Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Cognition and Behavior

Collateral Projections Innervate the Mammillary Bodies and Retrosplenial Cortex: A New Category of Hippocampal Cells

Lisa Kinnavane, Seralynne D. Vann, Andrew J. D. Nelson, Shane M. O’Mara and John P. Aggleton
eNeuro 26 February 2018, 5 (1) ENEURO.0383-17.2018; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0383-17.2018
Lisa Kinnavane
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lisa Kinnavane
Seralynne D. Vann
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Seralynne D. Vann
Andrew J. D. Nelson
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew J. D. Nelson
Shane M. O’Mara
2Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin, D2, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John P. Aggleton
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John P. Aggleton
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Extended Data
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Subicular neurons collateralize to innervate the RSP and MBs. A, Coronal photomicrographs of dorsal subiculum in a rat following FB injections in RSP and CTB in the MBs with pink double-labeled cells in the overlay panel indicating neurons that collateralize to both regions. Proximal-distal regions (R1–R4) were divisions used for subsequent quantification. B, Coronal section showing FB injection into RSP. C, Coronal section showing CTB injection into MBs. D, Coronal dorsal subiculum section after injections of FB into the RSP and FluoroGold into the MBs. The open arrowhead points to a single-labeled neuron projecting to MB, the closed arrowhead to single-labeled neuron projecting to RSP, the open diamonds indicate double-labeled neurons. CA1, hippocampal field CA1; LMB, lateral mammillary nucleus; MMB, medial mammillary nucleus; Rga and Rgb, granular RSP, subdivisions a and b, respectively (collectively, area 29); Rdg, dysgranular RSP (area 30). Scale bars: 500 µm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Quantification of extent and location of collateralizing neurons in dorsal subiculum. Histogram illustrates the percentage of subiculum neurons projecting to RSP that colabel with MB tracer. For this analysis, dorsal subiculum was divided by proximal-distal (R1–R4) and AP locations (cell counts are presented in Extended Data Fig. 2-1). Photomicrographs depict dorsal subiculum (right hemisphere) at five AP levels (numbers indicate distance from bregma in millimeters), the borders are color coded to match the corresponding bars in the histogram. The photomicrographs show pink double-labeled cells that innervate both sites, red neurons projecting to MB, and blue neurons projecting to RSP. Additional, higher magnification panels show labeling in more detail; FB (blue) fills the cytoplasm while retrogradely transported CTB (red) remains in vesicles and so appears granular. The open arrowhead marks a single-labeled neuron projecting to MB, the closed arrowhead marks a single-labeled neuron projecting to RSP, the open diamonds indicate double-labeled neurons. Scale bar: 500 µm unless otherwise specified.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Characterization of collateral-collateral transport. A1, Photomicrograph of collateral-collateral transport following a CTB injection into the MBs. The section shows CTB terminal label in Layers II and III of granular RSP (area 29). The Nissl-stained overlay (A2) confirms the abrupt border with dysgranular cortex (area 30). B, Coronal section showing terminal label in dorsal pars lateralis (MMBl) and pars medianus (MMBmed) of the medial mammillary nucleus following a retrosplenial CTB injection. Note, pia artifact has been removed. C, Coronal section showing dense terminal label in the anterior thalamic nuclei. D, Pattern of both retrograde and light terminal label in the entorhinal cortex after a CTB injection into the MBs. Boxes, D2, and D3 correspond to higher magnification images of medial and lateral entorhinal cortex, respectively. E, Photomicrograph of dorsal subiculum following injection of an anterograde tracer (BDA). F, Coronal section of RSP showing pattern of BDA anterograde transport from dorsal subiculum. G, Coronal section from same level of RSP as depicted in F, illustrating pattern of CTB terminal label following CTB injection in MBs. AD, anterodorsal thalamic nucleus; AM, anteromedial thalamic nucleus; AV, anteroventral thalamic nucleus; LMB, lateral mammillary nucleus; MMBl, medial MB, pars lateralis; MMBm, medial MB, pars medialis. Scale bars: 500 µm unless otherwise specified.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Absence of collateral-collateral transport to RSP following a CTB injection into the MBs combined with lesion involving the postcommissural descending fornix. A, B, Nissl-stained sections, 1.56 mm behind bregma (according to Paxinos and Watson, 2005), showing postcommissural fornix lesion (A) and intact case (B), respectively. C, Coronal photomicrograph showing the very limited retrograde label in proximal dorsal subiculum after a postcommissural fornix lesion. D, Typical appearance of retrograde label in the dorsal subiculum in an intact case (CTB in MBs). E, Lack of terminal label in the RSP after postcommissural fornix lesion. The inset provides a comparison with an intact case. F, G, Retrogradely labeled neurons in Gudden’s ventral tegmental nucleus when the postcommissural descending fornix is lesioned (F) or intact (G) Note, while the label in F appears more restricted, it is denser. 3V, 3rd ventricle; opt, optic nerve. Scale bars: 500 µm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Cross-species comparisons. A, Coronal section showing CTB injection into mouse MBs. B, Coronal section showing FB injection into mouse RSP. C, Coronal photomicrograph of dorsal subiculum. The numerous double-labeled (pink) cells innervate both sites. Inset depicts higher magnification of indicated region. The open arrowhead points to a single-labeled neuron projecting to MB, the closed arrowhead to a single-labeled neuron projecting to RSP, the open diamonds indicate double-labeled neurons. Associated cell counts are presented in Extended Data Figure 5-1. D1, Red terminal label in the granular RSP (area 29) from collateral-collateral transport, alongside scattered retrogradely labeled cells in RSP and the indusium griseum (IG). D2, A Nissl-stained overlay of section D1 shows the border between area 29 and area 30. The label is concentrated in deep Layer II and Layer III of area 29. IG, indusium griseum; LMB, lateral MBs; MMB, medial MBs; PM, premammillary nucleus. Scale bar: 500 µm unless otherwise specified.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Neurochemical characterization of collateral-collateral terminals. A1, Combined immunohistochemical signal for VGluT2 matching the distribution of CTB terminal label localized in superficial area 29. A2 shows at greater magnification the separate CTB and VGluT2 label, with the overlay showing colocalization within Layers II and III of area 29. B1, Combined immunohistochemical signal for neurotensin (NT) matching the distribution of CTB terminal label localized in superficial area 29. B2 shows at greater magnification the separate CTB and NT label, with the overlay showing colocalization within Layers II and III of area 29. Scale bar: 500 µm unless otherwise specified. Note, pia artifact has been removed. Neurochemicals that did not colocalize with the CTB-positive terminals are shown in Extended Data Figure 6-1.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Schematic depictions of described hippocampal network connectivity. A, Ipsilateral and crossed collaterals from the subiculum reach the MBs and RSP (area 29). Note, the subiculum projections to area 29 remain ipsilateral while collaterals to MB can remain ipsilateral or cross hemispheres. B, Updated hippocampal-limbic network (Papez circuit) showing the ventral (subcortical), dorsal (cingulate), and new “collateral” routes. ATN, anterior thalamic nuclei; MTT, mammillothalamic tract.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Extended Data Figure 2-1

