Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

A Gate-and-Switch Model for Head Orientation Behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans

Marie-Hélène Ouellette, Melanie J. Desrochers, Ioana Gheta, Ryan Ramos and Michael Hendricks
eNeuro 20 November 2018, 5 (6) ENEURO.0121-18.2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0121-18.2018
Marie-Hélène Ouellette
1Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marie-Hélène Ouellette
Melanie J. Desrochers
1Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ioana Gheta
1Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Ramos
1Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryan Ramos
Michael Hendricks
1Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Hendricks
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    RIA overview and requirement for control of head orientation. A, RIA is a unipolar interneuron whose axon extends into the ventral nerve cord and throughout the nerve ring. There are two RIAs, left and right, one is shown. B, Two axonal compartments within the nerve ring, nrV and nrD, encode head movements via local calcium signals (mCa2+) triggered by muscarinic input from SMD head motor neurons. C, Sensory pathways synapse on the loop domain of the RIA axon in the ventral nerve cord. Attractive stimuli lead to whole-axon reduction in calcium, while attractant removal causes whole axon calcium increases (sCa2+). D, Model for RIA function in steering behaviors. Where stimuli are symmetric across head bends, inhibitory output from RIA to motor neurons is symmetric. E, If the stimulus changes across head sweeps, RIA output to motor neurons become asymmetric, driving steering behavior. F, Schematic of head orientation measurement in response to a unilaterally presented stimulus. G, Estimation plot of difference between wild-type preference for odor as measured by percentage of the assay time (120 s) with their head within the odor stream and RIA::TeTx animals or animals treated with scopolamine. ANOVA F(2,50) = 5.7771, p = 0.0055, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 post hoc Student’s t test, n = 13, n = 20, n = 20. V, ventral; D, Dorsal. Open circles and lines are mean ± SD (top). Closed circles and lines are mean difference from control ± 95% confidence interval, shown with distribution of estimated means (see Materials and Methods).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Responses to odor removal depend on posture. A, Schematic of position-velocity plots to illustrate oscillatory head movements. B, Position-velocity trajectories from odor removal (circles) to 2 s after (arrowheads). C, Head displacement in the 2 s immediately following odor removal, with the start position normalized to head orientation at the odor switch. D, Relationship between head position at odor removal and the change in head position 2 s later. Linear regression F(1,124) = 132.3145, p < 0.0001; n = 126.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    RIA mediates directional head withdrawal. A, To analyze head withdrawal behaviors, which are mirror-symmetric across the dorsoventral axis, head deflection in either the dorsal (D) or ventral (V) direction is defined as positive. Positive velocities correspond to bending away from the body axis and negative velocities indicate head withdrawal. B, Mean plots of peristimulus head orientation at odor off, odor on, or in constant odor (no switch), binned according to whether the head is unbent (top) or bent in either direction (bottom) at the time of stimulus change (t = 0). Dashed “pre” and “post” boxes indicate time windows used for quantitation in D. C, Comparison of head velocity in response to stimulus changes (or no switch) when the head is bent or unbent. Arrow indicates characteristic head withdrawal in response to odor removal when the head is bent. D, Paired mean pre- and post-switch head velocities (upper panels, open circles and lines are mean ± SD) and estimations of the size of the head velocity change (lower panel, closed circles and lines are mean difference ± 95% confidence interval, along with probability distribution of means, see Materials and Methods). Odor switch (on, off, or constant odor) has no effect on head movements when the head is not bent (left panel, repeated measures ANOVA F(2,263) = 0.9386, p = 0.3925, n = 100, n = 82, n = 84). Sharp decreases in velocity are seen when odor removal occurs when the head is bent, but not for odor presentation or constant odor (middle panel, repeated measures ANOVA, F(2,109) = 7.7932, p = 0.0007, n = 26, n = 44, n = 42). In gar-3 mutants and animals expressing tetanus toxin in RIA these sharp decreases in head velocity are absent (right panel, repeated measures ANOVA F(3,85) = 4.4105, p = 0.0062, n = 42, n = 12, n = 18, n = 17); ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 post hoc Student’s t test between odor conditions (on, off, no switch) for wild-type animals; ##p < 0.01, #p < 0.05 post hoc Student’s t test between genetic manipulation (wild type, gar-3, gar-3 rescue, RIA::TeTx) for odor off responses during head bending.