Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNegative Results, Sensory and Motor Systems

Centrifugal Innervation of the Olfactory Bulb: A Reappraisal

Estelle E. in ’t Zandt, Hillary L. Cansler, Heather B. Denson and Daniel W. Wesson
eNeuro 28 January 2019, 6 (1) ENEURO.0390-18.2019; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0390-18.2019
Estelle E. in ’t Zandt
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2Center for Smell and Taste, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hillary L. Cansler
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2Center for Smell and Taste, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hillary L. Cansler
Heather B. Denson
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2Center for Smell and Taste, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel W. Wesson
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2Center for Smell and Taste, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel W. Wesson
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Timeline of methods and experimental groups. Three groups of mice were used in three different experimental paradigms. A, C57BL/6J mice received retrobead injections into the OB and were perfused at 2 d. B, C57BL/6J mice received AAVretro-GFP injections into the OB and were perfused at two weeks. C, Transgenic Ai9 reporter mice received AAVretro-Cre injections and were perfused at two weeks; *three of nine Ai9 mice received multiple injections of AAVretro-Cre throughout one OB (see Materials and Methods; Table 1).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Representative results from semi-automated cell-counting procedures. A, Representative results from semi-automated quantification of retrobead-labeled cells in aPCX. RB, retrobead. Bi, Representative results from semi-automated quantification of retrobead-labeled cells in the OT. Bii, Same section as shown in Bi, as a focused z-stack, indicating that many cells counted were likely non-neuronal fluorescent puncta. Z-stack included six steps, with 4 μm between each step. C, Representative results from semi-automated quantification of GFP-labeled cells in the aPCX following injection of AAVretro-GFP in the OB. D, Representative results from semi-automated quantification of tdTomato-labeled cells in the aPCX following injection of AAVretro-Cre in the OB. Arrows indicate counted cells. Boxed region indicates ROI used for quantification. All scale bars = 100 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Retrobead injections to the OB indicate lack of OT to OB innervation. A, OB injection site. Dotted line indicates the glomerular layer. Scale bar = 500 μm. B, Retrobead labeling in the AON following OB injection. Box indicates region in D. Scale bar = 200 μm. C, aPCX and OT retrobead labeling. Boxes indicate regions in E, F. Scale bar = 500 μm. D, Enhanced view of boxed AON region in B. Scale bar = 100 μm. E, Enhanced view of boxed aPCX region in C. Scale bar = 100 μm. F, Enhanced view of boxed OT region in C. Scale bar = 100 μm. G, Estimated number of retrobead-labeled cells across all three brain regions. Each point represents one animal’s mean; n = 6 mice, four to six sections (4.78 ± 0.19; mean ± SEM) each. i.–iii., layers 1–3; D, dorsal; M, medial; L, lateral.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    AAVretro-GFP tracing further supports lack of OT to OB innervation. A, OB injection site. Dotted line indicates the glomerular layer. Scale bar = 500 μm. B, AON GFP labeling following injection of AAVretro-GFP in the OB. Box indicates region in Figure 3D. Scale bar = 500 μm. C, aPCX and OT GFP labeling following injection of AAVretro-GFP in the OB. Boxes indicate regions in Figure 3E,F. Scale bar = 500 μm. D, Enhanced view of boxed AON region in B. Scale bar = 100 μm. E, Enhanced view of boxed aPCX region in C. Scale bar = 100 μm. F, Enhanced view of boxed OT region in C. Scale bar = 100 μm. G, Quantification of GFP-labeled cells across all three brain regions. Each point represents one animal’s mean; n = 6 mice, 4–12 sections (6.89 ± 0.54; mean ± SEM) each. H, GFP labeling in the OT following injection of AAVretro-GFP in the OT; n = 2 mice. VP, ventral pallidum; ICj, islands of Calleja; ICj, borders were approximated based on DAPI staining. Scale bar = 100 μm. i.–iii., layers 1–3; D, dorsal; M, medial; L, lateral.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    AAVretro-Cre tracing in Ai9 reporter mouse verifies lack of OT to OB innervation. A, OB injection site. Dotted line indicates the glomerular layer. Scale bar = 500 μm. B, AON tdTomato labeling following injection of AAVretro-Cre in the OB of Ai9 mouse. Box indicates region in Figure 4D. Scale bar = 500 μm. C, aPCX and OT tdTomato labeling following injection of AAVretro-Cre in the OB of Ai9 mouse. Boxes indicate regions in Figure 4E,F. Scale bar = 500 μm. D, Enhanced view of boxed AON region in B. Scale bar = 100 μm. E, Enhanced view of boxed aPCX region in B. Scale bar = 100 μm. F, Enhanced view of boxed OT region in C. Scale bar = 100 μm. G, Quantification of tdTomato-labeled cells across all the three brain regions. Each point represents one animal’s mean; n = 4 mice, 5–13 sections/mouse (9.5 ± 0.68; mean ± SEM). H, OT neurons labeled following injection of AAVretro-Cre in the OT of Ai9 mouse; n = 2 mice. VP, ventral pallidum; ICj, islands of Calleja. ICj borders were approximated based on DAPI staining. Scale bar = 100 μm. i.–iii., layers 1–3; D, dorsal; M, medial; L, lateral.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Multiple injections of AAVretro-Cre in the OB of Ai9 reporter mouse reveals labeling in numerous OB-projecting structures, but not the OT. A, OB injection site. Dotted line indicates the glomerular layer. Scale bar = 500 μm. B, Intact brain following multiple injections of AAVretro-Cre in the OB of Ai9 reporter mouse shows strong tdTomato labeling in one OB and the PCX, but not the OT. Dotted line indicates the OT. Scale bar = 1 mm. C, aPCX and OT tdTomato labeling following injection of AAVretro-Cre in the OB of Ai9 mouse. Scale bar = 500 μm. D–K, tdTomato labeling in many regions following injection of AAVretro-Cre in the OB of Ai9 mouse. All scale bars = 100 μm. D, AON. E, Horizontal diagonal band of Broca (HDB) and magnocellular preoptic nucleus (MCPO). F, Posterior PCX (pPCX). G, Lateral hypothalamus (LH). H, Basolateral amygdala (BLA). I, Median raphe nucleus (MnR) and paramedian raphe nucleus (PMnR). J, Dorsal raphe nucleus (DR). K, Locus coeruleus (LC). f, fornix; ns, nigrostriatal bundle; IP, interpeduncular nucleus; VLPAG, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray; Su3, supraoculomotor cap; MPB, medial parabrachial nucleus; Bar, Barrington’s nucleus. i.–iii., layers 1–3; D, dorsal; M, medial; L, lateral; n = 3 mice.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Revised model for centrifugal inputs to the OB. The AON, aPCX, and OT receive input from the OB. The AON and aPCX send centrifugal input back to the OB, but based on our data, the OT does not.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of all injections

