Abstract
A cation-π interaction between the ammonium group of an agonist and a conserved tryptophan termed TrpB is a near universal feature of agonist binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). TrpB is one of five residues that form the aromatic box of the agonist binding site, and for the prototype agonists ACh and nicotine, only TrpB makes a functional cation-π interaction. We report that, in addition to TrpB, a significant cation-π interaction is made to a second aromatic, TyrC2, by the agonists metanicotine, TC299423, varenicline, and nornicotine. A common structural feature of these agonists, and a distinction from ACh and nicotine, is a protonated secondary amine that provides the cation for the cation-π interaction. These results indicate a distinction in binding modes between agonists with subtly different structures that may provide guidance for the development of subtype-selective agonists of nAChRs.
- Parkinson's disease
- Addiction
- Ion channels
- Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
- Electrophysiology
- Non-canonical amino acids
Significance Statement
The α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) binding site is made of several loops contributing five aromatic residues. Here, we show four secondary ammonium agonists, TC299423, metanicotine, varenicline, and nornicotine, make a cation-π interaction with TyrC2 in addition to the canonical cation-π interaction with TrpB. The prototypical agonists acetylcholine (a quaternary ammonium), and nicotine (a tertiary ammonium) only make a cation-π interaction with TrpB. This result indicates a new binding mode for agonists with only subtle structural differences and suggests that a more compact cation allows for greater interaction with loop C in the binding site.
Introduction
The neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are members of the Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel family and are established therapeutic targets for nicotine addiction, as well as possible targets for Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, pain, and other neural disorders (Romanelli et al., 2007). The receptors are pentamers, and 11 known subunits, α2-7,9,10 and β2-4, combine to form distinct subtypes (Le Novère et al., 2002; Millar, 2003; Gotti et al., 2006; Zoli et al., 2015). The nAChR binding site lies at the extracellular α-β interface, and it contains an aromatic box motif that binds the cationic moiety of the agonist through a cation-π interaction (Fig. 1; Dougherty, 1996, 2013; Van Arnam and Dougherty, 2014). Five aromatic residues are contributed by four loops, TyrA, Trp B, TyrC1, TyrC2, and TrpD (Corringer et al., 2000). In many studies of ligands binding to nAChRs, TrpB forms a functionally important cation-π interaction, while the other aromatics apparently play other roles (Xiu et al., 2009; Blum et al., 2010, 2013; Puskar et al., 2012; Tavares et al., 2012; Van Arnam and Dougherty, 2014).
A major goal in nAChR research is to develop agonists that target specific subtypes (Holladay et al., 1997; Quik and Wonnacott, 2011; Dineley et al., 2015). For example, the α4β2-containing subtypes are expressed throughout the brain and are most associated with several aspects of nicotine addiction (De Biasi and Dani, 2011). The α6β2-containing subtypes have a more restricted distribution. They occur on dopaminergic neurons, where they have been associated with reward-related behavior and Parkinson’s disease, as well as on medial habenula neurons, which play a role in aversive behavior (Quik and McIntosh, 2006; Jackson et al., 2013; Henderson et al., 2014; Zuo et al., 2016). Finding agonists that meaningfully distinguish between the α4β2 and α6β2 interfaces is an unsolved challenge, but metanicotine (rivanicline, TC-2403, or RJR-2403) and TC299423 have been found to preferentially activate α4β2- and α6β2-containing subtypes, respectively (Drenan et al., 2008; Grady et al., 2010; Xiao et al., 2011; Wall, 2015).
Previous analysis of TC299423 at α6β2 showed an unusual binding pattern, in that the agonist does not make a functional cation-π interaction with TrpB or any other aromatic box residue (Post et al., 2015); thus, a unique binding mode may contribute to its subtype selectivity. Here, TC299423 and other agonists were studied at the more extensively characterized α4β2 receptor to see whether the unusual binding pattern persists. Several agonists were found to make cation-π interactions with both TrpB and TyrC2, and we show that this dual cation-π feature is a more general trend among secondary ammonium agonists (Fig. 2) at α4β2.
