Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Muscarinic signaling induces changes in intrinsic excitability through SK2 channels. A, Differential interference contrast (DIC) image of patch-clamp recording from a layer 2/3 pyramidal neuron in a slice prepared from S1 cortex; scale bar = 10 μm. B, Test protocol for intrinsic plasticity. A stable period of 5 min of baseline was collected, where 500-ms pulses were delivered at 0.05 Hz, eliciting four to eight spikes. Following this is a 5-min induction protocol, where oxo-m (or electrical stimulation in later figures) is applied to the slice. Following induction, cells are monitored with the same test pulses used in baseline. C, Example traces of baseline and postinduction for ACSF wash-on (control), oxo-m wash-on, and oxo-m wash-on in SK2KO cells. D, Time graph for changes in spiking relative to baseline for all three groups. oxo-m/ACSF wash on occurs from minute 5 to 10. E, Bar graph of each groups change in spiking relative to baseline. oxo-m significantly increased from baseline (p = 0.017), while ACSF and oxo-m in SK2KO mice did not (p = 0.68 and p = 0.57, respectively). Additionally, the increase observed in oxo-m was significantly greater than the changes observed in the ACSF and SK2KO oxo-m groups (p = 0.021 and p = 0.042, respectively). *p < 0.05.
- Figure 2.
Induction of intrinsic plasticity through somatic depolarization is SK2 dependent. A, Protocol for inducing changes in intrinsic plasticity, modeled off of Mahon and Charpier (2012). As before, a test pulse of 500 ms is repeated at 0.05 Hz in order to induce four to eight spikes. Following a 5-min baseline, the induction protocol injects depolarizing current at 10 Hz (50-ms pulses), evoking one to three spikes per pulse for 1 s, followed by 2 s of holding current. This 3-s sequence is repeated 100 times for a total of 5 min, and then test pulses identical to baseline are again delivered to monitor for changes in excitability. B, Example traces of WT neurons and SK2KO neurons before and after the induction protocol. C, Time graph for changes in spiking relative to baseline, induction protocol occurs from minute 5 to 10. D, Bar graph for change in spiking relative to baseline. WT significantly increased from baseline, while SK2KO did not (p = 0.0028 and p = 0.55, respectively). The increase observed in WT cells was significantly greater than the changes observed in the SK2KO group (p = 0.044). *p < 0.05.
- Figure 3.
Induction of intrinsic plasticity is CaMKII independent. A, Example traces of WT neurons and T305D neurons before and after the induction protocol. The induction protocol was modified from somatic depolarization where an extracellular stimulus was used in lieu of somatic stimulation (further details in text). B, Time graph for changes in spiking relative to baseline, induction protocol occurs from minute 5 to 10. C, Bar graph for change in spiking relative to baseline. WT and T305D both significantly increased from baseline (p = 0.048 and p = 0.040, respectively). The comparative increase between these two groups was not significantly different (p = 0.27). n.s. = nonsignificant.
- Figure 4.
The role of PKA and CK2 in regulating SK2 channels in intrinsic plasticity. A, Example traces for cells treated with H89, a PKA inhibitor that was present in the bath for the duration of the experiment. B, Time graph for changes in spiking relative to baseline. Either somatic depolarization or oxo-m was applied from minute 5 to 10. C, Example traces for cells treated with TBB, a CK2 inhibitor that was present in the bath for the duration of the experiment. D, Time graph for changes in spiking relative to baseline. Either somatic depolarization or oxo-m was applied from minute 5 to 10. E, Bar graph for depolarization-induced changes in spiking relative to baseline. Both H89 and TBB bath application prevented intrinsic plasticity. F, Bar graph for oxo-m-induced changes in spiking relative to baseline. H89, but not TBB, prevented intrinsic plasticity; *p < 0.05. n.s. = nonsignificant.
- Figure 5.
Intersection of somatic and muscarinic activation. A, Example trace of a cell that received somatic depolarization while oxo-m was in the bath. B, Time graph for changes in spiking relative to baseline, somatic, and oxo-m stimulation occurs at minute 5 to 10. C, Bar graph for change in spiking relative to baseline. Combined stimulation was significantly different from baseline (p = 4.9 × 10−4), and significantly different from somatic or oxo-m stimulation alone (p = 0.035 and p = 0.044, respectively). D, Diagram for how somatic depolarization and muscarinic pathways overlap and interact with SK2 channels. E, Difference in initial firing rate for somatic and synaptic induction protocols. Both groups increased their firing rate per sweep from baseline to post (p = 0.002 and p = 0.020, respectively). F, Spike attenuation ratios for somatic and synaptic induction protocols. The spike attenuation ratio is a ratio of the spiking that takes place in the first half of the sweep, and decreases for both somatic and synaptic cell groups (p = 0.045 and p = 0.034, respectively). G, Shift in attenuation ratio is strongly correlated to change in intrinsic excitability. All cells from groups which had ACSF in the bath during baseline and post are plotted, indicating a strong connection between firing later in sweeps and intrinsic plasticity (p = 3.8 × 10−4).
In this issue
