Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Cortical Activation Patterns Evoked by Temporally Asymmetric Sounds and Their Modulation by Learning

Junsei Horikawa and Hisayuki Ojima
eNeuro 14 April 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0241-16.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0241-16.2017
Junsei Horikawa
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering Graduate School of Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Hibarigaoka 1-1, Tempaku, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8580, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hisayuki Ojima
2Cognitive Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hisayuki Ojima
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The stimulus sound segments, F and revF, used for behavioral training and optical imaging. Sound stimuli are presented to animals as a train of four-time repeated F or revF segments in the optical imaging. A, The F segment is a normal natural sound (footstep sound) and the revF segment is its time-reversed version. B, The power spectrum (left) and sonogram (right) of the F segment. Note that the F and revF segments have an identical long-term power spectrum according to the Fourier transformation (Patterson, 1994a,b).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Tonotopic activation of the primary auditory cortex by a set of pure tones. Pure tones with a 200-ms duration and 5-ms onset/offset cosine ramps are reproduced at frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 kHz at 75-dB SPL in otherwise the similar manner to the asymmetric sound pair. On a conventional light micrograph (lower right), covering the anterior part of the guinea pig’s AI, the optical image frame (square) is superimposed. The approximate borders between the AI and DC field and those between the core AI and the belt VA are depicted by dotted lines. Thick blood vessels (a set of arrows) course along the pseudosylvian sulcus. Dots point to the maxima of activation evoked by different tones. For the tone-evoked activation maps, refer to Figure 3.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Temporal and spatial patterns of activation evoked by the temporally asymmetric sound pair. A, Differential optical response signals (dF/Fmax, %) recorded at single channels and an activation map generated from the signals recorded across all channels. a, Traces of the response signals averaged across four-time repeats of the stimulus sound train which consists of four identical segments of either F (left) or revF (right), as shown below each response trace. Note that the F- and revF-evoked response traces are different even if they are recorded from the same channel. The temporal trace of responses typically shows 4 transient positive deflections that are time-locked to the individual sound segments (asterisks). Note that depolarization takes negative dF/Fmax values that are represented as the upward deflection in the response traces. The shaded portion of the response trace in a is enlarged in the middle trace in b. b, Traces of the F-evoked response signals recorded at three different locations show the tempMs (arrows and arrowhead) in amplitude at different delay times after the sound onset. c, A 2-ms image frame, recorded at the time of the dotted vertical line in b, shows the map of activation that is above the threshold (i.e., 6 SD of the mean of spontaneous activities). The suprathreshold signals are color-coded according to their magnitude (scale bar). Each image frame has a spatial peak, and the largest of these peaks across all the frames recorded for a given trial is designated as the trial-unique maxP. The maxP of activation within the AI is indicated by the large dot in the map and corresponds to the peak (arrowhead) of the trace shown in b. The time when the image frame is recorded (imaging onset is 0) is shown just below the activation map. Image frames have the dimensions of 5 × 5 mm. B, C, Temporal sequence of activation maps evoked by the first F and the first revF segments (upper and lower panels, respectively) during the period of activation in the trained (B) and naïve (C) animals. The 6 SD of the mean of spontaneous activity values is used as the threshold. Large black dots indicate the maxPs within the AI. Small black dots in the F panels show the initial activation peak during the activation period. White dots in the F panels point to the maxP of F-evoked activation within the VA. Two temporal traces of the revF-evoked activation, one recorded at the channel of the revF-evoked maxP (large black dots in the revF panel) and the other recorded at the channel corresponding to the F-evoked maxP (open white squares), are shown below traces. Arrowheads and arrows indicate the tempM at the respective recording channels (note that the arrowhead on the trace recorded at the large black dots corresponds to the revF-evoked maxP). Dotted vertical lines on the revF-evoked traces indicate the time when different image frames are recorded.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Full-time course of trial-unique activation maps in the trained animal. The activation maps evoked by the 1st segments of F (A) and its time-reversed revF (B) in a trained animal are chronologically arranged at 2-ms intervals. The temporal traces of response signals recorded at the F- and revF-evoked maxPs (large dots in Af and Be') are shown below or above the respective frame sequences. In the revF-evoked activation map, the location where the F-evoked maxP is evoked is indicated by the open white square (Be'). The activation maps labeled with lower-case letters are derived from the hatched portions of the response traces. All image frames have the dimensions of 5 × 5 mm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Full-time course of trial-unique activation maps in the naïve animal. The activation maps evoked by the 1st segments of F (A) and its time-reversed revF (B) in a naïve animal are chronologically arranged at 2- and 6-ms intervals, respectively. The temporal traces of response signals recorded at the F- and revF-evoked maxPs (large dots in Ae and Bn') are shown below or above the respective frame sequences. In the revF-evoked activation map, the location where the F-evoked maxP is evoked is indicated by the open white square (Bn'). The activation maps labeled with lower-case letters are derived from the hatched portions of the response traces. All image frames have the dimensions of 5 × 5 mm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Trial-unique response traces recorded at the maxP. Temporal traces of the response signals (dF/Fmax, %) evoked by the first F segment at the channels where the spatiotemporal maxP within the AI is evoked. The sound waveforms below traces show the delay times and duration of the stimulus sounds (F and revF). The time of maxP is indicated by the dotted line for each trace. F, normal natural sound. revF, time-reversed version of F.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Quantitative comparisons of the peaks of sound-evoked signals between the F and revF stimulation and between the animal groups. A, The trial-unique maxPs of activation within the AI (mP) are compared between the F and revF stimulation (FmP and RmP) and between the naïve and trained (N and Tr) animal groups. The channel-unique tempMs (tM) of activation evoked by the revF at the location where the F-evoked maxP within the AI is recorded (RtM at FmP) are compared between the animal groups. B, Coordinate-based Euclidian distances between the F- and the revF-evoked maxP within the AI (FmP-RmP) are compared between the trained (Tr) and naïve (N) animal groups. These distances for the different animal groups are also separately compared with the spontaneous separation distance between the 2 mPs obtained by repeating the F stimulation twice (1stFmP-2ndFmP; i.e., the internal fluctuation). C, Ratios (or Contrasts) of the revF-evoked maxP relative to the F-evoked maxP within the AI (RmP/FmP) are compared between the different animal groups (left). Similarly, the ratios of the revF-evoked tempM at the location of the F-evoked maxP relative to the F-evoked maxP (RtM at FmP/FmP) are compared between the animal groups (right). D, Ratios of the F-evoked maxP within the VA relative to the F-evoked maxP within the AI (FmP.VA/FmP) are compared between the naïve (N) and trained (Tr) animal groups. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. ns, not significant.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Temporal sequence of the F-evoked activation maps. The activation period during which the F-evoked response signals (dF/Fmax, %) are above the threshold (6 SD of the mean of spontaneous activity values) is divided into four consecutive phases. The activation maps representing each of these phases are chronologically shown (from left to right) in a four-frame panel for a given hemisphere. All hemispheres used for the VA activation analysis are shown. The response signals are color-coded (scale bar, %) according to their magnitude. All scale bars have a magnitude range of -0.20-0.20%, and signal values beyond this range are converted to the range maximum, -0.20%. Domains of the peaked activation (red region) evoked by F stimulation tend to spread into the ventral one-fifth zone of the image frame (corresponding to the VA) and cross its ventral side more frequently in the trained than in the naïve group (Figure 9). Quantitatively, the maxPs of VA activation normalized to the maxPs of AI activation are significantly larger for the trained than for the naïve group (Fig. 7D). Hemispheres used in other figures are labeled with the white numbers in the left frame of panels. All maps are oriented in the same way (white arrow).

