Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleMethods/New Tools, Novel Tools and Methods

Tmem119-EGFP and Tmem119-CreERT2 Transgenic Mice for Labeling and Manipulating Microglia

Tobias Kaiser and Guoping Feng
eNeuro 1 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0448-18.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0448-18.2019
Tobias Kaiser
1McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
2Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guoping Feng
1McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
2Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
3Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Guoping Feng
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Generation and validation of Tmem119-EGFP and Tmem119-CreERT2 knock-in lines. A, Experimental strategy using a guide RNA (blue bar) to introduce a double-strand break at the Tmem119 stop codon in mouse zygotes and an injection mixture containing EGFP ssDNA template with short homology arms of 55–300 bp or CreERT2 dsDNA template with long 1.5 kb homology arms. Each knock-in is designed to cause in-frame insertion of P2A peptide followed by EGFP or CreERT2 and a stop codon. Not drawn to scale. B, Confirmation of insertion by amplification of fragments spanning the 5′ and 3′ junctions using sets of primers binding inside the template and outside the homology arms (A, open and closed arrows with arrowheads indicating corresponding products). C, D, Sanger sequencing across the 5′ and 3′ junction of the CreERT2 line and comparison to WT sequence indicate seamless insertion in the transgenic mice (Tg). E, qPCR analysis of gene expression for Tmem119 in WT controls and Tmem119-EGFP+/− knock-in animals. N = 4 WT, N = 6 Tmem119-EGFP+/− mice. F, Representative TMEM119 immunoreactivity in WT controls and Tmem119-EGFP+/− knock-in animals. G, Relative intensity of TMEM119 immunostaining signal. N = 4 WT, N = 4 Tmem119-EGFP+/− mice. H, I, Representative IBA-immunostained microglia and corresponding Neurolucida traces in WT and Tmem119-EGFP+/− knock-in mice. J–M, Quantified cell body area, number of processes, convex hull area, and total process length of microglia in WT and Tmem119-EGFP+/− knock-in mice. N = 12 microglia from four mice per genotype. TAA (red bar), stop codon.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    EGFP labels microglia in all regions across the brain. A, Representative epifluorescence image of a sagittal section of a P25 Tmem119-EGFP+/− mouse stained with an anti-GFP antibody for improved signal-to-noise ratio (data for 1 of 3 mice shown). B–E, High-power confocal micrographs of native EGFP fluorescence (B, green) in TMEM119 (C, red) and IBA1 (D, white) microglia in the cortical region outlined in A. FIJI-calculated composite image showing all three labels (E). Boxes 3A and 3B Boxes cross-reference areas shown in Figure 3. F–J, Flow cytometry analysis showing gating for of single, live, CD45-positive cells (1 of 3 independent experiments shown). Numbers in or adjacent to outlined areas indicate percentage cells in each gate. K, L, Representative density plots showing EGFP expression in WT and Tmem119-EGFP+/− mice (pre-gated on CD45+ cells). M, Representative density plot showing CD11b+CD45lo cells corresponding to microglia (pre-gated on CD45+ cells). N, Histogram showing fraction of CD11b+CD45lo microglia expressing EGFP. O–R, Representative immunostaining for oligodendrocytes (O; Olig2, red), neurons (P; NeuN, red), and astrocytes (Q; GFAP, red) in EGFP-expressing Tmem119-EGFP+/− mice. One of three independent experiments shown.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    EGFP discerns parenchymal microglia from other brain macrophages in the Tmem119-EGFP line. A, IBA1 labels meningeal macrophages and parenchymal microglia from the region indicate with a dashed box in Figure 2A. B, EGFP labels only parenchymal macrophages (open arrowheads), but not meningeal IBA1-positive macrophages (closed arrowheads). Diffuse fluorescence is associated with pia. ECIC, External cortex of inferior colliculus; Cer, cerebellum. Scale bar, 100 μm. C, D, Choroid plexus IBA1+ macrophages (closed arrowheads) from the region boxed in Figure 2A are not labeled with EGFP, whereas adjacent parenchymal microglia are (open arrowheads). Hpc, Hippocampus. Scale bar, 100 μm. E, F, Perivascular CD163-expressing macrophages (E, red, closed arrowheads) are not labeled with EGFP (F, green, open arrowheads). Scale bar, 100 μm. G–I, Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b and CD45 expression in pre-gated single live CD45+ cells and EGFP-expressing CD45+ cells of Tmem119-EGFP+/− mice shown as density plots (G, CD45+ and H CD45+ EGFP+) and overlay (I, black CD45+, green CD45+ EGFP+). One of three independent experiments (N ≥ 3 mice per group) shown. Numbers in or adjacent to outlined areas indicate percentage cells in each gate.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Tmem119-EGFP mice label microglia at early postnatal stages. Sagittal slices from P1, P3, and P6 mice were stained against IBA1. A–C, High-power confocal images of the somatosensory cortex show EGFP expression in IBA-positive cells and blood vessels at P1 (solid arrowheads in magnified panel). D–F, Confocal micrographs around the forceps major of corpus callosum (CC) and hippocampus (Hpc) show EGFP-labeled, IBA1-positive microglia at P3. G–I, Confocal micrographs of the striatum (CPu) and CC show EGFP labeling of IBA-positive cells at P3. J–L, Confocal micrographs of the P6 cortex reveal EGFP-expression in IBA-immunostained cells. Error bars, 100 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Tmem119-CreERT2 mice effectively recombine a conditional allele in microglia. A, Tmem119-CreERT2 mice were crossed to Ai14(RCL-tdT)-D mice and tamoxifen (TAM) was administered to induce tdTomato expression. Different sets of adult mice received tamoxifen per os (p.o.) for 3, 5, or 10 d and a set of neonatal mice received TAM for 3 d intraperitoneally (i.p). The mice were killed for flow cytometry (FC) 7 d after the 3 d dosing paradigm or for immunofluorescence (IF) 9 or more days after dosing. B–D, Representative confocal micrograph showing tdTomato expression in IBA-positive microglia upon tamoxifen administration. E–G, Absence of tdTomato expression in untreated animals. H–J, Representative immunostaining for oligodendrocytes (H, Olig2, green), neurons (I, NeuN, green), and astrocytes (J, GFAP, green) in tdTomato-expressing microglia of Tmem119-CreERT2+/−; Ai14(RCL-tdT)-D+/− mice. One of three independent experiments shown. K, L, Percentage completion (K) and fidelity (L) of the labeling in different brain regions for the different dosing schemes. Hpc, Hippocampus; CPu, caudate–putamen; Ctx, cortex. N = 2 mice for 3 d, 3 mice each for 5 and 10 d of TAM in adults, and 3 mice for 3 d administration at P2. Floating bars = min to max, line at mean. M, Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b and CD45 expression in pre-gated single live CD45+ cells and tdTomato-expressing CD45+ cells of Tmem119-CreERT2+/−; Ai14(RCL-tdT)-D+/− mice shown as overlay (I, black CD45+, red CD45+ tdTomato+). One of two representative experiments (N = 3 mice). N–O, Confocal micrograph of the choroid plexus and adjacent parenchyma. Q–S, Confocal micrograph of CD31-immunostained blood vessels (green) shows tdTomato+ microglia (arrowheads) and tdTomato expression in a large blood vessel (open arrowhead). T–V, Confocal micrograph showing tdTomato expression in cortical microglia and cells of the pia (open arrowheads). W–Z, Confocal micrograph showing CD163- (white) and IBA1-expressing (green) macrophages. The open arrowhead indicates a tdTomato-CD163+IBA1+ perivascular macrophage. Closed arrowheads parenchymal microglia. One of three independent experiments shown (N = 3 mice).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Blood monocyte profiling in Tmem119 knock-in mice. A, Experimental approach for flow cytometry of monocytes isolated from whole blood. B, C, Representative flow cytometry analysis of EGFP expression in pre-gated single live CD45+ cells in WT control (B) and Tmem119-EGFP+/− mice (C). One of three experiments is shown (N = 3 mice). Numbers in or adjacent to outlined areas indicate percentage cells in each gate. D, Adult mice of Tmem119-CreERT2+/−; Ai14(RCL-tdT)-D+/− mice received tamoxifen (TAM) per os (p.o.) for 3 d. The mice were sacrificed 7 d after the last dose for flow cytometry (FC). E, F, Representative flow cytometry analysis of tdTomato expression in pre-gated single live CD45+ cells in Ai14(RCL-tdT)-D+/− (E) and Tmem119-CreERT2+/−; Ai14(RCL-tdT)-D+/− mice (F). One of two independent experiments is shown (N = 3 mice).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Quantification of EGFP labeled microglia in Tmem119-EGFP mice

