Abstract
The chemical signal of light onset, a decrease in glutamate release from rod and cone photoreceptors, is processed by a postsynaptic G protein signaling cascade in ON-bipolar cells (BPCs). The metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR6, along with other cascade elements, is localized synaptically at the BPC dendritic tips. The effector ion channel protein transient receptor potential melastatin-1 (TRPM1), in contrast, is located not only at the dendritic tips but also in BPC bodies and axons. Little is known about the intracellular localization of TRPM1, or its trafficking route to the dendritic tip plasma membrane. Recombinant TRPM1 expressed in mammalian cells colocalized with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) markers, with little or none detected at the plasma membrane. In mouse retina, somatic TRPM1 was similarly intracellular, and not at the plasma membrane. Labeling of ER membranes by expression of a fluorescent marker showed that in BPCs the ER extends into axons and dendrites, but not dendritic tips. In cell bodies, TRPM1 colocalized with the ER, and not with the Golgi apparatus. Fluorescence protease protection (FPP) assays with TRPM1-GFP fusions in heterologous cells revealed that the N and C termini are both accessible to the cytoplasm, consistent with the transmembrane domain topology of related TRP channels. These results indicate that the majority of TRPM1 is present in the ER, from which it can potentially be transported to the dendritic tips as needed for ON light responses. The excess of ER-resident TRPM1 relative to the amount needed at the dendritic tips suggests a potential new function for TRPM1 in the ER.
Significance Statement
Retinal bipolar cells (BPCs) of the ON subtype detect signals from both rod and cone photoreceptors and are required for dim light vision. Little is known about the secretory pathway in these cells, or the trafficking of synaptic signal cascade proteins to their destination at the dendritic tip plasma membrane. The ion channel protein transient receptor potential melastatin-1 (TRPM1) is required for the depolarizing light response of ON-BPCs. However, in addition to its postsynaptic location at the BPC dendritic tips, TRPM1 is also present in cell bodies and axons. Our results show that somatic TRPM1 is intracellular and located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and not at the plasma membrane, suggesting that plasma membrane insertion occurs specifically at the dendrites or dendritic tips.
Introduction
At the synapses between photoreceptors and downstream bipolar cells (BPCs) in the retina, signals are divided into two channels: the ON channel, which responds to light onset, and the OFF channel, which responds to dark onset. Rod BPCs are all in the ON channel. In rod and cone ON-BPCs, glutamate released from photoreceptor terminals is detected by a metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling cascade. The glutamate receptor, mGluR6, signals via the heterotrimeric G protein Go, which in turn gates a transduction channel by an unknown mechanism (for review, see Martemyanov and Sampath, 2017). Transient receptor potential melastatin-1 (TRPM1) is required for channel function (Audo et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Morgans et al., 2009; Shen et al., 2009; Van Genderen et al., 2009; Koike et al., 2010b), but it is not known if it is sufficient for formation of the Go-sensitive channel (Lambert et al., 2011; Agosto et al., 2014; Schneider et al., 2015; Martemyanov and Sampath, 2017). In the dark, tonic release of glutamate activates mGluR6, keeping the channel closed; at light onset, decrease in glutamate release and deactivation of mGluR6 lead to channel opening and membrane depolarization.
Retinal BPC bodies reside in the distal part of the inner nuclear layer; dendrites extend into the outer plexiform layer, where the dendritic tips form synapses with photoreceptor terminals, and the axon extends into the inner plexiform layer, where it forms synapses with amacrine or ganglion cells (for review, see Dunn and Wong, 2014; Fig. 1A). Like other secondary neurons, retinal BPCs are highly polarized and maintain specialized postsynaptic machinery specifically in dendritic tips. Disruption or knock-out of other synaptic components, namely, mGluR6 (Cao et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012; Gregg et al., 2014), nyctalopin (NYX; Pearring et al., 2011; Gregg et al., 2014), LRIT3 (Neuillé et al., 2015), or ELFN1 (Cao et al., 2015), reduces or eliminates TRPM1 accumulation at the dendritic tips. However, localization of mGluR6 (Morgans et al., 2009; Koike et al., 2010b; Peachey et al., 2012a) and NYX (Pearring et al., 2011; Gregg et al., 2014) appear normal in TRPM1 knock-out mice, suggesting that these proteins do not require interaction with TRPM1 for trafficking. Consistent with this, a recent study of TRPM1 and mGluR6 during postnatal development found that mGluR6 appears at the dendritic tips earlier than TRPM1, and that these proteins are likely trafficked independently of each other (Anastassov et al., 2017). Despite these findings, protein trafficking in the BPC dendrites is still poorly understood, and little is known about the location of secretory pathway organelles in these cells.
