Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Development

Myelination of Axons Corresponds with Faster Transmission Speed in the Prefrontal Cortex of Developing Male Rats

Sean McDougall, Wanette Vargas Riad, Andrea Silva-Gotay, Elizabeth R. Tavares, Divya Harpalani, Geng-Lin Li and Heather N. Richardson
eNeuro 31 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0203-18.2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0203-18.2018
Sean McDougall
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sean McDougall
Wanette Vargas Riad
2Neuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Silva-Gotay
2Neuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrea Silva-Gotay
Elizabeth R. Tavares
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Divya Harpalani
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geng-Lin Li
3Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Geng-Lin Li
Heather N. Richardson
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Heather N. Richardson
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Myelination of prefrontal circuits during adolescence is thought to lead to enhanced cognitive processing and improved behavioral control. However, while standard neuroimaging techniques commonly used in human and animal studies can measure large white matter bundles and residual conduction speed, they cannot directly measure myelination of individual axons or how fast electrical signals travel along these axons. Here we focused on a specific population of prefrontal axons to directly measure conduction velocity and myelin microstructure in developing male rats. An in vitro electrophysiological approach enabled us to isolate monosynaptic projections from the anterior branches of the corpus callosum (corpus callosum-forceps minor, CCFM) to the anterior cingulate subregion of the medial prefrontal cortex (Cg1) and to measure the speed and direction of action potentials propagating along these axons. We found that a large number of axons projecting from the CCFM to neurons in Layer V of Cg1 are ensheathed with myelin between pre-adolescence [postnatal day (PD)15] and mid-adolescence (PD43). This robust increase in axonal myelination is accompanied by a near doubling of transmission speed. As there was no age difference in the diameter of these axons, myelin is likely the driving force behind faster transmission of electrical signals in older animals. These developmental changes in axonal microstructure and physiology may extend to other axonal populations as well, and could underlie some of the improvements in cognitive processing between childhood and adolescence.

  • anterior cingulate
  • conduction velocity
  • forceps minor
  • g-ratio
  • myelin whole-cell patch clamp

Significance Statement

Neural processing improves during childhood and adolescent development, but the specific factors contributing to these developmental changes are largely unknown. The present study shows that between two and six weeks of age in male rats, axons in the prefrontal cortex undergo microstructural and electrophysiological changes that speed up neural transmission. These axonal changes could contribute to some of the developmental improvements in behavioral control and cognitive abilities dependent on the prefrontal cortex.

Introduction

Cognitive abilities and behavioral control improve significantly during childhood and adolescent development (Casey et al., 2000; Lenroot and Giedd, 2006). To understand how these functions improve, we must first identify the factors underlying enhanced neural processing in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of the maturing brain. This is a brain region that integrates information from multiple sources to process complex functions including affective perception of pain (Fuchs et al., 2014), modulation of stress responses (Law et al., 2009), behavioral control (Takenouchi et al., 1999), attention (Rushworth et al., 2003; Kaping et al., 2011), and working memory (Seamans et al., 1995). Physical changes to axonal pathways projecting into the mPFC could contribute to improved prefrontal functions in adulthood (Chugani et al., 1987; Paus et al., 1999; Sowell et al., 1999). Here, we sought to determine when and how prefrontal axons change in developing male rats.

Magnetic resonance imaging studies in humans have shown that white matter, which contains a large number of myelinated fiber tracts, increases in volume in the frontal cortex between childhood and adulthood (Bartzokis et al., 2001; Perrin et al., 2008). These macrostructural changes correspond with increased cognitive abilities (O’Muircheartaigh et al., 2014; Deoni et al., 2016). Myelination of axons during development may enhance neural processing because this lipid-rich coating provides insulation that facilitates the propagation of action potentials along the axons via saltatory conduction (Fuster, 2002; Giedd, 2004). Indeed, increases in indices of myelination like fractional anisotropy (FA) and myelin volume fraction during development have been associated with higher processing speed, as measured by apparent (“residual”) conduction speed and inspection times (Dubois et al., 2008; Chevalier et al., 2015).

It should be noted, however, that FA is a measurement sensitive to many tissue properties aside from myelination, including axonal orientation and density (Jones et al., 2013). Myelination of axons within this pathway could potentially lead to faster neurotransmission, but this is not known because electroencephalograms are only able to assess the amount of time it takes for a sensory stimulus to elicit a neural response. Thus, faster processing of the stimulus could be due either to increased conduction velocity along individual axons or to other factors changing in the multisynaptic pathway during development. Few studies have measured how fast electrical signals travel along individual axons to directly test how neurotransmission changes when axons are myelinated in the developing prefrontal cortex.

In addition to overall increases in transmission speed, myelination of axons during development could also improve synchronicity in the timing of signals coming into the prefrontal cortex from other brain regions. Isochronicity describes electrical signals arriving at the same time to a target, despite differences in the length of axonal projections to that target (Sugihara et al., 1993; Pelletier and Paré, 2002; Salami et al., 2003). Isochronicity has been observed in neural input coming from different thalamic regions to the somatosensory cortex and this is thought to be due to differential myelination of these two axonal populations (Salami et al., 2003; Kimura and Itami, 2009). Notably, myelin ensheathment is complex and can vary in length and thickness along the same axon depending on where it resides within the brain (Tomassy et al., 2014). It is therefore important to examine myelin microstructure along different portions of axons that reside in white versus gray matter regions of the brain.

The present study investigated how prefrontal axons change physically and functionally during development. To accomplish this goal, we focused on an axonal population that extends from the anterior branches of the corpus callosum (corpus callosum-forceps minor, CCFM) into the dorsal mPFC (anterior cingulate cortex, Cg1). The Cg1 is not fully developed by adolescence (Benes, 1989; Cunningham et al., 2002, 2008) and has been shown to be critical for attention (Koike et al., 2016), spatial memory (Wartman et al., 2014), and decision-making (Kennerley et al., 2006). We also found myelinated axons in this region are sensitive to alcohol (Vargas et al., 2014). Thus, the location of the Cg1 respective to the CCFM provides a unique experimental preparation to isolate, measure, and analyze different physical and electrophysiological properties of these axons in developing animals. We used a two-pronged approach to study these axons in pre-adolescent and adolescent male rats. Neurotransmission speed of individual axons was assessed by slice electrophysiology and myelin ensheathment was assessed using microstructural histology. This strategy enabled us to detect age-dependent changes in myelin and faster neural processing within individual axons that could contribute to improved neural processing in a brain region critically important for executive functions and behavioral control.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male Wistar rats were ordered from Charles River (pre-adolescent rats were shipped with nursing moms). Separate animals were used for the electrophysiological and myelin microstructure histological experiments. For the electrophysiological experiments, “pre-adolescent” animals were postnatal day (PD)8–PD15 and “adolescent” animals were PD40–PD58. In these experiments, 21 total cells were recorded from five pre-adolescent rats and 13 total cells were recorded from four adolescent rats. For the myelin microstructure histological experiments, brains were processed from four pre-adolescent (PD15) and four adolescent (PD43) animals. All animals were kept on a 12/12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 8 A.M.), with food and water available ad libitum. Weaning of pups does not occur until PD21; thus, all pre-adolescent animals were housed with nursing moms and three to four other pups, whereas adolescent animals were housed two to three per cage in this study. All procedures were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Experiment 1: in vitro slice electrophysiology

