mice injected with PFFs in the dorsal striatum, ventral striatum, and cortex show high levels of colocalization in both the substantia nigra and amygdala 90 d postinjection. Scale bars: 100 µm, 50 µm (crop). Download Figure 8-2, TIF file.

Extended Data Figure 8-3

Compresstome brain sections derived from Sncawt/GFP mice injected in the hippocampus with PFFs (30 d postinjection) and stained with anti-pSyn antibody (81A) show that GFP-tagged aggregates can also be detected using the endogenous fluorescence of the fluorophore. Scale bar: 50 µm. Download Figure 8-3, TIF file.

Discussion

Clinical and experimental evidence implicate aSyn in multiple neurodegenerative disorders. However, the normal function and regulation of aSyn, along with its role in disease initiation and progression, are not fully understood. Given the dynamic nature of these biological processes, tools that enable the direct visualization of aSyn would facilitate efforts to address these fundamental questions. Moreover, the majority of individuals with synucleinopathy carry neither aSyn mutations nor overexpress aSyn to any measurable extent. To this end, we generated an aSyn-GFP KI mouse line in which endogenous aSyn protein is fused to GFP via its C terminus with the goal of combining the utility of a genetic-encoded fluorescent tag while preserving the protein’s natural distribution throughout the body.

Our data here demonstrate that both heterozygous (Sncawt/GFP) and homozygous (SncaGFP/GFP) mice express aSyn-GFP in a pattern that is indistinguishable from aSyn protein in wt animals across multiple tissues including, but not limited to, the central and enteric nervous systems, erythrocytes, and bone marrow. Within the brain, where aSyn is highly enriched, total aSyn mRNA and protein levels were comparable between wt and KI animals, while expression levels of aSyn-GFP were directly proportional to gene dosage (Fig. 1). In contrast to some previous reports, aSyn-GFP appears to be expressed primarily in its intact form and minimal levels of degraded products were detected (McLean et al., 2001). We speculate that expression of aSyn-GFP at endogenous levels and the inclusion of the short linker between aSyn and GFP may contribute to this stability. When examined in vivo or in primary neuronal cultures derived from KI mice, aSyn-GFP is detectable only in neurons and is correctly localized to a subset of synaptic vesicles. The almost complete co-localization between native and GFP-tagged aSyn in Sncawt/GFP mice suggests that aSyn-GFP does not perturb the expression or localization of its wt counterpart (Figs. 2-4). Indeed, the addition of the GFP-tag appears to have a minimal effect on a complex aspect of aSyn function (i.e., participation in synaptic vesicle cycling) as tagged aSyn disperses after synaptic stimulation (Fig. 4), in agreement with previous studies (Fortin et al., 2005; Unni et al., 2010).

The above characteristics distinguish this KI line from previously reported mammalian models that employ a genetically encoded GFP-tag to label aSyn. In these, the tagged sequence corresponds to wt human aSyn with expression regulated by either a non-Snca promoter (e.g., PDGFβ; Rockenstein et al., 2005) or downstream of the mouse Snca promoter by means of a bacterial artificial chromosome (Hansen et al., 2013). Although robust neuronal expression was achieved in both examples, the distribution and levels of tagged aSyn did not precisely match that of aSyn in the non-transgenic host, and aSyn was also ectopically expressed in additional cell types and regions. Interestingly, GFP-tagged aSyn in these mouse lines also accumulate as lysosome-associated inclusions or undergo phosphorylation at Ser129, a marker of Lewy body and Lewy neurite pathology in human synucleinopathies, with aging. A possible explanation for such differences is that the previously described lines were selected based on high expression levels of the transgene, among other criteria. Total aSyn levels in these mice may have been further amplified by maintaining these mice on a wt genetic background without deletion of the endogenous Snca locus. In contrast, the localization and levels of aSyn-GFP in Sncawt/GFP and SncaGFP/GFP mice matched that of wt mice, and we did not observe any redistribution or modification of aSyn-GFP in mice up to two years of age. We believe these features make aSyn-GFP KI mice particularly amendable for investigating aSyn trafficking and function, a crucial but understudied area of aSyn biology, especially given that these processes are highly sensitive to aSyn levels (Scott and Roy, 2012; Eguchi et al., 2017).

