Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

A Large Endoplasmic Reticulum-Resident Pool of TRPM1 in Retinal ON-Bipolar Cells

Melina A. Agosto, Ivan A. Anastassov, Michael A. Robichaux and Theodore G. Wensel
eNeuro 15 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0143-18.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0143-18.2018
Melina A. Agosto
1Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Melina A. Agosto
Ivan A. Anastassov
1Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Robichaux
1Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theodore G. Wensel
1Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The chemical signal of light onset, a decrease in glutamate release from rod and cone photoreceptors, is processed by a postsynaptic G protein signaling cascade in ON-bipolar cells (BPCs). The metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR6, along with other cascade elements, is localized synaptically at the BPC dendritic tips. The effector ion channel protein transient receptor potential melastatin-1 (TRPM1), in contrast, is located not only at the dendritic tips but also in BPC bodies and axons. Little is known about the intracellular localization of TRPM1, or its trafficking route to the dendritic tip plasma membrane. Recombinant TRPM1 expressed in mammalian cells colocalized with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) markers, with little or none detected at the plasma membrane. In mouse retina, somatic TRPM1 was similarly intracellular, and not at the plasma membrane. Labeling of ER membranes by expression of a fluorescent marker showed that in BPCs the ER extends into axons and dendrites, but not dendritic tips. In cell bodies, TRPM1 colocalized with the ER, and not with the Golgi apparatus. Fluorescence protease protection (FPP) assays with TRPM1-GFP fusions in heterologous cells revealed that the N and C termini are both accessible to the cytoplasm, consistent with the transmembrane domain topology of related TRP channels. These results indicate that the majority of TRPM1 is present in the ER, from which it can potentially be transported to the dendritic tips as needed for ON light responses. The excess of ER-resident TRPM1 relative to the amount needed at the dendritic tips suggests a potential new function for TRPM1 in the ER.

  • bipolar cell
  • protein trafficking
  • secretory pathway
  • TRPM1

Significance Statement

Retinal bipolar cells (BPCs) of the ON subtype detect signals from both rod and cone photoreceptors and are required for dim light vision. Little is known about the secretory pathway in these cells, or the trafficking of synaptic signal cascade proteins to their destination at the dendritic tip plasma membrane. The ion channel protein transient receptor potential melastatin-1 (TRPM1) is required for the depolarizing light response of ON-BPCs. However, in addition to its postsynaptic location at the BPC dendritic tips, TRPM1 is also present in cell bodies and axons. Our results show that somatic TRPM1 is intracellular and located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and not at the plasma membrane, suggesting that plasma membrane insertion occurs specifically at the dendrites or dendritic tips.

Introduction

At the synapses between photoreceptors and downstream bipolar cells (BPCs) in the retina, signals are divided into two channels: the ON channel, which responds to light onset, and the OFF channel, which responds to dark onset. Rod BPCs are all in the ON channel. In rod and cone ON-BPCs, glutamate released from photoreceptor terminals is detected by a metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling cascade. The glutamate receptor, mGluR6, signals via the heterotrimeric G protein Go, which in turn gates a transduction channel by an unknown mechanism (for review, see Martemyanov and Sampath, 2017). Transient receptor potential melastatin-1 (TRPM1) is required for channel function (Audo et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Morgans et al., 2009; Shen et al., 2009; Van Genderen et al., 2009; Koike et al., 2010b), but it is not known if it is sufficient for formation of the Go-sensitive channel (Lambert et al., 2011; Agosto et al., 2014; Schneider et al., 2015; Martemyanov and Sampath, 2017). In the dark, tonic release of glutamate activates mGluR6, keeping the channel closed; at light onset, decrease in glutamate release and deactivation of mGluR6 lead to channel opening and membrane depolarization.

Retinal BPC bodies reside in the distal part of the inner nuclear layer; dendrites extend into the outer plexiform layer, where the dendritic tips form synapses with photoreceptor terminals, and the axon extends into the inner plexiform layer, where it forms synapses with amacrine or ganglion cells (for review, see Dunn and Wong, 2014; Fig. 1A). Like other secondary neurons, retinal BPCs are highly polarized and maintain specialized postsynaptic machinery specifically in dendritic tips. Disruption or knock-out of other synaptic components, namely, mGluR6 (Cao et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012; Gregg et al., 2014), nyctalopin (NYX; Pearring et al., 2011; Gregg et al., 2014), LRIT3 (Neuillé et al., 2015), or ELFN1 (Cao et al., 2015), reduces or eliminates TRPM1 accumulation at the dendritic tips. However, localization of mGluR6 (Morgans et al., 2009; Koike et al., 2010b; Peachey et al., 2012a) and NYX (Pearring et al., 2011; Gregg et al., 2014) appear normal in TRPM1 knock-out mice, suggesting that these proteins do not require interaction with TRPM1 for trafficking. Consistent with this, a recent study of TRPM1 and mGluR6 during postnatal development found that mGluR6 appears at the dendritic tips earlier than TRPM1, and that these proteins are likely trafficked independently of each other (Anastassov et al., 2017). Despite these findings, protein trafficking in the BPC dendrites is still poorly understood, and little is known about the location of secretory pathway organelles in these cells.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

TRPM1 is intracellular in ON-BPC bodies. A, Diagram of rod photoreceptors synapsing onto a rod BPC, alongside TRPM1 immunostaining (green) of a mouse retina section. OS, outer segments; IS, inner segments; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. B, Retina sections were immunostained with antibodies for TRPM1 (green) and the plasma membrane marker Na+/K+ ATPase (magenta). Intensity profiles were measured along lines indicated by the arrows on the merged image and are shown normalized to the maximum height. C, STORM reconstructions of retina sections immunostained for TRPM1 (magenta) and Na+/K+ ATPase (green). Boxes show the regions magnified on the right. D, Retina sections immunostained for TRPM1 (green) and cytoplasmic protein PKCα (magenta). TRPM1 staining is also present in PKCα-negative cone BPC bodies (asterisks). Magnified images are shown on the bottom, with arrowheads indicating dendritic tips.

Although the transduction channel activity of TRPM1 is likely restricted to the synapses at BPC dendritic tips, where other participants of the pathway are localized (Nomura et al., 1994; Masu et al., 1995; Morgans et al., 2006, 2007; Peachey et al., 2012b; Orlandi et al., 2013), more than half of TRPM1 is found in BPC bodies (Morgans et al., 2009; Koike et al., 2010b; Agosto et al., 2018; Fig. 1A). There have been some data suggesting that somatic TRPM1 is at least partially intracellular (Pearring et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012), but the subcellular localization is unknown, as is the location of plasma membrane insertion. In this study, we have shown that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in ON-BPCs extends into axons and dendrites, and that TRPM1 in cell bodies is intracellular and colocalized with the ER. In addition, we have confirmed that the intracellular topology of ER-resident TRPM1 conforms to that of the superfamily of ion channels to which it belongs.

Materials and Methods

Animals

WT C57BL/6 mice were obtained from the Baylor College of Medicine Center for Comparative Medicine, and WT CD-1 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (RRID: IMSR_CRL: 22). Nob3 mice (Grm6nob3; Maddox et al., 2008) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (RRID: IMSR_JAX: 016883). Absence of the Pde6brd1 allele was confirmed by genotyping as previously described (Giménez and Montoliu, 2001), and absence of the Crb1rd8 allele (Mattapallil et al., 2012) was confirmed by PCR amplifying and sequencing the surrounding region of genomic DNA. All immunofluorescence microscopy experiments were performed with WT C57BL/6 mice aged 4–12 weeks, except experiments involving subretinal injections, for which CD-1 mice were used as described below. Mice of either sex were used for all experiments. All procedures were approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee.

Cells

Human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells were obtained from the ATCC (#CRL-1573, RRID: CVCL_0045) and maintained in DMEM (Corning) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone or Sigma). For fluorescence protease protection (FPP) assays, HEK293 cells were a gift from Michael Xi Zhu (The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX). Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were maintained in Ham’s F12 Nutrient Mixture (HyClone), or DMEM/F12 50/50 (Corning), with 10% FBS.

