Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Circuit and Cellular Mechanisms Facilitate the Transformation from Dense to Sparse Coding in the Insect Olfactory System

Rinaldo Betkiewicz, Benjamin Lindner and Martin P. Nawrot
eNeuro 4 March 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0305-18.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0305-18.2020
Rinaldo Betkiewicz
1Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
2Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany
3Department of Physics, Humboldt University Berlin, 12489 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Lindner
1Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
3Department of Physics, Humboldt University Berlin, 12489 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin P. Nawrot
1Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany
2Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin P. Nawrot
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Olfactory network model structure and odor response. A, Network structure resembles the insect olfactory pathway with three main processing stages. In each glomerulus (dashed circles), a PN (blue) and a LN receive convergent ORN input (red) by one receptor type (RT). Each LN provides unspecific lateral inhibition to all PNs. KCs (orange) receive on average 12 inputs from randomly chosen PNs. B, Receptor response profile (red bars, AL input) depicts the evoked firing rate for each ORN type. Evoked PN spike counts (dashed blue line, AL output) follow the ORN activation pattern. Raster plots depict single-trial responses of PNs (blue) and KCs (orange). Presentation of an odor during 1000 ms is indicated by the shaded area. Population (Pop.) firing rates were obtained by averaging over 50 trials. PN spikes display a temporal structure that includes evoked transient responses at stimulus onset and offset, and a pronounced inhibitory postodor response. The PN population rate was averaged over PNs showing on responses (blue) and off responses (cyan). KC spikes were temporally sparse with the majority of the spikes occurring at the stimulus onset. Extended Data Figure 1-1 and Extended Data Figure 1-2 show odor responses with adaptation disabled in the KC and PN population, respectively.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Lateral inhibition and cellular adaptation shape PN odor response dynamics. A, Single-trial PN spiking responses simulated with (right column) and without (left column) lateral inhibition, and with (bottom row) and without (top row) adaptation. Presentation of a single odor during 1000 ms is indicated by the shaded area. With adaptation, PNs display a temporal structure that includes a transient and a tonic response, and a pronounced inhibitory postodor response. B, Trial-averaged population firing rate: PNs driven by stimulation (blue) and remaining PNs (cyan). Bi–iv indicate the presence and absence of lateral inhibition and adaptation, as in A. In the presence of lateral inhibition, firing rates during stimulation are reduced. In the presence of lateral inhibition and adaptation (Aiv, Biv) PNs show either transient on responses (blue) or off responses (cyan). Aiv and Biv are reproduced in Figure 1B. Extended Data Figure 2-1 shows PN tuning profiles and input–output relation.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Odor response dynamics of the KC population. Figure layout is as in Figure 2. A, Single-trial population spike raster responses. B, Trial-averaged KC population firing rate. Numbers to the right indicate the fraction of activated KCs (na ) and the mean number of spikes per activated KC during stimulation (x¯ ). Without adaptation (Ai,ii, Bi,ii), KCs spike throughout stimulation because PN drive is strong and persistent. The fraction of activated KCs drops in the presence of lateral inhibition (Aii,iv, Bii,iv). With adaptation (Aiii,iv, Biii,iv), most of the KC spikes are confined to stimulus onset, indicating temporally sparse responses. We note that spontaneous KC activity is extremely low (0.03 Hz), which is in accordance with previous experimental results (Ito et al., 2008). Aiv and Biv are reproduced in Figure 1B.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Quantification of temporal and population sparseness in the KC population. Sparseness was measured in the absence (α = 0) and presence (α = 3) of lateral inhibition, and the presence (black bars) and absence (gray bars) of SFA. The sparseness measure was averaged over 50 trials. Error bars indicate SD. A value of 1 corresponds to maximally sparse responses. A, Adaptation promotes temporal sparseness. B, Lateral inhibition in the AL promotes KC population sparseness. Extended Data Figure 4-1 shows temporal sparseness when SFA was disabled in the PN or KC population, and population sparseness for different numbers of PN inputs per KC.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Lateral inhibition in the AL facilitates population sparseness and reduces pattern correlation in the MB. Spike counts (single trial) of 900 randomly selected KCs in response to two similar odors (“Odor A” and “Odor B”) arranged on a 30 × 30 grid in the absence (top row) and in the presence (bottom row) of lateral inhibition. Inactive KCs are shown in black. A, In the absence of lateral inhibition, KCs readily responded to both odors, resulting in an activation pattern where most KCs are active. In the presence of lateral inhibition both odors evoked sparse KC activation patterns. B, Superposition of responses to the two odors. KCs that were activated by both odors are indicated by hot colors (color bar denotes the spike count of the stronger response). KCs that were activated exclusively by one of the two odors are indicated in gray. The fraction of KCs that show overlapping responses is reduced in the presence of lateral inhibition. C, Pattern correlation between the single-trial responses in A to the two odors obtained for PN (blue) and KC (orange) spikes counts, in the absence (α = 0) and presence (α = 3) of lateral inhibition. Dashed line indicates pattern correlation of the input (ORNs). Pattern correlation was retained at the AL and was reduced at the MB level. Lateral inhibition in the AL reduced pattern correlation in KCs, but not in PNs.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Pattern correlation in the antennal lobe and the mushroom body depend on lateral inhibition strength α. The correlation coefficient ρAB between the response patterns to two similar odors was calculated and averaged over 50 trials and five network realizations for PNs (blue) and KCs (orange). Error bars indicate SD over trials and network realizations. Pattern correlation of the input is indicated by the dashed line. Input correlation is high because similar odors activate largely overlapping set of receptors. A, In the presence of adaptation, pattern correlation in PNs (blue) stays close to the input correlation for all values of lateral inhibition strength. In KCs (orange), the correlation decreases for small values of lateral inhibition strength and increases for large values of lateral inhibition strength. Pattern correlation in KCs is minimal for α = 3. B, In the absence of adaptation, pattern correlation decreases with the lateral inhibition strength both in PNs and KCs. The decrease is stronger in KCs. C, D, Pattern correlation ϱ̃AB was calculated based on evoked, trial-averaged spike counts in the presence (C) and absence (D) of lateral inhibition. The correlation coefficient between the trial-averaged response patterns to two similar odors was calculated and averaged over five network realizations. Error bars indicate SD over network realizations. In the presence of adaptation (C), the overlap between trial-averaged KC representations of two similar odors (orange) shows a minimum for intermediate strengths of lateral inhibition (1≤α≤3) . At the minimum, the KC overlap is below the overlap between trial-averaged PN representations. In the absence of adaptation, the overlap between trial-averaged KC representations is generally lower than the overlap between trial-averaged PN representations for all strengths of lateral inhibition. Extended Data Figure 6-1 and Extended Data Figure 6-2 show the mean fraction of activated KCs and the mean pairwise KC cross-correlation, respectively.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Decoding of odor identity indicates a prolonged and reliable odor information in KC adaptation currents. A, B, D, Decoding accuracy was calculated for nonoverlapping 50 ms time bins, based on a set of seven stimuli (chance level, ∼0.14) presented for 1 s (shaded area). Blue shading indicates SD obtained from a cross-validation procedure (see Materials and Methods). A, Decoding of odor identity from PN spike counts. Decoding accuracy peaks at odor onset and offset, and remains high after stimulation. B, Decoding of odor identity from KC spike counts. Decoding accuracy is above chance only in the first three bins following stimulus onset. C, Adaptation current amplitudes (single trial, hot colors in arbitrary units) of 100 selected KCs in response to “odor A” (top) and “odor B” (bottom). D, Decoding of odor identity from KC adaptation currents. Decoding accuracy peaks 150 ms after odor onset then drops during stimulation, but remains high and is sustained after odor offset.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Synaptic weights for wOL (ORN-LN), wOP (ORN-PN), wLP (LN-PN), and wPK (PN-KC) connections in different simulation conditions (i–iv)

