Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Long-Term Visual Training Increases Visual Acuity and Long-Term Monocular Deprivation Promotes Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Standard Cage-Raised Mice

Leon Hosang, Rashad Yusifov and Siegrid Löwel
eNeuro 2 January 2018, 5 (1) ENEURO.0289-17.2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0289-17.2017
Leon Hosang
1Department of Systems Neuroscience, J.F.B. Institut für Zoologie und Anthropologie, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, D-37075, Germany
2Göttingen Graduate School of Neurosciences, Biophysics and Molecular Biosciences (GGNB), Göttingen, D-37077, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rashad Yusifov
1Department of Systems Neuroscience, J.F.B. Institut für Zoologie und Anthropologie, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, D-37075, Germany
2Göttingen Graduate School of Neurosciences, Biophysics and Molecular Biosciences (GGNB), Göttingen, D-37077, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siegrid Löwel
1Department of Systems Neuroscience, J.F.B. Institut für Zoologie und Anthropologie, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, D-37075, Germany
3Sensory Collaborative Research Center 889, University of Göttingen, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Siegrid Löwel
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Movies
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Scheme of the experimental design. Two independent cohorts of mice were trained daily in the visual water task (VWT) until reaching binocular visual acuity (VA) based on established protocols (Prusky et al., 2000b, 2004). At the day of standard VA assessment, the two groups were also tested in the virtual-reality optomotor (OPT) system (optomotry) to determine the spatial frequency threshold of the OPT response (standard OPT threshold). One of the cohorts then obtained monocular deprivation (MD). Both cohorts were continued to be trained in the VWT. The monocular VA and OPT threshold of the VWT/MD group (during MD) was again determined after reaching the criterion (see Materials and Methods). In about half of the mice of the VWT/MD group, the MD was reopened and mice were continued to be trained daily in the VWT (VWT/MD-reopening). The binocular long-term VA and OPT threshold of both the VWT/no-MD and VWT/MD-reopening group was again tested after a comparable training time (see Materials and Methods). Instead of reopening the MD, optical imaging of intrinsic signals (OI) was performed with the other half of the deprived group (VWT/MD-OI). For comparison, a cohort of mice that had been deprived for a comparably long time but not VWT-trained was imaged (SC/MD-OI). As a control for the long-term trained VWT/MD group, we used the VWT/no-MD group after finishing the VWT (VWT/no-MD-OI). Likewise, we also tested an age-matched nondeprived, SC-housed cohort (SC/no-MD-OI).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Extended VWT training strongly increased mouse VA. Mice were initially trained in the VWT to discriminate a vertical, low spatial frequency sine wave grating from isoluminant gray. Standard VA was determined after 18 ± 3 d (545 ± 88 trials) of VWT training; after a total of 66 ± 7 d (1987 ± 207 trials), long-term VA was determined. A, VA of an animal in cyc/deg plotted against total trials/training days of VWT-experience. B, Average VA-curve of the VWT/no-MD group (n = 5, mean ± SEM): individual curves were averaged starting from the test phase (time point 0). Gray vertical lines indicate the timepoints of VA and corresponding OPT threshold determination.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Extended monocular VWT training did not reliably increase VA, but long-term VWT training did. After determination of a standard VA, one eye was closed in animals of the VWT/MD group and mice were trained monocularly in the VWT. After an adaption phase of one week after MD (light gray background), a monocular VA (VA during MD) was determined (dark gray), then the previously closed eye was reopened, and binocular VWT training was continued (another 7 d adaption phase was introduced, light gray), until a long-term VA was determined (white). Note that individual mice (A, B) responded quite differently to MD. Data plotted as in Figure 2A.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Mouse X reached a VA of 1.49 cyc/deg after 34 d of VWT training (1040 trials). This individual mouse exhibited a consistent behavioral strategy for deciding where to swim: it held onto the midline divider (see also Video 1). Data plotted as in Figure 2A.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    VA increase after long-term VWT training. A, Gain on baseline (%) of long-term VA of the VWT/no-MD (left, n = 5) and VWT/MD-reopening (sub)group (MD, right, n = 6). Values are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was tested by a two-tailed unpaired t test.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    VWT and OPT thresholds of individual mice develop differently. Quantitative comparison of VWT-determined VA (A) and OPT thresholds (B) in individual animals of the VWT/no-MD group (n = 5) before (standard) and after long-term VWT training (left column) and in the VWT/MD group before (standard, n = 11), during (n = 11), and after MD (long-term, VWT/MD-reopening, n = 6/11; right column). The color code indicates low initial standard VA values in yellowish, higher values in reddish colors. A, VA (cyc/deg), determined by VWT. B, Spatial frequency threshold of the OPT reflex (OPT threshold, cyc/deg). A, B, Statistical significance was tested by two-tailed paired t tests; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. C, Average VA and OPT thresholds. Values are represented as mean ± SEM (D) VA plotted against OPT thresholds of individual mice.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Training time in the VWT and correlation with VA. Time required to finish the different episodes of VWT training in (A) days and (B) minutes of the VWT/no-MD (upper row, n = 5) and VWT/MD(-reopening) group (lower row, n = 11 for standard and VA during MD, n = 6 for long-term VA after MD reopening). Individual data points are color-coded as introduced in Figure 6. C, Correlation of time required per correct trial near the break (spatial frequency of the break and two frequency steps below) and VA.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Long-term MD induced OD plasticity in adult mouse V1. Optically recorded activity maps of the contralateral (contra) and ipsilateral (ipsi) eye in the binocular part of V1 of SC-raised mice with (A, B) and without (C, D) VWT training, before (no-MD; A, C) and after MD (B, D). Gray scale-coded activity maps (numbers correspond to quantified V1 activation), color-coded two-dimensional OD maps (color codes ODI), and the histogram of OD scores, including the average ODI, are illustrated. In mice without MD (A, C), activity patches evoked by visual stimulation of the contralateral eye are darker than those of the ipsilateral eye, warm colors prevail in the two-dimensional OD maps and ODI values are positive. Long-term MD (MD eye is indicated by the black spot) resulted in a strong OD shift toward the open eye in both the VWT-trained and SC mice (B, D): both eyes activated V1 more equally strong, colder colors prevailed in the OD maps, and ODI values were lower, i.e., the ODI histograms shifted to the left (blue arrows). Note that there is a visible decrease of deprived (contra) eye responses after MD in V1 of VWT mice (B), which is absent after MD in SC mice (D). ant, anterior; lat, lateral. Scale bar: 1 mm.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Quantification of visual cortical activation before and after MD. ODI (A) and V1 activation (B) in V1 of VWT-trained and SC mice. A, Optically imaged ODIs without (no-MD) and with MD in VWT (white) and SC (gray) mice. Symbols represent ODI values of individuals; means are marked by horizontal lines. MD is indicated by half-black circles. B, V1 activation elicited by stimulation of the contralateral (C) or ipsilateral (I) eye in VWT and SC mice with MD. Black filled circles indicate MD eye. A, B, Data represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was tested by Mann–Whitney tests: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Movies
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Rules underlying the VWT Test Phases I–III

