Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts
eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Cognition and Behavior

Chemogenetic Suppression of Medial Prefrontal-Dorsal Hippocampal Interactions Prevents Estrogenic Enhancement of Memory Consolidation in Female Mice

Jennifer J. Tuscher, Lisa R. Taxier, Jayson C. Schalk, Jacqueline M. Haertel and Karyn M. Frick
eNeuro 1 April 2019, 6 (2) ENEURO.0451-18.2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0451-18.2019
Jennifer J. Tuscher
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jennifer J. Tuscher
Lisa R. Taxier
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lisa R. Taxier
Jayson C. Schalk
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline M. Haertel
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karyn M. Frick
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karyn M. Frick
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Infusion of E2 into the mPFC immediately after training enhances memory consolidation. Mice infused with E2 directly into the mPFC spent significantly more time than chance (dashed line at 15 s) with the novel object (A, C) when tested 48 h after training, or with the moved object (B, D) 24 h after training. Mice infused with vehicle (Veh) into the mPFC did not spend more time than chance with the novel or moved objects. These data suggest that E2 can improve the consolidation of object memories by acting directly in the mPFC. Bars represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); *p < 0.05 relative to chance and the vehicle group (n = 10–13/group).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    mPFC E2 infusion increases apical spine density in the mPFC 2 h later. Relative to vehicle (Veh), apical but not basal, spine density was significantly increased in the mPFC 2 h after mPFC infusion of 5-µg E2 per hemisphere (A). mPFC infusion did not alter apical or basal spine density in CA1 2 h after mPFC infusion of E2 (B). Bars represent the mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 relative to the vehicle group (n = 6–8/group). C, Representative photomicrographs of Golgi-impregnated secondary apical dendrites from pyramidal cells in Layer II/III of the mPFC. Under oil 100×.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    hM4Di and eGFP viral expression in the mPFC is present three weeks after injection. Coronal sections (40 µm) of CaMKIIα-hM4Di-mCitrine DREADD (A, C) or CaMKIIα-eGFP control virus (B, D) in the mPFC of female mice three weeks after injection confirms virus expression throughout the mPFC. Blue puncta: DAPI, a marker of cell nuclei; yellow: mCitrine-tagged DREADD virus; green: eGFP-tagged control virus. Merged images provide additional spatial context for DREADD or control virus expression within the region of interest.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Chemogenetic suppression of the mPFC immediately after training prevents the memory enhancement induced by DH E2 infusion. Sham, eGFP, or hM4Di control groups receiving CNO+Veh did not spend significantly more time than chance (15 s) with the novel object when tested 48 h after OR training (A, C) or with the displaced object (B, D) 24 h after training. In contrast, sham or eGFP mice receiving CNO+E2 immediately after training did spend significantly more time than chance with the moved and novel objects, displaying intact OP and OR memory. However, hM4Di mice treated with CNO+E2 immediately after training did not demonstrate intact memory, suggesting that DREADD-mediated suppression of the mPFC blocks the beneficial mnemonic effects of DH-infused E2. Bars represent the mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 relative to chance, all Veh-infused groups, and the hM4Di-E2 group (n = 9–11/group); +p < 0.05 relative to chance and the Sham+Veh-infused and hM4Di-E2 groups (n = 9–11/group).

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 6 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 6, Issue 2
March/April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chemogenetic Suppression of Medial Prefrontal-Dorsal Hippocampal Interactions Prevents Estrogenic Enhancement of Memory Consolidation in Female Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Chemogenetic Suppression of Medial Prefrontal-Dorsal Hippocampal Interactions Prevents Estrogenic Enhancement of Memory Consolidation in Female Mice
Jennifer J. Tuscher, Lisa R. Taxier, Jayson C. Schalk, Jacqueline M. Haertel, Karyn M. Frick
eNeuro 1 April 2019, 6 (2) ENEURO.0451-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0451-18.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Chemogenetic Suppression of Medial Prefrontal-Dorsal Hippocampal Interactions Prevents Estrogenic Enhancement of Memory Consolidation in Female Mice
Jennifer J. Tuscher, Lisa R. Taxier, Jayson C. Schalk, Jacqueline M. Haertel, Karyn M. Frick
eNeuro 1 April 2019, 6 (2) ENEURO.0451-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0451-18.2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • DREADD
  • estradiol
  • hippocampus
  • mouse
  • prefrontal cortex
  • spine density

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Probing proteostatic stress in degenerating photoreceptors using two complementary in vivo reporters of proteasomal activity
  • Multi-scale Imaging Reveals Aberrant Functional Connectome Organization and Elevated Dorsal Striatal Arc Expression in Advanced Age
  • Toric spines at a site of learning
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Multi-scale Imaging Reveals Aberrant Functional Connectome Organization and Elevated Dorsal Striatal Arc Expression in Advanced Age
  • Distinct genetic signatures of cortical and subcortical regions associated with human memory
  • A new theory of gender dysphoria incorporating the distress, social behavioral, and body-ownership networks
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Articles

  • Early Release
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Video Archive
  • Editorials

For Authors

  • Information for Authors
  • Contact Information

About

  • Overview
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertise
  • For the Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2019 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.