Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Cognition and Behavior

AhR Deletion Promotes Aberrant Morphogenesis and Synaptic Activity of Adult-Generated Granule Neurons and Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Memory

Juan de la Parra, María I. Cuartero, Alberto Pérez-Ruiz, Alicia García-Culebras, Ricardo Martín, José Sánchez-Prieto, Juan M. García-Segura, Ignacio Lizasoain and María A. Moro
eNeuro 30 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0370-17.2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0370-17.2018
Juan de la Parra
1Unidad De Investigación Neurovascular, Dpto. Farmacología y Toxicología, Facultad De Medicina, and Instituto Universitario De Investigación En Neuroquímica (IUIN), Universidad Complutense De Madrid (UCM); Instituto De Investigación Hospital 12 De Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Juan de la Parra
María I. Cuartero
1Unidad De Investigación Neurovascular, Dpto. Farmacología y Toxicología, Facultad De Medicina, and Instituto Universitario De Investigación En Neuroquímica (IUIN), Universidad Complutense De Madrid (UCM); Instituto De Investigación Hospital 12 De Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Pérez-Ruiz
1Unidad De Investigación Neurovascular, Dpto. Farmacología y Toxicología, Facultad De Medicina, and Instituto Universitario De Investigación En Neuroquímica (IUIN), Universidad Complutense De Madrid (UCM); Instituto De Investigación Hospital 12 De Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alicia García-Culebras
1Unidad De Investigación Neurovascular, Dpto. Farmacología y Toxicología, Facultad De Medicina, and Instituto Universitario De Investigación En Neuroquímica (IUIN), Universidad Complutense De Madrid (UCM); Instituto De Investigación Hospital 12 De Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo Martín
2Departamento De Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad De Veterinaria and IUIN, UCM, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ricardo Martín
José Sánchez-Prieto
2Departamento De Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad De Veterinaria and IUIN, UCM, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan M. García-Segura
3Departamento De Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad De Ciencias Químicas, and IUIN, UCM, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Juan M. García-Segura
Ignacio Lizasoain
1Unidad De Investigación Neurovascular, Dpto. Farmacología y Toxicología, Facultad De Medicina, and Instituto Universitario De Investigación En Neuroquímica (IUIN), Universidad Complutense De Madrid (UCM); Instituto De Investigación Hospital 12 De Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ignacio Lizasoain
María A. Moro
1Unidad De Investigación Neurovascular, Dpto. Farmacología y Toxicología, Facultad De Medicina, and Instituto Universitario De Investigación En Neuroquímica (IUIN), Universidad Complutense De Madrid (UCM); Instituto De Investigación Hospital 12 De Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for María A. Moro
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Ablation of AhR impairs hippocampus-dependent memory. A, Percentage of freezing in the CFC task for AhR+/+ and AhR –/– mice 1 h (left) and 24 h (right) after the foot shocks (*, p < 0.05 versus AhR+/+; n = 8 AhR+/+ and 7 AhR –/– animals/group). B, Percentage of exploration time between familiar and new object in the NOR test for AhR+/+ and AhR –/– mice 6 h after training. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction between the object and genotype [F(1, 18) = 7,46; p < 0.05; *, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 6 AhR+/+ and 5 AhR –/– animals/group]. C, Percentage of exploration time between old and new object location in the NOL test for AhR+/+ and AhR –/– mice 6 h after training. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction between the object and genotype [F(1, 42) = 7.93; p < 0.05; *, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 12 AhR+/+ and 11 AhR –/– animals/group]. D, Percentage of time spent in each arm in the Y-maze test for AhR+/+ and AhR –/– mice 6 h after training. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction between the arm/genotype [F(2, 27) = 3.84; p < 0.05; n = 6 animals/group]. E, Time spent to find the escape box during the Barnes maze training sessions in both AhR+/+ and AhR–/– mice. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect during training sessions [F(5, 65) = 5.04; p < 0.05; n = 7–8 animals/group]. F, Density plots for grouped data showing where the AhR+/+ and AhR –/– mice concentrated their searches during retention test day. G, Percentage of time (s) spent around each hole in the Barnes maze platform for AhR+/+ and AhR –/– mice during the retention test day. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction between the holes and genotype [F(19, 260) = 1.83; p < 0.05; *, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 7–8 animals/group). Data are mean ± SEM. Data were compared by using nonparametric 2-tailed Mann–Whitney test (A), or a nonparametric 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing (B–G).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The absence of AhR exacerbates adult hippocampal neurogenesis. A, BrdU+ cells in the DG of AhR+/+ and AhR–/– mice measured at p30, p60, and p100 24 h after the last BrdU injection. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction between the age and genotype [F(2, 24) = 9.51; p < 0.05; *, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 5 animals/group]. B, C, Ki67+ cells in the DG of AhR+/+ and AhR–/– mice measured at p30, p60, and p100. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction between the age and genotype [F(2, 28) = 8.56; p < 0.05; *, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 5–6 animals/group]. Representative images of Ki67+ cells in AhR+/+ and AhR–/– mice at different time points are shown in C. D–F, Quantification of the number of nestin/BrdU+ cells by flow cytometry 24 h after BrdU administration. Data are expressed as the percentage of control group (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 6 animals/group; D). Representative dot plots of double-stained cells for nestin and BrdU in the DG of AhR+/+ (E) and AhR–/– (F) mice. G–L, Characterization of type-1 (nestin+/GFAP+; G) and type-2 progenitors (nestin+/GFAP-; I) and their proliferative capacity (BrdU+; H and J) in the DG of AhR+/+ and AhR–/– mice determined at p30 and p100. Representative images of nestin (red), GFAP (green), BrdU (gray) of DG of AhR+/+ and AhR–/– mice at p30 (K) and p100 (L; *, p < 0.05 vs. AhR +/+; #, p < 0.05 vs. AhR–/–; n = 4–6 animals/group). M, N, Quantification of the number of DCX+ cells in the DG of WT and AhR–/– mice (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 7–8 animals/group). Representative images of DCX+ cells in AhR+/+ and AhR –/– mice are shown in N. O, P, Quantification of the number of BrdU+ cells (left) and newborn integrated neurons (BrdU+/Calbindin+; right) determined 28 days after BrdU administration (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 7–9 animals/group). Representative colocalization images for BrdU and calbindin in AhR+/+and AhR–/– mice are shown in P. Insets display high-magnification images. Numbers of cells are expressed per 1000 μm2. Data are mean ± SEM. Scale bar is 50 μm in C, J, K, and L; 70 μm in N; and 30 μm in P. Data were compared by using nonparametric 2-tailed Mann–Whitney test in D, M, and O or nonparametric 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing (A, B, G–J).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The absence of AhR alters granule cell morphology and dendritic spine density and maturation. A, Sholl analysis of granule dendritic branching of Golgi-Cox stained DG from AhR+/+ and AhR–/– p60 mice. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction between distance/genotype [F(24,125) = 2.45; p < 0.05; *, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 23 WT and 37 AhR KO neurons from 3–4 animals/group]. Representative reconstructions of Golgi-Cox stained neurons are shown for AhR+/+ (left) and AhR–/– mice (right). B, Total dendritic length of Golgi-Cox-stained granular cells (*p < 0.05 versus AhR). C, Quantification of spine density in Golgi–Cox stained neurons (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 20–30 dendrite segments from 3–4 animals/group). D, Densitometric analysis of dendrite DCX+ labeling distribution in the DG of WT and AhR–/– mice at p60. Data are displayed as the DCX+ integrated density found in total (GL+ML), GL, or ML normalized by values got from soma. E, Quantification of apical neuroblast length. Representative images of DCX+ labeling distribution in AhR+/+ and AhR–/– mice are shown in F (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 5–6 animals/group). G–N, GFP-retroviral infection of newborn neurons. Schematic protocol followed for CAG-GFP retrovirus infusion in AhR+/+ and AhR–/– p60 mice (G). Representative GFP newborn AhR+/+ (left) and AhR–/– neurons (right) are shown in H. Two-way ANOVA of Sholl analysis in GFP-labeled dentate granule cells demonstrates a significant interaction between the distance and genotype [F(4,30) = 3.02; p < 0.05; *, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+; n = 19 WT and 28 AhR KO neurons from 4 animals/group; I]. Quantification of total dendritic length (J) and apical dendritic length (K). Density of dendritic (L) and mushroom (M) spines in proximal and distal dendritic segments in the molecular layer of AhR+/+/GFP+ and AhR–/–/GFP+ granule cells 4 weeks postinfection (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+/GFP+; n = 26 and 22 segments from 4 animals/group). Representative images of GFP-labeled spines in both proximal and distal segments of AhR+/+/GFP+ and AhR–/–/GFP+ granule cells (N). Insets display high-magnification images. Data are mean ± SEM. Data were compared by using nonparametric Mann–Whitney tests in B–E and J–M or a nonparametric 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing (A and I). Scale bar is 70 μm in F and H, and 2 μm in N.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    AhR deletion alters the synaptic properties of dentate gyrus granule cells. A, Schematic representation of a hippocampal slice showing stimulating and recording electrode sites. B, C, The resting membrane potential (B) and the current−voltage relationship (C) were not significantly different between DG granule cells from AhR+/+ and AhR–/– mice (n = 4 animals/group). D, E, DG granule cell firing rate is significantly increased by AhR deletion (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+). Representative sample traces (D) and averaged values (E) in response to increasing depolarizing currents. F, G, AMPA/NMDA ratio is decreased by AhR deletion (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhR+/+). Representative traces (F) and averaged values (G) of NMDA- and AMPA-mediated EPSCs recorded at +40 and –60 mV, respectively. H, Averaged values showing a significant increase in the PPR at interstimulus intervals of 75, 100, 150, and 200 ms in cells lacking AhR (*, p < 0.05, and **, p < 0.01 vs. AhR+/+). EPSC sample traces represent the mean of 20 consecutive EPSCs at 0.33 Hz. Data are mean ± SEM (14 neurons from 8 slices from n = 4 AhR+/+ mice and 12 neurons from 8 slices from n = 4 AhR–/– mice). Data were compared by using nonparametric 2-tailed Mann–Whitney tests.