Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts

eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Male and Female Mice Lacking Neuroligin-3 Modify the Behavior of Their Wild-Type Littermates

Shireene Kalbassi, Sven O. Bachmann, Ellen Cross, Victoria H. Roberton and Stéphane J. Baudouin
eNeuro 31 July 2017, 4 (4) ENEURO.0145-17.2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0145-17.2017
Shireene Kalbassi
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven O. Bachmann
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sven O. Bachmann
Ellen Cross
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria H. Roberton
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Victoria H. Roberton
Stéphane J. Baudouin
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stéphane J. Baudouin
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Summary of the breeding schemes.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Adult Nlgn3y/– mice (2–4 mo old) are submissive to their Nlgn3y/+ littermates. Littermate groups were composed of (1) Nlgn3y/+ mice in SGH and (2) Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– mice in MGH. A, Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH spent less time vocalizing to a female in estrus compared with Nlgn3y/+ from MGH. B, Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH lost more frequently in the tube test against their Nlgn3y/+ littermates. C, Absence of correlation between rank in the tube and ultrasonic vocalization tests in MGH mice. D, For each group of mice from SGH and MGH, we plotted the rank in the vocalization test for the mice that were dominant in the tube test. All mice from SGH that won in the tube test also vocalized the most, and 5 of 13 mice from MGH (38%) that won in the tube test vocalized the most. For mice from MGH, black dots with gray circles are Nlgn3y/+ mice, and gray dots with black circles are Nlgn3y/– mice. Values are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was tested by two-tailed t test (A) and two-tailed Mann–Whitney test (B and C); *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Decreased competitive behavior in adult (2- to 4-mo-old) Nlgn3y/– and Nlgn3y/+ mice from MGH. A, Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH were defeated more frequently than Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/ – mice from SGH when opposed to an unfamiliar submissive male in the tube test. B, Increased urinary testosterone levels in Nlgn3y/+ mice from SGH. C, Housing conditions did not modify the time Nlgn3y/+ or Nlgn3y/– mice spent calling a female in estrus. Regardless of the housing conditions, Nlgn3y/– mice spent less time calling a female in estrus than Nlgn3y/+ mice. Note that data from Fig. 2A were replotted here to allow comparison. D, Hepatic mRNA expression levels of Cyp2d9 were similar between mice in MGH and SGH. Values are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was tested by Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test (A and B) and one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C and D). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Adult (2- to 4-mo-old) Nlgn3y/– mice modify the social behavior of their littermates. A, Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– mice from SGH and Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH showed increased interest in social odors compared with water, whereas this increased interest was absent in Nlgn3y/+ mice from MGH. Note that Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– mice from SGH spent more time sniffing the social odor compared with Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH, respectively. B, Nlgn3y/+PvalbCre/+ and Nlgn3y/–PvalbCre/+ mice showed an increased interest for social odors compared with Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH. C, Western blot analysis shows a ratio of re-expression of 0.7 in the cerebellum, 0.15 in the brainstem, 0.1 in the striatum, 0.1 in the thalamus, and 0.04 in the cortex and no re-expression in the hippocampus. Note that the upper band in the brainstem Nlgn3y/– sample is most likely unspecific, as it appears in protein samples from Nlgn3y/– mice. D, Nlgn3y/– and Nlgn3y/+ mice from MGH lost more frequently against an unfamiliar submissive mouse compared with Nlgn3y/–PvalbCre/+ and Nlgn3y/+PvalbCre/+ mice. No difference in the percentage of wins against an unfamiliar submissive male was found in the tube test between Nlgn3y/+PvalbCre/+ and Nlgn3y/–PvalbCre/+ mice. Note that Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH data are replotted from Fig. 3A. The dotted line represents the mean percentage of wins for Nlgn3y/+ mice from