Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Cognition and Behavior

Neural Pattern Classification Tracks Transfer-Appropriate Processing in Episodic Memory

Inês Bramão and Mikael Johansson
eNeuro 9 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0251-18.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0251-18.2018
Inês Bramão
1Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund SE-221 00, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Inês Bramão
Mikael Johansson
1Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund SE-221 00, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mikael Johansson
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, Trial structure during study. Notice that study phase was identical in the visual and the verbal memory tasks. The classifiers were trained and tested for decoding the picture category (face, landmark or object) based on the EEG TFRs (4–45 Hz) at different time bins when the picture was presented alone (outlined in green). B, Trial structure during retrieval for the visual and the verbal memory tasks. Replay of the encoding category-specific neural patterns was examined during the presentation of the word cue (outlined in green). C, Exemplars of the stimuli used in the paradigm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Averaged accuracy of the 20 cross-validated pattern classifiers trained to discriminate between faces, landmarks, and objects during the encoding phase of the visual and of the verbal memory task. The colored line represents the accuracy of the classifiers trained during the presentation of the target picture. The black line shows the baseline accuracy of the classifiers trained during word cue presentation. Highlighted (*) are the times bins for which classification performance survived multiple comparison correction. In gray is highlighted the time bins for which classification accuracy was highest.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Contribution of each channel to the performance accuracy of the 20 pattern classifiers during the encoding phase of the visual and the verbal memory task. The gray frame highlights the time bins for which classification accuracy was highest.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Relationship between the accuracy of the pattern classifier trained at 170 ms after picture onset during study and the proportion of exemplar hits in the visual and in the verbal memory task.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Pearson r values showing the temporal profile of the association between visual processing (tracked by EEG-based decoding) and memory performance in the visual and verbal memory task. Highlighted (•) are time bins for which the relationship with behavioral performance survived correction for multiple comparisons (for details, see Materials and Methods). A, The green line shows the association for retrieval success (i.e., exemplar hits) and the red line shows the association for retrieval failure (i.e., when participants fail to retrieve any information about the target picture). B, Association for retrieval success (green lines) separated for faces (solid green line), landmarks (dashed green line) and objects (dotted green line), and for retrieval failure (red lines) separated for faces (solid red line), landmarks (dashed red line), and objects (dotted red line).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A, Topography of the SME (5–7 Hz) observed between 120 and 320 ms for the visual and the verbal memory task. Electrodes that reached significance in the cluster-based permutation test are highlighted (*). B, TFRs from a representative channel for the visual (FC5) and verbal (F3) memory task.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    For the visual memory task, the classifiers trained between 120–320 ms after picture onset during study and tested around 450 ms after word cue onset at retrieval decode the stimuli category previously associated with the cue. For the verbal memory task, the classifiers trained between 350–450 ms after picture onset during study and tested around 700 ms after word cue onset at retrieval decode the stimuli category previously associated with the cue. A, Accuracy of the decoding at retrieval for both tasks. The black outlines show p = 0.05 significance thresholds generated by a permutation test. B, Results of comparing the accuracy of the replay against chance (33%). * Denotes critical t-value. C, Contribution of each channel for the accuracy of the significant replay of the early visual pattern classifiers at retrieval for the visual and verbal memory task.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Relationship between the replay of the early visual pattern classifier at retrieval and the proportion of exemplar hits in the visual and in the verbal memory task.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mean ± Standard Deviations for Exemplar and Category Hits, shown for each memory task and stimulus category.

    TotalFacesLandmarksObjects
    Exemplar hitsVisual74 ± 6%66 ± 9%79 ± 8%80 ± 7%
    Verbal53 ± 16%55 ± 16%46 ± 17%55 ± 20%
    Category hitsVisual69 ± 13%76 ± 13%70 ± 15%62 ± 16%
    Verbal62 ± 18%69 ± 17%60 ± 19%58 ± 19%
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 4
July/August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neural Pattern Classification Tracks Transfer-Appropriate Processing in Episodic Memory
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Neural Pattern Classification Tracks Transfer-Appropriate Processing in Episodic Memory
Inês Bramão, Mikael Johansson
eNeuro 9 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0251-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0251-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Neural Pattern Classification Tracks Transfer-Appropriate Processing in Episodic Memory
Inês Bramão, Mikael Johansson
eNeuro 9 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0251-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0251-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • EEG
  • episodic memory
  • multivariate pattern analysis
  • transfer-appropriate processing

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Visual Speech Reduces Cognitive Effort as Measured by EEG Theta Power and Pupil Dilation
  • A Progressive Ratio Task with Costly Resets Reveals Adaptive Effort-Delay Trade-Offs
  • Luminance Matching in Cognitive Pupillometry Is Not Enough: The Curious Case of Orientation
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.