Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleMethods/New Tools, Novel Tools and Methods

Using Automated Live Cell Imaging to Reveal Early Changes during Human Motor Neuron Degeneration

Hye Young Shin, Kathleen L. Pfaff, Lance S. Davidow, Chicheng Sun, Takayuki Uozumi, Fumiki Yanagawa, Yoichi Yamazaki, Yasujiro Kiyota and Lee L. Rubin
eNeuro 18 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0001-18.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0001-18.2018
Hye Young Shin
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hye Young Shin
Kathleen L. Pfaff
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lance S. Davidow
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lance S. Davidow
Chicheng Sun
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chicheng Sun
Takayuki Uozumi
2Healthcare Business Unit, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fumiki Yanagawa
2Healthcare Business Unit, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoichi Yamazaki
2Healthcare Business Unit, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasujiro Kiyota
2Healthcare Business Unit, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yasujiro Kiyota
Lee L. Rubin
1Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lee L. Rubin
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Movies
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Identifying morphologic changes that precede neuronal death using computational quantitation. A, Representative BioStation CT images of human Islet1::GFP-positive MNs in basal (TF+) and withdrawal (TF–) conditions at key experimental time points: day 1 (1 day after TF withdrawal), day 6, and day 10 of imaging (scale bar = 40 µm). B–E, Time series plots comparing the populations of Islet1::GFP MNs in TF+ (green) and TF– (magenta) conditions. Quantitation was done at each time point for the number (#) of MNs (B), neurite length per cell (C), number of nodes per cell (D), and cell body size per cell (E). The arrow indicates time of TF withdrawal (day 1). The average fold change relative to day 0 for all of the measured parameters is shown. A significant different between TF+ and TF– over time was found by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA after Bonferroni correction in the number of MNs (p < 0.001, F = 13.63, DFn = 1; B), neurite length per cell (p < 0.01, F = 5.27, DFn = 1; C), number of nodes per cell (p < 0.001, F = 30.57, DFn = 1; D) and cell body size per cell (p < 0.001, F = 11.54, DFn = 1; E), and significant differences between TF+ and TF– were observed at the end point by Bonferroni post-tests: **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. Data presented as mean + SEM. (n = 4 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates.) F, Comparison of the effect magnitudes between TF+ and TF– for number of MNs (B) and number of nodes per cell (D) at day 12. Data presented as mean + SEM. *, p < 0.05 by t test (n = 4 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). G, Extracted time series data showing fold change measurements in features between day 1 and day 12. Data presented as mean + SEM. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 by t test (n = 4 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Measuring MN rescue responses following TF addback or kenpaullone treatment. A, Experimental design of TF withdrawal and addback imaging assays. For all experiments, TF withdrawal began 1 day after the start of imaging defined as day 0. For TF addback, the TFs- BDNF, GDNF, and CNTF– were reinstated to the culture media after 6, 7, or 8 days of TF withdrawal. B, Representative images of Islet1::GFP MNs at day 1, 6, and 11 in TF+, TF addback at day 6, and TF–. C, Fold change in number (#) of MNs between day 6 and day 14 following TF addback at day 6, 7, or 8. All data presented as mean + SEM. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 by t test; all compared to TF– conditions (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). D, E, Time series plots depicting neurite length (D) and number of nodes per cell (E) show the MN population behavior in TF– and TF addback conditions. Key experimental time points are denoted with arrows: the start of TF withdrawal (red), day 6 addback (dark blue), day 7 addback (light blue), and day 8 addback (orange). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant differences in neurite length per cell (p < 0.001, F = 6.555, DFn = 4; D) and number of nodes (p < 0.05, F = 3.356, DFn = 4; E) over time under the different conditions. Subsequent Bonferroni post tests indicated TF addback at day 6, 7, and 8 increased neurite length per cell (D) and the number of nodes (E) per cell compared to TF– at the end point. All data presented as mean + SEM. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, all compared to TF– conditions (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). F, Experimental design of imaging assays kenpaullone addition to cells undergoing TF withdrawal. Analysis window between day 6 and day 14 was used for both evaluation of survival effect (G) and temporal quantitation of morphometric parameters (H, I). G, Fold change in # of MNs between day 0 and day 14 of kenpaullone treatment. All data presented as mean + SEM. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 by t test; all compared to TF– conditions (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). H, I, Time series plots depicting neurite length (H) and number of nodes per cell (I) after kenpaullone treatment. Kenpaullone (light and dark purple) was administered from the start of TF withdrawal (magenta) as denoted with arrows. All data presented as mean + SEM. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, all compared to TF– conditions (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Classifying MNs according to their number of nodes. A, Classification of the heterogeneous MN population according to their number of nodes (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4+ nodes) determines the class assignment (class A, B, C) for each MN. B, C, A stacked temporal area plot displaying the number of MNs with 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4+ nodes, quantified at each time point throughout the imaging experiment. In this stacked area graph, the height of each colored region on the y-axis indicates the number of MNs in each number of nodes category. (B), After the first few days in TF+, the total number of MNs remains relatively constant. MNs mature over time and eventually MNs with 4+ nodes become the majority of the population. (C), In TF–, the total number of MNs gradually decreases over time and the MN population comprises a large percentage of cells with 2 or 3 nodes and relatively fewer neurons with 4 or more nodes. The magenta arrow indicates the time of TF withdrawal. D, A histogram of fold change (relative to day 0) in the number of MNs with 4 or more nodes in the TF+ and TF– conditions respectively. During the time period, the number of MNs with 4 or more nodes in TF+ and TF– conditions becomes increasingly different (p < 0.05, F = 3.949, DFn = 2 by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction). All data presented as mean + SEM. *, p < 0.05. (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates.)