Preparation of brain tissue slices for electrophysiology

Following CO2 euthanasia, brains were rapidly removed and placed into ice-cold cutting solution, which contained 89.1 mM sucrose, 13.88 mM glucose, 87.27 mM NaCl, 2.48 mM KCl, 1.25 mM sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate, 25 mM sodium bicarbonate, 7 mM MgCl2·6H2O, and 0.37 mM CaCl2. Coronal slices were cut at 300-µm thickness with a vibratome (Leica VT1200 S with Vibrocheck). The slices were then incubated in artificial CSF (aCSF) at 33°C for 45 min. aCSF contained 127 mM NaCl, 25 mM sodium bicarbonate, 25 mM glucose, 2.5 mM KCl, and 1.25 mM sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate. The cutting solution and aCSF were bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 gas.

Stimulation and recordings for electrophysiology

Slices were transferred to a recording chamber and continuously perfused with aCSF. During recording, neurons were located using an Olympus BX51W1 microscope with 4× and 60× objectives. Cells in the Cg1 were then patched under the whole-cell voltage-clamp mode (the amplifier was HEKA EPC10/2 USB with Patch master for data acquisition). Micropipettes had a bath resistance between 3 and 11 MΩ (pipette puller Narishige PC-10), with an internal solution containing 130 mM KGlu, 10 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA, 3 mM MgATP, and 0.5 mM NaGTP combined with Alexa Fluor 594 fluorescent dye to visualize the patched cells (Fig. 1B). It is important to note that while Alexa Fluor 594 dye has been shown to alter AMPA receptor-mediated EPSCs at +40 mV, these effects were not evident at lower voltage (-60 mV, Maroteaux and Liu, 2016). It is therefore unlikely that this dye had a measurable effect on our results, as our cells were held at -80 mV (described below). A concentric bipolar stimulating electrode was used to excite fibers in the dorsal-medial region of the CCFM (Analog Stimulus Isolator Model 2200 from A-M Systems). For all animals, the boundary between the CCFM white matter and the beginning of the gray matter (Cg1) could easily be discerned under 60× magnification because fiber tracts were visible in CCFM, whereas no fiber tracts were visible in cortical tissue. The stimulation electrode was placed in the CCFM and it remained there through the duration of the experiment, whereas the recording electrode was moved from one cortical neuron to another within the Cg1. EPSCs were recorded in the patched cells within the cortical gray matter under voltage clamp at -80 mV. We held the cells at this voltage to increase EPSC amplitudes so that EPSCs with small amplitudes could be detected reliably. Initially, a stimulation ramp protocol was run to determine how the EPSC profile changed with increasing stimulation voltage, and then the cell was repeatedly stimulated with a constant intensity to establish a stable response.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Developmental increase in transmission speed along axons extending from the anterior corpus callosum (CCFM) to the cingulate cortex (Cg1). A, Schematic drawing of a coronal section illustrating placement of the stimulating electrode (blue) in the CCFM and recording electrode (red) in the Cg1. B, Histological verification of neurons recorded from the Cg1 (scale bar = 50 μm). C, Sample recording showing a series of 10 superimposed traces taken from a single cell using a constant amplitude threshold stimulation. Responses did not differ in the maximum amplitude of their current, but were still all-or-none, seen by the frequent instances when stimulation failed to evoke any responses from the cell. D, Schematic illustrating the minimum threshold stimulation design, which isolates axons sending monosynaptic connections to recorded cells in the cortex. In this image, axons in the CCFM are stimulated (black) and neurons in the cortex (red) are patch clamped. These CCFM axons synapse onto both the recorded cells (red) and onto non-recorded cells (gray). The gray cells illustrate intermediate cells that are postsynaptic to the CCFM axons, but presynaptic to the patch clamped red cells. The low intensity stimulation paradigm is not strong enough to evoke an action potential in these postsynaptic gray cells. Therefore, only the direct (monosynaptic) connections determine the EPSCs detected in the red recorded cells. E, Jitter was calculated to be above 0.2 ms in both pre-adolescent and adolescent groups; therefore, conduction was orthodromic, i.e., traveling down the axon toward the terminals. F, There was no correlation between latency and transmission distance detected in either age group (pre-adolescent: r = 0.24, p = 0.30; adolescent: r = 0.44, p = 0.14). G, There was a significant increase in the average conduction velocity between pre-adolescence and adolescence (t(24.68) = 6.47, *p < 0.001). Note: conduction velocity calculation includes synaptic delay. H, Velocity correlated with transmission distance in both age groups (pre-adolescent: r = 0.61, p = 0.004; adolescent: r = 0.69, p = 0.009). Electrophysiological data (obtained from 21 cells from five pre-adolescent rats and 13 cells from four adolescent rats) are expressed as mean ± SEM. Illustrations were created by modifying images purchased in the PPT Drawing Toolkits-BIOLOGY Bundle from Motifolio, Inc.

A low intensity stimulation paradigm (10–30 μA, 0.2 ms) was used to generate a minimal amplitude EPSC. This strategy was used for two reasons. First, in order for a cell to respond to such a low stimulation, the CCFM axon stimulated must have a monosynaptic connection to the cell. This assumes that if there were a cell intermediate to the stimulated axon and the recorded cell, the low intensity stimulation of the axon would generate an EPSC in this intermediate cell, but this would not be sufficient to elicit an action potential that would then stimulate an EPSC in the patched cell (illustrated in Fig. 1D). Second, the axon terminal must have multiple synapse sites on the postsynaptic cell to generate a detectable change in current, i.e., the sum of the EPSCs delivered must be detectable above noise. This strategy therefore isolated the single axon that has the strongest connection to the recorded cell. Threshold was determined by lowering the stimulation intensity to the minimum level at which EPSCs could still be evoked, accompanied by frequent failures. The EPSC onset was measured as the time point where the slope of the current changed from baseline following the EPSC artifact.

Electrophysiological measurements and analyses

Images of the patched cells were taken under 4× magnification to determine the distance between the stimulation site and recorded cell (transmission distance). Two different methods were used to determine the response latency. The first method used the time difference between the start of the stimulation artifact (Fig. 1C, arrow) and the detection of the post-artifact current change that fell below the baseline current of the cell. The second method determined the latency between the start of the artifact and the peak of the resulting EPSC. This method was only used to calculate the response latency jitter for each cell, as the EPSC peak does not necessarily reflect the most accurate measure of EPSC onset. Jitter is the variability in response latency observed throughout various stimulations. A response latency jitter value higher than 0.2 ms indicates that the response is synaptically driven, or orthodromic (Pelletier and Paré, 2002), as neurotransmission time can vary between trials. Jitter for each series of stimulations was calculated as the standard deviation of the response latencies using ≥10 individual traces.