Materials and Methods
Molecular biology
Rat α4 and β2 subunits were used as the basis for the constructs. The L9’A mutation in the α4 M2 transmembrane domain, at the gate of the channel, was incorporated to amplify signal by shifting the stability of the channel partially toward the active state. This α4L’Aβ2 construct is described as wild type and/or α4β2 throughout the report for clarity in comparing noncanonical mutations made to the binding site, which is over 60 Å away from the channel gate. All constructs were in the pGEMhe vector, a cDNA plasmid optimized for protein expression in Xenopus oocytes. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by PCR using the Stratagene QuikChange protocol, and primers ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies. Circular cDNA was linearized with SbfI (New England Biolabs) and then transcribed in vitro using T7 mMessage mMachine kit (Life Technologies), with a purification step after each process (QIAGEN). Final concentrations were quantified by UV spectroscopy.
Ion channel expression
Xenopus laevis oocytes (stage V to VI) were sourced from both an institute facility and Ecocyte Bio Science. Oocytes were injected with 50-nL solution containing either 5- or 10-ng mRNA, injected in a 1:2 α4:β2 ratio to control for a pure population of the (α4L9’A)2(β2)3 stoichiometry. The alternative stoichiometry (α4)3(β2)2 has a much lower EC50 due to the extra L9’A mutation. We therefore avoided a mixed population containing both stoichiometries. Cells were incubated 24-48 h at 18°C in ND96 solution (96 mM NaCl, 2mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5mM HEPES, pH 7.5) enriched with theophylline, sodium pyruvate, and gentamycin.
Noncanonical amino acid incorporation
The cyanomethylester form of nitroveratryloxycarbonyl (NVOC)-protected tryptophan and phenylalanine analogues was coupled to dinucleotide dCA and enzymatically ligated to UAG-suppressor 74-mer THG73 tRNACUA. The product was verified by Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight mass spectrometry on a 3-hydroxypicolinic acid matrix. The noncanonical amino acid-coupled tRNA was deprotected by photolysis either on a 500 W Hg/Xe arc lam, filtered with Schott WG-320 and UG-11 filters, or with an M365LP1 365 nm 1150 mW LED lamp (Thor Labs) immediately before coinjection with mRNA containing the UAG mutation at the site of interest. mRNA and tRNA were typically injected in a 1:1 or 1:2 volume ratio in a total volume of 50 or 75 nL, respectively, so that 25 ng of mRNA was injected per cell. In cases where observed agonist-induced currents were low after 48-h incubation, likely due to low protein expression, a second injection of mRNA and tRNA was performed after 24 h. The fidelity of noncanonical amino acid incorporation was confirmed at Trp with a wild-type recovery experiment where tryptophan was loaded onto tRNA. If this experiment yielded similar to EC50 to wild type, then the cell incorporated the charged residue and nothing else. This was accomplished with the Tyr sites by comparing tRNA charged with Phe to a conventional Tyr-Phe mutation. A read-through/reaminoacylation test served as a negative control by injecting unacylated full-length 76-mer tRNA. Lack of current proved no detectable reaminoacylation at the suppression site.
Whole-cell electrophysiological characterization
(S)-nornicotine hydrochloride was purchased from Matrix Scientific, while varenicline (Pfizer), metanicotine, and TC299423 (Targacept) were generous gifts. Agonist-induced currents were recorded in TEVC mode using the OpusXpress 6000A (Molecular Devices) at a holding potential of −60 mV in a running buffer of Ca2+-free ND96, which since α4β2 is Ca2+ permeable, prevents interference from Ca2+-activated channels endogenous to the oocyte. Agonists were prepared in Ca2+-free ND96 and delivered to cells via a 1-mL application over 15 s followed by a 2-min wash. For data from dose-response experiments were normalized, averaged, and fit to the Hill equation using Kaleidagraph (Synergy Software). In data tables, N is the total number of oocytes analyzed, and cells from different frogs on at least two different days were used for each point. Fluorination plots are visualized here with Prism (GraphPad Software). EC50 and Hill coefficient errors are presented as SEM.
