Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Novel Tools and Methods

A Novel Birthdate-Labeling Method Reveals Segregated Parallel Projections of Mitral and External Tufted Cells in the Main Olfactory System

Tatsumi Hirata, Go Shioi, Takaya Abe, Hiroshi Kiyonari, Shigeki Kato, Kazuto Kobayashi, Kensaku Mori and Takahiko Kawasaki
eNeuro 31 October 2019, 6 (6) ENEURO.0234-19.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0234-19.2019
Tatsumi Hirata
1Brain Function Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics
2Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Mishima 411-8540, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tatsumi Hirata
Go Shioi
3Laboratory for Genetic Engineering, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takaya Abe
3Laboratory for Genetic Engineering, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
4Laboratory for Animal Resource Development, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Kiyonari
3Laboratory for Genetic Engineering, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
4Laboratory for Animal Resource Development, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigeki Kato
5Department of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuto Kobayashi
5Department of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kensaku Mori
6Department of Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kensaku Mori
Takahiko Kawasaki
1Brain Function Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics
2Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Mishima 411-8540, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Birthdate tagging of OB projection neurons. A, The experimental design of the birthdate tag method. The horizontal axis indicates the developmental time course. Individual neurons express CreER only transiently, soon after birth. An injection of TM at a certain developmental time point induces Cre-loxP recombination only in neurons expressing CreER. B, Schematized gene structures of the birthdate tag driver Neurog2CreER(G2A) and TaumGFP-nLacZ reporter used in this figure. C, Proportion of EdU-incorporated cells in birthdate-tagged neurons shown by Cumming estimation plot. TM was given at a fixed time point at E12.5, and EdU was given at the indicated time before the TM injection. The raw values calculated from individual mice and mean ± SD are plotted on the upper axis. On the lower axis, mean differences from the 24-h group are plotted as bootstrap sampling distributions. Each mean difference is depicted as a dot. Each 95% confidence interval is indicated by the ends of the vertical error bars. D, The number of birthdate-tagged neuron subtypes counted in OB sections prepared from P14 Neurog2CreER(G2A); TaumGFP-nLacZ mice that were given TM at different embryonic stages. The cell numbers are normalized by the layer distance used for cell counting. The color intensity coded columns show the means of tagged-cell numbers at individual TM injection stages. Black bars show the raw values obtained from individual mice (n = 3 for each TM stage). E, F, Immunostaining of MOB sections prepared from P14.5 Neurog2CreER(G2A); TaumGFP-nLacZ mice for nucleus-localized β-gal (E) and membrane-bound GFP (F) reporters. TM was administrated at different embryonic stages as indicated at the top. Arrowheads (E, F) indicate reporter-tagged cell bodies, and arrows (F) indicate the position of reporter-tagged dendrites in the EPL. Asterisks (F) show the reporter-labeled internal plexiform layer that contains intrabulbar association fibers. Scale bar = 100 μm. GRL: granule cell layer. G, Proportion of the neuron subtypes birthdate tagged at different TM stages in the whole OB. The proportions were calculated without normalization by the tissue size, and therefore AOB neurons may look underrepresented compared with D, reflecting the small size of AOB. The diameter of each pie chart is proportional to the number of neurons. The exact numbers of neurons counted are shown in Extended Data Figure 1-1.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Characterization of birthdate-tagged neurons in the MOB. A, B, Distribution of birthdate-tagged MCs (A) and eTCs (B) in different OB sectors. The numbers of MCs and eTCs are counted from the rostral, dorsal, lateral, medial and ventral sectors of MOBs prepared from P14 Neurog2CreER(G2A); TaumGFP-nLacZ mice that were given TM injection at the embryonic stages indicated at the bottom. Black bars indicate the raw values obtained from individual mice (n = 3 for each category), and colored columns represent the means. C–F, Expression of neuron subtype markers in β-gal reporter-labeled (green) neurons that were tagged at TM12.5 (C), TM13.5 (D), TM15.5 (E), and TM17.5 (F) in P14.5 Neurog2CreER(G2A); TaumGFP-nLacZ MOBs. Red staining shows TBR2 (projection neuron marker), cholecystokinin (projection neuron marker), calretinin (periglomerular cell marker), tyrosine hydroxylase (interneuron marker) and calbindin (periglomerular cell marker) from left to right. DAPI (blue) staining is superimposed in all panels. The filled white arrowheads indicate marker-positive birthdate-tagged neurons, and the open arrowheads indicate marker-negative birthdate-tagged neurons. The percentage of marker-positive in β-gal-positive neurons is shown on the right top corner in each panel. The percentage is not shown when no marker-positive cells were found in β-gal-positive birthdate-tagged neurons. The positions of MOB layers are indicated on the right-hand end. Scale bar = 50 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Birthdate tagging of OB projection neurons using OB-specific reporters. The birthdate-tagged projection