Although the transduction channel activity of TRPM1 is likely restricted to the synapses at BPC dendritic tips, where other participants of the pathway are localized (Nomura et al., 1994; Masu et al., 1995; Morgans et al., 2006, 2007; Peachey et al., 2012b; Orlandi et al., 2013), more than half of TRPM1 is found in BPC bodies (Morgans et al., 2009; Koike et al., 2010b; Agosto et al., 2018; Fig. 1A). There have been some data suggesting that somatic TRPM1 is at least partially intracellular (Pearring et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012), but the subcellular localization is unknown, as is the location of plasma membrane insertion. In this study, we have shown that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in ON-BPCs extends into axons and dendrites, and that TRPM1 in cell bodies is intracellular and colocalized with the ER. In addition, we have confirmed that the intracellular topology of ER-resident TRPM1 conforms to that of the superfamily of ion channels to which it belongs.
Materials and Methods
Animals
WT C57BL/6 mice were obtained from the Baylor College of Medicine Center for Comparative Medicine, and WT CD-1 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (RRID: IMSR_CRL: 22). Nob3 mice (Grm6nob3; Maddox et al., 2008) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (RRID: IMSR_JAX: 016883). Absence of the Pde6brd1 allele was confirmed by genotyping as previously described (Giménez and Montoliu, 2001), and absence of the Crb1rd8 allele (Mattapallil et al., 2012) was confirmed by PCR amplifying and sequencing the surrounding region of genomic DNA. All immunofluorescence microscopy experiments were performed with WT C57BL/6 mice aged 4–12 weeks, except experiments involving subretinal injections, for which CD-1 mice were used as described below. Mice of either sex were used for all experiments. All procedures were approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee.
Cells
Human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells were obtained from the ATCC (#CRL-1573, RRID: CVCL_0045) and maintained in DMEM (Corning) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone or Sigma). For fluorescence protease protection (FPP) assays, HEK293 cells were a gift from Michael Xi Zhu (The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX). Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were maintained in Ham’s F12 Nutrient Mixture (HyClone), or DMEM/F12 50/50 (Corning), with 10% FBS.
Primary antibodies
Antibodies, concentrations used, and validation information are shown in Table 1. Generation of monoclonal antibodies with full-length mouse mGluR6 has been described, and clone 312 was used previously (and validated) for Western blotting (Agosto et al., 2018). In this study, we used clone 366, which, unlike clone 312, performs well in retina immunostaining; clone 366 is validated in Figure 4. TRPM1, mGluR6, and 1D4 antibodies were purified from hybridoma cultures as previously described (Agosto et al., 2014).
