Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Function, Innervation, and Neurotransmitter Signaling in Mice Lacking Type-II Taste Cells

Eric D. Larson, Aurelie Vandenbeuch, Catherine B. Anderson and Sue C. Kinnamon
eNeuro 27 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0339-19.2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0339-19.2020
Eric D. Larson
1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045
2Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, Aurora, CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eric D. Larson
Aurelie Vandenbeuch
1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045
2Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, Aurora, CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine B. Anderson
1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045
2Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, Aurora, CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sue C. Kinnamon
1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045
2Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, Aurora, CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sue C. Kinnamon
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    RT-PCR confirms lack of Type II cell markers. RNA was extracted from fungiform and circumvallate taste buds of WT and Skn-1a-/- mice. After reverse transcription, cDNA was interrogated for the presence of Skn1a, Gnat3, Calhm1, and Snap25. Arrowheads denote ladder bands: Skn1a, 200 and 100 bp; Gnat3, 300 and 200 bp; Calhm1, 200 and 100 bp; Snap25, 300 and 200 bp. Data are representative of RNA extracted from three mice of each genotype; – is no template negative control, FF lanes in Skn1a and Gnat3 gel are RNA from C57bl/6j fungiform taste buds.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    IHC confirms lack of GNAT3- and PLCβ2-expressing Type II cells in Skn-1a-/- mice. A, Lingual sections from Skn-1a-/- and WT littermates were labeled with antibodies against SNAP25 (magenta) and GNAT3 (green) or PLCβ2 (green). In Skn-1a-/-, there was no detectable levels of Type II cell markers GNAT3 or PLCβ2. B, Semi-quantitative IHC reveals increased numbers of Type III cells in circumvallate, fungiform, and soft palate taste buds. Each dot represents a single taste bud. Box plots are summaries of all datapoints. Acquisition settings were equalized between WT and KO for all channels. Images are maximal z-projections of 12- to 16-μm image stacks. CV = circumvallate, FF = fungiform; *p < 0.05 by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn test for multiple comparisons.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Skn-1a-/- mice have suppressed responses to Type II-mediated taste modalities. A, Chorda tympani nerve activity of Skn-1a-/- and WT littermates was monitored in response to lingually applied taste solutions (100 mM NH4Cl, 500 mM sucrose, 10 mM quinine-HCl, 100 mM mono-sodium glutamate, 100 mM mono-sodium glutamate plus 0.5 mM inosine monophosphate, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM HCl, and 10 mM citric acid). Integrated nerve activity over 30 s of stimulation was normalized to baseline; N = 6 mice for each genotype. B, Baseline normalized chorda tympani activity of Skn-1a-/- mice in response to NaCl (30, 100, and 300 mM) with pre- and concurrent application of 100 μM amiloride. No significant differences were detected between WT and Skn-1a-/-. Bar charts indicate sample mean, error bars represent SEM, and superimposed dot plot represents each individual animal. ns = no significance; *p < 0.05 by two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    No change in the number of 5-HT3A-GFP geniculate ganglion neurons in Skn-1a-/- mice. Skn-1a-/- mice were crossed to 5-HT3A-GFP mice. A, B, Geniculate ganglia of Skn-1a-/-/5-HT3A-GFP and WT littermates (still expressing 5-HT3A-GFP) were labeled with antibodies against GFP (green), P2X3 (magenta), and SNAP25 (blue). The number of labeled cells was counted for each label. C, Percent of total cells showing GFP, P2X3, or SNAP25 immunoreactivity. KO of Skn-1a had no effect. D, Percent of total cells showing each combination of labels. KO of Skn-1a had no effect. Data are a summary of from three WT and four KO mice. Bar chart depicts sample mean and error bars show SEM.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    KO of Skn-1a does not affect responsiveness of geniculate ganglion neurons to ATP or 5-HT. Skn-1a-/- mice were crossed to 5-HT3A-GFP mice. A, B, Raw calcium imaging traces of isolated, individual GFP+ (green) or GFP- (black) geniculate ganglion neurons in response to 10 μM ATP, 10 μM 5-HT, or 55 mM KCl. C, D, Summary of responses to exogenous stimuli; N = 7 GFP+, 4 GFP- from 3 Skn-1a-/-/5-HT3A-GFP, and 6 GFP+ and 6 GFP- from 3 Skn-1aWT/5-HT3A-GFP. Bar charts indicate sample mean, error bars represent SEM, and superimposed dot plot represents each individual cell; *p <0.05 by Two-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    No change in the innervation density of taste buds in Skn-1a-/- mice. A, B, Lingual slices of Skn-1a-/- and WT littermates were labeled with antibodies against SNAP25 and P2X3. C. P2X3 immunoreactivity density was calculated for each taste bud. Dots represent individual taste buds and the box plot demonstrates distribution of data. CV, circumvallate; Fol, foliate; FF, fungiform; SP, soft palate. Data are from six WT and five Skn-1a-/- mice. No significant interactions were found by Kruskal–Wallis test.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    5-HT3A-GFP innervation in Skn-1a-/- mice. 5-HT3A-GFP mice were crossed with Skn-1a-/-. Skn-1a-/- mice that had the GFP transgene and WT littermates that also had the GFP transgene were used for experiments. A, B, Maximal z-projections of fungiform taste buds from WT and KO mice labeled with antibodies against GFP (green) and P2X3 (magenta). A’, B’, Same image as A, B but after prepressing which included Otsu thresholding. C, Analysis was performed on each optical plan of individual taste buds to quantify the relative immunoreactivity of P2X3 and GFP; *p < 0.05 by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn test for multiple comparisons. Three to four mice from each genotype were used, and 228 taste buds were quantified.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Purinergic receptor antagonism eliminates residual chorda tympani responses to lingually applied taste solutions. The chorda tympani response to taste solutions was measured in Skn-1a-/- before and after application of 1 mM AF353. Data are representative integrated responses to each stimulus. The y-axis scale is an order of magnitude smaller on the responses after AF353. Responses are representative of four animals.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    No detectable ATP release from taste buds of Skn-1a-/- mice. ATP release was measured from peeled circumvallate epithelium of Skn-1a-/- and WT littermates via luciferase assay. Stimuli were 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM citric acid, and artificial saliva. Data are presented relative to artificial saliva. Bar charts indicate sample mean relative to artificial saliva, error bars represent SEM, and superimposed dot plot represents each individual trial; *p < 0.05 compared with artificial saliva; ns = not significant compared with artificial saliva; N = 14 WT and N = 8 Skn-1a-/- mice.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    PCR primers