Experiment 2: histology

Processing of brain tissue for analysis of myelin

Pre-adolescent (PD15) and adolescent (PD43) rats were perfused with 1% paraformaldehyde/1.25% glutaraldehyde in 0.12 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 with 0.2 mM CaCl2 added. After 4 d postfixation, a vibratome was used to cut 150-μm coronal slices containing the prefrontal cortex (3.20–1.85 mm from bregma; Paxinos and Watson, 1998). These slices were rinsed in 0.12 M phosphate buffer with 0.2 mM CaCl2 and 8% dextrose and postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide. Following en bloc staining with uranyl acetate, the slices were dehydrated and embedded in Polybed 812 between two sheets of Aclar film. The phospholipids and myelin sheaths were clearly visible as a dark brown color in the slices after the osmium postfixation (Fig. 2A). For each embedded slice, five digital images were obtained using a brightfield Leica microscope (2.5× objective) attached to a DP71 Olympus camera. These digital images were then combined together in a mosaic using MosaicJ from ImageJ (Thévenaz and Unser, 2007) to reconstruct the full prefrontal section for measurement of CCFM cross-sectional area. Next, a 0.8 × 1.2 mm region containing the dorsomedial CCFM and adjacent Cg1 was dissected from each embedded slice. Dissected tissue samples were mounted on epoxy blocks and 2.5-µm semi-thin coronal sections were collected using a Sorvall JB 4 microtome. Semi-thin sections were then mounted on subbed glass slides, stained with 0.1 M toluidine blue, dehydrated, and coverslipped for microscopic analysis (described below).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Developmental changes in macro- and microstructural measurements of myelin in the prefrontal cortex of male rats. A, Embedded coronal brain tissue slices of a pre-adolescent rat (PD15, left) and an adolescent rat (PD43, right; scale bar = 1 mm). The myelinated portion of the CCFM is outlined with a black dotted line in the pre-adolescent tissue slice and outlined with a red dotted line in the adolescent tissue slice to illustrate how myelinated cross-sectional area was analyzed. Small squares on the embedded slices indicate the location of the images shown in C, D. B, There was a significant increase in the myelinated cross-sectional area of CCFM in adolescent rats compared to pre-adolescent rats (t(3.95) = 5.65, *p = 0.005). C, D, Representative images of myelin development over adolescence in Cg1 and CCFM regions (scale bar = 20 μm). Neurons (black arrows), astrocytes (white arrows), and oligodendrocytes (orange arrows) were identified and distinguished using an algorithm created by García-Cabezas et al. (2016) that is based on cytological features. Examples of myelinated axons that crossed through the plane of section in the 1.5-μm semi-thin sections are labeled with small orange arrowheads. The number of myelinated axons and area-based g-ratio were determined from cross-sectioned axons such as these. Myelinated axons that were parallel to the plane of the semi-thin sections were not included in the analysis (not labeled in this figure). There was a significant developmental increase in the number of myelinated axons in Layer V of the Cg1 (C, t(3.00) = 14.17, *p = 0.0008) and CCFM (D, t(3.29) = 8.88, *p = 0.002). Data expressed as mean ± SEM. PrL, prelimbic cortex; IL, infralimbic cortex; aca, anterior commissure.

Microscopic analysis of embedded slices and semi-thin sections

The digital mosaics of the embedded slices were used for macrostructural analysis of prefrontal white matter. ImageJ software (Rasband, 1997) was used to trace the boundaries of the CCFM and measure the cross-sectional area. The semi-thin sections were used for all other myelin measures. Digital images were collected from Layer V of Cg1 within the mPFC at 2.7 mm anterior to bregma using a brightfield Leica microscope (100× oil objective) attached to a DP71 Olympus camera (Fig. 2C). We focused on Layer V because it is the main output layer of the mPFC (Goodfellow et al., 2009; van Aerde and Feldmeyer, 2015). Layer V was identified by its characteristic large pyramidal neurons with apical dendrites that extend through Layers II/III out to Layer I of the cortex (Kiernan and Hudson, 1991; Swenson, 2006; Wang et al., 2006; Fénelon et al., 2011; Vostrikov and Uranova, 2011). Images were also obtained from the dorsal medial edge of the CCFM (Fig. 2D).

The number of myelinated axons and the thickness of myelin sheaths relative to axonal size (g-ratio) were quantified (Figs. 2C,D and 3B ) using ImageJ software (Rasband, 1997) modified from Michailov et al. (2004). Axons were identified by matching morphologic characteristics, as described in previous studies (Peters et al., 2001; Chomiak and Hu, 2009; Liu et al., 2012). We quantified g-ratio in at least 100 randomly selected myelinated axons for each animal as an index of myelin thickness relative to fiber diameter. Only axons with their entire myelin sheaths visible were selected for measurements. Area-based g-ratio was used rather than standard diameter-based g-ratio because axons in the central nervous system are not perfectly circular in cross-sections (Almeida et al., 2011; Bakken and Stevens, 2012; Perge et al., 2012). The g-ratio was calculated by dividing the axon area by the area of the axon plus the myelin sheath combined (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

There were no developmental changes in axonal diameter or g-ratios of myelinated axons in the CCFM. A, Schematic showing a cross-section of a myelinated axon. G-ratios were calculated by obtaining a measurement of the inner axon area and the whole fiber area. B, Relative myelin thickness, as measured by g-ratio, did not change between pre-adolescence and adolescence (n = 4 per group, t(5.43) = 0.78, p = 0.47). C, A two sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test showed that axon diameter distribution does not change from pre-adolescence to adolescence (p = 0.1708). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Illustrations were created by modifying images purchased in the PPT Drawing Toolkits-BIOLOGY Bundle from Motifolio, Inc.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software package (R Core Team, 2014). Student’s t tests were used to assess the difference in conduction velocity, jitter, forceps minor area, and myelinated axon number between the two age groups. To analyze g-ratio, the average g-ratio was calculated for each region in each rat by analyzing 100 axons for Cg1 and 100 axons for CCFM in each animal. Groups were compared by Student’s t test using the average g-ratio of each rat. Pearson correlation analyses were used to test for relationships between latency and transmission distance, velocity and distance, and between g-ratio and axon diameter. A two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to compare axon diameter distributions between groups. Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05 using two-tailed tests.

Results

Conduction velocity increased from pre-adolescence to adolescence in CCFM axons that synapse onto cells in Layer V of the Cg1

We evaluated how age impacted the speed of neurotransmission in CCFM fibers with monosynaptic connections to cells in the Cg1. Conduction velocity (calculation includes synaptic delay) nearly doubled in these axons from pre-adolescence (PD8–PD15) to adolescence (PD40–PD58, 0.11 ± 0.01 vs 0.18 ± 0.01 m/s, respectively, t(24.68) = 6.47, p = 0.000001; Fig. 1G). Importantly, jitter was above 0.2 ms for all cells (range: 0.26–7.91), indicating that the stimulation was orthodromic and traveled down the axon to the terminals in Layer V of Cg1 (Fig. 1E).