neuron subtypes were counted in OB sections prepared from P14 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; TREtdTomato-sypGFP (A, B) and P14–P15 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; ROSA26-TREmGFP (C, D) mice that had been given TM injection at different embryonic stages. A, C, The color intensity coded columns show the means of tagged cell numbers at individual TM injection stages. Black bars depict the raw values obtained from individual mice (n = 3 for each TM stage). The cell numbers are normalized by the layer distance used for cell counting. B, D, Proportion of neuron subtypes birthdate tagged at different TM stages in the whole OB. The proportions were calculated without normalization by the tissue size, and therefore may look slightly different from the quantifications in A, C. The diameter of each pie chart reflects the number of neurons. The exact numbers of neurons counted are shown in Extended Data Figure 3-1.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Birthdate tagging at TM10.5. A–F, Coronal brain sections prepared from a P22 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; TREtdTomato-sypGFP mouse that was given TM injection at E10.5. Images for tdTomato reporter (red) and DAPI (blue). Medial is to the left and dorsal is to the top. The TM10.5 tagging selectively labels AOB projection neurons (A, arrowheads in A’). Their axons run in the deep dorsal side of the LOT (arrowheads in B, C) and project to the AOB-specific targets (D–F). Asterisks indicate the position of the anterolateral edge of the OT. Brain illustration in the middle summarizes TM10.5 axon projections and indicates the levels at which individual sections were prepared. The pie chart shows the proportion of neuron subtypes tagged at this TM stage with this reporter. Representative images from five mice. Scale bar = 100 μm (A’), 500 μm (A–F). BAOT: bed nuclei of the accessory olfactory tract, CoA: cortical amygdala, EC: entorhinal cortex, MeA: medial amygdala, PLCo: posterolateral cortical amygdala, PMCo: posteromedial cortical amygdala.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Birthdate tagging at TM11.5. A–I, Coronal brain sections prepared from a P21 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; ROSA26-TREmGFP mouse that was given TM at E11.5. Images for mGFP reporter (green) and DAPI (blue). A”, D’, E’, Black and white high contrast image converted from the mGFP image. A’, A”, Higher magnifications of the MOB, of which layer positions are indicated on the right-hand end. Arrowheads (A’, A”) indicate cell bodies of birthdate-tagged MCs. Note that the basal dendrites in the lower part of the EPL are labeled with the reporter. The glomerulus (GL) is encircled by a dotted line (A”). The TM11.5 axons project diffusely to all the MOB and AOB targets (B–I) except the small domain in the anterolateral edge of the OT (asterisks in D, D’, E, E’). D’, E’, Position of a cell cluster is encircled by the blue dotted line and marked with the asterisk. The curved dotted line on the left side of the cell cluster in E’ depicts the lateral hook of the OT cell layer. The labeling of the LOT axons looks less intense possibly because the axons are highly myelinated (Inaki et al., 2004). The brain illustration in the middle summarizes TM11.5 axon projections and indicates the levels at which individual sections were prepared. A pie chart shows the proportion of neuron subtypes tagged at this TM stage with this reporter. Representative images from six mice. Scale bars = 100 μm (A’, A”, D’, E’) and 500 μm (A–I). BAOT: bed nuclei of the accessory olfactory tract, CoA: cortical amygdala, EC: entorhinal cortex, GRL: granule cell layer, MeA: medial amygdala, pD: pars dorsalis, pL: pars lateralis, PLCo: posterolateral cortical amygdala, PMCo: posteromedial cortical amygdala, TT: tenia tecta.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Birthdate tagging at TM12.5. A–I, Coronal brain sections prepared from a P20 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; ROSA26-TREmGFP mouse that was given TM at E12.5. Images for mGFP reporter (green) and DAPI (blue). A”, D’, E’, Black and white high contrast image converted from the mGFP image. A’, A”, Higher magnifications of the MOB, of which layer positions are indicated on the right-hand end. Arrowheads (A’, A”) indicate cell bodies of birthdate-tagged MCs. Note that the basal dendrites in the lower part of the EPL are labeled. The glomerulus (GL) is encircled by a dotted line (A”). The TM11.5 axons project diffusely to all the MOB targets (B–I) except the small domain in the anterolateral edge of the OT (asterisks in D, D’, E, E’). D’, E’, Position of a cell cluster is encircled by the blue dotted line and marked with the asterisk. The curved dotted line on the left side to the cell cluster in E’ depicts the lateral hook of the OT cell layer. A brain illustration in the middle summarizes TM12.5 axon projections and indicates the levels at which individual sections were prepared. A pie chart shows the proportion of neuron subtypes tagged at this TM stage with this reporter. Representative images from seven mice. Scale bars = 100 μm (A’, A”, D’, E’) and 500 μm (A–I). BAOT: bed nuclei of the accessory olfactory tract, CoA: cortical amygdala, EC: entorhinal cortex, GRL: granule cell layer, MeA: medial amygdala, pD: pars dorsalis, pL: pars lateralis, PLCo: posterolateral cortical amygdala, PMCo: posteromedial cortical amygdala, TT: tenia tecta.