Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
  • My alerts

eNeuro

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Latest Articles
    • Issue Archive
    • Editorials
    • Research Highlights
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Development

NEUROD2 Regulates Stim1 Expression and Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Cortical Neurons

Gokhan Guner, Gizem Guzelsoy, Fatma Sadife Isleyen, Gulcan Semra Sahin, Cansu Akkaya, Efil Bayam, Eser Ilgin Kotan, Alkan Kabakcioglu and Gulayse Ince-Dunn
eNeuro 27 February 2017, 4 (1) ENEURO.0255-16.2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0255-16.2017
Gokhan Guner
1Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gokhan Guner
Gizem Guzelsoy
1Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gizem Guzelsoy
Fatma Sadife Isleyen
1Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fatma Sadife Isleyen
Gulcan Semra Sahin
1Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gulcan Semra Sahin
Cansu Akkaya
1Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Efil Bayam
1Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eser Ilgin Kotan
1Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eser Ilgin Kotan
Alkan Kabakcioglu
2Physics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alkan Kabakcioglu
Gulayse Ince-Dunn
1Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gulayse Ince-Dunn
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Identification of genome-wide NEUROD2 binding sites at postnatal day 0 cerebral cortex. A, NEUROD2 ChIP-Seq was performed on cerebral cortex tissue using three separate antibodies. Selecting for overlapping peaks in all three datasets revealed 2,071 high confidence binding sites mapping to 1,328 annotated genes. B, Distribution of midpoints of NEUROD2 binding sites based on mouse Ensembl transcripts. Midpoints mapping within ± 1000 bp of TSSs are accepted as promoter binding. C, The number of NEUROD2 binding regions is plotted as a function of the distance of their midpoints to the closest TSS. A clear binding preference for NEUROD2 within ± 1000 bp is observed. D, Quantification of NEUROD2 binding to target and nontarget regions by ChIP-qPCR. Template DNA is immunoprecipitated with NEUROD2 antibody or an unrelated GFP antibody as a negative control. Amount of DNA immunoprecipitated is expressed as percentage of input DNA (% input). NEUROD2 % input values are normalized to GFP % input values as described in Materials and Methods. Enrichment of NEUROD2 is detected at target regions located on Neurod6, Bhlhe22, Nrcam, and Cux1 genes, but not at nontarget regions on Dlx2, Npy, and Gad1 genes. Slight enrichment is also observed in nontarget genes Gsx2 and Calb2. Bars represent SEM. p < 0.0001 determined by one-way ANOVA followed by unpaired t test, *p < 0.05, **p < 1 × 10−4 (Table 2). E, Enrichment of histone marks within NEUROD2 peaks located within different genomic regions is represented as a heat map. Genome-wide enrichment of histone marks, including NEUROD2 target and nontarget sequences, are plotted as baseline controls. F, Gene ontology analysis of all 1,328 genes identifies dendrite morphogenesis and synaptic organization as the two main NEUROD2-regulated biological processes. Significantly enriched GO categories (p < 0.01) are ranked based on their fold enrichment.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    NEUROD2 binds to a conserved intronic element within the Stim1 gene. A, Input DNA or ChIP-Seq tracks acquired from three separate NEUROD2 antibodies or various histone modifications along the Stim1 gene are plotted. B, The midpoint of a 50 bp sliding window across a 550 bp stretch is plotted as a function of its average evolutionary conservation score (PhyloP score). Blue and green traces represent the average of 20 randomly selected exonic or intronic sequences within the Stim1 gene, respectively. The red trace represents the NEUROD2 binding sequence within intron 2. C, The midpoint of a 50 bp sliding window encompassing the NEUROD2 binding sequence within intron 2 is plotted as a function of NEUROD2 ChIP-Seq score (MACS score from NEUROD2 ChIP-Seq with antibody 2). Red lines denote the locations of E-boxes. D, E, A closer view of Stim1 promoter and intronic element are presented. Enrichment of promoter-associated histone modifications H3K4me3 and H3K27ac are observed proximal to Stim1 TSS. While no NEUROD2 binding is observed at the Stim1 promoter, all three antibodies reveal strong enrichment at a specific sequence within intron 2.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Verification of NEUROD2 binding to the conserved element within Stim1 intron 2. A, NEUROD2 binding to Stim1 intronic element is confirmed in E14.5 and P0 cortices by ChIP-qPCR. ChIP DNA acquired with an unrelated GFP antibody is used as a negative control. Amount of DNA immunoprecipitated with either a NEUROD2 antibody (NEUROD2 ChIP DNA) or GFP antibody (GFP ChIP DNA) is expressed as percentage of input DNA (% input). NEUROD2 % input values are then normalized to GFP % input values. Strong enrichment of NEUROD2 is detected at the NEUROD2 binding element located in Stim1 intron 2 both in E14.5 and P0 cortices. Slight enrichments are observed for Stim1 introns 1 and 3. Data are representative of six biological replicates each composed of three technical replicates. Bars represent SEM. p < 0.0001 determined by one-way ANOVA followed by unpaired t test, *p < 0.05, **p < 1 × 10−4, ***p < 1 × 10−5 (Table 2). B, Luciferase activity is measured from HEK 293T cell lysates that are transfected either with an empty luciferase reporter plasmid (pXPG) or with a luciferase reporter downstream of a wild-type (WT-570) or mutated 570 bp fragment (MUT-570) Stim1 intronic element. In addition, cells are also cotransfected with either an empty (pc4) or NEUROD2 expressing (ND2) pcDNA4 vector. Firefly luciferase activity is normalized to Renilla luciferase signal. Data represent three independent experiments with each sample measured in triplicates. Bars represent SEM. D’Agostino–Pearson test showed normal distribution of the data (α = 0.05). One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s multiple-comparison analysis was performed, ****p < 0.0001 (Table 2).