Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Cognition and Behavior

Noradrenergic Regulation of Central Amygdala in Aversive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer

Vincent D. Campese, Jose M. Soroeta, Elena M. Vazey, Gary Aston-Jones, Joseph E. LeDoux and Robert M. Sears
eNeuro 13 October 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0224-17.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0224-17.2017
Vincent D. Campese
1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vincent D. Campese
Jose M. Soroeta
2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena M. Vazey
3Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elena M. Vazey
Gary Aston-Jones
4Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gary Aston-Jones
Joseph E. LeDoux
1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003
5Emotional Brain Institute, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joseph E. LeDoux
Robert M. Sears
1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003
5Emotional Brain Institute, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962
6Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert M. Sears
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Experiment 1 training data. Percent time freezing to the CS during the PTC phase are presented in the upper panel for each group. Mean avoidance shuttle responses from the USAA phase are presented in the middle panel for three-session blocks of training for each group. Freezing data to the USAA context for the first 5 min of sample sessions (1, 5, 10, and 15) are presented in the lower panel for each group in terms of percent time.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Experiment 1 test data. A, Experimental design, IP stands for intraperitoneal propranolol, procaterol or vehicle treatments administered before tests. B, Shuttling data during the PIT testing phase. These data are presented in terms of responses per minute for each group. Asterisks refer to statistical significance between the pre and CS periods while the hash indicates significance between vehicle and propranolol-treated subjects during the CS (all at the 0.05 α level). C, Freezing during the CS presentations in the PIT testing phase are presented in terms of percent time. The asterisk denotes significant differences in freezing between propranolol and procaterol-treated subjects. D, Freezing during the CS in the follow-up test for CS-elicited freezing conducted in the nonavoidance context. The asterisk signifies statistically significant differences in freezing between procaterol-treated subjects and all other groups.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Experiment 2. A, Design for experiment 2 training and transfer tests. B, Data from PIT tests preceded by IP and intracranial CNO/vehicle treatments are presented as a function of drug in terms of responses per minute during the pre and CS intervals. C, Data from control subjects that received IP CNO treatment before PIT testing but were not expressing hM3Dq receptors are also presented in terms of responses per minute. D, Postoperative PIT test data from subjects treated with intracranial vehicle and CNO before sessions without hM3Dq expression. E, The data from the follow-up tests for CS-elicited freezing are presented in terms of percent time freezing and are also expressed as a function of presession drug treatment. Asterisks indicate significance at the 0.05 α level.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Experiment 2 histology. A, Minimum (red) and maximum (green) viral expression in LC. Values are mm relative to the interaural line. B, Viral expression in LC (HA-tag, red), DBH staining (green), and a merge of the two (yellow; scale bar = 500 μm). C, Infusion sites for intracranial CNO treatment are presented relative to bregma (mm). D, Axon terminal expression of DREADD in CeA (HA-tag, red; scale bars = 500 μm (lower magnification) and 100 μm (higher magnification). HA-immunostaining in CeA is indicated by white arrows.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 5
September/October 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Noradrenergic Regulation of Central Amygdala in Aversive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Noradrenergic Regulation of Central Amygdala in Aversive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer
Vincent D. Campese, Jose M. Soroeta, Elena M. Vazey, Gary Aston-Jones, Joseph E. LeDoux, Robert M. Sears
eNeuro 13 October 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0224-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0224-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Noradrenergic Regulation of Central Amygdala in Aversive Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer
Vincent D. Campese, Jose M. Soroeta, Elena M. Vazey, Gary Aston-Jones, Joseph E. LeDoux, Robert M. Sears
eNeuro 13 October 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0224-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0224-17.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • central amygdala
  • expression
  • locus coeruleus
  • motivation
  • norepinephrine
  • PIT

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency
  • Transformed visual working memory representations in human occipitotemporal and posterior parietal cortices
  • Neural Speech-Tracking During Selective Attention: A Spatially Realistic Audiovisual Study
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.