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    A Single-cell tracking algorithm to measure the lifespan of MNs. A, Representative images of cell tracking. Three MNs distinguished with different colors (green, purple, orange) were tracked by time lapse imaging using CL-Quant software The software was able to assign individual identities to two cells that were overlapping (middle image) using cell body size and position information collected over time. B, Schematic diagram of the class A hours measurement. Class A MNs were defined at the beginning of the imaging period and then tracked. The same analysis window (between day 6 and day 14) was used for all experiments. Using single-cell tracking with a mask for node number, the lifespan hours of class A MNs were measured and averaged during the selected analysis window. For each MN, class A hours ended when class A MNs changed to class B or C. C, D, Normalized class A hours (relative to TF+) for TF addback (C) and kenpaullone (D). Table 1 lists the number of tracked MNs for the TF addback experiments, and Table 2 provides the numbers of tracked MNs for the kenpaullone experiments. Data presented as mean + SEM. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 by t test all compared to TF– (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Tracking cell class transitions of individual MNs in TF withdrawal, TF addback, and kenpaullone conditions. Cells were categorized as either class A or class B MNs as shown in Fig. 3A and then individually tracked to determine if they remained in the same class at the end of the analysis window. Table 1 details the class transitions for all tracked MNs in the TF addback experiments, while Table 2 provides this information for the kenpaullone experiments. A, MNs identified as class A on day 6 were tracked until day 14 in each treatment condition and were categorized according to their class transition in a stacked histogram (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). B, Stacked histogram of class transitions from day 6 to day 14 of class B MNs in each treatment condition (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). C, The ratio of class A to A MNs (from day 6 to day 14) in each different treatment condition, relative to TF+ control, quantifies the maintenance of class A MNs. TF addback at day 6 shows a significant rescue effect, while TF addback at day 7 or 8 is less effective. Data presented as mean + SEM. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 by t test; all compared to TF– (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). D, The ratio of class B to A MNs (from day 6 to day 14) in the different treatment conditions relative to TF+ quantifies the rescue of class B MNs to class A MNs. Data presented as mean + SEM. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 by t test; all compared to TF– (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). E, Maintenance of class A to A MNs from day 0 to day 14 in different treatment conditions relative to TF+. Kenpaullone significantly maintained class A MNs as class A compared to TF withdrawal. Data presented as mean + SEM. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 by t test; all compared with TF– conditions (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates). F, Changes in the ratio of class B to A MNs from day 0 to day 14. Kenpaullone did not rescue many class B MNs to class A. Data presented as mean + SEM. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 by t test; all compared with TF– conditions (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Characterization of key morphologic features of rescuable class B MNs using reverse tracking. A, B, Representative single cell analysis extracted using CL-Quant. Graphs show tracked number of nodes (A) and cell body size (B) of two individual MNs over time. In this plot, both MN #1 and MN #2 became class B MNs after TF withdrawal at day 6. MN #1 recovered to class A following day 6 of TF addback. C, D, Common features of rescuable class B MNs at day 6, 7 and 8. At the time point immediately before TF addback, class B MNs that could develop into class A MNs had more nodes (C) and a larger cell body size (D) compared to class B MNs that could not regrow neurites. Data presented as mean + SEM. ***, p < 0.001 by t test; all compared with TF–conditions (n = 5 biological replicate experiments, each with three technical replicates).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Movies
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Numbers of tracked MNs to evaluate cell class transitions following TF addback (day 6–14)

