Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Novel Tools and Methods

Optogenetic Control of Spine-Head JNK Reveals a Role in Dendritic Spine Regression

Patrik Hollos, Jismi M. John, Jukka V. Lehtonen and Eleanor T. Coffey
eNeuro 14 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0303-19.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0303-19.2019
Patrik Hollos
1Turku Bioscience, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku FI-20500, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jismi M. John
1Turku Bioscience, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku FI-20500, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jukka V. Lehtonen
2Biochemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Åbo FI-20500, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jukka V. Lehtonen
Eleanor T. Coffey
1Turku Bioscience, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku FI-20500, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Design and validation of the LOV2-JBD inhibitor. A, Schematic showing activation of LOV2 photo-domain from Avena sativa by light. The proposed mode of action of LOV2-JBD is shown in the lower panel where an 11-mer peptide inhibitor of JNK is released from the constrained conformation on photostimulation, facilitating binding to and inhibition of JNK. B, Constructs used in this study. C, Superimposed, top five lit-state model predictions for LOV2-JBD. In the top-ranked model, JIP1(11) (magenta) takes on a relaxed conformation projecting away from the core. D, JIP1(11) from the lit-state model (magenta) superimposed on the crystal structure of JIP1(11) from the JNK1-JIP1 co-crystal (green). E, mCherry-NES-Jun fluorescence provides a surrogate reporter of JNK activity in hippocampal neurons expressing mCherry-NES-Jun (control) or mCherry-NES-Jun with LOV2-JBD. Reporter activity is fluorescence intensity of phosphorylated c-Jun (P-Jun)/mCherry fluorescence intensity. Photostimulation of LOV2-JBD reduces JNK activity in hippocampal neurons; however (F) photostimulation of GFP-LOV2 does not. Data on dark-state and lit-state mutants are in Extended Data Figure 1-1. Mean data ± SEM and Student’s t test p values are shown. Cell numbers (from at least two experimental repeats) are indicated on the bars.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Photoactivation of LOV2-JBD reduces actin dynamics in dendritic spines. A, Hippocampal neurons expressing mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover FRET reporter provide a real-time readout of JNK activity. The mRuby2 image (left) indicates reporter expression and FRET image (right) indicates JNK activity, which is high in the cytoplasmic compartment. The look up table (LUT) shows FRET ratios (Fc) from 0 to 1. B, mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover FRET reporter activity from hippocampal neuron dendrites increases following JNK activation following anisomycin (10 μM) treatment. C, N-FRET shows that JNK is activated in dendrites and spines 40 min following anisomycin (10 μM). Mean data ± SEM are shown; p values are from Student’s t test. Extended Data Figure 2-1 shows mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover FRET has improved dynamic range compared to YPET-JNKAR1EV-CFP. D, Representative image of mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover FRET in dendritic spines. E, FRET images from live cell analysis indicate Flag-JBD inhibits JNK, as does LOV2-JBD following photostimulation for 30 s with 0.4 mW of 458-nm laser. F, Corrected FRET (Fc) from multiple experiments as described in E. Measurements were from five regions of interest per cell, from four cells from at least two experimental repeats. Mean data ± SEM are shown. Adjusted p values are shown from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Extended Data Figure 2-2 shows independent readout of JNK activity changed due to excitation of the FRET probe with 488-nm laser. G, GFP-actin displacement is shown in arithmetic difference projections (diff. proj.) depicting summed GFP-actin displacements from 11-min imaging. Darker pixels represent higher motility. Scale bar = 3 μm. H, Calculated motility index from several recordings as described in G. Flag-JBD and LOV2-JBD lit-state mutants significantly reduce spine motility. Mean data ± SEM are shown. Adjusted p values are shown from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction I, The minimal illumination required to photoactivate LOV2-JBD is shown. Motility changes from neurons expressing mCherry-actin plus LOV2-JBD and exposed to increasing 458-nm illlumination are shown; 0.4 mW (achieved using 3% laser power) was the minimum irradiance needed to elicit a maximal response. Motility was calculated from four to six spines per cell and two to three cells per condition from at least two experimental repeats.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Photoactivation of the LOV2-JBD inhibitor rapidly reduces actin motility in the peripheral domain of the spine. A, Time-lapse sequences from 16-d hippocampal neurons expressing mCherry-actin and LOV2-JBD variants. ROIs (blue squares) encompassing spine-heads were photostimulated for 1 s at 36 s using 0.4 mW of 458-nm light. Spine-head motility was reduced following light only in cells expressing LOV2-JBD. Additional examples are in Extended Data Figure 3-1A. B, Arithmetic difference projections of mCherry-actin before (pre) and after (post) 458-nm illumination of the spine (blue box). LOV2-JBD immobilized mCherry-actin in photoactivated spines only. Dendritic shaft mCherry-actin was unchanged. C, Quantitative data on mCherry actin motility. Mean data ± SEM are shown. Spine numbers are indicated on the bars. D, mCherry-actin motility changes are plotted according to spine head diameter:neck length ratio. Data from spines with head diameter:neck length ratios corresponding to “mushroom” spines is in Extended Data Figure 3-1B. E, Time-lapse of spine-head mCherry-actin motility shows LOV2-JBD immobilizes actin motility within 6 s of photoactivation. F, Light alone does