Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleTheory/New Concepts, Integrative Systems

Communication between Brain Areas Based on Nested Oscillations

Mathilde Bonnefond, Sabine Kastner and Ole Jensen
eNeuro 10 March 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0153-16.2017; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0153-16.2017
Mathilde Bonnefond
1Donders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, 6525 Nijmegen, Netherlands
2Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UdL, Lyon, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabine Kastner
3Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ole Jensen
4University of Birmingham, School of Psychology, Centre for Human Brain Health, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ole Jensen
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The communication through coherence (CTC) and gating through inhibition (GBI) hypotheses. a, Two pools of neurons (A and B; e.g., in V1) are connected to a pool of neurons (C; e.g., V4). In this example, pool A communicates with C (solid line) while functional connectivity between B and C is suppressed (dashed line). b, CTC. The waveforms represent oscillatory population activity (as measured in the LFP) in the three regions, whereas the small vertical lines represent spiking activity. The phase of the oscillatory activity modulates the excitability and thus spike timing. It is the phase relationship between the regions that determines the routing. The neurons in A and C oscillate in phase, whereas the neurons in B do not oscillate in phase with C. It has been proposed that this mechanism is implemented by gamma band oscillations (>30 Hz; Fries 2005) c, GBI. The flow of information is controlled by an increase of alpha-band oscillations (∼10 Hz) which inhibits firing in pool B, and a decrease in alpha oscillations of neurons in A and C, allowing communication by release from inhibition (Jensen and Mazaheri 2010). It is the magnitude of the pulses of inhibition and thus the alpha power that controls the routing.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The new framework. The synchronization in the alpha-band establishes the functional connection between A and C. This allows for representational specific neuronal firing reflected by the gamma band activity to flow to region C. The blocking of communication between B and C is achieved by high alpha power in B and an asynchrony between B and C. Therefore both modulations in alpha-band power, as in gating by inhibition, and phase synchronization between the regions, as in CTC, are determining the routing of information between regions. Note that phase synchronization is assumed in the alpha band and the information transfer is reflect by gamma-band activity.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Exchange of phase coded information. a, Two stimuli processed by two pools of neurons A and B, e.g., in V1. The pools both project to a pool of neurons C downstream in the hierarchy, e.g., in V4. Because of this bottleneck in the visual system, it is important that neurons coding for A and B in V1 are not activated simultaneously. For the information related to the two stimuli to be transferred from V1 to V4, we propose two mechanisms. b, A single alpha generator in V1 controls for the timing of activation of neurons in pool A and B as reflected in the gamma band. The activation of the most excitable neurons, i.e., cells in pool A, overcomes the pulse of inhibition early in the alpha cycle followed by neurons in pool B (see Jensen et al. 2014 for details). The temporal organization is then transmitted to the pool of neurons in C. c, Another possibility is that the magnitude of the alpha oscillations is modulated locally and is lower for one of the representations compared with the other. Because the alpha inhibition is lower for A, the respective neurons fire earlier than B. This temporal organization is then transmitted to C.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Converging feed-forward and diverging feedback pathways. a, Pools of neurons A and B converge on a pool of neurons in C. Black arrows represent the converging feedforward pathway and the gray arrows represent the diverging feedback pathway. b, Example in which two cortical columns in V1 (A and B) are connected to a column in V4 (C). Three layers are represented, the supragranular, the granular, and the infragranular. Dark and light grays represented in the layers are involved in the feedforward and feedback pathways, respectively. The layers associated with each pathway are inspired by Markov et al. (2014). The feedforward connections from the pulvinar are also indicated (purple arrows). c, gamma and alpha oscillations have been shown to be prominent in the granular/supragranular and infragranular/supragranular layers, respectively.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 2
March/April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Communication between Brain Areas Based on Nested Oscillations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Communication between Brain Areas Based on Nested Oscillations
Mathilde Bonnefond, Sabine Kastner, Ole Jensen
eNeuro 10 March 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0153-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0153-16.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Communication between Brain Areas Based on Nested Oscillations
Mathilde Bonnefond, Sabine Kastner, Ole Jensen
eNeuro 10 March 2017, 4 (2) ENEURO.0153-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0153-16.2017
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • The CTC and GBI Frameworks
    • A Unified Framework Based on Nested Oscillations
    • Existing Evidence and Predictions for Communication by Nested Oscillations
    • Communication Based on Nested Oscillations Could Be a General Mechanism throughout the Brain
    • Exchange of Phase-Encoded Information
    • Control of Alpha Oscillations in Relation to Cortical Layers
    • The Role of Saccades and Slower Rhythms
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • alpha
  • Brain Communication
  • cross-frequency coupling
  • gamma
  • Slow Oscillations
  • Theta

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Theory/New Concepts

  • The Computational Bottleneck of Basal Ganglia Output (and What to Do About it)
  • Desynchronization Increased in the Synchronized State: Subsets of Neocortical Neurons Become Strongly Anticorrelated during NonREM Sleep
  • Visual Processing by Hierarchical and Dynamic Multiplexing
Show more Theory/New Concepts

Integrative Systems

  • Functional connectome correlates of laterality preferences: Insights into Hand, Foot, and Eye Dominance Across the Lifespan
  • Characteristics of Spontaneous Anterior–Posterior Oscillation-Frequency Convergences in the Alpha Band
  • Alpha-Frequency Stimulation Enhances Synchronization of Alpha Oscillations with Default Mode Network Connectivity
Show more Integrative Systems

Subjects

  • Integrative Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.