Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Ferroptosis in Neurons and Cancer Cells Is Similar But Differentially Regulated by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

Marietta Zille, Amit Kumar, Nandini Kundu, Megan W. Bourassa, Victor S. C. Wong, Dianna Willis, Saravanan S. Karuppagounder and Rajiv R. Ratan
eNeuro 31 January 2019, 6 (1) ENEURO.0263-18.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0263-18.2019
Marietta Zille
1Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York 10605
2Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
3Fraunhofer Research Institution for Marine Biotechnology and Cell Technology and Institute for Medical and Marine Biotechnology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, 23562, Germany
4Institute for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, 23562, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marietta Zille
Amit Kumar
1Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York 10605
2Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amit Kumar
Nandini Kundu
1Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York 10605
2Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nandini Kundu
Megan W. Bourassa
1Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York 10605
2Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor S. C. Wong
1Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York 10605
2Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Victor S. C. Wong
Dianna Willis
1Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York 10605
2Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dianna Willis
Saravanan S. Karuppagounder
1Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York 10605
2Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Saravanan S. Karuppagounder
Rajiv R. Ratan
1Burke Neurological Institute, White Plains, New York 10605
2Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rajiv R. Ratan
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Extended Data
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Models of cysteine deprivation. A, The ferroptosis inhibitor erastin is a selective inhibitor of the Xc− transporter. Similarly, in cells devoid of ionotropic glutamate receptors, such as tumor cells and immature neurons, glutamate and its analog HCA work as nonspecific inhibitors of the System Xc− transporter by counteracting the glutamate gradient resulting in reduced uptake of cystine into the cells. This leads to a decrease in glutathione synthesis, which is essential for the endogenous antioxidant defense. Ferroptosis inhibitors are indicated in green. NAC, N-acetylcysteine. B, HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells were treated with increasing dose of erastin at previously described density (left; 100,000 cells/ml) and adjusted density to reach 70% confluency before treatment (right; 25,000 cells/ml) to determine the toxicologically meaningful dose of erastin. Representative live/dead staining are shown, green indicating live cells (calcein AM) and red indicating dead cells (ethidium homodimer-1). Scale bar, 50 µm. C, Dose–response of erastin (left) and HCA (right) in primary cortical neurons. Representative live/dead staining are shown. Scale bar, 50 µm. D, Dose–response of erastin in DRG neurons and representative live/dead staining. Scale bar, 100 µm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Ferroptosis inhibitors abrogate ferroptosis in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). A, HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin, PCNs with 5 µM erastin or 5 mM glutamate analog HCA (all LD50) glutamate analog HCA and chemical inhibitors effective in ferroptosis were examined. Numbers show mean ± SD at representative concentration in brackets. Grayscale coding indicates the continuum from no protection in the presence of erastin (black) to maximal cell viability (white). *p < 0.05 versus erastin or glutamate analog (HCA), #p < 0.05 versus inactive analog U0124. B, C, Representative live/dead staining in HT1080 cells (B) and PCN (C) are shown, green indicating live cells (calcein AM) and red indicating dead cells (ethidium homodimer-1). Images for cycloheximide are shown in Figure 8 because it is also a criterion for apoptosis. Scale bar, 50 µm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Dose–responses of ferroptosis inhibitors in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin, PCN with 5 µM erastin or 5 mM glutamate analog HCA and chemical inhibitors effective in ferroptosis were examined. Dose–response for cycloheximide is shown in Figure 9 because it is also a criterion for apoptosis. Values represent mean ± SD, except for actinomycin D and Trolox in HT1080 cells, Ferrostatin-1, Deferoxamine, N-acetylcysteine, Trolox, and U0126 in PCN treated with erastin as well as Ferrostatin-1, Deferoxamine, N-acetylcysteine, and U0126 in PCNs treated with glutamate analog (HCA) where medians are given. *p < 0.05 versus erastin or glutamate analog (HCA), #p < 0.05 versus U0124. For exact p values refer to Figure 3-1.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Apoptosis inhibitors do not inhibit ferroptosis in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). A, HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin, PCN with 5 µM erastin or 5 mM glutamate analog HCA and chemical inhibitors effective in apoptosis were examined. Numbers show mean ± SD at representative concentration in brackets. Grayscale coding indicates the continuum from no protection in the presence of erastin (black) to maximal cell viability (white). *p < 0.05 versus erastin or glutamate analog (HCA). B, C, Representative live/dead staining in HT1080 cells (B) and PCNs (C) are shown, green indicating live cells (calcein AM) and red indicating dead cells (ethidium homodimer-1). Scale bar, 50 µm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Dose–responses of apoptosis inhibitors in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin, PCN with 5 µM erastin or 5 mM glutamate analog HCA and chemical inhibitors effective in apoptosis were examined. Values represent mean ± SD, except for cyclosporin A, SP600125, cycloheximide in HT1080 cells, cyclosporin A in PCNs treated with erastin as well as z-VAD-fmk, cyclosporin A, SB203580, SP600125 in PCNs treated with glutamate analog (HCA) where medians are given. *p < 0.05 versus erastin or glutamate analog (HCA). For exact p values refer to Figure 5-1.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Necroptosis inhibitors, but not parthanatos inhibitors, inhibit ferroptosis in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). A, HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin, PCNs with 5 µM erastin or 5 mM glutamate analog HCA and chemical inhibitors effective in necroptosis and parthanatos were examined. Numbers show mean ± SD at representative concentration in brackets. Grayscale coding indicates the continuum from no protection in the presence of erastin (black) to maximal cell viability (white). *p < 0.05 versus erastin or glutamate analog (HCA), #p < 0.05 versus Necrostatin-1i. B, C, Representative live/dead staining in HT1080 cells (B) and PCN (C) are shown, green indicating live cells (calcein AM) and red indicating dead cells (ethidium homodimer-1). Scale bar, 50 µm.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Dose–responses of parthanatos and necroptosis inhibitors in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin, PCN with 5 µM erastin or 5 mM glutamate analog HCA and chemical inhibitors effective in necroptosis and parthanatos were examined. Values represent mean ± SD, except for Necrostatin-1 and necrosulfonamide in HT1080 cells, necrosulfonamide in PCNs treated with erastin as well as Olaparib, GSK872, and necrosulfonamide in PCNs treated with glutamate analog (HCA) where medians are given. *p < 0.05 versus erastin or glutamate analog (HCA), #p < 0.05 versus Necrostatin-1i. For exact p values refer to Figure 7-1.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Autophagy inhibitors inhibit ferroptosis in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). A, HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin, PCN with 5 µM erastin or 5 mM glutamate analog HCA and chemical inhibitors effective in autophagy were examined. Numbers show mean ± SD at representative concentration in brackets. Grayscale coding indicates the continuum from no protection in the presence of erastin (black) to maximal cell viability (white). *p < 0.05 versus erastin or glutamate analog (HCA). B, C, Representative live/dead staining in HT1080 cells (B) and PCN (C) are shown, green indicating live cells (calcein AM) and red indicating dead cells (ethidium homodimer-1). Scale bar, 50 µm.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Dose–responses of autophagy inhibitors in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin, PCNs with 5 µM erastin or 5 mM glutamate analog HCA and chemical inhibitors effective in autophagy were examined. Values represent mean ± SD, except for 3-methyladenine, Bafilomycin A1, and Chloroquine in PCNs treated with erastin as well as all inhibitors in PCNs treated with glutamate analog (HCA) where medians are given. *p < 0.05 versus erastin or glutamate analog (HCA). For exact p values refer to Figure 9-1.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Ferroptosis inducer erastin and glutamate analog HCA activate necroptotic machinery. Levels of phospho-RIP1 (normalized to β-actin) were measured in HT22 cells exposed to erastin (A), glutamate analog (HCA; B) or 100 ng/ml TNFα + 5 µM z-VAD-fmk for 8 h (positive control in A and B). Necrostatin-1 served as confirmation for specificity of RIP1 kinase activity. Values represent median. *p < 0.05 versus 0 h erastin or glutamate analog (HCA), ‡p < 0.05 versus 8 h TNFα/zVAD. For exact p values refer to Figure 10-1.