    Outcome of fate transitionOutcome of fate transition
    ConditionsTotal tracked # of MNsTracked # of Class A MNsClass A to AClass A to BClass A to CTracked # of Class B MNsClass B to AClass B to BClass B to C
    TF+110.9 ± 32.0583.33 ± 30.1662.27 ± 22.072.267 ± 1.02418.80 ± 7.24027.57 ± 4.5409.533 ± 2.4213.300 ± 0.963814.73 ± 2.379
    TF addback at day 693.60 ± 29.3658.33 ± 24.6840.17 ± 16.362.033 ± 1.31116.13 ± 7.28535.27 ± 6.95410.43 ± 2.8343.167 ± 0.785321.67 ± 4.001
    TF addback at day 797.97 ± 28.0946.92 ± 16.2526.56 ± 11.811.333 ± 0.516419.03 ± 4.25444.67 ± 11.9033.90 ± 17.072.100 ± 0.942221.27 ± 6.517
    TF addback at day 8110.3 ± 31.5157.27 ± 24.4633.90 ± 17.072.100 ± 0.942221.27 ± 6.51755.54 ± 11.6025.83 ± 13.035.600 ± 1.43124.43 ± 6.128
    TF–101.6 ± 30.1155.87 ± 19.5225.83 ± 13.035.600 ± 1.43124.43 ± 6.12845.73 ± 12.475.267 ± 2.12510.70 ± 4.80329.77 ± 6.136
    • Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Numbers of tracked MNs to evaluate cell class transitions during kenpaullone treatment (day 0–14)

    Outcome of fate transitionOutcome of fate transition
    ConditionsTotal tracked # of MNsTracked # of Class A MNsClass A to AClass A to BClass A to CTracked # of Class B MNsClass B to AClass B to BClass B to C
    TF+86.20 ± 17.0842.47 ± 13.8627.47 ± 10.070.6000 ± 0.244914.40 ± 4.12843.73 ± 6.32214.87 ± 4.1211.733 ± 0.590727.13 ± 3.023
    TF+/Ken 5uM80.27 ± 19.0141.07 ± 15.5227.60 ± 11.260.7333 ± 0.339912.73 ± 4.15339.20 ± 6.53817.00 ± 4.7912.333 ± 0.505519.87 ± 2.277
    TF–/Ken 2.5uM98.27 ± 21.2342.80 ± 16.0521.40 ± 8.3622.400 ± 0.878119.00 ± 7.55155.47 ± 10.4615.07 ± 4.9937.000 ± 1.62333.40 ± 5.499
    TF–/Ken 5uM96.87 ± 16.1638.27 ± 11.9318.67 ± 5.5441.867 ± 0.719617.73 ± 5.74358.60 ± 12.2111.80 ± 4.1967.200 ± 2.56039.60 ± 7.318
    TF–92.53 ± 19.2542.47 ± 14.9011.13 ± 3.8684.467 ± 1.69826.87 ± 9.44350.07 ± 6.9986.867 ± 1.6954.333 ± 1.03838.87 ± 5.904
    • Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5).

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Summary of statistical analyses

    LocationDescriptionData structureType of testStatistical value
    aFig. 1B–ENormal (Gaussian distribution) at the end point; number (n) of biological experiments = 4 with three technical replicatesTwo-way repeated-measures ANOVA after Bonferroni correctionNumber (#) of MNs : p < 0.001, F = 13.63, DFn = 1; Neurite length per cell: p < 0.01, F = 5.27, DFn = 1; # of Nodes per cell : p < 0.001, F= 30.57, DFn = 1; Cell body size per cell : p < 0.001, F = 11.54, DFn = 1
    Unpaired two-tailed t-test at the end point# of MNs : p < 0.001; Neurite length per cell: p < 0.01; # of Nodes per cell : p < 0.001; Cell body size per cell : p < 0.001
    bFig. 1FNormal, n = 4Unpaired two-tailed t-testp < 0.05
    cFig. 1GNormal, n = 4Unpaired two-tailed t-test# of MNs: p < 0.01, Neurite length per cell: p < 0.05; # of Nodes per cell: p < 0.0001, Cell body size: p < 0.01
    d Fig. 2CNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF+: p < 0.001, TF addback at day 6: p < 0.05
    e Fig. 2D, ENormal at the end point; n = 5Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA after Bonferroni correctionNeurite length per cell: p < 0.01, F = 6.555, DFn = 4; # of Nodes per cell: p < 0.05, F = 3.356, DFn = 4
    Unpaired two-tailed t-test at the end pointNeurite length per cell: TF addback at day 6, day 7, and day 8: p < 0.001, respectively; # of Nodes per cell: TF addback at day 6, day 7: p < 0.001; TF addback at day 8: p < 0.01
    f Fig. 2GNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF+ and TF+/Ken 5µM: p < 0.001; TF–/2.5µM and TF–/5µM: p < 0.05
    g Fig. 2H, INormal at the end point; n = 5Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA after Bonferroni correctionNeurite length per cell: p < 0.05, F = 4.01, DFn = 4; # of Nodes per cell: not significant
    Unpaired two-tailed t-test at the end pointNeurite length per cell: TF+ and TF+/Ken 5µM: p < 0.001; # of Nodes per cell: TF+: p < 0.001,; TF+/Ken5 µM: p < 0.01
    h Fig. 3DNormal at the end point; n = 5Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA correction after Bonferroni correctionFold change of MNs with 4 or more nodes :p < 0.05, F = 3.949, DFn = 2
    Unpaired two-tailed t-test at the end pointp < 0.05
    i Fig. 4CNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF+: p < 0.001, TF addback at day 6: p < 0.001
    j Fig. 4DNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF+: p < 0.01, TF+/Ken 5 µM: p < 0.01
    k Fig. 5CNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF+: p < 0.001, TF addback at day 6: p < 0.001, TF addback at day 7: p < 0.05, addback at day 8: p < 0.05,
    l Fig. 5DNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF+: p < 0.001, TF addback at day6: p < 0.001,; TF addback at day7: p < 0.05, addback at day8: p < 0.05
    m Fig. 5ENormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF+: p < 0.001, TF+/Ken 5 µM: p < 0.001,; TF–/Ken 2.5 µM: p < 0.01, TF–/Ken 5µM: p < 0.01
    n Fig. 5FNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF+: p < 0.01, TF+/Ken 5 µM: p < 0.01
    o Fig. 6CNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF addback at day 6, day 7, and day 8: p < 0.001, respectively
    p Fig. 6DNormal, n = 5Unpaired two-tailed t-testTF addback at day 6, day 7, and day 8: p < 0.001, respectively