not alter actin dynamics. For E-F, more than or equal to four spines were measured per cell. G, Color-coded time projections provide spatial information on mCherry-actin motility over 90-s recording. Photoactivation is at 0 s. Images are acquired at 6-s intervals and coded with a unique hue (LUT). Mixed color (white-ish) indicates continued motility over time. Blue indicates no further movement after that time point. LOV2-JBD-expressing neurons display reduced motility following light. H, Higher resolution maximum projections of temporally color-coded dendritic spines are shown from 10-s time lapses acquired at 1-s intervals. These show mCherry-actin is immobilized in the spine periphery. Additional examples with actin footprints and movies generated from the time lapses are in Extended Data Figure 3-1C–E. I, The effect of latrunculin and phalloidin on dendritic spine motility were tested. Arithmetic projection images before and after 458-nm light indicate effect on actin dynamics. J, Quantitative data from I indicate that latrunculin reduces actin motility. Measurements are from ≥10 cells and multiple spines from separate experiments. Mean data ± SEM are shown. K, Temporal color coding of spines from neurons treated with latrunculin or phalloidin are shown.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Corticosterone activates JNK and induces SEP-GluR2 removal and spine regression. A, Time-lapse recording of JNK activity in dendritic spines after corticosterone (CORT) application. Normalized Fc FRET is from six cells and more than or equal to four spines per cell. B, Representative FRET ratio images from mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover expressing cells. C, Representative images of time-lapse sequences (D, E) from 16-d hippocampal neurons expressing mCherry-actin (magenta), SEP-GluR2 (green), and LOV2-JBD. Cells were treated with CORT (100 nM) at 0 min, and LOV2-JBD was photoactivated using 458-nm 1-s light pulses (using 3% laser power, LSM-880 Airyscan) applied to ROI (blue boxes) at 3-min intervals where indicated (+458 nm), or in lower panels, after a 20 min delay. SEP-GluR2 was imaged using the 488-nm laser (0.8% laser power with LSM-880 Airyscan), to minimize cross-activation of LOV2-JBD. D, Quantitative data on cell surface SEP-GluR2 fluorescence is from eight experiments as depicted in C. E, Estimated spine-head volume is normalized to baseline volume, averaged over 3 min before treatment. Extended Data Figure 4-1 shows experiments repeated as in C–E with CORT treatment using YFP as an inert filler instead of mCherry-actin. Quantitative data are calculated from eight experiments. Mean data ± SEM are shown. Adjusted p values comparing full timelines are from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    NMDA activates spine-head JNK and induces retraction. A, Time lapse of JNK activity from mRuby2-JNKAR-1EV-Clover FRET reporter. ROI FRET (Fc) was measured from spines of 16-d hippocampal neurons before and after NMDA (20 μM). B, Representative FRET images before and after NMDA. C, The estimated spine-head volume from neurons expressing mCherry-actin and LOV2-JBD before (–3 min) or after treatment with NMDA are shown. Continuous photoactivation of LOV2-JBD was achieved using 1-s pulses of 458-nm laser (3% power) at 3-min intervals. LOV2-JBD photoactivation prevented NMDA-induced spine retraction. D, The experimental setup for anisomycin (10 μM) treatment and photoactivation timeline is shown. The “*” indicates time point at which JNK was activated. E, Neurons were treated with or without anisomycin and spine volume measured at 45 min (as described in D). Anisomycin induced spine retraction which was prevented by LOV2-JBD photoactivation. F, Mean data ± SEM from 20–24 spines/treatment is shown. Adjusted p values comparing full timelines are shown from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Ketamine inhibits JNK and prevents spine regression when given prophylactically, whereas JNK inhibition provides more robust rescue even 2 h after CORT. A, We tested the effect of ketamine (10 μM) on JNK activity in 16-d hippocampal neurons using the mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover FRET reporter. FC FRET responses in spine-head ROIs are from 7 separate experiments plotted individually; p values are shown from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Ketamine inhibited JNK activity, visible by 10 min postaddition. B, The effect was long lasting. Representative FRET ratio images show mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover JNK activity reporter FRET before and 2 h following ketamine. C, Representative images of 16-d hippocampal neurons expressing mCherry-actin (magenta), SEP-GluR2 (green) ± LOV2-JBD. Cells were stimulated with 100 nM corticosterone (CORT) or 10 μM ketamine (KET), as indicated. Blue boxes indicate ROI where 458-nm light was applied (1-s pulses at 3-min intervals) to photoactivate LOV2-JBD. D, Estimated spine volume changes were calculated from multiple images as shown in C, normalized to baseline. Eight cells, four spines per cell were used. E, Quantitative data of cell surface SEP-GluR2 (SEP-Glur2 fluorescence/mCherry-actin fluorescence) are shown from the same cells as in D. Measurements are from eight experiments. F, Dendritic spine volume changes were calculated from cells pretreated with 10 μM ketamine or 10 μM DJNKI-1 (to inhibit JNK) 2 h before addition of CORT (100 nM) for 2 h. G, Cell surface SEP-GluR2 levels (SEP-GluR2 fluorescence/mCherry-actin fluorescence) was measured from the same cells. H, Estimated spine volume changes were from more than or equal to eight experiments; 16-d neurons were treated with CORT (100 nM) for 2 h followed by KET (10 μM) or DJNKI-1 (10 μM). Estimated spine volume was measured and volume at 4 h was expressed relative to control. I, Cell surface GluR2 levels (SEP-GluR2/mCherry-actin) were calculated from the same cells. Mean data ± SEM are shown. Adjusted p values are shown from repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Extended Data Figure 1-1

