Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Menthol Stereoisomers Exhibit Different Effects on α4β2 nAChR Upregulation and Dopamine Neuron Spontaneous Firing

Brandon J. Henderson, Stephen Grant, Betty K. Wong, Rezvan Shahoei, Stephanie M. Huard, Shyam S. M. Saladi, Emad Tajkhorshid, Dennis A. Dougherty and Henry A. Lester
eNeuro 21 December 2018, 5 (6) ENEURO.0465-18.2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0465-18.2018
Brandon J. Henderson
1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25703
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brandon J. Henderson
Stephen Grant
3Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen Grant
Betty K. Wong
1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rezvan Shahoei
4Department of Physics, National Institutes of Health Center for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie M. Huard
1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephanie M. Huard
Shyam S. M. Saladi
3Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emad Tajkhorshid
5Department of Biochemistry, National Institutes of Health Center for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis A. Dougherty
3Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry A. Lester
1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Henry A. Lester
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Movies
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Chronic exposure of menthol stereoisomers causes different effects on α4β2 nAChR upregulation. A, Representative TIRFM images of neuro-2a cells transfected with α4-SEP and β2 nAChR subunits. Menthol stereoisomers (500 nm) were added 24 h before imaging sessions. Scale bars, 10 µm. Each panel image shows representative cells at pH 7.4. B, PMRID was quantified for SEP nAChRs following treatment with menthol stereoisomers. For each condition, n > 30 cells. Data are the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey). Two-way ANOVA, (+)-menthol vs (−)-menthol, F(1,381) = 30.34 and p < 0.0001. Exact p values are provided in the text.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Menthol stereoisomers cause different effects on dopamine neuron baseline firing frequency. A1, B1, Representative image of a TH-positive cultured midbrain dopamine neuron (A1) and a TH-negative putative GABA neuron (B1). Scale bars, 20 µm. A2, B2, Representative waveforms of a TH-positive dopamine neuron with Ih (A2) and a TH-negative putative GABA neuron without Ih (B2). A3, B3, B4, Representative action potential from cultured dopamine and GABA neurons. C, Baseline firing frequency of TH-positive dopamine neurons treated with control, (+)-menthol, or (−)-menthol (500 nm, each) for 10 d. Data are the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (one way ANOVA with Tukey). Circles overlaid with bars represent individual recordings that constitute the mean value for each respective group (n = 17, 44, and 19 for control, (+)-menthol, and (−)-menthol, respectively). Exact p values are provided in the text. Full data are plotted as a scatterplot with mean ± SEM values plotted as an overlaid bar chart. D, Representative whole-cell current-clamp traces for TH-positive dopamine neurons treated with control or menthol stereoisomers. E1–E3, 9% of the (+)-menthol-treated dopamine neurons displayed dramatic variances in firing frequency. E2 and E3 are magnifications of blue and orange boxes, respectively, in E1.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Chronic treatment with menthol stereoisomers causes different effects on dopamine neuron excitability. A1, A2, Representative image of TH-positive dopamine neuron with a diagram of the typical placement of patch and puffer pipets. B1–B3, Representative whole-cell current-clamp recordings from TH-positive dopamine neurons treated with control, (+)-menthol, or (−)-menthol (500 nm each) for 10 d. Arrows indicate a 300 ms application of 300 µm ACh to stimulate nAChRs. C1–C3, Mean firing frequency over time plot of TH-positive dopamine neurons before and after the ACh puff (indicated by arrow). C4, Quantification of firing frequency of dopamine neurons for the 3 s after ACh puff. Data are the mean ± SEM. n = 5–9 TH-positive dopamine neurons.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Acute applications display only slight pharmacological differences among menthol stereoisomers. A, Concentration–response curves of ACh on oocytes injected with α4 and β2 nAChR subunits. Injections were biased to assemble high-sensitivity (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs (1:10) or low-sensitivity (α4)3(β2)2) nAChRs (10:1). B1, B2, Concentration–response curve of menthol stereoisomers with high sensitivity (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs (B1) or low sensitivity (α4)3(β2)2 nAChRs (B2). C1, C2, Concentration–response curve of ACh in the absence or presence of (−)-menthol or (+)-menthol (50 µm) with high sensitivity (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs (C1) or low sensitivity (α4)3(β2)2 nAChRs (C2). Refer to Tables 1–3 for values for Hill coefficient, EC50, and IC50.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    α4L9´ mutations probe the putative binding site of menthol. A1, A2, Concentration–response curves for menthol against (α4[L9´X])2(β2)3, where X is any amino acid. Each receptor is activated by its respective EC50 dose of ACh (A1) (−)-menthol and (A2) (+)-menthol. B, Concentration–response curves for (α4[L9´X])3(β2)2 and (α4)3(β2)2 using 1 µm ACh. C, Comparing the percentage maximum current induced when the oocyte is exposed to 100 µm menthol. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005; ****p < 0.001. Exact p values are provided in extended data (Fig. 5-1). D1, Comparing the IC50 values. In this plot, (α4[L9´A])2(β2)3 is omitted because at no tested concentration of menthol was the receptor inhibited 50%. D2, Plot of IC30 values comparing (+)-menthol and (−)-menthol; n = 6–18 oocytes.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A, The ratio of currents elicited by an EC50 concentration of ACh and 100 µm menthol over the current elicited by ACh alone. Error bars represent the SEM; n = 7-33 oocytes. B, Average Hill coefficients for wild-type and all mutant α4β2 mutants tested (p = 0.07). Error bars represent the SD; n = 7-39 mutants

