Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Gas Anesthesia Impairs Peripheral Auditory Sensitivity in Barn Owls (Tyto alba)

Nadine Thiele and Christine Köppl
eNeuro 2 November 2018, 5 (5) ENEURO.0140-18.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0140-18.2018
Nadine Thiele
1Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Köppl
1Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
2Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4all” and Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christine Köppl
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Example of a typical ABR recording from an adult owl. Shown is an average response to 300 stimuli at 2 kHz, 51 dB SPL. Only wave I was analyzed. Amplitude was defined as the difference between the first positive (AmpMax) and following negative (AmpMin) peak. Latency was defined as the latency of the first positive peak (Tmax).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Auditory nerve single-unit thresholds were severely elevated under isoflurane. A, Box plot showing thresholds (normalized to the age-matched CAP) for auditory nerve fibers recorded under ketamine/xylazine and isoflurane, respectively. B, The same data, separated into 1.5-kHz-wide CF bands, for the two anesthetic conditions. Empty boxes represent data for the ketamine-terminal conditions, and hatched boxes represent data for the isoflurane-terminal condition. Note that thresholds under isoflurane were significantly higher. Boxes and whiskers indicate the interquartile ranges and 1.5 times the interquartile ranges, respectively. Horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians, and circular symbols indicate outliers that lie beyond 1.5 times the interquartile range.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    CAP thresholds were severely elevated under isoflurane. CAP threshold audiogram of an individual aged P32, under isoflurane anesthesia (solid line). For comparison, the average CAP audiogram for P32 owls under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia is also shown (dashed line; after Köppl and Nickel, 2007).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Auditory nerve spontaneous discharge rates were mildly depressed by isoflurane. A, Box plot showing overall spontaneous discharge rates for auditory nerve fibers recorded under ketamine/xylazine and isoflurane, respectively. The rates under isoflurane were significantly lower. B, The same data, separated into 1.5-kHz-wide CF bands, for the two anesthetic conditions. Empty boxes represent data for the ketamine-terminal conditions, and hatched boxes represent data for the isoflurane-terminal condition. Boxes and whiskers indicate the interquartile ranges and 1.5 times the interquartile ranges, respectively. Horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians, and circular symbols and stars indicate outliers that lie beyond 1.5 times (circles) or beyond 3 times (stars) the interquartile range.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    ABR thresholds were elevated under gas anesthesia. A, Box plot showing ABR thresholds as a function of frequency, for the same four adult individuals, tested with different anesthetic protocols in successive experiments. B, The same data, with thresholds now normalized to the values at the respective frequency for the ketamine-ABR condition; as a visual reference, the dashed line indicates the reference condition. Note that the minor variation across frequencies was not significant (Table 1, References 27 and 28). Therefore, C then shows an overall comparison between anesthetic conditions. Thresholds for either the isoflurane-ABR or sevoflurane-ABR condition were significantly higher than thresholds for the ketamine-ABR condition (Table 1, References 24 and 25). Thresholds for the ketamine-ABR condition are shown as empty boxes, for the isoflurane-ABR condition as hatched boxes, and for the sevoflurane-ABR condition as gray boxes. Boxes and whiskers indicate the interquartile ranges and 1.5 times the interquartile ranges, respectively. Horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians. There were no outliers beyond 1.5 times the interquartile ranges.