    Testing functionality of LOV2-JBD tools in neurons expressing mCherry-NES-Jun as a JNK activity reporter. A, Fluorescent micrographs from 16-d hippocampal neurons expressing the mCherry-NES-Jun reporter in the presence or absence (control) of the dark-state and lit-state mutants of LOV2-JBD as indicated. Micrographs show ratio images of phospho-Ser63-c-Jun (P-Jun)/mCherry-NES-Jun (mCherry) fluorescence. Scale bar = 15 μm. B, JNK activity (from multiple experiments as shown in A) is the ratio of phosphorylated c-Jun normalized to mCherry-NES-Jun reporter expression. The “lit-state” mutant of LOV2-JBD reduced JNK activity even without photostimulation. The “dark-state” mutant did not significantly alter JNK activity even in the presence of light. Mean data ± SEM are shown; p values are shown from repeated measures one-way ANOVA and are indicated above the histogram bars. Total number of cells analyzed from at least two experimental repeats are indicated on the bars. Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 2-1

    mRuby2/Clover pairing improves JNK FRET reporter sensitivity. A, The sensitivity of FRET response was compared using the EYFP-JNKAR1EV-CFP FRET reporter and the newly generated mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover reporter. Reporter activity was measured in 16-d hippocampal neurons treated with anisomycin (10 μM). B, N-FRET was measured from multiple cells expressing both reporters. mRuby2-JNKAR1EV-Clover provided improved dynamic range compared to EYFP-JNKAR1EV-CFP (dendrite, p = 0.000167). Measurements were from five regions per cell and four cells per experiment on two separate experiments. Mean data ± SEM are shown. Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 2-2

