Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Development

Development of Parvalbumin-Expressing Basket Terminals in Layer II of the Rat Medial Entorhinal Cortex

Nina Berggaard, Ingvild E. Bjerke, Anna E. B. Paulsen, Linh Hoang, Nan E. T. Skogaker, Menno P. Witter and Johannes J. L. van der Want
eNeuro 11 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0438-17.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0438-17.2018
Nina Berggaard
1Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingvild E. Bjerke
1Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ingvild E. Bjerke
Anna E. B. Paulsen
1Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anna E. B. Paulsen
Linh Hoang
1Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Linh Hoang
Nan E. T. Skogaker
1Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Menno P. Witter
2Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience, Center for Computational Neuroscience, Egil and Pauline Braathen and Fred Kavli Center for Cortical Microcircuits, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Menno P. Witter
Johannes J. L. van der Want
1Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Position of regions of interest used for immuno-electron microscopy. a, Caudal view of rat brain, right hemisphere, without cerebellum, made by using the Waxholm Space Atlas (Kjonigsen et al., 2015; Papp et al., 2014). Red line signifies cutting plane, showing region from which parasagittal sections used in the study were taken. a, Example of parasagittal section of the caudal part of rat brain. Left: Waxholm Space Atlas representation showing subdivisions. Middle: Waxholm Space Atlas representation superimposed onto PV+ immunolabeled section used in study. Right: A corresponding PV+ immunolabeled vibratome section. Black lines delineate MEC LII. Red boxes show the dorsal and ventral positions from which the tissue was processed for further analysis. Scale bars: 1 mm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Typical neuronal somata within the dorsal and ventral portion of MEC LII at P10, P15, and P30. PV+ terminals (blue) forming synaptic contact onto somata (pink) are indicated by red arrows. The boxes indicate PV+ terminals shown in the enlarged figures just below the low-magnification images of the somata. Note that the ventral soma at P10 is apposed by only one PV+ terminal; thus, the first close-up image is of a PV+ labeled profile in the vicinity. so, soma; mit, mitochondria. Scale bars: images of somata, 5 µm; images of PV+ terminals, 500 nm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Box-and-whisker plots showing cross-sectional area of somata and number and density of PV+ perisomatic terminals per cell per thin section at P10, P15, and P30 in dorsal and ventral MEC LII. a, c, e, Changes in average cross-sectional soma area and number and density of PV+ terminals, respectively, during ontogeny in dorsal and ventral LII. b, d, f, Dorsoventral differences in average cross-sectional soma area and number and density of PV+ terminals, respectively, per time point. The middle bar of each box plot represents the population median, and the 25th and 75th percentiles are represented by the lower and upper boundaries of the boxes, respectively. The minimum and maximum values are represented by the lower and upper ends of the whiskers. Dots represent outliers, i.e., values that exceeded the 75th percentile + 1.5 × (75th percentile – 25th percentile). *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Cross-sections of typical PV+ terminals in dorsal and ventral part of MEC LII at P10, P15, and P30. Arrows (red) indicate synaptic contacts between PV+ terminals (blue) and somata (pink). so, soma; mit, mitochondria. Scale bars: 500 nm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Box-and-whisker plots of the cross-sectional area of PV+ terminals at P10, P15, and P30 in dorsal and ventral MEC LII. a, Changes during development of the cross-sectional area of PV+ terminals in dorsal and ventral MEC LII. b, Dorsoventral differences per time point. The middle bar of each box plot represents the population median, and the 25th and 75th percentiles are represented by the lower and upper boundaries of the boxes, respectively. The minimum and maximum values are represented by the lower and upper ends of the whiskers. Dots represent outliers, i.e., values that exceeded the 75th percentile + 1.5 × (75th percentile – 25th percentile). *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Cross-sectional soma area, percentage of soma sections with PV+ terminal apposition, number of PV+ perisomatic terminals per cell per thin section, and PV+ terminal density at P10, P15, and P30 in dorsal and ventral MEC LII