An added advantage is that aSyn-GFP is normally distributed throughout peripheral organs such as neurons in the gastrointestinal tract and red blood cells in this line (Fig. 5). As demonstrated here, this expression also permits rapid quantification of aSyn levels without the need for additional sample processing (e.g., immunostaining). It is anticipated that this will further enable the validation of endogenous aSyn expression in other peripheral tissues, especially those where aSyn is in low abundance, and where detection using immunohistochemistry alone has provided equivocal results. Primary cells derived from aSyn-GFP KI mice are also a resource for investigating the aSyn biology at the cellular level.

In addition to physiological functioning, our work here demonstrates that Sncawt/GFP and, to a much lower extent SncaGFP/GFP, neurons serve as a permissive cellular host for pathologic seeding by misfolded aSyn species. Specifically, recombinant aSyn PFFs induced GFP-positive Lewy-like pathology in cultured hippocampal neurons when introduced into the culture media (Fig. 7) or in multiple CNS regions when PFFs are stereotaxically injected into either dorsal striatum, ventral striatum, and cortex or hippocampus (Fig. 8). Importantly, fibril-induced pathology in Sncawt/GFP and SncaGFP/GFP was distributed in the same brain regions as in wt mice, albeit with different densities, suggesting a similar spreading process within neuroanatomical pathways. The intact aSyn-GFP moiety was incorporated in these intraneuronal inclusions (Figs. 7, 8), confirming that this pathology is formed predominantly by aSyn-GFP derived from the neuronal pool and is consistent with previous studies showing that neurons overexpressing aSyn-GFP support fibril-induced pathology formation (Volpicelli-Daley et al., 2014a; Osterberg et al., 2015). We also find no evidence of the existence of intracellular inclusions containing exclusively untagged or tagged aSyn in PFF-treated neurons, although additional studies are required to ascertain the precise proportion of wt and GFP-tagged aSyn within inclusions.

Although our data clearly show that aSyn-GFP can polymerize into fibrils and can be recruited into Lewy-like pathology in neurons, the kinetics of this process is altered by the presence of the GFP-tag. The attenuated levels of pathology induced by PFF treatment, particularly in SncaGFP/GFP neurons and mice (Figs. 6-8), represent a limitation of using this construct. These observations are in agreement with previous reports and underline the importance of the C terminus domain and protein flexibility in facilitating conversion to a pathologic conformation (McLean et al., 2001; Bertoncini et al., 2005; Afitska et al., 2017), although the constraints brought on by the sterically larger GFP moiety does not abrogate seeding activity. Indeed, aSyn-GFP monomers readily assemble under the same in vitro conditions as untagged aSyn and can be incorporated into fibrils at near stoichiometric levels in presence of an equimolar concentration of wt aSyn monomer, with aggregation kinetics that are intermediate relative to wt aSyn or aSyn-GFP alone (Fig. 6). In line with these in vitro observations, fibril-induced pathologic seeding in neurons and in vivo also show a similar pattern with pathology formation in neurons from wt mice forming inclusions the most rapidly and abundantly, followed by Sncawt/GFP and then SncaGFP/GFP mice. Importantly, like in the case of wt aSyn, GFP-containing aggregates appeared to be morphologically distinct from physiological aSyn and hyper-phosphorylated (Figs. 7, 8). Data from Sncawt/GFP neurons also indicate that recruited aSyn-GFP is detergent insoluble (Fig. 7) and display altered morphology and trafficking (Movie 1). These results support the idea that aggregates containing aSyn-GFP, especially when formed in presence of both tagged and untagged protein, closely resemble wt aSyn pathologic species.