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Birthdate tagging at TM13.5. Coronal brain sections prepared from P21 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; ROSA26-TREmGFP (A–H) and P21 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; TREtdTomato-sypGFP (I–P) mice that were given TM at E13.5. Images for mGFP reporter (A–H) and tdTomato reporter (I–P) counterstained with DAPI. A”, D’, E’, I”, L’, M’, Black and white high contrast image converted from the reporter image. A’, A”, I’, I”, High magnifications of the MOB, of which layer positions are indicated on the right-hand end. Arrows (A, A’, I, I’) indicate the internal plexiform layer that contains intrabulbar association fibers. Arrowheads (A’, A”, I’, I”) indicate cell bodies of birthdate-tagged imTCs and eTCs. Note that the basal dendrites in the upper part of the EPL are labeled. The glomerulus (GL) is encircled by a dotted line (A”, I”). The TM13.5 axons project to only anterior part of the olfactory target areas (B–H, J–P). Arrowheads (E, F, M, N) indicate axons projecting the lateral part of the OT. Arrowheads (G, O) indicate labeled axons reaching to the caudal end of the LOT. Asterisks (D, D’, E, E’, L, L’, M, M’) indicate the small domain in the anterolateral edge of the OT. D’, E’, L’, M’, Position of a cell cluster is encircled by the blue dotted line and marked with the asterisk. The curved dotted line on the left side of the cell cluster in E’, M’ depicts the lateral hook of the OT cell layer. At this TM injection stage, scattered cells in the PC express reporters (E, F, L–P). The brain illustration in the middle summarizes TM13.5 axon projections and indicates the levels at which individual sections were prepared. The pie chart shows the proportion of neuron subtypes tagged at this TM stage in each reporter line. Representative images from eight (A–F) and seven (G–L) mice. Scale bars = 100 μm (A’, A”, D’, E’, I’, I”, L’, M’) and 500 μm (A–P). CoA: cortical amygdala, GRL: granule cell layer, pD: pars dorsalis, pL: pars lateralis, TT: tenia tecta.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Birthdate tagging at TM15.5. Coronal brain sections prepared from P22 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; ROSA26-TREmGFP (A–F) and P21 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; TREtdTomato-sypGFP (G–L) mice that were given TM at E15.5. Images for mGFP reporter (A–F) and tdTomato reporter (G–L) counterstained with DAPI. A”, D’, E’, G”, J’, K’, Black and white high contrast image converted from the reporter image. A’, A”, G’, G”, High magnifications of the MOB, of which layer positions are indicated on the right-hand end. Arrows (A, A’, G, G’) indicate the internal plexiform layer that contains intrabulbar association fibers. Arrowheads (A’, A”, G’, G”) indicate cell bodies of birthdate-tagged eTCs, whose basal dendrites horizontally extend in the upper part of the EPL. The glomerulus (GL) is encircled by a dotted line (A”, G”). The TM15.5 axons only project to the pE (B, H) and the small domain in the anterolateral edge of the OT (asterisks in D, D’, E, E’, J, J’, K, K’). This domain contains a cell cluster, which is encircled by the yellow dotted line and marked with the asterisk (D’, E’, J’, K’). The curved dotted line on the left of the cell cluster in E’, K’ depicts the lateral hook of the OT cell layer. The brain illustration summarizes TM15.5 axon projections and indicates the levels at which individual sections were prepared. The pie chart shows the proportion of neuron subtypes tagged at this TM stage in each reporter line. Representative images from five (A–F) and nine (G–L) mice. Scale bars = 100 μm (A’, A”, D’, E’, G’, G”, J’, K’) and 500 μm (A–L). GRL: granule cell layer, pD: pars dorsalis, pL: pars lateralis, TT: tenia tecta.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Segregated projections of TM15.5 axons to the target cell cluster in the anterolateral OT. A–D, Coronal brain sections prepared from a P22 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; ROSA26-TREmGFP mouse that was given TM at E15.5. Images for mGFP reporter (green), FluoroMyelin (red) and DAPI (blue). FluoroMyelin marks myelinated OB axons running through the LOT. The TM15.5 axons (arrowheads) ventrally segregate from other OB axons in the LOT (A, B) and terminate at a small cell cluster in the anterolateral edge of the OT (arrowheads and asterisk in C). In a posterior section (D), the cell cluster fuses with the lateral hook of the OT dense cell layer (arrowheads). Representative images from five mice. Scale bars = 500 μm (A–D). pD: pars dorsalis, pL: pars lateralis.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Birthdate tagging at TM17.5. A–D, Coronal brain sections prepared from a P21 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; TREtdTomato-sypGFP (A–D) mouse that was given TM at E17.5. Images for tdTomato reporter and DAPI. D’, Black and white high contrast image converted from the tdTomato reporter image. A’, A”, High magnifications of the MOB, of which layer positions are indicated on the right-hand end. Arrowheads (A’, A”) indicate cell bodies of birthdate-tagged eTCs that barely have basal dendrites. The glomerulus (GL) is encircled by a dotted line (A”). A small number of TM17.5 axons project in the ventral surface of the LOT (arrowheads in B–D). Asterisks (D, D’) show the anterolateral edge of the OT. The cell cluster encircled by the blue dotted line (D’) is not penetrated by TM17.5 axons (arrowheads). The brain illustration summarizes TM17.5 axon projections and indicates the levels at which individual sections were prepared. The pie chart shows the proportion of neuron subtypes tagged at this TM stage in this reporter line. Representative images from seven mice. Scale bars = 100 μm (A’, A”, D’) and 500 μm (A–D). GRL: granule cell layer, pD: pars dorsalis, pL: pars lateralis, TT: tenia tecta.