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    NEUROD2 suppresses Stim1 expression. A, Immunoblotting analysis reveals that two separate shRNAs (shND2-1 and shND-2) can suppress Neurod2 expression compared with a nonsilencing shRNA (NS) in primary cortical cultures with different efficiencies. B, Neurod2 mRNA levels normalized to Gapdh mRNA is measured by RT-qPCR in cortical cultures transfected with either shND2-1 or shND2-2. While both shRNAs induce an upregulation of Stim1 mRNA, the effect of the more potent shND2-1 is greater. Data represent three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s test, *p = 0.023. C, D, Primary cortical cultures were transfected with NS shRNA and shND2-1. STIM1 protein levels were quantified by immunoblotting and normalized to histone H3 loading control. Data are presented as bar graphs; the line marks the median; the box represents the 25th and 75th percentiles; top and bottom whiskers mark minima and maxima, respectively. Unpaired t test, p = 0.057. E, resND2-myc, a cDNA resistant to shND2-1, was generated. HEK293T cells were transfected with NS shRNA or shND2-1, along with either ND2-myc or resND2-myc cDNAs. Immunoblotting analysis against the myc epitope revealed that while shND2-1 completely knocked down the expression of ND2-myc, resND2-myc expression was not affected. F, Primary cortical neurons were transfected at low efficiency with shND2-1 either alone or together with resND2-myc and immunofluorescently stained against STIM1 protein. Transfected cells were identified based on their coexpression of mCherry from the shRNA-expressing plasmid. G, H, Quantification of STIM1 immunofluorescence signals from experiments presented in F. Experimenter was blinded to all sample identity during staining and quantification. n = 30 for each condition from two independent experiments. Scale bar, 20 µm. Data are presented as bar graphs; the line marks the median; the box represents the 25th and 75th percentiles; top and bottom whiskers mark minima and maxima, respectively. Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison analysis, *p < 0.02, **p = 0.0012, ****p < 0.0001 (Table 2).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    NEUROD2 and STIM1 expression are inversely correlated across cortical development. A, B, Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of protein levels across development in cerebral cortical tissue revealed an inverse correlation between NEUROD2 and STIM1 protein expression. STIM1 protein levels are normalized to the amount of β-actin. Data represents two biological replicates, each quantified as duplicates. Bars represent the SEM. C, Stim1 and Neurod2 mRNA levels were plotted as a function of age in human prefrontal cortex using postmortem tissue. Plots were acquired from braincloud.jhmi.edu (Colantuoni et al., 2011). Similar to mouse data, an inverse correlation in Neurod2 and Stim1 expression was observed in humans as well.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Suppression of Neurod2 expression results in increased SOCE response. A, Primary cortical cultures were transfected with NS shRNA or shND2-1 together with either an empty or shRNA-resistant Neurod2 (resND2) expressing pcDNA4 vector. On the day of imaging, cultures were loaded with calcium-sensitive dye Fluo-3 and imaged by live imaging. Baseline signal was acquired by bathing the cells in Ringer’s buffer containing 2 µm Ca2+. Upon treatment with thapsigargin (Tg) and withdrawal of extracellular Ca2+, a first wave of rise in signal was observed that corresponded to emptying of ER Ca2+ stores (at ∼100 s). A second wave of signal was observed on providing Ca2+ containing Ringer’s buffer that corresponded to store-operated calcium entry (at ∼400 s). B, C, Quantification of initial peak heights for first wave (ER Ca2+ release) and second wave (SOCE) of Ca2+ signals unveiled an increase in SOCE on Neurod2 knockdown that was rescued by coexpression of resND2. D–F, Measurement of the total area under the peaks revealed that ER Ca2+ release was not affected; however, the early phase (∼50 s) but not the late phase of SOCE was significantly upregulated upon Neurod2 suppression. Traces are color coded as follows: NS shRNA (blue); shND2-1 (red); and shND2-1 + resND2 (green). Data are presented as bar graphs; the line marks the median; the box represents the 25th and 75th percentiles; top and bottom whiskers mark minima and maxima, respectively. Neurod2 is abbreviated as ND2. Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison analysis, **p = 0.0073, ***p = 0.0008 (Table 2).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Overexpression of Neurod2 reduces the SOCE response. A, Primary cortical neurons were transfected with either empty or resND2 expressing pcDNA4 vector, and calcium imaging was performed as described in Figure 6A. B, C, Measurement of peak heights of first- and second-wave of Ca2+ signals revealed that overexpression of Neurod2 in otherwise wild-type neurons causes a suppression of SOCE but does not affect steady-state levels of ER Ca2+. D–F, Calculation of total area under peaks demonstrated that both late and early phases of SOCE are downregulated upon Neurod2 overexpression. Traces are color coded as follows: pcDNA4 (blue) and resND2 (orange). Bars represent the SEM. Unpaired t test determined the p value: *p < 0.05. Data are presented as bar graphs; the line marks the median; the box represents the 25th and 75th percentiles; top and bottom whiskers mark minima and maxima, respectively (Table 2). ND2, Neurod2.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Top 10 NEUROD2 target-binding regions

