Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Reduced TUBA1A Tubulin Causes Defects in Trafficking and Impaired Adult Motor Behavior

Georgia Buscaglia, Kyle R. Northington, Jeffrey K. Moore and Emily Anne Bates
eNeuro 17 March 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0045-20.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0045-20.2020
Georgia Buscaglia
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Georgia Buscaglia
Kyle R. Northington
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kyle R. Northington
Jeffrey K. Moore
2Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Anne Bates
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Changes in α-tubulin isotype expression in cortex (CTX) and spinal cord (SC) between post-natal day 0 (P0) and adult. A, Bar graphs representing relative quantity of TUBA1A mRNA in P0 (left) and adult (right) mouse cortex and spinal cord. B, Bar graph representing relative quantity of TUBA1B mRNA in cortex and spinal cord of P0 (left) and adult (right) mice. C, Bar graph representing relative quantity of TUBA4A mRNA in cortex and spinal cord of P0 (left) and adult (right) mice. D, Bar graphs representing the α-tubulin isotype mRNA expression data from A–C as a percentage of the total α-tubulin isotype composition. Three animals per genotype were analyzed for each time point, with three technical replicates per animal. Data are plotted as relative mRNA quantity normalized to housekeeping gene Cyclin A. Bars represent mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    α-Tubulin protein is decreased in P0 Tuba1aND/+ brains. A, Western blottings representing α-tubulin abundance in P0 (left) and adult (right) Tuba1aND/+ and wild-type (WT) mouse brains. B, Bar graph quantifying α-tubulin protein in P0 and adult brain tissue lysates relative to GAPDH (N = 3 mice, p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA). Quantifications are representative of at least three separate experiments. C, Western blottings showing the abundance of α-tubulin PTMs acetylation (top left), tyrosination (top right), detyrosination (center left), and polyglutamylation (center right), and total α-tubulin (bottom) in adult wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ whole-brain lysates. D, Bar graph quantification of Western blotting data shown in C. PTM band volume was normalized to α-tubulin (p > 0.05 for all by t test). E, F, mRNA expression of brain α-tubulin isotypes in Tuba1aND/+ and wild-type mice at P0. Data are plotted as fold change in Tuba1aND/+ relative to wild type (E) or as a percentage of the total α-tubulin isotype composition (F; p > 0.05 for all by two-way ANOVA). G, H, Bar graph representing mRNA expression of brain α-tubulin isotypes in adult Tuba1aND/+ and wild-type mice. Data are plotted as fold change in Tuba1aND/+ relative to wild type (G) or as a percentage of the total α-tubulin isotype composition (H; p > 0.05 for all by two-way ANOVA). All Western blotting data represents three replicate blots with lysates from at least three animals per genotype. Bars represent mean ± SEM. ****p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Reduced TUBA1A function results in fewer microtubule tracks in neurites. A, Schematic of experimental design, illustrating microtubule plus-end tracker, GFP-MACF43, puncta analysis and kymograph generation. B, Representative images of day in vitro (DIV) 1 wild-type (WT) and Tuba1aND/+ neurons, visualized using a membrane-bound Myr-TdTomato. Scale bars: 10 μm. C, Representative kymograph plots generated from GFP-MACF43 images in wild-type (left) and Tuba1aND/+ (right) neurons. Scale bars: 5 μm. D, Bar graph representing the number of GFP-MACF43 puncta per μm of neurite in DIV1 wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ cortical neurons. Bars illustrate mean density of GFP-MACF43 puncta per kymograph and error bars indicate SEM (n = 24 neurons, p < 0.0001). Statistical differences between groups were assessed by t test. ****p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Tuba1aND/+ neurons have deficits in organelle transport caused by increased stationary cargoes. A, Still images from time-lapse microscopy of DIV3 cortical neurons labeled with LysoTracker dye to mark lysosomes in wild-type (WT) and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. B, Representative kymograph plots of lysosome movement over time within select neurites for wild type (top) and Tuba1aND/+ (bottom). C, Scatter plot representing the percent of stationary lysosomes per kymograph in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. Data points represent individual neurons (N = 3 mice, n = 25 neurons, p = 0.001). D, Scatter plot representing lysosome velocities in μm/s for wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. Data points represent individual lysosomes (n = 635 lysosomes, p = 0.27). E, Scatter plot representing pause duration (s), for moving lysosomes in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. Data points represent individual pause events (n = 338 events, p = 0.56). F, Scatter plot representing total distance traveled (μm) by moving lysosomes in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. Data points represent individual lysosomes (n = 87, p = 0.003). G, Scatter plot representing the percentage of stationary mitochondria in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. Data points represent individual neurons (N = 3 mice, n = 30 neurons, p = 0.34 by). H, Scatter plot the velocity of short mitochondrial movements in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. Data points represent individual mitochondria (N = 3 mice, n = 301 mitochondria, p = 0.45). I, Scatter plot representing pause duration (s), for moving mitochondria in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. Data points represent individual pause events (n = 417 events, p = 0.79). J, Scatter plot representing total distance traveled (μm) by moving mitochondria in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. Data points represent individual mitochondria (n = 86, p = 0.01). Cortical neurons from three animals per genotype were analyzed. Lysosomes were imaged once every second for 3 min, mitochondria were imaged once every 2 s for 2 min. Statistical differences between groups were assessed by Student’s t test; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. In all plots, line designates mean with error bars indicating SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Tuba1aND/+ mice exhibit adult-onset motor and sensory behavioral deficits. A, Images depicting gait abnormalities in Tuba1aND/+ adult mice compared with wild-type (WT). Still images were taken from video of Tuba1aND/+ and wild-type mice mid-stride. B, Line graph quantifying changes in rear stance width at two months (p = 0.61), three months (p = 0.02), five months (p = 0.04), eight months (p = 0.03), and 10 months (p < 0.0001) of age in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice. C, Line graph representing latency to fall on rotarod task at two months (p = 0.31), three months (p = 0.82), five months (p = 0.03), eight months (p = 0.004), and 10 months (p = 0.04) of age in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice. Points depict the mean stance width or latency to fall by genotype with SEM. The same mice were analyzed throughout, and