    GeneAccession numberPrimer sequence (5′ to 3’)Product size
    Calhm1NM_001081271F: GTGCTTTCTCTGTGCCTTCT
    R: CGTACCACGAACGCTAGTAATG
    240
    Skn1a (Pou2f3)NM_011139F: GGCGATGGGAAAGCTGTAT
    R: CTCCAAAGTCAGGCGTATGT
    249
    Gustducin (Gnat3)NM_001081143F: GCAACCACCTCCATTGTTCT
    R: AGAAGAGCCCACAGTCTTTGAG
    285
    Snap25NM_001355254F: GGCAATAATCAGGATGGAGTAG
    R: AGATTTAACCACTTCCCAGCA
    307
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    List of primary and secondary antisera

    AntiserumCompanyCatalog numberDilutionRRID
    Chicken polyclonal anti-GFPAves LabGFP-10201:2000AB_10000240
    Rabbit polyclonal anti-PLCβ2Santa Cruz BiotechnologySC-2061:1000AB_632197
    Goat polyclonal anti- GNAT3Aviva Systems BioNC95105981:500AB_10882823
    Rabbit polyclonal anti-P2X3AlomoneAPR-0161:500AB_2313760
    Goat polyclonal anti-SNAP25GenetexGTX895771:200AB_10724125
    Donkey anti-chicken 488Jackson ImmunoResearch703-546-1551:1000AB_2340375
    Donkey anti-rabbit 568InvitrogenA100421:1000AB_2534017
    Donkey anti-goat 647InvitrogenA11571:1000AB_2758603
    DAPIInvitrogen622481:10,000AB_2307445
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Statistical table

