Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Commentary, Cognition and Behavior

Inverted Encoding Models Assay Population-Level Stimulus Representations, Not Single-Unit Neural Tuning

Thomas C. Sprague, Kirsten C. S. Adam, Joshua J. Foster, Masih Rahmati, David W. Sutterer and Vy A. Vo
eNeuro 11 May 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0098-18.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0098-18.2018
Thomas C. Sprague
1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas C. Sprague
Kirsten C. S. Adam
2Department of Psychology and Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kirsten C. S. Adam
Joshua J. Foster
2Department of Psychology and Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joshua J. Foster
Masih Rahmati
1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Sutterer
2Department of Psychology and Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David W. Sutterer
Vy A. Vo
3Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vy A. Vo
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

Guidelines

As a forum for professional feedback, submissions of letters are open to all. You do not need to be a subscriber. To avoid redundancy, we urge you to read other people's letters before submitting your own. Name, current appointment, place of work, and email address are required to send a letter, and will be published with your review. We also require that you declare any competing financial interests. Unprofessional submissions will not be considered or responded to.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson{at}gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 3
May/June 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inverted Encoding Models Assay Population-Level Stimulus Representations, Not Single-Unit Neural Tuning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Inverted Encoding Models Assay Population-Level Stimulus Representations, Not Single-Unit Neural Tuning
Thomas C. Sprague, Kirsten C. S. Adam, Joshua J. Foster, Masih Rahmati, David W. Sutterer, Vy A. Vo
eNeuro 11 May 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0098-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0098-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Inverted Encoding Models Assay Population-Level Stimulus Representations, Not Single-Unit Neural Tuning
Thomas C. Sprague, Kirsten C. S. Adam, Joshua J. Foster, Masih Rahmati, David W. Sutterer, Vy A. Vo
eNeuro 11 May 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0098-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0098-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Significance Statement
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cognitive Vision
  • computational neuroimaging
  • fMRI
  • inverted encoding model

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Commentary

  • Learning Environments and Brain Health: A Neuroeducational Perspective
  • What Is My Neuron Doing? Commentary on Huang et al. (2026)
  • Experimental Designs for Preclinical Neuroscience Experiments: Part 2—Blocking and Blocked Designs
Show more Commentary

Cognition and Behavior

  • Environmental Enrichment Attenuates Fentanyl-Seeking Behavior and Protects Against Stress-Induced Reinstatement in Both Male and Female Rats
  • Dopamine and calcium dynamics in the nucleus accumbens core during food seeking
  • Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Pre-speech Semantic Category Decoding: An intracranial EEG Study.
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Commentaries
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.