Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Cognition and Behavior

Cognitive Flexibility Improves Memory for Delayed Intentions

Seth R. Koslov, Arjun Mukerji, Katlyn R. Hedgpeth and Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock
eNeuro 10 October 2019, 6 (6) ENEURO.0250-19.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0250-19.2019
Seth R. Koslov
1Department of Psychology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arjun Mukerji
3Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katlyn R. Hedgpeth
1Department of Psychology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock
1Department of Psychology
2Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

DOI 
https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0250-19.2019
PubMed 
31601634
Published By 
Society for Neuroscience
History 
  • Received June 27, 2019
  • Revision received September 7, 2019
  • Accepted September 26, 2019
  • Published online October 10, 2019.
Copyright & Usage 
Copyright © 2019 Koslov et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Author Information

  1. Seth R. Koslov1,
  2. Arjun Mukerji3,
  3. Katlyn R. Hedgpeth1 and
  4. Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock1,2
  1. 1Department of Psychology
  2. 2Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
  3. 3Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  1. Correspondence should be addressed to Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock at Jalewpea{at}utexas.edu.
View Full Text

Author contributions

  1. Author contributions: S.R.K., A.M., and J.A.L.-P. designed research; S.R.K. and K.R.H. performed research; S.R.K., A.M., K.R.H., and J.A.L.-P. analyzed data; S.R.K., K.R.H., and J.A.L.-P. wrote the paper.

Disclosures

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by funds from the University of Texas System STARs Program, a UT BRAIN Seed Grant Award, and National Institutes of Health Grant R01-EY-028746 awarded to J.A.L.-P.

Funding

  • University of Texas System (UT)

    STARS program; UT BRAIN seed grant
  • HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI)

    R01 EY028746

Other Version

  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
  • previous version (October 10, 2019).

Online Impact

 

Article usage

Select a custom date range for the past year
E.g., 2026-01-13
to
E.g., 2026-01-13

Article usage: October 2019 to January 2026

AbstractFullPdf
Oct 20193690104
Nov 201918223269
Dec 2019607731
Total 2019611309204
Jan 2020395126
Feb 2020235938
Mar 2020114412
May 2020104123
Jun 2020103417
Jul 202043717
Aug 202042711
Sep 202098417
Oct 202027113
Nov 20205569
Dec 2020811029
Total 2020125614212
Jan 202168816
Feb 202126916
Mar 202187919
Apr 202135810
May 202116924
Jun 202116521
Jul 202125121
Aug 202125415
Sep 202125722
Oct 202146922
Nov 202104721
Dec 20211607
Total 202132766214
Jan 202226925
Feb 202242915
Mar 202204015
Apr 202214418
May 202226818
Jun 202216816
Jul 202203114
Aug 20224263
Sep 20222259
Oct 202232716
Nov 20223304
Dec 202204115
Total 202222498168
Jan 202333720
Feb 20230308
Mar 20230346
Apr 202314422
May 20230358
Jun 202314219
Jul 202334314
Aug 202334527
Sep 202324618
Oct 202346517
Nov 202344615
Dec 202355918
Total 202326526192
Jan 202464410
Feb 2024364317
Mar 202455524
Apr 2024642524
May 202416625
Jun 202410518
Jul 202434823
Aug 2024105411
Sep 202465120
Oct 202434418
Nov 202445015
Dec 202494923
Total 202499980218
Jan 202577823
Feb 202527017
Mar 2025144825
Apr 202535014
May 2025108224
Jun 202588332
Jul 2025107934
Aug 202565632
Sep 20251518228
Oct 20251410536
Nov 20252110349
Dec 20251310139
Total 20251231037353
Jan 20265315
Total 20265315
Total104347611566
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 6 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 6, Issue 6
November/December 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cognitive Flexibility Improves Memory for Delayed Intentions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Cognitive Flexibility Improves Memory for Delayed Intentions
Seth R. Koslov, Arjun Mukerji, Katlyn R. Hedgpeth, Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock
eNeuro 10 October 2019, 6 (6) ENEURO.0250-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0250-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Cognitive Flexibility Improves Memory for Delayed Intentions
Seth R. Koslov, Arjun Mukerji, Katlyn R. Hedgpeth, Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock
eNeuro 10 October 2019, 6 (6) ENEURO.0250-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0250-19.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cognitive control
  • cognitive flexibility
  • fMRI
  • MVPA
  • prospective memory
  • working memory

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Neck Vascular Biomechanical Dysfunction Precedes Brain Biochemical Alterations in a Murine Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
  • Spontaneous oscillatory activity in episodic timing: an EEG replication study and its limitations
  • Neural signatures of engagement and event segmentation during story listening in background noise
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.