There was a positive relationship between conduction velocity and transmission distance in both pre-adolescent and adolescent groups

To determine whether conduction velocity remains constant across axons or changes depending on how far away the postsynaptic cell is from the stimulation, we first analyzed the relationship between the time to EPSC onset (“response latency”) and the distance between the stimulation site and the recorded cell (“transmission distance”). These variables were not significantly correlated in either age group (pre-adolescents: r = 0.24, p = 0.30; adolescents: r = 0.44, p = 0.14; Fig. 1F). However, when we examined the relationship between conduction velocity and transmission distance, there was a significant, positive correlation in both pre-adolescents (r = 0.61, p = 0.004) and adolescents (r = 0.69, p = 0.0085). Thus, transmission speed was fastest in the axons that projected to cortical cells further away from the CCFM (Fig. 1H).

The number of myelinated axons increased from PD15 to PD43 in the Cg1 and CCFM

To address whether developmental increases in the speed of neurotransmission between the CCFM and Cg1 corresponds to increased myelination in these regions, we first assessed if there were age-dependent changes in the cross-sectional area of the CCFM (myelinated portion). The size of CCFM was more than three times larger in adolescent compared to pre-adolescent rats (0.70 ± 0.13 vs 2.39 ± 0.32 mm2, respectively, t(3.95) = 5.65, p = 0.005; Fig. 2A,B). The developmental increase in the size of the CCFM size may be due in part to a near 5-fold increase in the density of myelinated axons in this structure (28.64 × 103 ± 2.69 × 103 axons per mm2 in pre-adolescent animals vs 125.15 × 103 ± 12.26 × 103 axons per mm2 in adolescent animals, t(3.29) = 8.88, p = 0.002; Fig. 2D). The change in the number of myelinated axons was even more substantial in the Cg1, with a 90-fold increase in density from pre-adolescence to adolescence (0.33 × 103 ± 0.07 × 103 axons per mm2 vs 30.34 × 103 ± 2.44 × 103 axons per mm2, respectively, t(3.00) = 14.17, p = 0.0008; Fig. 2C).

No measurable changes in relative myelin thickness were detected in the CCFM between PD15 and PD43

We next measured the average g-ratio of myelinated axons in the CCFM of both age groups to determine if there were developmental increases in the relative thickness of myelin on these axons. G-ratios were not different between the two age groups, indicating that the relative thickness of myelin sheaths was not a factor contributing to the larger size of the CCFM in older animals (0.73 ± 0.01 vs 0.74 ± 0.02, respectively, t(5.43) = 0.78, p = 0.47; Fig. 3B). Based on the combined findings above (a developmental increase in the number of myelinated axons without an overall decrease in g-ratios), we assume that these CCFM axons are undergoing de novo myelination and the process from initiation of wrapping to completion of a myelin segment occurs quite rapidly.

The size (diameter) of myelinated axons in the CCFM did not change with development

To address whether developmental increases in the speed of neurotransmission corresponds to increased axon diameter, we measured average myelinated axon diameter and assessed the distribution of diameters in CCFM between PD15 and PD43. Average axon diameter did not change between the two age groups (0.89 ± 0.10 vs 0.89 ± 0.07 μm, respectively, t(750.01) = -0.02, p = 0.98). Two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test showed no significant changes between the distributions (p = 0.17). Thus, both the average diameter of axons and the range of axon diameters did not increase from pre-adolescence (range: 0.3–2.3 μm) to adolescence (range: 0.4–2.1 μm; Fig. 3C).

Discussion

The brain undergoes a series of maturational processes during childhood and adolescence that is thought to drive enhanced cognitive function in adulthood. To gain a better understanding of these developmental factors at the circuit level, we used histological and electrophysiological approaches to test for changes in axonal myelination and neurotransmission speed in the developing mPFC of male rats. Between two and six weeks of age, a large number of axons are being myelinated in this anterior region of the brain, and the addition of myelin segments along the axon appeared to move anterogradely from the corpus callosum out toward the axonal terminals in Layer V of the adjacent cortex (Fig. 4). These data complement previous studies investigating white matter changes in the developing brain of rodents (Kim and Juraska, 1997; Markham et al., 2007; Calabrese and Johnson, 2013; Downes and Mullins, 2014; Mengler et al., 2014; Willing and Juraska, 2015), and provide new evidence suggesting that increases in prefrontal white matter could be partially due to de novo myelination of axons rather than the thickening of myelin sheaths on previously-myelinated axons. Correspondent with myelination of prefrontal axons, was a significant increase in the speed at which electrical signals travel down these axons. By isolating monosynaptic projections, we gained insight into how electrical information travels from the anterior branches of the corpus callosum to the mPFC. The robust morphologic changes and improvements in transmission speed in individual prefrontal axons that were observed in the present study provide a means by which cognitive processing could improve between childhood and adolescence (Casey et al., 2000; Lenroot and Giedd, 2006).

Myelination of prefrontal axons appears to be a key factor underlying the developmental increases in neural processing. There was a significant increase in the number of myelinated axons in the CCFM and Cg1 and the change in the size of the CCFM in older animals is presumably due to de novo myelination of axons rather than thickening of myelin sheaths on previously-myelinated axons. Consistent with this interpretation, we did not find an age-dependent increase in the relative thickness of myelin (decrease in g-ratio). In older animals, electrical signals traveled twice as fast along axonal projections from the CCFM to neurons in Layer V of the Cg1. Two different mechanisms could account for increased transmission speed: (1) larger diameter of the axons or (2) myelination of the axons (Hursh, 1939; Waxman, 1980; Hartline and Colman, 2007). As there was no age difference in the mean diameter or range of diameters in myelinated axons we can rule out increased diameter as a mechanism for increased axonal speed. Instead, myelination appears to be responsible for the developmental increase in axonal signal transmission speed.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Theoretical model summarizing structural and functional changes in axons within the developing prefrontal cortex. Electrophysiological analyses revealed a significant developmental increase in neurotransmission speed in axons projecting from the CCFM to Layer V in the Cg1 (speed is illustrated by the number and color of arrowheads). This increase in conduction velocity is accompanied by a developmental increase in the number of myelinated fibers and no change in axonal diameter, suggesting that myelination is a key factor driving faster neuronal processing. A positive relationship between conduction velocity and transmission distance in all animals suggests longer axonal projections may have a mechanism to ensure synchronized timing of incoming signals to Cg1 neurons. This phenomenon is observed even in the young age group, which has almost no myelin in these regions. Thus, other physical parameters such as axonal diameter, which varied widely among this axonal population, could serve to synchronize the timing of incoming information to postsynaptic cells residing in different locations in the Cg1. Illustrations were created by modifying images purchased in the PPT Drawing Toolkits-BIOLOGY Bundle from Motifolio, Inc.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of increased conduction velocity in this specific fiber population (CCFM → Cg1), providing insight into one mechanism by which neural processing is enhanced during development. Perhaps similar increases in conduction velocity are occurring in axons within the posterior branches of the corpus callosum (splenium) and other regions that are being myelinated during this time (Kim and Juraska, 1997; Downes and Mullins, 2014; Mengler et al., 2014).