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Potency of menthol depends on L9´ residue size. A1–B2, Plot of IC40 for (−)-menthol versus residue length (A1) or residue volume (B1) and plot of IC30 for (+)-menthol versus residue length (A2) or residue volume (B2). C1, Fitting the IC40 values for (−)-menthol against the reduced AA index. C2, Fitting the IC30 values for (+)-menthol against the reduced AA index. R 2 values in C1 and C2 for each parameter are indicated in extended Figures 7-1 and 7-2. D, Concentration–response relationship for (−)-menthol on (α4[L9´I])3(β2)2 and (α4[L9´O-Me-Thr])3(β2)2 nAChRs. Structures of the two amino acids are shown to the left along with their end-to-end length; n = 7–18 oocytes.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Movies
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Concentration–response relationships of ACh on (α4)3(β2)2 and (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs

    nHEC50 (μm)nImax (μA)
    1:10 (α4)2(β2)31.54 ± 0.0893.4 ± 3.34100.3 – 1.1
    10:1 (α4)3(β2)21.27 ± 0.100.62 ± 0.04150.2 – 13.6
    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Concentration–response relationships of menthol stereoisomers on (α4)3(β2)2 and (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs

    nHIC50 (μm)nImax (μA)
    1:10 (α4)2(β2)3 a
        (–)-Menthol−0.71 ± 0.0244.9 ± 1.62100.08–1.34
        (+)-Menthol−0.90 ± 0.0348.3 ± 1.67c100.12–0.97
    10:1 (α4)3(β2)2 b
        (–)-Menthol−0.81 ± 0.0333.1 ± 1.83100.09–1.30
        (+)-Menthol−0.85 ± 0.0345.5 ± 2.03d100.13–1.37
    • ↵a Stimulated with 2 µm ACh.

    • ↵b Stimulated with 100 µm ACh.

    • ↵c p = 0.033, IC50 of (−)-menthol vs. (+)-menthol on (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs.

    • ↵d p = 0.0001, IC50 of (−)-menthol vs. (+)-menthol on (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Concentration–response of ACh in the absence and presence of menthol stereoisomers on (α4)3(β2)2 and (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs

    ReceptornHIC50 (μm)nImax (μA)
    1:10 (α4)2(β2)3 a
        ACh only1.27 ± 0.050.61 ± 0.0205150.04–1.05
        With (–)-menthol1.38 ± 0.080.66 ± 0.0318120.05–0.82
        With (+)-menthol1.51 ± 0.100.64 ± 0.0321150.03–0.85
    10:1 (α4)3(β2)2 b
        ACh only1.74 ± 0.0799.8 ± 2.37190.2–13.6
        With (–)-menthol1.58 ± 0.04120.8 ± 2.37180.1–9.9
        With (+)-menthol1.56 ± 0.04126.4 ± 2.52190.1–9.3
    • ↵a Stimulated with 2 µm ACh.

