Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Direct Comparison of Odor Responses of Homologous Glomeruli in the Medial and Lateral Maps of the Mouse Olfactory Bulb

Tokiharu Sato, Ryota Homma and Shin Nagayama
eNeuro 23 January 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0449-19.2020; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0449-19.2020
Tokiharu Sato
1Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030
2Department of System Pathology for Neurological Disorders, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8585, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryota Homma
1Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryota Homma
Shin Nagayama
1Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shin Nagayama
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Cell-type-specific expression of GCaMP3 in OBs and distinct OSN axon trajectories in IPA-responsive glomeruli. A1–A4, Confocal images of OBs in Cre-dependent GCaMP3 reporter mice crossed with OMP-Cre (A1), Gad2-Cre (A2), DAT-Cre (A3), and Pcdh21-Cre (A4) mice. Magnified views of the dashed squares are shown in the insets in A2, A3. GL, EPL, MCL, and GCL indicate GL, external plexiform layer, MCL, and GCL, respectively. B, Process for the DiI labeling of OSN axons. B1, Resting fluorescence of GCaMP3 in the dorsal OB of OMP-Cre mouse. B2, IPA (0.02%)-responsive homologous glomeruli were observed by calcium imaging [color scale indicates ΔF/F0 (%) of GCaMP3 signal]. B3, Brightfield image after DiI implantation. B4, DiI fluorescence 30 min after DiI implantation. B5, DiI fluorescence 8 h after DiI implantation. The locations of IPA-responsive glomeruli are indicated by the white dotted circles. C, Two-photon microscopy image of DiI-labeled glomeruli and OSN axons 2 d after DiI implantation. D, Magnified image of area denoted by orange dotted square in C associated with lateral glomerulus. E, Magnified image of area denoted by yellow dotted square in C associated with medial glomerulus. Two-photon microscopy images of OSN axons that transverse the lateral and medial surface of OB; orange and yellow dotted ellipses (in C–E) represent major axonal projections from lateral and medial glomeruli. F, Two-photon microscopy images of areas of lateral/medial border denoted by blue dotted square in C. Red asterisks indicate axon termination in several glomeruli in which the labeled OSNs probably passed through the surface of the DiI-implanted glomeruli. Some minor axons which did not show clear axon terminations in a glomerulus were observed in area 2 in this case. Ant., anterior. Lat., lateral. Scale bars: 100 μm (A), 200 μm (B, C), 50 μm (D, E), and 100 μm (F).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Odor-evoked response maps and traces among different types of OB neurons. Odor-evoked response maps (A) and traces (B) from OMP-Cre, Gad2-Cre, DAT-Cre, and Pcdh21-Cre mice. Resting GCaMP3 fluorescence images are displayed in the left panels in A. Pseudocolored images in the middle and right panels in A indicate responses to 0.02% IPA and PEA, respectively. Yellow dotted lines and circles in each image show approximately the edge of the left OB and homologous glomeruli evoked by 0.02% IPA and PEA, respectively. The color scales represent ΔF/F0 (%) of GCaMP3 signal. Traces shown in B represent GCaMP3 fluorescence changes from two subsets of homologous glomeruli evoked by indicated concentrations of IPA and PEA shown in A. Red and blue traces indicate lateral and medial glomeruli, respectively. Gray bars under each trace and vertical dotted lines indicate the timing of odor stimulation. Respiration signals are also shown under the traces.