Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Development

Examining Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses by 3D Electron Microscopy in Wildtype and Kirrel3 Knockout Mice

E. Anne Martin, Derek Woodruff, Randi L. Rawson and Megan E. Williams
eNeuro 22 May 2017, 4 (3) ENEURO.0088-17.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0088-17.2017
E. Anne Martin
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Anne Martin
Derek Woodruff
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Derek Woodruff
Randi L. Rawson
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan E. Williams
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Megan E. Williams
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Movies
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Reconstructing MF presynaptic complexes by SBEM. A, Diagram of hippocampal MF circuitry. Boxed region notes the tissue area analyzed. On the right, the dark blue outline identifies the DG neuron. B, Representative image of a wildtype SBEM section showing MF synapse components: main MF bouton (dark blue), MF filopodia (light blue), DG axon (yellow), TEs (orange), SVs (red arrows), and mitochondria (white arrows). Scale bar, 1 μm. C, 3D reconstruction of the MF presynaptic complex in B. The postsynaptic TEs are not shown. Dotted line in C shows the location of slice shown in B. D,E, Sample wildtype (D) and Kirrel3 knockout (E) 3D reconstructions showing eight MF presynaptic complexes each.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    MF filopodia exist in three states during development. A, The average volume of the main MF bouton per genotype. p = 0.5102. B, The average number of MF filopodia per main MF bouton. p = 0.1323. C, Cumulative histogram showing the number of MF filopodia per main MF bouton in each genotype. Note: Kirrel3 knockouts tend to have MF boutons with fewer filopodia. p = 0.2360. D–F, Representative images of MF filopodia in each of the three synaptic states (synapse-free, partial, complete). Yellow arrow indicates PSD. For all graphs: sample size: WT = 30 and KO = 34 main MF boutons. Error bars show mean ± SEM. Scale bars, 1 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Kirrel3 regulates MF filopodial synapse density. A, Table showing percentage of MF filopodia that are synapse-free, or contain partial or complete synapses. Note: An individual MF filopodia can have multiple synapses, thus the totals do not sum to 100%. B–D, Quantification of the number of synapse-free MF filopodia (B), partial synapses (C), and complete synapses (D) per main MF bouton by genotype. E, Quantification of total number of synapses (partial + complete) per main MF bouton. *p = 0.0357 using a two-tailed t test. Sample size for A–E: WT = 30 and KO = 34 main MF boutons. F, Quantification of the number of SVs in complete synapses. Sample size for F: WT = 55 and KO = 42 synapses. G, Quantification of the number of SVs in partial synapses. Sample size for G: WT = 150 and KO = 131 synapses. For all graphs: Unless noted, p > 0.05 (Table 1). Error bars show mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Kirrel3 regulates MF filopodial synapses with GABA neurons, but not CA3 neurons. A,B, 2D (A) and 3D (B) example of a GABA dendrite (green) with simple spine-like protrusions and no PSDs with main MF boutons. Dotted line in B shows the location of slice shown in A. C,D, 2D (C) and 3D (D) example of a CA3 neuron (orange) with multiheaded TE spines and many PSDs with main MF boutons. Dotted line in D shows the location of slice shown in C. E,F, Representative images of complete MF filopodial synapses made onto a GABA dendritic shaft (E) and a GABA spine (F). MF filopodia (blue), GABA dendrite (green), synapses indicated by white arrows. G,H, Representative images of complete MF filopodial synapses made onto a second CA3 dendritic shaft (G) and a CA3 TE (H). Main MF bouton and MF filopodia (blue), CA3 dendrite and TEs (orange), second CA3 dendrite (yellow), synapses indicated by white arrows. I–L, Quantification of MF filopodial synapses onto different types of postsynaptic neurons. I, Percentage of wildtype or Kirrel3 knockout MF filopodia making complete synapses with indicated postsynaptic partner type. J, Number of complete MF filopodial synapses onto GABA neurons per main MF bouton. **p = 0.0075 by Mann-Whitney test. K, Number of complete MF filopodial synapses onto CA3 neurons per main MF bouton. L, Including only the MF filopodia that make a complete synapse, the percentage of each partner type is shown. Sample size for I–L: WT = 30 and KO = 34 main MF boutons. Unless indicated p > 0.05. M–P, Comparison of the morphology of filopodia synapsing with GABA versus CA3 neurons in wildtype and Kirrel3 knockout mice using the Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple comparisons. M, Volume of filopodia in μm3. GABA WT to KO *p = 0.0419, CA3 WT to KO *p = 0.0507. N, Length of filopodia in micrometers. *p = 0.0299. O, Cross sectional area in square micrometers. p > 0.05. P, Number of SVs per synapse. p > 0.05. Sample size for M–O: WT GABA = 20, KO GABA = 4, WT CA3 = 27, KO CA3 = 31. Sample size for P: WT GABA = 20, KO GABA = 5, WT CA3 = 27, KO CA3 = 33. For entire figure, error bars show mean ± SEM. Scale bars, 1 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Kirrel3 does not regulate en passant synapse density. A–C, 3D example (A) of a spiny GABA dendrite targeted by en passant synapses from two separate DG axons. Synapses magnified in B, C. GABA dendrite (green), DG axon (yellow), en passant synapse (pink). D, Percentage of en passant synapses made onto GABA and CA3 dendrites from 73 WT and 68 KO DG axon segments. E, Table reporting the number of en passant synapses per millimeter axon. Scale bars, 1 μm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Additional morphologic features of MF circuits. A, Table reporting the percentage of wildtype and Kirrel3 knockout MF filopodia with indicated features. B, C, Representative 2D (B) and 3D (C) example of a MF filopodia ending in a growth cone-like structure. D, 3D example of a branched MF filopodia. White arrow indicates branch point. E, Quantification of the number of branching MF filopodia per main MF bouton. Sample size: WT = 30 and KO = 34 main MF boutons. p > 0.05. Error bars show mean ± SEM. F–H. 3D example of one MF filopodia making multiple synapses onto one GABA neuron (F), synapses magnified in G, H shown in 2D. Main MF bouton with associated MF filopodia (blue), GABA dendrite (green), synapses (red). Scale bars, 1 μm.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Movies
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Statistics

