Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Commentary, Cognition and Behavior

Of Mice and Men: Empirical Support for the Population-Based Social Epistasis Amplification Model (a Comment on )

Matthew Alexandar Sarraf and Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie
eNeuro 1 September 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0280-17.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0280-17.2017
Matthew Alexandar Sarraf
1University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie
2Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels B-1160, Belgium
3Unz Foundation, Palo Alto, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This commentary article offers new perspective on recent research investigating the behavioral and social ecological effects of a mutation related to autism spectrum disorders in mice. The authors explain the consistency of this research on mice with predictions advanced by a theory of the role of mutations in altering interorganismal gene-gene interactions (social epistasis) in social species including humans, known as the social epistasis amplification model. The potential significance of the mouse research for understanding contemporary human behavioral trends is explored.

  • depression
  • fitness
  • group selection
  • mutation accumulation
  • social epistasis
  • social hierarchy

Significance Statement

The authors explain the consistency of Kalbassi et al. (2017)'s research on mice with predictions advanced by a theory of the role of mutations in altering interorganismal gene-gene interactions (social epistasis) in social species, known as the social epistasis amplification model. In light of this model, the mouse research has implications for understanding some of the most important contemporary human behavioral trends.

Kalbassi et al. (2017) examined whether and how mice carrying a behavior-altering mutation change their social ecologies, which is to say their behavior and that of their conspecifics. Specifically, the authors investigated the effect of deletion of the gene Nlgn3, which is related to autism spectrum disorders, on the phenotypes of both “Nlgn3 knockout mice” and their “wild-type littermates” (i.e., mice without the deletion of Nlgn3) with which they were raised (p. 1). The authors determined that litters containing male mice both with (Nlgn3y/-) and without (Nlgn3y/+) deletion of Nlgn3 were substantially different from litters containing only Nlgn3y/+ mice (the authors also examined litters containing only Nlgn3y/- mice and various litters of female mice, but this commentary does not focus on these cases). Among the more striking findings are that the genotypically mixed compared to homogeneous litters lacked “a structured social hierarchy” (p. 9) and had lower levels of testosterone (in both Nlgn3y/- and Nlgn3y/+ mice); additionally, Nlgn3y/+ mice from genotypically homogeneous litters showed more interest in “social” as opposed to “non-social cues” (p. 9) than Nlgn3y/+ mice from genotypically mixed litters [the latter did not show a preference for one type of cue over the other, “showing an absence of interest for social cues” (p. 9)]. However, “re-expression of Nlgn3 in parvalbumin-expressing interneurons in Nlgn3y/- mice rescues their social submission phenotype and the corresponding effect on the wild-type littermates” (p. 2). The authors infer that their findings, taken collectively, indicate not only an effect of deletion of Nlgn3 on the phenotypes of mice carrying the mutation, but also on Nlgn3y/+ mice with which the carriers were raised. [Kalbassi et al. (2017) note that it appears not only that Nlgn3y/- mice affect the phenotypes of Nlgn3y/+ mice, but that the latter affect the phenotypes of the former.]

These results should be considered in the context of the broader body of theoretical and empirical work with which they are consistent. Most saliently, a paper published earlier this year integrated a great deal of research on social epistasis, i.e., interorganismal gene-gene interactions, and mutation load in humans, mice, and other organisms to develop the novel thesis that the fitness costs of the accumulation of certain kinds of deleterious mutations under conditions of relaxed negative selection in humans are externalized onto noncarrier individuals and thereby amplified via the damage that these mutations do to populations’ “group-level extended phenotype[s]” (Woodley of Menie et al., 2017). This theory, which was termed the social epistasis amplification model, is based partly on the biological literature concerning eusocial insects, in which the term “social epistasis” was coined (e.g., Linksvayer, 2007). Research on such insects has found that the adaptively optimal development of members of different castes in insect societies depends on certain intercaste genotypic interactions, or social epistases. Thus both the individual- and group-level fitness of eusocial insects, insofar as both are contingent on (inter- and intra-)caste structure and cooperation, depend on the existence of particular social distributions of genotypes and epistatic interactions among them. This fact suggests the possibility that, as a general rule, social species, including humans, require certain patterns of interorganismal genetic interactions to achieve and maintain adaptive optima at the individual and group levels (see Domingue & Belsky, 2017 for a detailed overview).

Just as the Nlgn3y/- mice damaged their immediate community ecology, e.g., by inhibiting the development of normal social hierarchies and driving down the testosterone levels of their wild-type litter-mates, because they carried a mutation, it is possible that the carriers of behavior-altering mutations in contemporary human populations reduce the fitness of their noncarrier counterparts and depress group-level fitness overall. Deletion of Nlgn3 is potentially a “spiteful mutation” (Woodley of Menie et al., 2017). A mutation is spiteful if it degrades the fitness of carriers and also undermines, or incurs opportunity costs on, the fitness of conspecifics with whom carriers enter into social epistatic transaction, e.g., by imposing sociocultural conditions that disincentivize procreation. Woodley of Menie et al. (2017) ran structured population models to explore the effects of spiteful mutations, which found that under relaxed negative selection, these mutations reach fixation because population growth offsets their individual-level fitness costs. But once a critical prevalence of mutations is present, their negative impact on the fitness of noncarriers causes rapid population decline. With negative selection against the carriers of these spiteful mutations restored, population growth continues until a stable equilibrium is established. Thus, Kalbassi et al. (2017) found, as Woodley of Menie et al. (2017)’s model predicts, that restoration of adaptive behavior occurred in mouse communities when Nlgn3 was re-expressed in Nlgn3y/- mice (this restoration simulates the effects of negative selection as reflected in Woodley of Menie et al., 2017’s model).

