Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleMethods/New Tools, Novel Tools and Methods

Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain

Kevin Takasaki, Reza Abbasi-Asl and Jack Waters
eNeuro 6 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0255-19.2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0255-19.2019
Kevin Takasaki
Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA 98109
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reza Abbasi-Asl
Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA 98109
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Waters
Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA 98109
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jack Waters
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Movies
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Contrast declines with depth with two-photon excitation. A, Example three-photon images from 300, 600, 900, 1100, and 1400 µm below the pial surface of visual cortex. Emx1-IRES-Cre;CaMK2a-tTA;Ai94 mouse. B, Comparison of images acquired from a single Emx1-IRES-Cre;CaMK2a-tTA;Ai94 mouse (different fields of view) using two-photon and three-photon excitation, focused 200–600 µm below the pial surface of visual cortex.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Implementation of near-simultaneous two-photon and three-photon excitation. A, Schematic of the optical layout for near-simultaneous two-photon and three-photon excitation; 1300-nm beam (black) passed a Pockels cell (PC), prism compressor, a collimating telescope, combining dichroic mirror (CD), x-y galvanometer pair (G), scan lens (SL), tube lens (TL), FF735-DI02 primary dichroic mirror (PD), and objective lens; 910-nm beam (red) passed a PC, beam expansion to ∼1 cm in diameter, electrically-tunable lens (ETL), 0.3× beam expansion before being reflected by the combining dichroic mirror onto the galvanometer pair. B, Scanning strategy for near-simultaneous two-photon and three-photon excitation. Red: 920-nm excitation, no 1300-nm excitation. Black: no 920-nm excitation, 1300-nm excitation. Gray: both lasers blocked. Lines were sorted into two-photon and three-photon images. C, Example images from 350 µm below the pia, with traces from two somata.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Changes in two-photon image quality and apparent ΔF with depth. A–D, Plots of image brightness (A), contrast (B), corrected motion (C), and ROI count (D) for two-photon (red) and three-photon excitation (black), plot as a function of depth below the pial surface of cortex. Mean ± SEM of three experiments from two Slc17a7-Cre;Ai162 mice. E, ROI match (percentage of three-photon ROIs also segmented from two-photon images) as a function of depth. F, Pearson correlation coefficient between two-photon and three-photon fluorescence traces, plot as a function of depth. G, Two-photon and three-photon changes in fluorescence to grating stimuli for two neurons, 350 and 500 µm below the pia. Each panel shows change in fluorescence (in arbitrary fluorescence units) through time during presentation of the drifting grating (icon to left indicates orientation and direction) for 2 s (gray bar). Eight individual traces and the mean (thick line) per direction. Dashed line indicates zero fluorescence. Below, Resulting direction tuning curve. H, Plots comparing preferred direction of neurons measured with two-photon (y-axis) and three-photon (x-axis) excitation, for each depth. Colors indicate percentages of the total number of neurons at each depth (zero is white, 10% is black, see color bar). Directions progress at 30° intervals from the low left corner of each plot (icons). J, Percentage of neurons with matching direction preferences measured with two-photon and three-photon excitation, from 200 to 650 µm. Dashed line: 8.3%.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    In-focus and out-of-focus fluorescence. A, Percentage of total fluorescence that originates from the focal plane, plot as a function of depth of the focal plane below the brain surface. Each point represents a single measurement (from a movie at one depth in one mouse). Lines are calculated from Equation 1 with scattering length constants of 200 µm (black) and 150 µm (gray). Dashed lines are relationships from the literature for scattering lengths constants of 200 µm: Equation 4 of Theer and Denk (2006) for two-photon excitation and Equation 7 of Xu and Webb (1996) for ballistic three-photon excitation. B, Plots showing the depth from which fluorescence originates with the focal plane at 200, 400, 600, and 800 µm below the brain surface. Fluorescence was calculated with Equation 1 and normalized to that in the focal plane. Note the difference in scale for two-photon and three-photon excitation. C, Breakdown of sources underlying the total fluorescence in panel B (Theer and Denk, 2006). Two-photon: 900-nm illumination, scattering length 200 µm (Eq. 1). Three-photon: 1300-nm illumination, scattering length 200 µm, equivalent formulation. Colors: fluorescence from ballistic incident photons (light green), from scattered photons (dark blue) and from a mixture of ballistic and scattered photons (cyan and deep green). Black: the sum of all fluorescence sources (reproduced in panel B).

Movies

  • Figures
  • Movie 1.

    Examples of simultaneous two-photon and three-photon image pairs at different depths. Examples of matched two-photon and three-photon movies 250, movies 450, and movies 650 μm below the pia. Two-photon and three-photon movie pairs were acquired pseudo-simultaneously. Each movie was acquired at a different illumination intensity and each was scaled differently for display purposes. Slc17a7-Cre;Ai162 mouse. Movies acquired at 8 Hz. Playback at 20 Hz.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 1
January/February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
Kevin Takasaki, Reza Abbasi-Asl, Jack Waters
eNeuro 6 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0255-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0255-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
Kevin Takasaki, Reza Abbasi-Asl, Jack Waters
eNeuro 6 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0255-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0255-19.2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cortex
  • 2-photon
  • 3-photon
  • multiphoton
  • fluorescence

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Methods/New Tools

  • Network States Classification based on Local Field Potential Recordings in the Awake Mouse Neocortex
  • A Toolbox of Criteria for Distinguishing Cajal–Retzius Cells from Other Neuronal Types in the Postnatal Mouse Hippocampus
Show more Methods/New Tools

Novel Tools and Methods

  • Network States Classification based on Local Field Potential Recordings in the Awake Mouse Neocortex
  • A Toolbox of Criteria for Distinguishing Cajal–Retzius Cells from Other Neuronal Types in the Postnatal Mouse Hippocampus
  • Development of Eight Wireless Automated Cages System with Two Lickometers Each for Rodents
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.