Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Neuronal Excitability

Coordinated Expression of Two Types of Low-Threshold K+ Channels Establishes Unique Single Spiking of Mauthner Cells among Segmentally Homologous Neurons in the Zebrafish Hindbrain

Takaki Watanabe, Takashi Shimazaki and Yoichi Oda
eNeuro 4 October 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0249-17.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0249-17.2017
Takaki Watanabe
Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Takaki Watanabe
Takashi Shimazaki
Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoichi Oda
Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yoichi Oda
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Effect of DTX and/or XE991 on single spiking in developed M cells. A, Firing response of M cells at 4–7 dpf [upper three rows of traces elicited by step depolarizing currents (lower traces) of 1×, 1.5×, and 2× threshold intensity (T), as represented in nA on 1T traces] before and after bath application of either 100 nM DTX, 10 μM XE991, or both. B, Initial phase of repetitive firing in response to 2T current injection recorded from M cells with DTX and XE991 treatment, and untreated (control) MiD2cm and MiD3cm cells at 4 dpf. C, Number of APs elicited during a depolarizing current pulse (100 ms) plotted against current intensity (T). The number of APs significantly increased after combined DTX and XE991 treatment compared with each separately. D, Summary data for the ISI of repetitive firing in response to 2T current injection against the interval number. After combined DTX and XE991 treatment, M cells at 4–7 dpf exhibited ISIs that were similar to untreated MiD2cm and MiD3cm cells at the same developmental stage. E, F, The effect of DTX and/or XE991 on threshold current (E) and onset latency of the first spike at 1T (F). Treatment of DTX, but not XE991, reduced the threshold current and increased spiking latency of M cells. n.s., not significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test (control, n = 14; +DTX, n = 8; +XE991, n = 7; +DTX + XE991, n = 6). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for ISI (MiD2cm, n = 8; MiD3cm, n = 7).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effect of DTX and/or XE991 on phasic bursting of immature M cells. A, Firing response from M cells at 2 dpf. XE991 treatment caused phasic bursting M cells (control) to fire tonically (+XE991, +DTX + XE991), whereas DTX treatment did not (except for a slight delay of spike onset). B, Summary graph of the blocker effect at 2 dpf showing that the number of APs elicited during 100-ms current pulses significantly increased after XE991 treatment. C, In controls, M cells at 2 dpf showed spike accommodation with a gradual increase in ISI, whereas regular spiking with constant ISI was observed after XE991 treatment. Note that DTX application had no additional effect. D, The threshold current was significantly reduced after combined DTX and XE991 treatment. E, Spike latency greatly increased after XE991 treatment. n.s., not significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test (control, n = 6; +DTX, n = 6; +XE991, n = 10; +DTX + XE991, n = 7). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for ISI.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Expression of Kv7.4/Kcnq4 mRNA in M cells during development. A, Phylogenetic tree of α-subunit proteins of XE991-sensitive voltage-gated K+ channel Kv7/KCNQ family members in zebrafish, Xenopus, chick, mouse, and human (z, x, c, m, and h as the gene prefix, respectively), and showing identification of zebrafish Kv7.4 (magenta). B, Dorsal views of rhombomeres 4, 5, and 6 (r4, r5, and r6) in the hindbrain at 2 dpf (top) and 5 dpf (bottom) after in situ hybridization using a Kv7.4 antisense probe (green). Kv7.4 mRNA was expressed in M cells (arrowhead) at 2 and 5 dpf, but not in MiD2cm and MiD3cm cells, labeled (magenta) immunohistochemically (with 3A10 antibody, at 2 dpf) or retrogradely (at 5 dpf). Scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Gating properties of zebrafish Kv7.4 and Kv1.1 with/without Kvβ2 in Xenopus oocytes. A, Voltage-gated outward currents recorded from Xenopus oocytes expressing zebrafish Kv7.4 (top), Kv1.1a alone (middle), or Kv1.1a with Kvβ2b subunit (bottom). Command voltages (V) ranging from −80 to +50 mV in 10 mV steps were applied for 200 ms. B, Conductance (G, μs) at peak current amplitude was plotted as a function of the command voltage. C, The G-V relationship normalized to maximum value (Gmax) shows that currents elicited above −60 mV had different open probabilities. D, E, Rise time to half-maximum activation (t1/2) of Kv7.4 (D) above −60 mV was significantly different from Kv1.1a with and without Kvβ2b (E; p < 0.01). **p < 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Bonferroni correction (Kv7.4, n = 20; Kv1.1a, n = 32; Kv1.1a + Kvβ2b, n = 26).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Computational model of low-threshold K+ channels. A, Voltage-gated outward currents of model zebrafish Kv7.4 (blue), Kv1.1 (orange), and Kv1.1 channels coexpressed with Kvβ2 (green) represented by a Hodgkin-Huxley equation. B–D, Normalized G-V plots (B), and rise time (t1/2) of model Kv7.4 (C), Kv1.1 and Kv1.1 + Kvβ2 (D) resemble those obtained in Xenopus oocytes (Fig. 4).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    M-cell firing model integrating low-threshold K+ channels in response to long step currents. A, B, Representative current-clamp simulation of a model neuron integrating two types of low-threshold K+ channels associated with Kvβ2 subunits into a basic tonic-firing model. Long step currents of 1T, 1.5T, and 2T were injected. Maximum conductances (ḡKv1.1, ḡKv7.4; A) or (ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2, ḡKv7.4; B) are indicated in parentheses. Bold italic numbers represent conductances associated with Kvβ2. Expression of low-threshold K+ channels alters the tonic-firing model to exhibit phasic bursting with long or short firing duration and single spiking, as observed with in vivo M-cell recordings (Figs. 1, 2).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Comprehensive analysis of firing parameters in the M-cell model. A–E, Firing parameters of low-threshold K+ channel-integrated model cells with different combinations of (ḡKv1.1, ḡKv7.4; left) or (ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2, ḡKv7.4; right), with respect to threshold current (T; A), onset latency of first AP at 1T (B), number of elicited APs during 100 ms at 1.5T (C) and 2T (D), and ISIlast/ISI1st at 2T (E). In each panel, 1071 firing patterns (21 × 51 combinations) were produced by increments of 100 ns for ḡKv7.4 and 20 ns for ḡKv1.1 or ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2, ranging from 0-2000 ns (40 ms/cm2) and 0-1000 ns (20 ms/cm2), respectively. The Kv1.1 model (ḡKv1.1, ḡKv7.4: 480, 0) and Kv1.1 + Kvβ2 model (ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2, ḡKv7.4: 240, 0) had a similar threshold current (around 500 pA; A). The Kv1.1 model (ḡKv1.1, ḡKv7.4: 920, 0) showed two spikes at 1.5T, and this firing rate was also seen in the Kv1.1 + Kvβ2 model (ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2, ḡKv7.4: 540, 0; C), indicating that faster activation of Kv1.1 by Kvβ2 efficiently suppressed repetitive firing.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Na+ and K+ conductance mechanisms for producing characteristic phasic properties. A–D, Representative dynamics of voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channel conductance for gNav (black), ghigh (green), gA (gray), gKv7.4 (blue), and gKv1.1 or gKv1.1+Kvβ2 (red) during current-clamp stimulation. These conductances were normalized to maximum values of Na+ or among K+ conductance at 1.5T using a 2-dpf (A, B) and 4-dpf (C, D) M-cell model, shown in Figure 7A,B, respectively. Conductance dynamics at the beginning of current injection in B, D show the first AP generation of A, C, respectively. E–H, Changes in membrane potential at subthreshold (solid line, below 1–2 pA of 1T), and 1T (dashed line) in the 4-dpf M-cell model (black), XE991-treated model (red), and DTX-treated model (blue; E). The corresponding Na+ and K+ conductance in each model during subthreshold firing (F–H). Na+ conductance became much larger after fast activation of K+ conductance (ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2; F, G) compared with slow activation of K+ conductance (ḡKv7.4; H).

