Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Development

Retinoic Acid Is Required for Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cell Production and Differentiation in the Postnatal Mouse Corpus Callosum

Vivianne E. Morrison, Victoria N. Smith and Jeffrey K. Huang
eNeuro 26 December 2019, 7 (1) ENEURO.0270-19.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0270-19.2019
Vivianne E. Morrison
1Department of Biology and Center for Cell Reprogramming, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057
2Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria N. Smith
1Department of Biology and Center for Cell Reprogramming, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey K. Huang
1Department of Biology and Center for Cell Reprogramming, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057
2Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeffrey K. Huang
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Illustration of sample collection and sectioning. Representative slide with three coronal sections (left, sections A–C) that correspond to three regions along the rostral-caudal axis depicted on the sagittal diagram of the mouse brain (right, regions A–C). A color-coded key indicates which structures on the coronal and sagittal sections are corresponding. The slide on the left also shows three small boxes on each section that correspond to regions imaged and used for analysis. Right and left sides were counterbalanced as shown.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    NG2 and PDGFRβ immunofluorescence identifies different perivascular cell populations and OPCs. A, Immunofluorescence for NG2 (magenta) and PDGFRβ (green) in control CC (the area enclosed in the white dashed line) at P2. Co-localization in mural cells is seen in white. NG2+PDGFRβ- cells are OPCs (arrowheads). B, In addition to mural cells (white, chevrons) and OPCs (magenta, arrowhead), NG2 and PDGFRβ staining reveals NG2-PDGFRβ+ cells (green, thin arrow). C, Schematic illustrating the location of these three populations based on our observations. The three black arrows between the NSC and bipolar OPC, the bipolar and multipolar OPC, and the multipolar OPC and highly branched oligodendrocyte represent specification, maturation and differentiation, respectively, in the oligodendrocyte lineage. Scale bars: 50 μm (A) and 25 μm (B). Mn, meninges; CC, corpus callosum; ChP, choroid plexus; SVZ, subventricular zone; NSC, neural stem cell.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    RALDH2 expression in the postnatal forebrain of control and cKO mice. A, Coronal section illustrating regions imaged in panels C–E. B, RALDH2 (magenta) co-localizes with PDGFRβ (green) in the dorsal meninges and blood vessels, with a close up of RALDH2 staining in a PDGFRβ+ cell (arrowhead) and a PDGFRβ+ cell that does not express RALDH2 (chevron) in the cortex. C–E, RALDH2 co-localizes with PDGFRβ+ cells (arrowheads) in the midline meninges (C), CC (D), choroid plexus stroma (E). F, Coronal section illustrating the region imaged in G. G, Image indicating the midline meninges, CC (dotted line), SVZ (dense DAPI below dotted lines), and the regions seen in H, I. H, I, Raldh2 mRNA puncta are located in the midline meninges, blood vessels entering the brain parenchyma (arrowheads), and a large blood vessel (bright white vertically oriented ellipse in the lower portion of H). J, Coronal section illustrating regions imaged in panels L–N. K, RALDH2 (magenta) is undetectable in the dorsal meninges and parenchymal blood vessels of cKO mice, while PDGFRβ+ cells (green) are still present; inset shows close up of a PDGFRβ+RALDH2- cell in the cortex. L–N, RALDH2 staining is not present in the midline meninges (L), CC (M), or choroid plexus (N). O, Image indicating the midline meninges, CC, SVZ, and the regions seen in P, Q. P, Q, Raldh2 mRNA puncta (white) in the meninges, penetrating blood vessels (arrowhead), and a large blood vessel (thin arrow) are reduced by 76% compared to controls. R, Quantification of Raldh2 mRNA puncta per millimeter squared. Ctx, cortex; dMn, dorsal meninges; CC, corpus callosum; ChP, choroid