Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Efficient Remyelination Requires DNA Methylation

Sarah Moyon, Dan Ma, Jimmy L. Huynh, David J.C. Coutts, Chao Zhao, Patrizia Casaccia and Robin J.M. Franklin
eNeuro 20 March 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0336-16.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0336-16.2017
Sarah Moyon
1Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah Moyon
Dan Ma
4Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dan Ma
Jimmy L. Huynh
1Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
2Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J.C. Coutts
4Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David J.C. Coutts
Chao Zhao
4Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chao Zhao
Patrizia Casaccia
1Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
2Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
3Neuroscience Initiative Advanced Science Research Center, CUNY, New York, NY 10031
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patrizia Casaccia
Robin J.M. Franklin
4Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    DNA methyltransferases are differently expressed in adult OPCs during remyelination. A, Schematic of the lysolecithin-induced focal demyelination and of the area of NWM used for quantification. B, Representative DNMT1, NKX2.2, and CC1 stainings in NWM and at 5, 14, and 21 dpl (white arrowheads indicate double-positive cells). C, Quantification of the number of double DNMT1+ and NKX2.2+ cells at 5, 14, and 21 dpl, compared with NWMa. D, Quantification of the percentage of double DNMT1+ and NKX2.2+ or CC1+ cells at 5, 14, and 21 dpl, compared with NWMb. E, Representative DNMT3A, NKX2.2, and CC1 stainings in NWM and at 5, 14, and 21 dpl (white arrowheads indicate double-positive cells). F, Quantification of the number of double DNMT3A+ and CC1+ cells at 5, 14, and 21 dpl, compared with NWMc. G, Quantification of the percentage of double DNMT3A+ and NKX2.2+ or CC1+ cells at 5, 14, and 21 dpl, compared with NWMd. H, Representative 5mC and OLIG2 staining in NWM and at 5, 14, and 21 dpl (white arrowheads indicate high-5mC+/OLIG2+ cells). Representative low-, medium-, and high-5mC cells are shown below. I, Quantification of low-, medium-, and high-5mC levels in OLIG2+ cells at 5, 14, and 21 dpl, compared with NWMe. Scale bar = 20 µm. Data are mean ± SEM. n = 4–6 animals, three sections per animal. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (ANOVA).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Ablation of Dnmt1 or Dnmt3a does not impair oligodendrocyte differentiation or their methylation levels in control conditions. A, Representative OLIG2 and CC1 staining in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl NWM spinal cords. B, Quantification of OLIG2+ and CC1+ cell densities in NWMf (p = 0.3537, p = 0.3803). C, Representative OLIG2 and CC1 staining in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt3afl/fl NWM spinal cords. D, Quantification of OLIG2+ and CC1+ cell densities in NWMg (p = 0.8926, p = 0.5109). E, Representative OLIG2 and CC1 staining in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl NWM spinal cords. F, Quantification of OLIG2+ and CC1+ cell densities in NWMh (p = 0.3136, p = 0.2173). G, Representative 5mC and OLIG2 stainings in tamoxifen-treated PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl, PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt3afl/fl, and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl NWM spinal cords (white arrowheads indicate high-5mC+/OLIG2+ cells). H, Quantification of low-, medium-, and high-5mC levels in OLIG2+ cells in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl NWMj. I, Quantification of low-, medium-, and high-5mC levels in OLIG2+ cells in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt3afl/fl NWMjj. J, Quantification of low-, medium-, and high-5mC levels in OLIG2+ cells in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl NWMk. Scale bar = 50 µm. Data are mean ± SEM. n = 4–6 animals, three sections per animal (Student’s t test, ANOVA).