Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Neuronal Excitability

ΔFosB Decreases Excitability of Dorsal Hippocampal CA1 Neurons

Andrew L. Eagle, Elizabeth S. Williams, Joseph A. Beatty, Charles L. Cox and Alfred J. Robison
eNeuro 23 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0104-18.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0104-18.2018
Andrew L. Eagle
Department of Physiology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew L. Eagle
Elizabeth S. Williams
Department of Physiology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph A. Beatty
Department of Physiology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles L. Cox
Department of Physiology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfred J. Robison
Department of Physiology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    ΔFosB regulates spike number in hippocampal CA1 neurons. A, Experimental timeline. B, Representative spikes from 125 pA depolarizing current injection in dHPC CA1 neurons transduced by HSV-GFP (GFP), HSV-GFP+ΔFosB (ΔFosB), and HSV-GFP + ΔJunD (ΔJunD). C, Spike (AP) number across increasing depolarizing current steps (25–250 pA) for GFP (n = 21 cells; n = 8 mice), ΔFosB (n = 19 cells; n = 9 mice), and ΔJunD (n = 14 cells; n = 5 mice). The number of APs was significantly decreased by ΔFosB, and increased by ΔJunD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). Inset, Total number of APs across all steps. Total spikes were similarly regulated by ΔFosB. *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). D, Rheobase (in pA) in GFP-, ΔFosB-, and ΔJunD-expressing cells. Rheobase was significantly increased by ΔFosB expression. *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). E, Rheobase spike peak amplitude (in mV). Spike amplitude was significantly decreased by ΔFosB expression. *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). F, Rheobase spike half-width (in ms). No differences were observed. G, Mean spike amplitude (in mV) elicited by 125 pA depolarizing current injection. Spike amplitudes at 125 pA current were significantly decreased by ΔFosB expression. *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). H, Mean spike half-width (in ms) elicited by 125 pA depolarizing current injection. No differences were observed. All graphs display means ± SEM.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    ΔFosB enhances spike frequency adaptation. A, Representative spikes at maximal depolarizing current injection in dHPC CA1 neurons transduced by HSV-GFP (GFP), HSV-GFP + ΔFosB (ΔFosB), and HSV-GFP + ΔJunD (ΔJunD). B, The maximal depolarizing current was used to assess spike frequency adaptation among GFP (n = 21 cells; n = 8 mice), ΔFosB (n = 19 cells; n = 9 mice), and ΔJunD (n = 14 cells; n = 5 mice). No differences were observed in maximal current; p > 0.05 (one-way ANOVA). C, Mean ISI (in ms) at the maximal step across groups. Mean ISI was increased by ΔFosB; *p < 0.05 compared with GFP (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). D, Number of APs at the maximal step across groups. ΔFosB significantly decreased the number APs; *p < 0.05 compared with GFP (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). E, Latency from the onset of the maximal step and the first spike was assessed for each group. ΔFosB increased the latency compared with GFP; *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). F, ISI for the first and last pair of spikes at the maximal step for each group. ISI at the last pair of spikes was increased by ΔFosB compared with GFP; **p < 0.01 (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). All graphs display means ± SEM.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    ΔFosB decreases Ih. A–C, Representative voltage trace to a hyperpolarizing current step showing Ih in hippocampal CA1 neurons expressing GFP (n = 21 cellls; n = 8 mice), ΔFosB (n = 19 cells; n = 9 mice), and ΔJunD (n = 13 cells; n = 5 mice), respectively. Arrows indicate amplitude measured at peak and S.S. D−F, I–V curves from hyperpolarizing current injections (0 to −500 pA) at peak and S.S. in GFP, ΔFosB, and ΔJunD cells. GFP cells had significant differences between peak and S.S. across currents (from −500 to −200 pA), indicative of Ih. ***p < 0.001 (two-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). Differences between peak and S.S. were comparably reduced in both ΔFosB (only different at steps −400 and −300 pA) and ΔJunD groups (only at −300 pA), indicative of reduced Ih. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (two-way ANOVAs; Holm–Sidak comparisons). G, H, Mean maximal negative current and voltage (produced by maximal negative current), respectively, in GFP, ΔFosB, and ΔJunD cells. No differences were observed between groups; p > 0.05 (one-way ANOVA). I, Difference between peak and S.S. at maximal negative current across groups. ΔFosB significantly decreased the difference compared with GFP; **p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). J, Sag ratio (S.S./peak at maximal negative current ratio) across groups. ΔFosB significantly increased the sag ratio (decreased Ih) compared with GFP; *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). All graphs display means ± SEM.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    ΔFosB decreases spontaneous EPSC amplitude. A, Representative traces (−80 mV) showing sEPSCs in hippocampal CA1 neurons expressing GFP (n = 20 cells; n = 7 mice), ΔFosB (n = 16 cells; n = 6 mice), and ΔJunD (n = 9 cells; n = 5 mice). B, sEPSC frequency (in Hz) across groups. No differences in sEPSC frequency were observed. C, sEPSC peak amplitude (in pA) across groups. Both ΔFosB and ΔJunD reduced sEPSC amplitude compared with GFP; *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). D, Cumulative fraction of the peak amplitudes (5–30 pA) across groups. Both ΔFosB and ΔJunD were shifted to the left from GFP. All graphs display means ± SEM.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Blockade of ΔFosB enhances AMPA/NMDA ratio. A, Representative average number of evoked EPSCs at −70 and +40 mV in dHPC CA1 neurons expressing GFP (n = 19 cells; n = 8 mice), ΔFosB (n = 13 cells; n = 9 mice), and ΔJunD (n = 10 cells; n = 4 mice). Red lines indicate the measurement for NMDA currents, 50 ms after stimulation. B, AMPA/NMDA ratios (normalized relative to GFP) across groups. ΔJunD significantly increased the AMPA/NMDA ratio compared with GFP. C, Decay tau for NMDA currents (weighted across both fast and slow components) across groups. ΔJunD significantly reduced NMDA decay tau; *p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA; Holm–Sidak comparisons). All graphs display means ± SEM.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Effects of ΔFosB overexpression or inhibition on properties of dorsal CA1 neurons.