    • ↵b Stimulated with 100 µm ACh.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    IC40 values for (−)-menthol on (α4[L9´X])2(β2)3 mutant nAChRs

    ResidueIC30 (µm (+)-menthol ± SEM)n
    Ala855 ± 13018
    Ser357 ± 62.011
    Gln117 ± 14.013
    Thr547 ± 11011
    Cys162 ± 23.011
    Ile50.1 ± 11.07
    Met18.4 ± 1.6010
    Leu (WT)35.6 ± 5.709
    Phe121 ± 10.010
    Trp26.6 ± 4.9010
    • View popup
    Table 5:

    IC30 values for (+)-menthol on (α4[L9´X])2(β2)3 mutant nAChRs

    ResidueIC30 (µm (+)-menthol ± SEM)n
    Ala760 ± 1009
    Ser215 ± 41.011
    Gln114 ± 12.010
    Thr475 ± 47.09
    Cys108 ± 28.011
    Ile70.4 ± 18.09
    Met15.6 ± 5.5015
    Leu (WT)27.1 ± 4.508
    Phe60.0 ± 12.08
    Trp11.3 ± 1.6018
    • View popup
    Table 6:

    EC50 values for mutant α4β2 nAChRs

    MotivationMutantEC50 (µm ACh) ± SEMHill coefficient ± SEM
    WT-LS(α4[wt])3(β2[wt])283.4 ± 4.670.905 ± 0.03
    WT-HS(α4[wt])2(β2[wt])30.924 ± 0.06560.924 ± 0.1
    WT-α5α5[wt](α4[wt]β2[wt])20.409 ± 0.04181.06 ± 0.1
    9´ residue(α4[L9´A])2(β2[wt])30.499 ± 0.0321.43 ± 0.1
    9´ residue(α4[L9´S])2(β2[wt])30.0356 ± 0.001451.29 ± 0.06
    9´ residue(α4[L9´I])2(β2[wt])3960. ± 5020.489 ± 0.03
    9´ residue(α4[L9´T])2(β2[wt])30.282 ± 0.02331.28 ± 0.1
    9´ residue(α4[L9´Q])2(β2[wt])30.530 ± 0.01361.284 ± 0.03
    9´ residue(α4[L9´C])2(β2[wt])32.68 ± 0.3110.710 ± 0.1
    9´ residueα4[L9´F])2(β2[wt])30.547 ± 0.02091.26 ± 0.05
    9´ residue(α4[L9´W])2(β2[wt])30.240 ± 0.009061.19 ± 0.05
    GABA(α4[L376W])3(β2[wt])2247 ± 99.40.772 ± 0.1
    MD(α4[V356A])3(β2[wt])2244 ± 1130.843 ± 0.2
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[M305W])2180. ± 38.20.938 ± 0.1
    MD(α4[wt])3(β2[W355L])2171 ± 28.01.04 ± 0.1
    MD(α4[W363L])3(β2[wt])2159 ± 55.20.941 ± 0.2
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[G364L])2153 ± 1640.728 ± 0.3
    TRPM8(α4[L383A])3(β2[wt])2150. ± 7.670.919 ± 0.03
    TRPM8(α4[wt])3(β2[R299A])2140. ± 64.70.510 ± 0.05
    MD(α4[I357A])3(β2[wt])2124 ± 19.10.957 ± 0.09
    MD(α4[W363L])3(β2[W355L])2122 ± 11.61.31 ± 0.1
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[F306W])2106 ± 12.21.07 ± 0.1
    ADNFLE(α4[S6'F])3(β2[wt])2105 ± 47.51.27 ± 0.1
    MD(α4[F299A])3(β2[wt])283.2 ± 7.351.22 ± 0.1
    9´ residue(α4[L9´O-Me-Thr])3(β2[wt])261.3 ± 4.641.07 ± 0.07
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[L282W])277.5 ± 6.441.01 ± 0.06
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[V360W])271.2 ± 5.791.24 ± 0.1
    GABA(α4[M288W])3(β2[wt])270.8 ± 11.10.913 ± 0.1
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[M280W])257.8 ± 6.941.29 ± 0.2
    ADNFLE(α4[wt])3(β2[V287L])238.0 ± 23.80.493 ± 0.07
    Docking(α4[G281A, V236A])3(β2[wt])228.1 ± 4.840.998 ± 0.1
    Docking(α4[wt])3(β2[I218A,L257A])226.6 ± 3.650.862 ± 0.08
    Docking + GABA(α4[G281A, V236A])3(β2[M368W])224.3 ± 5.550.629 ± 0.07
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[Y275W])221.1 ± 6.750.988 ± 0.1
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[M368W])21.58 ± 0.5080.493 ± 0.09