The data herein allow us to make inferences about how the myelination process takes place in the juvenile prefrontal cortex. Myelin ensheathment of prefrontal axons during this developmental period seems to move from the more lateral portion in white matter to the more medial portion in gray matter. In our sampled region, we observed that >28,000 axons/mm2 were myelinated in the CCFM of PD15 animals, but only 334 axons/mm2 were myelinated in the Cg1 at this age. By PD43, the number of myelinated axons increased dramatically in the Cg1, reaching over 30,000 axons/mm2. Based on our electrophysiological evidence in monosynaptic axonal projections and macroscopic visualization of these axonal projections in embedded slices, we assume the microstructural myelin parameters obtained from the CCFM versus the Cg1 serve as representative examples of white versus gray matter segments of same group of axons. Presumably, oligodendrocytes are adding myelin sheath segments along these prefrontal axons moving from the lateral portions in the white matter toward the medial portions residing in the gray matter, i.e., moving anterogradely down the axon toward the terminals. Research in zebrafish indicates that the process of myelination of axons occurs quickly (Czopka et al., 2013). Oligodendrocytes initiate and complete myelination of a single segment along an axon within just 5 hours (Czopka et al., 2013). The rapid myelination processes could also explain why we did not detect age differences in g-ratios despite the robust increase in de novo myelination during this time. Presumably, the short period of time between the initiation and completion of myelin ensheathment of an axonal segment prevented us from capturing axons at a point when the new myelin sheaths were still thin. One benefit of rapid myelination may be the ability of the axon to quickly reach its optimal g-ratio (∼0.77 for axons in the central nervous system; Chomiak and Hu, 2009).

Several studies have demonstrated that variations in either axonal diameter or in myelin ensheathment can generate variability in transmission speed. This variability serves to synchronize the arrival of the signals to the same destination despite differences in fiber length, i.e., isochronicity (Baker and Stryker, 1990; Sugihara et al., 1993; Salami et al., 2003; Lang and Rosenbluth, 2003). We found that conduction velocity was higher in the axons that had to travel further away from CCFM to reach their target cells in Layer V of the Cg1. This suggests a possibility of isochronicity of incoming neural signals to these postsynaptic cells. Moreover, this capability may already be in place by PD15 because the positive relationship between transmission distance and velocity was similar in both age groups. The fact that there was a negligible number of myelinated axons found in the Cg1 of younger animals argues against differential myelination as a mechanism underlying this relationship. Perhaps variation in axonal diameters plays a role, but this remains to be determined.

Developmental improvements in prefrontal function could be due to a number of factors, including the higher axonal transmission speed observed in the current study. There is also documented evidence for increased connectivity between prefrontal and limbic regions (Cunningham et al., 2002), changes in excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission (Jackson et al., 2001; Floresco and Tse, 2007; Grace et al., 2007), and pruning (Crews et al., 2007), all of which could lead to enhanced neural processing and communication. We noted a trend of an increase in jitter in the older group, which could signify other developmental changes. Higher jitter is often associated with multiple axonal inputs synapsing onto the same cell, especially if these inputs are polysynaptic. However, the stimulation paradigm used for these experiments isolated monosynaptic connections. Therefore, increased variability in neurotransmission time could be due to more monosynaptic connections projecting to the same cell in older animals or to other factors such as calcium availability, neurotransmitter release, opening of the channels, etc. Additional research would be required to distinguish between these different possibilities.

Several limitations of the present study should be considered. First, because we focused on male rats in this initial study, it is unknown whether females show similar developmental changes in prefrontal axons. Second, without a more extensive timeline, we were not able to determine if the increase in myelination of these prefrontal axons between PD15 and PD43 is gradual or sudden. A diffusion tensor imaging study in male rodents shows that FA sharply increases between PD12 and PD18 in the cingulum–an axonal bundle that is adjacent to the corpus callosum (Calabrese and Johnson, 2013). These imaging data suggest that there is a rapid increase in myelination or axonal alignment of cingulum axons. As the CCFM region sampled in our study may contain some of the anterior axons of the cingulum, it will be important in future studies to refine the timeline and determine how rapidly CCFM axons are being myelinated, and if this developmental trajectory differs with sex. Third, as with many developmental studies we must consider the confounding variables of studying these two age groups. Animals under PD21 such as the pre-adolescent animals in our study are usually housed in larger groups with nursing moms, whereas animals older than PD21 such as the adolescent animals in our study have already been separated from their mothers and were housed in pairs or triads. Moreover, the animals herein were shipped from the vendor, and were therefore exposed to this stressor during different developmental time points and with or without nursing moms. Housing conditions and stress hormones are known to impact myelin (Chari et al., 2006; Makinodan et al., 2012). Differential sensitivity to these experiences could have modulated some of the age-related differences in myelin measures, although it is unlikely to fully account for the 5- and 90-fold changes in myelinated axon number observed in the present study. Fourth, our electrophysiological design isolated only part of the axonal pathway projecting to the cells in Layer V. As such, the origin of these axons is unknown and we can only infer that isochronicity was evident before adolescence based on the relationship between transmission distance and speed in younger animals. Future studies using tract tracing techniques could help determine the origin of these axons and would allow for more direct investigation of isochronicity, similar to what has been observed in other brain regions (Baker and Stryker, 1990; Sugihara et al., 1993). Finally, we were not able to measure diameters of unmyelinated axons, as our experimental design only allowed us to visualize myelinated axons. It should be noted that the average and range of diameters of myelinated axons in the CCFM did not change with age despite a substantial increase in the number of myelinated axons, similar to what has been shown in the CC splenium (Kim and Juraska, 1997). It is therefore reasonable to assume that axonal diameters may be similar in unmyelinated and myelinated axons.