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Acute ablation of AhR in adult neural precursors impairs hippocampus-dependent memory by promoting aberrant immature neurons. A, Schematic diagram of the strategy for conditional deletion of AhR in NPCs in nestin-CreERT2+/AhRf/f mice (AhR-icKO). AhRf/f and nestin-CreERT2+/AhRf/f mice were administered two rounds of tamoxifen (TAM; at p30 and p60) at a dose of 180 mg/kg. B, AhR immunostaining in AhRf/f (left) and AhR-icKO (right) 3 weeks after the second round of TAM injection. C, Quantification of the number of DCX+ cells per 1000 μm2 in the DG of AhRf/f and AhR-icKO mice 3 weeks after the last TAM injection (*, p < 0.05 versus AhRf/f; n = 8 animals/group; left). Representative images of DCX+ staining in AhRf/f and AhR-icKO mice (right). D, Densitometric analysis of dendrite DCX+ labeling distribution in the DG of AhRf/f and AhR-icKO mice 3 weeks after the last TAM injection. Data are displayed as the DCX+ integrated density found in total (GL+ML), GL, or ML normalized by values got from soma (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhRf/f; n = 6 AhRf/f and 5 AhR-icKO animals/group; left). Representative images of the arborization of immature newborn cells in AhRf/f and AhR-icKO mice (right). E, Protocol followed for a weak contextual fear conditioning paradigm (0.4 mA ×1) in AhRf/f and AhR-icKO treated with tamoxifen. Retrieval was performed 24 h after training. (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhRf/f; n = 10–11 animals/group). F, Percentage of time spent in each arm in the Y-maze test for AhRf/f and AhR-icKO mice 3 weeks after the last TAM injection 6 h after training. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant interaction between the arm and genotype [F(2, 57) = 5.91; p < 0.05; n = 10–11 animals/group). G, Percentage of exploration time between old and new object location in the NOL test for AhRf/f and AhR-icKO mice 3 weeks after the last TAM injection 6 h after training (n = 10–11 animals/group). Data are mean ± SEM. Scale bar is 50 μm in B–D. Data were compared by using nonparametric 2-tailed Mann–Whitney test (C–E), or nonparametric 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing (F, G).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Acute ablation of AhR in adult neural precursors alters the synaptic properties of dentate gyrus granule cells. A, Experimental protocol for tamoxifen administration and electrophysiological recordings. B, C, The resting membrane potential (B) and the current−voltage relationship (C) did not show significant differences between DG granule cells from AhRf/f and AhR-icKO mice (n = 4–6 animals/group). D, E, DG granule cell firing rate is significantly increased by specific AhR ablation (*, p < 0.05 vs. AhRf/f). Representative sample traces (D) and averaged values (E) in response to increasing depolarizing currents. F, G, AMPA/NMDA ratio is decreased by AhR deletion. Representative traces (F) and averaged values (G) of NMDA- and AMPA-mediated EPSCs recorded at +40 and –60 mV, respectively (*, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, and ***, p < 0.001 vs. AhRf/f). H, Averaged values showing a significant increase in the PPR at interstimulus 75, 100, 150, and 200-ms intervals in cells lacking AhR (*, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, and ***, p < 0.001 vs. AhRf/f). Data are mean ± SEM (25 neurons from 8 slices from n = 6 AhRf/f mice and 24 neurons from 8 slices from n = 4 AhR-icKO mice). Data were compared by using nonparametric 2-tailed Mann–Whitney tests.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 4
July/August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
AhR Deletion Promotes Aberrant Morphogenesis and Synaptic Activity of Adult-Generated Granule Neurons and Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Memory
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
AhR Deletion Promotes Aberrant Morphogenesis and Synaptic Activity of Adult-Generated Granule Neurons and Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Memory
Juan de la Parra, María I. Cuartero, Alberto Pérez-Ruiz, Alicia García-Culebras, Ricardo Martín, José Sánchez-Prieto, Juan M. García-Segura, Ignacio Lizasoain, María A. Moro
eNeuro 30 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0370-17.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0370-17.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
AhR Deletion Promotes Aberrant Morphogenesis and Synaptic Activity of Adult-Generated Granule Neurons and Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Memory
Juan de la Parra, María I. Cuartero, Alberto Pérez-Ruiz, Alicia García-Culebras, Ricardo Martín, José Sánchez-Prieto, Juan M. García-Segura, Ignacio Lizasoain, María A. Moro
eNeuro 30 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0370-17.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0370-17.2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
  • dendrite arborization
  • hippocampal memory
  • newborn granule cells

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Heterozygous Dab1 null mutation disrupts neocortical and hippocampal development
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Environment Enrichment Facilitates Long-Term Memory Consolidation Through Behavioral Tagging
  • Effects of cortical FoxP1 knockdowns on learned song preference in female zebra finches
  • The genetic architectures of functional and structural connectivity properties within cerebral resting-state networks
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.