plexus; SVZ, subventricular zone; LV, lateral ventricle; mMn, midline meninges; cKO, conditional knock-out. Scale bars: 200 μm (G, O), 100 μm (B, C, E, K, L, N), 25 μm (D, M), and 10 μm (H, I, P, Q). Floating bar plot, box: minimum to maximum value, line at median. ****p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    PDGFRβ+ cells and vasculature are normal in the Raldh2 cKO. A, PDGFRβ+ cells (green) co-localize with Laminin on blood vessels. B, Quantification of PDGFRβ+ structures. C, Quantification of Laminin+ structures. D, Percentage of Laminin+ structures co-localizing with PDGFRβ. E, F, Immunofluorescence for Laminin (magenta) and PDGFRβ (green), in the CC (area within the white dashed line) of control and cKO mice; co-localization shown in white. Mn, meninges; Ctx, cortex; CC, corpus callosum; SVZ, subventricular zone; LV, lateral ventricle; ChP, choroid plexus; Str, striatum; cKO, conditional knock-out. Scale bars: 50 μm (E, F) and 5 μm (A). Box and whiskers plot, box: 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers: minimum to maximum value, line at median.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Raldh2 cKO results in reduced numbers of OPCs and OLs. A, Coronal section illustrating the regions imaged in B, C, E, F, and M, N (top) and I, J (bottom). B, Control mice have abundant OL lineage cells (OLIG2, magenta; CC, dotted line) and OLIG2+ cell numbers remain stable throughout the first three weeks of postnatal life. C, cKO mice have significantly fewer OLIG2+ cells at all time points examined. D, Quantification of OLIG2+ cell number in control versus cKO mice at each time point. E, F, Control and cKO mice both have OPCs [co-labeled by PDGFRα (green) and OLIG2 (magenta)]. G, control and cKO mice have comparable total PDGFRα+OLIG2+ cell numbers at all time points except P14, when cKO mice have fewer, and while controls displayed at least a two-fold increase in OPCs between P2 and P14, the pool of OPCs in cKO mice did not expand over the same time period. H, More OLIG2+ cells are co-labeled with PDGFRα in cKO mice than controls. I, J, Control and cKO mice both have mature OLs [co-labeled by CC1 (green) and OLIG2 (magenta)]. K, cKO mice have reduced CC1+OLIG2+ cell numbers at P14 and P21. L, In cKO mice, fewer OLIG2+ cells are co-labeled with CC1 than in controls. M, N, Control mice have more PLP+ labeled area (green) than cKO mice at P14, P21, and P120; NF200 (magenta) labels axons. O, Quantification of reduced PLP labeling. CC, corpus callosum; Ctx, cortex; LV, lateral ventricle; SVZ, subventricular zone; Str, striatum; cKO, conditional knock-out. Scale bars: 100 μm (M, N) and 50 μm (B, C, E, F, I, J). Box and whisker plot, box: 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers: minimum to maximum value, line at median. Floating bar plot, box: minimum to maximum value, line at median. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. ns = not significant.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    NSC survival is reduced in the Raldh2 cKO. A, Coronal section illustrating the regions imaged in the other panels. B, C, Control and cKO mice both have proliferating PDGFRα+ cells (green) identified by co-labeling (white) with KI67 (magenta), and non-proliferating PDGFRα+ cells. D, E, Control and cKO mice have comparable numbers of total KI67+ cells and KI67+PDGFRα+ cells at all time points. F, Between P2 and P7 in control animals, the number of TUNEL+ cells dropped significantly. Between P2 and P7 in cKO mice, TUNEL+ cell numbers were unchanged. At P7 and P14, cKO mice had significantly more TUNEL+ cells than controls. G, H, Dying cells identified by labeling with TUNEL (green, thin arrow) were present in the CC and SVZ (delineated by dotted lines) of both controls and cKO, though no OLIG2+ cells were co-labeled with TUNEL. I, In the cKO SVZ, 76% of all TUNEL+ cells were co-labeled by Nestin [magenta, co-labeled cells are white (thin arrow)]. J, K, Immunofluorescence for IBA1+ in the CC of control and cKO mice. L, Quantification of the number of IBA1+ cells shows no significant difference between groups; a transient increase in IBA1+ cells appears at P7 in cKO mice but does not reach significance. CC, corpus callosum; SVZ, subventricular zone; LV, lateral ventricle; cKO, conditional knock-out. Scale bars: 50 μm (B, C, G, H, J, K) and 25 μm (I). Box and whisker plot, box: 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers: minimum to maximum value, line at median. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. ns = not significant.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Gli1 expression is reduced in the SVZ in Raldh2 cKO mice. A, Coronal section illustrating the region imaged in B, C. B, C, In controls and cKO mice, Gli1 mRNA puncta (white) are found in the SVZ (delineated by dotted lines) and the transition from the SVZ into the CC (area flanking the top dotted line in B, C). D, The total number of Gli1 puncta in the SVZ and its border with the CC is reduced in cKO at P2 relative to controls. E, The number of Gli1 mRNA puncta per cell is reduced in cKO mice. F, G, Gli1+Olig2+-co-labeled cells (white and magenta) cells are found at the border between the SVZ and CC in controls and cKO. H, The number of Gli1+Olig2+ cells is reduced in cKO mice. CC, corpus callosum; SVZ, subventricular zone; LV, lateral ventricle; cKO, conditional knock-out. Scale bars: 50 μm (B, C) and 5 μm (F, G). Box and whisker plot, box: 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers: minimum to maximum value, line at median. Floating bar plot, box: minimum to maximum value, line at median. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Other NSC-derived cell types are reduced by loss of RALDH2. A, B, Control and cKO mice both have GFAP+ expression in the CC (dotted lines). OLIG2 marks OL lineage cells and is included to provide contrast. C, The area of CC that is labeled by GFAP is significantly reduced in cKO mice relative to controls at all time points examined. D, Coronal section illustrating the regions imaged in E, F, H, I, L, M. E–G, cKO mice have significantly more SATB2+ neurons (green) than controls. H, I, cKO mice have significantly fewer layer 6 (TBR1, magenta) and layer 5 (CTIP2, green) neurons than control mice at P2. J, Quantification of CTIP2+ cell reduction in cKO mice. K, Quantification of TBR1+ cell reduction in cKO mice. L, M, Cortical thickness is reduced in cKO mice. N, Quantification of cortical thickness. CC, corpus callosum; LV, lateral ventricle; Ctx, cortex (with layers 1–6 in roman numerals); SVZ, subventricular zone; Mn, meninges; cKO, conditional knock-out. Scale bars: 200 μm (L, M), 100 μm (A, B), 50 μm (H, I), and 25 μm (E, F). Box and whisker plot, box: 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers: minimum to maximum value, line at median. Floating bar plot, box: minimum to maximum value, line at median. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Statistical summary

    IdentifierShapiro–Wilk
    (α = 0.05)
    Test95% CI
    aNormalRaldh2 mRNA puncta/mm; unpaired t test between genotypes at P2, one-tailed–2521 to –1732
    bNormalPDGFRβ+ structures/mm2; unpaired t test between genotypes at P14, two-tailed–42.62 to 16.82
    cNormalLaminin+ structures/mm2; unpaired t test between genotypes at P14, two-tailed–94.79 to 21.25
    dNormalPDGFRβ+Laminin+/Laminin+ structures %, unpaired t test between genotypes at P14, two-tailed–2.765 to 21.69
    eNormalOLIG2+ cells/mm2; one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test between genotypes at individual time points
    P24.080 to 494.0
    P780.47 to 547.6
    P14126.6 to 593.7
    P21108.9 to 681.0
    fNormalOLIG2+ cells/mm2; unpaired t test within control genotype between individual time points P2 vs P21, one-tailed–441.0 to 282.2
    gNormalOLIG2+ cells/mm2; unpaired t test within cKO genotype between individual time points P2 vs P21, one-tailed–490.0 to 39.44
    hNormalPDGFRα+OLIG2+ cells/mm2; one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons between genotypes at individual time points
    iNormalPDGFRα+OLIG2+ cells/mm2; one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons within control genotype at individual time points
    P2 vs P7–121.2 to 55.21
    P7 vs P14–184.2 to –16.61
    P14 vs P218.089 to 221.1
    P2 vs P21–224.6 to –42.19
