Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Neuronal Excitability

The Nogo Receptor Ligand LGI1 Regulates Synapse Number and Synaptic Activity in Hippocampal and Cortical Neurons

Rhalena A. Thomas, Julien Gibon, Carol X. Q. Chen, Sabrina Chierzi, Vincent G. Soubannier, Stephanie Baulac, Philippe Séguéla, Keith Murai and Philip A. Barker
eNeuro 27 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0185-18.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0185-18.2018
Rhalena A. Thomas
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julien Gibon
2Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia V1V 1V7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Julien Gibon
Carol X. Q. Chen
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabrina Chierzi
3Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Centre for Research in Neuroscience, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, H3H2R9, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent G. Soubannier
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Baulac
4Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie Université Paris 06, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, 75005, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 1127, Paris, 75006, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7225, Paris, France; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière), Paris, 75006, France; Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, 75013, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Séguéla
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith Murai
3Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Centre for Research in Neuroscience, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, H3H2R9, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip A. Barker
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada
2Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia V1V 1V7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Exogenous application of LGI1 promotes synapse formation. A, Representative images from 18 DIV cultures hippocampal neuron labeled with Syn1 (red), PSD95 (green), and MAP2 (blue) in the absence and presence of exogenous LGI1 (6 DIV treatment). B, Magnification of sample images; the panel labeled “count” indicates colocalized particles of Syn1 and PSD95 considered to be synaptic puncta. C, Quantification of synaptic density indicated by colocalized puncta per µm of MAP2-labeled dendrites excluding the cell bodies. Data are shown as box plots with whiskers from 1st to 99th percentile. Differences were analyzed by unpaired t tests, ***p = 0.0007; N = 34 WT and 29 treatment neurons from three separate cultures (8–14 images were included for each condition in each experiment).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    NgR1 regulates synapse number in dissociated hippocampal neurons. Analysis of synapse density from cultured hippocampal neurons grown on coverslips for 15 or 18 DIV. A, Representative images from 18 DIV cultures labeled with Syn1 (red), PSD95 (green), and MAP2 (blue), genotypes are indicated. B, Magnification of sample images shown in the white box in A used for quantification. The panel labeled “count” indicates colocalized particles of Syn1 and PSD95 considered to be synaptic puncta. C, Quantification of synaptic density indicated by colocalized puncta per µm of MAP2-labeled dendrites excluding the cell bodies for 15 DIV cultures. D, Same as C but for 18 DIV cultures. Values in quantification were normalized to WT littermates within each culture. Data are shown as Box plots with whiskers from 1st to 99th percentile. NgR1-/- neurons display significantly more synapses than NgR1+/+ littermates. For 15 DIV cultures, NgR1+/+ n = 29 neurons and NgR1-/- n = 28 neurons from three cultures. For 18 DIV cultures, NgR1+/+ n = 25 neurons and NgR1-/- n = 31 neurons from three separate cultures. Differences were analyzed by unpaired t tests, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    LGI1 regulates synapse number in dissociated hippocampal neurons. Analysis of synapse density from hippocampal neurons dissociated from E16 embryos grown on coverslips for 15 or 18 DIV. Panels A, B show representative images from 18 DIV cultures labeled with Syn1 (red), PSD95 (green), and MAP2 (blue), genotypes are indicated. Sample images of LGI1+/+ and LGI1-/- neurons used in analysis of synaptic density, quantified from the number of colocalized Syn1 and PSD95 puncta per μm of MAP2-labeled dendrites excluding the cell bodies. B, Enlarged images from the box highlighted in A. The far right panel indicated “count” shows the colocalized puncta representing the synapse. Values in quantification were normalized to WT littermates within each culture. Data are shown as box plots with whiskers from 1st to 99th percentile. LGI1-/- neurons have significantly fewer synapses than LGI1+/+ littermates. C, Synapse density quantified from 15 DIV cultures. D, Synapse density quantified from 18 DIV cultures. LGI1+/+ n = 40 neurons from four cultures, LGI1-/- n = 40 from four cultures; ***p < 0.001 (unpaired t test).