Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Optogenetic Evidence for a Direct Circuit Linking Nociceptive Transmission through the Parabrachial Complex with Pain-Modulating Neurons of the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla (RVM)

QiLiang Chen, Zachary Roeder, Ming-Hua Li, YangMiao Zhang, Susan L. Ingram and Mary M. Heinricher
eNeuro 19 June 2017, 4 (3) ENEURO.0202-17.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0202-17.2017
QiLiang Chen
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
3Neuroscience Graduate Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary Roeder
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ming-Hua Li
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ming-Hua Li
YangMiao Zhang
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for YangMiao Zhang
Susan L. Ingram
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Susan L. Ingram
Mary M. Heinricher
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
2Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Examples of ChR2 and ArchT expression in the lateral PB region and terminal expression in RVM. Examples of ChR2 expression in (A) PB cell bodies and (B) PB projecting fibers in RVM. Examples of ArchT expression (C) PB cell bodies and (D) PB projecting fibers in RVM. lPB, lateral PB region; scp, superior cerebellar peduncle.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Vector injection sites in PB. Injection sites were distributed among sections at +0.24 to −0.36 mm relative to the interaural line. Injections inside the lateral PB (lPB) area were considered on-target. KF, Kölliker-Fuse; mPB, medial PB area; SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Recording sites within the RVM. Recording sites for both ArchT (gray circles) and ChR2 (black circles) experiments were distributed between −1.04 and −2.30 mm (relative to the interaural line). The majority of cells were isolated between −1.04 and −1.80 mm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Validation of ChR2 and ArchT function on PB neurons. A, Activation of PB neuron by light-induced activation of ChR2 (1- to 2-ms pulses at 2, 10, or 20 Hz). Firing of the neuron reliably followed the light trains. B, Suppression of activity of a PB neuron during light-induced activation of ArchT.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    In vitro electrophysiology shows evidence for direct, functional PB inputs to individual RVM neurons. A, Micrograph of slice showing area of PB microinjection. B, Expression of reporter for ChR2 construct in PB in area outlined by square in A. C, Low magnitude (4×) picture of RVM slice containing a biocytin-labeled neuron that was filled during recording. D, High magnification (20×) of biocytin-labeled cell in C. E, Light-evoked stimulation elicited either glutamatergic synaptic currents that were inhibited by KA but not BIC, or GABAergic synaptic currents that were inhibited by BIC but not KA. Note the difference in synaptic decay kinetics. Arrow indicates delivery of light stimulus.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Effect of ChR2-induced activation of PB terminals on ongoing firing of ON-, OFF-, and NEUTRAL-cells in RVM. Terminal activation significantly increased the net firing rate of both ON- and OFF-cells (A, B) but had no net effect on NEUTRAL cells (C). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with baseline, paired t test, n = 9–14 cells per class. Effects of different stimulation parameters are pooled for this analysis.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Effect of ChR2-induced activation of PB terminals on RVM neurons when using different stimulation protocols. As a class, ON-cells (A) and OFF-cells (B) showed significant and comparable responses to all light stimulation trains, whereas NEUTRAL-cells (C) did not respond during any protocol. Reported as geometric mean with 95% confidence intervals, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with the hypothetical value of 1 (no change), Wilcoxon’s signed rank test, n = 9–14 cells per class.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Effects of ArchT-induced inhibition of PB terminals and cell bodies on ON- and OFF-cell nociception-related activity. A, Representative examples show ON- and OFF-cell activity during withdrawal from noxious heat stimulus at baseline compared with during Arch-T inhibition of PB terminals in RVM or at the cell bodies in PB itself. Arrow denotes heat onset. In both cases, nociception-related changes in firing were substantially attenuated. Summary data are provided in B, C. B, ON-cells: effect of ArchT-induced inhibition of PB terminals and cell bodies on the ON-cell burst. C, OFF-cells: the effect of ArchT-induced inhibition of PB terminals and cell bodies on the OFF-cell pause. Reported as geometric mean with 95% confidence intervals, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with baseline, one-way ANOVA with repeated measures and post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, n = 15 ON-cells, 14 OFF-cells.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Effects of ArchT-induced inhibition of PB terminals and cell bodies on ongoing firing of ON- and OFF-cells in RVM. Terminal inhibition significantly decreased ON-cell ongoing firing, while increasing OFF-cell firing. Cell body inhibition did not significantly affect the ongoing firing of either ON- or OFF-cells. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with baseline, one-way ANOVA with repeated measures and post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, n = 15 ON-cells, 14 OFF-cells.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 3
May/June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optogenetic Evidence for a Direct Circuit Linking Nociceptive Transmission through the Parabrachial Complex with Pain-Modulating Neurons of the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla (RVM)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Optogenetic Evidence for a Direct Circuit Linking Nociceptive Transmission through the Parabrachial Complex with Pain-Modulating Neurons of the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla (RVM)
QiLiang Chen, Zachary Roeder, Ming-Hua Li, YangMiao Zhang, Susan L. Ingram, Mary M. Heinricher
eNeuro 19 June 2017, 4 (3) ENEURO.0202-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0202-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Optogenetic Evidence for a Direct Circuit Linking Nociceptive Transmission through the Parabrachial Complex with Pain-Modulating Neurons of the Rostral Ventromedial Medulla (RVM)
QiLiang Chen, Zachary Roeder, Ming-Hua Li, YangMiao Zhang, Susan L. Ingram, Mary M. Heinricher
eNeuro 19 June 2017, 4 (3) ENEURO.0202-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0202-17.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • brainstem
  • Descending Control
  • pain modulation
  • raphe
  • rat

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.