Figure 1: Comparison of learning curves | | | |
Male control groups | RM ANOVA | WT/Reg: n = 3 WT/Val: n = 3 Nes-TK/Reg: n = 5 | Group: F = 3.84 p = 0.0677 |
Female control groups | RM ANOVA | WT/Reg: n = 3 WT/Val: n = 1 Nes-TK/Reg: n = 2 | Group: F = 0.51 p = 0.6454 |
Male vs female controls | RM ANOVA | Male: n = 11 Female: n = 6 | Group: F = 0.63 p = 0.6346 |
Male; Con vs Exp | RM ANOVA | Con: n = 11 Exp: n = 13 | Group: F = 15.2 p = 0.0008 Interaction: F = 1.837 p = 0.0487 |
Male; Con vs Exp All sessions | Unpaired t tests | Con: n = 11 Exp: n = 13 | H1: p = 0.06 H2: p = 0.24 T1: p = 0.022 T2: p = 0.0071 T3: p = 0.0011 T4: p = 0.029 T5: p = 0.018 T6: p = 0.0017 T7: p = 0.0087 T8: p = 0.0045 T9: p = 0.034 T10: p = 0.062 |
Female; Con vs Exp | RM ANOVA | Con: n = 6 Exp: n = 5 | Group: F = 0.89 p = 0.3696 |
Figure 2: Comparing number of DCX+ cells | | | |
Male; Con vs Exp | Unpaired t test | Con: n = 11 Exp: n = 13 | p = 0.0011 |
Female; Con vs Exp | Unpaired t test | Con: n = 6 Exp: n = 5 | p = 0.0947 |
Figure 3: Correlation between learning and number of DCX+ cells | | | |
Male; DCX vs average CRs | Pearson’s correlation | n = 24 | r = 0.574 p = 0.0027 |
Male; DCX vs trials to 6 CRs of 10 trials | Pearson’s correlation | n = 24 | r = −0.519 p = 0.0121 |
Female; DCX vs average CRs | Pearson’s correlation | n = 11 | r = −0.025 p = 0.943 |
Female; DCX vs trials to 6 CRs of 10 trials | Pearson’s correlation | n = 11 | r = 0.102 p = 0.77 |