Primary antibodies

Antibodies, concentrations used, and validation information are shown in Table 1. Generation of monoclonal antibodies with full-length mouse mGluR6 has been described, and clone 312 was used previously (and validated) for Western blotting (Agosto et al., 2018). In this study, we used clone 366, which, unlike clone 312, performs well in retina immunostaining; clone 366 is validated in Figure 4. TRPM1, mGluR6, and 1D4 antibodies were purified from hybridoma cultures as previously described (Agosto et al., 2014).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Primary antibody sources, concentrations used, and validation information

Expression constructs

Cloning of TRPM1 (isoform C, NP_001034193.2) and NYX (NP_775591.1) from mouse retina was previously described (Agosto et al., 2014, 2018). DsRed cDNA was obtained from pDsRed-monomer-C1 (Clontech). Constructs for transfection of HEK and CHO cells were all cloned in pCDNA3.1(+) using KpnI and NotI, and consisted of free GFP or DsRed; untagged TRPM1; TRPM1 with a C-terminal 1D4 tag or N-terminal HA tag; EGFP-TRPM1 and TRPM1-EGFP fusions containing linkers GGSGG and APVAT, respectively; EGFP-NYX with EGFP behind the signal sequence (NYX[1-19]-EGFP-GGGSGGG-NYX[20-476]); NYX-EGFP (NYX-GGGSGGG-EGFP); or dsRed-NYX (Nyx[1-19]-DsRed-Nyx[20-476]). An Emerald-Sec61β construct with CMV promoter (mEmerald-Sec61-C-18) was obtained from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid #54249). pGrm6P-Emerald-Sec61β was constructed by cloning Emerald-Sec61β into a plasmid containing the Grm6 promoter 200-bp critical region and SV40 enhancer (Kim et al., 2008), derived from Addgene plasmid #18817, a gift from Connie Cepko, by removing the GFP, IRES, and alkaline phosphatase portions of its sequence.

Subretinal injection and electroporation

DNA for injection was prepared using a Qiafilter Maxiprep kit (QIAGEN) and dissolved in water. Injections and electroporations were performed as previously described (Matsuda and Cepko, 2004, 2008). Briefly, left eyelids of CD-1 P0 mouse pups were opened with an incision along the future edge of the eyelid. Pilot holes were made in the sclera (postlimbus) with a 30-G needle, followed by positioning of a 33-G blunt injection needle into the subretinal space. Approximately 450 nl of pGrm6P-Emerald-Sec61β plasmid DNA (2.5-3 mg/ml) in PBS with 0.1% Fast Green dye were injected using a microinjector (UMP3 Microsyringe Injector and Micro4 Controller, World Precision Instruments) set at 130 nl/s. Five 50-ms pulses of 80 V, separated by 950-ms intervals, were applied across the eyes using custom tweezers with 7-mm diameter electrodes and an ECM 830 square wave electroporator (BTX Harvard Apparatus). Eyecup dissections were performed approximately four weeks later.

Retina immunostaining

Intact eyes from room-light-adapted animals were used. No obvious differences in TRPM1 localization were observed in light- and dark-adapted animals. Eyes were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for ∼45–60 min, washed extensively in PBS, then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PBS overnight at 4°C. The cornea and lens were removed, and eyecups were embedded in OCT; 8- to 20-μm cryostat sections were adhered to Superfrost Plus slides (VWR or Fisher) or coverslips coated with 100 μg/ml poly-D-lysine (PDL). Sections were postfixed in 2–4% PFA for 10 min, washed in PBS, and blocked for 2 h at room temperature (RT) in PBS with 10% donkey serum, 5% BSA, and 0.2% Triton X-100. Samples were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer, washed in PBS, then incubated at RT for 2 h with secondary antibodies (donkey anti-mouse-Alexa Fluor 488 and goat or donkey anti-mouse-Alexa Fluor 555, or goat anti-mouse-IgG2B-Alexa Fluor 555 and goat anti-mouse-IgG1-Alexa Fluor 488; Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher) diluted to 8 μg/ml in blocking buffer, then washed in PBS and mounted with Prolong Gold (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher).

For super-resolution stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), #1.5 square coverslips were acid washed, then coated with 100 μg/ml PDL for 1 h, washed in water, and air dried. 8-μm cryostat sections were adhered to the coverslips, which were then glued with epoxy to the bottom (outside) of 35-mm hole-bottom dishes. Immunostaining was performed as described above, except that secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse[F(ab’)2]-Alexa Fluor 647 and goat-anti-rabbit[F(ab’)2]-Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher). Before imaging, labeled sections were covered with imaging buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 8) 10 mM NaCl, 0.56 mg/ml glucose oxidase (Sigma), 34 μg/ml catalase (Roche or Sigma), 10% (w/v) glucose, 15 mM cysteamine hydrochloride, and 10% VECTASHIELD H-1000 (Vector Laboratories); Dempsey et al., 2011] and a second coverslip sealed with epoxy. The VECTASHIELD in the imaging buffer enables the photoswitching behavior of Alexa Fluor 555 (Olivier et al., 2013).

Retina dissociation and immunostaining

Three mice were used for each experiment. Retinas were dissected in dissection/dissociation buffer [DD; 97.5% Hanks’ balanced salt solution, 0.11 mg/ml sodium pyruvate, 0.1% (w/v) glucose, 9.8 mM HEPES pH 7.3; Beaudoin et al., 2012] and washed three times in DD. Retinas were then suspended in 1 ml DMEM with 2 mg/ml freshly-added papain (Worthington) and incubated with the lid open in a 37°C 5% CO2 incubator for 30 min. The papain was inactivated by washing twice with 1 ml DMEM + 10% FBS. Cells in 1 ml fresh DMEM + 10% FBS were then dissociated by sharply tapping the tube ∼10 times on a hard surface (Berntson et al., 2003). Large debris were allowed to settle, and 150 μl of the supernatant were spread onto Superfrost Plus slides with a wide-orifice pipet tip, then allowed to adhere for 15 min at RT. 150 μl of 4% PFA in PBS was added directly to the cells, and incubated for an additional 15 min, then slides were washed in PBS and immunostained as described below for cultured cells.

Cell transfection and immunostaining

Cells in 24-well plates were transfected with 0.1 μg mEmerald-Sec61-C-18 and 0.5-0.7 μg pCDNA3.1-TRPM1 plasmid DNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The next day, cells were briefly trypsinized and replated on PDL-coated (HEK cells) or uncoated (CHO cells) coverslips. At ∼48 h post-transfection, cells were fixed with 2% PFA in PBS for 10 min, washed in PBS, blocked/permeabilized with PBS + 1% BSA + 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBSAT) for 15 min, labeled with primary antibody in PBSAT for 45–60 min, followed by secondary antibodies 2–4 μg/ml in PBSAT for 30 min. For some experiments, CHO cells were transfected on coverslips, and labeled after ∼24 h without replating. Coverslips were mounted with Prolong Gold.

Confocal microscopy and image processing

Images were acquired with a TCS-SP5 laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica) using a 63× oil immersion objective (Leica, HC PL APO CS2 63.0×, numerical aperture 1.40). Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 488 were detected in sequential mode with a 543 nm HeNe laser and 488 nm argon laser, respectively, with imaging parameters set to avoid cross-talk between the channels. Images were acquired with few or no saturated pixels. For figures, images were processed in ImageJ (NIH) and/or Photoshop (Adobe) to apply pseudocolors and adjust the minimum and maximum input levels, maintaining a linear slope. All images are single optical sections unless indicated as projections.

Line scans were determined from raw images in ImageJ using 1 px-wide lines and the “plot profile” tool. Cropped raw images of axons were straightened in ImageJ using 30 px-wide segmented lines and the “straighten” tool, and column average line scans were measured using the straightened axon image and plot profile. Profiles are shown normalized to the maximum intensity.

STORM imaging and data analysis

Images were acquired with a Nikon N-STORM system, with a 100× oil immersion TIRF objective (CFI Apo TIRF, numerical aperture 1.49). 561 nm and 647 nm solid-state lasers were used at maximum power to induce photoswitching of Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 647, respectively, without the use of an activator fluorophore (Bock et al., 2007; Heilemann et al., 2008); 512 × 512 px fields (160 nm/px) were imaged with an Andor iXON DU 897 EMCCD camera and a quad cube filter (Chroma, zt405/488/561/640 m-TRF); 20,000–50,000 18-ms exposure frames (∼56 frames/s) were acquired for each channel, with alternating sequential activation. A cylindrical lens typically used for 3D-STORM was used, although data analysis was confined to 2D (see below). X-Y warp calibration was employed to correct chromatic aberration between channels. 2D-STORM reconstructions were performed with Nikon NIS Elements Ar Analysis software as previously described (Robichaux et al., 2017), except using minimum and maximum photon counts of 200–500 and 10,000, respectively. After reconstruction, density filters were applied to remove background events.

Western blotting

Preparation of total retina lysate and Western blotting were as previously described (Agosto et al., 2018). Blots were incubated overnight with BiP antibody (Table 1), 1 μg/ml, then with horseradish-peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit (Jackson ImmunoResearch), 0.16 μg/ml, followed by HyGLO (Denville Scientific) or SuperSignal West Pico (Thermo) chemiluminescent substrate, and exposed to film.