a two-way ANOVA was used to assess statistical significance between groups. Number of mice per genotype is as follows: N = 2 at two months, N = 5 at three months, N = 8 at five months, N = 12 at eight months, N = 8 at 10 months. D, Line graph representing performance over three subsequent rotarod trials in a single testing session at five months of age for Tuba1aND/+ compared with wild type. Slopes of the lines for wild type and Tuba1aND/+ were compared by linear regression and were not found to be significantly different (p = 0.32, wild-type R2 = 0.98, Tuba1aND/+ R2 = 0.89). E, Scatter plot of grip strength assessed in the forelimbs of female five-month-old wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 7, p = 0.19). F, Bar graph of total body weight for eight- to 10-month-old Tuba1aND/+ and wild-type female mice (N = 7, p = 0.24). G, Bar graph of SUDO scores Bonin et al. (2014) for Von Frey mechanical sensation testing in three- to six-month-old wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 7, p = 0.04). H, Bar graph of time to withdraw from thermal stimulus in Hargreaves behavioral analysis on three-month-old wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 7, p = 0.19). Sex as a variable did not significantly impact rear stance width or rotarod performance at any time point examined (N = 7 females, N = 5 males; p > 0.05 for all comparisons of male vs female). Sex was also not found to significantly influence sensory behavior (N = 7 males, N = 2 females; p > 0.05 for all comparisons); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. For line graphs, points indicate mean by genotype at each time point ± SEM. For Bar graphs, bars represent mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Tuba1aND/+ does not impact neuronal cell body survival. A, top row, Coronal sections of motor cortex immunolabeled with calbindin (green), ER81 (magenta), and DAPI (blue) in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice at three months (left) and 10 months (right) of age at 20× magnification. Center row, Sagittal sections of cerebellum labeled with calbindin (green) and DAPI (blue) in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice at three months (left) and 10 months (right) of age at 20× magnification. Bottom row, Nissl-stained coronal sections of the lumbar spinal cord in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice at three months (left) and 10 months (right) of age at 4× magnification. B, Scatter plot representing the number of ER81+ Layer V neurons per image in motor cortex at three and 10 months (N = 3 mice, p = 0.19 and p = 0.78, respectively). C, Scatter plot representing the number of calbindin+ Purkinje neurons per image in the cerebellum at three and 10 months (N = 3, p = 0.94 and p = 0.35, respectively). D, Scatter plot representing the number of Nissl+ ventral horn motor neurons per image in the spinal cord at three and 10 months (N = 3, p = 0.66 and p = 0.99, respectively). Motor neurons were identified morphologically. Data points represent ROIs with horizontal line depicting mean with SEM. Data points were nested by animal and analyzed by two-way ANOVA.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    No deficits in axon morphology, myelination, or survival in Tuba1aND/+ mice. A, Electron micrographs of spinal cord axons in cross-section for adult wild-type (left) and Tuba1aND/+ (right) mice. Six images per animal and two animals per genotype were assessed for EM analyses. B, Scatter plot displaying myelin thickness measure (G-ratio) for two wild-type and two Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 2 mice, n = 100 axons, p = 0.42). C, Scatter plot of axon density quantified in electron micrograph images for adult wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 2 mice, n = 6 fields, p = 0.72). D, Scatter plot of axon diameter quantified in electron micrograph images for adult wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 2 mice, n = 100 axons, p = 0.63). E, Histogram representing the distribution of axon diameters from data in D, F, Anti-SMI-32 (non-phosphorylated neurofilament) immunofluorescence images in cortex of adult wild-type (left) and Tuba1aND/+ mice (right); 40× magnification. Scale bar: 10 μm. G, Bar graph representing SMI-32 intensity in a cortical region of interest for wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice. Data points represent regions of interest, with three animals per genotype assessed (p = 0.77). H, Western blotting for SMI-32 in whole-brain lysates from adult wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice. Bands for heavy (200 kDa), medium (160 kDa), and light (125 kDa) chain non-phosphorylated neurofilament shown (top). GAPDH used for normalization (37 kDa; bottom). Data points represent technical replicates with three biological replicates performed. I, Bar graphs representing quantification of SMI-32 medium (right, p = 0.61) and heavy (left, p = 0.70) expression in whole-brain lysates, normalized to GAPDH. For all graphs, bar or line indicates mean and error bars display SEM.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Neuromuscular Junction (NMJ) synapses deteriorate over time in Tuba1aND/+ mice. A, Teased Extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle fibers labeled with α-bungarotoxin (cyan) and synaptophysin (magenta) for one-month-old (top) and one-year-old (bottom) wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice. Muscle fibers from three mice per genotype at each time point were assessed. B, Scatter plot of EDL synaptic (μm2) measured from α-bungarotoxin labeling in juvenile wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 3 mice, n = 69 synapses, p = 0.43). C, Scatter plot of postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) density measured as synaptic α-bungarotoxin intensity in arbitrary units (a.u.) divided by synaptic area in juvenile mice (N = 3 mice, n = 39 synapses, p = 0.89). D, Scatter plot of presynaptic vesicle density measured as synaptic synaptophysin intensity divided by synaptic area in juvenile mice (N = 3 mice, n = 39 synapses, p = 0.54). E, Scatter plot of the ratio of synaptophysin to AChR (presynaptic to postsynaptic) intensity in juvenile wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 3 mice, n = 39 synapses, p = 0.74). F, Scatter plot of EDL synaptic area measured from α-bungarotoxin labeling in adult wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 3 mice, n = 45 synapses, p < 0.0001). G, Scatter plot of postsynaptic AChR density measured as synaptic α-bungarotoxin intensity divided by synaptic area in adult mice (N = 3 mice, n = 45 synapses, p < 0.0001). H, Scatter plot of presynaptic vesicle density measured as synaptic synaptophysin intensity divided by synaptic area in adult mice (N = 3, n = 45, p < 0.0001). I, Scatter plot of the ratio of synaptophysin to AChR (presynaptic to postsynaptic) intensity in adult wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 3 mice, n = 45 synapses, p = 0.03). For all graphs, data points represent individual synapses with line representing mean of data ± SEM. Data were nested by animal and analyzed for statistical significance between genotypes by a two-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05; ****p < 0.0001.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Statistical table