    MD + GABA(α4[V356W])3(β2[M368W])21.46 ± 0.2191.56 ± 0.3
    # 9´Aα5[V9´A](α4[wt]β2[wt])20.818 ± 0.01780.818 ± 0.03
    ADNFLE(α4[S10'L])3(β2[wt])20.671 ± 0.1120.512 ± 0.04
    MD + GABA(α4[F299W, L376W])3(β2[M368W])20.511 ± 0.02931.39 ± 0.09
    MD(α4[F299W])3(β2[wt])20.508 ± 0.03091.20 ± 0.07
    MD + GABA(α4[L376W])3(β2[M368W])20.504 ± 0.07111.41 ± 0.2
    9´ residue(α4[L9´M])3(β2[wt])20.503 ± 0.06630.585 ± 0.04
    MD + GABA(α4[F299W])3(β2[M368W])20.486 ± 0.04341.25 ± 0.1
    9´ residue(α4[L9´M])2(β2[wt])30.380 ± 0.03071.22 ± 0.1
    MD(α4[V356W])3(β2[wt])20.360 ± 0.01881.65 ± 0.1
    9´ residue + GABA(α4[L9´A])3(β2[M368W])20.0230 ± 0.002000.900 ± 0.06
    # 9´A(α4[wt])3(β2[L9´A])20.0695 ± 0.003531.32 ± 0.07
    9´ residue(α4[L9´T])3(β2[wt])20.0981 ± 0.007290.995 ± 0.06
    9´ residue(α4[L9´I])3(β2[wt])2160. ± 50.30.866 ± 0.1
    9´ residue(α4[wt])2(β2[L9´A])30.0197 ± 0.001631.12 ± 0.09
    9´ residue(α4[L9´A])3(β2[wt])20.0159 ± 0.0006911.16 ± 0.05
    9´ residue + MD(α4[L9´A])3(β2[V360W])20.00352 ± 0.0002901.19 ± 0.1
    9´ residue + MD(α4[L9´A])3(β2[F328W])20.00318 ± 0.0002371.13 ± 0.08
    ACh Binding Site(α4[H116V,Q124F,T126L])3(β2[wt])276.3 ± 1.851.63 ± 0.06
    Intra-subunit(α4[C233A])3(β2[wt])2143 ± 17.20.99 ± 0.08
    Intra-subunit(α4[T235A])3(β2[wt])243.6 ± 3.891.10 ± 0.09
    Intra-subunit(α4[V236A])3(β2[wt])276.2 ± 14.21.31 ± 0.3
    Intra-subunit(α4[G281F])3(β2[wt])233.5 ± 9.871.49 ± 0.6
    Intra-subunit(α4[S232A])3(β2[wt])2162 ± 20.60.993 ± 0.08
    Intra-subunit(α4[G281A])3(β2[wt])219.9 ± 1.471.49 ± 0.2
    Near Cys loop(α4[E52L])3(β2[wt])233.3 ± 2.711.27 ± 0.1
    Near Cys loop(α4[E182Q])3(β2[wt])263.5 ± 4.541.66 ± 0.2
    Near Cys loop(α4[wt])3(β2[S44A])286.1 ± 8.211.70 ± 0.3
    Channel pore(α4[L265A])3(β2[wt])226.5 ± 6.580.864 ± 0.2
    Channel pore(α4[wt])3(β2[L257A])20.316 ± 0.1011.31 ± 0.4
    Interfacial(α4[F286A])3(β2[wt])246.5 ± 8.450.962 ± 0.1
    Interfacial(α4[wt])3(β2[I218A])2119 ± 11.71.21 ± 0.1
    Interfacial(α4[G281A])3(β2[I218A])223.8 ± 2.280.868 ± 0.5
    • WT-LS, Wild-type α4β2 receptor with the low sensitivity stoichiometry; WT-HS, wild-type α4β2 receptor with the high sensitivity stoichiometry; WT-α5, wild-type α4β2 receptor with α5 in the auxiliary position; 9´ residue, a mutant at the 9´ position to probe the effects of mutations at this site; GABA, analogous site for the menthol binding site in the GABA receptor; MD, molecular dynamics predicted position; TRPM8, analogous site for the menthol binding site on the TRPM8 receptor; ANDFLE, a mutant that is found in ADNFLE patients; Docking, position predicted by preliminary docking studies; #L9´A, mutant made to probe the effects that the number of 9´A mutations has on the effects of menthol; ACh binding site, the putative ACh binding site; Intra-subunit, site between subunits in the transmembrane domain of α4β2; Near Cys loop, site that is near the Cys loop of α4β2; Channel pore, site that is in the channel pore of α4β2; Interfacial, a site on the transmembrane domain of a single subunit that faces toward the other transmembrane domain helices on the same subunit.

