Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

An Aversive Response to Osmotic Upshift in Caenorhabditis elegans

Jingyi Yu, Wenxing Yang, He Liu, Yingsong Hao and Yun Zhang
eNeuro 6 April 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0282-16.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0282-16.2017
Jingyi Yu
1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wenxing Yang
1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wenxing Yang
He Liu
1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yingsong Hao
2Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
3Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yingsong Hao
Yun Zhang
1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    C. elegans generates an aversive response to mild osmotic upshifts. A, A sample image of the droplet assay (Materials and Methods). Each 6 µl droplet of buffer contains one worm, and the arrow denotes a large body bend. B, WT animals that are cultivated under the standard osmotic condition (∼150 mOsm) display a stable turning rate in a glycerol solution of 150 mOsm but gradually and significantly increase the turning rate in a hyperosmotic glycerol solution of 400 mOsm. n = 55 each. C, WT animals that are cultivated under the standard osmotic conditions (∼150 mOsm) display a significantly lower thrashing speed in a hyperosmotic glycerol solutions of 400 mOsm than in a glycerol solution of 150 mOsm. n = 55 each. D, E, WT animals that are cultivated under the standard osmotic condition (∼150 mOsm) also gradually and significantly increase the turning rate in the hyperosmotic glycerol solutions of 600 mOsm (D; n = 27 each) or 800 mOsm (E; n = 12 each). Note that in E the turning rate starts to drop after 3 min in the 800 mOsm solution, due to decreased mobility of the animals possibly caused by server dehydration. Therefore, the statistical test is performed on the turning rates in the 4th minute in E. F, G, WT animals cultivated under the standard osmotic condition (∼150 mOsm) display an increased turning rate in a 400 mOsm hyperosmotic solution that is balanced by either NaCl (F; n = 24 each) or sorbitol (G; n = 24 each) in comparison with the turning rate in the 150 mOsm solution. For B–G, the turning rates in solutions of different osmolarities in the 5th minute (in the 4th minute in E) are compared using the Student’s t test. H, WT animals that are cultivated under the standard osmotic condition (∼150 mOsm) display a stable turning rate on a NGM plate of 150 mOsm but gradually and significantly increase the turning rate on a NGM plate of 400 mOsm. The osmolarity of the plates is balanced by sorbitol. The turning rates on plates of different osmolarity are compared using the Student’s t test. n = 7 animals each. For all, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. WT, wild type.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The increase in the turning rate is part of the physiologic response to hyperosmotic stresses. A, Wild-type animals cultivated under the standard NGM plates of 150 mOsm display a higher turning rate in a hyperosmotic solution of 400 mOsm (NGM_400 mOsm, n = 32) than in a 200 mOsm solution (NGM_200 mOsm, n = 28); but animals that are cultivated on the plates of 400 mOsm display a turning rate in the solution of 400 mOsm (adapted_400 mOsm, n = 32) that is similar to that in the solution of 200 mOsm (adapted_200 mOsm, n = 32). Significant interaction between cultivating conditions and osmolarity is tested by two-way ANOVA. B, The osr-1(rm1) mutant animals do not display an increased turning rate in the hyperosmotic solution of 400 mOsm (n = 29) compared with the turning rate in 150 mOsm (n = 28). Both the mutant and WT animals are cultivated under the standard osmotic condition of 150 mOsm. n = 29 and 31 for wild-type animals tested in solutions of 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively. C, The dpy-2(e8) mutant animals do not display an increased turning rate in the hyperosmotic solution of 400 mOsm (n = 16) compared with the turning rate in 150 mOsm (n = 16). Both the mutant and wild-type animals are cultivated under the standard osmotic condition of 150 mOsm. n = 16 for WT animals tested in each condition. For B and C, significant interaction between genotype and osmolarity is tested by two-way ANOVA. For all, ***p < 0.001. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. WT, wild type.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The cGMP-gated channel subunit TAX-2 acts in the AQR, PQR, and URX neurons to regulate the aversive response to osmotic upshifts. A, The mutant animals osm-9(ky10) cultivated under the standard condition display an increased turning rate in the hyperosmotic solution of 400 mOsm that is similar to that of WT animals. n = 31 and 29 WT animals tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; n = 32 and 31 osm-9 animals tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively. B, C, Two mutation alleles of tax-2, p691 and p671, are severely defective in increasing the turning rate in response to the osmotic upshift from 150 to 400 mOsm, compared with WT animals. For B, n = 24 WT animals were tested in either 150 or 400 mOsm and n = 20 and 24 p691 animals were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; for