    FigureData structureType of testSample sizeStatistical data
    Figure 2BTwo-factors (genotype and taste field); data are countsKruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn test for multiple comparisonsWT mice: 6 mice
    CV: 110 buds
    FF: 19 buds
    SP: 15 buds
    KO mice: 6 mice
    CV: 125 buds
    FF: 16 buds
    SP: 17 buds
    χ2(5, N = 302) = 219.74, p < 0.0001
    CV_WT vs CV_KO: p < 0.0001
    FF_WT vs FF_KO: p = 0.0395
    SP_WT vs SP_KO: p = 0.00331
    Figure 3ATwo-factors (genotype and tastants); data are continuousTwo-way ANOVAWT mice: n = 6
    Skn-1a-/- mice: n = 6
    Genotype: F(1,91) = 12.755, p < 0.001
    Interaction: F(7,91) = 3.315, p = 0.004
    Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparisons test:
    KO/WT, NH4CL: p = 0.282
    KO/WT, Suc: p = 0.008
    KO/WT, Qui: p = 0.034
    KO/WT, Msg: p = 0.039
    KO/WT, NaCl: p = 0.008
    KO/WT, Msg+Imp: p = 0.007
    KO/WT, Hcl: p = 0.127
    KO/WT, Ca: p = 0.975
    Figure 3BTwo-factors (genotype and tastants)Two-way ANOVAWT mice: n = 5
    KO mice: n = 9
    Genotype: F(1,41) = 6.726, p = 0.014
    Interaction: F(2,41) = 0.976, p = 0.386
    Figure 4CCategoricalχ2WT cells: 3262 from 3 mice
    KO cells: 4236 from 4 mice
    χ2(2, N = 7498) = 5.312, p = 0.070
    Figure 4DCategoricalχ2WT cells: 3262 from 3 mice
    KO cells: 4236 from 4 mice
    χ2(3, N = 7498) = 5.064, p = 0.167
    Figure 5CTwo-factors (genotype and stimulus)Two-way ANOVAWT cells: 7
    KO cells: 6
    Genotype: F(1,38) = 0.0670, p = 0.797
    Interaction: F(2,38) = 0.0272, p = 0.973
    Figure 5DTwo-factors (genotype and stimulus)Two-way ANVOAWT cells: 4
    KO cells: 6
    Genotype F(1,29) = 0.0156, p = 0.902
    Interaction: F(2,29) = 0.409, p = 0.669
    Figure 6CTwo-factors (genotype and taste field)Kruskal–Wallis testWT taste buds: 166
    KO taste buds: 207
    χ2(7, N = 302) = 7.0057, p = 0.4283
    Figure 7CTwo-factors (genotype and taste field)Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn test for multiple comparisonsWT taste buds: 74
    KO taste buds: 154
    χ2(7, N = 302) = 57.047, p < 0.0001
    CV_WT vs CV_KO: p = 0.0181
    FOL_CV vs FOL_KO: p < 0.0135
    FF_WT vs FF_KO: p > 0.05
    SP_WT vs SP_KO: p > 0.05
    Figure 9Normal distributionPaired t test vs artificial salivaWT NaCl: 10
    WT CA: 9
    KO NaCl: 5
    KO CA: 8
    WT NaCl: t(9) = 2.363, p = 0.0424
    WT CA: t(8) = 2.697, p = 0.027
    KO NaCl: t(4) = 1.262, p = 0.275
    KO CA: t(7) = 0.473, p = 0.650
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 1
January/February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Function, Innervation, and Neurotransmitter Signaling in Mice Lacking Type-II Taste Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Function, Innervation, and Neurotransmitter Signaling in Mice Lacking Type-II Taste Cells
Eric D. Larson, Aurelie Vandenbeuch, Catherine B. Anderson, Sue C. Kinnamon
eNeuro 27 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0339-19.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0339-19.2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Function, Innervation, and Neurotransmitter Signaling in Mice Lacking Type-II Taste Cells
Eric D. Larson, Aurelie Vandenbeuch, Catherine B. Anderson, Sue C. Kinnamon
eNeuro 27 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0339-19.2020; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0339-19.2020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • ATP
  • innervation
  • Pou2f3
  • serotonin
  • Skn-1a
  • taste

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Capacity Limits Lead to Information Bottlenecks in Ongoing Rapid Motor Behaviors
  • Physiological Condition-Dependent Changes in Ciliary GPCR Localization in the Brain
  • Executive Control of Sequence Behavior in Pigeons Involves Two Distinct Brain Regions
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Taste-odor association learning alters the dynamics of intra-oral odor responses in the posterior piriform cortex of awake rats
  • Capacity Limits Lead to Information Bottlenecks in Ongoing Rapid Motor Behaviors
  • Contrast and luminance gain control in the macaque’s lateral geniculate nucleus
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.