In conclusion, the data altogether provide insight into the microstructural changes that occur within prefrontal axons during adolescence and how these developmental changes may affect the speed of electrical signals coming into this brain region. The observed developmental increase in conduction velocity, coupled with a lack of significant change in axonal diameter across development, suggests myelination may be the key contributor to this change in axonal speed. These findings highlight the critical role myelin may be playing in brain maturation just before and during adolescence. Future studies in rodents could allow for direct comparison between the microstructural methods used in the current study with macrostructural imaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). This would help improve our interpretation of imaging data obtained in humans. This study also provides an important foundation for future studies investigating how toxic substances or environmental disruptions could interrupt normal development and lead to impaired function of these prefrontal circuits.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements: We thank Lynn Bengston, Callie Dacyczyn, and Sarah Brem for assistance with the histological experiments; Dr. Jesse McClure for advice on statistical analysis of the electrophysiological data; and Samuel Scott for assistance editing this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grants R01AA024774 and R21AA021013 (to H.N.R.), NIH/National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grants R00DC010198 and R01DC015475 (to G.-L.L.), and the NIH/Postbaccalaureate Research Education Program Grant R25GM086264 (to W.V.R.).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Almeida RG, Czopka T, Ffrench-Constant C, Lyons DA (2011) Individual axons regulate the myelinating potential of single oligodendrocytes in vivo. Development 138:4443–4450. doi:10.1242/dev.071001 pmid:21880787
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Baker GE, Stryker MP (1990) Retinofugal fibres change conduction velocity and diameter between the optic nerve and tract in ferrets. Nature 344:342–345. doi:10.1038/344342a0 pmid:2314474
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Bakken TE, Stevens CF (2012) Visual system scaling in teleost fish. J Comp Neur 520:142–153. doi:10.1002/cne.22704 pmid:21681750
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bartzokis G, Beckson M, Lu PH, Nuechterlein KH, Edwards N, Mintz J (2001) Age-related changes in frontal and temporal lobe volumes in men: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiat 58:461. pmid:11343525
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Benes FM (1989) Myelination of cortical-hippocampal relays during late adolescence. Schizophrenia Bull 15:585–593. pmid:2623440
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Calabrese E, Johnson GA (2013) Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance histology reveals microstructural changes in the developing rat brain. Neuroimage 79:329–339. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.101 pmid:23648962
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Casey BJ, Giedd JN, Thomas KM (2000) Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biol Psychol 54:241–257. pmid:11035225
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Chari DM, Zhao C, Kotter MR, Blakemore WF, Franklin RJM (2006) Corticosteroids delay remyelination of experimental demyelination in the rodent central nervous system. J Neurosci Res 83:594–605. doi:10.1002/jnr.20763
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Chevalier N, Kurth S, Doucette MR, Wiseheart M, Deoni SCL, Dean DC, O'Muircheartaigh J, Blackwell KA, Munakata Y, LeBourgeois MK (2015) Myelination is associated with processing speed in early childhood: preliminary insights. PLoS One 10:e0139897. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139897
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    Chomiak T, Hu B (2009) What is the optimal value of the g-ratio for myelinated fibers in the rat CNS? A theoretical approach. PLoS One 4:e7754. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007754
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Chugani HT, Phelps ME, Mazziotta JC (1987) Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development. Ann Neurol 22:487–497. doi:10.1002/ana.410220408 pmid:3501693
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Crews F, He J, Hodge C (2007) Adolescent cortical development: a critical period of vulnerability for addiction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:189–199. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.12.001 pmid:17222895
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Cunningham MG, Bhattacharyya S, Benes FM (2002) Amygdalo-cortical sprouting continues into early adulthood: implications for the development of normal and abnormal function during adolescence. J Comp Neur 453:116–130. doi:10.1002/cne.10376 pmid:12373778
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Cunningham MG, Bhattacharyya S, Benes FM (2008) Increasing interaction of amygdalar afferents with GABAergic interneurons between birth and adulthood. Cereb Cortex 18:1529–1535. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm183 pmid:17971342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Czopka T, Ffrench-Constant C, Lyons D (2013) Individual oligodendrocytes have only a few hours in which to generate new myelin sheaths in vivo. Dev Cell 25:599–609. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.013 pmid:23806617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Deoni SCL, O’Muircheartaigh J, Elison JT, Walker L, Doernberg E, Waskiewicz N, Dirks H, Piryatinsky I, Dean DC, Jumbe NL (2016) White matter maturation profiles through early childhood predict general cognitive ability. Brain Struct Funct 221:1189–1203. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0947-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    Downes N, Mullins P (2014) The development of myelin in the brain of the juvenile rat. Toxicol Pathol 42:913–922. doi:10.1177/0192623313503518 pmid:24129760
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Dubois J, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Soarès C, Cointepas Y, Le Bihan D, Hertz-Pannier L (2008) Microstructural correlates of infant functional development: example of the visual pathways. J Neurosci 28:1943–1948. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5145-07.2008 pmid:18287510
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Fénelon K, Mukai J, Xu B, Hsu P-K, Drew LJ, Karayiorgou M, Fischbach GD, Macdermott AB, Gogos JA (2011) Deficiency of Dgcr8, a gene disrupted by the 22q11.2 microdeletion, results in altered short-term plasticity in the prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4447–4452. doi:10.1073/pnas.1101219108 pmid:21368174
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Floresco SB, Tse MT (2007) Dopaminergic regulation of inhibitory and excitatory transmission in the basolateral amygdala-prefrontal cortical pathway. J Neurosci 27:2045–2057. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5474-06.2007 pmid:17314300
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Fuchs PN, Peng YB, Boyette-Davis JA (2014) The anterior cingulate cortex and pain processing. Front Integr Neurosci 8:35. doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00035
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Fuster JM (2002) Frontal lobe and cognitive development. J Neurocytol 31:373–385. pmid:12815254
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    García-Cabezas MA, John YJ, Barbas H, Zikopoulos B (2016) Distinction of neurons, glia and endothelial cells in the cerebral cortex: an algorithm based on cytological features. Front Neuroanat 10:107. doi:10.3389/fnana.2016.00107
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Giedd J (2004) Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Ann NY Acad Sci 1021:77–85. doi:10.1196/annals.1308.009 pmid:15251877
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Goodfellow NM, Benekareddy M, Vaidya VA, Lambe EK (2009) Layer II/III of the prefrontal cortex: inhibition by the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor in development and stress. J Neurosci 29:10094–10103. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1960-09.2009 pmid:19675243
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Grace AA, Floresco SB, Goto Y, Lodge DJ (2007) Regulation of firing of dopaminergic neurons and control of goal-directed behaviors. Trends Neurosci 30:220–227. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.003 pmid:17400299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Hartline DK, Colman DR (2007) Rapid conduction and the evolution of giant axons and myelinated fibers. Curr Biol 17:29–35. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.042
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    Hursh JB (1939) Conduction velocity and diameter of nerve fibers. Am J Physiol 127:131–139. doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1939.127.1.131
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    Jackson ME, Frost AS, Moghaddam B (2001) Stimulation of prefrontal cortex at physiologically relevant frequencies inhibits dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurochem 78:920–923. pmid:11520912
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Jones DK, Knösche TR, Turner R (2013) White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do’s and don’ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 73:239–254. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081 pmid:22846632
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Kaping D, Vinck M, Hutchison RM, Everling S (2011) Specific contributions of ventromedial, anterior cingulate, and lateral prefrontal cortex for attentional selection and stimulus valuation. PLoS Biol 9:1–17.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    Kennerley SW, Walton ME, Behrens TEJ, Buckley MJ, Rushworth MFS (2006) Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex. Nat Neurosci 9:940–947. doi:10.1038/nn1724 pmid:16783368