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Head orientation gates sensory responses. A, Head position-velocity trajectories color-coded by ∂nr (= nrV – nrD), a measure of normalized mCa2+ asymmetry in nrV and nrD. B, Head position-velocity trajectories color-coded by loop calcium signal, n = 126, 40 s each. C, Spontaneous head movements (left) and sCa2+ signals in the loop region of the RIA axon (right). Rows are matched and sorted according to head orientation at odor off (t = 10 s). A linear regression of loop response magnitudes and head deflection in either direction was significant (F(1,124) = 29.98, p < 0.0001, n = 126). D, Mean traces of loop calcium responses 5 s before and after odor removal binned by head orientation at the odor off time point. Shading is SEM. Left to right, n = 14, n = 6, n = 18, n = 22, n = 23, n = 21, n = 13, n = 9. E, Comparison of the magnitude of loop calcium responses to odor removal when the head is bent (head orientation > 0.5 or < –0.5) or unbent (head orientation between –0.5 and 0.5). Pre- and post-measurements are mean loop Ca2+ levels in 1s windows just before odor OFF and centered on the peak of the mean response, respectively, shown as paired responses (lines) and mean ± SD (open circles and lines). Estimations of the mean changes are shown below as mean difference ± 95% confidence interval (closed circles and lines) along with probability distributions of the means (see Materials and Methods). In both wild-type (n = 84, n = 42) and gar-3 (n = 20, n = 12) animals, the loop response magnitude is larger when the head is bent (repeated measures ANOVA F(1,154) = 41.4529, p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001 post hoc Student’s t test). gar-3 mutants have larger responses under both head orientation conditions, but there is no significant interaction between loop Ca2+ responses, head position at odor off, and genotype (repeated measures ANOVA F(1,154) = 0.2145, p = 0.6439).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Temporal features of sensory responses in RIA axonal compartments. A, Mean nrV, nrD, and loop responses on odor removal. Shading is SEM, dashed lines indicate position of nrV and nrD mean peaks. B, Head orientation predicts the mean lag between nrV and nrD peaks post-odor removal. ANOVA F(1,124) = 13.47, p = 0.0004. C, Cross-correlation of nrV, nrD, and mCa2+ asymmetry (∂nr) and head orientation, showing mCa2+ lag with head movements. gar-3 mutants lack mCa2+ and do not show head correlations. Re-expression of gar-3 cDNA in RIA partially rescues this relationship. D, nrV and nrD cross-correlations with head velocity for wild-type, gar-3, and RIA-specific gar-3 rescue in a 6-s time window comprising 2-s pre-odor removal and 4-s post-odor removal in relation to head orientation at odor off. When the head was bent, we observed no lag between head withdrawal and peak calcium responses in the nerve ring compartment ipsilateral to the direction of bending. gar-3 mutants show no distinction between nerve ring compartments. Expression of gar-3 cDNA in RIA in gar-3 mutants does not rescue the temporal features of sensory responses in the nerve ring. Analysis groups are the same as Figure 4.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Gate and switch model for RIA function in head orientation behaviors. A, RIA circuit diagram, with major upstream sensory pathways and head motor connections. Gating of sensory inputs to the loop domain and the nerve ring connections that constitute the dorsal-ventral switch. B, Ethological model in which head movements simultaneously produce proprioception-gated reafference and efference copies that converge on RIA. RIA output to motor neurons biases the undulatory gait dorsally or ventrally when reafferent stimuli are asymmetric across head sweeps.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 6
November/December 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Gate-and-Switch Model for Head Orientation Behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Gate-and-Switch Model for Head Orientation Behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans
Marie-Hélène Ouellette, Melanie J. Desrochers, Ioana Gheta, Ryan Ramos, Michael Hendricks
eNeuro 20 November 2018, 5 (6) ENEURO.0121-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0121-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
A Gate-and-Switch Model for Head Orientation Behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans
Marie-Hélène Ouellette, Melanie J. Desrochers, Ioana Gheta, Ryan Ramos, Michael Hendricks
eNeuro 20 November 2018, 5 (6) ENEURO.0121-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0121-18.2018
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • behavior
  • C. elegans
  • calcium signaling
  • sensorimotor integration

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Heterozygous Dab1 null mutation disrupts neocortical and hippocampal development
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Taste-odor association learning alters the dynamics of intra-oral odor responses in the posterior piriform cortex of awake rats
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.