    • View popup
    Table 7:

    IC50 values for mutant α4β2 nAChRs

    MotivationMutantIC50 (µm (−)-menthol) ± SEMHill coefficient ± SEMMaximum inhibition (%)
    WT-LS(α4[wt])3(β2[wt])233.7 ± 1.160.952 ± 0.0495
    WT-HS(α4[wt])2(β2[wt])333.9 ± 7.400.481 ± 0.171
    WT-α5α5[wt](α4[wt]β2[wt])251.0 ± 9.060.593 ± 0.253
    9´ residue(α4[L9´A])2(β2[wt])3114 ± 1520.779 ± 0.245
    9´ residue(α4[L9´S])2(β2[wt])3514 ± 3610.740 ± 0.165
    9´ residue(α4[L9´I])2(β2[wt])397.3 ± 38.50.836 ± 0.279
    9´ residue(α4[L9´T])2(β2[wt])3717 ± 770.0.946 ± 0.359
    9´ residue(α4[L9´Q])2(β2[wt])3165 ± 28.11.03 ± 0.181
    9´ residue(α4[L9´C])2(β2[wt])3306 ± 1730.744 ± 0.165
    9´ residueα4[L9´F])2(β2[wt])3211 ± 75.61.01 ± 0.172
    9´ residue(α4[L9´W])2(β2[wt])328.8 ± 3.260.917 ± 0.187
    GABA(α4[L376W])3(β2[wt])217.4 ± 43.22.38 ± 1.692
    MD(α4[V356A])3(β2[wt])229.6 ± 11.00.631 ± 0.280
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[M305W])270.6 ± 29.90.872 ± 0.290
    MD(α4[wt])3(β2[W355L])228.8 ± 24.60.589 ± 0.480
    MD(α4[W363L])3(β2[wt])242.7 ± 9.371.02 ± 0.296
    TRPM8(α4[L383A])3(β2[wt])227.9 ± 4.970.828 ± 0.196
    TRPM8(α4[wt])3(β2[R299A])252.0 ± 5.891.30 ± 0.296
    MD(α4[I357A])3(β2[wt])231.4 ± 6.231.30 ± 0.394
    MD(α4[W363L])3(β2[W355L])228.4 ± 6.960.866 ± 0.291
    ADNFLE(α4[S6'F])3(β2[wt])232.3 ± 6.051.19 ± 0.395
    MD(α4[F299A])3(β2[wt])220.4 ± 10.40.548 ± 0.293
    9´ residue(α4[L9´O-Me-Thr])3(β2[wt])2135.9 ± 20.90.883 ± 0.779
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[L282W])226.1 ± 5.400.883 ± 0.197
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[V360W])216.7 ± 1.371.08 ± 0.0996
    ADNFLE(α4[wt])3(β2[V287L])217.0 ± 5.670.766 ± 0.289
    Docking(α4[G281A, V236A])3(β2[wt])211.0 ± 0.7670.958 ± 0.0696
    Docking(α4[wt])3(β2[I218A,L257A])223.0 ± 2.681.57 ± 0.399
    Docking + GABA(α4[G281A, V236A])3(β2[M368W])259.5 ± 15.20.891 ± 0.295
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[Y275W])221.7 ± 5.211.06 ± 0.297
    GABA(α4[wt])3(β2[M368W])257.8 ± 8.070.865 ± 0.0993
    # 9´Aα5[V9´A](α4[wt]β2[wt])21750 ± 33600.907 ± 0.336
    ADNFLE(α4[S10'L])3(β2[wt])229.4 ± 4.321.39 ± 0.297
    MD + GABA(α4[F299W, L376W])3(β2[M368W])2107 ± 7.071.07 ± 0.0694
    MD(α4[F299W])3(β2[wt])232.5 ± 9.350.604 ± 0.0987
    MD + GABA(α4[L376W])3(β2[M368W])2107 ± 29.60.890 ± 0.287
    9´ residue(α4[L9´M])3(β2[wt])239.2 ± 7.980.848 ± 0.0983
