Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts

eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Cognition and Behavior

RNA from Trained Aplysia Can Induce an Epigenetic Engram for Long-Term Sensitization in Untrained Aplysia

Alexis Bédécarrats, Shanping Chen, Kaycey Pearce, Diancai Cai and David L. Glanzman
eNeuro 14 May 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0038-18.2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0038-18.2018
Alexis Bédécarrats
1Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexis Bédécarrats
Shanping Chen
1Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaycey Pearce
1Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diancai Cai
1Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David L. Glanzman
1Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
2Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
3Integrative Center for Learning and Memory, Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    RNA extracted from sensitization-trained donor animals induces long-term enhancement of the SWR in recipient Aplysia. A, Experimental protocol for inducing LTS in the donor animals. B, Mean posttest duration of the SWR in the untrained control (1.2 ± 0.1 s, n = 31) and trained (56.4 ± 2.0 s, n = 34) groups. The trained group exhibited significant sensitization, as indicated by the comparison with control group (Mann–Whitney test, U = 496, p < 0.001). C, Experimental protocol for the RNA injection experiments. The first pretest occurred 2–3 h after the posttest for the behavioral training (A). D, Mean duration of the SWR measured at ∼24 h after the injection of RNA for the control RNA (5.4 ± 3.9 s, n = 7) and trained RNA (38.0 ± 4.6 s, n = 7) groups. The two groups differed significantly (U = 30, p < 0.003). Furthermore, Wilcoxon tests indicated that the difference between the pretest and posttest for the trained RNA group was significant (W = 28, p < 0.02), whereas it was not significant for the control RNA group (p > 0.2). The bar graphs in this and the following figures display means ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n.s., nonsignificant.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    DNA methylation is required for RNA-induced enhancement of the SWR. A, Experimental protocol for inducing sensitization in the second donor group. B, Mean posttest duration of the SWR (n = 38). The training produced sensitization (mean posttest SWR = 56.4 ± 1.4 s, and mean pretest SWR = 1.1 ± 0.1 s; W = 741, p < 0.001). C, Experimental protocol for testing the effect of DNMT inhibition on RNA-induced enhancement of the SWR. RG-108/vehicle was injected into animals 5–10 min after the RNA injection. D, Mean postinjection duration of the SWR in the RNA-Veh (n = 3) and RNA-RG (n = 7) groups. The mean duration of the SWR in the RNA-Veh group (35.7 ± 7.7 s) was significantly longer than that in the RNA-RG group (1.4 ± 0.3 s; U = 27, p < 0.02). Moreover, the posttest SWR was sensitized compared to the pretest reflex in the RNA-Veh group (paired t test, p < 0.05), but not in the RNA-RG group (p > 0.4).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Treatment with RNA from trained animals increases excitability in dissociated sensory neurons but not in dissociated motor neurons. A, Sample electrophysiological traces from excitability tests on sensory neurons. Scale bars: 20 mV, 0.25 s. B, Changes in the excitability of the sensory neurons induced by RNA/vehicle treatment. The mean change in evoked APs in each group was: vehicle = –17.29 ± 12.86% (n = 19); control RNA = –35.76 ± 19.88% (n = 16); and trained RNA = 56.66 ± 22.07% (n = 19). The group differences were significant (Kruskal–Wallis; H = 11.81, p < 0.04). Dunn’s post hoc tests indicated that the increased firing in the trained RNA group was greater than that in the vehicle group (q = 2.44, p < 0.05) and control RNA group (q = 3.25, p < 0.004), respectively. The difference between vehicle and control RNA groups was not significant (p > 0.9). C, Sample traces from tests of motor neuron excitability. Scale bars: 25 mV, 0.25 s. D, Summary of posttreatment changes in the excitability of motor neurons. The mean changes were: vehicle group = –29.28 ± 19.16% (n = 15); control RNA group = 5.278 ± 34.36% (n = 12); and trained RNA group = –1.136 ± 34.01% (n = 14). The group differences in excitability were insignificant (p > 0.7).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Exposure of in vitro sensorimotor synaptic connections to RNA from trained animals enhanced the strength of a subpopulation of synapses. A, Representative records of EPSPs evoked in motor neurons by a single presynaptic AP before and 24 h after the RNA/vehicle treatments. Scale bars: 5 mV, 0.1s. B, Box and whiskers plots showing the distribution of posttreatment changes in EPSP amplitude in the three experimental groups. The boxes delineate the second and third quartiles, the horizontal lines in the boxes represent the medians, and the vertical bars (whiskers) show the extent of the data spread. The crosses indicate the means, whereas individual data points are represented by circles. Mean posttreatment changes in EPSP amplitudes were: vehicle group = –23.38 ± 10.59% (n = 23); control RNA group = –21.32 ± 10.23% (n = 34); and trained RNA group = 22.71 ± 26.70% (n = 32). A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed no significant differences among the groups with respect to the mean changes in EPSP amplitude (p > 0.8). Note, however, that five of the 32 synapses treated with RNA from trained animals showed an increase of >150%, whereas none of the synapses treated with vehicle or RNA from control animals showed an increase of this magnitude. A Levene’s test confirmed that the three groups displayed significantly unequal variances (F(2,86) = 5.883, p < 0.005).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Statistical table

    Data structureType of testPower (α = 0.05)
    a (Fig. 1B)Non-normally distributedMann–Whitney testNot applicable
    b (Fig. 1D)Non-normally distributedMann–Whitney testNot applicable
    c (Fig. 1D)Non-normally distributedWilcoxon testNot applicable
    d (Fig. 1D)Non-normally distributedWilcoxon testNot applicable
    e (Fig. 2B)Non-normally distributedWilcoxon testNot applicable
    f (Fig. 2D)Non-normally distributedMann–Whitney testNot applicable
    g (Fig. 2D)Normally distributedPaired t test0.647
    h (Fig. 2D)Non-normally distributedWilcoxon testNot applicable
    i (Fig. 3B)Non-normally distributedKruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s testNot applicable
    j (Fig. 3D)Non-normally distributedKruskal–Wallis testNot applicable
    k (Fig. 4B)Non-normally distributedLevene’s testNot applicable
    l (Fig. 4B)Non-normally distributedKruskal–Wallis testNot applicable
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 3
May/June 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
RNA from Trained Aplysia Can Induce an Epigenetic Engram for Long-Term Sensitization in Untrained Aplysia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
RNA from Trained Aplysia Can Induce an Epigenetic Engram for Long-Term Sensitization in Untrained Aplysia
Alexis Bédécarrats, Shanping Chen, Kaycey Pearce, Diancai Cai, David L. Glanzman
eNeuro 14 May 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0038-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0038-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
RNA from Trained Aplysia Can Induce an Epigenetic Engram for Long-Term Sensitization in Untrained Aplysia
Alexis Bédécarrats, Shanping Chen, Kaycey Pearce, Diancai Cai, David L. Glanzman
eNeuro 14 May 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0038-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0038-18.2018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Aplysia
  • epigenetics
  • learning and memory
  • Memory Transfer
  • RNA
  • sensitization

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Noradrenergic suppression of persistent firing in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells through cAMP-PKA pathway
  • A role for STOML3 in olfactory sensory transduction
  • Interlimb transfer of reach adaptation does not require an intact corpus callosum:Evidence from patients with callosal lesions and agenesis
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • The Contribution of Environmental Enrichment to Phenotypic Variation in Mice and Rats
  • Suppress me if you can: Neurofeedback of the Readiness Potential
  • Perceptual learning with complex objects: A comparison between full-practice training and memory reactivation
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.