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Temporal sequence of the revF-evoked activation maps. The activation period during which the revF-evoked response signals (dF/Fmax, %) are above the threshold (6 SD of the mean of the spontaneous activity values, but the 4 or 3 SD for some hemispheres as labeled directly) is divided into four consecutive phases. The hemisphere-unique activation maps representing each of these phases are chronologically arranged (from left to right) in a four-frame panel for a given hemisphere. All hemispheres used for the VA activation analysis are shown. The response signals are color-coded (scale bar, %) according to their magnitude. All scale bars have a magnitude range of -0.20-0.20%. Activation evoked by the revF stimulation is generally weak except for three hemispheres that have the peaked activation (small red domains) within the AI. However, none of the revF-stimulation evokes the peaked activation within the VA. The panels at the corresponding location of Figures 8 and 9 are of the same hemisphere. All maps are oriented in the same way (see white arrows).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Comparison between behavioral performances evoked by different sound types

    Animal groupNumber ofanimals usedResponse to both F and revF (number of animals)Response to F but not to revF (number of animals)Response to revF but not to F (number of animals)Response to neither F nor revF (number of animals)Comparison betweensound types
    Type of testp values
    Trained1111000McNemar test0.00195
    Naïve1100011McNemar test1.000
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Comparison between sound onset-to-maximum peak latencies (in ms) for different animal groups

    Sound typeAnimal groupComparison between
    animal groups
    TrainedNumber of hemispheres usedNaïveNumber of hemispheres usedType of testp values
    F28.3 ± 5.21226.3 ± 4.512Welch test0.323
    revF86.2 ± 50.212111.5 ± 36.212Welch test0.171
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Comparison of sound onset-to-maximum peak latencies (in ms) and their variations between different sound types