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Kiernan JA, Hudson AJ (1991) Changes in sizes of cortical and lower motor neurons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 114:843–853. doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.843
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Kim JHY, Juraska JM (1997) Sex difference in the development of axon number in the splenium of the rat corpus callosum from postnatal day 15 through 60. Dev Brain Res 102:77–85. pmid:9298236
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Kimura F, Itami C (2009) Myelination and isochronicity in neural networks. Front Neuroanat 3:(12):1–5. doi:10.3389/neuro.05.012.2009 pmid:19597561
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Koike H, Demars MP, Short JA, Nabel EM, Akbarian S, Baxter MG, Morishita H (2016) Chemogenetic Inactivation of dorsal anterior cingulate cortex neurons disrupts attentional behavior in mouse. Neuropsychopharmacology 41:1014–1023. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.229
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Lang EJ, Rosenbluth J (2003) Role of myelination in the development of a uniform olivocerebellar conduction time. J Neurophysiol 89:2259–2270. doi:10.1152/jn.00922.2002 pmid:12611949
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Law AJ, Pei Q, Feldon J, Pryce CR, Harrison PJ (2009) Gene expression in the anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala of adolescent marmoset monkeys following parental separations in infancy. Int J Neuropsychopharm 12:761–772. doi:10.1017/S1461145708009723
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Lenroot RK, Giedd JN (2006) Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:718–729. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.001 pmid:16887188
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Liu J, Dietz K, DeLoyht JM, Pedre X, Kelkar D, Kaur J, Vialou V, Lobo MK, Dietz DM, Nestler EJ, Dupree J, Casaccia P (2012) Impaired adult myelination in the prefrontal cortex of socially isolated mice. Nat Neurosci 15:1621–1623. doi:10.1038/nn.3263 pmid:23143512
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Makinodan M, Rosen KM, Ito S, Corfas G (2012) A critical period for social experience-dependent oligodendrocyte maturation and myelination. Science 337:1357–1360. doi:10.1126/science.1220845 pmid:22984073
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Markham JA, Morris JR, Juraska JM (2007) Neuron number decreases in the rat ventral, but not dorsal, medial prefrontal cortex between adolescence and adulthood. Neuroscience 144:961–968. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.10.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Maroteaux M, Liu SJ (2016) Alteration of AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission by Alexa Fluor 488 and 594 in cerebellar stellate cells. eNeuro 3. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0109-15.2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Mengler L, Khmelinskii A, Diedenhofen M, Po C, Staring M, Lelieveldt BPF, Hoehn M (2014) Brain maturation of the adolescent rat cortex and striatum: changes in volume and myelination. Neuroimage 84:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.034 pmid:23994458
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Michailov GV, Sereda MW, Brinkmann BG, Fischer TM, Haug B, Birchmeier C, Role L, Lai C, Schwab MH, Nave KA (2004) Axonal neuregulin-1 regulates myelin sheath thickness. Science 304:700–703. doi:10.1126/science.1095862 pmid:15044753
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    O’Muircheartaigh J, Dean DC, Ginestet CE, Walker L, Waskiewicz N, Lehman K, Dirks H, Piryatinsky I, Deoni SCL (2014) White matter development and early cognition in babies and toddlers. Hum Brain Mapp 35:4475–4487. doi:10.1002/hbm.22488 pmid:24578096
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Paxinos G, Watson C (1998) The rat brain: In: Stereotaxic coordinates, Ed 4. San Diego: Academic Press.
  48. ↵
    Paus T, Zijdenbos A, Worsley K, Collins DL, Blumenthal J, Giedd JN, Rapoport JL, Evans AC (1999) Structural maturation of neural pathways in children and adolescents: in vivo study. Science 283:1908–1911. pmid:10082463
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Pelletier JG, Paré D (2002) Uniform range of conduction times from the lateral amygdala to distributed perirhinal sites. J Neurophysiol 87:1213–1221. doi:10.1152/jn.00623.2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Perge JA, Niven JE, Mugnaini E, Balasubramanian V, Sterling P (2012) Why do axons differ in caliber? J Neurosci 32:626–638. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4254-11.2012 pmid:22238098
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Perrin JS, Hervé PY, Leonard G, Perron M, Pike GB, Pitiot A, Richer L, Veillette S, Pausova Z, Paus T (2008) Growth of white matter in the adolescent brain: role of testosterone and androgen receptor. J Neurosci 28:9519–9524. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1212-08.2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Peters A, Sethares C, Killiany RJ (2001) Effects of age on the thickness of myelin sheaths in monkey primary visual cortex. J Comp Neur 435:241–248. pmid:11391644
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  54. ↵
    Rasband WS (1997) ImageJ. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
  55. ↵
    Rushworth MFS, Hadland KA, Gaffan D, Passingham RE (2003) The effect of cingulate cortex lesions on task switching and working memory. J Cogn Neurosci 15:338–353. doi:10.1162/089892903321593072 pmid:12729487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Salami M, Itami C, Tsumoto T, Kimura F (2003) Change of conduction velocity by regional myelination yields constant latency irrespective of distance between thalamus and cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6174–6179. doi:10.1073/pnas.0937380100
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Seamans JK, Floresco SB, Phillips AG (1995) Functional differences between the prelimbic and anterior cingulate regions of the rat prefrontal cortex. Behav Neurosci 109:1063–1073. pmid:8748957
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Holmes CJ, Jernigan TL, Toga AW (1999) In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nat Neurosci 2:859–861. doi:10.1038/13154 pmid:10491602
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Sugihara I, Lang EJ, Llinás R (1993) Uniform olivocerebellar conduction time underlies Purkinje cell complex spike synchronicity in the rat cerebellum. J Physiol 470:243–271. pmid:8308729
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Swenson RS (2006) Review of clinical and functional neuroscience. In: Educational review manual in neurology (Holmes GL, ed). New York, NY: Castle Connolly Graduate Medical Publishing.
  61. ↵
    Takenouchi K, Nishijo H, Uwano T, Tamura R, Takigawa M, Ono T (1999) Emotional and behavioral correlates of the anterior cingulate cortex during associative learning in rats. Neuroscience 93:1271–1287. pmid:10501451
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Thévenaz P, Unser M (2007) User-friendly semiautomated assembly of accurate image mosaics in microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 70:135–146. doi:10.1002/jemt.20393 pmid:17133410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    Tomassy GS, Berger DR, Chen HH, Kasthuri N, Hayworth KJ, Vercelli A, Seung HS, Lichtman JW, Arlotta P (2014) Distinct profiles of myelin distribution along single axons of pyramidal neurons in the neocortex. Science 344:319–324. doi:10.1126/science.1249766 pmid:24744380
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    van Aerde KI, Feldmeyer D (2015) Morphological and physiological characterization of pyramidal neuron subtypes in rat medial prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 25:788–805. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht278 pmid:24108807
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Vargas WM, Bengston L, Gilpin NW, Whitcomb BW, Richardson HN (2014) Alcohol binge drinking during adolescence or dependence during adulthood reduces prefrontal myelin in male rats. J Neurosci 34:14777–14782. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3189-13.2014 pmid:25355229
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    Vostrikov V, Uranova N (2011) Age-related increase in the number of oligodendrocytes is dysregulated in schizophrenia and mood disorders. Schizophr Res Treatment 2011:174689. doi:10.1155/2011/174689 pmid:22937261
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    Wang Y, Markram H, Goodman PH, Berger TK, Ma J, Goldman-Rakic PS (2006) Heterogeneity in the pyramidal network of the medial prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 9:534–542. doi:10.1038/nn1670 pmid:16547512
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Wartman BC, Gabel J, Holahan MR (2014) Inactivation of the anterior cingulate reveals enhanced reliance on cortical networks for remote spatial memory retrieval after sequential memory processing. PLoS One 9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108711
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Waxman SG (1980) Determinants of conduction velocity in myelinated nerve fibers. Muscle Nerve 3:141–150. doi:10.1002/mus.880030207 pmid:6245357
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Willing J, Juraska JM (2015) The timing of neuronal loss across adolescence in the medial prefrontal cortex of male and female rats. Neuroscience 301:268–275. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.073 pmid:26047728
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Cheryl Sisk, Michigan State University

