Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Development

ApoE Regulates the Development of Adult Newborn Hippocampal Neurons

Yacine Tensaouti, Elizabeth P. Stephanz, Tzong-Shiue Yu and Steven G. Kernie
eNeuro 30 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0155-18.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0155-18.2018
Yacine Tensaouti
1Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth P. Stephanz
1Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tzong-Shiue Yu
1Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tzong-Shiue Yu
Steven G. Kernie
1Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032
2Department of Neurology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steven G. Kernie
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Type 1 NSPCs express nestin, ApoE, and GFAP, while mature granule cells make connections with astrocytes expressing ApoE and GFAP. A–D, Representative confocal images of the dentate gyrus illustrate nestin-expressing (red), ApoE-expressing (green), and GFAP-expressing (blue) cells, along with a merged image of all channels. E–H, High-power representative confocal images taken from the region in the inset in D illustrate nestin-expressing (red), ApoE-expressing (green), and GFAP-expressing (blue) cells, along with a merged image of all channels. White arrows indicate nestin-ApoE-GFAP triple-positive cells, representing type 1 NSPCs. I–L, Representative confocal images of the dentate gyrus illustrate tdTomato-expressing (red), ApoE-expressing (green), and GFAP-expressing (blue) cells, along with a merged image of all channels. M–P, High-power representative confocal images taken from the region in the inset in L illustrate tdTomato-expressing (red), ApoE-expressing (green), and GFAP-expressing (blue) cells, along with a merged image of all channels. White arrows indicate GFAP and ApoE coexpressing astrocytes. GL, Granule layer; HIL, hilus. Scale bars: D, 100 µm; H, 75 µm; L, 100 µm; P, 25 µm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    ApoE deficiency leads to a decrease in overall proliferation, the number of type 1 NSPCs, and type 1 NSPC proliferation in the dentate gyrus, while leaving the ability of newborn cells to survive and differentiate into granular neurons unimpaired. A–C, Unbiased stereological quantification of the number of BrdU-positive cells (A), the number of BrdU-Prox1 double-positive cells (B), and the percentage of BrdU-positive cells that also express Prox1 (C). D–K, Representative confocal images of the SGZ in WT and ApoE-deficient mice illustrate nestin-expressing (green), Ki67-expressing (red), and GFAP-expressing (blue) cells, along with a merged image of all channels. White arrows indicate nestin-Ki67-GFAP triple-positive cells, representing actively proliferating type 1 NSPCs. L–N, Unbiased stereological quantification of the number of Ki67-positive cells (L), the number of nestin-GFAP double-positive cells (M), and the number of nestin-GFAP-Ki67 triple-positive cells (N). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Unpaired Student’s t tests, *p < 0.05. Scale bar, K, 50 µm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The complexity as well as the total dendritic length of ApoE-deficient adult-born granule cells are significantly reduced. A, B, Representative 3D-reconstructed adult-born granule cells (4 weeks after stereotactic injections), one circle every 10 µm. C, Distance between the soma and the first dendritic division (in µm). D, Nodes were defined as the number of divisions of dendritic branches. E, Cumulative length of dendritic arborization (in µm). F, Span of the dendritic arborization when projected on two dimensions. G, Sholl analysis: the number of dendritic intersections as a function of the distance from the soma: wild type, 78 neurons/4 mice; ApoE-deficient, 73 neurons/7 mice. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Independent t test and two-way-ANOVA with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD post hoc tests were used: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Scale bar, B, 50 µm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    The complexity and the total dendritic length of ApoE4 adult-born granule cells are significantly reduced. A, B, Representative 3D-reconstructed adult-born granule cells (4 weeks after stereotactic injections), one circle every 10 µm. Representative picture of 4-week-old retrovirally labeled adult-born granule cells in the dentate gyrus. C, Distance between the soma and the first dendritic intersection (in µm). D, Nodes defined as the number of divisions of dendritic branches. E, Cumulative length of dendritic arborizations (in µm). F, Span of the dendritic arborizations when projected on two dimensions. G, Sholl analysis: number of dendritic intersections as a function of the distance from the soma. ApoE3, 75 neurons/6 mice; ApoE4, 69 neurons/4 mice. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Independent t test and two-way ANOVA with uncorrected Fisher’s LSD post hoc tests were used: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Scale bar, B, 50 µm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Decrease in the proportion of complex and increase of less complex adult-born granule cells in ApoE-deficient and ApoE4 mice. A, Each population of 3D-reconstructed neurons was divided as a function of the number of nodes (≤4, ≥5, 6…10, 11 nodes or more) and expressed as a percentage of the sample function of the different genotypes: wild type (4 mice, 78 neurons); ApoE-deficient (7 mice, 73 neurons); ApoE3 (6 mice, 75 neurons); and ApoE4 mice (4 mice, 69 neurons). B, Representative pictures of 3D-reconstructed wild-type adult-born granule cells 4 weeks after GFP retroviral infection at different levels of dendritic complexity. C1, C2, E1, E2, Representative pictures of dendritic fragments from wild-type (C1), ApoE-deficient (C2), ApoE3 (E1), and ApoE4 (E2) mature adult-born granule cells. D, F, Spine density quantification in ApoE-deficient (51 fragments from five mice) compared with wild-type (58 fragments from four mice) mice expressed as spines/µm ± SEM, and in ApoE4 (46 fragments from four mice) compared with ApoE3 mice (44 fragments from four mice). Independent t test: ****p < 0.0001. Scale bar, E2, 5 µm.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Key resources table, highlighting the genetically modified organisms and strains, viruses and software essential to reproduce results presented in the manuscript