    Gene symbolGene nameEnsembl IDGenomic position of bindingGenomic regionScoreFDR (%)
    Krtap16-1Keratin-associated protein 16-1ENSMUST00000105050chr11: 99985038- 99986631Promoter8439.730
    n/an/an/achr10: 84357827- 84358757Intergenic6366.160
    Prss36Polyserase-2 precursorENSMUST00000094026chr7: 127935318- 127936794Promoter6362.440
    Man1c1Mannosidase α class 1C member 1ENSMUST00000038628chr4: 134579940-134581329Exon5669.730
    n/an/an/achr12: 6638634- 6639508Intergenic5018.180
    TecrSynaptic glycoprotein SC2 (very-long-chain enoyl-CoA reductase)ENSMUST00000165740chr8: 83584694-83585269Intron5011.040
    Stim1Stromal interaction molecule 1ENSMUST00000033289chr7: 102369602-102370206Intron4889.580
    HlcsHolocarboxylase synthetaseENSMUST00000163193chr16: 94313192-94313996Promoter4595.150
    Btbd17BTB/POZ domain-containing protein 17ENSMUST00000156192chr11: 114795002- 114795886Promoter4541.480
    ErgErythroblast transformation-specific transcription factorENSMUST00000077773chr16: 9539059-95391295Intron4390.440
    • Score = −10log10(p value). n/a, Not applicable.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Statistical table