SGH. E, Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH and Nlgn3y/–PvalbCre/+ mice spent less time calling a female in estrus than Nlgn3y/+ mice from MGH and Nlgn3y/+PvalbCre/+mice, respectively. The dotted line represents the mean time sent calling for Nlgn3y/+ mice from SGH, replotted from Fig. 3B. Values are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was tested by two-way ANOVA repeated-measures (A), two-way ANOVA (B, D, and E), and post hoc Sidak’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    In young mice (P21–P28), MGH modifies the interest in social interaction of Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– but not Nlgn3–/–mice. A, At P21–P28, Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– from SGH and Nlgn3y/+PvalbCre/+ and Nlgn3y/–PvalbCre/+ mice spent more time in contact with an unfamiliar female than Nlgn3y/+ and Nlgn3y/– mice. B, C, No difference in the total distance and the normalized distanced traveled in the center of the OF. D, No difference in the time spent in the open arms of the EPM. E–H, MGH has no significant effect on the time spent in social interaction, the total distance and normalized distance traveled in the center of the OF, and the time spent in the open arm of the EPM of females lacking Nlgn3 (Nlgn3–/–). Values are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was tested by two-way ANOVA and post hoc Sidak’s multiple comparison test (A–C). ***P < 0.001.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Increased anxiety in adult (2- to 4-mo-old) Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH. A, Increased distance traveled in OF in Nlgn3y/– mice from MGH compared to Nlgn3y/– mice in SGH and Nlgn3y/+. B, No change in the average number of beam breaks per hour recorded over 30 h. C, Number of beam breaks per hour over 30 h. D, Increased normalized distance traveled in the center of the OF for Nlgn3y/– mice in SGH compared with Nlgn3y/+ mice from SGH and mice from MGH. E, Increased number of marbles buried by mice in MGH compared with mice from SGH. Nlgn3y/– mice in SGH buried fewer marbles than Nlgn3y/+ mice in SGH. Values are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was tested by two-way ANOVA and post hoc Sidak’s multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 (A, B, D, and E).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Adult (2- to 4-mo-old) Nlgn3–/– mice modify the social behavior of their littermates. We analyzed two littermate groups in which (1) Nlgn3+/– mice (Nlgn3+/–H-WT) were littermates of Nlgn3+/+ mice or (2) Nlgn3+/– mice (Nlgn3+/– H-KO) were littermates of Nlgn3–/– mice. A, Nlgn3+/–H-KO and Nlgn3–/– mice spent less time in contact with an unfamiliar female than Nlgn3+/+ and Nlgn3+/–H-WT mice. B, Increased distance traveled by Nlgn3–/– mice in the OF compared with Nlgn3+/–H-WT and Nlgn3+/–H-KO mice. C, Increased normalized distance traveled in the center of the OF for Nlgn3–/– mice. D, No change in the time spent in the open arms of the EPM. Values are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was tested by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test (A, C, and D) and Kruskal–Wallis and post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparison tests (B). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0001.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Details of statistical analysis

    FigureData structureType of testObserved powern
    2ANormal distributiont test0.78Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 19Nlgn3y/– MGH: 17
    2BNonparametricMann–WhitneyNANlgn3y/+ MGH: 19Nlgn3y/– MGH: 17
    2CUnknownCorrelation testNAMGH: 13 cagesSGH: 6 cages
    2DNon parametricMann–WhitneyNAMGH: 13 cagesSGH: 6 cages
    3ANonparametricKruskal–WallisNANlgn3y/+ SGH: 21Nlgn3y/– SGH: 7Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 14Nlgn3y/– MGH:9
    3BNormal distributionOne way ANOVA/Tukey’s multiple comparison0.99Nlgn3y/+ SGH: 11Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 10Nlgn3y/– MGH: 8Nlgn3+/+: 7
    3CNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVAGenotype 0.896Nlgn3y/+ SGH: 19Nlgn3y/+ SGH: 14Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 19Nlgn3y/– MGH: 17
    3DNormal distributionOne-way ANOVANANlgn3y/+ SGH: 7Nlgn3y/– SGH: 6Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 5Nlgn3y/– MGH: 5
    4ANormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA repeated measure/Sidak’s multiple comparison/within-subject effectInteraction odor × genotype 1Nlgn3y/+ SGH: 12Nlgn3y/– SGH: 17Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 9Nlgn3y/– MGH: 6
    Genotype 1
    4BNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA/Sidak’s multiple comparisonPvalb 1Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 18Nlgn3y/– MGH: 19Nlgn3y/+ Pvalb Cre/+: 7Nlgn3y/– Pvalb Cre/+:7