    jNormalPDGFRα+OLIG2+/OLIG2+ cells/mm2; one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons between genotypes at individual time points
    P2–26.25 to –9.080
    P7–21.13 to –3.288
    P14–20.19 to –1.376
    P21–12.09 to 6.720
    kNormalCC1+OLIG2+ cells/mm2; one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons between genotypes at individual time points
    P7–21.38 to 87.30
    P1432.72 to 141.4
    P2149.38 to 158.1
    lNormalCC1+OLIG2+ cells/OLIG2+ cells %; one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons between genotypes at individual time points
    P142.156 to 20.30
    P211.024 to 19.16
    mNormalPLP+ area (mm2); one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons between genotypes at individual time points
    P7–18.20 to 107.8
    P1430.06 to 138.5
    P2125.44 to 139.2
    P12069.15 to 211.4
    nNormalTUNEL+ cells/mm2; unpaired t test within control genotype between individual time points P2 vs P7, one-tailed–41.86 to –15.94
    oNormalTUNEL+ cells/mm2; unpaired t test within cKO genotype between individual time points P2 vs P7, one-tailed–18.13 to 4.871
    pNormalTUNEL+ cells/mm2; one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons between genotypes at individual time points
    P2–9.109 to 16.03
    P7–30.05 to –7.565
    P140.9951 to 10.17
    qNormalIBA1+ cells/mm2 one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons between genotypes at individual time points
    P7–46.17 to 51.34
    P14–92.57 to 4.941
    P21–37.76 to 67.56
    rNormalGli1 mRNA puncta/mm2; unpaired t test between genotypes at P2, one-tailed–15,405 to –2876
    sNormalGli1 mRNA puncta/cell; n= number of cells, unpaired t test between genotypes at P2, one-tailed–3.692 to –1.703
    tNormalGli1+Olig2+ cells/mm2; unpaired t test between genotypes at P2, one-tailed–53.01 to –33.57
    uNormalÄGFAP+ area (mm2); one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons between genotypes at individual time points
    P20.8137 to 7.880
    P74.695 to 12.44
    P146.558 to 14.30
    P213.638 to 11.38
    vNormalSATB2+ cells/mm2; unpaired t test between genotypes at P2, one-tailed159.9 to 1991
    wNormalCTIP2+ cells/mm2; unpaired t test between genotypes at P2, two-tailed–172.6 to –68.02
    xNormalTBR1+ cells/mm2; unpaired t test between genotypes at P2, two-tailed–1407 to –439.5
    yNormalCortical thickness (um); unpaired t test between genotypes at P2, two-tailed–234.6 to 26.12
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 7 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 7, Issue 1
January/February 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Retinoic Acid Is Required for Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cell Production and Differentiation in the Postnatal Mouse Corpus Callosum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Retinoic Acid Is Required for Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cell Production and Differentiation in the Postnatal Mouse Corpus Callosum
Vivianne E. Morrison, Victoria N. Smith, Jeffrey K. Huang
eNeuro 26 December 2019, 7 (1) ENEURO.0270-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0270-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Retinoic Acid Is Required for Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cell Production and Differentiation in the Postnatal Mouse Corpus Callosum
Vivianne E. Morrison, Victoria N. Smith, Jeffrey K. Huang
eNeuro 26 December 2019, 7 (1) ENEURO.0270-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0270-19.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • meninges
  • oligodendrocyte precursor cells
  • oligodendrocytes
  • postnatal
  • retinoic acid
  • subcortical white matter

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Development

  • Absence of testes at puberty impacts functional development of nigrostriatal but not mesoaccumbal dopamine terminals in a wild-derived mouse
  • Anxiety-Associated Behaviors Following Ablation of Miro1 from Cortical Excitatory Neurons
  • Nicotinic Modulation of Fast-Spiking Neurons in Rat Somatosensory Cortex across Development
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.