In summary, we have generated a novel in vivo resource for studying multiple aspects of aSyn function under physiological and disease-like conditions without genetic overexpression. In addition, Snca-GFP mice provide the opportunity to concomitantly track and measure soluble and pathologic forms of the protein across relevant tissues. We therefore anticipate that future studies leveraging these animals (e.g., by crossbreeding with other genetic models of disease) should provide additional insights into aSyn biology.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements: We thank Victoria Kehm and Dawn M. Riddle for technical assistance; Myrna Dominick, EunRan Sun, and Chi Li for help with RT-PCR experiments; and staff at the Cell and Developmental Biology Microscopy Core. We also thank members at the Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CNDR) for continuous discussions and Hakeem O. Lawal for reading this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant NS088322 (to K.C.L.) and by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research Grant 100000864.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Abeliovich A, Schmitz Y, Fariñas I, Choi-Lundberg D, Ho WH, Castillo PE, Shinsky N, Verdugo JM, Armanini M, Ryan A, Hynes M, Phillips H, Sulzer D, Rosenthal A (2000) Mice lacking alpha-synuclein display functional deficits in the nigrostriatal dopamine system. Neuron 25:239–252. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80886-7 pmid:10707987
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Afitska K, Fucikova A, Shvadchak VV, Yushchenko DA (2017) Modification of C terminus provides new insights into the mechanism of alpha-synuclein aggregation. Biophys J 113:2182–2191. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.027 pmid:28939194
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Alafuzoff I, Ince PG, Arzberger T, Al-Sarraj S, Bell J, Bodi I, Bogdanovic N, Bugiani O, Ferrer I, Gelpi E, Gentleman S, Giaccone G, Ironside JW, Kavantzas N, King A, Korkolopoulou P, Kovács GG, Meyronet D, Monoranu C, Parchi P, et al. (2009) Staging/typing of Lewy body related alpha-synuclein pathology: a study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium. Acta Neuropathol 117:635–652. doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0523-2 pmid:19330340
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Arima K, Uéda K, Sunohara N, Hirai S, Izumiyama Y, Tonozuka-Uehara H, Kawai M (1998) Immunoelectron-microscopic demonstration of NACP/alpha-synuclein-epitopes on the filamentous component of Lewy bodies in Parkinson's disease and in dementia with Lewy bodies. Brain Res 808:93–100. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00734-3 pmid:9795161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Barbour R, Kling K, Anderson JP, Banducci K, Cole T, Diep L, Fox M, Goldstein JM, Soriano F, Seubert P, Chilcote TJ (2008) Red blood cells are the major source of alpha-synuclein in blood. Neurodegener Dis 5:55–59. doi:10.1159/000112832 pmid:18182779
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Beach TG, Adler CH, Lue L, Sue LI, Bachalakuri J, Henry-Watson J, Sasse J, Boyer S, Shirohi S, Brooks R, Eschbacher J, White CL 3rd., Akiyama H, Caviness J, Shill HA, Connor DJ, Sabbagh MN, Walker DG; Arizona Parkinson's Disease Consortium (2009) Unified staging system for Lewy body disorders: correlation with nigrostriatal degeneration, cognitive impairment and motor dysfunction. Acta Neuropathol 117:613–634. doi:10.1007/s00401-009-0538-8 pmid:19399512
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Bendor JT, Logan TP, Edwards RH (2013) The function of alpha-synuclein. Neuron 79:1044–1066. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.004 pmid:24050397
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Bertoncini CW, Fernandez CO, Griesinger C, Jovin TM, Zweckstetter M (2005) Familial mutants of alpha-synuclein with increased neurotoxicity have a destabilized conformation. J Biol Chem 280:30649–30652. doi:10.1074/jbc.C500288200 pmid:16020550
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rüb U, de Vos RA, Jansen Steur EN, Braak E (2003) Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Aging 24:197–211. doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00065-9 pmid:12498954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Burre J (2015) The synaptic function of alpha-synuclein. J Parkinsons Dis 5:699–713.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Burré J, Sharma M, Südhof TC (2018) Cell biology and pathophysiology of alpha-synuclein. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 8:a024091. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a024091
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Chi P, Greengard P, Ryan TA (2001) Synapsin dispersion and reclustering during synaptic activity. Nat Neurosci 4:1187–1193. doi:10.1038/nn756 pmid:11685225
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. Covell DJ, Robinson JL, Akhtar RS, Grossman M, Weintraub D, Bucklin HM, Pitkin RM, Riddle D, Yousef A, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM-Y (2017) Novel conformation-selective alpha-synuclein antibodies raised against different in vitro fibril forms show distinct patterns of Lewy pathology in Parkinson's disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 43:604–620.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    Eguchi K, Taoufiq Z, Thorn-Seshold O, Trauner D, Hasegawa M, Takahashi T (2017) Wild-type monomeric alpha-synuclein can impair vesicle endocytosis and synaptic fidelity via tubulin polymerization at the calyx of held. J Neurosci 37:6043–6052. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0179-17.2017 pmid:28576942