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    NgR1 and LGI1 regulate synaptic proteins in cortical neurons in vitro. A, Twiss filter schematic showing culture system to coculture hippocampal neurons with astrocytes and separate neuronal processes from cell bodies. Hippocampal neurons seeded on filters with a pore size 1 µm that cell bodies will not pass through. Axons and dendrites grow on the filter tops and extend down onto the filter bottom. Astrocytes are seeded on the bottom of the well to provide growth factors. B, Time course of lysates from hippocampal neurons grown on filters suspended over an astrocyte feeder layer for the times indicated. The first lane in the left panel labeled E16 is a sample of hippocampal neurons lysed directly after dissociated before plating. Lysates from filter tops including cell bodies and processes are on the left. Lysates of the filter bottoms containing axons and dendrites but no cell bodies are on the right. Antibodies used to probe the lysates are indicated on the right. Histone-3 (H3), a structural protein found in chromatin and present only in the nucleus is detected only in the cell body lysates. C, Lysates from filter bottoms containing axons and dendrite but not cell bodies from LGI1+/+ and LGI1-/- littermates of cortical cultures grown for the indicated number of DIV. D, Quantification of PSD95 levels relative to actin levels and normalized to WT controls in LGI1 samples at 12, 15, and 18 DIV, n = 3 separate experiments. E, Western blottings of lysates from filter bottoms of NgR1+/+ and NgR1-/- cortical cultures harvested at 12, 15, or 18 DIV synaptic markers, Syn and PSD95. Actin and Tuj1 are loading controls. F, Quantification of PSD95 relative to actin levels and normalized to WT controls in NgR1, n = 4 separate experiments. Significant differences are indicated on the graphs analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    LGI1 normally suppresses RhoA activity in cultured cortical neurons. A total of 15 DIV cortical neurons from LGI1-/- mice have increased RhoA activation compared to WT cultures. A, Western blottings of input RhoA and active RhoA bound to GST-rhotekin beads (GST-RBD) that bind to GTP-RhoA. The lower panel corresponds to the membrane labeled with Ponceau showing total GST protein. B, Quantification of active GTP-RhoA relative to total RhoA input levels and normalized WT values for each of four experiments. Active GTP-RhoA is significantly higher in lysates from LGI1-/- cortical neurons compared to LGI1+/+ controls, 71% higher, p = 0.0257, analyzed by unpaired t test; N = 4 separate experiments.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    LGI1 regulates a NgR1-TROY receptor complex. A, Sample images of COS7 cells transfected with control GFP only; NgR1; TROY; NgR1 + TROY: LGI1; NgR1 + LGI1; TROY + LGI1; NgR1 + TROY + LGI1, together labeled with rhodamine-WGA. COS7 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids and seeded at low density on glass coverslips. In all conditions GFP was cotransfected to follow the expression of the other proteins. Cell membranes were labeled with rhodamine-tagged WGA to visualize cells and measure cell area. B, Area of the cells was quantified using ImageJ Analyze Particles tools. The graph indicates the effect of expression of no receptors (GFP control), each receptor alone, or with LGI1 (indicated in red). Expression of LGI1, NgR1, or TROY separately in COS7 cells has no effect on cell size compared to GFP alone. However, NgR1 and TROY expression together decrease cell size compared to GFP expression alone, p < 0.05 indicated by # on the graph. Coexpression of LGI1 together with NgR1 and TROY rescues cell size. This condition is not significantly different from GFP alone. Analysis by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests, ***p < 0.001; n = 5 where each n is the average area in one separate experiment. For each experiment the areas of 50–100 cells were quantified.