Moreover, there is much empirical evidence that a number of human populations are experiencing increasing loads of behavior-altering, and fitness-reducing, mutations. In at least some Western populations, the prevalence of several mental disorders associated with advanced paternal age [because older fathers bequeath more mutations to their offspring than younger ones (Rahbari et al., 2016)], most notably unipolar depression (Laursen et al., 2007) and autism (Kong et al., 2012), has substantially increased from the 20th to 21st centuries (Twenge et al., 2010; Russell et al., 2015). Furthermore, schizophrenia, another disorder associated with paternally acquired de novo mutations (Malaspina et al., 2002), may have been extremely rare before AD 1800 (Hare, 1988), but became more common thereafter, possibly because 19th century industrialization lowered the fitness costs associated with the disease. These secular trends, and others suggesting rising rates of subclinical behavioral abnormalities also (e.g., Greenfeld, 2013, pp. 621–622), could indicate a growing prevalence of spiteful mutations in particular populations. Additionally, Kalbassi et al. (2017)’s linking of the presence of Nlgn3y/- mice to testosterone decline across the board in the latter’s communities yields a compelling potential explanation for the observation of significantly declining testosterone levels in Western males (Travison et al., 2007). In the same demographic, sperm quality has been diminishing precipitously for at least the past few decades (Levine et al., 2017), a phenomenon in which the aforementioned losses of testosterone may be implicated. Certain cultural changes, such as secularization, have also been connected to fertility decline at the group and individual levels (Meisenberg, 2011), and there is evidence that irreligiosity is associated with behavioral and physical abnormalities indicative of higher relative burdens of deleterious mutations (Dutton, 2017). Religion is a group-level adaptation in humans (Wilson, 2002), as is social hierarchy in mice (van den Berg et al., 2015). Thus, the carriers of spiteful mutations may disrupt the patterns of social epistasis that sustain religiosity and other group-level adaptations, and consequently lower fitness.

Woodley of Menie et al. (2017) predicted that results similar to Kalbassi et al. (2017)’s would be found in mice subjected to the proper experimental design. Kalbassi et al. (2017) are to be commended for devising a better procedure than that contained in the provisional experiment offered by Woodley of Menie et al. (2017)—which is a variant of the “mouse utopia” experiments of Calhoun (1973)—wherein two mice colonies were to be bred under cornucopian conditions. The colony serving as a control would be an effective replication of Calhoun’s own mouse utopia, where, like Calhoun’s colony, the mouse population would presumably cycle through to collapse. However, in the case of the experimental colony, lines showing signs of having accumulated behavior-altering mutations would be treated with CRISPR (a gene-editing technology) to remove such mutations. If the experimental colony could be indefinitely sustained and avoid the population collapse of the control colony, this would strongly evidence that deleterious mutation accumulation, permitted by conditions of minimized morbidity and mortality, caused the control colony’s breakdown. Since Kalbassi et al. (2017) observed that adaptive behavior was restored in communities with both Nlgn3y/- and Nlgn3y/+, and that restoration occurred in both types of mice, when Nlgn3 was re-expressed in Nlgn3y/- mice, they have effectively demonstrated what Woodley of Menie et al. (2017)’s proposed experiment was predicted to show. It is also interesting to note that Calhoun (1973) observed that the decline of the mouse utopia colonies was accompanied by an increase in the prevalence of behaviorally abnormal mice—termed “beautiful ones.” Calhoun described these mice as “autistic-like creatures” (Calhoun, 1973, p. 86)—might these mice have possessed genotypes similar to the knockout mice examined by Kalbassi et al. (2017)?