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Emmer KL, Waxman EA, Covy JP, Giasson BI (2011) E46K human alpha-synuclein transgenic mice develop Lewy-like and tau pathology associated with age-dependent, detrimental motor impairment. J Biol Chem 286:35104–35118. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.247965 pmid:21846727
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Fortin DL, Nemani VM, Voglmaier SM, Anthony MD, Ryan TA, Edwards RH (2005) Neural activity controls the synaptic accumulation of alpha-synuclein. J Neurosci 25:10913–10921. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2922-05.2005 pmid:16306404
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Giasson BI, Duda JE, Quinn SM, Zhang B, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (2002) Neuronal alpha-synucleinopathy with severe movement disorder in mice expressing A53T human alpha-synuclein. Neuron 34:521–533. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00682-7 pmid:12062037
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Goedert M, Spillantini MG, Tredici KD, Braak H (2013) 100 years of Lewy pathology. Nat Rev Neurol 9:13–24. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.242 pmid:23183883
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Hansen C, Björklund T, Petit GH, Lundblad M, Murmu RP, Brundin P, Li JY (2013) A novel α-synuclein-GFP mouse model displays progressive motor impairment, olfactory dysfunction and accumulation of α-synuclein-GFP. Neurobiol Dis 56:145–155. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2013.04.017 pmid:23643841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Hawrylycz MJ, Lein ES, Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, Shen EH, Ng L, Miller JA, van de Lagemaat LN, Smith KA, Ebbert A, Riley ZL, Abajian C, Beckmann CF, Bernard A, Bertagnolli D, Boe AF, Cartagena PM, Chakravarty MM, Chapin M, Chong J, Dalley RA, et al. (2012) An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489:391–399. doi:10.1038/nature11405 pmid:22996553
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Kahle PJ, Neumann M, Ozmen L, Müller V, Odoy S, Okamoto N, Jacobsen H, Iwatsubo T, Trojanowski JQ, Takahashi H, Wakabayashi K, Bogdanovic N, Riederer P, Kretzschmar HA, Haass C (2001) Selective insolubility of alpha-synuclein in human Lewy body diseases is recapitulated in a transgenic mouse model. Am J Pathol 159:2215–2225. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63072-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Karpowicz RJ Jr., Haney CM, Mihaila TS, Sandler RM, Petersson EJ, Lee VM (2017) Selective imaging of internalized proteopathic alpha-synuclein seeds in primary neurons reveals mechanistic insight into transmission of synucleinopathies. J Biol Chem 292:13482–13497. doi:10.1074/jbc.M117.780296 pmid:28611062
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Koros C, Simitsi A, Stefanis L (2017) Genetics of Parkinson's disease: genotype-phenotype correlations. Int Rev Neurobiol 132:197–231. doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2017.01.009 pmid:28554408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Krüger R, Kuhn W, Müller T, Woitalla D, Graeber M, Kösel S, Przuntek H, Epplen JT, Schöls L, Riess O (1998) Ala30Pro mutation in the gene encoding alpha-synuclein in Parkinson's disease. Nat Genet 18:106–108. doi:10.1038/ng0298-106 pmid:9462735
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Lazarenko RM, DelBove CE, Zhang Q (2018) Fluorescent measurement of synaptic activity using FM dyes in dissociated hippocampal cultured neurons. Bio Protoc 8:e2690. doi:10.21769/BioProtoc.2690
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    Logan T, Bendor J, Toupin C, Thorn K, Edwards RH (2017) α-Synuclein promotes dilation of the exocytotic fusion pore. Nat Neurosci 20:681–689. doi:10.1038/nn.4529 pmid:28288128
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Luk KC, Song C, O'Brien P, Stieber A, Branch JR, Brunden KR, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (2009) Exogenous alpha-synuclein fibrils seed the formation of Lewy body-like intracellular inclusions in cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20051–20056. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908005106 pmid:19892735
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Luk KC, Kehm V, Carroll J, Zhang B, O'Brien P, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (2012) Pathological α-synuclein transmission initiates Parkinson-like neurodegeneration in nontransgenic mice. Science 338:949–953. doi:10.1126/science.1227157 pmid:23161999
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Luk KC, Covell DJ, Kehm VM, Zhang B, Song IY, Byrne MD, Pitkin RM, Decker SC, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (2016) Molecular and biological compatibility with host alpha-synuclein influences fibril pathogenicity. Cell Rep 16:3373–3387. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.053 pmid:27653697
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Luna E, Decker SC, Riddle DM, Caputo A, Zhang B, Cole T, Caswell C, Xie SX, Lee VMY, Luk KC (2018) Differential α-synuclein expression contributes to selective vulnerability of hippocampal neuron subpopulations to fibril-induced toxicity. Acta Neuropathol 135:855–875. doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1829-8 pmid:29502200