Expression constructs
Cloning of TRPM1 (isoform C, NP_001034193.2) and NYX (NP_775591.1) from mouse retina was previously described (Agosto et al., 2014, 2018). DsRed cDNA was obtained from pDsRed-monomer-C1 (Clontech). Constructs for transfection of HEK and CHO cells were all cloned in pCDNA3.1(+) using KpnI and NotI, and consisted of free GFP or DsRed; untagged TRPM1; TRPM1 with a C-terminal 1D4 tag or N-terminal HA tag; EGFP-TRPM1 and TRPM1-EGFP fusions containing linkers GGSGG and APVAT, respectively; EGFP-NYX with EGFP behind the signal sequence (NYX[1-19]-EGFP-GGGSGGG-NYX[20-476]); NYX-EGFP (NYX-GGGSGGG-EGFP); or dsRed-NYX (Nyx[1-19]-DsRed-Nyx[20-476]). An Emerald-Sec61β construct with CMV promoter (mEmerald-Sec61-C-18) was obtained from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid #54249). pGrm6P-Emerald-Sec61β was constructed by cloning Emerald-Sec61β into a plasmid containing the Grm6 promoter 200-bp critical region and SV40 enhancer (Kim et al., 2008), derived from Addgene plasmid #18817, a gift from Connie Cepko, by removing the GFP, IRES, and alkaline phosphatase portions of its sequence.
Subretinal injection and electroporation
DNA for injection was prepared using a Qiafilter Maxiprep kit (QIAGEN) and dissolved in water. Injections and electroporations were performed as previously described (Matsuda and Cepko, 2004, 2008). Briefly, left eyelids of CD-1 P0 mouse pups were opened with an incision along the future edge of the eyelid. Pilot holes were made in the sclera (postlimbus) with a 30-G needle, followed by positioning of a 33-G blunt injection needle into the subretinal space. Approximately 450 nl of pGrm6P-Emerald-Sec61β plasmid DNA (2.5-3 mg/ml) in PBS with 0.1% Fast Green dye were injected using a microinjector (UMP3 Microsyringe Injector and Micro4 Controller, World Precision Instruments) set at 130 nl/s. Five 50-ms pulses of 80 V, separated by 950-ms intervals, were applied across the eyes using custom tweezers with 7-mm diameter electrodes and an ECM 830 square wave electroporator (BTX Harvard Apparatus). Eyecup dissections were performed approximately four weeks later.
Retina immunostaining
Intact eyes from room-light-adapted animals were used. No obvious differences in TRPM1 localization were observed in light- and dark-adapted animals. Eyes were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for ∼45–60 min, washed extensively in PBS, then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PBS overnight at 4°C. The cornea and lens were removed, and eyecups were embedded in OCT; 8- to 20-μm cryostat sections were adhered to Superfrost Plus slides (VWR or Fisher) or coverslips coated with 100 μg/ml poly-D-lysine (PDL). Sections were postfixed in 2–4% PFA for 10 min, washed in PBS, and blocked for 2 h at room temperature (RT) in PBS with 10% donkey serum, 5% BSA, and 0.2% Triton X-100. Samples were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer, washed in PBS, then incubated at RT for 2 h with secondary antibodies (donkey anti-mouse-Alexa Fluor 488 and goat or donkey anti-mouse-Alexa Fluor 555, or goat anti-mouse-IgG2B-Alexa Fluor 555 and goat anti-mouse-IgG1-Alexa Fluor 488; Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher) diluted to 8 μg/ml in blocking buffer, then washed in PBS and mounted with Prolong Gold (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher).
For super-resolution stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), #1.5 square coverslips were acid washed, then coated with 100 μg/ml PDL for 1 h, washed in water, and air dried. 8-μm cryostat sections were adhered to the coverslips, which were then glued with epoxy to the bottom (outside) of 35-mm hole-bottom dishes. Immunostaining was performed as described above, except that secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse[F(ab’)2]-Alexa Fluor 647 and goat-anti-rabbit[F(ab’)2]-Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher). Before imaging, labeled sections were covered with imaging buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 8) 10 mM NaCl, 0.56 mg/ml glucose oxidase (Sigma), 34 μg/ml catalase (Roche or Sigma), 10% (w/v) glucose, 15 mM cysteamine hydrochloride, and 10% VECTASHIELD H-1000 (Vector Laboratories); Dempsey et al., 2011] and a second coverslip sealed with epoxy. The VECTASHIELD in the imaging buffer enables the photoswitching behavior of Alexa Fluor 555 (Olivier et al., 2013).