    StrainnInjected withInjection siteInjection amountFigure
    C57BL/6J4 (3 M, 1 F)RetrobeadsOB (dispersed between 2400 and 800 μm ventral)900 nl2A–C, 3
    C57BL/6J2 MRetrobeadsOB200 nl2A–C, 3
    C57BL/6J7 MAAVretro-GFPOB200 nl2D, 4A–G
    C57BL/6J2 MAAVretro-GFPOT500 nl4H
    Ai96 MAAVretro-CreOB200 nl2E, 5A–G
    Ai91 M, 1 FAAVretro-CreOT500 nl5H
    Ai91 M, 2 sFAAVretro-CreOB (1, 1.5, and 2 mm anterior the rhinal sinus, 1 mm lateral, 1.5 mm ventral)200 nl × 3 sites = 600 nl total6
    • Unless otherwise noted, OB injections were given at 1.5 mm anterior the rhinal sinus, 1 mm lateral, and 1.5 mm ventral, and OT injections were given at 1.5 mm anterior bregma, 1.2 mm lateral, and 4.8 mm ventral.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 6 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 6, Issue 1
January/February 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Centrifugal Innervation of the Olfactory Bulb: A Reappraisal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Centrifugal Innervation of the Olfactory Bulb: A Reappraisal
Estelle E. in ’t Zandt, Hillary L. Cansler, Heather B. Denson, Daniel W. Wesson
eNeuro 28 January 2019, 6 (1) ENEURO.0390-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0390-18.2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Centrifugal Innervation of the Olfactory Bulb: A Reappraisal
Estelle E. in ’t Zandt, Hillary L. Cansler, Heather B. Denson, Daniel W. Wesson
eNeuro 28 January 2019, 6 (1) ENEURO.0390-18.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0390-18.2019
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • centrifugal innervations
  • olfactory bulb
  • olfactory system
  • olfactory tubercle

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Negative Results

  • Closed-Loop Acoustic Stimulation Enhances Sleep Oscillations But Not Memory Performance
  • Cyfip1 Haploinsufficiency Does Not Alter GABAA Receptor δ-Subunit Expression and Tonic Inhibition in Dentate Gyrus PV+ Interneurons and Granule Cells
  • Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment Does Not Reduce Abuse-Related Effects of Opioid Drugs
Show more Negative Results

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Sensory-cell population integrity required to preserve minimal and normal vestibulo-ocular reflexes reveals the critical role of type I hair cells in canal- and otolith-specific functions
  • Independent Encoding of Orientation and Mean Luminance by Mouse Visual Cortex
  • Different But Complementary Motor Functions Reveal an Asymmetric Recalibration of Upper Limb Bimanual Coordination
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.