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    A, Isoflurane dose dependence of ABR thresholds. Box plot showing thresholds for different isoflurane concentrations tested sequentially in ABR-terminal experiments. Thresholds under 2% isoflurane were significantly elevated relative to those under both 1% conditions (Table 1, References 32–35). B, Gradual threshold deterioration with time in terminal ABR experiments. Shown are ABR thresholds normalized to the values for the initial ketamine/xylazine condition (animal breathing air unaided), separated according to frequency, for all conditions tested sequentially. Note that the number of data points contributing to each box now varies; upward arrows indicate data that dropped out because the threshold exceeded the limit of the sound system and thus could not be determined. Note also that high frequencies appear to be affected more. Thresholds obtained under ketamine + artificial oxygen respiration are shown as empty boxes, for the 1% isoflurane condition as hatched blue boxes, for the 2% isoflurane condition as hatched yellow boxes, and for the repeated 1% isoflurane condition as hatched magenta boxes. Boxes and whiskers indicate the interquartile ranges and 1.5 times the interquartile ranges, respectively. Horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians. There were no outliers beyond 1.5 times the interquartile ranges.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    List of statistical tests

    Reference numberData structureParameter testedType of testp valueFigure
    1Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 57)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 351)
    Single-unit threshold (relative to age-matched CAP audiograms)Mann–Whitney<0.0012A
    2Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 5)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 49)
    Single-unit threshold (relative to age-matched CAP audiograms)
    CF <1.5 kHz
    Mann–Whitney0.0042B
    3Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 14)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 76)
    Single-unit threshold (relative to age-matched CAP audiograms)
    CF 1.5–3 kHz
    Mann–Whitney<0.0012B
    4Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 20)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 89)
    Single-unit threshold (relative to age-matched CAP audiograms)
    CF 3–4.5 kHz
    Mann–Whitney<0.0012B
    5Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 17)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 86)
    Single-unit threshold (relative to age-matched CAP audiograms)
    CF 4.5–6 kHz
    Mann–Whitney<0.0012B
    6Five independent samples (age groups):
    P11 to P14 (n = 99)
    P17 (n = 35)
    P21 to 32 (n = 87)
    P35 to P40 (n = 17)
    P51 to P86 (n = 38)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateKruskal–Wallis<0.001
    7Two independent samples:
    P11 to P14 (n = 99)
    P17 (n = 35)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected<0.001
    8Two independent samples:
    P11to P14 (n = 99)
    P21 to P32 (n = 87)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.001
    9Two independent samples:
    P11 to P14 (n = 99)
    P35 to P40 (n = 17)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.003
    10Two independent samples:
    P11 to P14 (n = 99)
    P51 to P86 (n = 38)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.002
    11Two independent samples:
    P17 (n = 35)
    P21 to P32 (n = 87)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.346
    12Two independent samples:
    P17 (n = 35)
    P35 to P40 (n = 17)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.992
    13Two independent samples:
    P17 (n = 35)
    P51 to P86 (n = 38)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.614
    14Two independent samples:
    P21 to 32 (n = 87)
    P35 to P40 (n = 17)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.467
    15Two independent samples:
    P21 to P32 (n = 87)
    P51 to P86 (n = 38)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.718
    16Two independent samples:
    P35 to P40 (n = 17)
    P51 to P86 (n = 38)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rateMann–Whitney Bonferroni corrected0.826
    17Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 56)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 260)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rate, all ages ≥P17Mann–Whitney0.0054A
    18Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 5)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 29)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rate, all ages ≥P17 and CF <1.5 kHzMann–Whitney0.5754B
    19Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 14)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 30)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rate, all ages ≥P17 and CF 1.5–3 kHzMann–Whitney0.0354B
    20Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 19)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 62)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rate, all ages ≥P17 and CF 3–4.5 kHzMann–Whitney0.8584B