    Data structureType of testPower
    1Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.4478 to 1.369
    2Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.03822 to 0.02562
    3Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–0.6247 to 0.1850
    4Normal distributionUnpaired t test–2.839 to 1.889
    5Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.5567 to 0.9367
    6Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.3997 to 0.3219
    7Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.5390 to 1.306
    8Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–1.079 to 1.932
    9Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–1.272 to 1.272
    10Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–0.5164 to 0.2583
    11Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–0.6096 to 0.6096
    12Normal distributionUnpaired t test–2.814 to –1.238
    13Normal distributionUnpaired t test1.294 to 26.44
    14Log-normal distributionWelch's t test–0.08284 to 0.02308
    15Log-normal distributionMann–Whitney U–0.5000 to 1.500 (approximate)
    16Normal distributionUnpaired t test–12.53 to –2.627
    17Normal distributionUnpaired t test–14.22 to 5.521
    18Log-normal distributionWelch's t test–0.06821 to 0.03392
    19Log-normal distributionMann–Whitney U0.5000 to 4.834 (approximate)
    20Normal distributionUnpaired t test–10.51 to –2.180
    21Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–0.6070 to –0.2015
    22Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA51.50 to 237.4
    23Normal distributionLinear regression–18.51 to 65.11 (WT); –53.22 to 83.22 (Tuba1aND)
    24Normal distributionUnpaired t test–6.520 to 1.782
    25Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.07948 to 0.3509
    26Normal distributionUnpaired t test0.1362 to 3.864
    27Normal distributionUnpaired t test–1.274 to 5.889
    28Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–111.3 to 17.97 (3 months); –83.08 to 46.19 (10 months)
    29Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–9.574 to 6.240 (3 months); –12.80 to 3.018 (10 months)
    30Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA–360.1 to 129.1 (3 months); –277.1 to 212.1 (10 months)
    31Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.03303 to 0.05303
    32Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.1935 to 0.1596
    33Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.5387 to 0.7019
    34Normal distributionUnpaired t test–608.3 to 741.8
    35Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.8969 to 1.449 (NFT-M); –2.403 to 3.450 (NFT-H)
    36Normal distributionUnpaired t test–113.7 to –37.30
    37Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.04520 to 0.08451 (pre); –0.1550 to 0.1791(post)
    38Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.1173 to 0.1639
    39Normal distributionUnpaired t test–116.1 to –56.69
    40Normal distributionUnpaired t test0.1642 to 0.3719
    41Normal distributionUnpaired t test0.1905 to 0.4305
    42Normal distributionUnpaired t test–0.3050 to –0.01338