    Cell propertyGFP
    (n = 21)
    ΔFosB
    (n = 19)
    ΔJunD
    (n = 14)
    Resting potential (mV)−66.7 ± 0.7−67.9 ± 1.1−66.3 -14.4
    Membrane capacitance (pF)71.6 ± 4.666.4 ± 5.460.0 ± 5.9
    Membrane resistance (MΩ)66.1 ± 9.058.9 ± 10.467.9 ± 7.9
    Access resistance (MΩ)18.7 ± 1.219.3 ± 1.318.7 ± 1.9
    Input resistance (MΩ)156.7 ± 11.9171.9 ± 25.6176.6 ± 15.2
    • Values are reported as the mean ± SEM.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 4
July/August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ΔFosB Decreases Excitability of Dorsal Hippocampal CA1 Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
ΔFosB Decreases Excitability of Dorsal Hippocampal CA1 Neurons
Andrew L. Eagle, Elizabeth S. Williams, Joseph A. Beatty, Charles L. Cox, Alfred J. Robison
eNeuro 23 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0104-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0104-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
ΔFosB Decreases Excitability of Dorsal Hippocampal CA1 Neurons
Andrew L. Eagle, Elizabeth S. Williams, Joseph A. Beatty, Charles L. Cox, Alfred J. Robison
eNeuro 23 July 2018, 5 (4) ENEURO.0104-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0104-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • ΔFosB
  • CA1
  • excitability
  • hippocampus
  • transcription factor

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Tolerance in thalamic paraventricular nucleus neurons following chronic treatment of animals with morphine
  • Investigating Mechanically Activated Currents from Trigeminal Neurons of Nonhuman Primates
  • Postnatal Development of Dendritic Morphology and Action Potential Shape in Rat Substantia Nigra Dopaminergic Neurons
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.