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Onset latencies of medial and lateral glomeruli. A, Scatter plots displaying the distributions of onset latencies of medial and lateral glomeruli, which responded to PEA and IPA stimuli. x and y axes indicate onset latencies of medial and lateral glomerular responses, respectively. Individual green and orange dots indicate single trial data of 0.02% and 0.002% PEA or IPA. Gray lines indicate the equal onset latency time points of medial and lateral glomerular responses. B, Box plots displaying the distributions of the differences of onset latencies between medial and lateral glomeruli responses to 0.02% and 0.002% PEA or IPA. Red horizontal lines in each box indicate the medians. Quartiles are shown as whiskers. NS, not significant (two-tailed paired Student’s t test).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Rise times of medial and lateral glomeruli. A, Scatter plots displaying the distributions of rise times of the medial and lateral glomeruli, which responded to PEA and IPA stimuli. x and y axes indicate rise times of medial and lateral glomerular responses, respectively. Individual green and orange dots indicate single trial data of 0.02% and 0.002% PEA or IPA. Gray lines indicate the equal rise time points of medial and lateral glomerular responses. B, Box plots displaying the distributions of the differences of rise times between medial and lateral glomerular responses to 0.02% and 0.002% PEA or IPA. Red horizontal lines in each box indicate the medians. Quartiles are shown as whiskers. NS, not significant (two-tailed paired Student’s t test).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Decay times of medial and lateral glomeruli. A, Scatter plots displaying the distributions of decay times of the medial and lateral glomeruli, which responded to PEA and IPA stimuli. x and y axes indicate decay times of medial and lateral glomerular responses, respectively. Individual green and orange dots indicate single trial data of 0.02% and 0.002% PEA or IPA. Gray lines indicate the equal decay time points of medial and lateral glomerular responses. B, Box plots displaying the distributions of the differences of decay times between medial and lateral glomerular responses to 0.02% and 0.002% PEA or IPA. Red horizontal lines in each box indicate the medians. Quartiles are shown as whiskers. NS, not significant (two-tailed paired Student’s t test).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Peak amplitude of medial and lateral glomerular responses. A, Scatter plots displaying the distributions of peak amplitudes of medial and lateral glomerular responses to PEA and IPA stimuli. x- and y-axes indicate peak amplitudes of medial and lateral glomerular responses, respectively. Individual green and orange dots indicate single trial data of 0.02% and 0.002% PEA or IPA. Gray lines indicate the equal peak amplitudes of medial and lateral glomerular responses. B, Box plots displaying the distributions of the differences of peak amplitudes of medial and lateral glomerular responses to 0.02% and 0.002% PEA or IPA. Red horizontal lines in each box indicate the medians. Quartiles are shown as whiskers. NS, not significant (two-tailed paired Student’s t test).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Respiration-locked calcium fluctuations of medial and lateral glomeruli. A, Schematic illustration of data collection time points and power spectral analysis. The prestimulation and odor stimulation periods are defined in left panel. Middle and right panels are representative examples of power spectral analyses with large frequency ranges in single trials. Respiration-locked fluctuations of calcium signals were prominently observed at 2–4 Hz (arrows). B, Representative results of power spectral analyses of calcium signals during prestimulation (upper rows) and odor stimulation (lower rows) periods in neurons from GCaMP-expressing OMP-Cre, Gad2-Cre, DAT-Cre, and Pcdh21-Cre mice. The calcium response traces of these spectra are shown as 0.02% IPA response signals in Fig. 2B. Blue and red traces indicate medial and lateral glomeruli, respectively (see also Extended Data Fig. 7-1). C, Comparisons of power spectra between the homologous glomeruli