Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

PIM-Related Kinases Selectively Regulate Olfactory Sensations in Caenorhabditis elegans

Karunambigai S. Kalichamy, Kaisa Ikkala, Jonna Pörsti, Niina M. Santio, Joel Tuomaala, Sweta Jha, Carina I. Holmberg and Päivi J. Koskinen
eNeuro 6 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0003-19.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0003-19.2019
Karunambigai S. Kalichamy
1Section of Physiology and Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karunambigai S. Kalichamy
Kaisa Ikkala
1Section of Physiology and Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonna Pörsti
1Section of Physiology and Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niina M. Santio
1Section of Physiology and Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joel Tuomaala
1Section of Physiology and Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joel Tuomaala
Sweta Jha
2Research Programs Unit, Translational Cancer Biology Program, University of Helsinki, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carina I. Holmberg
2Research Programs Unit, Translational Cancer Biology Program, University of Helsinki, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carina I. Holmberg
Päivi J. Koskinen
1Section of Physiology and Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Päivi J. Koskinen
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Mammalian PIM kinases and C. elegans PRKs are true orthologs. A, Amino acid sequences of C. elegans PRK-1 (NM_001276777.1) and PRK-2 (CAA84323.2) were aligned with Homo sapiens PIM-1 (NP_001230115.1), PIM-2 (NP_006866.2), and PIM-3 (NP_001001852.2), and Mus musculus PIM-1 (NP_032868.2), PIM-2 (NP_613072.1), and PIM-3 (NP_663453.1), using the Clustal X 2.0 software (Thompson et al., 1997). Identical or similar amino acids present in all or only in some of them are marked with black or gray backgrounds, respectively. Positions of the conserved ATP-binding and catalytically active sites are highlighted with red and blue lines, respectively. B, The amino acid sequences of the C. elegans (PRK-1 and PRK-2), Danio rerio (PIM-1, PIM-2, and PIM-3), Xenopus laevis (PIM-1 and PIM-3), Mus musculus (PIM-1, PIM-2, and PIM-3) and Homo sapiens (PIM-1, PIM-2, and PIM-3) were used to draw a phylogenetic tree of PIM orthologs and paralogs in distinct species (http://www.phylogeny.fr). The scale of 0.4 refers to 40% difference between sequences.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    PIM and PRK kinases function similarly in vitro. A, Radioactive kinase assays were performed to analyze the in vitro ability of human PIM-1 and C. elegans PRK-2 to phosphorylate themselves or the PIM substrate NFATC1 (amino acids 1–418) in the absence (−) or presence (+) of 10 μm DHPCC-9. The intensities of phosphorylated proteins are shown at the top and the total amounts of proteins at the bottom. Shown are also the relative levels of phosphorylation of kinases and their substrates in control versus drug-treated samples in this dataset representing three independent experiments. B, PRK-1 autophosphorylation was analyzed in the absence (−) or presence (+) of 10 μm DHPCC-9, AZD-1208, or SGI-1776. The phosphorylated protein was visualized by immunoblotting with the phospho-RXXS*/T* antibody, which has several potential target sites in PRK-1.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    PIM inhibitors specifically suppress olfactory sensing via AWCON neurons. Synchronized young adult animals were exposed to indicated concentrations of PIM inhibitors DHPCC-9 (A, B), AZD-1208 (C, D), or SGI-1776 (E, F) for 120 min. Chemotaxis assays with odorants were performed for another 120 min. Chemical structures of the PIM inhibitors are shown in between the dose-dependent chemotactic indices of animals in response to AWC odorants (A, C, E) butanone (1:1000), benzaldehyde (1:200), IAA (1:100), and 2,3-pentanedione (1:10000), or AWA odorants (B, D, F) diacetyl (1:1000), pyrazine (10 mg/ml), and TMT (1:1000). Each data point represents the mean of at least six independent experiments with 150–200 animals per assay. Error bars indicate SEM and asterisks statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) between control and drug-exposed animals.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Inhibition of butanone sensing is reversible and dependent on odorant dosage. Animals exposed for 120 min to 200 μm DHPCC-9 (A, C) or 100 μm SGI-1776 (B, D) were assayed for chemotaxis to butanone (1:1000) after indicated intervals of recovery times (A, B), or to indicated dilutions of butanone (C, D). Each data point represents the means and SEM of four independent experiments with 150–200 animals per assay.