C, n = 23 and 24 WT animals were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively, and n = 21 and 27 p671 animals were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively. D, E, Expressing the genomic DNA fragment containing the coding region and regulatory sequences of tax-2 (Ptax-2::tax-2) rescues the defects in both tax-2 alleles. For D, n = 32 and 31 WT animals tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; n = 29 and 31 transgenic animals expressing Ptax-2::tax-2 tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; and n = 28 and 26 p691 mutant sibling animals tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; for E, n = 31 and 32 WT animals were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; n = 31 and 32 transgenic animals expressing Ptax-2::tax-2 were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; and n = 30 p671 mutant sibling animals were tested in either 150 or 400 mOsm. F, Expressing the wild-type tax-2 cDNA in the body cavity sensory neurons AQR, PQR, URX (Pgcy-36::tax-2) rescues the defects in the tax-2(p691) mutants in generating an increased turning rate in response to the osmotic upshift from 150 to 400 mOsm. n = 24 and 22 WT animals tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively, n = 22 and 24 transgenic animals expressing Pgcy-36::tax-2 tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively, n = 23 and 24 p691 mutant sibling animals tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively. G, Expressing cell death-promoting molecule EGL-1 in the body cavity sensory neurons AQR, PQR, and URX (Pgcy-36::egl-1) abolished the increased turning rate in response to the osmotic upshift from 200 to 400 mOsm. n = 36 and 44 WT animals were tested in 200 and 400 mOsm, respectively; n = 40 and 44 transgenic animals expressing Pgcy-36::eg-1 were tested in 200 and 400 mOsm, respectively. H, The heat map of the calcium signals in the URX neuron in individual animals that were exposed to 150 mOsm and switched to 400 mOsm and in individual animals that were exposed to 150 mOsm and switched to 150 mOsm. The calcium signal was presented as the percentage change in GCaMP6 signal using the average GCaMP6 signal in the first 60 s as the baseline [(F − Fbase)/Fbase * 100%; see Materials and Methods]. I, The average change in the GCaMP6 signal in URX is significantly higher when animals are switched from 150 to 400 mOsm (n = 15) than when animals are switched from 150 to 150 mOsm (n = 13). Box plot shows the first and third quartile, median, and the maximum and minimum. The Student’s t test was used for comparison. For A–C and G, significant interaction between genotype (wild-type vs mutant animals) and osmolarity is tested with two-way ANOVA; for D–F, significant interaction between genotype (transgenic vs nontransgenic siblings) and osmolarity is tested with two-way ANOVA. For all, animals are cultivated under the standard NGM plates with an osmotic condition of 150 mOsm. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. n.s., Not significant. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. WT, wild type.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    The neural circuit underlying navigation regulates the aversive response to osmotic upshifts. A, Inhibiting the activity of the interneurons AIB and AIY by expressing twk-18(gf) produces significant defects in generating an increased turning rate in response to the osmotic upshift from 150 to 400 mOsm. n = 40 and 38 transgenic animals expressing twk-18(gf) in AIB and AIY were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; and n = 40 and 38 WT sibling animals were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively. B, Inhibiting AIB, AIY, and AIZ by expressing twk-18(gf) produces significant defects in generating an increased turning rate in response to the osmotic upshift from 150 to 400 mOsm. n = 40 and 33 transgenic animals expressing twk-18(gf) in AIB, AIY, and AIZ were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively; n = 40 and 39 WT sibling animals were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively. C, Blocking the neural transmission of several command interneurons and motor neurons by expressing the tetanus toxin with the glr-1 promoter produces significant defects in generating an increased turning rate in response to the osmotic upshift from 150 to 400 mOsm. n = 24 animals in all conditions. D, Blocking the neural transmission of several motor neurons by expressing the tetanus toxin with the lad-2 promoter produces significant defects in generating an increased turning rate in response to the osmotic upshift from 150 to 400 mOsm. n = 23 transgenic animals expressing the tetanus toxin with the lad-2 promoter were tested in either 150 or 400 mOsm; and n = 22 and 23 WT sibling animals were tested in 150 and 400 mOsm, respectively. For all, animals are cultivated on the standard NGM plates with an osmotic condition of 150 mOsm, and the significant interaction between genotype (transgenic vs nontransgenic siblings) and osmolarity is tested using two-way ANOVA, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01. Values are reported as the mean ± SEM. WT, wild type.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Preparation of testing solutions