    Animal
    group
    Number of
    hemispheres used
    Sound typeComparison of
    means between
    sound types
    Comparison of
    variations between
    sound types
    F (mean ± SD)revF (mean ± SD)Type of testp valuesType of testp values
    Trained1228.3 ± 5.286.2 ± 50.2t test6.46E-04F-test2.31E-08
    Naïve1226.3 ± 4.5111.5 ± 36.2t test4.84E-08F-test3.07E-09
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Comparison between separation distance of maxPs evoked by sounds and internal fluctuation distance

    Euclidian distance betweenF- and revF-evoked maxPs of activationInternal fluctuation, distance of maxPs evoked by repeating FComparison of
    separation distance
    of stimulus-evoked
    maxPs to internal
    fluctuation distance
    Comparison of separation
    distance of F-evoked and
    revF-evoked maxPs
    between animal groups
    Animal groupCoordinate-based distanceNumber ofhemisphere
    s used
    Coordinate-based distanceNumber ofhemispheres
    used
    Type of testp valuesType of testp value
    Trained33.6 ± 15.8129.66 ± 9.427Welch test7.09E-04Welch test0.3858
    Naïve26.8 ± 21.312Welch test0.0283
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Comparison between magnitudes of maxPs evoked by F stimulation and revF stimulation, dF/Fmax %

    Animal groupNumber ofhemispheres usedMaxPs of activation evoked byF and revF stimulationComparison between sound types
    FrevFType of testp values
    Trained120.212 ± 0.0630.116 ± 0.029t test8.74E-05
    Naïve120.199 ± 0.0600.114 ±0.026t test1.97E-04
    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Comparison between maxPs of activation for different animal groups, dF/Fmax %

    Sound typeAnimal groupComparison between animal groups
    TrainedNumber ofhemispheres usedNaïveNumber ofhemispheres usedType of testp values
    F0.212 ± 0.063120.199 ± 0.06012Welch test0.621
    revF0.116 ± 0.029120.114 ± 0.02612Welch test0.872
    • View popup
    Table 7.

    Comparison between contrasts of revF-activation relative to F-evoked activation for different animal groups

    Type of activation contrastNumber of hemispheres usedRatio of revF-evoked maxP relative to F-evoked maxPComparison between animal groups
    Animal groupType of testp values
    NaïveTrained
    RevF-evoked maxP/F-evoked maxP120.600 ± 0.1400.574 ± 0.159Welch test0.6745
    TempM of revF-evoked activation at F-evoked maxP/F-evoked maxP120.449 ± 0.0880.348 ± 0.116Welch test0.0264
    • View popup
    Table 8.

    Comparison of tempMs of revF-evoked activation recorded at the location of F-evoked maxP between different animal groups, dF/Fmax %

    Animal groupNumber of hemispheres usedRevF-evoked tempM at F-evoked maxPComparison between animal groups
    Type of testp value
    Trained120.0711 ± 0.023Welch test0.129
    Naïve120.0873 ± 0.027
    • View popup
    Table 9.

    Comparison of occurrence of VA activation peaks between animal groups

    Animal groupNumber of hemispheres usedNumber of hemispheres with VA peaked activationNumber of hemispheres without VA peaked activationComparison between animal groups
    Type of testp value
    Naïve844Fisher’s exact probability test, two-tailed0.3213
    Trained1082
    • View popup
    Table 10.

    Comparisons of F-evoked maxPs in the VA and AI between trained and naïve animal groups

    Animal groupNumber of hemispheres usedMaxP in VAComparison of VA peaks between animal groupsMaxP in AIMaxP in VA/maxP in AI (normalized)Comparison of VA-AI peak ratios between animal groups
    Type of testp valueType of testp value
    Trained100.208 ± 0.088Welch0.14290.224 ± 0.0610.912 ± 0.177Welch0.0097
    Naïve80.169 ± 0.0740.228 ± 0.0530.665 ± 0.174
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 2
March/April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cortical Activation Patterns Evoked by Temporally Asymmetric Sounds and Their Modulation by Learning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Cortical Activation Patterns Evoked by Temporally Asymmetric Sounds and Their Modulation by Learning
Junsei Horikawa, Hisayuki Ojima
eNeuro 14 April 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0241-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0241-16.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Cortical Activation Patterns Evoked by Temporally Asymmetric Sounds and Their Modulation by Learning
Junsei Horikawa, Hisayuki Ojima
eNeuro 14 April 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0241-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0241-16.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • belt Field
  • Primary Auditory Field
  • Sound Discrimination
  • Spatiotemporal Activation
  • Time-Reversed Sound
  • voltage-sensitive dye imaging

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • The speed of visual discrimination differs between foveola and perifovea: a combined EEG and behavioral investigation
  • Spiking neural network models of interaural time difference extraction via a massively collaborative process
  • Morphological and Molecular Distinctions of Parallel Processing Streams Reveal Two Koniocellular Pathways in the Tree Shrew dLGN
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.