during prestimulation (upper rows) and odor stimulation (lower rows) period in neurons from OMP-Cre, Gad2-Cre, DAT-Cre, and Pcdh21-Cre mice. The ratios of peak powers were calculated by dividing the medial glomerular power by the lateral glomerular power in each trial. The powers were calculated after correction for the white-noise background (see Materials and Methods). D, Comparisons of peak power between the prestimulation and odor stimulation periods of the same glomeruli in each cell type. The power ratios were calculated by dividing the power value in the odor stimulation period by that in the prestimulation period after the subtraction of background level (see text); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 two-tailed paired Student’s t test.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Average and error values in each experimental condition

    FigureMiceOdorantConc, %NMean
    (medial), s
    SD
    (medial), s
    Mean
    (lateral), s
    SD
    (lateral), s
    3A OMPPEA0.022790.1380.0860.1420.086
    3A OMPPEA0.0021940.1530.0960.1530.098
    3A OMPIPA0.022970.1510.1010.1540.100
    3A OMPIPA0.0021850.1550.0950.1580.097
    3A Gad2PEA0.021060.1030.0990.1080.096
    3A Gad2PEA0.002840.1250.0830.1280.081
    3A Gad2IPA0.021190.1120.1100.1130.104
    3A Gad2IPA0.002620.1430.1050.1460.101
    3A DATPEA0.022160.1570.1320.1580.127
    3A DATPEA0.0021180.1620.1280.1620.125
    3A DATIPA0.021840.1480.0960.1520.098
    3A DATIPA0.0021230.1600.0980.1660.093
    3A Pcdh21PEA0.021990.1830.1250.1850.129
    3A Pcdh21PEA0.0021300.1970.1260.2020.126
    3A Pcdh21IPA0.022410.1790.1280.1780.123
    3A Pcdh21IPA0.0021760.2100.1470.2140.144
    4A OMPPEA0.022790.6380.3050.6310.300
    4A OMPPEA0.0021940.7320.3070.7240.307
    4A OMPIPA0.022970.6580.3000.6530.304
    4A OMPIPA0.0021850.6790.2790.6740.275
    4A Gad2PEA0.021060.4250.3020.4410.300
    4A Gad2PEA0.002840.4890.2900.4900.297
    4A Gad2IPA0.021190.4860.3010.4960.314
    4A Gad2IPA0.002620.5490.3770.5430.381
    4A DATPEA0.022160.6510.3570.6560.352
    4A DATPEA0.0021180.6560.3240.6540.328
    4A DATIPA0.021840.5940.3100.6060.308
    4A DATIPA0.0021230.5970.3110.6020.301
    4A Pcdh21PEA0.021990.5900.3270.5800.321
    4A Pcdh21PEA0.0021300.5210.3260.5180.330
    4A Pcdh21IPA0.022410.5900.3130.5850.327
    4A Pcdh21IPA0.0021760.5860.3320.5790.330
    5A OMPPEA0.022791.0070.3561.0030.358
    5A OMPPEA0.0021940.8830.2970.8790.301
    5A OMPIPA0.022970.9390.3060.9340.313
    5A OMPIPA0.0021850.9450.3350.9400.327
    5A Gad2PEA0.021060.8900.3400.8880.337
    5A Gad2PEA0.002840.8580.3460.8570.349
    5A Gad2IPA0.021190.9170.3650.9090.358
    5A Gad2IPA0.002620.8460.3490.8450.352
    5A DATPEA0.022160.9360.3860.9300.388
    5A DATPEA0.0021180.8500.3160.8530.311
    5A DATIPA0.021840.9260.3560.9280.361
    5A DATIPA0.0021230.8390.2950.8490.301
    5A Pcdh21PEA0.021991.1010.4121.0980.400
    5A Pcdh21PEA0.0021300.9750.4160.9690.393
    5A Pcdh21IPA0.022411.0830.3991.0880.396
    5A Pcdh21IPA0.0021761.0410.4071.0320.392
    6A OMPPEA0.022793.1141.6353.0991.597
    6A OMPPEA0.0021942.2440.9632.2480.979
    6A OMPIPA0.022973.0961.7413.1231.772
    6A OMPIPA0.0021852.4691.0782.4781.077
    6A Gad2PEA0.021065.9102.4355.8692.360
    6A Gad2PEA0.002844.3091.7124.3491.831
    6A Gad2IPA0.021196.4423.2176.2943.029
    6A Gad2IPA0.002624.6951.9824.6261.950
    6A DATPEA0.022165.8952.8665.8702.763
    6A DATPEA0.0021184.7392.4804.6932.312
    6A DATIPA0.021845.8512.8925.8772.991
    6A DATIPA0.0021234.2662.1744.2902.142
    6A Pcdh21PEA0.021997.5654.3357.5314.281
    6A Pcdh21PEA0.0021305.5062.3565.6012.302
    6A Pcdh21IPA0.022417.6104.3447.5764.301
    6A Pcdh21IPA0.0021765.5322.8585.4442.744
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Summary of statistical analyses

    FigureMiceOdorantConc, %NLower 95% CI, msUpper 95% CI, msMean, msSD, msp
    3B OMPPEA0.02279–9.61.2−4.245.90.130
    3B OMPPEA0.002194−6.05.0−0.538.80.853
    3B OMPIPA0.02297−9.31.7−3.848.20.172