    Numbers of CTB- and FB-positive cells within different proximal-distal positions (R1–R4) of the dorsal and intermediate subiculum of the rat, including the number of double-labelled cells. The case numbers and hemisphere of cell counts (R or L) are shown, along with the percentage of subicular cells projecting to the RSP that are double labelled. Download Figure 2-1, DOCX file.

  • Extended Data Figure 5-1

    Numbers of CTB- and FB-positive cells within of the dorsal and intermediate subiculum of the mouse, including the number of double-labelled cells. The case numbers and hemisphere of cell counts (R or L) are shown, along with the percentage of subicular cells projecting to the RSP that are double labelled. Download Figure 5-1, DOCX file.

  • Extended Data Figure 6-1

    Series of coronal immunofluorescence images at the level of the RSP in an animal with a CTB injection in the MBs. Left column, Green immunofluorescent label associated with antibodies for VGluT1, GAD67, PV, calretinin (CR), calbindin (CB), and cholecystokinin (CCK). Middle column, CTB terminal label in the RSP (area 29, Layers II and III) highlighting the collateralizing subiculum projections that were present in the same section as depicted in the left column. Right column, The section overlay shows how the distribution of these neurochemicals do not match the termination sites of the collateral projections from the subiculum to area 29. Scale bar: 500 µm. Download Figure 6-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 1
January/February 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Collateral Projections Innervate the Mammillary Bodies and Retrosplenial Cortex: A New Category of Hippocampal Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Collateral Projections Innervate the Mammillary Bodies and Retrosplenial Cortex: A New Category of Hippocampal Cells
Lisa Kinnavane, Seralynne D. Vann, Andrew J. D. Nelson, Shane M. O’Mara, John P. Aggleton
eNeuro 26 February 2018, 5 (1) ENEURO.0383-17.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0383-17.2018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Collateral Projections Innervate the Mammillary Bodies and Retrosplenial Cortex: A New Category of Hippocampal Cells
Lisa Kinnavane, Seralynne D. Vann, Andrew J. D. Nelson, Shane M. O’Mara, John P. Aggleton
eNeuro 26 February 2018, 5 (1) ENEURO.0383-17.2018; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0383-17.2018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • anterior thalamic nuclei
  • cingulate cortex
  • episodic memory
  • fornix
  • subiculum

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Transformed visual working memory representations in human occipitotemporal and posterior parietal cortices
  • Neural Speech-Tracking During Selective Attention: A Spatially Realistic Audiovisual Study
  • Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Encodes the Trace Period during Appetitive Pavlovian Conditioning
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.