    MD + GABA(α4[F299W])3(β2[M368W])292.5 ± 36.80.777 ± 0.279
    9´ residue(α4[L9´M])2(β2[wt])326.6 ± 1.901.04 ± 0.0791
    MD(α4[V356W])3(β2[wt])252.6 ± 43.60.599 ± 0.270
    # 9´A(α4[wt])3(β2[L9´A])21920 ± 96200.807 ± 0.638
    9´ residue(α4[L9´I])3(β2[wt])2127 ± 29.10.947 ± 0.184
    9´ residue(α4[wt])2(β2[L9´A])33030 ± 24800.832 ± 0.831
    ACh binding site(α4[H116V,Q124F,T126L])3(β2[wt])264.4 ± 2.091.20 ± 0.0590
    Intra-subunit(α4[C233A])3(β2[wt])246.1 ± 6.431.53 ± 0.398
    Intra-subunit(α4[T235A])3(β2[wt])266.6 ± 8.031.60 ± 0.397
    Intra-subunit(α4[V236A])3(β2[wt])258.9 ± 10.01.79 ± 0.491
    Intra-subunit(α4[G281F])3(β2[wt])2108 ± 19.11.14 ± 0.299
    Intra-subunit(α4[S232A])3(β2[wt])292.0 ± 26.71.64 ± 0.792
    Intra-subunit(α4[G281A])3(β2[wt])225.6 ± 1.431.49 ± 0.199
    Near Cys Loop(α4[E52L])3(β2[wt])222.7 ± 1.670.969 ± 0.0796
    Near Cys loop(α4[E182Q])3(β2[wt])224.3 ± 0.5931.23 ± 0.0481
    Near Cys loop(α4[wt])3(β2[S44A])259.9 ± 5.092.74 ± 0.694
    Channel pore(α4[L265A])3(β2[wt])221.1 ± 3.061.16 ± 0.297
    Channel pore(α4[wt])3(β2[L257A])274.8 ± 15.61.36 ± 0.398
    Interfacial(α4[F286A])3(β2[wt])254.2 ± 19.90.927 ± 0.387
    Interfacial(α4[wt])3(β2[I218A])260.9 ± 7.631.12 ± 0.199
    Interfacial(α4[G281A])3(β2[I218A])223.8 ± 1.582.25 ± 0.399
    • WT-LS, Wild-type α4β2 receptor with the low sensitivity stoichiometry; WT-HS, wild-type α4β2 receptor with the high sensitivity stoichiometry; WT-α5, wild-type α4β2 receptor with α5 in the auxiliary position; 9´ residue, a mutant at the 9´ position to probe the effects of mutations at this site; GABA, analogous site for the menthol binding site in the GABA receptor; MD, molecular dynamics predicted position; TRPM8, analogous site for the menthol binding site on the TRPM8 receptor; ANDFLE, a mutant that is found in ADNFLE patients; Docking, position predicted by preliminary docking studies; #L9´A, mutant made to probe the effects that the number of 9´A mutations has on the effects of menthol; ACh Binding Site, the putative ACh binding site; Intra-subunit, site between subunits in the transmembrane domain of α4β2; Near Cys Loop, site that is near the Cys loop of α4β2; Channel Pore, site that is in the channel pore of α4β2; Interfacial, a site on the transmembrane domain of a single subunit that faces toward the other transmembrane domain helices on the same subunit.