    The 488-nm irradiation in neurons expressing LOV2-JBD partially inhibits JNK. Fluorescent micrographs from 16-d hippocampal neurons expressing mCherry-NES-Jun+LOV2-JBD in the presence, or absence of 488-nm irradiation mimicking Clover/FRET channel excitation (0.4 mW). Micrographs show ratio images of phospho-Ser63-c-Jun (P-Jun)/mCherry-NES-Jun (mCherry) fluorescence. Scale bar = 15 μm. B, JNK activity (from multiple experiments as shown in A) is the ratio of phosphorylated c-Jun normalized to mCherry-NES-Jun reporter expression. Mean data ± SEM are shown, p value is obtained by Student’s t test. Download Figure 2-2, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 3-1

    Photostimulation of LOV2-JBD in dendritic spines rapidly immobilizes spine-head actin in the peripheral domain. A, Time-lapse sequences from 16-d hippocampal neurons expressing mCherry-actin and LOV2-JBD variants as indicated. Cells were stimulated for 1 s with 0.4 mW of 458-nm light. B, The effect on spine motility of LOV2-JBD photoactivation in mushroom spines (head diameter:neck length ratio >3) is shown. Spine motility is measured from arithmetic difference projection ratios (motility after light/motility before light). Optical stimulation of mushroom spines did not alter mCherry-actin motility in spines even when laser power was increased to compensate for larger spine-head volume. At least six spines from four experimental repeats were measured for each condition. Mean data ± SEM are shown. C, High-resolution maximum projections show temporally color-coded dendritic spines from 10-s time lapse from 3D recordings using Airyscan mode, at 1-s intervals. D, Footprints of time lapse sequences are shown for color-coded time projections from cells expressing mCherry-actin with or without LOV2-JBD for spines shown in C. E, Movies generated from 3D Airyscan recordings (1-s interval) of dendritic spines of a cell expressing mCherry-actin with LOV2-JBD as shown in Movie 1: time lapse movie 0-movie 120 s, blue circle depicts ROI of 458-nm illumination. Movie 2, volumetric temporal color coding of a dendritic spine generated from 48 to 58 s with 1-s 458-nm illumination at 48 s. Download Figure 3-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 4-1

    Optogenetic inhibition of JNK recovers regressed spines and SEP-GluR2 induced by corticosterone. A, Time-lapse sequences from 16-d hippocampal neurons expressing eYFP-C1 (magenta), SEP-GluR2 (green), and LOV2-JBD. Cells were treated with 100 nM CORT at 0 min; 458-nm light pulses were applied every 3 min where indicated (+458 nm). B, Quantitative data show spine-head volume changes relative to baseline, calculated from six experiments. C. Quantitative data show plasma membrane SEP-GluR2 fluorescence normalized to YFP. Data are from six experiments as depicted in C. Adjusted p values (written on the graph) are from comparisons of full timelines from multiple experiments using repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Endpoint averages are also shown. Download Figure 4-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 1
January/February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optogenetic Control of Spine-Head JNK Reveals a Role in Dendritic Spine Regression
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Optogenetic Control of Spine-Head JNK Reveals a Role in Dendritic Spine Regression
Patrik Hollos, Jismi M. John, Jukka V. Lehtonen, Eleanor T. Coffey
eNeuro 14 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0303-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0303-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Optogenetic Control of Spine-Head JNK Reveals a Role in Dendritic Spine Regression
Patrik Hollos, Jismi M. John, Jukka V. Lehtonen, Eleanor T. Coffey
eNeuro 14 January 2020, 7 (1) ENEURO.0303-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0303-19.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • elimination
  • hippocampal neurons
  • kinase
  • optogenetics
  • spine
  • stress

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Novel Tools and Methods

  • Rhythms and Background (RnB): The Spectroscopy of Sleep Recordings
  • The Odor Delivery Optimization Research System (ODORS): An Open-Source Olfactometer for Behavioral Assessments in Tethered and Untethered Rodents
  • Development of a Modified Weight-Drop Apparatus for Closed-Skull, Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries in a Mouse Model
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.