  • Figure 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11.

    Histochemical characteristics of the target cell cluster of TM15.5 axons. A–E, Five serial coronal sections (20 μm thick), from anterior (A) to posterior (E), prepared from a P21 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; TREtdTomato-sypGFP mouse that was given TM at E15.5. Arrowheads show the cell cluster targeted by TM15.5 axons. The TM15 axons expressing tdTomato (A, C, E) and synaptophysin-GFP (C) reporters densely project to the target cell cluster stained with DAPI (A”–E”). The target cell cluster expresses DARPP (A’, E’), dopamine receptors D1R (B’, D), but not D2R (D’). Dopaminergic axons expressing tyrosine hydroxylase (C’) project over this cell cluster. Representative images from three mice. F, Enlarged image of neurons in the cell cluster, which express DARPP (green) and are projected by the tdTomato-expressing TM15.5 axons (red). Scale bars = 500 μm (A–E) and 10 μm (F).

  • Figure 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 12.

    Afferent projections from aiCAP, the target cell cluster of TM15.5 axons. A, Rhodamine-dextran focally injected into the aiCAP (arrowheads) of a P14.5 Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; TREtdTomato-sypGFP mouse that was given TM at E15.5. B, B’, Enlarged image of the aiCAP (arrowheads) labeled with dextran and DAPI. C, In a posterior section, the dextran-labeled axons make a small fascicle (arrow) coursing posteriorly through the GAD67-expressing plexus (arrowheads) in the OT polymorph layer. D, D’, High magnification of the dextran-labeled fibers (D), which surround neurons (yellow arrowheads), sparsely embedded in the fascicle (D’). Representative images from nine mice in which the aiCAP was successfully labeled with dextran. Scale bars = 500 μm (A, C), 100 μm (B, B’), and 50 μm (D, D’).