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Maroteaux L, Campanelli JT, Scheller RH (1988) Synuclein: a neuron-specific protein localized to the nucleus and presynaptic nerve terminal. J Neurosci 8:2804–2815. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-08-02804.1988
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Masliah E, Rockenstein E, Veinbergs I, Mallory M, Hashimoto M, Takeda A, Sagara Y, Sisk A, Mucke L (2000) Dopaminergic loss and inclusion body formation in alpha-synuclein mice: implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Science 287:1265–1269. doi:10.1126/science.287.5456.1265 pmid:10678833
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Masuda-Suzukake M, Nonaka T, Hosokawa M, Oikawa T, Arai T, Akiyama H, Mann DM, Hasegawa M (2013) Prion-like spreading of pathological α-synuclein in brain. Brain 136:1128–1138. doi:10.1093/brain/awt037 pmid:23466394
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Masuda-Suzukake M, Nonaka T, Hosokawa M, Kubo M, Shimozawa A, Akiyama H, Hasegawa M (2014) Pathological alpha-synuclein propagates through neural networks. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:88. doi:10.1186/s40478-014-0088-8 pmid:25095794
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Matsuoka Y, Vila M, Lincoln S, McCormack A, Picciano M, LaFrancois J, Yu X, Dickson D, Langston WJ, McGowan E, Farrer M, Hardy J, Duff K, Przedborski S, Di Monte DA (2001) Lack of nigral pathology in transgenic mice expressing human alpha-synuclein driven by the tyrosine hydroxylase promoter. Neurobiol Dis 8:535–539. doi:10.1006/nbdi.2001.0392 pmid:11442360
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    McLean PJ, Kawamata H, Hyman BT (2001) α-Synuclein-enhanced green fluorescent protein fusion proteins form proteasome sensitive inclusions in primary neurons. Neuroscience 104:901–912. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00113-0 pmid:11440819
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Nemani VM, Lu W, Berge V, Nakamura K, Onoa B, Lee MK, Chaudhry FA, Nicoll RA, Edwards RH (2010) Increased expression of alpha-synuclein reduces neurotransmitter release by inhibiting synaptic vesicle reclustering after endocytosis. Neuron 65:66–79. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.023 pmid:20152114
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Nouraei N, Mason DM, Miner KM, Carcella MA, Bhatia TN, Dumm BK, Soni D, Johnson DA, Luk KC, Leak RK (2018) Critical appraisal of pathology transmission in the α-synuclein fibril model of Lewy body disorders. Exp Neurol 299:172–196. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.10.017 pmid:29056362
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Osterberg VR, Spinelli KJ, Weston LJ, Luk KC, Woltjer RL, Unni VK (2015) Progressive aggregation of alpha-synuclein and selective degeneration of Lewy inclusion-bearing neurons in a mouse model of parkinsonism. Cell Rep 10:1252–1260. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.060 pmid:25732816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Peng C, Gathagan RJ, Covell DJ, Medellin C, Stieber A, Robinson JL, Zhang B, Pitkin RM, Olufemi MF, Luk KC, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (2018) Cellular milieu imparts distinct pathological α-synuclein strains in α-synucleinopathies. Nature 557:558–563. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0104-4 pmid:29743672
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Polymeropoulos MH, Lavedan C, Leroy E, Ide SE, Dehejia A, Dutra A, Pike B, Root H, Rubenstein J, Boyer R, Stenroos ES, Chandrasekharappa S, Athanassiadou A, Papapetropoulos T, Johnson WG, Lazzarini AM, Duvoisin RC, Iorio GD, Golbe LI, Nussbaum RL (1997) Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson's disease. Science 276:2045–2047. doi:10.1126/science.276.5321.2045 pmid:9197268
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Recasens A, Dehay B, Bové J, Carballo-Carbajal I, Dovero S, Pérez-Villalba A, Fernagut PO, Blesa J, Parent A, Perier C, Fariñas I, Obeso JA, Bezard E, Vila M (2014) Lewy body extracts from Parkinson disease brains trigger α-synuclein pathology and neurodegeneration in mice and monkeys. Ann Neurol 75:351–362. doi:10.1002/ana.24066 pmid:24243558
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Rey NL, George S, Steiner JA, Madaj Z, Luk KC, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM, Brundin P (2018) Spread of aggregates after olfactory bulb injection of α-synuclein fibrils is associated with early neuronal loss and is reduced long term. Acta Neuropathol 135:65–83. doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1792-9 pmid:29209768
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Rockenstein E, Schwach G, Ingolic E, Adame A, Crews L, Mante M, Pfragner R, Schreiner E, Windisch M, Masliah E (2005) Lysosomal pathology associated with alpha-synuclein accumulation in transgenic models using an eGFP fusion protein. J Neurosci 80:247–259. doi:10.1002/jnr.20446 pmid:15765523
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Schneider SA, Alcalay RN (2017) Neuropathology of genetic synucleinopathies with parkinsonism: review of the literature. Mov Disord 32:1504–1523. doi:10.1002/mds.27193 pmid:29124790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Scott D, Roy S (2012) α-Synuclein inhibits intersynaptic vesicle mobility and maintains recycling-pool homeostasis. J Neurosci 32:10129–10135. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0535-12.2012 pmid:22836248