FPP assay

HEK293 cells in 24-well plates were transfected with 0.4 μg EGFP-NYX or NYX-EGFP, or 0.6 μg EGFP-TRPM1 or TRPM1-EGFP, along with 0.2-0.4 μg dsRed; or 0.2 μg GFP and 0.4 μg dsRed-NYX; or 0.4 μg dsRed-NYX and 0.4 μg NYX-EGFP, using Lipofectamine 2000. The next day, cells were briefly trypsinized and replated in eight-well Lab-Tek II chambered coverglasses which had previously been coated with 100 μg/ml PDL. Assays were performed at RT, ∼48–52 h post-transfection. Immediately before imaging, wells were washed three times with RT KHM buffer (110 mM potassium acetate, 2 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM HEPES; pH 7.2) and left in 200 μl KHM for the assay. Digitonin (5% solution from Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher) was heated to 95°C to dissolve and diluted in KHM immediately before use. UltraClean Proteinase K (20 mg/ml, Mo Bio) was diluted in KHM immediately before use. Images were acquired with the TCS-SP5 laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica) using the 63× oil immersion objective described above, set to scan every 30 s. Following the 1-min scan, 200 μl of 200 μM digitonin was added to the well. Following the 2-min scan, 400 μl of KHM (no protease control) or 100 μg/ml proteinase K was added to the well. In most experiments, fields containing many cells (512 × 512 px, 481.5 nm/px) were imaged, and individual cells were boxed for data analysis. In some experiments, higher-magnification fields containing one to two cells (256 × 256 px, 120.6 nm/px) were imaged. In both cases, the duration of each scan was ∼10 s. Relative fluorescence F at each time point t was calculated as 100·(Fcell,t – Fbgd,t0)/(Fcell,t0 – Fbgd,t0), where Fbgd,t0 was determined from an area in the first frame containing no cells. Cells in which fluorescence of free dsRed or GFP did not decrease after addition of digitonin, indicating poor permeabilization, were omitted.

Experimental design and statistical analysis

Microscopy images are representative examples of images from at least two independent experiments. For FPP assays, results from multiple wells from at least three independent experiments were combined.

Results

TRPM1 in ON-BPC bodies and axons is intracellular

To examine the location of TRPM1 in ON-BPC bodies, mouse retina sections were labeled with an antibody for TRPM1 that was previously validated with Trpm1 knock-out mice (Agosto et al., 2014, 2018), and antibodies for Na+/K+ ATPase, a marker for plasma membranes, or PKCα, a soluble cytoplasmic protein well characterized as a marker for rod BPCs. In cell bodies, there was little or no colocalization of TRPM1 with Na+/K+ ATPase, with TRPM1 appearing to be mostly intracellular (Fig. 1B). Labeling intensity was measured along lines drawn through the boundaries between cells; in most cases, the peak TRPM1 staining was noncoincident with the peak Na+/K+ ATPase staining (Fig. 1B). To more clearly resolve the TRPM1 location in cell bodies, we employed STORM (Rust et al., 2006; Dempsey et al., 2011). STORM reconstructions of retina sections labeled with TRPM1 and Na+/K+ ATPase antibodies clearly show non-overlapping staining in the cell bodies (Fig. 1C).

Furthermore, if TRPM1 were localized to the plasma membrane, staining would be expected to be peripheral to PKCα. However, TRPM1 staining was mostly internal relative to PKCα in cell bodies (Fig. 1D). These results indicate that the majority of TRPM1 in cell bodies is located in intracellular membranes, and not in the plasma membrane. Column average intensity profiles of straightened axon segments show that TRPM1 labeling is mostly internal relative to both Na+/K+ ATPase (Fig. 2A) and PKCα (Fig. 2B) in axons as well.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

TRPM1 is intracellular in ON-BPC axons. Retina sections were labeled with TRPM1 (green) and antibodies to Na+/K+ ATPase to mark the plasma membrane (A) or PKCα to mark the cytoplasm (B; magenta). Regions containing axons were straightened, and normalized column average intensity profiles are shown. Two axons from the example images at left (regions indicated by boxes) as well as two axons from other images are shown.

Heterologously expressed TRPM1 colocalizes with the ER

To determine the intracellular localization of TRPM1, we first examined the localization of heterologously-expressed protein. In both HEK293 and CHO cells transiently cotransfected with TRPM1 and Emerald-Sec61β, an ER membrane marker (Huang et al., 2016; Rapoport et al., 2017), extensive colocalization was observed throughout the ER network (Fig. 3A,B). TRPM1 staining also colocalized with antibody staining for endogenous binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP; Fig. 3C), which resides in the ER lumen and is involved in protein folding (Rapoport et al., 2017).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

TRPM1 colocalizes with the ER in heterologous cells. A, B, HEK293 (A) or CHO (B) cells were transiently transfected with 1D4 epitope-tagged (A) or untagged (B) TRPM1 and Emerald-Sec61 (green). Cells were labeled with 1D4 (A) or TRPM1 antibody (B; magenta). C, CHO cells were transiently transfected with HA-tagged TRPM1, and labeled with HA (magenta) and BiP (green) antibodies.

ER in ON-BPCs extends into axons and dendrites, but not dendritic tips

Little is known about the location of secretory pathway organelles, including the ER, in ON-BPCs. Immunostaining ER markers is challenging, because most cells have an extensive ER network and staining appears throughout the retina (Johnson et al., 2007; also see Fig. 5B), giving rise to extensive background signal from neighboring cells. Therefore, subretinal injection and electroporation of Emerald-Sec61β under control of the mGluR6 promoter (Matsuda and Cepko, 2004; Kim et al., 2008; Lagali et al., 2008; Van Wyk et al., 2015) were employed to specifically and sparsely label ON-BPCs with an ER marker (Fig. 4). Z-stack projections show Emerald-Sec61β localization throughout the cell bodies, dendrites, and axons of transduced cells (Fig. 4A). Even in cells with relatively weak expression of Emerald-Sec61β, signal is present in axons and dendrites (Fig. 4A, left), indicating the presence of ER in those compartments. Lacy structures characteristic of the ER network can be seen in higher-magnification images (Fig. 4B), and Emerald-Sec61β largely colocalized with the endogenous ER protein BiP (Fig. 5D). Labeling sections with PKCα antibody showed that as with TRPM1, Emerald-Sec61β in cell bodies is internal to PKCα (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Localization of ER in ON-BPCs. Emerald-Sec61β was expressed in ON-BPCs by subretinal injection and electroporation of plasmid DNA using the ON-BPC-specific Grm6 promoter. A, Z-projections of confocal stacks are shown oversaturated to highlight localization of Emerald-Sec61 in axons and dendrites. B, Magnified views of cell bodies. C, Immunostaining sections from injected retinas shows that in cell bodies, PKCα is located peripherally to the ER. D, Validation of new mGluR6 mAb. Retina sections from WT (left) and nob3 (right) mice were labeled with mGluR6 antibody (green) and costained for presynaptic ribbon protein ribeye (magenta) to mark the location of synapses. Dendritic tip mGluR6 labeling is present in WT but not nob3 retinas. E, Sections from injected retinas were immunostained with the mGluR6 mAb (magenta), revealing that Emerald-Sec61β in dendrites does not extend into the dendritic tip puncta. (i) Z-projection of confocal stack. (ii) Single optical slice from the same field. (iii) Same images as in (ii), with the location of mGluR6 puncta outlined in yellow.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

TRPM1 colocalizes with ER in ON-BPCs. A, Sections from retinas expressing Emerald-Sec61β in ON-BPCs were immunostained with TRPM1 antibody (magenta). Boxes indicate regions of higher-magnification images (bottom). Colocalization is observed in cell bodies, and in some cases, dendrites (arrowheads). B, Retina sections were immunostained with TRPM1 (green) and BiP (magenta) antibodies. C–E, Validation of BiP antibody. C, BiP immunostaining colocalizes with transfected Emerald-Sec61β in CHO cells. D, BiP immunostaining colocalizes with Emerald-Sec61β in sections from injected retinas. E, Western blotting of retina lysate (25 μg) probed with BiP antibody results in a band of the expected size (∼75 kDa; Munro and Pelham, 1986).

To examine dendritic tips, we generated a monoclonal antibody against full-length mGluR6. This antibody labels dendritic tips as expected, and labeling is absent in Grm6 nob3 retina, which does not express mGluR6 protein (Maddox et al., 2008), demonstrating the specificity of the antibody (Fig. 4D). Labeling sections from injected retinas with mGluR6 antibody revealed no colocalization between Sec61β and mGluR6, indicating that the ER in dendrites does not extend into the dendritic tips (Fig. 4E). This is in contrast to PKCα, which can be seen clearly in the dendritic tip puncta (Fig. 1D, arrowheads).