    Balancing soluteCalculated osmolarity (mOsm)Measured osmolarity (mOsm)
    Glycerol150144
    400415
    600621
    800838
    NaCl150144
    400369
    Sorbitol150141
    400373
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Channels examined for osmotic upshifts

    Mutated geneGene familyNumber of turns/min for the 5th minutep value
    Wild-type controlMutant
    150 mOsm400 mOsm150 mOsm400 mOsm
    aqp-1Aquaporin9.50 ± 1.20 (16)27.50 ± 1.79 (16)13.56 ± 2.48 (16)33.80 ± 3.09 (15)0.617
    aqp-2Aquaporin10.88 ± 2.67 (8)16.63 ± 3.68 (8)8.00 ± 2.03 (8)20.14 ± 4.98 (7)0.357
    aqp-3Aquaporin5.93 ± 0.91 (15)21.87 ± 1.67 (15)6.00 ± 1.04 (14)16.87 ± 2.25 (15)0.114
    aqp-4Aquaporin8.44 ± 0.93 (16)21.94 ± 1.87 (16)9.94 ± 1.40 (16)29.38 ± 3.15 (16)0.146
    aqp-6Aquaporin10.25 ± 1.80 (8)28.38 ± 2.04 (8)7.50 ± 1.38 (8)28.13 ± 3.70 (8)0.606
    aqp-7Aquaporin10.33 ± 1.54 (12)29.00 ± 1.62 (16)9.19 ± 1.68 (16)23.06 ± 1.68 (16)0.156
    aqp-8Aquaporin9.31 ± 1.76 (16)24.63 ± 2.40 (16)12.17 ± 1.40 (12)27.44 ± 2.93 (16)0.993
    aqp-9Aquaporin11.5 ± 1.24 (32)33.16 ± 1.44 (32)11.78 ± 1.31 (32)27.41 ± 1.35 (32)0.026
    aqp-10Aquaporin9.50 ± 1.20 (16)27.50 ± 1.79 (16)6.63 ± 0.80 (16)25.67 ± 1.67 (15)0.714
    aqp-11Aquaporin8.44 ± 0.93 (16)21.94 ± 1.87 (16)7.88 ± 0.74 (16)25.56 ± 2.22 (16)0.187
    asic-1Epithelial sodium channel (ENaC)13.25 ± 0.95 (36)29.49 ± 1.47 (37)14.74 ± 1.12 (35)32.05 ± 1.29 (39)0.664
    mec-4Epithelial sodium channel (ENaC)16.59 ± 1.48 (32)31.29 ± 1.58 (28)20.11 ± 2.05 (28)35.72 ± 1.57 (32)0.784
    trp-4Transient receptor potential (TRP) channel11.17 ± 1.02 (15)32.29 ± 2.06 (15)14.54 ± 1.93 (15)35.42 ± 1.91 (15)0.944
    tmc-1Transmembrane channel-like protein14.75 ± 1.09 (24)27.83 ± 1.89 (24)12.29 ± 1.20 (24)29.92 ± 1.39 (24)0.115
    tmc-2Transmembrane channel-like protein12.75 ± 1.29 (20)28.32 ± 2.15 (22)10.63 ± 0.98 (24)26.09 ± 1.96 (23)0.975
    tax-4Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel10.25 ± 1.15 (28)22.32 ± 1.35 (28)11.22 ± 1.13 (27)20.86 ± 1.12 (28)0.309
    • Values are reported as the mean ± SEM (n animals tested). Mutants with mutations in several channel-encoding genes are examined. The number of turns per minute is shown for the 5th minute for each genotype and osmolarity treatment. The interaction of genotype and treatment is tested with two-way ANOVA on the number of turns per minute in the 5th minute. The number of animals tested under each condition is indicated in the parenthesis next to mean ± SEM.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Sensory neurons examined for osmotic upshifts