    iiiiiiiv
    wOL 1 nS1 nS1 nS1 nS
    wOP 1 nS1.12 nS1 nS1.12 nS
    wLP 0 nS3 nS0 nS3 nS
    wPK 5 nS5 nS5 nS5 nS
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Parameters of the neuron model

    Neuron parameters
     Membrane capacitancecm 289.5 pF
     Leak conductancegL 28.95 nS
     Leak potentialEL −70 mV
     Reset potentialVR −70 mV
     Threshold potentialVT −57 mV
     Refractory timeτref 5 ms
    Synaptic parameters
     Base synaptic weightw0 1 nS
     PN-KC synaptic weightwPK 5 nS
     Excitatory synaptic potentialEE 0 mV
     Excitatory time constantτE 2 ms
     Inhibitory synaptic potentialEI −75 mV
     Inhibitory time constantτI 10 ms
    Adaptation parameters
     Spike-triggered current ΔIA 0.132 nA
     Adaptation time constantτA 389 ms
     Adaptation current variance σI2 87.1 pA2

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Figure 1-1

    Odor response with selective adaptation in the LN and the PN population. Strong phasic PN input elicits phasic KC responses. High KC firing threshold ensures sparse responses in the absence of SFA in the KC population. Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

  • Figure 1-2

    Odor response with selective adaptation in the LN and the KC population. The absence of SFA in the PN population was compensated by a constant current I0 = 0.38 nA. PNs show a constant population rate response with a slightly delayed onset due to inhibition by LNs. KCs show a strong onset population rate response and a nonzero tonic firing rate. Download Figure 1-2, TIF file.