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Dendritic spine density and morphology is regulated by LGI1 in vivo. A, Sample images of dendritic spines labeled with DiI from acute hippocampal slices from P10 LGI1+/+ (left) and LGI1-/- (right) mice. Segments were taken from the primary bifurcation point from CA1 pyramidal neurons shown in the upper images. The selected region if dendrite is shown below with arrows indicating mushroom spines (yellow), stubby spines (blue, thin arrowheads), and thin spines (green, wide arrowheads). Images were manually traced using the measure tool in ImageJ. B, Quantification of total spine-like protrusion density in spines per µm of dendrite. There is a non-significant trend toward fewer spine-link protrusions in LGI1-/- mice and WT controls (unpaired t test, p = 0.17). C, Proportion of spines categorized based on ratios of the width of the spine head (Hw) to width of the spine neck (Nw) to the spine length, mushroom spines (Hw:Nw > 1.5), stubby spines (Hw:Nw < 1.5 and L:Nw < 1.5), and thin spines (Hw:Nw < 1.5 and L:Nw > 1.5). The proportion of mushroom spines is significantly less in LGI1-/- slices compared to WT controls (p = 0.03), stubby spines trend toward an increase (p = 0.08), and the proportion of thin spines is unchanged, analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests. D, Quantification of mushroom type protrusions per µm of dendrite. The density of mushroom type spines is significantly decreased in LGI1-/- slices compared to WT controls, compared by Student’s t test (*p = 0.04). E, Measurements of spine length, neck width, and head width for total spines, significant differences indicated on the graph (*p = 0.031), analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests. F, Measurements of spine length, neck width, and head width for mushroom type spines, significant differences indicated on the graph (*p = 0.034) analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests. For spine analysis n = 6 animals for each genotype, littermates from three separate experiments, four to six spine segments per animal were quantified.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    LGI1 deletion alters synaptic activity in the hippocampus. Recordings of mEPSC of CA1 pyramidal neurons in acute hippocampal slices from P10 (A-C) LGI1-/-, and LGI1+/+ littermates. A, Representative traces of mEPSCs. B, Cumulative probability plot of interevent intervals with inserts showing average values and SE bars. C, Cumulative probability graph of mEPSC amplitude, with inserts showing average values and SE bars. Statistical comparisons for mEPSCs were made from cumulative probability data using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, ***p < 0.001; n > 2000 events from 7 to 12 cells from three to four separate animals. D, Paired-pulse ratio measurement; quantification of the ratio of eEPSC amplitude between the first and second pulse, WT n = 11 cells, LGI1-/- n = 12 cells. We found no significant differences between pulses, analyzed by t test. E, Sample traces of paired-pulse facilitation of CA3-CA1 with 100 ms between pulses. F, Quantification of eEPSC in CA1 neurons after the first stimulation of Schaffer collaterals in the CA3 n = 60 traces for WT and n = 59 traces for LGI1-/- condition ***p < 0.0001 (t test).

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 4
July/August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Nogo Receptor Ligand LGI1 Regulates Synapse Number and Synaptic Activity in Hippocampal and Cortical Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Nogo Receptor Ligand LGI1 Regulates Synapse Number and Synaptic Activity in Hippocampal and Cortical Neurons
Rhalena A. Thomas, Julien Gibon, Carol X. Q. Chen, Sabrina Chierzi, Vincent G. Soubannier, Stephanie Baulac, Philippe Séguéla, Keith Murai, Philip A. Barker
eNeuro 27 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0185-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0185-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
The Nogo Receptor Ligand LGI1 Regulates Synapse Number and Synaptic Activity in Hippocampal and Cortical Neurons
Rhalena A. Thomas, Julien Gibon, Carol X. Q. Chen, Sabrina Chierzi, Vincent G. Soubannier, Stephanie Baulac, Philippe Séguéla, Keith Murai, Philip A. Barker
eNeuro 27 August 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0185-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0185-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • epilepsy
  • leucine-rich glioma-inactivated gene 1
  • RhoA
  • synaptic activity
  • synaptic plasticity
  • TROY

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Motor protein disruption critically alters organelle trafficking and excitation contraction coupling
  • Spike generation in electroreceptor afferents introduces additional spectral response components by weakly nonlinear interactions
  • Galanin Inhibits Histaminergic Neurons via Galanin Receptor 1
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.