    3B OMPIPA0.002185−8.83.1−2.841.00.346
    3B Gad2PEA0.02106−12.21.1−5.534.60.101
    3B Gad2PEA0.00284−10.85.7−2.538.20.542
    3B Gad2IPA0.02119−8.57.1−0.743.20.862
    3B Gad2IPA0.00262−13.07.4−2.840.10.582
    3B DATPEA0.02216−6.05.3−0.342.30.905
    3B DATPEA0.002118−7.77.90.142.70.983
    3B DATIPA0.02184−10.01.0−4.537.90.111
    3B DATIPA0.002123−13.10.8−6.238.90.080
    3B Pcdh21PEA0.02199−7.23.1−2.136.80.428
    3B Pcdh21PEA0.002130−12.72.4−5.143.60.182
    3B Pcdh21IPA0.02241−4.16.91.443.10.610
    3B Pcdh21IPA0.002176−10.81.9−4.442.40.166
    4B OMPPEA0.02279−2.115.86.976.10.133
    4B OMPPEA0.002194−3.518.87.678.70.178
    4B OMPIPA0.02297−2.611.94.763.60.207
    4B OMPIPA0.002185−3.714.55.462.70.245
    4B Gad2PEA0.02106−36.13.1−16.5101.70.098
    4B Gad2PEA0.00284−26.524.0−1.2116.20.922
    4B Gad2IPA0.02119−28.67.7−10.499.90.257
    4B Gad2IPA0.00262−16.930.06.692.30.577
    4B DATPEA0.02216−17.69.5−4.1100.70.555
    4B DATPEA0.002118−19.522.31.4114.50.893
    4B DATIPA0.02184−27.33.0−12.2103.50.116
    4B DATIPA0.002123−23.212.2−5.5100.50.541
    4B Pcdh21PEA0.02199−4.324.710.2103.70.165
    4B Pcdh21PEA0.002130−12.917.92.588.70.745
    4B Pcdh21IPA0.02241−10.020.25.1119.00.504
    4B Pcdh21IPA0.002176−5.820.87.589.20.267
    5B OMPPEA0.02279−5.112.33.674.20.419
    5B OMPPEA0.002194−8.615.23.383.90.583
    5B OMPIPA0.02297−4.214.25.080.80.289
    5B OMPIPA0.002185−8.316.44.185.30.517
    5B Gad2PEA0.02106−12.917.62.479.20.757
    5B Gad2PEA0.00284−15.518.31.477.80.867
    5B Gad2IPA0.02119−6.622.98.281.40.276
    5B Gad2IPA0.00262−15.518.31.466.60.869
    5B DATPEA0.02216−8.621.26.3111.00.407
    5B DATPEA0.002118−21.715.9−2.9103.10.757
    5B DATIPA0.02184−16.412.5−2.099.40.789
    5B DATIPA0.002123−27.86.3−10.795.50.215
    5B Pcdh21PEA0.02199−12.519.83.6115.70.659
    5B Pcdh21PEA0.002130−6.919.76.476.60.345
    5B Pcdh21IPA0.02241−16.55.7−5.488.20.337
    5B Pcdh21IPA0.002176−3.721.48.882.90.166
    6B OMPPEA0.022790.9981.0251.0120.1150.385
    6B OMPPEA0.0021940.9941.0341.0140.1420.864
    6B OMPIPA0.022970.9871.0161.0020.1270.274
    6B OMPIPA0.0021850.9851.0231.0040.1330.708
    6B Gad2PEA0.021060.9851.0441.0140.1730.629
    6B Gad2PEA0.002840.9821.0471.0140.1660.531
    6B Gad2IPA0.021190.9981.0561.0270.1810.077
    6B Gad2IPA0.002620.9941.0771.0350.1890.479
    6B DATPEA0.022160.9911.0281.0090.1500.646
    6B DATPEA0.0021180.9831.0391.0110.1670.472
    6B DATIPA0.021840.9851.0241.0050.1430.624
    6B DATIPA0.0021230.9791.0331.0060.1660.680
    6B Pcdh21PEA0.021990.9961.0411.0190.1780.648
    6B Pcdh21PEA0.0021300.9631.0200.9920.1800.216
    6B Pcdh21IPA0.022410.9971.0371.0170.1700.652
    6B Pcdh21IPA0.0021761.0031.0501.0260.1720.159
    7C PreOMPPEA0.022790.9841.0110.9980.1110.703
    7C PreOMPPEA0.0021940.9801.0160.9980.1290.834
    7C PreOMPIPA0.022970.9971.0261.0110.1280.135
    7C PreOMPIPA0.0021850.9921.0301.0110.1220.253
    7C PreGad2PEA0.021061.3001.4071.3540.2894.011 E–24
    7C PreGad2PEA0.002841.2701.3891.3300.2821.935 E–18
    7C PreGad2IPA0.021191.2961.4071.3510.3224.059 E–24
    7C PreGad2IPA0.002621.3041.4491.3760.3154.941 E–16
    7C PreDATPEA0.022161.2581.3231.2910.2453.173 E–43
    7C PreDATPEA0.0021181.2201.3041.2620.2308.205 E–23
    7C PreDATIPA0.021841.2221.2871.2550.2261.910 E–35
    7C PreDATIPA0.0021231.2011.3021.2510.2766.661 E–17
    7C PrePcdh21PEA0.021991.2641.3511.3080.3391.512 E–32
    7C PrePcdh21PEA0.0021301.2471.3471.2970.3001.512 E–22
    7C PrePcdh21IPA0.022411.2921.3571.3250.2736.790 E–55
    7C PrePcdh21IPA0.0021761.2811.3551.3180.2581.024 E–39
    7C OdorOMPPEA0.022790.9901.0211.0050.1310.492
    7C OdorOMPPEA0.0021940.9971.0321.0150.1280.104
    7C OdorOMPIPA0.022970.9881.0191.0040.1350.635
    7C OdorOMPIPA0.0021850.9841.0211.0020.1200.812
    7C OdorGad2PEA0.021061.4751.6301.5520.4151.008 E–26
    7C OdorGad2PEA0.002841.5061.6931.6000.4481.009 E–21
    7C OdorGad2IPA0.021191.5081.6701.5890.4697.588 E–29
    7C OdorGad2IPA0.002621.4911.6521.5710.3509.631 E–23