Retina dissociation and immunostaining
Three mice were used for each experiment. Retinas were dissected in dissection/dissociation buffer [DD; 97.5% Hanks’ balanced salt solution, 0.11 mg/ml sodium pyruvate, 0.1% (w/v) glucose, 9.8 mM HEPES pH 7.3; Beaudoin et al., 2012] and washed three times in DD. Retinas were then suspended in 1 ml DMEM with 2 mg/ml freshly-added papain (Worthington) and incubated with the lid open in a 37°C 5% CO2 incubator for 30 min. The papain was inactivated by washing twice with 1 ml DMEM + 10% FBS. Cells in 1 ml fresh DMEM + 10% FBS were then dissociated by sharply tapping the tube ∼10 times on a hard surface (Berntson et al., 2003). Large debris were allowed to settle, and 150 μl of the supernatant were spread onto Superfrost Plus slides with a wide-orifice pipet tip, then allowed to adhere for 15 min at RT. 150 μl of 4% PFA in PBS was added directly to the cells, and incubated for an additional 15 min, then slides were washed in PBS and immunostained as described below for cultured cells.
Cell transfection and immunostaining
Cells in 24-well plates were transfected with 0.1 μg mEmerald-Sec61-C-18 and 0.5-0.7 μg pCDNA3.1-TRPM1 plasmid DNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The next day, cells were briefly trypsinized and replated on PDL-coated (HEK cells) or uncoated (CHO cells) coverslips. At ∼48 h post-transfection, cells were fixed with 2% PFA in PBS for 10 min, washed in PBS, blocked/permeabilized with PBS + 1% BSA + 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBSAT) for 15 min, labeled with primary antibody in PBSAT for 45–60 min, followed by secondary antibodies 2–4 μg/ml in PBSAT for 30 min. For some experiments, CHO cells were transfected on coverslips, and labeled after ∼24 h without replating. Coverslips were mounted with Prolong Gold.
Confocal microscopy and image processing
Images were acquired with a TCS-SP5 laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica) using a 63× oil immersion objective (Leica, HC PL APO CS2 63.0×, numerical aperture 1.40). Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 488 were detected in sequential mode with a 543 nm HeNe laser and 488 nm argon laser, respectively, with imaging parameters set to avoid cross-talk between the channels. Images were acquired with few or no saturated pixels. For figures, images were processed in ImageJ (NIH) and/or Photoshop (Adobe) to apply pseudocolors and adjust the minimum and maximum input levels, maintaining a linear slope. All images are single optical sections unless indicated as projections.
Line scans were determined from raw images in ImageJ using 1 px-wide lines and the “plot profile” tool. Cropped raw images of axons were straightened in ImageJ using 30 px-wide segmented lines and the “straighten” tool, and column average line scans were measured using the straightened axon image and plot profile. Profiles are shown normalized to the maximum intensity.
STORM imaging and data analysis
Images were acquired with a Nikon N-STORM system, with a 100× oil immersion TIRF objective (CFI Apo TIRF, numerical aperture 1.49). 561 nm and 647 nm solid-state lasers were used at maximum power to induce photoswitching of Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 647, respectively, without the use of an activator fluorophore (Bock et al., 2007; Heilemann et al., 2008); 512 × 512 px fields (160 nm/px) were imaged with an Andor iXON DU 897 EMCCD camera and a quad cube filter (Chroma, zt405/488/561/640 m-TRF); 20,000–50,000 18-ms exposure frames (∼56 frames/s) were acquired for each channel, with alternating sequential activation. A cylindrical lens typically used for 3D-STORM was used, although data analysis was confined to 2D (see below). X-Y warp calibration was employed to correct chromatic aberration between channels. 2D-STORM reconstructions were performed with Nikon NIS Elements Ar Analysis software as previously described (Robichaux et al., 2017), except using minimum and maximum photon counts of 200–500 and 10,000, respectively. After reconstruction, density filters were applied to remove background events.