Movies

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Movie 1.

    We show six still frames from the movie of a menthol molecule during a flooding simulation. A, Menthol (shown in green sticks) is introduced in the extracellular solution. Menthol first encounters the extracellular domain (ECD) of the human α4β2 nicotinic receptor. B, Menthol binds to different residues on the ECD. C, Menthol reaches the “top” of the M2 region. D–F, For the rest of the flooding simulation, menthol remains in the transmembrane domain, between the “top” of the M2 region and the ring of 9´ Leu residues (shown as red sticks). Menthol does not move toward the cytoplasmic end of M2.

  • Movie 2.

    We present a higher-resolution version of a still frame from the movie, showing a menthol molecule sitting in the center of the ring of 9´ leucine residues. The carbons of menthol are shown in green, its hydrogens in white, and its oxygen in red. The carbons of the 9´ leucine residues are shown in gray, their oxygens in red, and their nitrogens in blue. The hydrogens of the leucine residue are not shown in the figure.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Movies
  • Figure 5-1.

    p-values for (+)-menthol and (−)-menthol comparison between α4[L9‵X]β2[wt] mutants. Download Figure 5-1, DOCX file

  • Figure 7-1.

    R2 Values for correlation of IC40 for (−)-menthol vs. amino acid indices. Download Figure 7-1, DOCX file

  • Figure 7-2.

    R2 Values for correlation of IC30 for (+)-menthol vs. amino acid indices. Download Figure 7-2, DOCX file

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 6
November/December 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Menthol Stereoisomers Exhibit Different Effects on α4β2 nAChR Upregulation and Dopamine Neuron Spontaneous Firing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Menthol Stereoisomers Exhibit Different Effects on α4β2 nAChR Upregulation and Dopamine Neuron Spontaneous Firing
Brandon J. Henderson, Stephen Grant, Betty K. Wong, Rezvan Shahoei, Stephanie M. Huard, Shyam S. M. Saladi, Emad Tajkhorshid, Dennis A. Dougherty, Henry A. Lester
eNeuro 21 December 2018, 5 (6) ENEURO.0465-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0465-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Menthol Stereoisomers Exhibit Different Effects on α4β2 nAChR Upregulation and Dopamine Neuron Spontaneous Firing
Brandon J. Henderson, Stephen Grant, Betty K. Wong, Rezvan Shahoei, Stephanie M. Huard, Shyam S. M. Saladi, Emad Tajkhorshid, Dennis A. Dougherty, Henry A. Lester
eNeuro 21 December 2018, 5 (6) ENEURO.0465-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0465-18.2018
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cigarettes
  • electronic nicotine delivery systems
  • nicotine
  • nicotine addiction
  • Xenopus oocyte

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Heterozygous Dab1 null mutation disrupts neocortical and hippocampal development
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Impaired AMPARs translocation into dendritic spines with motor skill learning in the Fragile X mouse model
  • Characterization of the Tau Interactome in Human Brain Reveals Isoform-Dependent Interaction with 14-3-3 Family Proteins
  • Glycolytic System in Axons Supplement Decreased ATP Levels after Axotomy of the Peripheral Nerve
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.