    Visual water task - rules
    Frequency range (cyc/deg)0.086–0.1720.201–0.372≥0.401
    Criteria to pass(correct trials/total trials)1/13/35/5
    or 3/4or 5/6or 7/10
    or 7/10or 7/10
    → break→ break→ break
    • Different criteria applied for different spatial frequency ranges, e.g., in the lowest range, one correct trial was sufficient for passing this frequency step, resulting in an increase of the spatial frequency. If an animal failed the first trial, it still had the chance to pass by correctly choosing in three out of four or seven out of 10 trials. If it failed, the spatial frequency was decreased by three steps. In higher frequency ranges, the criteria were more strict to exclude coincidental passing.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Statistical analysis

    FigureGroupParameternCI95Data structureComparisonType of testp/r 2 value
    5VWT/no-MD and VWT/MD-reopening[A] no-MD – VA % gain[B] MD – VA % gain56[9.692; 53.92][11.10; 57.88]Normal distributionNormal distribution[A] vs [B]Unpaired t testp = 0.8328
    6AVWT/no-MD[A] standard VA[B] long-term VA55[0.4854; 0.6263][0.5755; 0.8913]Normal distributionNormal distribution[A] vs [B]Paired t testp = 0.0171*
    6AVWT/MD(-reopening)[A] standard VA[B] VA during MD[C] long-term VA11/611/66[0.5927; 0.6849][0.5339; 0.7873][0.7901; 0.9986]Normal distributionAssumed normal distributionNormal distribution[A] vs [B] (11/11)[B] vs [C] (6/6)[A] vs [C] (6/6)Paired t testPaired t testPaired t testp = 0.7291p = 0.0471*p = 0.0088**
    6BVWT/no-MD[A] standard OPT thr[B] long-term OPT thr55[0.3822; 0.4110][0.3763: 0.4101]Normal distributionAssumed normal distribution[A] vs [B]Paired t testp = 0.3310
    6BVWT/MD[A] standard OPT thr[B] OPT thr during MD[C] long-term OPT thr11/611/66[0.3831; 0.4072][0.4220; 0.4646][0.3795; 0.4363]Normal distributionNormal distributionNormal distribution[A] vs [B] (11/11)[B] vs [C] (6/6)[A] vs [C] (6/6)Paired t testPaired t testPaired t testp = 0.0002 ***p = 0.0289*p = 0.0783
    6DVWT/no-MD[A] standard VA/OPT thr[B] long-term VA/OPT thr55NANANANAVA vs OPT thrVA vs OPT thrCorrelationCorrelationr 2 = 0.2210r 2 = 0.2347
    6DVWT/MD(-reopening)[A] standard VA/OPT thr[B] VA/OPT thr during MD[C] long-term VA/OPT thr11116NANANANANANAVA vs OPT thrVA vs OPT thrVA vs OPT thrCorrelationCorrelationCorrelationr 2 = 0.0026r 2 = 0.0180r 2 = 0.0266
    7CVWT/no-MD[A] standard VA[B] long-term VA55NANANANAVA vs s/trialVA vs s/trialCorrelationCorrelationr 2 = 0.0741r 2 = 0.4973
    7CVWT/MD(-reopening)[A] standard VA[B] VA during MD[C] long-term VA11116NANANANANANAVA vs s/trialVA vs s/trialVA vs s/trialCorrelationCorrelationCorrelationr 2 = 0.1353r 2 = 0.1131r 2 = 0.0289
    9AVWT andSC-OI[A] VWT/no-MD-OI[B] VWT/MD-OI[C] SC/no-MD-OI[D] SC/MD-OI4554[0.2754; 0.5196][-0.0677;0.1597][0.2492; 0.3908][0.04208; 0.1829]UnknownNormal distributionNormal distributionUnknown[A] vs [B][C] vs [D][A] vs [C][B] vs [D]Mann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–Whitneyp = 0.0159*p = 0.0159*p = 0.2187p = 0.2663
    9BVWT andSC-OI[A] VWT/no-MD-OI, contra[B] VWT/no-MD-OI, ipsi[C] VWT/MD-OI, contra[D] VWT/MD-OI, ipsi[E] SC/no-MD-OI, contra[F] SC/no-MD-OI, ipsi[G] SC/MD-OI, contra[H] SC/MD-OI, ipsi44555544[1.649; 2.286][0.8821; 1.013][0.8455; 1.946][0.7713; 2.373][1.325; 1.915][0.7865; 1.150][0.7516; 1.878][0.9528; 1.487]UnknownUnknownNormal distributionNormal distributionNormal distributionNormal distributionUnknownUnknown[A] vs [B][C] vs [D][E] vs [F][G] vs [H][A] vs [C][B] vs [D][E] vs [G][F] vs [H]Mann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–WhitneyMann–Whitneyp = 0.0286*p = 0.8413p = 0.0079**p = 0.6857p = 0.0317*p = 0.1905p = 0.2857p = 0.0851
