Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Methods/New Tools, Novel Tools and Methods

An Intersectional Viral-Genetic Method for Fluorescent Tracing of Axon Collaterals Reveals Details of Noradrenergic Locus Coeruleus Structure

Nicholas W. Plummer, Daniel J. Chandler, Jeanne M. Powell, Erica L. Scappini, Barry D. Waterhouse and Patricia Jensen
eNeuro 30 April 2020, 7 (3) ENEURO.0010-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0010-20.2020
Nicholas W. Plummer
1Neurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Chandler
2Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ 08084
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel J. Chandler
Jeanne M. Powell
1Neurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica L. Scappini
3Signal Transduction Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry D. Waterhouse
2Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ 08084
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Jensen
1Neurobiology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patricia Jensen
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    TrAC permits fluorescent labeling of genetically defined neuron populations based on axonal projections. Schematic diagrams show a simple version of TrAC using two recombinases and a dual-recombinase-responsive fluorescent indicator allele. Fluorescent labeling is restricted to neurons expressing recombinase A which project to the brain region injected with the retrograde-transported virus encoding recombinase B.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Location of mPFC-protecting noradrenergic neurons within the LC. A, Schematic diagram of the RC::RFLTG indicator allele and coronal schematic of mouse forebrain section showing position of CAV2-Cre injection. B, Representative coronal sections through the rostrocaudal extent of the ipsilateral LC from a TrAC-LC mouse (40-μm free-floating sections) showing distribution of EGFP-labeled (green) and tdTomato-labeled (magenta) neurons. Scale bar, 200 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Distribution of axon collaterals from LC neurons projecting to mPFC. Representative fluorescent images show Cre+ (EGFP-labeled, green) and Cre-negative (tdTomato-labeled, magenta) axons in select forebrain and midbrain regions of a TrAC-LC mouse injected with CAV2-Cre in mPFC. Numbers in the upper right corner of each image indicate the percent of LC-NE axons in the image that are EGFP+. The bar graph (n = 4 mice) indicates percentage of LC-NE axons at each brain region that originate from EGFP+ mPFC-projecting LC-NE neurons (mean ± SEM). The dotted line represents the noise in the green channel (average green pixel count in areas qualitatively lacking EGFP-labeled axons divided by average total pixel count). Percentages below the dotted line are indistinguishable from noise. The scale bar for fluorescent images indicates 100 μm, and each image represents 13% of the volume quantified in the bar graph. mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; Cg Ctx, cingulate cortex; M1, primary motor cortex; BNST, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; CA1, area CA1 of the hippocampus; BLA, basolateral amygdala; BMA, basomedial amygdala; LH, lateral hypothalamus; PVN, paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus; AV, anteroventral thalamic nucleus; PV, paraventricular thalamic nucleus; VL, ventrolateral thalamic nucleus; VM, ventromedial thalamic nucleus; MG, medial geniculate nucleus; Sup. coll., superior colliculus; SNr, substantia nigra.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Location of motor cortex-projecting noradrenergic neurons within the LC. A, Coronal schematic of mouse forebrain section showing position of CAV2-Cre injection. B, Representative coronal sections through the rostrocaudal extent of the ipsilateral LC from a TrAC-LC mouse (40-μm virtual sections from PACT-cleared tissue) showing distribution of EGFP-labeled (green) and tdTomato-labeled (magenta) neurons. Scale bar, 200 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Distribution of axon collaterals from LC neurons projecting to motor cortex. Representative fluorescent images show Cre+ (EGFP-labeled, green) and Cre-negative (tdTomato-labeled, magenta) axons in select forebrain and midbrain regions of a TrAC-LC mouse injected with CAV2-Cre in M1. Numbers in the upper right corner of each image indicate the percent of LC-NE axons in the image that are EGFP+. The bar graph (n = 3 mice) indicates the percentage of LC-NE axons at each target region that originate from EGFP+ M1-projecting LC-NE neurons (are mean ± SEM). The dotted line represents the noise in the green channel (average green pixel count in areas qualitatively lacking EGFP-labeled axons, divided by average total pixel count). Percentages below the dotted line are indistinguishable from noise. The scale bar for fluorescent images indicates 100 μm, and each image represents 13% of the volume quantified in the bar graph.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Distribution of axon collaterals from mPFC-projecting and M1-projecting LC-NE neurons differs from that of the LC as a whole and from each other. Bar graphs show fractional distribution of labeled mPFC-projecting, M1-projecting, or all LC-NE neurons at select target regions. Axon density at each region is represented as a fraction of labeled axons in all imaged regions. Bar graph data are mean ± SEM and were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. A, Comparison of mPFC-projecting (n = 4 mice, EGFP+) and all LC-NE neurons (n = 7 mice, sum of EGFP+ and tdTomato+ axons). LC subpopulation by target region interaction: F(17,153) = 8.072, p < 0.0001. Bonferroni post hoc test, ****p < 0.0001 [95% confidence interval of difference (CI of diff.): mPFC, −0.1441 to −0.06482; Cg Ctx, −0.1059 to −0.02655; AV, 0.03218 to 0.1115]. B, Comparison of M1-projecting (n = 3 mice, EGFP+) and all LC-NE neurons (as above). LC subpopulation by target region interaction: F(17,136) = 21.87, p < 0.0001. Bonferroni post hoc test, *p = 0.0176, Cg Ctx (95% CI of diff.: −0.08,684 to −0.004373), *p = 0.0117 PV (95% CI of diff.: 0.005982 to 0.08845), ****p < 0.0001 (95% CI of diff.: mPFC, −0.2037 to −0.1213; M1, −0.2007 to −0.1182; AV, 0.06125 to 0.1437). C, Comparison of mPFC-projecting and M1-projecting LC-NE neurons. Injection site by target region interaction: F(17,85) = 5.152, p < 0.0001. Bonferroni post hoc test, *p < 0.0217 (95% CI of diff.: 0.004639 to 0.1114), ****p < 0.0001 (95% CI of diff.: 0.08626 to 0.1930).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Statistical table