    Mutated gene/transgeneAffected neuronsNumber of turns/min for the 5th minutep value
    Wild-type controlMutant/transgenic
    200# mOsm400 mOsm200# mOsm400 mOsm
    ttx-1AFD10.40 ± 0.79 (30)22.20 ± 2.35 (20)9.86 ± 0.80 (28)21.15 ± 1.86 (27)0.863
    che-1ASE14.36 ± 1.21 (28)30.31 ± 1.72 (32)18.19 ± 1.62 (32)28.28 ± 1.41(32)0.057
    Psrh-142::twk-18ADF6.75 ± 0.73 (8)26.00 ± 2.41 (8)8.57 ± 1.65 (7)24.25 ± 1.47 (8)0.298
    • Values are reported as the mean ± SEM (n animals tested). Mutants defective in the development and/or function of several sensory neurons are examined for osmotic upshifts. ttx-1 and che-1, as well as the wild-type controls for these two mutants, are tested at 200 and 400 mOsm for osmotic upshifts. The transgenic animals that express Psrh-142::twk-18(gf) and the nontransgenic siblings are tested at 150 and 400 mOsm for osmotic upshifts. The number of turns per minute is shown for the 5th minute for each genotype and osmolarity treatment. The interaction of genotype and treatment is tested with two-way ANOVA on the number of turns per minute in the 5th minute. The number of animals tested under each condition is indicated in the parenthesis next to mean ± SEM.

    • ↵# ttx-1 and che-1, as well as the wild-type controls for these two mutants, were tested at 200 and 400 mOsm for osmotic upshifts. The transgenic animals that express Psrh-142::twk-18(gf) and the nontransgenic siblings are tested at 150 and 400 mOsm for osmotic upshifts.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Cell-specific rescue of tax-2 mutants examined for osmotic upshifts

    Genetic backgroundTransgeneExpressing neuronsNumber of turns/min for the 5th minute
    Mean ± SEM (n)
    p value
    Nontransgenic controlTransgenic animals
    150 mOsm400 mOsm150 mOsm400 mOsm
    tax-2(p691)Podr-1::tax-2AWB, AWC5.66 ± 0.69 (29)9.33 ± 0.89 (30)7.63 ± 1.15 (27)9.86 ± 1.11 (28)0.560
    tax-2(p691)Pstr-3::tax-2ASI6.84 ± 0.61 (31)12.31 ± 1.25 (32)8.55 ± 0.83 (31)17.14 ± 2.04 (29)0.565
    • Values are reported as the mean ± SEM (n animals tested). Transgenic animals that express a wild-type tax-2 cDNA in the major olfactory sensory neurons AWB and AWC (Podr-1::tax-2) or in the sensory neuron ASI (Pstr-3::tax-2) in the tax-2(p691) mutant background are examined for osmotic upshifts. The number of turns per minute is shown for the 5th minute for each genotype (transgenic vs nontransgenic siblings) and osmolarity treatment. The interaction of genotype and treatment is tested with two-way ANOVA on the number of turns per minute in the 5th minute. The number of animals tested under each condition is indicated in the parenthesis next to mean ± SEM.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    G-Protein pathway components examined for osmotic upshifts