  • Figure 2-1

    A, B, In the absence of adaptation (A, B), lateral inhibition (B) sharpens the PN tuning profile (blue). C, D, In the presence of adaptation, the PN tuning profile is not affected by lateral inhibition. The tuning profile was obtained by averaging PN firing rates during the 1 s stimulation window and across 50 trials. PNs receive input from ORNs of the corresponding type according to the receptor response profile. The receptor response profile (gray), rescaled between the minimum and maximum PN firing rates, is shown in all panels for comparison. The insets show the input–output relation between the ORN and the PN firing rates. Both averaged (blue line) and single-trial (gray crosses) PN firing rates are shown. Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.

  • Figure 4-1

    A, Temporal sparseness with SFA presence in selected populations. Black: PNs, LNs, and KCs. White dashed: LNs and KCs. White: LNs and PNs. Gray bars indicate simulation in the complete absence of SFA. B, Population sparseness depends on the mean number of PN inputs per KC k, both in the absence (α = 0, left) and presence (α = 3) of lateral inhibition. In comparison with the default number of PN inputs (k = 12, black bars), reducing the mean number of connections to k = 9 (white dashed bars) increased population sparseness, whereas increasing the mean number of connections to k = 15 (white bars) decreased population sparseness. The gray bar corresponds to k = 12 in the absence of SFA and is given for reference. Download Figure 4-1, TIF file.

  • Figure 6-1

    Mean fraction of activated KCs for different strengths of lateral inhibition. We obtained the fraction of activated KCs by counting KCs that have fired at least one spike during one of the given epochs: 1 s of stimulation, 1 s of spontaneous activity, and the first 50 ms after stimulus onset (transient response). A, In the presence of spike frequency adaptation the mean fraction of activated KCs during evoked activity (blue) shows a minimum for the intermediate strength of lateral inhibition. At the minimum, ∼10% of the KCs responded to the stimulus. This fits well with the experimentally reported values in the range of 5–11% (Turner et al., 2008; Honegger et al., 2011). B, In the absence of spike frequency adaptation, the mean fraction of activated KCs decreases with lateral inhibition during evoked activity (blue). Note that for α > 4 the fraction of responding KCs is close to zero or is zero. In the absence of spike frequency adaptation, and higher strengths of inhibition, KCs do not receive strong enough inputs to spike. Download Figure 6-1, TIF file.

  • Figure 6-2

    Mean pairwise PN cross-correlation for different strengths of lateral inhibition. For each PN, a vector obtained by binning the corresponding spike train into 50 ms windows was calculated. Pairwise correlation between the vectors was calculated and averaged over all PN pairs and 50 trials. Download Figure 6-2, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Circuit and Cellular Mechanisms Facilitate the Transformation from Dense to Sparse Coding in the Insect Olfactory System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Circuit and Cellular Mechanisms Facilitate the Transformation from Dense to Sparse Coding in the Insect Olfactory System
Rinaldo Betkiewicz, Benjamin Lindner, Martin P. Nawrot
eNeuro 4 March 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0305-18.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0305-18.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Circuit and Cellular Mechanisms Facilitate the Transformation from Dense to Sparse Coding in the Insect Olfactory System
Rinaldo Betkiewicz, Benjamin Lindner, Martin P. Nawrot
eNeuro 4 March 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0305-18.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0305-18.2020
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • efficient coding
  • lateral inhibition
  • odor trace
  • sensory processing
  • spike frequency adaptation
  • spiking neural network

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Characterization of the Tau Interactome in Human Brain Reveals Isoform-Dependent Interaction with 14-3-3 Family Proteins
  • The Mobility of Neurofilaments in Mature Myelinated Axons of Adult Mice
  • A Conserved Role for Stomatin Domain Genes in Olfactory Behavior
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Taste-odor association learning alters the dynamics of intra-oral odor responses in the posterior piriform cortex of awake rats
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.