Finally, a potential extension of the experiments of Kalbassi et al. (2017) would be to set up competition over limited resources (such as restricted access to food, territory, etc.) between differentially tagged groups of male mice [one group genotypically heterogeneous (containing Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/- mice) and the other homogeneous (containing only Nlgn3y/+ mice)]. Given the suppressing effect of the presence of Nlgn3y/- mice on the testosterone levels of their wild-type littermates, and given the hierarchy-avoidant behaviors that seemingly result, it is predicted that the homogeneous colony would outcompete the heterogeneous one, indicating greater group-level fitness. Competing differentially tagged groups of mice that are composed only of Nlgn3y/+ mice could serve as a control for such an experiment, as the outcome of the latter competition in terms of which group gains the upper-hand should be due to contingent factors and would therefore essentially be random.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Calhoun JB (1973) Death squared: the explosive growth and demise of a mouse population. Proc R Soc Med 66:80–88. pmid:4734760
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Domingue BW, Belsky DW (2017) The social genome: current findings and implications for the study of human genetics. PLOS Genet 13:e1006615.
  3. ↵
    Dutton E (2017) ‘The mutant says in his heart “There is no God”’: atheism as evidence of high mutational load under conditions of weakened selection. Oral presentation given at the 4th Annual London Conference on Intelligence, London, UK.
  4. ↵
    Greenfeld L (2013) Mind, modernity, madness: the impact of culture on human experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  5. ↵
    Hare E (1988) Schizophrenia as a recent disease. Br J Psychiatry 153:521–531. pmid:3074859
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Kalbassi S, Bachmann SO, Cross E, Roberton VH, Baudouin SJ (2017) Male and female mice lacking Neuroligin-3 modify the behavior of their wild-type littermates. eNeuro 4:1–14. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0145-17.2017
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, Besenbacher S, Sulem P, Magnusson G, Stefansson K (2012) Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature 488:471–475. doi:10.1038/nature11396 pmid:22914163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Laursen TM, Munk-Olsen T, Nordentoft M, Bo Mortensen P (2007) A comparison of selected risk factors for unipolar depressive disorder, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia from a Danish population-based cohort. J Clin Psychiatry 68:1673–1681. doi:10.4088/JCP.v68n1106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Mindlis I, Pinotti R, Swan SH (2017) Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Hum Reprod Update 1–14.
  10. ↵
    Linksvayer TA (2007) Ant species differences determined by epistasis between brood and worker genomes. PLoS One 2:e994. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000994 pmid:17912371
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Malaspina D, Corcoran C, Fahim C, Berman A, Harkavy-Friedman J, Yale S, Goetz D, Goetz R, Harlap S, Gorman J (2002) Paternal age and sporadic schizophrenia: evidence for de novo mutations. Am J Med Genet 114:299–303. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1701
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Meisenberg G (2011) Secularization and desecularization in our time. J Soc Polit Econ St 36:318–359.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Rahbari R, Wuster A, Lindsay SJ, Hurles ME (2016) Timing, rates and spectra of human germline mutation. Nat Genet 48:126–133. doi:10.1038/ng.3469 pmid:26656846
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Russell G, Collishaw S, Golding J, Kelly SE, Ford T (2015) Changes in diagnosis rates and behavioural traits of autism spectrum disorder over time. BJPsych Open 1: 110–115.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Travison TG, Araujo AB, O’Donnell AB, Kupelian V, McKinlay JB (2007) A population-level decline in serum testosterone level in American men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:196–202. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1375 pmid:17062768
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Twenge JM, Gentile B, Dewall CN, Ma D, Lacefield K, Schurtz DR (2010) Birth cohort increases in psychopathology among young Americans, 1938-2007: a crosstemporal meta-analysis of the MMPI. Clin Psychol Rev 30:145–154. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.005 pmid:19945203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    van den Berg WE, Lamballais S, Kushner SA (2015) Sex-specific mechanism of social hierarchy in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:1364–1372. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.319 pmid:25469681
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Wilson DS (2002) Darwin’s cathedral: evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  19. ↵
    Woodley of Menie MA, Sarraf MA, Pestow RN, Fernandes HBF (2017) Social epistasis amplifies the fitness costs of deleterious mutations, engendering rapid fitness decline among modernized populations. Evol Psychol Sci 3:181–191. doi:10.1007/s40806-017-0084-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Carmen Sandi, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below.

This commentary article offers a new perspective on the recently published article by Kalbassi et al. (2017) in eNeuro. Findings in the original article are authoritatively put into the context of previous work and predictions by the theory of the role of interorganismal gene-gene interactions. In addition, the commentary emphasizes the translational relevance of the original work in mice to understand similar phenomena in humans.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 5
September/October 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Of Mice and Men: Empirical Support for the Population-Based Social Epistasis Amplification Model (a Comment on )
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Of Mice and Men: Empirical Support for the Population-Based Social Epistasis Amplification Model (a Comment on )
Matthew Alexandar Sarraf, Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie
eNeuro 1 September 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0280-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0280-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Of Mice and Men: Empirical Support for the Population-Based Social Epistasis Amplification Model (a Comment on )
Matthew Alexandar Sarraf, Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie
eNeuro 1 September 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0280-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0280-17.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • depression
  • Fitness
  • Group Selection
  • Mutation Accumulation
  • Social Epistasis
  • Social Hierarchy

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Commentary

  • Illuminating the Shadows of Neuroscience: How Curiosity and Courage Redefine Research Models and Mentorship
  • Stop Fooling Yourself! (Diagnosing and Treating Confirmation Bias)
  • Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them
Show more Commentary

Cognition and Behavior

  • Novel Insights into the Social Functions of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Infancy
  • An automatic domain-general error signal is shared across tasks and predicts confidence in different sensory modalities
  • Dissociating Frontal Lobe Lesion Induced Deficits in Rule Value Learning Using Reinforcement Learning Models and a WCST Analog
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Commentaries
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.