TRPM1 colocalizes with the ER in ON-BPC bodies

Sections from Emerald-Sec61β-injected retinas labeled with TRPM1 antibody show that in the cell bodies, TRPM1 largely colocalizes with the ER (Fig. 5A). In some cases, TRPM1 and Emerald-Sec61β also appear to colocalize in the dendritic shafts (Fig. 5A, arrowheads), although detection of TRPM1 in dendritic shafts is not reliable. To corroborate the ER localization of TRPM1, we costained retina sections with antibody for the ER lumen protein BiP (Fig. 5B). Validation of this antibody is shown in Figure 5C–E. The limited validation data for ER marker antibodies in retina tissue, as well as the fact that much of the ER labeling originates from other cell types not expressing TRPM1, makes the staining patterns difficult to interpret. However, in ON-BPC bodies there is at least partial colocalization of BiP with TRPM1, consistent with the the results from Emerald-Sec61β-injected retinas. There is no clear evidence of ER labeling in the ON-BPC dendritic tips, consistent with the absence of Emerald-Sec61β in the tips (Fig. 4E). Since interpreting immunostaining of ON-BPCs in retina sections may be complicated by the presence of other cell types, we also examined isolated ON-BPCs in acutely dissociated retina preparations (Fig. 6). Costaining with Na+/K+ ATPase confirmed largely intracellular somatic TRPM1 (Fig. 6A), which was partially colocalized with endogenous BiP (Fig. 6B), consistent with our previous observations.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

TRPM1 is intracellular and colocalized with ER in dissociated ON-BPCs. Acutely dissociated retinas were immunostained for TRPM1 (green) and Na+/K+ ATPase (A) or BiP (B; magenta). Intensity profiles were measured along lines indicated by the arrows on the merged image, and are shown normalized to the maximum height.

Golgi localization in ON-BPCs

Immunostaining retina sections for the cis-Golgi marker GM130 (Nakamura et al., 1995) revealed filamentous or tubular structures throughout the inner nuclear layer, presumably present in various cell types (Fig. 7A); in ON-BPCs, GM130 appears to be detected mainly in the distal cell body and dendritic trunk region (Fig. 7B). The location of GM130 in ON-BPCs was confirmed in the absence of other cell types by immunostaining acutely dissociated retinal cells (Fig. 7C). There was no colocalization with TRPM1 (Fig. 7B).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

TRPM1 does not colocalize with Golgi in ON-BPCs. A, B, Retina sections were immunostained for TRPM1 (magenta) and cis-Golgi marker GM130 (green). C, To confirm the localization of Golgi in ON-BPCs, acutely dissociated retina cells were immunostained for PKCα (magenta) and GM130 (green). Zoomed-in views of GM130-labeled structures are shown at right.

G protein subunits poorly colocalize with TRPM1

Heterotrimeric G protein subunits Gαo, Gβ3, and Gγ13 participate in the postsynaptic mGluR6 cascade in ON-BPCs (Dhingra et al., 2000, 2002, 2012; Huang et al., 2003; Ramakrishnan et al., 2015), and both Gα and Gβγ have been implicated in directly regulating TRPM1 (Koike et al., 2010a, 2010b; Shen et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2016). Although all three subunits are present in ON-BPC bodies and dendrites, there appears to be little colocalization with TRPM1 (Fig. 8) except in the dendritic tips, where Gαo is present (Fig. 8A, arrowheads). Gβ3 and Gγ13 immunostaining was not sufficiently clear to confidently visualize them in the dendritic tips (Fig. 8B,C, arrowheads).

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

G protein subunits are poorly colocalized with TRPM1. Retina sections were immunostained for TRPM1 (magenta) and Gαo (A), Gβ3 (B), or Gγ13 (C; green). Low-magnification images are shown at left, and boxed regions are shown in magnified views below. Arrowheads indicate dendritic tip puncta.

TRPM1 N and C termini are cytoplasmic

Limited sequence similarity between the transmembrane (TM) domain of TRPM1 and those of other TRP family channels suggests that TRPM1 has six TM helices (Agosto et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2017). However, no experimental data regarding the topology of the protein have been reported, and different TM prediction algorithms yield varying results. A FPP assay (Lorenz et al., 2006; Tie et al., 2012; Nixon et al., 2013), in conjunction with live cell imaging, was used to assess the membrane topology of TRPM1 and NYX (Fig. 9). HEK293 cells expressing GFP fusion proteins were treated with the detergent digitonin to permeabilize the plasma membrane selectively without disrupting the ER, followed by proteinase K treatment to digest regions accessible to the cytoplasm. If the terminus fused to GFP is in the cytoplasm, it should be rapidly digested, measured as a decrease in fluorescence, whereas if the terminus is in the ER lumen, it should be protected from digestion. Mouse NYX, which is known to have an extracellular or ER-luminal N terminus and a cytoplasmic C terminus (Bojang and Gregg, 2012), was used as a control. As expected, the fluorescence of cells expressing NYX-GFP decreased rapidly on addition of protease, while that of cells expressing GFP-NYX or dsRed-NYX was resistant for several minutes. The fluorescence of cells expressing TRPM1 with GFP at either the N or the C terminus was sensitive to protease treatment, indicating cytoplasmic accessibility of both termini, consistent with an even number of transmembrane segments, almost certainly six, as found in TRP channels with known structures.

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

Topological analysis of heterologously expressed TRPM1. A, Diagram of NYX and TRPM1 fluorescent fusions. B, Example imaging timecourses of live cells. In some samples, cells were cotransfected with free dsRed to monitor digitonin action. On addition of digitonin to permeabilize the plasma membrane without disruption of the ER, dsRed diffuses rapidly out of the cytoplasm, then subsequently out of the nucleus. The fluorescence of GFP-NYX is resistant to proteinase K, implying GFP and the NYX N terminus are in the ER lumen, whereas that of GFP-TRPM1 and TRPM1-GFP is susceptible, revealing a cytoplasmic location for both C- and N-terminal GFP fusions. C, Cells from image timecourses as in B, as well as cells boxed from lower-magnification images, were combined, and fluorescence expressed as a percentage of the initial signal. Curves are the means of results from the number of cells indicated, with shaded regions representing mean ± 1 SD. Dashed lines following the 1- and 2-min time points indicate the approximate time of addition of digitonin and proteinase K, respectively.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that TRPM1 in ON-BPC bodies is intracellular and located predominantly in the ER, and not the plasma membrane or Golgi apparatus (Figs. 1, 2, 5–7). This intracellular localization suggests that TRPM1 is inserted at the plasma membrane either in the dendrites or at the dendritic tips where it is concentrated. The subcellular localization of TRPM1 in dendritic shafts could not be determined, as TRPM1 signal is very poorly detected in dendrites, except at the dendritic tips. However, one hypothesis is that TRPM1 is trafficked all the way to the dendritic tips in the secretory pathway, where forward trafficking and/or plasma membrane insertion is triggered by a signal from a synapse-specific component. This hypothesis is consistent with the observations that knocking out other synaptic components reduces TRPM1 dendritic tip localization (Cao et al., 2011, 2015; Pearring et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012; Gregg et al., 2014; Neuillé et al., 2015), if a correctly-formed synaptic complex is a prerequisite for TRPM1 plasma membrane insertion.

In other types of neurons, dendrites contain ER network, ER to Golgi intermediate compartments, and sometimes Golgi outposts. Synaptic proteins are trafficked by diverse secretory routes (for review, see Kennedy and Ehlers, 2006; Ramírez and Couve, 2011; Valenzuela and Perez, 2015) including long-haul transport or diffusion within dendritic ER (Cui-Wang et al., 2012; Valenzuela et al., 2014) and Golgi-independent secretory trafficking (Bowen et al., 2017). Secretory pathways in retinal BPCs are still relatively unexplored. We show that the exogenously-expressed ER protein Sec61β is present in somas, axons, and dendrites (Fig. 4), indicating that, as in other neurons, the ER network in retinal BPCs extends into axons and dendrites. The two ER markers employed, endogenous BiP and electroporated Sec61β, appear to have overlapping but nonidentical distributions, likely reflecting the heterogeneous nature of the ER. The widespread localization of TRPM1 in somas and axons (Figs. 1, 2) suggests that it may diffuse freely in a continuous ER network membrane. The identities of organelles participating in post-ER trafficking, and the signals that direct plasma membrane insertion, are unknown.