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Ablation of Dnmt3a and both Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a impairs oligodendrocyte differentiation during remyelination. A, Representative OLIG2 and CC1 staining at 14 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl spinal cords. B, Quantification of OLIG2+ and CC1+ cell densities and CC1+/OLIG2+ cells percentage at 14 dpll (p = 0.7955, p = 0.3573, p = 0.9689). C, Representative OLIG2 and CC1 staining at 14 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt3afl/fl spinal cords. D, Quantification of OLIG2+ and CC1+ cell densities and CC1+/OLIG2+ cells percentage at 14 dplm (p = 0.7851, p = 0.0550, p = 0.0149). E, Representative OLIG2 and CC1 staining at 14 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl spinal cords. F, Quantification of OLIG2+ and CC1+ cell densities and CC1+/OLIG2+ cells percentage at 14 dpln (p = 0.1510, p = 0.0357, p = 0.0006). G, Quantification of DNMT1 and DNMT3A expression in CC1+ cells at 14 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl, Plp+ / +;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt3afl/fl, Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl spinal cords, to detect eventual compensation between DNMTs at the protein level° (p = 0.0075, p = 0.0505, p = 0.0074, p = 0.0053, p = 0.0072, p = 0.0012). Scale bar = 20 µm. Data are mean ± SEM. n = 4–6 animals, three sections per animal. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t test).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Ablation of Dnmt3a and both Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a impairs methylation levels in oligodendroglial cells during remyelination. A, Representative 5mC and OLIG2 staining at 14 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl spinal cords (white arrowheads indicate high-5mC+/OLIG2+ cells). B, Quantification of low-, medium-, and high-5mC levels in OLIG2+ cells at 14dplp. C, Representative 5mC and OLIG2 staining at 14 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt3afl/fl spinal cords (white arrowheads indicate high-5mC+/OLIG2+ cells). D, Quantification of low-, medium-, and high-5mC levels in OLIG2+ cells at 14dplq. E, Representative 5mC and OLIG2 staining at 14 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl spinal cords (white arrowheads indicate high-5mC+/OLIG2+ cells). F, Quantification of low-, medium-, and high-5mC levels in OLIG2+ cells at 14 dplr. Scale bar = 100 µm. Data are mean ± SEM. n = 4–6 animals, three sections per animal. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (ANOVA).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Ablation of Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a impairs remyelination in the adult spinal cord. A, Representative semithin sections at 21 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl spinal cords. B, Relative ranking of remyelinations (p = 0.3075). C, Quantification of g-ratios for control and mutants mice, and plot of g-ratios against axonal diametert (p = 0.9426). D, Representative semithin sections at 21 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt3afl/fl spinal cords. E, Relative ranking of remyelinationu (p = 0.7144). F, Quantification of g-ratios for control and mutants mice, and plot of g-ratios against axonal diameterv (p = 0.1079). G, Representative semithin sections at 21 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl spinal cords. H, Relative ranking of remyelinationx (p = 0.7584). I, Quantification of g-ratios for control and mutants mice, and plot of g-ratios against axonal diametery (p = 0.0005). J, Representative electron microscopic sections at 21 dpl in tamoxifen-treated Plp+ / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl and PlpcreER(t) / +;Dnmt1fl/fl;Dnmt3afl/fl spinal cords revealing new thin myelin sheaths of remyelination (arrows) and a demyelinated axon (arrowhead). Scale bar = 10 µm. Dots are ranking for each mouse (B, E, H) and g-ratio for each quantified axon (C, F, I). Data are mean ± SEM. n = 3–5 animals, >70 axons per animal. ***p < 0.01 (Mann–Whitney test and Student’s t test).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Statistical analysis

    CodeData structureType of test95% CI
    a (Fig. 1C)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests108.6 to 272.7, –27.42 to 136.7 and –73.69 to 90.40
    b (Fig. 1D)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests51.11 to 98.17 and 11.76 to 58.82 (5dpl); 33.78 to 80.84 and –11.49 to 35.57 (14dpl); 25.89 to 72.95 and –14.29 to 32.77 (21dpl)
    c (Fig. 1F)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests45.42 to 116.2, 176.9 to 247.7 and 133.9 to 204.7