    Brain regionCompleteness, %
    (EGFP+Iba+/Iba+)
    Fidelity, %
    (EGFP+Iba+/EGFP+)
    Somatosensory cortex98.2 ± 3.396.1 ± 2.0
    Striatum97.2 ± 1.899.2 ± 2.1
    Thalamus96.9 ± 2.398.5 ± 0.8
    Hippocampus98.5 ± 3.598.9 ± 1.9
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Statistical table

    Data structureType of test95% Confidence interval of difference between medians
    aN too small to test normalityMann–Whitney test−0.3393 to 0.2262
    bN too small to test normalityMann–Whitney test−0.1601 to 0.3359
    cN too small to test normalityMann–Whitney test−11.59 to 7.300
    dN too small to test normalityMann–Whitney test−2.000 to 1.000
    eN too small to test normalityMann–Whitney test−963.9 to 560.5
    fN too small to test normalityMann–Whitney test−109.0 to 120.0
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 6 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 6, Issue 4
July/August 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tmem119-EGFP and Tmem119-CreERT2 Transgenic Mice for Labeling and Manipulating Microglia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Tmem119-EGFP and Tmem119-CreERT2 Transgenic Mice for Labeling and Manipulating Microglia
Tobias Kaiser, Guoping Feng
eNeuro 1 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0448-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0448-18.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Tmem119-EGFP and Tmem119-CreERT2 Transgenic Mice for Labeling and Manipulating Microglia
Tobias Kaiser, Guoping Feng
eNeuro 1 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0448-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0448-18.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • CreERT2
  • EGFP
  • macrophage
  • microglia
  • Tmem119
  • transgenic

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Methods/New Tools

  • Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
  • A Toolbox of Criteria for Distinguishing Cajal–Retzius Cells from Other Neuronal Types in the Postnatal Mouse Hippocampus
  • Assessment of Spontaneous Neuronal Activity In Vitro Using Multi-Well Multi-Electrode Arrays: Implications for Assay Development
Show more Methods/New Tools

Novel Tools and Methods

  • Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
  • A Toolbox of Criteria for Distinguishing Cajal–Retzius Cells from Other Neuronal Types in the Postnatal Mouse Hippocampus
  • Assessment of Spontaneous Neuronal Activity In Vitro Using Multi-Well Multi-Electrode Arrays: Implications for Assay Development
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.