  • Figure 13.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 13.

    Topographic and non-topographic maps formed by TM15.5 axons. A–C, Coronal sections prepared from a Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA mouse that was given TM15.5 and then injected with AAV2-TRETurboFP635 and VSVG-TREGFP viruses in the MOB. Medial is to the left and dorsal is to the top. The eTCs on the medial and lateral sides of the MOB are specifically labeled with red and green reporter proteins, respectively (A). The axons make topographic projections to the pE (B) but not the aiCAP (arrowheads in C). Representative images from four mice with successful focal labeling. Scale bar = 200 μm.

  • Figure 14.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 14.

    Development of axon projections to the aiCAP. A-D, Coronal sections prepared from P4 (A), P7 (B), P10 (C), and P14 (D) Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; TREtdTomato-sypGFP mice that were given TM15.5. E-H, Coronal sections prepared from P4 (E), P7 (F), P10 (G), and P14 (H) Neurog2CreER(G2A); Cdhr1tTA; ROSA26-TREmGFP mice that were given TM12.5. Medial is to the left and dorsal is to the top in all panels. Images for tdTomato (A–D) and mGFP (E–H) reporters. Lower panels (A’–H’) show counterstaining images for DAPI and DARPP, which marks the aiCAP (yellow arrowheads) by P4. Scale bar = 200 μm.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    List of mouse lines used in this study

    Mouse lineGenomic locusEnhancer/promoterReporter/effectorSourceDescription
    Neurog2CreER(G2A)Unknown transgenic insertionNeurog2Cre-ERThis article #CDB0512T−1Neuronal birthdate tag driver designed for TM administration to induce recombination of loxP sequences in a neuronal birthdate-dependent manner
    TaumGFP-nLacZMapt (microtubule-associated protein tau) locusMapt:widespread neuronal expressionMembrane-bound GFP and nuclear-targeted β-gal Hippenmeyer et al. (2005)
    JAX stock #021162
    After Cre-loxP recombination, dual reporter proteins are expressed in neurons throughout the nervous system
    Cdhr1tTAUnknown transgenic insertionCdhr1: OB-specific expressiontTAThis article #CDB0535T:After Cre-loxP recombination, tTA isexpressed in OB projection neurons
    TREtdTomato-sypGFPUnknown transgenic insertionTREtdTomato and synaptophysin-fused GFP Li et al. (2010)
    JAX stock #12345
    Designed for tTA to drive ubiquitous expression of dual reporter proteins in any types of cells
    ROSA26-TREmGFPROSA26 locusTREMembrane-bound GFPThis article #CDB0300KDesigned for tTA to drive ubiquitous expression of the reporter protein in any types of cells

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data Figure 1-1

    Number of neurons counted in Fig.1. Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 3-1

    Number of neurons counted in Fig.3. Download Figure 3-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 6 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 6, Issue 6
November/December 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Novel Birthdate-Labeling Method Reveals Segregated Parallel Projections of Mitral and External Tufted Cells in the Main Olfactory System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Novel Birthdate-Labeling Method Reveals Segregated Parallel Projections of Mitral and External Tufted Cells in the Main Olfactory System
Tatsumi Hirata, Go Shioi, Takaya Abe, Hiroshi Kiyonari, Shigeki Kato, Kazuto Kobayashi, Kensaku Mori, Takahiko Kawasaki
eNeuro 31 October 2019, 6 (6) ENEURO.0234-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0234-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
A Novel Birthdate-Labeling Method Reveals Segregated Parallel Projections of Mitral and External Tufted Cells in the Main Olfactory System
Tatsumi Hirata, Go Shioi, Takaya Abe, Hiroshi Kiyonari, Shigeki Kato, Kazuto Kobayashi, Kensaku Mori, Takahiko Kawasaki
eNeuro 31 October 2019, 6 (6) ENEURO.0234-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0234-19.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • birthdate tag
  • dopamine
  • olfactory system
  • olfactory tubercle
  • parallel pathway
  • tufted cell

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Novel Tools and Methods

  • Cell Density Impacts Population Activity in Human iPSC-Derived Neural Networks
  • Optimizing and Benchmarking Machine Learning and Traditional Synaptic Event Detection Pipelines in Neurophysiology Experiments
  • Adapting a Two-Photon Scanning Microscope for Simultaneous Single-Photon Imaging of an Infrared Dopamine Sensor
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.