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Simulation of M-cell firing in response to repetitive short-pulse currents. A, B, Current-clamp simulation of each model neuron (ḡKv1.1, ḡKv7.4; A) or (ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2, ḡKv7.4; B), which was the same as in Figure 6 except that repetitive short-pulse currents (0.5 ms) of 1T, 2 nA, and 3 nA with 500 Hz were given for 100 ms. C, D, Number of APs simulated in (ḡKv1.1, ḡKv7.4; C) or (ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2, ḡKv7.4; D) are plotted during the current injection in 20-pA increments up to 3 nA. E, F, Threshold current (E) and onset latency of the first spike at 1T (F) for each model neuron (ḡKv1.1, ḡKv7.4) or (ḡKv1.1+Kvβ2, ḡKv7.4).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Comparison of the parameters of the Boltzmann equation in Xenopus oocytes system is shown

    nV1/2 (mV)k
    Kv7.420−10.1 ± 1.715.4 ± 0.7
    Kv1.1a32−35.4 ± 1.4**7.4 ± 0.3**
    Kv1.1a + Kvβ2b26−36.6 ± 1.1**9.4 ± 0.5**
    • All values are represented as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U tests against the value of Kv7.4.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data 1

    The model channel generator and firing simulator on NEURON simulator. The NEURON model files encode the channel generator and firing simulator for simulating development and differentiation of the M-cell excitability. The channel generator enables us to generate arbitrary Na+ and K+ channels by changing parameters of a Hodgkin-Huxley model under emulation of two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings in Xenopus oocyte system. The firing simulator simulates current-clamp recordings to generate firing pattern of the model M cell, which are implemented with arbitrary-generated Na+ and K+ conductances and low-threshold K+ channels Kv7.4/KCNQ4 and sole Kv1.1 or Kv1.1 coexpressed with Kvβ2. Download Extended data, ZIP file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 5
September/October 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Coordinated Expression of Two Types of Low-Threshold K+ Channels Establishes Unique Single Spiking of Mauthner Cells among Segmentally Homologous Neurons in the Zebrafish Hindbrain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Coordinated Expression of Two Types of Low-Threshold K+ Channels Establishes Unique Single Spiking of Mauthner Cells among Segmentally Homologous Neurons in the Zebrafish Hindbrain
Takaki Watanabe, Takashi Shimazaki, Yoichi Oda
eNeuro 4 October 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0249-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0249-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Coordinated Expression of Two Types of Low-Threshold K+ Channels Establishes Unique Single Spiking of Mauthner Cells among Segmentally Homologous Neurons in the Zebrafish Hindbrain
Takaki Watanabe, Takashi Shimazaki, Yoichi Oda
eNeuro 4 October 2017, 4 (5) ENEURO.0249-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0249-17.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Kv1.1
  • Kv7.4
  • Kvβ2
  • Mauthner cell
  • Phasic Firing
  • simulation

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Galanin Inhibits Histaminergic Neurons via Galanin Receptor 1
  • The Neurexin1β Histidine-Rich Domain Is Involved in Excitatory Presynaptic Organization and Short-Term Plasticity
  • Fast Spiking Interneurons Autonomously Generate Fast Gamma Oscillations in the Medial Entorhinal Cortex with Excitation Strength Tuning ING–PING Transitions
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.