    21Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 17)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 88)
    Single-unit spontaneous discharge rate, all ages ≥P17 and CF 4.5–6 kHzMann–Whitney0.2644B
    22Two independent samples:
    ketamine-terminal (n = 53)
    isoflurane-terminal (n = 327)
    Single-unit Q10 dBMann–Whitney0.098
    23Three dependent samples (n = 24):
    ketamine-ABR
    isoflurane-ABR
    sevoflurane-ABR
    ABR thresholdFriedman<0.0015
    24Two dependent samples (n = 24):
    ketamine-ABR
    isoflurane-ABR
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon
    Bonferroni corrected
    <0.001 5
    25Two dependent samples (n = 24):
    ketamine-ABR
    sevoflurane-ABR
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon
    Bonferroni corrected
    <0.001 5
    26Two dependent samples (n = 24):
    isoflurane-ABR
    sevoflurane-ABR
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon
    Bonferroni corrected
    0.076 5
    27Six independent samples:
    1/2/4/6/8/10 kHz
    (n = 4 each)
    ABR threshold difference: isoflurane-ABR−ketamine-ABR conditionKruskal–Wallis0.406 5B
    28Six independent samples:
    1/2/4/6/8/10 kHz
    (n = 4 each)
    ABR threshold difference: sevoflurane-ABR−ketamine-ABR conditionKruskal–Wallis0.472 5B
    29Three dependent samples (n = 16):
    ketamine-ABR
    isoflurane-ABR
    sevoflurane-ABR
    ABR amplitudes 10 dB above thresholdFriedman0.068
    30Three dependent samples (n = 16):
    ketamine-ABR
    isoflurane-ABR
    sevoflurane-ABR
    ABR latencies 10 dB above thresholdFriedman0.646
    31Two dependent samples (n = 24):
    ABR-terminal, ketamine
    ABR-terminal, ketamine + oxygen
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon0.163
    32Three dependent samples (n = 11):
    ABR-terminal, 1% isoflurane
    ABR-terminal, 2% isoflurane
    ABR-terminal, 1% isoflurane repeat
    ABR thresholdFriedman<0.001 6A
    33Two dependent samples (n = 11):
    ABR-terminal, 1% isoflurane
    ABR-terminal, 2% isoflurane
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon
    Bonferroni corrected
    0.003 6A
    34Two dependent samples (n = 11):
    ABR-terminal, 2% isoflurane
    ABR-terminal, 1% isoflurane repeat
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon
    Bonferroni corrected
    0.003 6A
    35Two dependent samples (n = 11):
    ABR-terminal, 1% isoflurane
    ABR-terminal, 1% isoflurane repeat
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon
    Bonferroni corrected
    0.262 6A
    36Two dependent samples (n = 24):
    ABR-terminal, ketamine + oxygen
    ABR-terminal, 1% isoflurane
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon0.004
    37Two dependent samples (n = 24):
    isoflurane-ABR (normalized compared with ketamine)
    ABR-terminal, 1% isoflurane (normalized compared with ketamine)
    ABR thresholdWilcoxon<0.001
    • Column 1 shows the serial number used to refer to specific tests throughout the article. Column 2 defines the samples, and column 3 the tested parameter. Column 4 lists the specific nonparametric test used, and column 5 shows the resulting p value, which is highlighted in bold type if the null hypothesis was rejected. Note that the criterion p value was 0.01, or lower if a Bonferroni correction was applied, as indicated in Column 4. Finally, column 6 refers to the relevant figure, if applicable.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 5
September/October 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gas Anesthesia Impairs Peripheral Auditory Sensitivity in Barn Owls (Tyto alba)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Gas Anesthesia Impairs Peripheral Auditory Sensitivity in Barn Owls (Tyto alba)
Nadine Thiele, Christine Köppl
eNeuro 2 November 2018, 5 (5) ENEURO.0140-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0140-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Gas Anesthesia Impairs Peripheral Auditory Sensitivity in Barn Owls (Tyto alba)
Nadine Thiele, Christine Köppl
eNeuro 2 November 2018, 5 (5) ENEURO.0140-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0140-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • auditory brainstem response
  • avian
  • bird
  • isoflurane
  • ketamine
  • physiology

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Different but complementary motor functions reveal an asymmetric recalibration of upper limb bimanual coordination
  • Serotonergic Suppression of Sustained Synaptic Responses in Rat Oculomotor Neural Integrator Networks
  • Spatially Extensive LFP Correlations Identify Slow-Wave Sleep in Marmoset Sensorimotor Cortex
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.