  • Figure 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11.

    Systematic pharmacologic characterization reveals inhibitors of autophagy and necroptosis abrogate ferroptosis in cancer cells (HT1080) and primary cortical neurons (PCNs). A, Comparison of protection profile of chemical inhibitors between operationally defined ferroptosis (Dixon et al., 2012, 2014), erastin-induced toxicity in HT1080 cells at toxicologically meaningful dose, erastin and glutamate analog (HCA) in PCNs and previously published hemin toxicity in PCNs (Zille et al., 2017). B, Statistical analysis of profile of chemical inhibitors between operationally defined ferroptosis and erastin-induced toxicity in HT1080 revealed that they are statistically similar, but major differences (i.e., protection by inhibitors of autophagy and necroptosis) exist. Statistical analysis showed no difference between erastin treatment in PCNs and HT1080 cells, erastin- and glutamate analog (HCA)-treated PCNs or erastin in HT1080 cells and HCA in PCNs.

  • Figure 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 12.

    Do inhibitors of HCA-induced death in neurons prevent ferroptosis in cancer cells? A, HT1080 cells were treated with 1 µM erastin (LD50) and chemical inhibitors effective in glutamate analog (HCA)-induced neuronal toxicity (values from published work and references indicated in last 2 columns) were examined. Numbers show mean ± SD at representative concentration in brackets. Grayscale coding indicates the continuum from no protection in the presence of erastin (black) to maximal cell viability (white). *p < 0.05 versus erastin, #p < 0.05 versus Nullscript (negative control). B, Representative live/dead staining are shown, green indicating live cells (calcein AM) and red indicating dead cells (ethidium homodimer-1). Scale bar, 50 µm.

