Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

MVPA Analysis of Intertrial Phase Coherence of Neuromagnetic Responses to Words Reliably Classifies Multiple Levels of Language Processing in the Brain

Mads Jensen, Rasha Hyder and Yury Shtyrov
eNeuro 5 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0444-18.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0444-18.2019
Mads Jensen
1Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mads Jensen
Rasha Hyder
1Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yury Shtyrov
1Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
2Laboratory of Behavioural Neurodynamics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, Examples of spectrograms of spoken stimuli used in the experiment (adapted from Gansonre et al., (2018)). B, Examples of waveforms plotted on top of each other.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Top, Heatmap of significant clusters across three linguistic contrasts, five frequency bands, and time. Lexical condition in blue colors, semantic in green, and syntax in red. Bottom, Surface topography of significant effects. For all conditions, colors go from lighter to darker as latency becomes longer.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    A, Model patterns: interpreting coefficients of a machine learning model is not trivial and a high coefficient value does not necessitate a high signal value in the MEG data (for details, see Haufe et al., 2014). “Model patterns” are a way to highlight the signal in a neurophysiological sensible way that is directly interpretable compared to the raw coefficients (Haufe et al., 2014). We show top and bottom 5% of the patterns in the γ-low band from 222 to 238 ms. Blue colors are areas of activation able to predict real words and yellow/red are areas used to predict pseudo word. B, Average top and bottom 5% of ITPC difference; blue colors indicate higher ITPC for real words and yellow/red colors indicate higher ITPC for pseudo word γ-low band from 222 to 238 ms. C, Average ITPC over time; solid lines are the average of the selected features, dashed lines are the average of all vertices in the source space. Time 0 is the divergence point, when stimuli could be recognized from the available acoustic information.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Heatmap of ROC-AUC scores for all bands in lexical condition. Note that chance in this condition is 75%. Time is relative to DP.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    A, Model patterns (see also Fig. 4 legend): top and bottom 5% of the patterns in the the α band from 80 to 122 ms. Blue colors are areas used to predict action verb and yellow/red are areas used to predict object noun. B, Average top and bottom 5% of ITPC difference, blue colors indicating higher ITPC for action verb and yellow/red indicating higher ITPC for object noun from 80 to 122 ms. C, Average ITPC over time, solid lines are the average of the selected features, dashed lines are the average of all vertices in the source space. Time 0 is the divergence point, when stimuli could be recognized from the available acoustic information.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Heatmap of ROC-AUC scores for all bands in semantic condition.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    A, Model patterns: top and bottom 5% of the patterns in the γ-low band from 84 to 98 ms. Blue colors are areas used to predict correct syntax and yellow/red are areas used to predict incorrect syntax. B, Average top and bottom 5% of ITPC difference. Blue colors indicate higher ITPC for correct syntax and yellow/red colors indicate higher ITPC γ-low band from 84 to 98 ms. C, Average ITPC over time; solid lines are the average of the selected features, dashed lines are the average of all vertices in the source space. Time is relative to the divergence point.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Heatmap of ROC-AUC scores for all bands in syntax condition.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Table of significant clusters in the lexical condition sorted by time from the divergence point

    Lexical
    BandPeak (%)Peak SD (%)Peak time (ms)Cluster start (ms)Cluster end (ms)Cluster length (ms)Cluster mean (%)Cluster SD (%)
    γ-Medium88.536.436662761483.204.57
    γ-Low94.354.502242222381685.029.68
    γ-High87.889.293583503661680.194.95
    γ-Low87.6511.084404324481681.344.99
    γ-Low87.718.835165105342481.344.36
    β85.9714.955385305461680.254.32
    • Peak is highest ROC-AUC scores of the cluster. Peak SD is the standard deviation (SD) of cross-validation folds for the peak ROC-AUC score. Peak time is the time of the peak from DP. Cluster start is the start time of the cluster from DP. Cluster end is the end time of the cluster from DP. Cluster length is the length of the cluster. Cluster mean is the mean ROC-AUC score of the cluster. Cluster SD is the SD of the cluster mean across cross-validation folds.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Table of significant clusters in the semantic condition sorted by time from the divergence point

    Semantics
    BandPeak (%)Peak SD (%)Peak time (ms)Cluster start (ms)Cluster end (ms)Cluster length (ms)Cluster mean (%)Cluster SD (%)
    α91.1112.96106801224268.219.77
    β75.0019.081381341461269.625.25
    γ-Low84.589.012242202301071.857.06
    β70.0013.432562542641066.533.37
    α85.833.745845745901671.717.62
    • See the legend of Table 1 for an explanation of the columns.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Table of significant clusters in the syntax condition sorted by time from the divergence point

    Syntax
    BandPeak (%)Peak SD (%)Peak time (ms)Cluster start (ms)Cluster end (ms)Cluster length (ms)Cluster mean (%)Cluster SD (%)
    γ-Low69.2213.059085981262.579.16
    γ-Low68.3611.573023003141464.045.10
    • See the legend of Table 1 for an explanation of the columns.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Table of peak scores for each bands and condition, dash (-) indicates no significant cluster

    Condition
    Lexical conditionSemantic conditionSyntax condition
    BandPeak scorePeak SDPeak timePeak scorePeak SDPeak timePeak scorePeak SDPeak time
    α---91.1112.96106---
    β85.9714.9553875.0019.08138---
    γ-Low94.354.5022484.589.0122469.2213.0590
    γ-Medium88.536.4366------
    γ-High87.889.29358------
    • Peak score is highest ROC-AUC scores of the cluster. Peak SD is the SD of cross-validation folds for the peak ROC-AUC score. Peak time is the time of the peak from DP.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 6 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 6, Issue 4
July/August 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MVPA Analysis of Intertrial Phase Coherence of Neuromagnetic Responses to Words Reliably Classifies Multiple Levels of Language Processing in the Brain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
MVPA Analysis of Intertrial Phase Coherence of Neuromagnetic Responses to Words Reliably Classifies Multiple Levels of Language Processing in the Brain
Mads Jensen, Rasha Hyder, Yury Shtyrov
eNeuro 5 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0444-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0444-18.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
MVPA Analysis of Intertrial Phase Coherence of Neuromagnetic Responses to Words Reliably Classifies Multiple Levels of Language Processing in the Brain
Mads Jensen, Rasha Hyder, Yury Shtyrov
eNeuro 5 August 2019, 6 (4) ENEURO.0444-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0444-18.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • language
  • magnetoencephalography (MEG)
  • multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA)
  • oscillations
  • lexical access
  • semantics
  • morphosyntax

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Upright posture: a singular condition stabilizing sensorimotor coordination
  • Serotonergic signaling governs C. elegans sensory response to conflicting chemosensory stimuli.
  • Cerebellum involvement in visuo-vestibular interaction for the perception of gravitational direction: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.