    7C OdorDATPEA0.022161.4051.4951.4500.3387.929 E–50
    7C OdorDATPEA0.0021181.4241.5641.4940.3821.060 E–26
    7C OdorDATIPA0.021841.4131.5221.4670.3822.147 E–39
    7C OdorDATIPA0.0021231.4071.5551.4810.4003.559 E–24
    7C OdorPcdh21PEA0.021991.4161.5071.4620.3515.482 E–53
    7C OdorPcdh21PEA0.0021301.4601.5951.5280.4056.719 E–32
    7C OdorPcdh21IPA0.022411.4351.5291.4820.3972.219 E–56
    7C OdorPcdh21IPA0.0021761.4641.5871.5260.4271.386 E–39
    7D OMPPEA0.025581.3471.4211.3840.4543.053 E–05
    7D OMPPEA0.0023881.4131.4961.4540.3940.017
    7D OMPIPA0.025941.3711.4341.4030.3889.829 E–14
    7D OMPIPA0.0023701.2751.3531.3140.3593.323 E–06
    7D Gad2PEA0.022121.3951.4841.4400.3401.917 E–04
    7D Gad2PEA0.0021681.4021.5141.4580.3841.931 E–04
    7D Gad2IPA0.022381.4041.4961.4500.3792.091 E–04
    7D Gad2IPA0.0021241.4151.5231.4690.3351.401 E–03
    7D DATPEA0.024321.3381.3931.3650.2928.842 E–06
    7D DATPEA0.0022361.3271.4031.3650.2954.632 E–05
    7D DATIPA0.023681.3191.3791.3490.2948.927 E–05
    7D DATIPA0.0022461.3071.3871.3470.3092.816 E–04
    7D Pcdh21PEA0.023981.3481.4091.3780.3398.010 E–03
    7D Pcdh21PEA0.0022601.3601.4411.4000.3445.501 E–03
    7D Pcdh21IPA0.024821.3631.4161.3900.3143.800 E–03
    7D Pcdh21IPA0.0023521.3691.4331.4010.3168.931 E–04

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data Figure 7-1

    Corrections for white-noise background in the power spectra. Representative power spectra of calcium signals from GCaMP-expressing OMP-Cre (A1), Gad2-Cre (A2), DAT-Cre (A3), and Pcdh21-Cre (A4) mice are presented. In each subpanel, the left and right columns represent the power spectra before and after correction for the white-noise background, respectively. The spectra in the upper and lower rows in the sub-panel are those from the prestimulation and the odor stimulation periods, respectively. The original plots in each mice (left columns in subpanels) are the same as those shown in Figure 7B. The background baseline was defined for each power spectrum as a mean value between 6 and 9 Hz. Then, these background values were subtracted from the original spectra. Download Figure 7-1, EPS file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct Comparison of Odor Responses of Homologous Glomeruli in the Medial and Lateral Maps of the Mouse Olfactory Bulb
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Direct Comparison of Odor Responses of Homologous Glomeruli in the Medial and Lateral Maps of the Mouse Olfactory Bulb
Tokiharu Sato, Ryota Homma, Shin Nagayama
eNeuro 23 January 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0449-19.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0449-19.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Direct Comparison of Odor Responses of Homologous Glomeruli in the Medial and Lateral Maps of the Mouse Olfactory Bulb
Tokiharu Sato, Ryota Homma, Shin Nagayama
eNeuro 23 January 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0449-19.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0449-19.2020
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • calcium imaging
  • Glomerulus
  • map
  • mouse
  • olfactory bulb
  • respiration

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Independent encoding of orientation and mean luminance by mouse visual cortex
  • Neck Vascular Biomechanical Dysfunction Precedes Brain Biochemical Alterations in a Murine Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
  • Alpha-2 Adrenergic Agonists Reduce Heavy Alcohol Drinking and Improve Cognitive Performance in Mice
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Independent encoding of orientation and mean luminance by mouse visual cortex
  • Different But Complementary Motor Functions Reveal an Asymmetric Recalibration of Upper Limb Bimanual Coordination
  • Serotonergic Suppression of Sustained Synaptic Responses in Rat Oculomotor Neural Integrator Networks
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.