    Odor 0.99
    Interaction PV × odor 0.94
    4CNormal distributionNANANlgn3y/+: 6Nlgn3y/– Pvalb Cre/+:7
    4DNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVAPvalb 0.77Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 14Nlgn3y/– MGH:9Nlgn3y/+ Pvalb Cre/+: 9Nlgn3y/– Pvalb Cre/+: 8
    4ENormal distributionTwo-way ANOVAGenotype 0.78Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 19Nlgn3y/– MGH: 17Nlgn3y/+ Pvalb Cre/+: 11Nlgn3y/– Pvalb Cre/+: 10
    5ANormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA/Sidak’s multiple comparisonHousing 0.984Nlgn3y/+ SGH: 9Nlgn3y/– SGH: 14Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 10Nlgn3y/– MGH: 10Nlgn3y/+ Pvalb Cre/+:15Nlgn3y/– Pvalb Cre/+: 17
    5BNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVANANlgn3y/+ SGH: 8Nlgn3y/– SGH: 9Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 12Nlgn3y/– MGH: 10Nlgn3y/+ Pvalb Cre/+:15Nlgn3y/– Pvalb Cre/+: 17
    5CNonparametricKruskal–WallisNANlgn3y/+ SGH: 9Nlgn3y/– SGH: 14Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 10Nlgn3y/– MGH: 10Nlgn3y/+ Pvalb Cre/+:15Nlgn3y/– Pvalb Cre/+: 17
    5DNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVANANlgn3y/+ SGH: 9Nlgn3y/– SGH: 14Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 11Nlgn3y/– MGH: 8Nlgn3y/+ Pvalb Cre/+:12Nlgn3y/– Pvalb Cre/+: 7
    5ENormal distributiont testNANlgn3–/– SGH: 15Nlgn3–/– MGH: 8
    5FNormal distributiont testNANlgn3–/– SGH: 15Nlgn3–/– MGH: 18
    5GNonparametricMann–WhitneyNANlgn3–/– SGH: 15Nlgn3–/– MGH: 18
    5HNormal distributiont testNANlgn3–/– SGH: 14Nlgn3–/– MGH: 6
    6ANormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA/Sidak’s multiple comparisonHousing 0.83Interaction 0.672Nlgn3y/+ SGH: 16Nlgn3y/– SGH: 12Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 26Nlgn3y/– MGH: 25
    6B-CNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVANANlgn3y/+ SGH: 6Nlgn3y/– SGH: 11Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 10Nlgn3y/– MGH: 9
    6BNormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA/Sidak’s multiple comparisonGenotype 0.997Interaction 0.987Nlgn3y/+ SGH: 16Nlgn3y/– SGH: 12Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 26Nlgn3y/– MGH: 25
    6ENormal distributionTwo-way ANOVA/Sidak’s multiple comparisonGenotype 0.76Genotype 0.52Nlgn3y/+ SGH: 11Nlgn3y/– SGH: 16Nlgn3y/+ MGH: 10Nlgn3y/– MGH: 10
    7ANormal distributionOne way ANOVA/Tukey’s multiple comparison0.99Nlgn3+/+: 10Nlgn3+/–H-WT: 9Nlgn3+/–H-KO: 7Nlgn3–/–: 11
    7BNonparametricKruskal–Wallis/Dunn’s multiple comparison0.94Nlgn3+/+: 10Nlgn3+/–H-WT: 9Nlgn3+/–H-KO: 12Nlgn3–/–: 18
    7CNormal distributionOne way ANOVA/Tukey’s multiple comparison0.96Nlgn3+/+: 10Nlgn3+/–H-WT: 9Nlgn3+/–H-KO: 12Nlgn3–/–: 18
    7DNormal distributionOne way ANOVANANlgn3+/+: 8Nlgn3+/–H-WT: 5Nlgn3+/–H-KO: 11Nlgn3–/–: 7
    • NA, not applicable.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 4
July/August 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Male and Female Mice Lacking Neuroligin-3 Modify the Behavior of Their Wild-Type Littermates
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Male and Female Mice Lacking Neuroligin-3 Modify the Behavior of Their Wild-Type Littermates
Shireene Kalbassi, Sven O. Bachmann, Ellen Cross, Victoria H. Roberton, Stéphane J. Baudouin
eNeuro 31 July 2017, 4 (4) ENEURO.0145-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0145-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Male and Female Mice Lacking Neuroligin-3 Modify the Behavior of Their Wild-Type Littermates
Shireene Kalbassi, Sven O. Bachmann, Ellen Cross, Victoria H. Roberton, Stéphane J. Baudouin
eNeuro 31 July 2017, 4 (4) ENEURO.0145-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0145-17.2017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • autism spectrum disorders
  • neuroligin
  • parvalbumin interneurons
  • social behavior

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Essential Role of Somatic Kv2 Channels in High-Frequency Firing in Cartwheel Cells of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus
  • Phenotypic differences between the Alzheimer’s disease-related hAPP-J20 model and heterozygous Zbtb20 knockout mice
  • Distinct basal metabolism in three mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Essential Role of Somatic Kv2 Channels in High-Frequency Firing in Cartwheel Cells of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus
  • Phenotypic differences between the Alzheimer’s disease-related hAPP-J20 model and heterozygous Zbtb20 knockout mice
  • Distinct basal metabolism in three mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.