    GraphData structureType of testp value
    Figure 2ANonparametricMann-Whitney test0.5102
    Figure 2BNormal distributionUnpaired t test0.1323
    Figure 2CNormal distributionKolmogorov-Smirnov test0.2360
    Figure 3BNormal distributionUnpaired t test0.9781
    Figure 3CNormal distributionUnpaired t test0.1140
    Figure 3DNonparametricMann-Whitney test0.2061
    Figure 3ENormal distributionUnpaired t test0.0357
    Figure 3FNonparametricMann-Whitney test0.2595
    Figure 3GNonparametricMann-Whitney test0.8720
    Figure 4JNonparametricMann-Whitney test0.0075
    Figure 4KNonparametricMann-Whitney test0.7906
    Figure 4MNonparametricKruskal-Wallis test0.0051
    Figure 4NNonparametricKruskal-Wallis test0.0153
    Figure 4ONonparametricKruskal-Wallis test0.0973
    Figure 4PNonparametricKruskal-Wallis test0.1268
    Figure 6ENonparametricMann-Whitney test0.5208

Movies

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Movie 1.

    >MF presynaptic complex shown in Figure 1B,C.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 3
May/June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Examining Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses by 3D Electron Microscopy in Wildtype and Kirrel3 Knockout Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Examining Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses by 3D Electron Microscopy in Wildtype and Kirrel3 Knockout Mice
E. Anne Martin, Derek Woodruff, Randi L. Rawson, Megan E. Williams
eNeuro 22 May 2017, 4 (3) ENEURO.0088-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0088-17.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Examining Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses by 3D Electron Microscopy in Wildtype and Kirrel3 Knockout Mice
E. Anne Martin, Derek Woodruff, Randi L. Rawson, Megan E. Williams
eNeuro 22 May 2017, 4 (3) ENEURO.0088-17.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0088-17.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • electron microscopy
  • hippocampus
  • Kirrel3
  • mossy fiber
  • Reconstruction
  • synapse

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Development

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.