    d (Fig. 1G)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests–2.914 to 37.65 and 60.67 to 101.2 (5dpl); –5.602 to 34.96 and 77.53 to 118.1 (14dpl); –13.63 to 26.93 and 53.74 to 94.30 (21dpl)
    e (Fig.1I)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests–73.29 to –34.94, –70.07 to –31.72 and –85.01 to –46.66 (low); 19.25 to 57.60, 8.444 to 46.79 and 16.22 to 54.56 (medium); –4.294 to 34.05, 4.099 to 42.45, 11.27 to 49.62 (high)
    f (Fig. 2B)Normal distribution, equal variancesStudent’s t-test201.1 to 231.7 (OLIG2+), 191.3 to 215.4 (CC1+)
    g (Fig. 2D)Normal distribution, equal variancesStudent’s t-test210.2 to 205.7 (OLIG2+), 203.9 to 189.2 (CC1+)
    h (Fig. 2F)Normal distribution, equal variancesStudent’s t-test178.2 to 144.9 (OLIG2+), 165.7 to 136.2 (CC1+)
    i (Fig.2H)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests70.83 to 72.29 (low); 15.67 to 13.36 (medium); 13.50 to 14.35 (high)
    j (Fig.2I)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests77.96 to 65.61 (low); 15.85 to 23.22 (medium); 6.186 to 11.17 (high)
    k (Fig.2J)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests67.91 to 58.45 (low); 21.32 to 31.39 (medium); 10.77 to 10.16 (high)
    l (Fig. 3B)Normal distribution, equal variancesStudent’s t-test–307.8 to 246.4 (OLIG2+), –249.9 to 105.2 (CC1+) and –16.51 to 17.07 (CC1+/OLIG2+)
    m (Fig. 3D)Normal distribution, equal variancesStudent’s t-test–341.1 to 431.1 (OLIG2+), 13.87 to 270.7 (CC1+) and 2.758 to 17.22 (CC1+/OLIG2+)
    n (Fig. 3F)Normal distribution, equal variancesStudent’s t-test–275.5 to 52.4 (OLIG2+), 12.91 to 264.6 (CC1+) and 17.64 to 38.55 (CC1+/OLIG2+)
    ° (Fig. 3G)Normal distribution, equal variancesStudent’s t-test36.15 to 226.8 (DNMT1) and –136.3 to 15.88 (DNMT3A); –134.3 to –21.63 (DNMT1) and 48.69 to 246.2 (DNMT3A); 51.76 to 317.0 (DNMT1) and 106.9 to 307.9 (DNMT3A)
    p (Fig.4B)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests22.94 to 25.45 (low); 59.72 to 59.83 (medium); 17.33 to 14.72 (high)
    q (Fig.4D)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests22.71 to 31.26 (low); 58.99 to 55.91 (medium); 18.30 to 12.83 (high)
    r (Fig.4F)Normal distribution, equal variancesANOVA and Bonferroni posttests21.26 to 37.88 (low); 61.43 to 49.48 (medium); 17.31 to 12.64 (high)
    s (Fig. 5B)Nonnormal distributionNonparametric Mann Whitney test2.648 to 11.35 and 1.362 to 7.838
    t (Fig. 5C)Normal distribution, unequal variancesStudent’s t-test with Welch’s correction–0.005297 to 0.005700
    u (Fig. 5E)Nonnormal distributionNonparametric Mann Whitney test1.823 to 11.38 and 2.191 to 9.142
    v (Fig. 5F)Normal distribution, unequal variancesStudent’s t-test with Welch’s correction–0.001182 to 0.01204
    x (Fig. 5H)Nonnormal distributionNonparametric Mann Whitney test–1.006 to 9.256 and 2.886 to 6.864
    y (Fig. 5G)Normal distribution, unequal variancesStudent’s t-test with Welch’s correction–0.01370 to –0.003870
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 2
March/April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficient Remyelination Requires DNA Methylation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Efficient Remyelination Requires DNA Methylation
Sarah Moyon, Dan Ma, Jimmy L. Huynh, David J.C. Coutts, Chao Zhao, Patrizia Casaccia, Robin J.M. Franklin
eNeuro 20 March 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0336-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0336-16.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Efficient Remyelination Requires DNA Methylation
Sarah Moyon, Dan Ma, Jimmy L. Huynh, David J.C. Coutts, Chao Zhao, Patrizia Casaccia, Robin J.M. Franklin
eNeuro 20 March 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0336-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0336-16.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Adult Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells
  • DNA methylation
  • remyelination

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • A Multi-Network Approach Identifies Proteins Related to Dendritic Spines in Alzheimer's Disease
  • Epigenetic and transcriptomic impacts of ethanol vary by brain region and extent of exposure
  • Parvalbumin Neuron–Targeted Loss of Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Gene BIN1 Is Insufficient to Drive Cognitive or Network Excitability Changes
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.