Also mysterious is the large ER pool of TRPM1. It may reflect merely an excess of trafficking or assembly intermediates; it would not be surprising to find biosynthetic intermediates of membrane proteins in the ER. On the other hand, the distribution of TRPM1 is notably different from other transmembrane participants in the synaptic signaling pathway, with more than half found in the cell bodies (Agosto et al., 2018). An alternative explanation is that TRPM1 may have a distinct function in the ER membrane. In melanocytes, functional roles for intracellular TRPM1 in melanin synthesis and calcium homeostasis have been reported (Oancea et al., 2009; Devi et al., 2009, 2013). The related TRPM channels TRPM2 (Lange et al., 2009; Manna et al., 2015) and TRPM8 (Bidaux et al., 2015) have also been shown to have intracellular functions. Like TRPM1, the heterotrimeric G protein subunits mediating synaptic transduction reside partially in cell bodies. However, no obvious colocalization was observed with somatic TRPM1 (Fig. 8), suggesting that if ER-resident TRPM1 does have a function, it may not depend on Gαo, Gβ3, or Gγ13.

TRPM1 is present in both rod and cone ON-BPC bodies (Fig. 1D, asterisks). Although the localization appears similar in all ON-BPCs costained with plasma membrane or ER markers, we did not specifically differentiate rod and cone BPCs. It is possible that these cells employ different routes and/or regulation of TRPM1 secretory trafficking or support different functions for intracellular TRPM1.

