Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Editorial

Editorial: Introducing Registered Reports

Christophe Bernard
eNeuro 14 March 2018, 5 (2) ENEURO.0089-18.2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0089-18.2018
Christophe Bernard
Roles: Editor-in-Chief
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christophe Bernard
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The way we do science is rather stereotyped. We have hypotheses to test, and we plan the experiments, sometimes a long time ahead, to test these hypotheses. Writing a grant proposal is a typical example: we give a detailed plan of what we are going to do in the coming years. Of course, we never know how a project will evolve, and deviations from the original plan are commonplace, as milestones may not be reached. But in many instances, the hypothesis is such that deviations rarely occur. Preclinical studies are a prototypical example: we test whether a drug can treat a particular disorder. The experimental plan is straightforward. Unavoidably, many projects lead to dead ends, negative results, etc.

Publishing such negative results is important for the advancement of science, as it saves time and money for labs tempted to test the same hypotheses, and allows researchers to move on to testing other hypotheses. This is the reason why the Negative Results category of papers exists at eNeuro.

There is another way to deal with this issue: Registered Reports, a research publishing format started by the Center for Open Science. The principle is simple. You can submit a text that contains a short introduction to provide the background and why testing this hypothesis is important, as well as a detailed Materials and Methods section, to show how you are going to test the hypothesis. This text is then reviewed to evaluate the validity of the hypothesis and whether the experimental plan addresses the raised questions. If approved, the resulting paper (after the experiment is completed) can be accepted whatever the results will be, i.e., positive or negative.

This pre-evaluation has two main advantages:

  1. It provides useful feedback to authors before they start performing the experiments. In that way, the project can be greatly improved. This ultimately saves time and money. I would personally enjoy feedback from peers at very early stages of a project, as one cannot always see potential caveats, or better ways to demonstrate what we want to show. External advice is always important.

  2. It guarantees publication, again saving time, as the study is already provisionally accepted.

I am pleased to announce eNeuro will launch Registered Reports on March 14, 2018. How will it work? As mentioned above, submit the Introduction and the detailed Materials and Methods section. This is reviewed by a reviewing editor and two reviewers and follows a procedure similar to a regular paper, i.e., reviewers may accept it as is, request a revision, or reject it.

If the Registered Report is accepted, then the authors complete the study and submit the full paper containing the usual sections. The paper goes through expedited reviewing and will be accepted whatever the results are, provided that there is no deviation from the original plan. Deviations from the provisionally approved methodology are acceptable, but then the paper will go through a regular evaluation process.

It is important to note that having the paper accepted as a Registered Report at eNeuro does not bind the authors to eNeuro. After finishing the experimental work, authors are free to submit the paper anywhere. However, if a Registered Report is withdrawn after provisional acceptance, eNeuro will publish a notice of this withdrawal, to indicate that the study had been evaluated by us, this is only fair.

From personal experience, I know that it is sometimes impossible to predict how a project will exactly evolve in time. This is the nature of science. However, in some instances, the experimental plan can be straightforward, like for preclinical studies. Therefore, we will first limit Registered Reports to preclinical studies designed to test the effect of a treatment. However, if you think that your nonclinical experimental plan will not deviate over time, you can contact me about it, I would be happy to consider any type of study in the Registered Report category.

eNeuro: always striving to help the community

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 2
March/April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editorial: Introducing Registered Reports
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Editorial: Introducing Registered Reports
Christophe Bernard
eNeuro 14 March 2018, 5 (2) ENEURO.0089-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0089-18.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Editorial: Introducing Registered Reports
Christophe Bernard
eNeuro 14 March 2018, 5 (2) ENEURO.0089-18.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0089-18.2018
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Stop Reproducing the Reproducibility Crisis
  • Everything You Always Wanted to Say about Science (But Were Afraid to Publish)
  • Doing Socially Responsible Science in the Age of Selfies and Immediacy
Show more Editorial

Subjects

  • Editorials

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.