Results
Binding studies of TC299423 and metanicotine at α4β2
All studies here used the previously described (αL9’A)2(β2)3 receptor (Kuryatov et al., 2005; Nelson et al., 2003). TC299423 was first probed for cation-π interactions at TrpB and TyrC2 (TyrA, TyrC1, and TrpD have never been implicated in a cation-π interaction). In these experiments, the site of the aromatic residue of interest is mutated to a TAG stop codon. mRNA made in vitro is injected into Xenopus oocytes alongside a bioorthogonal tRNACUA that has been chemically appended to the noncanonical amino acid of interest. To probe for an agonist cation-π interaction, a series of residues with electron-withdrawing groups that weaken the interaction is used. Typically, fluorotryptophans (FnTrp) are used to probe Trp and fluorophenylalanines (FnPhe) are used to probe Tyr (fluorinating tyrosine causes the phenol group to deprotonate at physiologic pH). The endpoints of the two series, F4Trp and F3Phe, are both thought to approximate a situation in which the dominant electrostatic component of the cation-π interaction has been completely removed, allowing a semiquantitative comparison of Trp and Tyr residues. Any change in binding is revealed by a changed EC50 value, monitored by two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology dose-response experiments. If the interaction is weakened by these substitutions, EC50 correspondingly increases. This change is visualized in so-called fluorination plots of the log of the fold-shift in EC50 against the calculated gas-phase cation-π interaction strength.
At TrpB, TC299423 showed an increase in EC50 with each additional fluorine substituent on the ring (Table 1), but the maximum fold-shift in EC50 observed at F4Trp was only 6.6-fold. While this is a modest loss of function, ACh experiences a 66-fold loss of function at F4Trp in α4β2 (Xiu et al., 2009), there is nevertheless a linear trend in the fluorination plot (Fig. 3). Thus, it can be said that TC299423 makes a functional, if modest, cation-π interaction with TrpB in α4β2.
TyrC2 was then probed for a cation-π interaction with TC299423 and showed an unexpected trend, with F3Phe substitution resulting in a 30-fold increase in EC50. When presented as a fluorination plot (Fig. 4), these results show a linear trend, showing that in addition to a cation-π interaction with TrpB, TC299423 makes a functional, and energetically more significant, cation-π interaction at TyrC2.
Metanicotine, an isomer of nicotine in which the pyrrolidine ring has been opened, has antinociceptive effects in mice and is more potent and efficacious than ACh at α4β2 receptors (Damaj et al., 1999; Papke et al., 2000). When analyzed via a fluorination series at TrpB in α4β2, metanicotine displayed a functional cation-π interaction, with a linear fluorination plot and F4Trp resulting in a 25-fold shift in EC50 (Table 2; Fig. 3). TyrC2 also shows a linear fluorination plot, with the F3Phe mutation causing a 51-fold shift relative to Phe (Fig. 4). TyrA was probed and showed no meaningful changes in metanicotine EC50 on fluorination (Table 2; nicotine and ACh also showed no meaningful shifts in EC50 at this site; Xiu et al., 2009). Thus, metanicotine also forms dual, functional cation-π interactions at TrpB and TyrC2 in α4β2.
Both metanicotine and TC299423 are typical nicotinic pharmacophores in that they have a cationic amine moiety, a hydrogen bond donor associated with that amine, and a hydrogen bond acceptor several angstroms away (Blum et al., 2010). In contrast to the tertiary ammonium nicotine and the quaternary ammonium ACh, metanicotine and TC299423 are both secondary ammonium ions. Thus, to test whether this feature was associated with the novel dual cation-π interaction, additional secondary amine agonists were analyzed.
Establishing a binding trend for secondary amines
Varenicline (Chantix) is a smoking cessation drug that is thought to work by serving as a partial agonist to α4β2 (Coe et al., 2005a, 2005b) It has a secondary ammonium as its cationic center. This drug has previously been shown to form a cation-π interaction at TrpB in α4β2 (Tavares et al., 2012), with a 23-fold shift in EC50 at F4Trp (Table 3; Fig. 3), but had not been analyzed at TyrC2.
Nonsense-suppression-based fluorination studies were conducted for varenicline at TyrC2 as discussed above. The corresponding fluorination plot shows a linear trend with a 19-fold shift for F3Phe, confirming that varenicline makes a cation-π interaction with TyrC2 in α4β2 (Table 3; Fig. 4).