No trafficking signals have been identified yet in TRPM1. Cytoplasmic ER retention signals have been identified in numerous channel subunits including NMDA receptors (Standley et al., 2000; Scott et al., 2001, 2003), ATP-sensitive K+ channels (Zerangue et al., 1999), voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (Bichet et al., 2000), voltage-gated Na+ channels (Zhang et al., 2008), and TRP channels (Köttgen et al., 2005). Topology analysis (Fig. 9) showed both N and C termini of TRPM1 are in the cytoplasm, as expected from structures of other TRP channels (Liao et al., 2013; Paulsen et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2017; Winkler et al., 2017; Autzen et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2018), and it is likely that one or both of the cytoplasmic arms contains sequences that direct and regulate forward trafficking. Deciphering sequence determinants of TRPM1 trafficking and its route to the dendritic tip plasma membrane will be important for understanding the maintenance of functional synapses in ON-BPCs.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants R01-EY007981/EY007981-S1, R01-EY025218, and R01-EY026545 (to T.G.W.), F32-EY020067 (to M.A.A.), F32-EY024815 (to I.A.A.), and F32-EY027171 (to M.A.R.); by a Knights Templar Eye Foundation Pediatric Ophthalmology Career-Starter Grant (to M.A.A.); by the Welch Foundation Grant Q0035; and by the Monoclonal Antibody/Recombinant Protein Expression Shared Resource at Baylor College of Medicine with funding from NIH Cancer Center Support Grant P30-CA125123.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Agosto MA, Zhang Z, He F, Anastassov IA, Wright SJ, McGehee J, Wensel TG (2014) Oligomeric state of purified transient receptor potential melastatin-1 (TRPM1), a protein essential for dim light vision. J Biol Chem 289:27019–27033. doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.593780 pmid:25112866
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Agosto MA, Anastassov IA, Wensel TG (2018) Differential epitope masking reveals synapse-specific complexes of TRPM1. Vis Neurosci 35:e001. doi:10.1017/S0952523817000360 pmid:29370879
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Anastassov IA, Wang W, Dunn FA (2017) Synaptogenesis and synaptic protein localization in the postnatal development of rod bipolar cell dendrites in mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 00:1–15. doi:10.1002/cne.24251
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    Audo I, Kohl S, Leroy BP, Munier FL, Guillonneau X, Mohand-Saïd S, Bujakowska K, Nandrot EF, Lorenz B, Preising M, Kellner U, Renner AB, Bernd A, Antonio A, Moskova-Doumanova V, Lancelot M, Poloschek CM, Drumare I, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Wissinger B, et al. (2009) TRPM1 is mutated in patients with autosomal-recessive complete congenital stationary night blindness. Am J Hum Genet 85:720–729. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.013 pmid:19896113
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Autzen HE, Myasnikov AG, Campbell MG, Asarnow D, Julius D, Cheng Y (2018) Structure of the human TRPM4 ion channel in a lipid nanodisc. Science 359:228–232. doi:10.1126/science.aar4510 pmid:29217581
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Beaudoin GMJ, Lee S-H, Singh D, Yuan Y, Ng Y-G, Reichardt LF, Arikkath J (2012) Culturing pyramidal neurons from the early postnatal mouse hippocampus and cortex. Nat Protoc 7:1741–1754. doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.099 pmid:22936216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Berntson A, Taylor WR, Morgans CW (2003) Molecular identity, synaptic localization, and physiology of calcium channels in retinal bipolar cells. J Neurosci Res 71:146–151. doi:10.1002/jnr.10459 pmid:12478624
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Bichet D, Cornet V, Geib S, Carlier E, Volsen S, Hoshi T, Mori Y, De Waard M (2000) The I-II loop of the Ca 2+ channel alpha1 subunit contains an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal antagonized by the beta subunit. Neuron 25:177–190. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80881-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Bidaux G, Borowiec A, Gordienko D, Beck B, Shapovalov GG, Lemonnier L, Flourakis M, Vandenberghe M, Slomianny C, Dewailly E, Delcourt P, Desruelles E, Ritaine A, Polakowska R, Lesage J, Chami M, Skryma R, Prevarskaya N (2015) Epidermal TRPM8 channel isoform controls the balance between keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation in a cold-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E3345–E3354. doi:10.1073/pnas.1423357112
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Bock H, Geisler C, Von Middendorff C, Jakobs S, Schonle A, Egner A, Hell SW, Eggeling C (2007) Two-color far-field fluorescence nanoscopy based on photoswitchable emitters. Appl Phys B 88:161–165. doi:10.1007/s00340-007-2729-0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    Bojang P, Gregg RG (2012) Topological analysis of small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycan nyctalopin. PLoS One 7:e33137. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033137 pmid:22485138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Bowen AB, Bourke AM, Hiester BG, Hanus C, Kennedy MJ (2017) Golgi-independent secretory trafficking through recycling endosomes in neuronal dendrites and spines. Elife 6:e27362. doi:10.7554/eLife.27362
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    Cao Y, Posokhova E, Martemyanov KA (2011) TRPM1 forms complexes with nyctalopin in vivo and accumulates in postsynaptic compartment of ON-bipolar neurons in mGluR6-dependent manner. J Neurosci 31:11521–11526. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1682-11.2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Cao Y, Sarria I, Fehlhaber KE, Kamasawa N, Orlandi C, James KN, Hazen JL, Gardner MR, Farzan M, Lee A, Baker S, Baldwin K, Sampath AP, Martemyanov KA (2015) Mechanism for selective synaptic wiring of rod photoreceptors into the retinal circuitry and its role in vision. Neuron 87:1248–1260. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.002 pmid:26402607
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. Concepcion F, Chen J (2010) Q344ter mutation causes mislocalization of rhodopsin molecules that are catalytically active: a mouse model of Q344ter-induced retinal degeneration. PLoS One 5:e10904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010904 pmid:20532191
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. Consalvi S, Brancaccio A, Dall’Agnese A, Puri PL, Palacios D (2017) Praja1 E3 ubiquitin ligase promotes skeletal myogenesis through degradation of EZH2 upon p38α activation. Nat Commun 8:13956. doi:10.1038/ncomms13956
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    Cui-Wang T, Hanus C, Cui T, Helton T, Bourne J, Watson D, Harris KM, Ehlers MD (2012) Local zones of endoplasmic reticulum complexity confine cargo in neuronal dendrites. Cell 148:309–321. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.056 pmid:22265418
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Dempsey GT, Vaughan JC, Chen KH, Bates M, Zhuang X (2011) Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging. Nat Methods 8:1027–1036. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1768 pmid:22056676
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Devi S, Kedlaya R, Maddodi N, Bhat KMR, Weber CS, Valdivia H, Setaluri V (2009) Calcium homeostasis in human melanocytes: role of transient receptor potential melastatin 1 (TRPM1) and its regulation by ultraviolet light. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 297:C679–C687. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00092.2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Devi S, Markandeya Y, Maddodi N, Dhingra A, Vardi N, Balijepalli RC, Setaluri V (2013) Metabotropic glutamate receptor 6 signaling enhances TRPM1 calcium channel function and increases melanin content in human melanocytes. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 26:348–356. doi:10.1111/pcmr.12083 pmid:23452348
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Dhingra A, Lyubarsky A, Jiang M, Pugh EN, Birnbaumer L, Sterling P, Vardi N (2000) The light response of ON bipolar neurons requires G[alpha]o. J Neurosci 20:9053–9058. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-24-09053.2000
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Dhingra A, Jiang M, Wang T-L, Lyubarsky A, Savchenko A, Bar-Yehuda T, Sterling P, Birnbaumer L, Vardi N (2002) Light response of retinal ON bipolar cells requires a specific splice variant of Gαo. J Neurosci 22:4878–4884. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-12-04878.2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Dhingra A, Ramakrishnan H, Neinstein A, Fina ME, Xu Y, Li J, Chung DC, Lyubarsky A, Vardi N (2012) Gβ3 is required for normal light ON responses and synaptic maintenance. J Neurosci 32:11343–11355. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1436-12.2012 pmid:22895717
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Dunn FA, Wong ROL (2014) Wiring patterns in the mouse retina: collecting evidence across the connectome, physiology and light microscopy. J Physiol 592:4809–4823. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.277228
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Giménez E, Montoliu L (2001) A simple polymerase chain reaction assay for genotyping the retinal degeneration mutation (Pdeb rd1) in FVB/N-derived transgenic mice. Lab Anim 35:153–156. doi:10.1258/0023677011911525 pmid:11315164
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Gregg RG, Ray TA, Hasan N, McCall MA, Peachey NS (2014) Interdependence among members of the mGluR6 G-protein mediated signalplex of retinal depolarizing bipolar cells. In: G protein signaling mechanisms in the retina ( Martemyanov KA, Sampath AP , eds), pp 67–79. New York: Springer.
  27. ↵
    Guo J, She J, Zeng W, Chen Q, Bai X, Jiang Y (2017) Structures of the calcium-activated, non-selective cation channel TRPM4. Nature 552:205–209. doi:10.1038/nature24997 pmid:29211714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. Han F, Liu C, Zhang L, Chen M, Zhou Y, Qin Y, Wang Y, Chen M, Duo S, Cui X, Bao S, Gao F (2017) Globozoospermia and lack of acrosome formation in GM130-deficient mice. Cell Death Dis 8:e2532. doi:10.1038/cddis.2016.414 pmid:28055014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. Han TK, Everett RS, Proctor WR, Ng CM, Costales CL, Brouwer KLR, Thakker DR (2013) Organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1/mOct1) is localized in the apical membrane of Caco-2 cell monolayers and enterocytes. Mol Pharmacol 84:182–189. doi:10.1124/mol.112.084517 pmid:23680637
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Heilemann M, van de Linde S, Schüttpelz M, Kasper R, Seefeldt B, Mukherjee A, Tinnefeld P, Sauer M (2008) Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 47:6172–6176. doi:10.1002/anie.200802376 pmid:18646237
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. Hodges RS, Heaton RJ, Parker JMR, Molday L, Molday RS (1988) Antigen-antibody interaction. Synthetic peptides define linear antigenic determinants recognized by monoclonal antibodies directed to the cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus of rhodopsin. J Biol Chem 263:11768–11775. pmid:2457026
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Huang F, Sirinakis G, Allgeyer ES, Schroeder LK, Duim WC, Kromann EB, Phan T, Rivera-Molina FE, Myers JR, Irnov I, Lessard M, Zhang Y, Handel MA, Jacobs-Wagner C, Lusk CP, Rothman JE, Toomre D, Booth MJ, Bewersdorf J (2016) Ultra-high resolution 3D imaging of whole cells. Cell 166:1028–1040. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.016 pmid:27397506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Huang L, Max M, Margolskee RF, Su H, Masland RH, Euler T (2003) G protein subunit G gamma 13 is coexpressed with G alpha o, G beta 3, and G beta 4 in retinal ON bipolar cells. J Comp Neur 455:1–10. doi:10.1002/cne.10396 pmid:12454992
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. Hubler D, Rankovic M, Richter K, Lazarevic V, Altrock WD, Fischer D, Gundelfinger ED, Fejtova A (2012) Differential spatial expression and subcellular localization of CtBP family members in rodent brain. PLoS One 7:e39710. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039710
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. Huynh KW, Cohen MR, Jiang J, Samanta A, Lodowski DT, Zhou ZH, Moiseenkova-Bell VY (2016) Structure of the full-length TRPV2 channel by cryo-EM. Nat Commun 7:11130. doi:10.1038/ncomms11130 pmid:27021073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. Iwai-Takekoshi L, Ramos A, Schaler A, Weinreb S, Blazeski R, Mason C (2016) Retinal pigment epithelial integrity is compromised in the developing albino mouse retina. J Comp Neur 524:3696–3716. doi:10.1002/cne.24025 pmid:27097562
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Johnson JE, Perkins GA, Giddabasappa A, Chaney S, Xiao W, White AD, Brown JM, Waggoner J, Ellisman MH, Fox DA (2007) Spatiotemporal regulation of ATP and Ca2+ dynamics in vertebrate rod and cone ribbon synapses. Mol Vis 13:887–919. pmid:17653034
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    Kennedy MJ, Ehlers MD (2006) Organelles and trafficking machinery for postsynaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 29:325–362. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112808 pmid:16776589
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Kim DS, Matsuda T, Cepko CL (2008) A core paired-type and POU homeodomain-containing transcription factor program drives retinal bipolar cell gene expression. J Neurosci 28:7748–7764. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0397-08.2008 pmid:18667607
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. Koh H-J, Kim Y-R, Kim J-S, Yun J-S, Jang K, Yang C-S (2017) Toxoplasma gondii GRA7-targeted ASC and PLD1 promote antibacterial host defense via PKCα. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006126. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006126 pmid:28125719
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Koike C, Numata T, Ueda H, Mori Y, Furukawa T (2010a) TRPM1: a vertebrate TRP channel responsible for retinal ON bipolar function. Cell Calcium 48:95–101. doi:10.1016/j.ceca.2010.08.004 pmid:20846719
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Koike C, Obara T, Uriu Y, Numata T, Sanuki R, Miyata K, Koyasu T, Ueno S, Funabiki K, Tani A, Ueda H, Kondo M, Mori Y, Tachibana M, Furukawa T (2010b) TRPM1 is a component of the retinal ON bipolar cell transduction channel in the mGluR6 cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:332–337. doi:10.1073/pnas.0912730107 pmid:19966281
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Köttgen M, Benzing T, Simmen T, Tauber R, Buchholz B, Feliciangeli S, Huber TB, Schermer B, Kramer-Zucker A, Höpker K, Simmen KC, Tschucke CC, Sandford R, Kim E, Thomas G, Walz G (2005) Trafficking of TRPP2 by PACS proteins represents a novel mechanism of ion channel regulation. EMBO J 24:705–716. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600566 pmid:15692563
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Lagali PS, Balya D, Awatramani GB, Münch TA, Kim DS, Busskamp V, Cepko CL, Roska B (2008) Light-activated channels targeted to ON bipolar cells restore visual function in retinal degeneration. Nat Neurosci 11:667–675. doi:10.1038/nn.2117 pmid:18432197
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Lambert S, Drews A, Rizun O, Wagner TFJ, Lis A, Mannebach S, Plant S, Portz M, Meissner M, Philipp SE, Oberwinkler J (2011) Transient receptor potential melastatin 1 (TRPM1) is an ion-conducting plasma membrane channel inhibited by zinc. J Biol Chem 286:12221–12233. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.202945
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Lange I, Yamamoto S, Partida-Sanchez S, Mori Y, Fleig A, Penner R (2009) TRPM2 functions as a lysosomal Ca2+-release channel in β cells. Sci Signal 2:ra23. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000278 pmid:19454650
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. Li X, Mumby SM, Greenwood A, Jope RS (1995) Pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein alpha-subunits: production of monoclonal antibodies and detection of differential increases on differentiation of PC12 and LA-N-5 cells. J Neurochem 64:1107–1117. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64031107.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Li Z, Sergouniotis PI, Michaelides M, Mackay DS, Wright GA, Devery S, Moore AT, Holder GE, Robson AG, Webster AR (2009) Recessive mutations of the gene TRPM1 abrogate ON bipolar cell function and cause complete congenital stationary night blindness in humans. Am J Hum Genet 85:711–719. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.003 pmid:19878917