Western blotting
Preparation of total retina lysate and Western blotting were as previously described (Agosto et al., 2018). Blots were incubated overnight with BiP antibody (Table 1), 1 μg/ml, then with horseradish-peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit (Jackson ImmunoResearch), 0.16 μg/ml, followed by HyGLO (Denville Scientific) or SuperSignal West Pico (Thermo) chemiluminescent substrate, and exposed to film.
FPP assay
HEK293 cells in 24-well plates were transfected with 0.4 μg EGFP-NYX or NYX-EGFP, or 0.6 μg EGFP-TRPM1 or TRPM1-EGFP, along with 0.2-0.4 μg dsRed; or 0.2 μg GFP and 0.4 μg dsRed-NYX; or 0.4 μg dsRed-NYX and 0.4 μg NYX-EGFP, using Lipofectamine 2000. The next day, cells were briefly trypsinized and replated in eight-well Lab-Tek II chambered coverglasses which had previously been coated with 100 μg/ml PDL. Assays were performed at RT, ∼48–52 h post-transfection. Immediately before imaging, wells were washed three times with RT KHM buffer (110 mM potassium acetate, 2 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM HEPES; pH 7.2) and left in 200 μl KHM for the assay. Digitonin (5% solution from Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher) was heated to 95°C to dissolve and diluted in KHM immediately before use. UltraClean Proteinase K (20 mg/ml, Mo Bio) was diluted in KHM immediately before use. Images were acquired with the TCS-SP5 laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica) using the 63× oil immersion objective described above, set to scan every 30 s. Following the 1-min scan, 200 μl of 200 μM digitonin was added to the well. Following the 2-min scan, 400 μl of KHM (no protease control) or 100 μg/ml proteinase K was added to the well. In most experiments, fields containing many cells (512 × 512 px, 481.5 nm/px) were imaged, and individual cells were boxed for data analysis. In some experiments, higher-magnification fields containing one to two cells (256 × 256 px, 120.6 nm/px) were imaged. In both cases, the duration of each scan was ∼10 s. Relative fluorescence F at each time point t was calculated as 100·(Fcell,t – Fbgd,t0)/(Fcell,t0 – Fbgd,t0), where Fbgd,t0 was determined from an area in the first frame containing no cells. Cells in which fluorescence of free dsRed or GFP did not decrease after addition of digitonin, indicating poor permeabilization, were omitted.
Experimental design and statistical analysis
Microscopy images are representative examples of images from at least two independent experiments. For FPP assays, results from multiple wells from at least three independent experiments were combined.
Results
TRPM1 in ON-BPC bodies and axons is intracellular
To examine the location of TRPM1 in ON-BPC bodies, mouse retina sections were labeled with an antibody for TRPM1 that was previously validated with Trpm1 knock-out mice (Agosto et al., 2014, 2018), and antibodies for Na+/K+ ATPase, a marker for plasma membranes, or PKCα, a soluble cytoplasmic protein well characterized as a marker for rod BPCs. In cell bodies, there was little or no colocalization of TRPM1 with Na+/K+ ATPase, with TRPM1 appearing to be mostly intracellular (Fig. 1B). Labeling intensity was measured along lines drawn through the boundaries between cells; in most cases, the peak TRPM1 staining was noncoincident with the peak Na+/K+ ATPase staining (Fig. 1B). To more clearly resolve the TRPM1 location in cell bodies, we employed STORM (Rust et al., 2006; Dempsey et al., 2011). STORM reconstructions of retina sections labeled with TRPM1 and Na+/K+ ATPase antibodies clearly show non-overlapping staining in the cell bodies (Fig. 1C).
Furthermore, if TRPM1 were localized to the plasma membrane, staining would be expected to be peripheral to PKCα. However, TRPM1 staining was mostly internal relative to PKCα in cell bodies (Fig. 1D). These results indicate that the majority of TRPM1 in cell bodies is located in intracellular membranes, and not in the plasma membrane. Column average intensity profiles of straightened axon segments show that TRPM1 labeling is mostly internal relative to both Na+/K+ ATPase (Fig. 2A) and PKCα (Fig. 2B) in axons as well.