    FigureData structureType of testPower
    1DQuantification of DNA by qPCR (n = 4–6, 2 biological replicates with each having 2–3 technical replicates)One-way ANOVA followed by Student’s t test (two-tailed, type 2)*p < 0.05, **p < 1 × 10−4
    3AQuantification of DNA by qPCR (n = 18, 6 biological replicates with each having 3 technical replicates)One-way ANOVA followed by Student’s t test (two-tailed, type 2)*p < 0.05, **p < 1 × 10−4, ***p < 1 × 10−5
    3BMeasurement of luciferase reporter activity (n = 9, 3 biological replicates with each having 3 technical replicates)Gaussian distribution was confirmed by D’Agostino–Pearson normality test (α = 0.05); one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s test****p < 0.0001
    4BQuantification of mRNA by RT-qPCR (n = 9, 3 biological replicates, with each having 3 technical replicates)Gaussian distribution was confirmed by D’Agostino–Pearson normality test (α = 0.05); one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s test*p = 0.023
    4DQuantification of protein levels by immunoblotting (n = 3 biological replicates)Unpaired t test (two-tailed, type 2)p = 0.057
    4G,HQuantification of protein levels by immunofluorescence (n = 30, from 2 biological replicates)Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-correction analysis*p < 0.02,**p = 0.0012, ****p < 0.0001
    6B–FQuantification of calcium levels by measuring Fluo-3 signal (n = 20–50 per condition)Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-correction analysis**p = 0.0073, ***p = 0.0008
    7B–FQuantification of calcium levels by measuring Fluo-3 signal (n = 20–40 per condition)Unpaired t test (two-tailed, type 2)*p < 0.05
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 4 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 4, Issue 1
January/February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
NEUROD2 Regulates Stim1 Expression and Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Cortical Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
NEUROD2 Regulates Stim1 Expression and Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Cortical Neurons
Gokhan Guner, Gizem Guzelsoy, Fatma Sadife Isleyen, Gulcan Semra Sahin, Cansu Akkaya, Efil Bayam, Eser Ilgin Kotan, Alkan Kabakcioglu, Gulayse Ince-Dunn
eNeuro 27 February 2017, 4 (1) ENEURO.0255-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0255-16.2017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
NEUROD2 Regulates Stim1 Expression and Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Cortical Neurons
Gokhan Guner, Gizem Guzelsoy, Fatma Sadife Isleyen, Gulcan Semra Sahin, Cansu Akkaya, Efil Bayam, Eser Ilgin Kotan, Alkan Kabakcioglu, Gulayse Ince-Dunn
eNeuro 27 February 2017, 4 (1) ENEURO.0255-16.2017; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0255-16.2017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • calcium
  • genomics
  • Neurod2
  • store-operated calcium entry
  • transcription factor

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Food-seeking behavior is mediated by Fos-expressing neuronal ensembles formed at first learning in rats
  • Deficiency of microglial autophagy increases the density of oligodendrocytes and susceptibility to severe forms of seizures
  • Arginine Vasopressin-Containing Neurons of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Project to CSF
Show more New Research

Development

  • SRF is required for maintenance of astrocytes in non-reactive state in the mammalian brain
  • NGF-Dependent and BDNF-Dependent DRG Sensory Neurons Deploy Distinct Degenerative Signaling Mechanisms
  • Myosin Va Brain-Specific Mutation Alters Mouse Behavior and Disrupts Hippocampal Synapses
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.