Varenicline was the third secondary ammonium agonist to demonstrate functional cation-π interactions with both TrpB and TyrC2 in α4β2. To support the notion that a dual cation-π interaction is associated with secondary ammonium agonists in α4β2, we transformed nicotine, which makes a single cation-π interaction at TrpB, into a secondary ammonium. Nornicotine, nicotine that has been demethylated at the pyrrolidine N, is a natural component of tobacco that is a precursor to the well-documented carcinogen N’-nitrosonicotine that is a by-product of the curing process.(Siminszky et al., 2005)
Nornicotine is much less potent than its methylated analog, with an EC50 of 1.8 μM, a 20-fold greater value than for nicotine. This agonist also elicits much smaller currents; however, the waveform shapes (Fig. 5) are consistent with other agonists, and a clear dose-response relation is present. The fluorination plot of nornicotine at TrpB shows a cation-π interaction, with F4Trp resulting in a 27-fold shift in EC50, demonstrating a functionally important cation-π interaction (Table 4; Fig. 3). Results at TyrC2 show the same type of trend seen for other secondary ammonium agonists analyzed in this report, with a linear fluorination plot and a 11-fold loss of function for F3Phe (Table 4; Fig. 4).
Discussion
Structure-function studies of four different agonists with distinct overall structures but a common secondary ammonium moiety have established a functional cation-π interaction with both TrpB and TyrC2 in α4β2 nAChRs. Nornicotine forms a cation-π interaction with TyrC2, but nicotine, which only differs from nornicotine by being a tertiary rather than secondary ammonium, does not. This nicotine/nornicotine comparison in particular presents a compelling case that the dual cation-π interaction is a consequence of the secondary ammonium group of select agonists at α4β2.
The significance of TrpB in agonist binding to nAChRs remains a central tenet of the pharmacology of this system. In a cation-π interaction, the aromatic ring of Trp is a stronger binding site that those of Tyr or Phe, regardless of the nature of the cation, but Tyr and Phe can certainly make strong cation-π interactions (Davis and Dougherty, 2015). Early studies focused on ACh and nicotine and found that only TrpB showed a strong response to fluorination. We have now found that four other agonists show, in addition to TrpB, a significant response to fluorination at TyrC2. These four are structurally diverse but share a common feature of being a secondary ammonium. The implication is clear that the more compact secondary ammonium is able to establish an additional interaction compared with the bulkier quaternary (ACh) or tertiary (nicotine) systems.
Two studies of the primary ammonium agonist GABA at pentameric receptors, one at the RDL insect GABA receptor and one at the prokaryotic Erwinia ligand-gated ion channel (ELIC) receptor, show that this primary ammonium agonist makes functionally important cation-π interactions to the aromatics at positions B and C2 (Lummis et al., 2005; Spurny et al., 2012). Again, a more compact agonist can make a dual cation-π interaction. A recent computational study of the AChBP aromatic box suggests that the side chains of each aromatic box residue can contribute to the overall cation-π binding energy in the ACh-AChBP complex (Davis and Dougherty, 2015). However, from a functional perspective, only TrpB is universally important, with TyrC2 being identified here as contributing in some, but not all, cases.
A popular model for nAChR gating proposes that loop C moves on agonist binding so as to clamp down on the agonist and more clearly define the aromatic box (Wang et al., 2009). This movement of loop C is proposed to be a key functional feature of the gating mechanism. It may be that with the less bulky secondary ammonium agonists, loop C is able to move closer to the agonist. This larger motion by loop C leads to a closer contact between TyrC2 and the agonist, enabling a cation-π interaction and making TyrC2 responsive to fluorination. AChBP structures with varenicline versus nicotine bound do not show a meaningful difference in the position of loop C, but AChBP did not evolve to undergo a gating process and likely undergoes minimal conformational changes when binding small molecules (Celie et al., 2004; Rucktooa et al., 2012).
In summary, we have found a distinction in the binding mode of agonists at the α4β2 nAChR. The natural agonist ACh and the prominent component of tobacco nicotine both make a cation-π interaction to TrpB, along with other hydrogen bonding interactions. In contrast, four agonists that share a common feature of being secondary ammonium ions make a dual cation-π interaction to TrpB and TyrC2. This pattern may be unique to the α4β2 subtype, as it was not reported for TC299423 at the α6β2 subtype (Post et al., 2015). Further studies of other agonists and other subtypes could provide valuable guidance in designing more subtype-selective activators of nAChRs.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This work was supported by HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (100000065, Grant NS34407); HHS | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (Funding 100000026, Grand DA 019375); and by Beckman Institute at Caltech. M.R.P. was supported by the NIH/NRSA Training Grant 5 T32 GM07616.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.