Heterologously expressed TRPM1 colocalizes with the ER
To determine the intracellular localization of TRPM1, we first examined the localization of heterologously-expressed protein. In both HEK293 and CHO cells transiently cotransfected with TRPM1 and Emerald-Sec61β, an ER membrane marker (Huang et al., 2016; Rapoport et al., 2017), extensive colocalization was observed throughout the ER network (Fig. 3A,B). TRPM1 staining also colocalized with antibody staining for endogenous binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP; Fig. 3C), which resides in the ER lumen and is involved in protein folding (Rapoport et al., 2017).
ER in ON-BPCs extends into axons and dendrites, but not dendritic tips
Little is known about the location of secretory pathway organelles, including the ER, in ON-BPCs. Immunostaining ER markers is challenging, because most cells have an extensive ER network and staining appears throughout the retina (Johnson et al., 2007; also see Fig. 5B), giving rise to extensive background signal from neighboring cells. Therefore, subretinal injection and electroporation of Emerald-Sec61β under control of the mGluR6 promoter (Matsuda and Cepko, 2004; Kim et al., 2008; Lagali et al., 2008; Van Wyk et al., 2015) were employed to specifically and sparsely label ON-BPCs with an ER marker (Fig. 4). Z-stack projections show Emerald-Sec61β localization throughout the cell bodies, dendrites, and axons of transduced cells (Fig. 4A). Even in cells with relatively weak expression of Emerald-Sec61β, signal is present in axons and dendrites (Fig. 4A, left), indicating the presence of ER in those compartments. Lacy structures characteristic of the ER network can be seen in higher-magnification images (Fig. 4B), and Emerald-Sec61β largely colocalized with the endogenous ER protein BiP (Fig. 5D). Labeling sections with PKCα antibody showed that as with TRPM1, Emerald-Sec61β in cell bodies is internal to PKCα (Fig. 4C).
To examine dendritic tips, we generated a monoclonal antibody against full-length mGluR6. This antibody labels dendritic tips as expected, and labeling is absent in Grm6 nob3 retina, which does not express mGluR6 protein (Maddox et al., 2008), demonstrating the specificity of the antibody (Fig. 4D). Labeling sections from injected retinas with mGluR6 antibody revealed no colocalization between Sec61β and mGluR6, indicating that the ER in dendrites does not extend into the dendritic tips (Fig. 4E). This is in contrast to PKCα, which can be seen clearly in the dendritic tip puncta (Fig. 1D, arrowheads).
TRPM1 colocalizes with the ER in ON-BPC bodies
Sections from Emerald-Sec61β-injected retinas labeled with TRPM1 antibody show that in the cell bodies, TRPM1 largely colocalizes with the ER (Fig. 5A). In some cases, TRPM1 and Emerald-Sec61β also appear to colocalize in the dendritic shafts (Fig. 5A, arrowheads), although detection of TRPM1 in dendritic shafts is not reliable. To corroborate the ER localization of TRPM1, we costained retina sections with antibody for the ER lumen protein BiP (Fig. 5B). Validation of this antibody is shown in Figure 5C–E. The limited validation data for ER marker antibodies in retina tissue, as well as the fact that much of the ER labeling originates from other cell types not expressing TRPM1, makes the staining patterns difficult to interpret. However, in ON-BPC bodies there is at least partial colocalization of BiP with TRPM1, consistent with the the results from Emerald-Sec61β-injected retinas. There is no clear evidence of ER labeling in the ON-BPC dendritic tips, consistent with the absence of Emerald-Sec61β in the tips (Fig. 4E). Since interpreting immunostaining of ON-BPCs in retina sections may be complicated by the presence of other cell types, we also examined isolated ON-BPCs in acutely dissociated retina preparations (Fig. 6). Costaining with Na+/K+ ATPase confirmed largely intracellular somatic TRPM1 (Fig. 6A), which was partially colocalized with endogenous BiP (Fig. 6B), consistent with our previous observations.