    Mutated geneExpressing neurons+Number of turns/min for the 5th minutep value
    Wild-type controlMutant
    150 mOsm400 mOsm150 mOsm400 mOsm
    gpa-8AQR, PQR, URX9.58 ± 1.02 (24)24.61 ± 1.51 (23)7.33 ± 0.85 (21)20.67 ± 1.89 (21)0.538
    gpa-13PQR7.19 ± 1.13 (16)16.13 ± 2.91 (15)9.63 ± 2.23 (16)21.69 ± 1.98 (16)0.467
    gcy-1URX8.19 ± 1.50 (16)29.00 ± 1.91 (16)5.88 ± 1.01 (16)25.31 ± 2.22 (16)0.691
    gcy-25AQR, PQR, URX11.07 ± 1.52 (15)26.73 ± 2.10 (15)8.50 ± 1.10 (16)23.13 ± 1.26 (16)0.734
    gcy-28Widely expressed9.31 ± 1.76 (16)24.63 ± 2.40 (16)9.00 ± 1.14 (16)32.06 ± 2.18 (16)0.049#
    gcy-32AQR, PQR, URX11.06 ± 1.80 (16)27.60 ± 1.77 (15)7.71 ± 0.71 (14)25.81 ± 1.61 (16)0.622
    gcy-33AQR, PQR, URX10.94 ± 2.24 (16)22.88 ± 2.67 (16)8.88 ± 1.13 (16)18.87 ± 2.34 (15)0.655
    gcy-34AQR, PQR, URX7.33 ± 0.84 (15)22.94 ± 2.14 (16)7.73 ± 1.01 (15)20.19 ± 2.37 (16)0.377
    gcy-35AQR, PQR, URX9.83 ± 1.39 (23)30.08 ± 1.25 (24)9.68 ± 1.26 (22)28.46 ± 1.40 (24)0.578
    gcy-36AQR, PQR, URX9.83 ± 1.39 (23)30.08 ± 1.25 (24)8.42 ± 1.18 (24)27.39 ± 1.99 (23)0.665
    gcy-37AQR, PQR, URX9.94 ± 1.25 (16)26.69 ± 2.15 (16)6.93 ± 0.73 (15)21.87 ± 2.14 (15)0.592
    • Values are reported as the mean ± SEM (n animals tested). Mutants that are mutated for genes that encode G-protein pathway components and are expressed in AQR, PQR, and URX are examined. The number of turns per minute is shown for the 5th minute for each genotype and osmolarity treatment. The interaction of genotype and treatment is tested with two-way ANOVA on the number of turns per minute in the 5th minute. The number of animals tested under each condition is indicated in the parenthesis next to mean ± SEM.

    • ↵+ Only the expression in AQR, PQR or URX neurons is indicated.

    • ↵# The rate of turns increases more in the mutant than in the wild-type control.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Interneurons and motor neurons examined for osmotic upshifts

    TransgeneAffected neuronsNumber of turns/min for the 5th minutep value
    Nontransgenic controlTransgenic worms
    150 mOsm400 mOsm150 mOsm400 mOsm
    Podr-2b(3a)::twk-18(gf)AIB, AIZ9.38 ± 1.19 (16)25.69 ± 1.96 (16)5.63 ± 1.38 (16)22.60 ± 2.24 (15)0.848
    Pinx-1::twk-18(gf)AIB7.44 ± 1.19 (16)29.31 ± 2.22 (16)1.63 ± 0.51 (16)26.56 ± 2.04 (16)0.355
    Pttx-3::twk-18(gf)AIY7.81 ± 0.99 (16)25.06 ± 2.26 (16)7.56 ± 1.08 (16)23.40 ± 1.92 (15)0.669
    • Values are reported as the mean ± SEM (n animals tested). Transgenic animals that express a gain-of-function isoform of the potassium channel TWK-18 to inhibit the activity of specific interneurons and/or motor neurons are examined. The number of turns per minute is shown for the 5th minute for each genotype (transgenic vs nontransgenic siblings) and osmolarity treatment. The interaction of genotype and treatment is tested with two-way ANOVA on the number of turns per minute in the 5th minute. The number of animals tested under each condition is indicated in the parenthesis next to mean ± SEM.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 2
March/April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Aversive Response to Osmotic Upshift in Caenorhabditis elegans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
An Aversive Response to Osmotic Upshift in Caenorhabditis elegans
Jingyi Yu, Wenxing Yang, He Liu, Yingsong Hao, Yun Zhang
eNeuro 6 April 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0282-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0282-16.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
An Aversive Response to Osmotic Upshift in Caenorhabditis elegans
Jingyi Yu, Wenxing Yang, He Liu, Yingsong Hao, Yun Zhang
eNeuro 6 April 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0282-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0282-16.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cGMP-Gated Channel
  • Osmotic Stimuli
  • Sensorimotor Response

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Different But Complementary Motor Functions Reveal an Asymmetric Recalibration of Upper Limb Bimanual Coordination
  • Serotonergic Suppression of Sustained Synaptic Responses in Rat Oculomotor Neural Integrator Networks
  • Spatially Extensive LFP Correlations Identify Slow-Wave Sleep in Marmoset Sensorimotor Cortex
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.