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Liao M, Cao E, Julius D, Cheng Y (2013) Structure of the TRPV1 ion channel determined by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature 504:107–112. doi:10.1038/nature12822 pmid:24305160
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Lorenz H, Hailey DW, Wunder C, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2006) The fluorescence protease protection (FPP) assay to determine protein localization and membrane topology. Nat Protoc 1:276–279. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.42
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. Lu Q, Ivanova E, Ganjawala TH, Pan Z-H (2013) Cre-mediated recombination efficiency and transgene expression patterns of three retinal bipolar cell-expressing Cre transgenic mouse lines. Mol Vis 19:1310–1321. pmid:23805038
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. Mackenzie D, Arendt A, Hargrave P, McDowell JH, Molday RS (1984) Localization of binding sites for carboxyl terminal specific anti-rhodopsin monoclonal antibodies using synthetic peptides. Biochemistry 23:6544–6549. pmid:6529569
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. Macrez N, Morel J-L, Mironneau J (1999) Specific Galpha11beta3gamma5 protein involvement in endothelin receptor-induced phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and Ca2+ release in rat portal vein myocytes. Mol Pharmacol 55:684–692. pmid:10101026
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Maddox DM, Vessey KA, Yarbrough GL, Invergo BM, Cantrell DR, Inayat S, Balannik V, Hicks WL, Hawes NL, Byers S, Smith RS, Hurd R, Howell D, Gregg RG, Chang B, Naggert JK, Troy JB, Pinto LH, Nishina PM, McCall MA (2008) Allelic variance between GRM6 mutants, Grm6nob3 and Grm6nob4 results in differences in retinal ganglion cell visual responses. J Physiol 586:4409–4424. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.157289 pmid:18687716
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Manna PT, Munsey TS, Abuarab N, Li F, Asipu A, Howell G, Sedo A, Yang W, Naylor J, Beech DJ, Jiang L-H, Sivaprasadarao A (2015) TRPM2-mediated intracellular Zn2+ release triggers pancreatic β-cell death. Biochem J 466:537–546. doi:10.1042/BJ20140747 pmid:25562606
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Martemyanov KA, Sampath AP (2017) The transduction cascade in retinal ON-bipolar cells: signal processing and disease. Annu Rev Vis Sci 3:25–51. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061338 pmid:28715957
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Masu M, Iwakabe H, Tagawa Y, Miyoshi T, Yamashita M, Fukuda Y, Sasaki H, Hiroi K, Nakamura Y, Shigemoto R, Takada M, Nakamura K, Nakao K, Katsuki M, Nakanishi S (1995) Specific deficit of the ON response in visual transmission by targeted disruption of the mGluR6 gene. Cell 80:757–765. pmid:7889569
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Matsuda T, Cepko CL (2004) Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16–22. doi:10.1073/pnas.2235688100 pmid:14603031
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    Matsuda T, Cepko CL (2008) Analysis of gene function in the retina. Methods Mol Biol 423:259–278. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-194-9_19 pmid:18370205
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Mattapallil MJ, Wawrousek EF, Chan C-C, Zhao H, Roychoudhury J, Ferguson TA, Caspi RR (2012) The rd8 mutation of the Crb1 gene is present in vendor lines of C57BL/6N mice and embryonic stem cells, and confounds ocular induced mutant phenotypes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:2921–2927. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-9662 pmid:22447858
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. Molday RS, MacKenzie D (1983) Monoclonal antibodies to rhodopsin: characterization, cross-reactivity, and application as structural probes. Biochemistry 22:653–660. pmid:6188482
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Morgans CW, Ren G, Akileswaran L (2006) Localization of nyctalopin in the mammalian retina. Eur J Neurosci 23:1163–1171. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04647.x pmid:16553780
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    Morgans CW; Weiwei Liu, Wensel TG, Brown RL, Perez-Leon JA, Bearnot B, Duvoisin RM (2007) Gbeta5-RGS complexes co-localize with mGluR6 in retinal ON-bipolar cells. Eur J Neurosci 26:2899–2905. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05867.x pmid:18001285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Morgans CW, Zhang J, Jeffrey BG, Nelson SM, Burke NS, Duvoisin RM, Brown RL (2009) TRPM1 is required for the depolarizing light response in retinal ON-bipolar cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19174–19178. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908711106 pmid:19861548
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    Munro S, Pelham HRB (1986) An Hsp70-like protein in the ER: identity with the 78 kd glucose-regulated protein and immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein. Cell 46:291–300. pmid:3087629
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    Nakamura N, Rabouille C, Watson R, Nilsson T, Hui N, Slusarewicz P, Kreis TE, Warren G (1995) Characterization of a cis-Golgi matrix protein, GM130. J Cell Biol 131:1715–1726. pmid:8557739
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    Neuillé M, Morgans CW, Cao Y, Orhan E, Michiels C, Sahel J-A, Audo I, Duvoisin RM, Martemyanov KA, Zeitz C (2015) LRIT3 is essential to localize TRPM1 to the dendritic tips of depolarizing bipolar cells and may play a role in cone synapse formation. Eur J Neurosci 42:1966–1975. doi:10.1111/ejn.12959 pmid:25997951
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Nixon A, Jia Y, White C, Bradbury NA (2013) Determination of the membrane topology of lemur tyrosine kinase 2 (LMTK2) by fluorescence protease protection. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 304:C164–C169. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00288.2012 pmid:23114966
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Nomura A, Shigemoto R, Nakamura Y, Okamoto N, Mizuno N, Nakanishi S (1994) Developmentally regulated postsynaptic localization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor in rat rod bipolar cells. Cell 77:361–369. pmid:8181056
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Oancea E, Vriens J, Brauchi S, Jun J, Splawski I, Clapham DE (2009) TRPM1 forms ion channels associated with melanin content in melanocytes. Sci Signal 2:ra21. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000146 pmid:19436059
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    Olivier N, Keller D, Rajan VS, Gönczy P, Manley S (2013) Simple buffers for 3D STORM microscopy. Biomed Opt Express 4:885–899. doi:10.1364/BOE.4.000885 pmid:23761850
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    Orlandi C, Cao Y, Martemyanov KA (2013) Orphan receptor GPR179 forms macromolecular complexes with components of metabotropic signaling cascade in retina ON-bipolar neurons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:7153–7161. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12907 pmid:24114537
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. Park S, Kim S, Kim MJ, Hong Y, Young A, Lee AY, Lee H, Tran Q, Kim M, Cho H, Park J, Kim KP, Park J, Cho M-H (2018) GOLGA2 loss causes fibrosis with autophagy in the mouse lung and liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 495:594–600. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.049 pmid:29128360
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    Paulsen CE, Armache J-P, Gao Y, Cheng Y, Julius D (2015) Structure of the TRPA1 ion channel suggests regulatory mechanisms. Nature 520:511–517. doi:10.1038/nature14367 pmid:25855297
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    Peachey NS, Pearring JN, Bojang P, Hirschtritt ME, Sturgill-Short G, Ray TA, Furukawa T, Koike C, Goldberg AFX, Shen Y, McCall MA, Nawy S, Nishina PM, Gregg RG (2012a) Depolarizing bipolar cell dysfunction due to a Trpm1 point mutation. J Neurophysiol 108:2442–2451. doi:10.1152/jn.00137.2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    Peachey NS, Ray TA, Florijn R, Rowe LB, Sjoerdsma T, Contreras-Alcantara S, Baba K, Tosini G, Pozdeyev N, Iuvone PM, Bojang P, Pearring JN, Simonsz HJ, van Genderen M, Birch DG, Traboulsi EI, Dorfman A, Lopez I, Ren H, Goldberg AFX, et al. (2012b) GPR179 is required for depolarizing bipolar cell function and is mutated in autosomal-recessive complete congenital stationary night blindness. Am J Hum Genet 90:331–339. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.12.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    Pearring JN, Bojang P, Shen Y, Koike C, Furukawa T, Nawy S, Gregg RG (2011) A role for nyctalopin, a small leucine-rich repeat protein, in localizing the TRP melastatin 1 channel to retinal depolarizing bipolar cell dendrites. J Neurosci 31:10060–10066. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1014-11.2011 pmid:21734298
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    Ramakrishnan H, Dhingra A, Tummala SR, Fina ME, Li JJ, Lyubarsky A, Vardi N (2015) Differential function of Gγ13 in rod bipolar and ON cone bipolar cells. J Physiol 593:1531–1550. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.281196 pmid:25416620
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    Ramírez OA, Couve A (2011) The endoplasmic reticulum and protein trafficking in dendrites and axons. Trends Cell Biol 21:219–227. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2010.12.003 pmid:21215635
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    Rapoport TA, Li L, Park E (2017) Structural and mechanistic insights into protein translocation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 33:369–390. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060439 pmid:28564553
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. Regus-Leidig H, Specht D, Tom Dieck S, Brandstätter JH (2010) Stability of active zone components at the photoreceptor ribbon complex. Mol Vis 16:2690–2700. pmid:21179232
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. Ribic A, Liu X, Crair MC, Biederer T (2014) Structural organization and function of mouse photoreceptor ribbon synapses involve the immunoglobulin protein synaptic cell adhesion molecule 1. J Comp Neur 522:900–920. doi:10.1002/cne.23452 pmid:23982969
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Robichaux MA, Potter VL, Zhang Z, He F, Schmid MF, Wensel TG (2017) Defining the layers of a sensory cilium with STORM and cryo-electron nanoscopies. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/198655.
  84. Robillard KR, Hoque T, Bendayan R (2012) Expression of ATP-Binding cassette membrane transporters in rodent and human Sertoli cells: relevance to the permeability of antiretroviral therapy at the blood-testis barrier. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 340:96–108. doi:10.1124/jpet.111.186916 pmid:21990609
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. ↵
    Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X (2006) Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods 3:793–795. doi:10.1038/nmeth929 pmid:16896339
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    Schneider FM, Mohr F, Behrendt M, Oberwinkler J (2015) Properties and functions of TRPM1 channels in the dendritic tips of retinal ON-bipolar cells. Eur J Cell Biol 94:420–427. doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2015.06.005 pmid:26111660
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    Scott DB, Blanpied TA, Swanson GT, Zhang C, Ehlers MD (2001) An NMDA receptor ER retention signal regulated by phosphorylation and alternative splicing. J Neurosci 21:3063–3072. pmid:11312291
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    Scott DB, Blanpied TA, Ehlers MD (2003) Coordinated PKA and PKC phosphorylation suppresses RXR-mediated ER retention and regulates the surface delivery of NMDA receptors. Neuropharmacology 45:755–767. pmid:14529714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    Shen Y, Heimel JA, Kamermans M, Peachey NS, Gregg RG, Nawy S (2009) A transient receptor potential-like channel mediates synaptic transmission in rod bipolar cells. J Neurosci 29:6088–6093. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0132-09.2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    Shen Y, Rampino MAF, Carroll RC, Nawy S (2012) G-protein–mediated inhibition of the Trp channel TRPM1 requires the Gβγ dimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:8752–8757. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117433109 pmid:22586107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    Standley S, Roche KW, Mccallum J, Sans N, Wenthold RJ (2000) PDZ domain suppression of an ER retention signal in NMDA receptor NR1 splice variants. Neuron 28:887–898. pmid:11163274
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    Tie JK, Jin DY, Stafford DW (2012) Human vitamin K epoxide reductase and its bacterial homologue have different membrane topologies and reaction mechanisms. J Biol Chem 287:33945–33955. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.402941 pmid:22923610
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. ↵
    Valenzuela JI, Perez F (2015) Diversifying the secretory routes in neurons. Front Neurosci 9:358. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00358 pmid:26500481
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    Valenzuela JI, Jaureguiberry-Bravo M, Salas DA, Ramírez OA, Cornejo VH, Lu HE, Blanpied TA, Couve A (2014) Transport along the dendritic endoplasmic reticulum mediates the trafficking of GABAB receptors. J Cell Sci 127:3382–3395. doi:10.1242/jcs.151092 pmid:24895402
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    Van Genderen MM, Bijveld MMC, Claassen YB, Florijn RJ, Pearring JN, Meire FM, Mccall MA, Riemslag FCC, Gregg RG, Bergen AAB, Kamermans M (2009) Mutations in TRPM1 are a common cause of complete congenital stationary night blindness. Am J Hum Genet 85:730–736. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    Van Wyk M, Pielecka-Fortuna J, Löwel S, Kleinlogel S (2015) Restoring the ON switch in blind retinas: opto-mGluR6, a next-generation, cell-tailored optogenetic tool. PLoS Biol 13:e1002143. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002143 pmid:25950461
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    Winkler PA, Huang Y, Sun W, Du J, Lü W (2017) Electron cryo-microscopy structure of a human TRPM4 channel. Nature 552:200–204. doi:10.1038/nature24674 pmid:29211723
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. Wong JP, Reboul E, Molday RS, Kast J (2009) A carboxy-terminal affinity tag for the purification and mass spectrometric characterization of integral membrane proteins. J Proteome Res 8:2388–2396. doi:10.1021/pr801008c
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    Xu Y, Dhingra A, Fina ME, Koike C, Furukawa T, Vardi N (2012) mGluR6 deletion renders the TRPM1 channel in retina inactive. J Neurophysiol 107:948–957. doi:10.1152/jn.00933.2011 pmid:22131384
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    Xu Y, Orlandi C, Cao Y, Yang S, Choi C-I, Pagadala V, Birnbaumer L, Martemyanov KA, Vardi N (2016) The TRPM1 channel in ON-bipolar cells is gated by both the α and the βγ subunits of the G-protein Go. Sci Rep 6:20940. doi:10.1038/srep20940 pmid:26883481
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. ↵
    Yin Y, Wu M, Zubcevic L, Borschel WF, Lander GC, Lee S-Y (2018) Structure of the cold- and menthol-sensing ion channel TRPM8. Science 359:237–241. doi:10.1126/science.aan4325 pmid:29217583
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. ↵
    Zerangue N, Schwappach B, Jan YN, Jan LY (1999) A new ER trafficking signal regulates the subunit stoichiometry of plasma membrane K ATP channels. Neuron 22:537–548. pmid:10197533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    Zhang Z-N, Li Q, Liu C, Wang H-B, Wang Q, Bao L (2008) The voltage-gated Na+ channel Nav1.8 contains an ER-retention/retrieval signal antagonized by the beta3 subunit. J Cell Sci 121:3243–3252. doi:10.1242/jcs.026856 pmid:18782866
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  104. Zhao D, Lu X, Wang G, Lan Z, Liao W, Li J, Liang X, Chen JR, Shah S, Shang X, Tang M, Deng P, Dey P, Chakravarti D, Chen P, Spring DJ, Navone NM, Troncoso P, Zhang J, Wang YA, et al. (2017) Synthetic essentiality of chromatin remodelling factor CHD1 in PTEN-deficient cancer. Nature 542:484–488. doi:10.1038/nature21357 pmid:28166537
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Douglas Bayliss, University of Virginia School of Medicine