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Scott DA, Tabarean I, Tang Y, Cartier A, Masliah E, Roy S (2010) A pathologic cascade leading to synaptic dysfunction in alpha-synuclein-induced neurodegeneration. J Neurosci 30:8083–8095. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1091-10.2010 pmid:20554859
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Singleton AB, Farrer M, Johnson J, Singleton A, Hague S, Kachergus J, Hulihan M, Peuralinna T, Dutra A, Nussbaum R, Lincoln S, Crawley A, Hanson M, Maraganore D, Adler C, Cookson MR, Muenter M, Baptista M, Miller D, Blancato J, et al. (2003) Alpha-synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson's disease. Science 302:841. doi:10.1126/science.1090278 pmid:14593171
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Taguchi K, Watanabe Y, Tsujimura A, Tanaka M (2016) Brain region-dependent differential expression of alpha-synuclein. J Comp Neurol 524:1236–1258. doi:10.1002/cne.23901 pmid:26358191
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Takahashi H, Wakabayashi K (2001) The cellular pathology of Parkinson's disease. Neuropathology 21:315–322. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1789.2001.00403.x pmid:11837539
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Tofaris GK, Garcia Reitböck P, Humby T, Lambourne SL, O'Connell M, Ghetti B, Gossage H, Emson PC, Wilkinson LS, Goedert M, Spillantini MG (2006) Pathological changes in dopaminergic nerve cells of the substantia nigra and olfactory bulb in mice transgenic for truncated human alpha-synuclein(1-120): implications for Lewy body disorders. J Neurosci 26:3942–3950. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4965-05.2006 pmid:16611810
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson Å, Kampf C, Sjöstedt E, Asplund A, Olsson I, Edlund K, Lundberg E, Navani S, Szigyarto CAK, Odeberg J, Djureinovic D, Takanen JO, Hober S, Alm T, et al. (2015) Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347:1260419. doi:10.1126/science.1260419 pmid:25613900
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Unni VK, Weissman TA, Rockenstein E, Masliah E, McLean PJ, Hyman BT (2010) In vivo imaging of alpha-synuclein in mouse cortex demonstrates stable expression and differential subcellular compartment mobility. PLoS One 5:e10589. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010589 pmid:20485674
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    van der Putten H, Wiederhold KH, Probst A, Barbieri S, Mistl C, Danner S, Kauffmann S, Hofele K, Spooren WP, Ruegg MA, Lin S, Caroni P, Sommer B, Tolnay M, Bilbe G (2000) Neuropathology in mice expressing human α-synuclein. J Neurosci 20:6021–6029. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-16-06021.2000
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Visanji NP, Brotchie JM, Kalia LV, Koprich JB, Tandon A, Watts JC, Lang AE (2016) α-Synuclein-based animal models of Parkinson's disease: challenges and opportunities in a new era. Trends Neurosci 39:750–762. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.003 pmid:27776749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Volpicelli-Daley LA, Luk KC, Patel TP, Tanik SA, Riddle DM, Stieber A, Meaney DF, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (2011) Exogenous α-synuclein fibrils induce Lewy body pathology leading to synaptic dysfunction and neuron death. Neuron 72:57–71. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.033 pmid:21982369
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Volpicelli-Daley LA, Gamble KL, Schultheiss CE, Riddle DM, West AB, Lee VM (2014a) Formation of α-synuclein Lewy neurite-like aggregates in axons impedes the transport of distinct endosomes. Mol Biol Cell 25:4010–4023. doi:10.1091/mbc.EXIV-02-0741 pmid:25298402
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Volpicelli-Daley LA, Luk KC, Lee VM (2014b) Addition of exogenous α-synuclein preformed fibrils to primary neuronal cultures to seed recruitment of endogenous α-synuclein to Lewy body and Lewy neurite-like aggregates. Nat Protoc 9:2135–2146. doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.143 pmid:25122523
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Wang L, Das U, Scott DA, Tang Y, McLean PJ, Roy S (2014) α-Synuclein multimers cluster synaptic vesicles and attenuate recycling. Curr Biol 24:2319–2326. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.027 pmid:25264250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. Waxman EA, Duda JE, Giasson BI (2008) Characterization of antibodies that selectively detect alpha-synuclein in pathological inclusions. Acta Neuropathol 116:37–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Zarranz JJ, Alegre J, Gómez-Esteban JC, Lezcano E, Ros R, Ampuero I, Vidal L, Hoenicka J, Rodriguez O, Atarés B, Llorens V, Gomez Tortosa E, del Ser T, Muñoz DG, de Yebenes JG (2004) The new mutation, E46K, of alpha-synuclein causes Parkinson and Lewy body dementia. Ann Neurol 55:164–173. doi:10.1002/ana.10795 pmid:14755719
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Zhang BV, Kehm R, Gathagan SN, Leight JQ, Trojanowski VM, Lee KC Luk (2019) Stereotaxic targeting of alpha-synuclein pathology in mouse brain using preformed fibrils. Methods Mol Biol 1948:45–57. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9124-2_5 pmid:30771169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Leonidas Stefanis, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Poul Jensen, Maria Xilouri. Note: If this manuscript was transferred from JNeurosci and a decision was made to accept the manuscript without peer review, a brief statement to this effect will instead be what is listed below.