Golgi localization in ON-BPCs
Immunostaining retina sections for the cis-Golgi marker GM130 (Nakamura et al., 1995) revealed filamentous or tubular structures throughout the inner nuclear layer, presumably present in various cell types (Fig. 7A); in ON-BPCs, GM130 appears to be detected mainly in the distal cell body and dendritic trunk region (Fig. 7B). The location of GM130 in ON-BPCs was confirmed in the absence of other cell types by immunostaining acutely dissociated retinal cells (Fig. 7C). There was no colocalization with TRPM1 (Fig. 7B).
G protein subunits poorly colocalize with TRPM1
Heterotrimeric G protein subunits Gαo, Gβ3, and Gγ13 participate in the postsynaptic mGluR6 cascade in ON-BPCs (Dhingra et al., 2000, 2002, 2012; Huang et al., 2003; Ramakrishnan et al., 2015), and both Gα and Gβγ have been implicated in directly regulating TRPM1 (Koike et al., 2010a, 2010b; Shen et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2016). Although all three subunits are present in ON-BPC bodies and dendrites, there appears to be little colocalization with TRPM1 (Fig. 8) except in the dendritic tips, where Gαo is present (Fig. 8A, arrowheads). Gβ3 and Gγ13 immunostaining was not sufficiently clear to confidently visualize them in the dendritic tips (Fig. 8B,C, arrowheads).
TRPM1 N and C termini are cytoplasmic
Limited sequence similarity between the transmembrane (TM) domain of TRPM1 and those of other TRP family channels suggests that TRPM1 has six TM helices (Agosto et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2017). However, no experimental data regarding the topology of the protein have been reported, and different TM prediction algorithms yield varying results. A FPP assay (Lorenz et al., 2006; Tie et al., 2012; Nixon et al., 2013), in conjunction with live cell imaging, was used to assess the membrane topology of TRPM1 and NYX (Fig. 9). HEK293 cells expressing GFP fusion proteins were treated with the detergent digitonin to permeabilize the plasma membrane selectively without disrupting the ER, followed by proteinase K treatment to digest regions accessible to the cytoplasm. If the terminus fused to GFP is in the cytoplasm, it should be rapidly digested, measured as a decrease in fluorescence, whereas if the terminus is in the ER lumen, it should be protected from digestion. Mouse NYX, which is known to have an extracellular or ER-luminal N terminus and a cytoplasmic C terminus (Bojang and Gregg, 2012), was used as a control. As expected, the fluorescence of cells expressing NYX-GFP decreased rapidly on addition of protease, while that of cells expressing GFP-NYX or dsRed-NYX was resistant for several minutes. The fluorescence of cells expressing TRPM1 with GFP at either the N or the C terminus was sensitive to protease treatment, indicating cytoplasmic accessibility of both termini, consistent with an even number of transmembrane segments, almost certainly six, as found in TRP channels with known structures.
Discussion
Our results demonstrate that TRPM1 in ON-BPC bodies is intracellular and located predominantly in the ER, and not the plasma membrane or Golgi apparatus (Figs. 1, 2, 5–7). This intracellular localization suggests that TRPM1 is inserted at the plasma membrane either in the dendrites or at the dendritic tips where it is concentrated. The subcellular localization of TRPM1 in dendritic shafts could not be determined, as TRPM1 signal is very poorly detected in dendrites, except at the dendritic tips. However, one hypothesis is that TRPM1 is trafficked all the way to the dendritic tips in the secretory pathway, where forward trafficking and/or plasma membrane insertion is triggered by a signal from a synapse-specific component. This hypothesis is consistent with the observations that knocking out other synaptic components reduces TRPM1 dendritic tip localization (Cao et al., 2011, 2015; Pearring et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012; Gregg et al., 2014; Neuillé et al., 2015), if a correctly-formed synaptic complex is a prerequisite for TRPM1 plasma membrane insertion.