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Joshua Singer. Note: If this manuscript was transferred from JNeurosci and a decision was made to accept the manuscript without peer review, a brief statement to this effect will instead be what is listed below.

This manuscript was seen by a new reviewer at eNeuro, who also appreciated the technical quality of the work and the insights provided regarding the pathway by which TRPM1 is trafficked to and inserted into postsynapses in ON bipolar cells. Some additional minor revisions were suggested to clarify the methods and results. These specific comments are provided below.

Reviewer #1

Advances the Field

The manuscript provides insight into the pathway by which TRPM1 is trafficked to and inserted into postsynapses in ON bipolar cells.

Comments to the Authors

Retinal slice experiments: were animals kept in the dark prior to dissection, or were they light-adapted? If the former, were dissections done under dim red or IR light? One might expect light-dependent differences in TRPM1 localization. Relatedly, could the results from double-labeling of G protein subunits (Figure 8) depend on ambient illumination?

Readers would benefit from some simple explanation-just a line or two will suffice-of each protein marker used: what it is/does, why it was chosen, etc... For example, in addition to BiP, PDI was used as a luminal marker for ER: why? Additionally, ribeye was used as a presynaptic marker but not mentioned in the results.

Aside from the mGluR6 experiments (Figure 4E), no controls for specificity were done in this paper (or I missed them). The topic of specificity in immunohistochemistry can trigger a lot of discussion and debate, but it is necessary, and the authors should address where the antibodies were validated.

A simple explanation of the FPP assay would be helpful.

The first subtitle in “Results” gives the impression that TRPM1 is only in axons and cell bodies, but it certainly is in dendrites. The subtitle should be edited.

A few edits to bring the issue of trafficking and insertion to the fore would be useful.

View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 3
May/June 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Large Endoplasmic Reticulum-Resident Pool of TRPM1 in Retinal ON-Bipolar Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Large Endoplasmic Reticulum-Resident Pool of TRPM1 in Retinal ON-Bipolar Cells
Melina A. Agosto, Ivan A. Anastassov, Michael A. Robichaux, Theodore G. Wensel
eNeuro 15 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0143-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0143-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
A Large Endoplasmic Reticulum-Resident Pool of TRPM1 in Retinal ON-Bipolar Cells
Melina A. Agosto, Ivan A. Anastassov, Michael A. Robichaux, Theodore G. Wensel
eNeuro 15 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0143-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0143-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • bipolar cell
  • protein trafficking
  • secretory pathway
  • TRPM1

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Robust representation and nonlinear spectral integration of harmonic stacks in layer 4 of mouse primary auditory cortex
  • Changes in Palatability Processing across the Estrous Cycle Are Modulated by Hypothalamic Estradiol Signaling
  • Automatic, but not autonomous: Implicit adaptation is modulated by goal-directed attentional demands
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.