    Data structureType of test95% confidence interval of difference
    aNormalUnpaired t test1.144 to 28.02
    bNormalUnpaired t test–16.90 to 17.99
    cNormalTwo-way repeated measures ANOVA
    (Bonferroni post hoc test)
    0.004639 to 0.1114
    dNormalTwo-way repeated measures ANOVA
    (Bonferroni post hoc test)
    0.08626 to 0.1930
    eNormalUnpaired t test0.006947 to 0.1453
    • See also Figure 6 legend.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 3
Month/Month
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Intersectional Viral-Genetic Method for Fluorescent Tracing of Axon Collaterals Reveals Details of Noradrenergic Locus Coeruleus Structure
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
An Intersectional Viral-Genetic Method for Fluorescent Tracing of Axon Collaterals Reveals Details of Noradrenergic Locus Coeruleus Structure
Nicholas W. Plummer, Daniel J. Chandler, Jeanne M. Powell, Erica L. Scappini, Barry D. Waterhouse, Patricia Jensen
eNeuro 30 April 2020, 7 (3) ENEURO.0010-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0010-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
An Intersectional Viral-Genetic Method for Fluorescent Tracing of Axon Collaterals Reveals Details of Noradrenergic Locus Coeruleus Structure
Nicholas W. Plummer, Daniel J. Chandler, Jeanne M. Powell, Erica L. Scappini, Barry D. Waterhouse, Patricia Jensen
eNeuro 30 April 2020, 7 (3) ENEURO.0010-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0010-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • axon tracing
  • CAV2
  • locus coeruleus
  • noradrenergic
  • norepinephrine
  • recombinase

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Methods/New Tools

  • A Deep Learning Approach for Neuronal Cell Body Segmentation in Neurons Expressing GCaMP Using a Swin Transformer
  • A Fine-Scale and Minimally Invasive Marking Method for Use with Conventional Tungsten Microelectrodes
  • Automated Segmentation of the Mouse Body Language to Study Stimulus-Evoked Emotional Behaviors
Show more Research Article: Methods/New Tools

Novel Tools and Methods

  • A Deep Learning Approach for Neuronal Cell Body Segmentation in Neurons Expressing GCaMP Using a Swin Transformer
  • A Fine-Scale and Minimally Invasive Marking Method for Use with Conventional Tungsten Microelectrodes
  • Automated Segmentation of the Mouse Body Language to Study Stimulus-Evoked Emotional Behaviors
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.