    Mean ± SEM or % (n cells)
    Age, postnatal daysDorsalVentral
    Cross-sectional area of somata (µm2)
    10172.94 ± 10.03 (39)131.91 ± 5.94 (47)
    15226.35 ± 14.56 (44)167.89 ± 5.90 (46)
    30253.62 ± 11.49 (47)172.29 ± 7.04 (46)
    Soma cross-sections with PV+ terminal apposition
    1082.1 (39)38.3 (47)
    15100 (44)95.6 (46)
    30100 (47)95.6 (46)
    Number of PV+ perisomatic terminals
    102.22 ± 0.28 (32)1.28 ± 0.11 (18)
    156.34 ± 0.52 (44)3.25 ± 0.22 (44)
    305.74 ± 0.44 (47)4.23 ± 0.36 (44)
    PV+ terminal density (%)
    103.64 ± 0.38 (32)2.58 ± 0.30 (18)
    158.93 ± 0.62 (44)5.50 ± 0.41 (44)
    308.71 ± 0.70 (47)6.97 ± 0.60 (44)
    • PV+ terminal density was calculated by dividing the total length of PV+ terminal membrane apposed to a given cross-sectional soma by the perimeter of that soma and multiplying by 100.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Cross-sectional area of PV+ terminals and percentage of PV+ terminals containing mitochondria at P10, P15, and P30 in dorsal and ventral MEC LII

    Age, postnatal daysMean ± SEM or % (n terminals)
    DorsalVentral
    Cross-sectional area of PV+ perisomatic terminals (µm2)
    100.52 ± 0.04 (98)0.59 ± 0.10 (23)
    150.36 ± 0.02 (294)0.32 ± 0.02 (149)
    300.51 ± 0.02 (217)0.38 ± 0.01 (195)
    PV+ terminals containing mitochondria
    1036.7 (98)30.4 (23)
    1539.1 (294)30.9 (149)
    3065.4 (217)63.6 (195)
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Statistically significant differences in PV+ terminals and somata between animals of same age group

    Mean ± SEM (n)
    VariableAge, daysRegion of MEC LIIAnimal 1Animal 2Test statistics and p value
    Soma cross-sectional area (µm2)10Ventral152.06 ± 6.68 (24 cells)110.88 ± 7.91 (23 cells)t(45) = 3.99, p < 0.001
    Number of PV+ terminals30Dorsal4.74 ± 0.43 (27 cells)7.10 ± 0.78 (20 cells)U = 160, p = 0.017
    PV+ terminal cross-sectional area (µm2)30Dorsal0.53 ± 0.28 (128 terminals)0.47 ± 0.25 (89 terminals)U = 4781, p = 0.044
    • The differences between individual animals of the same age group are shown, along with associated p values derived from independent t test (soma cross-sectional area) or Mann–Whitney U test (all other variables).

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 3
May/June 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of Parvalbumin-Expressing Basket Terminals in Layer II of the Rat Medial Entorhinal Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Development of Parvalbumin-Expressing Basket Terminals in Layer II of the Rat Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Nina Berggaard, Ingvild E. Bjerke, Anna E. B. Paulsen, Linh Hoang, Nan E. T. Skogaker, Menno P. Witter, Johannes J. L. van der Want
eNeuro 11 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0438-17.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0438-17.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Development of Parvalbumin-Expressing Basket Terminals in Layer II of the Rat Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Nina Berggaard, Ingvild E. Bjerke, Anna E. B. Paulsen, Linh Hoang, Nan E. T. Skogaker, Menno P. Witter, Johannes J. L. van der Want
eNeuro 11 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0438-17.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0438-17.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • developmental biology
  • medial entorhinal cortex
  • parvalbumin
  • synapse
  • ultrastructure

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Development

  • Absence of testes at puberty impacts functional development of nigrostriatal but not mesoaccumbal dopamine terminals in a wild-derived mouse
  • Anxiety-Associated Behaviors Following Ablation of Miro1 from Cortical Excitatory Neurons
  • Nicotinic Modulation of Fast-Spiking Neurons in Rat Somatosensory Cortex across Development
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.