    Reagent or resourceSourceIdentifier
    Bacterial and virus strains
    Moloney murine leukemia viral vectors, RV-CAG-eGFP or RV-CAG-eGFPcreGT3 Core Facility of the Salk InstituteNIH-NCI CCSG: P30 014195, NINDS R24 Core Grant, NEI
    Experimental models: organisms/strains
    B6.129P2-Apoetm1Unc/JThe Jackson LaboratoryCatalog #JAX:002052; RRID:IMSR_JAX:002052, https://www.jax.org/strain/002052
    B6.129P2-Apoetm2(APOE*3)Mae N8TaconicCatalog #TAC:1548; RRID:IMSR_TAC:1548, https://www.taconic.com/transgenic-mouse-model/apoe3
    B6.129P2-Apoetm3(APOE*4)Mae N8TaconicCatalog #TAC:1549; RRID:IMSR_TAC:1549, https://www.taconic.com/transgenic-mouse-model/apoe4
    B6;129S6-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/JThe Jackson LaboratoryCatalog #JAX: 007909; RRID:IMSR_JAX:007905, https://www.jax.org/strain/007905
    C57BL/6JThe Jackson LaboratoryCatalog #JAX:000664; RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664, https://www.jax.org/strain/000664
    Software
    Adobe PhotoshopAdobeRRID:SCR_014199, https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html
    AutoQuantMedia CyberneticsRRID:SCR_002465, http://www.mediacy.com/index.aspx?page=AutoQuant
    PrismGraphPad SoftwareRRID:SCR_015807, https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/
    Neurolucidambf BIOSCIENCERRID:SCR_001775, http://www.mbfbioscience.com/neurolucida
    Stereo Investigatormbf BIOSCIENCERRID:SCR_002526, http://www.mbfbioscience.com/stereo-investigator
    • RRID, Research resource identifiers (https://scicrunch.org/resources).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    List of antibodies used and concentrations

    TargetDescriptionProviderDilutionRRID
    GFPRabbit polyclonalInvitrogen1:500Catalog #A-11122; RRID:AB_221569
    BrdURat monoclonalAbcam1:500Catalog #ab6326; RRID:AB_305426
    GFAPGuinea Pig polyclonalMyBioSource1:500Catalog #MBS834682
    Ki67Rabbit monoclonalThermo Fisher Scientific1:500Catalog #RM-9106-S0; RRID:AB_2341197
    Prox1Rabbit polyclonalAbcam1:500Catalog #ab101851; RRID:AB_10712211
    ApoEGoat polyclonalEMD Millipore1:5000Catalog #AB947; RRID:AB_2258475
    RabbitBiotin Goat polyclonalJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories1:200Catalog #111-065-003; RRID:AB_2337959
    GoatBiotin Donkey polyclonalJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories1:200Catalog #705-065-147; RRID:AB_2340397
    RatA488 Donkey polyclonalJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories1:200Catalog #712-546-153; RRID:AB_2340686
    RabbitA488 Donkey polyclonalJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories1:200Catalog #711-545-152; RRID:AB_2313584
    Guinea pigA647 Donkey polyclonalJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories1:200Catalog #706-605-148; RRID:AB_2340476
    RabbitA647 Donkey polyclonalJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories1:200Catalog #711-605-152; RRID:AB_2492288
    BiotinA488 Streptavidin polyclonalJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories1:200Catalog #016-540-084; RRID:AB_2337249
    Goat serumNormal Goat Serum antibodyJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories5%Catalog #005-000-121; RRID:AB_2336990
    Donkey serumNormal Donkey Serum antibodyJackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories5%Catalog #017-000-121; RRID:AB_2337258
    • RRID, Research resource identifier (https://scicrunch.org/resources).