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    PRK-1 expression and activity is required for butanone sensing. A, Reproductive capacities of wild-type (WT; n = 13), prk-1(pk86) (n = 5), and prk-2(ok3069) (n = 9) animals, as determined by the amounts of eggs laid by each parent. Shown in the box plots are mean (cross), median, quartiles (boxes), and range (whiskers). The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) between wild-type and mutant animals. B, Wild-type and mutant animals were tested for chemotaxis toward butanone (1:1000) or IAA (1:100). tax-2 was used as a chemotaxis-deficient control strain. For butanone and IAA, the box plot data are derived from five and three independent experiments, respectively, with 100–150 animals per assay. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) between wild-type and mutant animals. C, D, The same strains were also exposed for 120 min to 200 μm DHPCC-9 and then tested as above toward butanone (C) or IAA (D). The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) between wild-type and mutant animals.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    PRK-1 is essential also for sensing of olfactory repellents via AWB neurons. A, Wild-type animals were treated for 120 min with indicated concentrations of DHPCC-9 or SGI-1776. Aversion assays with 1-octanol (1:100) were performed for another 120 min. Shown are dose-dependent avoidance indices. Each data point represents the mean and SEM of at least four independent experiments with 100–150 animals per assay. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) between control- and drug-exposed animals. B, WT, prk-1(pk86), and prk-2(ok3069) animals were similarly tested for aversion to 1-octanol. Shown are box plot data collected from three independent experiments with 100–150 animals per assay. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) between wild-type and mutant animals.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    PIM inhibitors do not affect responses to gustatory attractants or repellents. Wild-type animals were treated for 120 min with 200 μm DHPCC-9 or 100 μm SGI-1776 and assayed for responses to gustatory attractants (A) or repellents (B–D). A, Shown are box plots of chemotactic indices of control- or drug-exposed animals to 2.5 m NaCl or 2.5 m KCl. Data were collected from three independent experiments with 150–200 animals per assay. B–D, Indicated concentrations of CuSO4 were pipetted across the midlines of the assay plates. Control- or drug-exposed animals were placed on one side and drops of ethanol (B), butanone (C), or IAA (D) to the other side. After 120 min of incubation, chemotactic indices to the odorants were calculated. Shown are box plot data collected from four independent experiments with 150–200 animals per assay. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) between control- and drug-exposed animals.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Expression pattern of prk-1. A, B, Lateral bright-field (BF) and fluorescent views of a representative adult animal from the transgenic prk-1::GFP strain expressing GFP in amphid and phasmid neurons and in the intestine. Areas indicated by rectangles have been magnified to show GFP expression in the amphid and phasmid neurons (white arrowhead). C–H, Lateral views from different focal planes of a double transgenic animal expressing the prk-1 promoter-driven GFP (C, F) and the odr-1 promoter-driven RFP marker (D, G) in AWC (*) and AWB (Δ) neurons, as well as their colocalization in the merged picture (E, H). I–K, Dorsal view from another double transgenic animal to demonstrate that the prk-1 and odr-1 promoter-driven markers are expressed on both sides of the head.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 6 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 6, Issue 4
July/August 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PIM-Related Kinases Selectively Regulate Olfactory Sensations in Caenorhabditis elegans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
PIM-Related Kinases Selectively Regulate Olfactory Sensations in Caenorhabditis elegans
Karunambigai S. Kalichamy, Kaisa Ikkala, Jonna Pörsti, Niina M. Santio, Joel Tuomaala, Sweta Jha, Carina I. Holmberg, Päivi J. Koskinen
eNeuro 6 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0003-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0003-19.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
PIM-Related Kinases Selectively Regulate Olfactory Sensations in Caenorhabditis elegans
Karunambigai S. Kalichamy, Kaisa Ikkala, Jonna Pörsti, Niina M. Santio, Joel Tuomaala, Sweta Jha, Carina I. Holmberg, Päivi J. Koskinen
eNeuro 6 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0003-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0003-19.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • chemosensory neurons
  • chemotaxis
  • gustation
  • PIM kinases
  • olfaction
  • phosphorylation

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Combinatorial Approaches to Restore Corticospinal Function after Spinal Cord Injury
  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
  • Interference underlies attenuation upon relearning in sensorimotor adaptation
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.