Movies

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Video 1.

    Representative video of H9-Islet1::GFP MN, captured every 6 hours for 14 days. Single-cell tracking software successfully identifies and tracks individual MNs. Green dot indicates center of the cell body. The red line maps the MN’s trajectory over time.

  • Video 2.

    Morphometric single-cell tracking analysis tracks neurite length (yellow), number of nodes (magenta), and cell body size (green) of MN over time. Because of the increasing complexity of the neuritic network, the number of nodes metric is better than neurite length for tracking at the single-cell level. Images were captured every 6 hours for 14 days.

  • Video 3.

    Single-cell tracking analysis of neurite length (yellow), number of nodes (magenta), and cell body size (green) of MN in four experimental conditions: TF (A), TF addback at day 6 (B), 5 µm kenpaullone and TF withdrawal (C), and TF withdrawal (D). TF was withdrawn at day 1 (1 day after live imaging initiation), and TF was added at day 6 (C), and 5 μm kenpaullone was added during the entire period in which MNs were maintained in the absence of TF. Images were captured every 6 hours for 14 days. In TF (A), individual MNs increased neurite length and number of nodes, and TF addback at day 6 (B) rescues both neurite length and number of nodes. Kenpaullone (C) is less protective compared to TF addback (B). In TF withdrawal (D), the neurites retract and the cell body size and number of nodes decrease.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 3
May/June 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Using Automated Live Cell Imaging to Reveal Early Changes during Human Motor Neuron Degeneration
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Using Automated Live Cell Imaging to Reveal Early Changes during Human Motor Neuron Degeneration
Hye Young Shin, Kathleen L. Pfaff, Lance S. Davidow, Chicheng Sun, Takayuki Uozumi, Fumiki Yanagawa, Yoichi Yamazaki, Yasujiro Kiyota, Lee L. Rubin
eNeuro 18 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0001-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0001-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Using Automated Live Cell Imaging to Reveal Early Changes during Human Motor Neuron Degeneration
Hye Young Shin, Kathleen L. Pfaff, Lance S. Davidow, Chicheng Sun, Takayuki Uozumi, Fumiki Yanagawa, Yoichi Yamazaki, Yasujiro Kiyota, Lee L. Rubin
eNeuro 18 June 2018, 5 (3) ENEURO.0001-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0001-18.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Automated live time-lapse imaging instrument
  • heterogeneity
  • live cell time-lapse imaging
  • morphometric analysis
  • single cell tracking

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Methods/New Tools

  • Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
  • A Toolbox of Criteria for Distinguishing Cajal–Retzius Cells from Other Neuronal Types in the Postnatal Mouse Hippocampus
  • Assessment of Spontaneous Neuronal Activity In Vitro Using Multi-Well Multi-Electrode Arrays: Implications for Assay Development
Show more Methods/New Tools

Novel Tools and Methods

  • Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in Mouse Brain
  • A Toolbox of Criteria for Distinguishing Cajal–Retzius Cells from Other Neuronal Types in the Postnatal Mouse Hippocampus
  • Assessment of Spontaneous Neuronal Activity In Vitro Using Multi-Well Multi-Electrode Arrays: Implications for Assay Development
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.