In other types of neurons, dendrites contain ER network, ER to Golgi intermediate compartments, and sometimes Golgi outposts. Synaptic proteins are trafficked by diverse secretory routes (for review, see Kennedy and Ehlers, 2006; Ramírez and Couve, 2011; Valenzuela and Perez, 2015) including long-haul transport or diffusion within dendritic ER (Cui-Wang et al., 2012; Valenzuela et al., 2014) and Golgi-independent secretory trafficking (Bowen et al., 2017). Secretory pathways in retinal BPCs are still relatively unexplored. We show that the exogenously-expressed ER protein Sec61β is present in somas, axons, and dendrites (Fig. 4), indicating that, as in other neurons, the ER network in retinal BPCs extends into axons and dendrites. The two ER markers employed, endogenous BiP and electroporated Sec61β, appear to have overlapping but nonidentical distributions, likely reflecting the heterogeneous nature of the ER. The widespread localization of TRPM1 in somas and axons (Figs. 1, 2) suggests that it may diffuse freely in a continuous ER network membrane. The identities of organelles participating in post-ER trafficking, and the signals that direct plasma membrane insertion, are unknown.
Also mysterious is the large ER pool of TRPM1. It may reflect merely an excess of trafficking or assembly intermediates; it would not be surprising to find biosynthetic intermediates of membrane proteins in the ER. On the other hand, the distribution of TRPM1 is notably different from other transmembrane participants in the synaptic signaling pathway, with more than half found in the cell bodies (Agosto et al., 2018). An alternative explanation is that TRPM1 may have a distinct function in the ER membrane. In melanocytes, functional roles for intracellular TRPM1 in melanin synthesis and calcium homeostasis have been reported (Oancea et al., 2009; Devi et al., 2009, 2013). The related TRPM channels TRPM2 (Lange et al., 2009; Manna et al., 2015) and TRPM8 (Bidaux et al., 2015) have also been shown to have intracellular functions. Like TRPM1, the heterotrimeric G protein subunits mediating synaptic transduction reside partially in cell bodies. However, no obvious colocalization was observed with somatic TRPM1 (Fig. 8), suggesting that if ER-resident TRPM1 does have a function, it may not depend on Gαo, Gβ3, or Gγ13.
TRPM1 is present in both rod and cone ON-BPC bodies (Fig. 1D, asterisks). Although the localization appears similar in all ON-BPCs costained with plasma membrane or ER markers, we did not specifically differentiate rod and cone BPCs. It is possible that these cells employ different routes and/or regulation of TRPM1 secretory trafficking or support different functions for intracellular TRPM1.
No trafficking signals have been identified yet in TRPM1. Cytoplasmic ER retention signals have been identified in numerous channel subunits including NMDA receptors (Standley et al., 2000; Scott et al., 2001, 2003), ATP-sensitive K+ channels (Zerangue et al., 1999), voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (Bichet et al., 2000), voltage-gated Na+ channels (Zhang et al., 2008), and TRP channels (Köttgen et al., 2005). Topology analysis (Fig. 9) showed both N and C termini of TRPM1 are in the cytoplasm, as expected from structures of other TRP channels (Liao et al., 2013; Paulsen et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2017; Winkler et al., 2017; Autzen et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2018), and it is likely that one or both of the cytoplasmic arms contains sequences that direct and regulate forward trafficking. Deciphering sequence determinants of TRPM1 trafficking and its route to the dendritic tip plasma membrane will be important for understanding the maintenance of functional synapses in ON-BPCs.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants R01-EY007981/EY007981-S1, R01-EY025218, and R01-EY026545 (to T.G.W.), F32-EY020067 (to M.A.A.), F32-EY024815 (to I.A.A.), and F32-EY027171 (to M.A.R.); by a Knights Templar Eye Foundation Pediatric Ophthalmology Career-Starter Grant (to M.A.A.); by the Welch Foundation Grant Q0035; and by the Monoclonal Antibody/Recombinant Protein Expression Shared Resource at Baylor College of Medicine with funding from NIH Cancer Center Support Grant P30-CA125123.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.