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Summary of statistics.

    Table analyzedStatistical testp valueSize effectt valuedfR2F value
    WT vs KOBrdU countsUnpaired Student’s t test0.84690.600.49480.0299.72
    p = 0.049
    BrdU-Prox1 colocalizationUnpaired Student’s t test0.67840.230.365280.0165.473
    p = 0.1284
    % Newborn neuronsUnpaired Student’s t test0.22140.190.298380.0111.266
    p = 0.8249
    Nestin-Ki67-GFAPUnpaired Student’s t test0.03761.882.65860.54088.054
    p = 0.1204
    Nestin-GFAPUnpaired Student’s t test.02912.022.85160.5751.639
    p = 0.6947
    Ki67Unpaired Student’s t test0.03332.472.7560.55761.015
    p = 0.9903
    Length of the first branchUnpaired Student’s t test0.16580.231.3931490.01281.284
    p = 0.2817
    Number of nodesUnpaired Student’s t test0.00010.653.9391490.09431.617
    p = 0.0406
    DA cumulative lengthUnpaired Student’s t test0.11170.261.61490.01691.133
    p = 0.5929
    DA spanUnpaired Student’s t test0.00320.492.9671490.055783.387
    p = 0.0001
    Sholl analysis
    Intersection effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(26,4023) = 2.488
    Row effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(26,4023) = 163.7
    Column effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(1,4023) = 37.46
    Spine densityUnpaired Student’s t test<0.00011.134.1631070.13941.016
    p = 0.9479
    E3 vs E4BrdU CountsUnpaired Student’s t test0.89610.0940.13570.0026122.668
    p = 0.4463
    BrdU-Prox1 colocalizationUnpaired Student’s t test0.58380.400.57470.044983.759
    p = 0.3053
    % Newborn neuronsUnpaired Student’s t test0.10971.221.83270.3241.234
    p = 0.8143
    Nestin-Ki67-GFAPUnpaired Student’s t test0.4860.520.741960.61851.875
    p = 0.6185
    Nestin-GFAPUnpaired Student’s t test0.37000.690.968960.13511.191
    p = 0.8891
    Ki67Unpaired Student’s t test0.27950.841.18960.19062.6
    p = 0.4533
    Length of the first branchUnpaired Student’s t test0.89490.0230.1321420.0001231.09
    p = 0.7196
    Number of nodesUnpaired Student’s t test0.00070.593.4721420.078261.408, p = 0.1542
    DA cumulative lengthUnpaired Student’s t test<0.00010.74.1271420.10711.783, p = 0.0166
    DA SpanUnpaired Student’s t test0.59780.090.5281420.0019651.296, p = 0.2749
    Sholl analysis
    Intersection effectTwo-way ANOVA0.0013F(26,3834) = 2.048
    Row effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(26,3834) = 144.7
    Column effectTwo-way ANOVA<0.0001F(1,3834) = 112.8
    Spine densityUnpaired Student’s t test<0.00011.135.278880.24052.08
    p = 0.0173
    • D, Dendritic arborization. Cohen’s d value was calculated as Embedded Image with Embedded Image , d = 0.2, d = 0.5, and d = 0.8 corresponding to small, medium, and large size effects, respectively

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 4
July/August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ApoE Regulates the Development of Adult Newborn Hippocampal Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
ApoE Regulates the Development of Adult Newborn Hippocampal Neurons
Yacine Tensaouti, Elizabeth P. Stephanz, Tzong-Shiue Yu, Steven G. Kernie
eNeuro 30 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0155-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0155-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
ApoE Regulates the Development of Adult Newborn Hippocampal Neurons
Yacine Tensaouti, Elizabeth P. Stephanz, Tzong-Shiue Yu, Steven G. Kernie
eNeuro 30 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0155-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0155-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • APOE
  • dentate gyrus
  • neurogenesis

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Development

  • sAPPα Inhibits Neurite Outgrowth in Primary Mouse Neurons via GABA B Receptor Subunit 1a
  • Partial Deletion of Cxcl12 from Hippocampal Cajal–Retzius Cells Does Not Disrupt Dentate Gyrus Development or Neurobehaviors
  • Absence of Testes at Puberty Impacts Functional Development of Nigrostriatal But Not Mesoaccumbal Dopamine Terminals in a Wild-Derived Mouse
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.