    • The table lists from left to right the figures referred to, groups compared (group), parameters analyzed (parameter), number of animals (n), lower (left) and upper (right) 95% confidence interval of the mean (CI95), distribution of the values (data structure), comparisons of (sub)groups abbreviated as indicated in the parameter column (comparison), test applied for the comparison (type of test), and statistical readout (p/r 2 value). OPT thr, OPT threshold; ipsi and contra, ipsilateral and contralateral eye; NA, not assessable; s/trial, seconds required per correct trial near the break. Significance levels were set as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Movies

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Video 1.

    Mouse X performing the VWT. In the recorded example, the rewarded visual stimulus consists of a vertical sine wave grating with a spatial frequency of 1.39 cyc/deg. The video starts with a close-up of the stimulus monitor to show the high spatial frequency of the presented grating stimulus (upper left), the nonrewarded stimulus is equiluminant gray (upper right). Reflections of the stimuli on the water surface are seen below. The mouse is released into the water-filled pool and swims toward the midline divider, holds on to it, and repeatedly looks either left or right before deciding to swim leftwards (correct response).

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 5 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 5, Issue 1
January/February 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Long-Term Visual Training Increases Visual Acuity and Long-Term Monocular Deprivation Promotes Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Standard Cage-Raised Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Long-Term Visual Training Increases Visual Acuity and Long-Term Monocular Deprivation Promotes Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Standard Cage-Raised Mice
Leon Hosang, Rashad Yusifov, Siegrid Löwel
eNeuro 2 January 2018, 5 (1) ENEURO.0289-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0289-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Long-Term Visual Training Increases Visual Acuity and Long-Term Monocular Deprivation Promotes Ocular Dominance Plasticity in Adult Standard Cage-Raised Mice
Leon Hosang, Rashad Yusifov, Siegrid Löwel
eNeuro 2 January 2018, 5 (1) ENEURO.0289-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0289-17.2017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cortical plasticity
  • intrinsic signal optical imaging
  • mouse vision
  • optomotry
  • visual water task

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Similar presynaptic action potential-calcium influx coupling in two types of large mossy fiber terminals innervating CA3 pyramidal cells and hilar mossy cells
  • Brain FNDC5/irisin expression in patients and mouse models of major depression
  • Microglia maintain homeostatic conditions in the developing rostral migratory stream
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Supramodal representation of the sense of body ownership in the human parieto-premotor and extrastriate cortices
  • Nonspiking Interneurons in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe Exhibit Spatially Restricted Activity
  • Pattern of Driver-Like Input onto Neurons of the Mouse Ventral Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.