  • Figure 13.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 13.

    Protective effect of inhibitors of neuronal toxicity of glutamate analog (HCA) in erastin-induced death in HT1080 cells. A, Dose–responses of chemical inhibitors effective in HCA-induced neuronal toxicity. Values represent mean ± SD, except for Adaptaquin, Apicidin, and Scriptaid, where medians are given. *p < 0.05 versus erastin. B, Gene expression levels of Mithramycin target genes c-Myc and p21 were assessed in HT1080 cells exposed to 50 or 300 nm Mithramycin. Values represent medians. *p = 0.009 versus vehicle. C, Dose–responses of Scriptaid and Nullscript (negative control) in erastin-induced cell death in primary cortical neurons (PCNs). Values represent mean ± SD, *p < 0.05 versus erastin, #p < 0.05 versus Nullscript (negative control). D, Protein levels of acetylated and total histone H4 were assessed in HT1080 cells exposed to Scriptaid or its inactive analog Nullscript. E, Gene expression of HDACs from class I in PCNs versus HT1080 cells. Values represent medians. *p < 0.0125 versus PCNs. For exact p values refer to Figures 13-1, 13-2, 13-3, and 13-4.

  • Figure 14.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 14.

    Dose–responses of erastin and Scriptaid in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma and Hep3B hepatocellular carcinoma cells. SH-SY5Y (A) and Hep3B cells (B) were treated with increasing dose of erastin to determine the LD50 that was subsequently used to assess whether Scriptaid exacerbated erastin-induced toxicity. Nullscript was used as structural analog (negative control). Values represent mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 versus erastin, #p < 0.05 versus Nullscript. For exact p values refer to Figure 14-1.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Figure 3-1

    Statistical data on ferroptosis inhibitors in HT1080 cells and primary cortical neurons. Download Figure 3-1, DOCX file.

  • Figure 5-1

    Statistical data on apoptosis inhibitors in HT1080 cells and primary cortical neurons. Download Figure 5-1, DOCX file.

  • Figure 7-1

    Statistical data on parthanatos and necroptosis inhibitors in HT1080 cells and primary cortical neurons. Download Figure 7-1, DOCX file.

  • Figure 9-1

    Statistical data on autophagy inhibitors in HT1080 cells and primary cortical neurons. Download Figure 9-1, DOCX file.

  • Figure 10-1

    Statistical data on levels of pRIP1 in erastin- and glutamate analog (HCA)-induced cell death. Download Figure 10-1, DOCX file.

  • Figure 13-1

    Statistical data on cell death inhibitors in erastin-induced cell death in HT1080 cells. Download Figure 13-1, DOCX file.

  • Figure 13-2

    Statistical data on gene expression after mithramycin treatment in HT1080 cells. Download Figure 13-2, DOCX file.

  • Figure 13-3

    Statistical data on Scriptaid and Nullscript in erastin-induced death in primary cortical neurons. Download Figure 13-3, DOCX file.

  • Figure 13-4

    Statistical data on HDAC gene expression in primary cortical neurons versus HT1080 cells. Download Figure 13-4, DOCX file.

  • Figure 14-1

    Statistical data on Scriptaid in erastin-induced cell death in SH-SY5Y and Hep3B cells. Download Figure 14-1, DOCX file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 6 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 6, Issue 1
January/February 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ferroptosis in Neurons and Cancer Cells Is Similar But Differentially Regulated by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Ferroptosis in Neurons and Cancer Cells Is Similar But Differentially Regulated by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
Marietta Zille, Amit Kumar, Nandini Kundu, Megan W. Bourassa, Victor S. C. Wong, Dianna Willis, Saravanan S. Karuppagounder, Rajiv R. Ratan
eNeuro 31 January 2019, 6 (1) ENEURO.0263-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0263-18.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Ferroptosis in Neurons and Cancer Cells Is Similar But Differentially Regulated by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
Marietta Zille, Amit Kumar, Nandini Kundu, Megan W. Bourassa, Victor S. C. Wong, Dianna Willis, Saravanan S. Karuppagounder, Rajiv R. Ratan
eNeuro 31 January 2019, 6 (1) ENEURO.0263-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0263-18.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • apoptosis
  • cell death
  • chemotherapy
  • ferroptosis
  • necroptosis
  • necrosis

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Altered PI3K/mTOR signaling within the forebrain leads to respiratory deficits in a mouse model of epilepsy
  • Lack of ADAP1/Centaurin-α1 Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment and Neuropathological Hallmarks in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
  • The Ventral Pallidum Innervates a Distinct Subset of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.