The manuscript presents a very interesting new model through which asyn at near endogenous levels can be monitored in real time due to a GFP tag. This model may be very useful to the scientific community. However, some issues, delineated below, need to be addressed in order to improve the presentation of the model and its applicability, especially in the context of seeding.

Fig 1. Whether indeed the AS-GFP protein is present at higher levels than WT AS needs to be assessed properly with both wt-AS and AS-GFP on the same membrane and using more epitope specific AS antibodies. This is particularly important, because, if indeed AS_GFP is present at higher levels than the WT, it suggests, given the similar mRNA levels, that the AS-GFP protein may be handled differently from WT AS by the cells and may have a longer half-life.

Figure 2: Figure legend is not very informative. Scale bars should be indicated in the legend. The particular region of the hippocampus from which the images in C were derived should be indicated. There is no indication regarding the area from which the cropped image arose and no indication regarding the scale bar of the cropped image. In general, all the grayscale presented immunofluorescence images cannot be easily appreciated. In all cases where a double immunostaining is presented (like 2C) it is best to have every antibody with a different color, not grayscale. The colocalization does not appear complete, and could be quantified.

The figure legend in Fig 3 is incomplete. Which brain area is shown in 3A and which genotype was used (Snca wt/GFP or Snca GFP/GFP)? What do the authors show in 3B? What do the arrows indicate? Where is the colocalization with GAD that the authors describe in the results section? The authors should specify that there is no apparent colocalization of GFP with Tuj1, presumably because Tuj1 does not stain the presynaptic terminals, where AS mainly resides. High magnification insert should be provided from the GFP-bright areas of SNr, striatuma and olfactory bulb in panel B, that not is described in the legend.

Fig. 4 panel B demonstrates significant AS and GFP in the cell body that in intensity not differs very much from the presynaptic signals. This needs to be clarified by more antibodies and images and should be compared to staining of wt neurons by the same antibodies. It is important to determine if the anterograde axonal transport of AS-GFP is as efficient as for wt-AS because it will inform about the cellular metabolism of the fusion protein.

In Figure 5, Snca wt/wt animals should be also used to ensure the proper comparison with the GFP-tagged proteins. Costaining of endogenous wt aSyn with synapsin 1 both in Snca wt/GFP and in Snca wt/wt animals should be presented.

Figure 6. Quality of the blots, and in particular the presence of non-specific bands, could be improved.

Fig.7 addresses whether purified recombinant AS-GPF can aggregate like AS. The aSyn-GFP immoblot (bottom panel) in A has 11 samples instead of 10. The data provided demonstrates GFP-AS turns insoluble slower than AS and forms more granular albeit elongated structures in contrast to the slender AS fibrils. Experiments are also conducted where AS and AS-GFP are mixed and subjected to sedimentation assays. The Coomassie blue stained gels must not be cut as in Fig. 7A but presented so that both the AS band at 20 kD and the 50 kD AS-GFP bands are visible on the same gel. Moreover, there need to be conducted both thioflavine and K114 fluorescence spectroscopy of the aggregates to ascertain the AS-GFP aggregates indeed are of an amyloid nature.