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data Figure 2-1

    A, Tuba1aND/+ does not alter brain weight at birth. Scatter plot of brain weight for Tuba1aND/+ and wild-type mice at P0–P2 (N = 10 mice, p = 0.68 by t test). Weights were recorded from frozen, dissected brains. Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 4-1

    Tuba1aND/+ impairs mitochondrial transport by increasing pause duration. A, Still images from time-lapse microscopy of DIV3 cortical neurons labeled with MitoTracker dye to mark mitochondria in wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ neurons. B, Insets show representative kymograph plots of mitochondrial movement over time within select neurites for wild type (top) and Tuba1aND/+(bottom). Download Figure 4-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 5-1

    Tuba1aND/+ does not impact forelimb gait and specifically impacts rear stance width. A, Scatter plot of front stance width in five-month-old wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice. B, C, Scatter plot of forelimb (B) and hindlimb (C) stride length in five-month-old wild-type and Tuba1aND/+ mice (N = 8 mice, p > 0.05 for all by t test). Download Figure 5-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 6-1

    No evidence of apoptosis in Tuba1aND/+ cortex in young or old mice. A, TUNEL staining (green) with DAPI (blue) in wild-type (left) and Tuba1aND/+ (center) cortex, with DNase-treated positive control cortex (right). Sections from three-month-old (top) and 10-month-old (bottom) animals are shown. No evidence of increased apoptosis by genotype was detected at either time point. Download Figure 6-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reduced TUBA1A Tubulin Causes Defects in Trafficking and Impaired Adult Motor Behavior
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Reduced TUBA1A Tubulin Causes Defects in Trafficking and Impaired Adult Motor Behavior
Georgia Buscaglia, Kyle R. Northington, Jeffrey K. Moore, Emily Anne Bates
eNeuro 17 March 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0045-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0045-20.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Reduced TUBA1A Tubulin Causes Defects in Trafficking and Impaired Adult Motor Behavior
Georgia Buscaglia, Kyle R. Northington, Jeffrey K. Moore, Emily Anne Bates
eNeuro 17 March 2020, 7 (2) ENEURO.0045-20.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0045-20.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • ataxia
  • microtubule network
  • movement disorder
  • trafficking
  • TUBA1A
  • tubulin

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Similarities and Distinctions between Cortical Neural Substrates That Underlie Generation of Malevolent Creative Ideas
  • The Antiarrhythmic Drug Flecainide Enhances Aversion to HCl in Mice
  • Chemogenetic Perturbation of the Posterior But Not Anterior Cerebellum Reduces Voluntary Ethanol Consumption
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Chemogenetic Perturbation of the Posterior But Not Anterior Cerebellum Reduces Voluntary Ethanol Consumption
  • Energy expenditure homeostasis requires ErbB4, an obesity risk gene, in the paraventricular nucleus
  • In Utero Electroporated Neurons for Medium-Throughput Screening of Compounds Regulating Neuron Morphology
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.