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Janice M Juraska, Douglas Dean.

Reviewers agreed that this is a well-needed study that relates the conduction speed of cortical efferents to their myelination status during the developmental period when cortical myelination is most accelerated - between the juvenile and adolescent period. Specifically, the study examined age-dependent changes of axonal populations extending from the anterior corpus callosum to the medial dorsal prefrontal cortex, in particular cells from the anterior cingulate. The authors find that the conduction velocity is significantly impacted in monosynaptic cells between the anterior corpus callosum and anterior cingulate, with this velocity 1.5-2x as fast in adolescence compared to the pre-adolescence cells. Moreover, transmission distance and latency were not observed to be significantly correlated, however, conduction velocity and distance were positively related, suggesting conduction velocity was higher in axons projecting to a larger distance. G-ratio, average diameter of axons and the range of axon diameters were also not observed to change preadolescence to adolescence. The results suggest that ongoing myelination plays a critical role to neurotransmission speed and that this speed continues to develop into adolescence. Overall, the manuscript is well written, and the findings are of interest.

Reviewers noted many strong aspects to the study; however, there are also some concerns that need to be addressed in a revised manuscript.

1. The potentially most problematic issue is the origin of the animals in the study. In the Methods, it is stated that “Male Wistar rats were ordered from Charles River.” Were animals as young as PD 8-15 shipped (presumably with their mother and litter)? The amount of stress from such a shipment would influence the results, especially the timing since corticosteroids decrease myelination (eg, Chari et al., 2006). Even the adolescent males would be affected by shipping. Ideally, this experiment should have been conducted with animals that were bred and/or born in house. Please be more explicit in the Methods about whether pregnant dams were shipped, whether the animals used in the study were born in the lab, or whether they arrived with their mothers. The shipment of animals is a serious drawback to the study and the effects, especially through maternal behavioral changes, may limit the how well the study will generalize. Therefore, please also include a discussion of the potential confound that the stress associated with shipping could have had on the study, since stress can interfere with myelination and other aspects of morphology as well.

2. The study is framed as myelination being part of the behavioral/functional change that occurs in the prefrontal cortex during adolescence. That may be true, but myelination occurs in other cortical areas as well in the same time frame. There has been a considerable body of work on the splenium of the corpus callosum, which is comprised of axons mainly from the occipital cortex, in several mammalian species. In the rat, Kim and Juraska (1997) found a rapid increase in myelination between PD15 and PD25 and again to PD60 in the splenium as well as stability in axon diameter for myelinated axons between these ages; females were also examined. The cortical axons across areas may be myelinating in a nearly simultaneous manner. In general, the implication throughout the manuscript that the increase in myelination is especially important for behavioral changes seen in prefrontal functioning is overemphasized. The last sentence in the Abstract, in particular, needs to be revised since it is not cognitive speed, but rather cognitive mode, that changes between childhood and adolescence.

3. In describing the conduction velocity results between pre-adolescence and adolescence, it would be informative to include the mean and standard deviation of these velocity measurements within the text (not just Figure 1).

4. Similarly, please include the mean and standard deviations of the cross-sectional areas of the CCFM and number of axons between the pre-adolescence and adolescence ages within the text of the results. Please also include the mean and standard deviations of the g-ratios, average diameter of axons and the range of axon diameters, within the results.

5. In the introduction, the authors described fractional anisotropy as a MRI measure of myelin. One should be careful here, however, as fractional anisotropy is known not to be specific to myelin (see Jones, D. K., Knosche, T. R., & Turner, R. (2013). White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage, 73, 239-254. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081). The authors may want to mention this limitation.

6. The authors may also want to include additional developmental studies in their description of studies examining myelination in the context of cognitive development:

a. Chevalier N, Kurth S, Doucette MR, et al. Myelination Is Associated with Processing Speed in Early Childhood: Preliminary Insights. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139897.

b. O'Muircheartaigh J, Dean DC, 3rd, Ginestet CE, et al. White matter development and early cognition in babies and toddlers. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(9):4475-4487.

c. Deoni SC, O'Muircheartaigh J, Elison JT, et al. White matter maturation profiles through early childhood predict general cognitive ability. Brain Struct Funct. 2016;221(2):1189-1203.

7. As the authors describe MRI methods in human subjects, another area of future direction could be comparison of myelin MRI techniques to the measures that are performed here. Comparisons of histological and MRI based measures would help inform on associations observed in humans. The authors may also wish to discuss this point.

8. On a more minor note: the photomicrographs in Figure 2D do not have good resolution; perhaps some arrows with more explanation would help or better photos. Are the coronal section in Figure 2A and the Visual Abstract at the same anterior/posterior level? How was this determined?

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 4
July/August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Myelination of Axons Corresponds with Faster Transmission Speed in the Prefrontal Cortex of Developing Male Rats
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Myelination of Axons Corresponds with Faster Transmission Speed in the Prefrontal Cortex of Developing Male Rats
Sean McDougall, Wanette Vargas Riad, Andrea Silva-Gotay, Elizabeth R. Tavares, Divya Harpalani, Geng-Lin Li, Heather N. Richardson
eNeuro 31 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0203-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0203-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Myelination of Axons Corresponds with Faster Transmission Speed in the Prefrontal Cortex of Developing Male Rats
Sean McDougall, Wanette Vargas Riad, Andrea Silva-Gotay, Elizabeth R. Tavares, Divya Harpalani, Geng-Lin Li, Heather N. Richardson
eNeuro 31 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0203-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0203-18.2018
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • anterior cingulate
  • conduction velocity
  • forceps minor
  • g-ratio
  • myelin whole-cell patch clamp

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Heterozygous Dab1 null mutation disrupts neocortical and hippocampal development
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
Show more New Research

Development

  • Heterozygous Dab1 null mutation disrupts neocortical and hippocampal development
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.