In Figure 8A, double immunostaining with paSyn and MAP2 should show clearly the localization of paSyn within MAP-positive processes. It is especially crucial to demonstrates this in the asyn-GFP/a-Syn-GFP neurons, where the p-aSyn staining is very faint, and issues are raised about its specificity. The authors should also demonstrate the GFP fluorescence for those cultures expressing the fusion protein and the aggregates should also be detected using an aggregate specific antibody like the Abcam MJF14.

In Figure 8C, there is only one sample demonstrated, but the assay using protein fractionation will carry some variation. Hence samples in dupli- or triplicates should be analyzed. How big is the reduction in wtAS and AS-GFP in the TX100 soluble fraction upon addition of PFF? The authors should ensure that the results with the GFP antibody do not represent remnants of bands recognized with the aSyn Ab following stripping. A pS129 immunoblot could determine if the SDS-soluble AS-GFP is phosphorylated on Ser129 and to the same extent as the native cellular AS. This information is crucial and needs to be provided. Panel D focuses on colocalisation of pS129 and GFP fluorescence and does not show a perfect match. More high and lower magnification images need to be provided, and there should also be staining by aggregate specific antibodies like e.g. Abcam MJF14 to really convince the readers that AS-GFP can incorporate in or trace aggregates formed in cellulo. In 8D, a square in the merged image must indicate the area from where the cropped image was taken. Cropped images should contain both individual immunotainings and the merged images. Also, scale bars are missing in all panels.

Fig. 9 demonstrates pS129 pathology after in vivo PFF injection into the hippocampus. Wt/wt mice demonstrate the strongest pathology in the nerve cell soma with nearly absent staining in the GFP/GFP mice. However, in the neurites similar pathology occurs in wt/AS-GFP mice, and in CA3 and DG significant pathology occur even in the AS-GFP/AS-GFP. Immunoblots should be provided that demonstrate that the pS129 signal indeed is on the AS-GFP moiety as suggested by the AS-GFP/AS-GFP mouse staining. If this is the case, then it will strengthen the conclusion that even the AS-GFP/AS-GFP model will be useful for studies of templated AS aggregate spreading. In B, fluorescence staining images should also be provided for the conditions with and without PFFs for all 3 groups of mice. For the Extended Figure 9B, a co-staining with a neuronal marker is required. For the nigra, co-staining with TH is preferred.

The authors should be clear about the limitations of the model, especially regarding the limited seeding of GFP-aSyn.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 4
July/August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Snca-GFP Knock-In Mice Reflect Patterns of Endogenous Expression and Pathological Seeding
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Snca-GFP Knock-In Mice Reflect Patterns of Endogenous Expression and Pathological Seeding
Anna Caputo, Yuling Liang, Tobias D. Raabe, Angela Lo, Mian Horvath, Bin Zhang, Hannah J. Brown, Anna Stieber, Kelvin C. Luk
eNeuro 11 August 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0007-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0007-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Snca-GFP Knock-In Mice Reflect Patterns of Endogenous Expression and Pathological Seeding
Anna Caputo, Yuling Liang, Tobias D. Raabe, Angela Lo, Mian Horvath, Bin Zhang, Hannah J. Brown, Anna Stieber, Kelvin C. Luk
eNeuro 11 August 2020, 7 (4) ENEURO.0007-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0007-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • α-synuclein
  • green fluorescent protein
  • Knock-in mouse
  • Lewy pathology
  • preformed fibrils

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Methods/New Tools

  • Citric Acid Water as an Alternative to Water Restriction for High-Yield Mouse Behavior
  • Using Head-Mounted Ethanol Sensors to Monitor Olfactory Information and Determine Behavioral Changes Associated with Ethanol-Plume Contact during Mouse Odor-Guided Navigation
  • P2X-GCaMPs as Versatile Tools for Imaging Extracellular ATP Signaling
Show more Research Article: Methods/New Tools

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Time course of alterations in adult spinal motoneuron properties in the SOD1(G93A) mouse model of ALS
  • Use of a self-delivering Anti-CCL3 FANA Oligonucleotide as an innovative approach to target inflammation after Spinal Cord Injury
  • Postnatal fluoxetine treatment alters perineuronal net formation and maintenance in the hippocampus
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.